Date: 14/02/2016 07:34:15
From: monkey skipper
ID: 846442
Subject: Women in Science

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-11/five-women-in-stem-at-top-of-their-fields/7157750

Women in STEM: On UN International Day of Women and Girls in Science, meet five scientists making strides

In December 2015, the United Nations passed a resolution to recognise on February 11 each year women’s contributions to the field.

The UN’s research showed females “continued to be excluded from participating fully in science”, with the number of science graduates significantly lower than males.

That doesn’t mean women have not excelled in science — far from it.

The ABC spoke to a number of Australian female scientists and researchers at the top of their field.
Michelle Simmons

Michelle Simmons has been tasked with creating the next supercomputer that could change the face of international business, weather forecasting and drug design.

While traditional computers complete calculations in sequential order, the quantum computer will complete the tasks simultaneously, potentially resulting in a device millions of times faster.

Right now, the quantum physicist is busy assembling her team at the University of New South Wales, having recently being granted $46 million through government and corporate funding.

Professor Simmons said the goal was to create a commercially available quantum computer in the next decade.

She likens the international race to build the quantum computer to the space race of the 20th Century.

“I think everyone recognises it’s a transformational change in the way computers operate,” she said.

“The rationale for expanding now is we are leading internationally and for a number of years I’ve felt that if we don’t keep that lead, the money will be transferred overseas.”

The computer will not be a pocket-size device, but neither will it be like the first supercomputers that took up an entire room. Professor Simmons said it would be something in between.

“My focus has been that we build something practical,” she said.

Professor Simmons said she would like to see more women working in quantum computing, but does not believe she has faced barriers or obstacles because of her gender.

“I’d encourage more women to go for it because it’s a great field,” she said.

“It’d be nice to have female colleagues around but in terms of the research, when you’re working at the cutting edge everyone is part of the team.”

Dr Rachael Dunlop believes Australian scientists should communicate better with the public, which in turn would lead to much-needed funding.

Dr Dunlop, who was part of a team that identified a link between an amino acid in blue green algae and motor neurone disease, said any cuts to science were worrying.

“The brain drain in this country is real and it’s going to have a huge impact on us,” she said.

“In terms of the return on investment for medical science, the return is three or four-fold. Economically it makes no sense to cut money from an industry that is making money.

“I think we have a responsibility to explain to the public what we’re doing. Sometimes when our funding gets cut, we haven’t got the support for the public.”

Dr Dunlop was optimistic about equality in her field, saying the gender split was about half.

“That’s not to say there’s not inequity. Women aren’t paid as much and there’s not as much mentorship that goes on,” she said.

Dr Dunlop is a visiting associate at Macquarie University, and is working in conjunction with the Institute of EthnoMedicine in Wyoming, USA, on more motor neurone disease research.

Further work is needed to determine what exactly causes the disease, but scientists do know its prevalence is higher in coastal areas where there is greater exposure to the toxic algae.

“It probably requires a faulty gene, combined with the toxin, combined with something like a head injury,” Dr Dunlop said.

Nicknamed Dr Rachie, Dr Dunlop regularly writes about health in the media, is the vice-president of Australian Skeptics Inc and has an active presence on social media.

She is also a passionate pro-vaccine campaigner, and said she was “infuriated” by the anti-vaccine movement
The myths they perpetuate could lead to illness and, in the worst case scenario, death in children,” she said.

“We need to maintain trust in the public health initiatives and they undermine that.”

University of Queensland researcher Janet Lanyon has spent more than 30 years researching dugongs — docile creatures known as the “ladies of the sea”.

Dr Lanyon leads a research team that examines the mammals along Queensland’s coast — an area where population numbers have fallen in recent decades.

“Dugongs are dependent on seagrass … if something leads to degradation of seagrass then dugongs are in strife,” she said.

hey’re susceptible to being captured in nets, harvested for food, they get hit by boats and there may be health issues as well.”

While regular water pollution is a hazard, events such as floods and cyclones also cause problems for dugongs because sediment washes into their habitats and can kill seagrass.

Dr Lanyon’s research found dugongs behaved differently to whales when it came to migration — they don’t travel huge journeys and instead prefer to spend the bulk of their lives in set areas.

Over time that has led to small genetic differences between groups.

Dr Lanyon’s team, which has assistance from Sea World, is now conducting further genetic research in Queensland.

“We have a fantastic team of volunteers. The same people have been working with me for years and they’re so dedicated,” Dr Lanyon said.

Getting dugong samples can be quite the process if researchers want in-depth information such as faecal samples or conducting ultrasounds.

The animals need to be caught and then hoisted onto a boat, where they stay for about half an hour and are then released.

“Once you capture them they just sit quietly in the water, many will try to get away from you in the first minute or two,” Dr Lanyon said.

“They’re pretty docile, like cows in a way.”

Tamara Davis first became interested in space when she saw Halley’s Comet as a child.

Thirty years on, Professor Davis is working with Nobel Prize-winning astrophysicist Brian Schmidt and several hundred of the brightest international minds to find out more about dark energy.

A relatively recent discovery, dark energy suggests the universe is expanding at an accelerated rate.

Professor Davis’s speciality is measuring how soundwaves from the early universe have affected gas patterns millions of kilometres away.

“Once you have measured these soundwaves in the distribution of galaxies, it’s like laying grid paper over the universe,” she said.

“You can measure how much the universe is expanding and you can measure how fast galaxies are growing.”

Professor Davis believes dark energy could hold the key to extraordinary technological advances on earth and in space.

But she admitted the researchers’ “a ha moment” had not quite come yet.

“We’ve discovered anti-gravity, so if we can harness that maybe we will have new forms of propulsion,” she said.

“Maybe we will have a way to make a new type of clean energy.”

Professor Davis said she had felt nothing but support from male colleagues, but said being a female in the astrophysics field had been challenging.

Finding work-related female role models was tough, and she believed there were sometimes subtle biases that make it harder for women.

“Sometimes when I’m the expert in the room I’m not the person called on to answer the question,” Professor Davis said.

“But I just get on with it … I’ve never felt any slight.”

Alice Williamson says the outbreak of the Zika virus, and news a vaccine is years away, is proof scientists need to work together more.

Finding cures for diseases or designing drugs can often be a top-secret project, with groups of competitive scientists working independently of each other around the world.

Dr Williamson, a malaria specialist at the University of Sydney, is part of a project aiming to buck the trend.

She is part of the Open Source Malaria group, trying to find a new treatment for the disease before strains of the parasite that resist existing medication reach Africa.

“If this resistance spreads where the majority of cases are, it would be a real disaster so we need to have a medicine ready. There is a real urgency,” she said.

Open Source Malaria members publish their research in real time and make the data available — a policy Dr Williamson said would hopefully reduce overlapping and scientists making the same mistakes as each other.

It means lucrative patents may be forfeited, but for a disease like malaria — which had an estimated 438,000 victims in 2015 — but Dr Williamson said scientists had a “responsibility” to produce affordable cures.

“If we don’t put patents on our drugs and we find something good, hopefully we can get it to market as soon as possible,” she said.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 10:41:03
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 846487
Subject: re: Women in Science

> She likens the international race to build the quantum computer to the space race of the 20th Century.

I suppose. Though if I was being cynical I would think of it more like the race to find a room temperature superconductor in 1985-1995.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 12:40:38
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 846530
Subject: re: Women in Science

Just as well that there is not a committee pushing a Men and Boys in Science agenda, if so they wouldn’t last long.
They’d be hauled before a Gender Equality Commission and send away for gender politics re-education.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 21:16:29
From: furious
ID: 846663
Subject: re: Women in Science

Plus, they wouldn’t be making strides, they’d buy them from work clobber…

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 21:46:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 846667
Subject: re: Women in Science

furious said:

  • Just as well that there is not a committee pushing a Men and Boys in Science agenda, if so they wouldn’t last long.

Plus, they wouldn’t be making strides, they’d buy them from work clobber…

Now, what is it that you are trying to say?

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 21:58:27
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 846673
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


furious said:
  • Just as well that there is not a committee pushing a Men and Boys in Science agenda, if so they wouldn’t last long.

Plus, they wouldn’t be making strides, they’d buy them from work clobber…

Now, what is it that you are trying to say?

They’ll be contributing to sweatshops……..

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:00:42
From: roughbarked
ID: 846674
Subject: re: Women in Science

Postpocelipse said:


roughbarked said:

furious said:
  • Just as well that there is not a committee pushing a Men and Boys in Science agenda, if so they wouldn’t last long.

Plus, they wouldn’t be making strides, they’d buy them from work clobber…

Now, what is it that you are trying to say?

They’ll be contributing to sweatshops……..

Is it possible for you to elaborate?

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:06:57
From: wookiemeister
ID: 846677
Subject: re: Women in Science

haven’t some blokes already built this thing ages ago?

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:10:03
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 846680
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


Postpocelipse said:

roughbarked said:

Now, what is it that you are trying to say?

They’ll be contributing to sweatshops……..

Is it possible for you to elaborate?

No but thanks for asking………

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:12:10
From: roughbarked
ID: 846681
Subject: re: Women in Science

wookiemeister said:


haven’t some blokes already built this thing ages ago?

FFS, they didn’t even invent overarm bowling.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:14:22
From: roughbarked
ID: 846685
Subject: re: Women in Science

Postpocelipse said:


roughbarked said:

Postpocelipse said:

They’ll be contributing to sweatshops……..

Is it possible for you to elaborate?

No but thanks for asking………

Well that took us where?

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:15:08
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 846686
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


wookiemeister said:

haven’t some blokes already built this thing ages ago?

FFS, they didn’t even invent overarm bowling.

We invented overarm grenade throwing. That’s a good one….

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:15:43
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 846687
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


Postpocelipse said:

roughbarked said:

Is it possible for you to elaborate?

No but thanks for asking………

Well that took us where?

No. Fast.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:18:08
From: Arts
ID: 846689
Subject: re: Women in Science

fwiw celebrating women in science is a great thing

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:19:45
From: Boris
ID: 846691
Subject: re: Women in Science

but, but arts, what’s in it for men???

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:21:10
From: Arts
ID: 846693
Subject: re: Women in Science

Boris said:


but, but arts, what’s in it for men???

just wait until we start celebrating homosexuality in science, or ethnicity in science…

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:22:18
From: sibeen
ID: 846694
Subject: re: Women in Science

Boris said:


but, but arts, what’s in it for men???

Sex :)

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:24:17
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 846695
Subject: re: Women in Science

sibeen said:


Boris said:

but, but arts, what’s in it for men???

Sex :)

In laboratories………

Reply Quote

Date: 14/02/2016 22:31:43
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 846699
Subject: re: Women in Science

Arts said:


Boris said:

but, but arts, what’s in it for men???

just wait until we start celebrating homosexuality in science, or ethnicity in science…

ethnicity is a pigment of your imagination…

:P

Reply Quote

Date: 15/02/2016 00:26:05
From: wookiemeister
ID: 846716
Subject: re: Women in Science

Arts said:


Boris said:

but, but arts, what’s in it for men???

just wait until we start celebrating homosexuality in science, or ethnicity in science…


or those with peanut allergies in science

Reply Quote

Date: 15/02/2016 00:29:39
From: party_pants
ID: 846717
Subject: re: Women in Science

Arts said:


fwiw celebrating women in science is a great thing

I celebrate women in everything.

particularly: underwear and/or my bedroom

Reply Quote

Date: 15/02/2016 01:55:10
From: kii
ID: 846728
Subject: re: Women in Science

Well…..um….why the incredibly long OP? The link says it all WITH photos!!

Reply Quote

Date: 15/02/2016 01:57:11
From: kii
ID: 846729
Subject: re: Women in Science

Peak Warming Man said:


Just as well that there is not a committee pushing a Men and Boys in Science agenda, if so they wouldn’t last long.
They’d be hauled before a Gender Equality Commission and send away for gender politics re-education.

*sigh*

I keep thinking he’s just trolling, then I realise he’s serious about this crap he posts.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/02/2016 05:42:34
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 846731
Subject: re: Women in Science

kii said:

I keep thinking he’s just trolling, then I realise he’s serious about this crap he posts.

Yeah he’s the last of the poor oppressed white males.

Personally I couldn’t believe the hypocracy the other day when he made some homophobic remarks.

Reply Quote

Date: 15/02/2016 07:49:12
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 846734
Subject: re: Women in Science

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 17:44:22
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2023558
Subject: re: Women in Science

Well, thanks to dv we found the appropriate thread so this is good. As mentioned elsewhere, we would compile a list and hopefully more detail of significant female STEMisteeraticians, in the interests of educating our SCIENCE students.

There is additional recent context of course, for example

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-24/girls-participation-in-stem-subjects-dwindling-new-data-shows/102252532

so we consider this useful and important.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 17:47:39
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2023563
Subject: re: Women in Science

dv said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

SCIENCE said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

dv said:

Reading the article on the structure of Mars reminded me of something I noticed in my son’s school resources on the Earth’s structure and tectonism. Alfred Wegener, for instance, is mentioned as the originator of continental drift theory and indeed remembering his name was part of the test. Even lesser lights such as Arthur Holmes got mentioned.

But the person who discovered the structure of the whole earth (solid inner core, liquid outer core, mantle, crust) using seismic data does not get mentioned. This was Danish woman Inge Lehmann, one of the first true geophysicists. I think this is one of the most important discoveries ever but somehow she’s not famous even in the Earth sciences. I do think there is a general tendency to underplay the contributions of women in the sciences.

It would be nice to think that was once the case, but it no longer is.

But sadly it seems that isn’t true.

In the interests of educating our SCIENCE students we will ask for yousr help in listing significant female scientists of this nature. Shortly we will search for pre-existing threads on this, and if not then we may separately initiate one.

I’ll leave it to you then :)

Well I’m sure we know of the cases of women who were not recognised for their contributions at the time such as Maria Kirch, Rosalind Franklin, Jocelyn Bell Burnell. But there are others whose historical contributions are not well enough known today: I only know about Lehmann because her work directly relates to my field.

Thanks again: this is exactly the kind of information we are after, in that there are the well-known ones, and then suddenly we end up in subspecialisation silence whereby only those “in the know” realise that so much of the work was done by XX this or XX* that. Perhaps those subspecialty STEM women should be more well known, and we will Make It So at least in our classes.

*: for simplicity, we are going to stick to binary terms here but the rest of yous can go argue it in those other threads for the purpose, for example https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/16753

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 18:00:18
From: buffy
ID: 2023568
Subject: re: Women in Science

SCIENCE said:

dv said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

I’ll leave it to you then :)

Well I’m sure we know of the cases of women who were not recognised for their contributions at the time such as Maria Kirch, Rosalind Franklin, Jocelyn Bell Burnell. But there are others whose historical contributions are not well enough known today: I only know about Lehmann because her work directly relates to my field.

Thanks again: this is exactly the kind of information we are after, in that there are the well-known ones, and then suddenly we end up in subspecialisation silence whereby only those “in the know” realise that so much of the work was done by XX this or XX* that. Perhaps those subspecialty STEM women should be more well known, and we will Make It So at least in our classes.

*: for simplicity, we are going to stick to binary terms here but the rest of yous can go argue it in those other threads for the purpose, for example https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/16753

Had a quick look at Susanna de Vries book “Great Australian Women. From Federation to freedom”. Not all scientists, but there are some in there. Dagmar Berne and Constance Stone (medicine). Florence M. Taylor (architect).

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 18:03:11
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2023571
Subject: re: Women in Science

So anyway, mentioned in this thread so far are

some of whom were actually revolutionary, others who are local.

Obviously there are more, Lise Meitner for example, who did a lot of shit including establishing nuclear fission; while there are also the well-popularised, for example the Hidden Figures women.

In particular, we SCIENCE are especially interested in the more revolutionary STEMisteeraticians for our teaching, but absolutely please do inform us of anyone you know of who is relevant.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 18:08:52
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2023590
Subject: re: Women in Science

Marie Curie
Ada Lovelace

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 18:09:09
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2023592
Subject: re: Women in Science

buffy said:

Had a quick look at Susanna de Vries book “Great Australian Women. From Federation to freedom”. Not all scientists, but there are some in there. Dagmar Berne and Constance Stone (medicine). Florence M. Taylor (architect).

Thanks, we’ll include that / them in our collection.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 18:26:44
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2023612
Subject: re: Women in Science

Hypatia (born c. 350–370; died 415 AD) was a neoplatonist philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, then part of the Eastern Roman Empire. She was a prominent thinker in Alexandria where she taught philosophy and astronomy. Although preceded by Pandrosion, another Alexandrine female mathematician, she is the first female mathematician whose life is reasonably well recorded.

Not mentioned in the extract above is that she was murdered by a Christian rabble.

Hypatia

I’ll have to look up Pandrosion now.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 18:46:03
From: roughbarked
ID: 2023632
Subject: re: Women in Science

SCIENCE said:

So anyway, mentioned in this thread so far are

  • Michelle Simmons
  • Rachael Dunlop
  • Janet Lanyon
  • Tamara Davis
  • Alice Williamson
  • Inge Lehmann
  • Maria Kirch
  • Rosalind Franklin
  • Jocelyn Bell Burnell

some of whom were actually revolutionary, others who are local.

Obviously there are more, Lise Meitner for example, who did a lot of shit including establishing nuclear fission; while there are also the well-popularised, for example the Hidden Figures women.

In particular, we SCIENCE are especially interested in the more revolutionary STEMisteeraticians for our teaching, but absolutely please do inform us of anyone you know of who is relevant.

Eunice Newton Foote?

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 18:49:43
From: dv
ID: 2023638
Subject: re: Women in Science

buffy said:


SCIENCE said:

dv said:

Well I’m sure we know of the cases of women who were not recognised for their contributions at the time such as Maria Kirch, Rosalind Franklin, Jocelyn Bell Burnell. But there are others whose historical contributions are not well enough known today: I only know about Lehmann because her work directly relates to my field.

Thanks again: this is exactly the kind of information we are after, in that there are the well-known ones, and then suddenly we end up in subspecialisation silence whereby only those “in the know” realise that so much of the work was done by XX this or XX* that. Perhaps those subspecialty STEM women should be more well known, and we will Make It So at least in our classes.

*: for simplicity, we are going to stick to binary terms here but the rest of yous can go argue it in those other threads for the purpose, for example https://tokyo3.org/forums/holiday/topics/16753

Had a quick look at Susanna de Vries book “Great Australian Women. From Federation to freedom”. Not all scientists, but there are some in there. Dagmar Berne and Constance Stone (medicine). Florence M. Taylor (architect).

Fittingly it is a woman Dr Jessica Irving, who has done the Martian equivalent of Lehman’n‘s work, in determining Mars’s structure using earthquake seismology.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 18:53:12
From: buffy
ID: 2023641
Subject: re: Women in Science

I’m sure I’ve got another book somewhere about women in science (in terms of history), but I can’t find it and I can’t recall the name at the moment. However, there are quite a lot of them out there now.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 19:48:39
From: wookiemeister
ID: 2023691
Subject: re: Women in Science

We tend to remember the women in science because there are so few of them that made any real impact, the fact is women are rarely interested in science. One problem is that if they DO make some discovery there’s a very good chance their idea will be STOLEN, or they will be cancelled for wrong think.

There was a chick who made the discovery that the TB vaccine ( i think) being made was using monkey kidneys – she’s suddenly realised this was exposing recipients of the vaccine to monkey viruses. She raised the problem and was cancelled drummed out of science – decades later SV40 started killing people, it was from the vaccine.

Remember the “plandemic” lady who told us back in 2019 that as a scientist that’s got a PHD in the field and has worked in military biological weapons labs she has seen straight away CV19 is human made. Cancelled.

The fact hypatia was killed is no surprise.

What’s a computer?

A computer is a lady that sits in an office with other ladies who do maths work. Before that the first software engineers were babbage and lovelace ( you’d assume Babbage worked with her as well. When women got kicked out of these jobs they ended up as the ladies that ran the top secret machines at bletchley Park ( they were running the heath Robinson/ tunny machine that translated Luftwaffe code I believe) – or the codebreakers.

Yes men , white men were the ones that did a majority of the code breaking work.

I think as time has gone by we seem to be labouring under the impression that women have made these mammoth contributions to science – they haven’t. The other thing is when female scientist have warned us about something we REFUSE to listen to them.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 19:56:39
From: dv
ID: 2023697
Subject: re: Women in Science

wookiemeister said:


We tend to remember the women in science

This is counter to the evidence presented. We tend not to remember or honour most of those that had a major impact.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 20:40:56
From: btm
ID: 2023719
Subject: re: Women in Science

I’d like to suggest Alice Kober, an American classicist whose work was instrumental in deciphering Linear B. She died at 43, before the work was finished. It was continued and extended by Michael Ventris, who’s given credit for the decipherment.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 22:05:49
From: roughbarked
ID: 2023740
Subject: re: Women in Science

Josephine Garis Cochrane.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 22:29:25
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2023743
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


Josephine Garis Cochrane.

looks her up.

Ah, an engineer!

Good choice roughbarked.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/04/2023 22:31:08
From: roughbarked
ID: 2023744
Subject: re: Women in Science

The Rev Dodgson said:


roughbarked said:

Josephine Garis Cochrane.

looks her up.

Ah, an engineer!

Good choice roughbarked.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 00:16:38
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2023751
Subject: re: Women in Science

Thanks all so far¡ Given all the other shit we’re doing we doubt we’ll have a tidy essay on this any time soon but it’ll be useful to students in the meantime. We’ll check back.

Obviously we could also continue by just scouring some encyclopaedic list such as WINTATE, but we appreciate (1) the prioritisation by significance as opposed to some flat list and (2) the insider knowledge.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 08:02:04
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2023803
Subject: re: Women in Science

Irene Curie

Daughter of Marie Curie, jointly with her husband, Joliot-Curie was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1935 for their discovery of induced radioactivity.

Reading about her in the book by Suzie Sheehy

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 08:14:08
From: btm
ID: 2023805
Subject: re: Women in Science

Has Mary Anning been mentioned? And does Emmy Noether qualify (she was primarily a mathematician, and her work is quite well-known now but she wasn’t even allowed to enroll at her university because she was female.)

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 08:15:11
From: roughbarked
ID: 2023807
Subject: re: Women in Science

btm said:


Has Mary Anning been mentioned? And does Emmy Noether qualify (she was primarily a mathematician, and her work is quite well-known now but she wasn’t even allowed to enroll at her university because she was female.)

Good additions.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 08:17:45
From: roughbarked
ID: 2023808
Subject: re: Women in Science

Professor Fiona Wood had more attention because spray on skin was opportune at the time of the Bali Bombing burn victims.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 08:58:51
From: Ian
ID: 2023812
Subject: re: Women in Science

I stumbled upon The Dark Side Of The Universe on ABC TV last night, presented by Australian astrophysicist, Dr Tamara Davis, who studies galaxies and supernovae to explore dark matter.

Vera Rubin was an American astronomer who pioneered work on galaxy rotation rates.  She uncovered the discrepancy between the predicted and observed angular motion of galaxies by studying galactic rotation curves. Identifying the galaxy rotation problem, her work provided the first evidence for the existence of dark matter.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 09:04:25
From: roughbarked
ID: 2023813
Subject: re: Women in Science

Ian said:


I stumbled upon The Dark Side Of The Universe on ABC TV last night, presented by Australian astrophysicist, Dr Tamara Davis, who studies galaxies and supernovae to explore dark matter.

Vera Rubin was an American astronomer who pioneered work on galaxy rotation rates.  She uncovered the discrepancy between the predicted and observed angular motion of galaxies by studying galactic rotation curves. Identifying the galaxy rotation problem, her work provided the first evidence for the existence of dark matter.

Yes. I watched that as well.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 09:10:11
From: roughbarked
ID: 2023814
Subject: re: Women in Science

https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/10-amazing-women-in-science-history-you-really-should-know-about/

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/women-in-stem

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 09:16:06
From: Arts
ID: 2023819
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


Professor Fiona Wood had more attention because spray on skin was opportune at the time of the Bali Bombing burn victims.

that’s what got her the AOTY award, but her work was there before the bombings and is ongoing and she is still a notable woman in science despite the award.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 09:16:50
From: roughbarked
ID: 2023821
Subject: re: Women in Science

Arts said:


roughbarked said:

Professor Fiona Wood had more attention because spray on skin was opportune at the time of the Bali Bombing burn victims.

that’s what got her the AOTY award, but her work was there before the bombings and is ongoing and she is still a notable woman in science despite the award.

Yes.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 09:37:07
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2023831
Subject: re: Women in Science

I spotted a book on Amazon that looks interesting.

Women in Science: 50 Fearless Pioneers Who Changed the World
https://www.amazon.com.au/Women-Science-Rachel-Ignotofsky/dp/1607749769

A charmingly illustrated gift book profiling 50 famous women scientists from the ancient Greek mathematician, philosopher, and astronomer, Hypatia, to Marie Curie, a physicist and chemist.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 09:38:54
From: roughbarked
ID: 2023833
Subject: re: Women in Science

Rachel Carson was a marine biologist and environmentalist — whose groundbreaking book, Silent Spring, has been credited as the catalyst for the modern environmental movement. Carson passed away in 1964, but her work has been credited with the legacy of “awakening the concern of Americans for the environment.”

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 10:06:12
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2023870
Subject: re: Women in Science

First women in science

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia

Hypatia (born c. 350–370; died 415 AD) was a neoplatonist philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, then part of the Eastern Roman Empire. She was a prominent thinker in Alexandria where she taught philosophy and astronomy. Although preceded by Pandrosion, another Alexandrine female mathematician, she is the first female mathematician whose life is reasonably well recorded

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandrosion

Pandrosion of Alexandria (Greek: Πανδροσιον) was a mathematician in fourth-century-AD Alexandria, discussed in the Mathematical Collection of Pappus of Alexandria and known for developing an approximate method for doubling the cube. Although there is disagreement on the subject, Pandrosion is believed by many current scholars to have been female. If so, she would be an earlier female contributor to mathematics than Hypatia.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 10:07:55
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2023871
Subject: re: Women in Science

Tau.Neutrino said:


First women in science

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia

Hypatia (born c. 350–370; died 415 AD) was a neoplatonist philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, then part of the Eastern Roman Empire. She was a prominent thinker in Alexandria where she taught philosophy and astronomy. Although preceded by Pandrosion, another Alexandrine female mathematician, she is the first female mathematician whose life is reasonably well recorded

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandrosion

Pandrosion of Alexandria (Greek: Πανδροσιον) was a mathematician in fourth-century-AD Alexandria, discussed in the Mathematical Collection of Pappus of Alexandria and known for developing an approximate method for doubling the cube. Although there is disagreement on the subject, Pandrosion is believed by many current scholars to have been female. If so, she would be an earlier female contributor to mathematics than Hypatia.

I’m sure someone mentioned those two ancients already :)

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 10:09:36
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2023873
Subject: re: Women in Science

The Rev Dodgson said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

First women in science

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia

Hypatia (born c. 350–370; died 415 AD) was a neoplatonist philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, then part of the Eastern Roman Empire. She was a prominent thinker in Alexandria where she taught philosophy and astronomy. Although preceded by Pandrosion, another Alexandrine female mathematician, she is the first female mathematician whose life is reasonably well recorded

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandrosion

Pandrosion of Alexandria (Greek: Πανδροσιον) was a mathematician in fourth-century-AD Alexandria, discussed in the Mathematical Collection of Pappus of Alexandria and known for developing an approximate method for doubling the cube. Although there is disagreement on the subject, Pandrosion is believed by many current scholars to have been female. If so, she would be an earlier female contributor to mathematics than Hypatia.

I’m sure someone mentioned those two ancients already :)

sorry, missed it, I did scroll through

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 10:09:50
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2023874
Subject: re: Women in Science

The Rev Dodgson said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

First women in science

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia

Hypatia (born c. 350–370; died 415 AD) was a neoplatonist philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, then part of the Eastern Roman Empire. She was a prominent thinker in Alexandria where she taught philosophy and astronomy. Although preceded by Pandrosion, another Alexandrine female mathematician, she is the first female mathematician whose life is reasonably well recorded

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandrosion

Pandrosion of Alexandria (Greek: Πανδροσιον) was a mathematician in fourth-century-AD Alexandria, discussed in the Mathematical Collection of Pappus of Alexandria and known for developing an approximate method for doubling the cube. Although there is disagreement on the subject, Pandrosion is believed by many current scholars to have been female. If so, she would be an earlier female contributor to mathematics than Hypatia.

I’m sure someone mentioned those two ancients already :)

We guess there are going to be a whole heap once one starts digging; as some kind of filter though maybe we might even rely on the number of mentions as a measure of significance¡

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 10:10:31
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2023875
Subject: re: Women in Science

Some names have already been posted but this is the list from the article

22 pioneering women in science history you really should know about

Rosalind Franklin
Janet Taylor
Beatrice Shilling
Dorothy Hodgkin
Sophia Louisa Jex-Blake
Katherine Johnson
Helen Gwynne-Vaughan
Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin
Inge Lehmann
Wally Funk
Caroline Herschel
Mary Anning
Lise Meitner
Barbara McClintock
Mary the Jewess
Elizabeth Garrett Anderson
Grace Hopper
Valentina Tereshkova
Jane Goodall
Ada Lovelace
Alice Augusta Ball
Marie Maynard Daly

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 10:19:51
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2023884
Subject: re: Women in Science

The Rev Dodgson said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

First women in science

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia

Hypatia (born c. 350–370; died 415 AD) was a neoplatonist philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, then part of the Eastern Roman Empire. She was a prominent thinker in Alexandria where she taught philosophy and astronomy. Although preceded by Pandrosion, another Alexandrine female mathematician, she is the first female mathematician whose life is reasonably well recorded

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandrosion

Pandrosion of Alexandria (Greek: Πανδροσιον) was a mathematician in fourth-century-AD Alexandria, discussed in the Mathematical Collection of Pappus of Alexandria and known for developing an approximate method for doubling the cube. Although there is disagreement on the subject, Pandrosion is believed by many current scholars to have been female. If so, she would be an earlier female contributor to mathematics than Hypatia.

I’m sure someone mentioned those two ancients already :)

>>Murdered by a Christian mob

Bunch of Good Thinkers. geez.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 10:43:02
From: roughbarked
ID: 2023887
Subject: re: Women in Science

Tau.Neutrino said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

First women in science

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia

Hypatia (born c. 350–370; died 415 AD) was a neoplatonist philosopher, astronomer, and mathematician who lived in Alexandria, Egypt, then part of the Eastern Roman Empire. She was a prominent thinker in Alexandria where she taught philosophy and astronomy. Although preceded by Pandrosion, another Alexandrine female mathematician, she is the first female mathematician whose life is reasonably well recorded

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandrosion

Pandrosion of Alexandria (Greek: Πανδροσιον) was a mathematician in fourth-century-AD Alexandria, discussed in the Mathematical Collection of Pappus of Alexandria and known for developing an approximate method for doubling the cube. Although there is disagreement on the subject, Pandrosion is believed by many current scholars to have been female. If so, she would be an earlier female contributor to mathematics than Hypatia.

I’m sure someone mentioned those two ancients already :)

sorry, missed it, I did scroll through

Shows that you don’t look at pictures.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 10:49:25
From: SCIENCE
ID: 2023896
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

I’m sure someone mentioned those two ancients already :)

sorry, missed it, I did scroll through

Shows that you don’t look at pictures.

Advertising blockades do sometimes prevent display.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 10:54:55
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2023898
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

I’m sure someone mentioned those two ancients already :)

sorry, missed it, I did scroll through

Shows that you don’t look at pictures.

I will have to scroll slower and pay more attention to what is posted..

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2023 10:57:23
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2023899
Subject: re: Women in Science

That book looks interesting, I have bookmarked it for future reading.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 08:00:28
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2024177
Subject: re: Women in Science

From the Suzie Sheehy book:

Frances Elizabeth Alexander established that radio signals were coming from the Sun.

In 1967 Jocelyn Bell-Burnell discovered pulsars, the discovery of which earned a Nobel Prize, but for her PhD supervisor, Anthony Hewish, and not her.

In 2018, she was awarded the Special Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics. Following the announcement of the award, she decided to use the $3 million (£2.3 million) prize money to establish a fund to help female, minority and refugee students to become research physicists.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 09:24:12
From: roughbarked
ID: 2024219
Subject: re: Women in Science

Not really a scientist per se.
Although politics and philosophy are basically sciences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 09:27:23
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2024221
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


Not really a scientist per se.
Although politics and philosophy are basically sciences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

-1

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 09:42:18
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2024229
Subject: re: Women in Science

Witty Rejoinder said:


roughbarked said:

Not really a scientist per se.
Although politics and philosophy are basically sciences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

-1

Ayn Rand was a loony, delusional, narcissistic, grasping old bat for whom no-one who was ever acquainted with her ever had a good word. By all accounts, a complete and utter arsehole. What i’ve read of her writings reflects this, and i think that adopting her ideas as guiding influences in your life is only likely to lead you down the same dark hole as her.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 09:54:10
From: roughbarked
ID: 2024241
Subject: re: Women in Science

captain_spalding said:


Witty Rejoinder said:

roughbarked said:

Not really a scientist per se.
Although politics and philosophy are basically sciences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

-1

Ayn Rand was a loony, delusional, narcissistic, grasping old bat for whom no-one who was ever acquainted with her ever had a good word. By all accounts, a complete and utter arsehole. What i’ve read of her writings reflects this, and i think that adopting her ideas as guiding influences in your life is only likely to lead you down the same dark hole as her.

Didn’t say I did.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 09:54:25
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2024242
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


Not really a scientist per se.
Although politics and philosophy are basically sciences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

Well I agree with the first six words.

Although the “really” and “per se” are a bit superfluous.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 09:57:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 2024249
Subject: re: Women in Science

The Rev Dodgson said:


roughbarked said:

Not really a scientist per se.
Although politics and philosophy are basically sciences.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayn_Rand

Well I agree with the first six words.

Although the “really” and “per se” are a bit superfluous.

I must admit I’ve never read any of her works. However, as a woman her achievements were remarkable for her day.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 09:57:49
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 2024250
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

-1

Ayn Rand was a loony, delusional, narcissistic, grasping old bat for whom no-one who was ever acquainted with her ever had a good word. By all accounts, a complete and utter arsehole. What i’ve read of her writings reflects this, and i think that adopting her ideas as guiding influences in your life is only likely to lead you down the same dark hole as her.

Didn’t say I did.

So, we’re all agreed then.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 09:58:10
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2024251
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

Witty Rejoinder said:

-1

Ayn Rand was a loony, delusional, narcissistic, grasping old bat for whom no-one who was ever acquainted with her ever had a good word. By all accounts, a complete and utter arsehole. What i’ve read of her writings reflects this, and i think that adopting her ideas as guiding influences in your life is only likely to lead you down the same dark hole as her.

Didn’t say I did.

I didn’t imagine that you, personally, had.

It had occurred to me, in the recent past, that it would have been quite a spectacle to put Ayn Rand and Donald Trump in the same room and watch them try to out-arsehole each other.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 10:00:15
From: roughbarked
ID: 2024253
Subject: re: Women in Science

The Rev Dodgson said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

Ayn Rand was a loony, delusional, narcissistic, grasping old bat for whom no-one who was ever acquainted with her ever had a good word. By all accounts, a complete and utter arsehole. What i’ve read of her writings reflects this, and i think that adopting her ideas as guiding influences in your life is only likely to lead you down the same dark hole as her.

Didn’t say I did.

So, we’re all agreed then.

Yes.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 10:00:41
From: roughbarked
ID: 2024255
Subject: re: Women in Science

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

Ayn Rand was a loony, delusional, narcissistic, grasping old bat for whom no-one who was ever acquainted with her ever had a good word. By all accounts, a complete and utter arsehole. What i’ve read of her writings reflects this, and i think that adopting her ideas as guiding influences in your life is only likely to lead you down the same dark hole as her.

Didn’t say I did.

I didn’t imagine that you, personally, had.

It had occurred to me, in the recent past, that it would have been quite a spectacle to put Ayn Rand and Donald Trump in the same room and watch them try to out-arsehole each other.


Now that could be interesting.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 10:04:14
From: captain_spalding
ID: 2024257
Subject: re: Women in Science

roughbarked said:


captain_spalding said:

roughbarked said:

Didn’t say I did.

I didn’t imagine that you, personally, had.

It had occurred to me, in the recent past, that it would have been quite a spectacle to put Ayn Rand and Donald Trump in the same room and watch them try to out-arsehole each other.


Now that could be interesting.

I think it’d have to be in a cavern of some sort, way down under Nevada or somewhere, because they might have achieved a critical-mass level of self-centred bum-headedness, and annihilated themselves in a blinding flash, along with thousands of tons of rock.

For which the world would be better off. Except for the loss of the rock.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 10:05:23
From: roughbarked
ID: 2024259
Subject: re: Women in Science

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

I didn’t imagine that you, personally, had.

It had occurred to me, in the recent past, that it would have been quite a spectacle to put Ayn Rand and Donald Trump in the same room and watch them try to out-arsehole each other.


Now that could be interesting.

I think it’d have to be in a cavern of some sort, way down under Nevada or somewhere, because they might have achieved a critical-mass level of self-centred bum-headedness, and annihilated themselves in a blinding flash, along with thousands of tons of rock.

For which the world would be better off. Except for the loss of the rock.

That kind of rock fusing would be gold. ;)

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2023 13:13:56
From: PermeateFree
ID: 2024382
Subject: re: Women in Science

captain_spalding said:


roughbarked said:

captain_spalding said:

Ayn Rand was a loony, delusional, narcissistic, grasping old bat for whom no-one who was ever acquainted with her ever had a good word. By all accounts, a complete and utter arsehole. What i’ve read of her writings reflects this, and i think that adopting her ideas as guiding influences in your life is only likely to lead you down the same dark hole as her.

Didn’t say I did.

I didn’t imagine that you, personally, had.

It had occurred to me, in the recent past, that it would have been quite a spectacle to put Ayn Rand and Donald Trump in the same room and watch them try to out-arsehole each other.

For fuck sake man, what is the matter with you these days? Think you have been spending too much on this forum that has turned you into a self-opinionated, irrational nincompoop.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 10:36:33
From: dv
ID: 2034420
Subject: re: Women in Science

If only there were some kind of Index that can be used to find threads.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 10:37:24
From: roughbarked
ID: 2034422
Subject: re: Women in Science

dv said:


If only there were some kind of Index that can be used to find threads.

That’s where I was looking.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 10:39:04
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2034423
Subject: re: Women in Science

dv said:


If only there were some kind of Index that can be used to find threads.

we would need someone with an altruistic bent to undertake such a herculean task. where will find such a person?

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 10:45:43
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2034425
Subject: re: Women in Science

dv said:


If only there were some kind of Index that can be used to find threads.

Yes. it would be handy.

:)

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 10:47:20
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2034426
Subject: re: Women in Science

Sister Mary Kenneth Keller, the first woman to earn a doctorate (PhD) in computer science in the United States, 1965.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 10:51:12
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2034427
Subject: re: Women in Science

dv said:


If only there were some kind of Index that can be used to find threads.

That thread is much better for searching for topics.

Thanks.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 10:59:32
From: dv
ID: 2034430
Subject: re: Women in Science

ChrispenEvan said:


dv said:

If only there were some kind of Index that can be used to find threads.

we would need someone with an altruistic bent to undertake such a herculean task. where will find such a person?

“The word ‘hero’ is overused in modern discourse, yet…”

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 11:03:27
From: dv
ID: 2034431
Subject: re: Women in Science

Tau.Neutrino said:


Sister Mary Kenneth Keller, the first woman to earn a doctorate (PhD) in computer science in the United States, 1965.


Is that the Papal Mainframe?

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 11:07:19
From: roughbarked
ID: 2034433
Subject: re: Women in Science

dv said:


ChrispenEvan said:

dv said:

If only there were some kind of Index that can be used to find threads.

we would need someone with an altruistic bent to undertake such a herculean task. where will find such a person?

“The word ‘hero’ is overused in modern discourse, yet…”

All right, I will call you our hero. Will that do?

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 11:09:26
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2034434
Subject: re: Women in Science

dv said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

Sister Mary Kenneth Keller, the first woman to earn a doctorate (PhD) in computer science in the United States, 1965.


Is that the Papal Mainframe?

Be funny if it was wouldn’t it.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 11:09:44
From: roughbarked
ID: 2034435
Subject: re: Women in Science

dv said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

Sister Mary Kenneth Keller, the first woman to earn a doctorate (PhD) in computer science in the United States, 1965.


Is that the Papal Mainframe?

She’s also known as the Mother Superior of Electronic Dance Music

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 11:10:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 2034436
Subject: re: Women in Science

Tau.Neutrino said:


dv said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

Sister Mary Kenneth Keller, the first woman to earn a doctorate (PhD) in computer science in the United States, 1965.


Is that the Papal Mainframe?

Be funny if it was wouldn’t it.

If papal, then they’d still be using the original sin.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 11:10:52
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 2034437
Subject: re: Women in Science

dv said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

Sister Mary Kenneth Keller, the first woman to earn a doctorate (PhD) in computer science in the United States, 1965.


Is that the Papal Mainframe?

she has a very pointy head. reminds me of Zippy.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 11:11:06
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 2034438
Subject: re: Women in Science

Tau.Neutrino said:


Sister Mary Kenneth Keller, the first woman to earn a doctorate (PhD) in computer science in the United States, 1965.



Sisters are doin’ it for themselves!

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 11:14:35
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2034439
Subject: re: Women in Science

dv said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

Sister Mary Kenneth Keller, the first woman to earn a doctorate (PhD) in computer science in the United States, 1965.


Is that the Papal Mainframe?

Banned in Florida and several other US states.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 11:15:44
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2034440
Subject: re: Women in Science

Tau.Neutrino said:


dv said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

Sister Mary Kenneth Keller, the first woman to earn a doctorate (PhD) in computer science in the United States, 1965.


Is that the Papal Mainframe?

Banned in Florida and several other US states.

Imagine being a Bi Trans

I suppose sexual diversity would allow it.

Reply Quote

Date: 23/05/2023 11:20:37
From: roughbarked
ID: 2034444
Subject: re: Women in Science

ChrispenEvan said:


dv said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

Sister Mary Kenneth Keller, the first woman to earn a doctorate (PhD) in computer science in the United States, 1965.


Is that the Papal Mainframe?

she has a very pointy head. reminds me of Zippy.


A cone head?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/06/2023 20:01:45
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 2042963
Subject: re: Women in Science

Kathleen Hylda Valerie Booth was a British computer scientist and mathematician who wrote the first assembly language, she died at 100 years old

Kathleen Hylda Valerie Booth was a British computer scientist and mathematician who wrote the first assembly language and designed the assembler and autocode for the first computer systems at Birkbeck College, University of London. She helped design three different machines including the ARC, SEC, and APEC.

Born: 9 July 1922, Stourbridge, United Kingdom Died: 29 September 2022

Reply Quote