A recent investigation has discovered that an atom thick sheet of superfluid-state helium generates and sustains a voltage.

Assemble this sheet battery within a centrifuge and rotate rapidly.

I expect this will provide some startling observables up to and including cold fusion. The list of expected results is extensive and not within my current fatigue limits to concisely define at this time.

Attaining cold-fusion voltage might require a considerably rapid rotation…….

“Amp up and amplify-DEFY!” Rage Against The Machine

Link?

CrazyNeutrino said:

Link?

There is a thread somewhere’s back on the subject. I’m super-tired right now so couldn’t be arsed looking it up.

Don’t worry if somebody hasn’t already sniffed this out out there I’ll get round to quantifying some of the expected results.

In the meantime I’ll just ask the question ‘during expansion which factor has governing precedence, central or angular momentum?’

Postpocelipse said:

“Amp up and amplify-DEFY!” Rage Against The Machine

Rage Against The Machine: Take The Power Back

‘astook yaw meenin Crazy…….

coolest thread EVAH!

Design elements of centrifuge: Battery seat composed of carbon nano-mesh arranged polarically and designed to maximise tunnelling capacity.

In this arrangement I would still expect a limit to the acceleration you would apply to the centrifuge.

> Assemble this sheet battery within a centrifuge and rotate rapidly.

You do know what happens when you put a superfluid in a centrifuge, don’t you? It flows.

You get charge separation better and more easily within an insulator (an insulator is also called a dielectric).

If you rotate an axially symmetric charge distribution as you suggest you get – a rotating charge – nothing else.

mollwollfumble said:

> Assemble this sheet battery within a centrifuge and rotate rapidly.

You do know what happens when you put a superfluid in a centrifuge, don’t you? It flows.

You get charge separation better and more easily within an insulator (an insulator is also called a dielectric).

If you rotate an axially symmetric charge distribution as you suggest you get – a rotating charge – nothing else.

that is the purpose of the nano carbon mesh seat if you hadn’t got to there yet…..

Postpocelipse said:

mollwollfumble said:

> Assemble this sheet battery within a centrifuge and rotate rapidly.

You do know what happens when you put a superfluid in a centrifuge, don’t you? It flows.

You get charge separation better and more easily within an insulator (an insulator is also called a dielectric).

If you rotate an axially symmetric charge distribution as you suggest you get – a rotating charge – nothing else.

that is the purpose of the nano carbon mesh seat if you hadn’t got to there yet…..

aside from providing a means to draw off power that is…………

This is just dreadful foruming, Postpoc. The pits.

Here’s how to do it:

Create a single post summarising the information and your thoughts on the topic, including any relevant links.

Then wait for others to respond. Then respond to them.

probably comes Tesla certified as well.

dv said:

This is just dreadful foruming, Postpoc. The pits.

Here’s how to do it:

Create a single post summarising the information and your thoughts on the topic, including any relevant links.

Then wait for others to respond. Then respond to them.

bruss I just bin thru 18+ months of having 5 years waved over my head for something that never happened and am tired as. It’s as basic a design as can be nano engineered. add it up.

there is a ‘view full thread’ tab n all…….

and I didn’t even finish school let alone get to practice contemporary presentation

Stop the Press! Himself

Postpocelipse said:

and I didn’t even finish school let alone get to practice contemporary presentation

it shows..

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

and I didn’t even finish school let alone get to practice contemporary presentation

it shows..

Nods, no leavers jackets

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

and I didn’t even finish school let alone get to practice contemporary presentation

it shows..

suffer in your jocks

Postpocelipse said:

bruss I just bin thru 18+ months of having 5 years waved over my head for something that never happened and am tired as. It’s as basic a design as can be nano engineered. add it up.

5 years minimum for the pfft! “alternative charge”. The first carried 12.

Postpocelipse said:

Postpocelipse said:

bruss I just bin thru 18+ months of having 5 years waved over my head for something that never happened and am tired as. It’s as basic a design as can be nano engineered. add it up.

5 years minimum for the pfft! “alternative charge”. The first carried 12.

tbh, if the allegations were true, I’d hope the perpetrator got more than that, wouldn’t you?

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

Postpocelipse said:

bruss I just bin thru 18+ months of having 5 years waved over my head for something that never happened and am tired as. It’s as basic a design as can be nano engineered. add it up.

5 years minimum for the pfft! “alternative charge”. The first carried 12.

tbh, if the allegations were true, I’d hope the perpetrator got more than that, wouldn’t you?

your reference confounds me?

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

5 years minimum for the pfft! “alternative charge”. The first carried 12.

tbh, if the allegations were true, I’d hope the perpetrator got more than that, wouldn’t you?

your reference confounds me?

which reference?

Postpocelipse said:

Postpocelipse said:

bruss I just bin thru 18+ months of having 5 years waved over my head for something that never happened and am tired as. It’s as basic a design as can be nano engineered. add it up.

5 years minimum for the pfft! “alternative charge”. The first carried 12.

It seems an extreme sentence I’ve seem buggers that actually set fires deliberately get suspended jail. I suppose it depends on the charge itself though

Cymek said:

Postpocelipse said:

Postpocelipse said:

bruss I just bin thru 18+ months of having 5 years waved over my head for something that never happened and am tired as. It’s as basic a design as can be nano engineered. add it up.

5 years minimum for the pfft! “alternative charge”. The first carried 12.

It seems an extreme sentence I’ve seem buggers that actually set fires deliberately get suspended jail. I suppose it depends on the charge itself though

suspended sentences aren’t a walk in the park though

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

tbh, if the allegations were true, I’d hope the perpetrator got more than that, wouldn’t you?

your reference confounds me?

which reference?

to culpability or any sort of criminal encumbrance. on my part. The extent of the criminality on the part of the crown witnesses is up to but not limited to perjury, which they will discover is not taken with any humour by the bench.

Arts said:

Cymek said:

Postpocelipse said:

5 years minimum for the pfft! “alternative charge”. The first carried 12.

It seems an extreme sentence I’ve seem buggers that actually set fires deliberately get suspended jail. I suppose it depends on the charge itself though

suspended sentences aren’t a walk in the park though

No if conditions are attached to them they can be quite involved

Cymek said:

Postpocelipse said:

Postpocelipse said:

bruss I just bin thru 18+ months of having 5 years waved over my head for something that never happened and am tired as. It’s as basic a design as can be nano engineered. add it up.

5 years minimum for the pfft! “alternative charge”. The first carried 12.

It seems an extreme sentence I’ve seem buggers that actually set fires deliberately get suspended jail. I suppose it depends on the charge itself though

As it was at least a matter of small media note at the time of the incident it will inevitably be back there when facts are provided to the media.

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

your reference confounds me?

which reference?

to culpability or any sort of criminal encumbrance. on my part. The extent of the criminality on the part of the crown witnesses is up to but not limited to perjury, which they will discover is not taken with any humour by the bench.

and how does that ;confound’ you?

Arts said:

Cymek said:

Postpocelipse said:

5 years minimum for the pfft! “alternative charge”. The first carried 12.

It seems an extreme sentence I’ve seem buggers that actually set fires deliberately get suspended jail. I suppose it depends on the charge itself though

suspended sentences aren’t a walk in the park though

Haven’t busted one yet.

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

which reference?

to culpability or any sort of criminal encumbrance. on my part. The extent of the criminality on the part of the crown witnesses is up to but not limited to perjury, which they will discover is not taken with any humour by the bench.

and how does that ;confound’ you?

i’m tired, what was the question again? your hopperness?

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

to culpability or any sort of criminal encumbrance. on my part. The extent of the criminality on the part of the crown witnesses is up to but not limited to perjury, which they will discover is not taken with any humour by the bench.

and how does that ;confound’ you?

i’m tired, what was the question again? your hopperness?

you’re the one telling the story…
and you posted the question in that reply

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

and how does that ;confound’ you?

i’m tired, what was the question again? your hopperness?

you’re the one telling the story…
and you posted the question in that reply

you are the one introducing the stern tone…..

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

i’m tired, what was the question again? your hopperness?

you’re the one telling the story…
and you posted the question in that reply

you are the one introducing the stern tone…..

what I posted was
“tbh, if the allegations were true, I’d hope the perpetrator got more than that, wouldn’t you?”

so my question is, if someone had committed the acts that were alleged, what punishment do you believe would be suitable?

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

you’re the one telling the story…
and you posted the question in that reply

you are the one introducing the stern tone…..

what I posted was
“tbh, if the allegations were true, I’d hope the perpetrator got more than that, wouldn’t you?”

so my question is, if someone had committed the acts that were alleged, what punishment do you believe would be suitable?

letting them get some bloody sleep.

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

you are the one introducing the stern tone…..

what I posted was
“tbh, if the allegations were true, I’d hope the perpetrator got more than that, wouldn’t you?”

so my question is, if someone had committed the acts that were alleged, what punishment do you believe would be suitable?

letting them get some bloody sleep.

so you believe it is ok to do that to somebody?

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

what I posted was
“tbh, if the allegations were true, I’d hope the perpetrator got more than that, wouldn’t you?”

so my question is, if someone had committed the acts that were alleged, what punishment do you believe would be suitable?

letting them get some bloody sleep.

so you believe it is ok to do that to somebody?

you have some sort of obsession with something I have no experience with. Nil familiarity with your subject let alone expertise.

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

letting them get some bloody sleep.

so you believe it is ok to do that to somebody?

you have some sort of obsession with something I have no experience with. Nil familiarity with your subject let alone expertise.

I was just interested on your opinion on it.

you have been cleared of it, so obviously the alegations made to the media are false, but you had an opinion on the punishment that would apply if they were true.

I believe they are too lenient, you believe otherwise, just interested in why

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

so you believe it is ok to do that to somebody?

you have some sort of obsession with something I have no experience with. Nil familiarity with your subject let alone expertise.

I was just interested on your opinion on it.

you have been cleared of it, so obviously the alegations made to the media are false, but you had an opinion on the punishment that would apply if they were true.

I believe they are too lenient, you believe otherwise, just interested in why

I think terrorists should be hunted down and at the very least(if they haven’t yet harmed a person) talked to with as much sternness as OHS regulation provides for.

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

so you believe it is ok to do that to somebody?

you have some sort of obsession with something I have no experience with. Nil familiarity with your subject let alone expertise.

I was just interested on your opinion on it.

you have been cleared of it, so obviously the alegations made to the media are false, but you had an opinion on the punishment that would apply if they were true.

I believe they are too lenient, you believe otherwise, just interested in why

A lot would depend on the persons mental state

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

you have some sort of obsession with something I have no experience with. Nil familiarity with your subject let alone expertise.

I was just interested on your opinion on it.

you have been cleared of it, so obviously the alegations made to the media are false, but you had an opinion on the punishment that would apply if they were true.

I believe they are too lenient, you believe otherwise, just interested in why

I think terrorists should be hunted down and at the very least(if they haven’t yet harmed a person) talked to with as much sternness as OHS regulation provides for.

i don’t believe terrorism comes into this at all

Cymek said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

you have some sort of obsession with something I have no experience with. Nil familiarity with your subject let alone expertise.

I was just interested on your opinion on it.

you have been cleared of it, so obviously the alegations made to the media are false, but you had an opinion on the punishment that would apply if they were true.

I believe they are too lenient, you believe otherwise, just interested in why

A lot would depend on the persons mental state

contributing factors. regard is allotted for allowing the possibility for an offender to return to the community

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

I was just interested on your opinion on it.

you have been cleared of it, so obviously the alegations made to the media are false, but you had an opinion on the punishment that would apply if they were true.

I believe they are too lenient, you believe otherwise, just interested in why

I think terrorists should be hunted down and at the very least(if they haven’t yet harmed a person) talked to with as much sternness as OHS regulation provides for.

i don’t believe terrorism comes into this at all

Anyone who apply’s fear over reason to resolve a dispute is a terrorist, in my honest opinionado…….

Any punishment assessment is akin to cutting a baby in half to appease two claimants to parenthood.

You might have at least removed an OP trivial subject to another thread.

Postpocelipse said:

You might have at least removed an OP trivial subject to another thread.

I mean dv and yourself both objected to the wandering from professional font

Postpocelipse said:

Any punishment assessment is akin to cutting a baby in half to appease two claimants to parenthood.

that makes no sense whatsoever

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

Any punishment assessment is akin to cutting a baby in half to appease two claimants to parenthood.

that makes no sense whatsoever

for me anyway……

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

Postpocelipse said:

Any punishment assessment is akin to cutting a baby in half to appease two claimants to parenthood.

that makes no sense whatsoever

for me anyway……

what I really said was “you serious? what do you want me ta bloody do? cut him in half or sumfin?”

Postpocelipse said:

Postpocelipse said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

that makes no sense whatsoever

for me anyway……

what I really said was “you serious? what do you want me ta bloody do? cut him in half or sumfin?”

Then wassy-MILF left with her bubble of light I says to the other stiffs “yeah keep a non-sleeping eye on that there banana-cakes-screw-ball-pants good’n proper and let all her neighbors whe’s got some sort of athletes brain thing going on and should be given tea and sweet bread whenever possibles”.

Think it went like that a bit.

Postpocelipse said:

Postpocelipse said:

Postpocelipse said:

for me anyway……

what I really said was “you serious? what do you want me ta bloody do? cut him in half or sumfin?”

Then wassy-MILF left with her bubble of light I says to the other stiffs “yeah keep a non-sleeping eye on that there banana-cakes-screw-ball-pants good’n proper and let all her neighbors know whe’s got some sort of athletes brain thing going on and should be given tea and sweet bread whenever possibles”.

Think it went like that a bit.

Never understood what all the fuss about that was. Shouldn’t you be goin? How tha hell does a flamin dispute like this get brought in? Flamin Galahs fa chrissakes!

Postpocelipse said:

CrazyNeutrino said:

Link?

There is a thread somewhere’s back on the subject. I’m super-tired right now so couldn’t be arsed looking it up.

Why start a thread if you cannot be arsed to look it up?

I did a quick search for “atom thick sheet of superfluid-state helium”

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=atom+thick+sheet+of+superfluid-state+helium

Anything relevant there?

CrazyNeutrino said:

Postpocelipse said:

CrazyNeutrino said:

Link?

There is a thread somewhere’s back on the subject. I’m super-tired right now so couldn’t be arsed looking it up.

Why start a thread if you cannot be arsed to look it up?

I did a quick search for “atom thick sheet of superfluid-state helium”

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=atom+thick+sheet+of+superfluid-state+helium

Anything relevant there?

It’s called dissemination of vital information. No that link is not related. There is genuinely a thread on the topic I posted that had minimal attention.

Have had a bit of a thinka-tink with this idea considering whether helium’s properties are incompatible. My conclusion is helium’s structure is ideal for taking advantage of tunnelling in this manner, locking the element into the centrifuge seat described with increasing strength as voltage rises.

Within a working model of the pre-described concept I expect the occurrence of a strong SR disparity imposed on the particles at the centre of the fuge and those at it’s perimeter, made exponential with increasing momentum.

The specific effects of this I am still considering but I assume at this point that two possibilities may present themselves. The first may be a monopolaric state imposed upon the components of the atoms augmented by the tunnelling effect. The second might be strong internalisation of electromagnetic field.

I think I’ll go and have a read and snooze and then think about getting the roast pork and veggies organized for tea a bit later.

The described centrifuge should be entirely constructed of superconducting material. With being brought down to superconducting temperature I have relied on the property of helium which allows it to pass through solid matter to allow the helium place atop the seat to relocate into the nano-cavities within the seat structure which should subsequently trap the particles in-situ due to the superconducting field. With this arrangement maintaining the super-fluid state of the helium one can then begin rotation of generator.

Postpocelipse said:

The described centrifuge should be entirely constructed of superconducting material. With being brought down to superconducting temperature.

I have relied on the property of helium which allows it to pass through solid matter to allow the helium place atop the seat to relocate into the nano-cavities within the seat structure through EM capillary action which should subsequently trap the particles in-situ due to the superconducting field’s augmentation through tunneling. With this arrangement maintaining the super-fluid state of the helium one can then begin rotation of generator.

It is expected the chambers within the nano-tubed seat should include the various elements as would be required to impose the tunnelling effect on the trapped helium.

Centrifuge Design Specifications

Carbon Nano-tube Wafer Seat with interior cavities shaped to trap helium atoms and subsequently maximising quantum tunnelling effects on suspended particles:

Questionable assumption includes whether or not an hypothesised arrangement matching this would automatically promote a stable super-fluid state on helium trapped in a disc shaped wafer seat with standard cooling arrangements currently in practice?_

Providing a positive answer to this first question allows the purpose of the centrifugal arrangement to be studied: Can the hypothesised stable battery state super-fluid assemblies voltage be raised with application of centrifugal force?