Examine the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonians(Orthodox Hebrew), Amorite Babylonians(Other Hebrew Denominations) and Egyptian cultures contemporary to the Roman Empire’s longevity?

Food For Thread Thought DAVID:

Adds up to 1006 in Roman Numerals

A Tuman, including it’s chain of command adds up to 1006 in Mongol Military Management

Collate other factors relative to military conquest either assessable under the number 1006 or the alphabetic reference in the name DAVID?

Postpocelipse said:

Examine the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonians(Orthodox Hebrew), Amorite Babylonians(Other Hebrew Denominations) and Egyptian cultures contemporary to the Roman Empire’s longevity?

Amorite Babylonian empire was 1894 to 1595 BC. Kassite Babylonian empire was 1595 to 1155 BC.

Roman empire was 27 BC to etc.

Therefore the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonian and Amorite Babylonian empires is zero, they missed each other by more than 1000 years!

Postpocelipse said:

DAVID: Adds up to 1006 in Roman Numerals

A is not a Roman Numeral.

mollwollfumble said:

Postpocelipse said:

Examine the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonians(Orthodox Hebrew), Amorite Babylonians(Other Hebrew Denominations) and Egyptian cultures contemporary to the Roman Empire’s longevity?

Amorite Babylonian empire was 1894 to 1595 BC. Kassite Babylonian empire was 1595 to 1155 BC.

Roman empire was 27 BC to etc.

Therefore the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonian and Amorite Babylonian empires is zero, they missed each other by more than 1000 years!

Postpocelipse said:

DAVID: Adds up to 1006 in Roman Numerals

A is not a Roman Numeral.

Which is why it isn’t part of the sum

Postpocelipse said:

mollwollfumble said:

Postpocelipse said:

Examine the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonians(Orthodox Hebrew), Amorite Babylonians(Other Hebrew Denominations) and Egyptian cultures contemporary to the Roman Empire’s longevity?

Amorite Babylonian empire was 1894 to 1595 BC. Kassite Babylonian empire was 1595 to 1155 BC.

Roman empire was 27 BC to etc.

Therefore the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonian and Amorite Babylonian empires is zero, they missed each other by more than 1000 years!

This was a question directly related to complex psychological assessment. Could you NOT contribute if you are going to deliberately supply what is not asked?

Postpocelipse said:

mollwollfumble said:

Postpocelipse said:

Examine the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonians(Orthodox Hebrew), Amorite Babylonians(Other Hebrew Denominations) and Egyptian cultures contemporary to the Roman Empire’s longevity?

Amorite Babylonian empire was 1894 to 1595 BC. Kassite Babylonian empire was 1595 to 1155 BC.

Roman empire was 27 BC to etc.

Therefore the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonian and Amorite Babylonian empires is zero, they missed each other by more than 1000 years!

Postpocelipse said:

DAVID: Adds up to 1006 in Roman Numerals

A is not a Roman Numeral.

Which is why it isn’t part of the sum

Then its not really the name DAVID its DVID

Cymek said:

Postpocelipse said:

mollwollfumble said:

A is not a Roman Numeral.

Which is why it isn’t part of the sum

Then its not really the name DAVID its DVID

It’s like I held up this card……

…..and you came up with that answer! Please respect the intention of the OP. If you haven’t understood that yet, don’t make yourself look like a stupid vandal….. please that would be awfully lovely of you!

Postpocelipse said:

Postpocelipse said:

mollwollfumble said:

Postpocelipse said:

Examine the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonians(Orthodox Hebrew), Amorite Babylonians(Other Hebrew Denominations) and Egyptian cultures contemporary to the Roman Empire’s longevity?

Amorite Babylonian empire was 1894 to 1595 BC. Kassite Babylonian empire was 1595 to 1155 BC.

Roman empire was 27 BC to etc.

Therefore the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonian and Amorite Babylonian empires is zero, they missed each other by more than 1000 years!

This was a question directly related to complex psychological assessment. Could you NOT contribute if you are going to deliberately supply what is not asked?

Not sure how the original question you asked is a complex psychological assessment, didn’t mollwollfumble answer the question by stating they are far removed in time from each other.

Cymek said:

Postpocelipse said:

Postpocelipse said:

mollwollfumble said:

Postpocelipse said:

Examine the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonians(Orthodox Hebrew), Amorite Babylonians(Other Hebrew Denominations) and Egyptian cultures contemporary to the Roman Empire’s longevity?

Amorite Babylonian empire was 1894 to 1595 BC. Kassite Babylonian empire was 1595 to 1155 BC.

Roman empire was 27 BC to etc.

Therefore the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonian and Amorite Babylonian empires is zero, they missed each other by more than 1000 years!

This was a question directly related to complex psychological assessment. Could you NOT contribute if you are going to deliberately supply what is not asked?

Not sure how the original question you asked is a complex psychological assessment, didn’t mollwollfumble answer the question by stating they are far removed in time from each other.

Not at all. The statement indicated preliminary evaluation of the greater OP subject, which is yet to be supplied as it is only controversial if not presented with greater examination of intent, which is yet to occur as this direction was made contemporary to the previous development by various contributed observations to questions on the Talmid thread. I will give it a little more clarity when I get to it.

Postpocelipse said:

Cymek said:

Postpocelipse said:

Amorite Babylonian empire was 1894 to 1595 BC. Kassite Babylonian empire was 1595 to 1155 BC.

Roman empire was 27 BC to etc.

Therefore the effects the Roman Empire had on Kassite Babylonian and Amorite Babylonian empires is zero, they missed each other by more than 1000 years!

This was a question directly related to complex psychological assessment. Could you NOT contribute if you are going to deliberately supply what is not asked?

Not sure how the original question you asked is a complex psychological assessment, didn’t mollwollfumble answer the question by stating they are far removed in time from each other.

Not at all. The statement indicated preliminary evaluation of the greater OP subject, which is yet to be supplied as it is only controversial if not presented with greater examination of intent, which is yet to occur as this direction was made contemporary to the previous development by various contributed observations to questions on the Talmid thread. I will give it a little more clarity when I get to it.

You will note that I have used ethnic origin to describe specific sects of the mid-east peoples religions of the day. Mollwollfumble’s question seems to intentionally ignore the obvious factors I was indicating assessment toward.

So…… that would be one Bad Jew on Moll’s account and a Bad Muslim on Cymek’s account. Anyone else collecting star stickers for my theological/psychological subject?

If you examined a cross whilst angry it would be a cross cross examination

Cymek said:

If you examined a cross whilst angry it would be a cross cross examination

If took an exam given by those who conquered you it would be an examination by the cross upon the cross. The point being?

Cannabis Does Not Do This, but Alcohol will

:)

CrazyNeutrino said:

Cannabis Does Not Do This, but Alcohol will

:)

Oh look!! CN gets thread credit! Who’da thunk it!!

Cheers bloke. ;)

Cymek said:

If you examined a cross whilst angry it would be a cross cross examination

if your name was chris it would be a chris cross cross examination

Arts said:

Cymek said:

If you examined a cross whilst angry it would be a cross cross examination

if your name was chris it would be a chris cross cross examination

poikilotherm said:

Arts said:

Cymek said:

If you examined a cross whilst angry it would be a cross cross examination

if your name was chris it would be a chris cross cross examination

wiggida wiggida wiggida wack..

wrong thread

Jesus was a bit selfish. He didn’t offer to resurrect the guys on the other crosses.

dv said:

!https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ab/89/cd/ab89cd16675778a1a832bde277162042.jpg

No, no, no. She said Chris.

dv said:

!https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ab/89/cd/ab89cd16675778a1a832bde277162042.jpg/quote]

is that an alien under the floorboards?

Arts said:

dv said:

!https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/ab/89/cd/ab89cd16675778a1a832bde277162042.jpg/quote]

is that an alien under the floorboards?

There is always one hiding somewhere……..

Divine Angel said:

Jesus was a bit selfish. He didn’t offer to resurrect the guys on the other crosses.

wanted all the easter eggs for himself…

Postpocelipse said:

CrazyNeutrino said:

Cannabis Does Not Do This, but Alcohol will

:)

Oh look!! CN gets thread credit! Who’da thunk it!!

Cheers bloke. ;)

Marcel Marceau: the early years

poikilotherm said:

Arts said:

Cymek said:

If you examined a cross whilst angry it would be a cross cross examination

if your name was chris it would be a chris cross cross examination

How high?

dv said:

Postpocelipse said:

CrazyNeutrino said:

Cannabis Does Not Do This, but Alcohol will

:)

Oh look!! CN gets thread credit! Who’da thunk it!!

Cheers bloke. ;)

Marcel Marceau: the early years

He’s the original Where’s Wally if you look long enough at pre-color photos……..

Michael V said:

poikilotherm said:

Arts said:

if your name was chris it would be a chris cross cross examination

How high?

Can we not leave the ground and just do yoga instead?

Postpocelipse said:

Michael V said:

poikilotherm said:

How high?

Can we not leave the ground and just do yoga instead?

Ultimate non-samana prana.

Michael V said:

Postpocelipse said:

Michael V said:

How high?

Can we not leave the ground and just do yoga instead?

Ultimate non-samana prana.

I want that on a shirt. Haven’t figured out what it means yet but it just sounds cool!

Postpocelipse said:

Michael V said:

Postpocelipse said:

Can we not leave the ground and just do yoga instead?

Ultimate non-samana prana.

I want that on a shirt. Haven’t figured out what it means yet but it just sounds cool!

Samana is the levitation prana in the Yogic tradition.

You wanted to not leave the ground and just do Yoga.

Michael V said:

Postpocelipse said:

Michael V said:

Ultimate non-samana prana.

I want that on a shirt. Haven’t figured out what it means yet but it just sounds cool!

Samana is the levitation prana in the Yogic tradition.

You wanted to not leave the ground and just do Yoga.

Yes I understand the elements only have difficulty mentally perceiving the product of the aggregate due to a minimum of sleep since last night. I still want it on a shirt

Postpocelipse said:

Michael V said:

Postpocelipse said:

I want that on a shirt. Haven’t figured out what it means yet but it just sounds cool!

Samana is the levitation prana in the Yogic tradition.

You wanted to not leave the ground and just do Yoga.

Yes I understand the elements only have difficulty mentally perceiving the product of the aggregate due to a minimum of sleep since last night. I still want it on a shirt

The word Yoga’s basic meaning is ‘to do’. This can be broadly interpreted in your reference. I was trying to avoid allowing the phrase to fire up a somewhat fatigue depleted imagination.

Remember how I’ve mentioned I came here to practice creative writing for therapeutic purposes? Have my intentions visibly changed because the assumptions appear to have remained unchanged?

Postpocelipse said:

Remember how I’ve mentioned I came here to practice creative writing for therapeutic purposes? Have my intentions visibly changed because the assumptions appear to have remained unchanged?

I think you will eventually get some medical help, maybe involuntarily, and read back on your crazy in the coconut ramblings with utter bafflement about what you are blathering on about.

AwesomeO said:

Postpocelipse said:

Remember how I’ve mentioned I came here to practice creative writing for therapeutic purposes? Have my intentions visibly changed because the assumptions appear to have remained unchanged?

I think you will eventually get some medical help, maybe involuntarily, and read back on your crazy in the coconut ramblings with utter bafflement about what you are blathering on about.

Then I say that is a sign of your not thinking. I will very certainly proceed to unravel the questions I have variously presented. Until I provided a memory dump I was not able to properly compare the gathered information. We are only machines with limits dictated by circumstance. If you have either an observation or question relevant to the supplied subject, do go on.

Postpocelipse said:

AwesomeO said:

Postpocelipse said:

Remember how I’ve mentioned I came here to practice creative writing for therapeutic purposes? Have my intentions visibly changed because the assumptions appear to have remained unchanged?

I think you will eventually get some medical help, maybe involuntarily, and read back on your crazy in the coconut ramblings with utter bafflement about what you are blathering on about.

Then I say that is a sign of your not thinking. I will very certainly proceed to unravel the questions I have variously presented. Until I provided a memory dump I was not able to properly compare the gathered information. We are only machines with limits dictated by circumstance. If you have either an observation or question relevant to the supplied subject, do go on.

Couldn’t be bothered. Your mania far exceeds my interest and stamina.

AwesomeO said:

Postpocelipse said:

Remember how I’ve mentioned I came here to practice creative writing for therapeutic purposes? Have my intentions visibly changed because the assumptions appear to have remained unchanged?

I think you will eventually get some medical help, maybe involuntarily, and read back on your crazy in the coconut ramblings with utter bafflement about what you are blathering on about.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x12v7s8_206-the-nightmare-of-milky-joe_fun

AwesomeO said:

Postpocelipse said:

AwesomeO said:

I think you will eventually get some medical help, maybe involuntarily, and read back on your crazy in the coconut ramblings with utter bafflement about what you are blathering on about.

Then I say that is a sign of your not thinking. I will very certainly proceed to unravel the questions I have variously presented. Until I provided a memory dump I was not able to properly compare the gathered information. We are only machines with limits dictated by circumstance. If you have either an observation or question relevant to the supplied subject, do go on.

Couldn’t be bothered. Your mania far exceeds my interest and stamina.

Is that so? Why do you then feel obliged to contribute such irrelevant data to otherwise functional subjects?

AwesomeO said:

Postpocelipse said:

AwesomeO said:

I think you will eventually get some medical help, maybe involuntarily, and read back on your crazy in the coconut ramblings with utter bafflement about what you are blathering on about.

Then I say that is a sign of your not thinking. I will very certainly proceed to unravel the questions I have variously presented. Until I provided a memory dump I was not able to properly compare the gathered information. We are only machines with limits dictated by circumstance. If you have either an observation or question relevant to the supplied subject, do go on.

Couldn’t be bothered. Your mania far exceeds my interest and stamina.

don’t bother postie I’ve already worn awesome down to a nub on this forum , he’s got no more strength

Postpocelipse said:

AwesomeO said:

Postpocelipse said:

Then I say that is a sign of your not thinking. I will very certainly proceed to unravel the questions I have variously presented. Until I provided a memory dump I was not able to properly compare the gathered information. We are only machines with limits dictated by circumstance. If you have either an observation or question relevant to the supplied subject, do go on.

Couldn’t be bothered. Your mania far exceeds my interest and stamina.

Is that so? Why do you then feel obliged to contribute such irrelevant data to otherwise functional subjects?

Not obliged, just happy to contribute where I want and how I want.

wookiemeister said:

AwesomeO said:

Postpocelipse said:

Remember how I’ve mentioned I came here to practice creative writing for therapeutic purposes? Have my intentions visibly changed because the assumptions appear to have remained unchanged?

I think you will eventually get some medical help, maybe involuntarily, and read back on your crazy in the coconut ramblings with utter bafflement about what you are blathering on about.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x12v7s8_206-the-nightmare-of-milky-joe_fun

Perhaps my epitaph should read “I didn’t bother answering the questions I had or having any fun in the process because AwesomeO The Maleficent disproved”?

AwesomeO said:

Postpocelipse said:

AwesomeO said:

Couldn’t be bothered. Your mania far exceeds my interest and stamina.

Is that so? Why do you then feel obliged to contribute such irrelevant data to otherwise functional subjects?

Not obliged, just happy to contribute where I want and how I want.

Yeah cause it’s all about you I’ve gathered. You must be dear to your family.

wookiemeister said:

AwesomeO said:

Postpocelipse said:

Then I say that is a sign of your not thinking. I will very certainly proceed to unravel the questions I have variously presented. Until I provided a memory dump I was not able to properly compare the gathered information. We are only machines with limits dictated by circumstance. If you have either an observation or question relevant to the supplied subject, do go on.

Couldn’t be bothered. Your mania far exceeds my interest and stamina.

don’t bother postie I’ve already worn awesome down to a nub on this forum , he’s got no more strength

Appreciate the shoulder boulder but he seems to have missed the fact that as many times as they step up I just knock them back down……..

Now I have to reinvent this thread to properly address the assessment it intended. Sorry aboot that laddies!

Postpocelipse said:

wookiemeister said:

AwesomeO said:

I think you will eventually get some medical help, maybe involuntarily, and read back on your crazy in the coconut ramblings with utter bafflement about what you are blathering on about.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x12v7s8_206-the-nightmare-of-milky-joe_fun

Perhaps my epitaph should read “I didn’t bother answering the questions I had or having any fun in the process because AwesomeO The Maleficent disproved”?

I don’t dissaprove. I am the first to defend any ones right to be an arseclown. I was addressing your point re have your intentions changed, and I suggest yes, because you are at the moment being a mentalist. I have also previously suggested you check your posts from a. I think ago to your posts over the last week or so. And there has been a big change, I cannot speak to your intentions, I don’t think you want to be an arse clown, in your mind you are utterly brilliant and interesting posting great insights.

AwesomeO said:

Postpocelipse said:

wookiemeister said:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x12v7s8_206-the-nightmare-of-milky-joe_fun

Perhaps my epitaph should read “I didn’t bother answering the questions I had or having any fun in the process because AwesomeO The Maleficent disproved”?

I don’t dissaprove. I am the first to defend any ones right to be an arseclown. I was addressing your point re have your intentions changed, and I suggest yes, because you are at the moment being a mentalist. I have also previously suggested you check your posts from a. I think ago to your posts over the last week or so. And there has been a big change, I cannot speak to your intentions, I don’t think you want to be an arse clown, in your mind you are utterly brilliant and interesting posting great insights.

“chat chat chat chitty-chitty chat-chat”

chat chat……

Look out!

……………………………………………………………………………….*

Q: What is a cross raised on a hill?
A: A bullseye

Can you dispose of this depleted decoy now please Corporal?

Memory Conditioning and Cue Based Suggestion Development.

“Fehl geshtig gafahlngernblern, dishtate pelgigig Fer-Winkle. Meu werty-flerty-birt-geHEEERPbe flarm flarm!

GaA gaArtTbig!

Poker bashtample, fu-huh-huh-huuh-huh! Blatt-a-frRg!!

So! B’der t’mpla gerby flah gah? Meds webble gib fudd ishKa fludom got byfruggles!

Ashtige?

Milo Kerrigan is still studying for the bar………

Postpocelipse said:

Milo Kerrigan is still studying for the bar………

Judging by his speech ability, I’d suggest he’s done enough studying at the bar.

JTQ said:

Postpocelipse said:

Milo Kerrigan is still studying for the bar………

Judging by his speech ability, I’d suggest he’s done enough studying at the bar.

Pay that soldier!

I was sitting in the audience of Full Frontal in 1997 (I knew the guy at Channel 7 that sent out tickets and he kept sending me more), and in one episode Milo Kerrigan did his part.

At the very beginning of filming, just before they started, the whole cast came out and introduced themselves. Shaun Micallef included a short part, doing Milo’s voice as well.

Wish I had somehow recorded it, because now I don’t remember what it was that was said, but remember it was really funny… and wasn’t recorded for the show, it was just an impromptu thing for the audience.

JTQ said:

I was sitting in the audience of Full Frontal in 1997 (I knew the guy at Channel 7 that sent out tickets and he kept sending me more), and in one episode Milo Kerrigan did his part.

At the very beginning of filming, just before they started, the whole cast came out and introduced themselves. Shaun Micallef included a short part, doing Milo’s voice as well.

Wish I had somehow recorded it, because now I don’t remember what it was that was said, but remember it was really funny… and wasn’t recorded for the show, it was just an impromptu thing for the audience.

Micallef is a long time favourite in the razor wit department.

Fa Farks sake, how many times do yas need me to come out here and explain what is so fukin plain and simple?

If yas go and legalise guns, how-tha-fuck do you tell the crims from the prims? It just doesn’t make sense!

If I’m pointing this gun at you and guns are legal, I can’t even legally pull the trigga unless you’re a genuine threat!

Get it through ya head! Guns are fa crims!