Would the high AM of the pre-collision Earth have maintained a stronger EM field?

With mantle materials that are lighter than core materials, do lighter mantle materials apply drag against core AM?

ie; would the sudden liquefaction of mantle materials allow a denser core to spin faster(once again elevating EM field output)?

I ask these questions because the off-centring of the outer-inner core to the original alignment does not seem like it should have happened slowly…

Had this portion of the core been significantly liquefied so that it was mixed with the rest of the mantle and then resettled should it not have found re-alignment taking this route?

Shouldn’t it make more sense that the off-centring occurred in the moment of impact and was facilitated by strain produced against the EM field forcing?

Could probably clarify these questions more appropriately but my reference language for EM phenomena is limited…..

Postpocelipse said:

my reference language is limited…..

nods

roughbarked said:

Postpocelipse said:

my reference language is limited…..

nods

wow. love the condescending patronisation there………. thanks cunt…….

it is the land of cuntship isn’t it?

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

Postpocelipse said:

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

I feel just like the soggy sao in the middle. How illuminating…….

Postpocelipse said:

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

I’m more of a soggy Sao person myself

Cymek said:

Postpocelipse said:

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

I’m more of a soggy Sao person myself

Well you are about the only person I’d expect to have the losing dignity to eat it.

Would metals in the core seperate out due to the core spinning

Cymek said:

Would metals in the core seperate out due to the core spinning

At high centrifugal rates you might think they would huh?

Postpocelipse said:

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

Not all of us thanks Post.

Tamb said:

Postpocelipse said:

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

Not all of us thanks Post.

Yeah come on I’d expect you to know who you are if you haven’t been a part of this shit come on.

Postpocelipse said:

Cymek said:

Would metals in the core seperate out due to the core spinning

At high centrifugal rates you might think they would huh?

That’s what I was wondering

Cymek said:

Postpocelipse said:

Cymek said:

Would metals in the core seperate out due to the core spinning

At high centrifugal rates you might think they would huh?

That’s what I was wondering

Allows for a stiffer outer-inner core that could shift off centre in an impact would seem.

oh i finally got it

spin and gravity and clouds

‘u can see where it all is going

Postpocelipse said:

roughbarked said:

Postpocelipse said:

my reference language is limited…..

nods

wow. love the condescending patronisation there………. thanks cunt…….

I don’t have one of those.

SCIENCE said:

oh i finally got it

spin and gravity and clouds

‘u can see where it all is going

Someone hallucinating?

Postpocelipse said:

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

Im usually Octahedron

sometimes I morph into another shapes

Irregular Quadrilateral when angry

sometimes Tetrahedron when around other people

Reuleaux Triangle when relaxed

CrazyNeutrino said:

Postpocelipse said:

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

Im usually Octahedron

sometimes I morph into another shapes

Irregular Quadrilateral when angry

sometimes Tetrahedron when around other people

Reuleaux Triangle when relaxed

I have been accused of being a Möbius strip. Limited dimentionaly but endless.

CrazyNeutrino said:

Postpocelipse said:

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

Im usually Octahedron

sometimes I morph into another shapes

Irregular Quadrilateral when angry

sometimes Tetrahedron when around other people

Reuleaux Triangle when relaxed

How kaleidescopic…….

Tamb said:

CrazyNeutrino said:

Postpocelipse said:

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

Im usually Octahedron

sometimes I morph into another shapes

Irregular Quadrilateral when angry

sometimes Tetrahedron when around other people

Reuleaux Triangle when relaxed

I have been accused of being a Möbius strip. Limited dimentionaly but endless.

Sometimes I’m nearly Lemniscate.

You never lemniscate, not even just an inch. But you’re always there every time I’m in a pinch

Postpocelipse said:

CrazyNeutrino said:

Postpocelipse said:

what a bunch of circle-jerks you all seem to be

Im usually Octahedron

sometimes I morph into another shapes

Irregular Quadrilateral when angry

sometimes Tetrahedron when around other people

Reuleaux Triangle when relaxed

How kaleidescopic…….

I have around 20+ Kaleidoscopic Android Apps

some are pre programmed

others use the camera to change shape

dv indicated a series of tectonic eras leading to pangea and if there is some assumption I have disputed this this is mistaken.

What I have assumed is simply that material density governs momentum and this will have defined the manner in which the original impact occurred between mantle and core collisions and how the impact wave resettled.

I have assumed impact debris formed various islands of density that was subsequently sifted through core convection as material originating from the outer shell of the core settled back towards it’s approximate original position. This occurred as the tectonic eras preceding pangea.

With these earlier eras lighter material that happened to fall back on the core first has risen to the surface and exposed the various impact features that displaced these materials to begin with.

The convection of these tectonic eras has not significantly displaced the central sink like feature that promotes the marianis trench. Here I have made the assumption that the impact left an indent on the core that has not filled in completely.

I have assumed it has taken this long to reveal the materials that coincided with the entry and exit of the impact mass. Were features marking the entry and exit of the impact body to be inevitably visible the Siberian Traps and Australian continent seem perfectly reasonable suspects due to their particular histories, material compounds and angular incident to each other relative to the Marianis Trench.

I have also questioned whether the AM of our core at the time of impact will have maintained a high EM out put that shielded it from the initial mantle concussion and provided the core with a surface tension that made it significantly stiffer at that degree of centrifugal force.

so what has been answered specifically?

i think you’ve covered just about everything.

JudgeMental said:

i think you’ve covered just about everything.

oh…… um…. does that mean I can go visit Uluru and feel fairly certain I’m touching some moon?

Would be nice if life were simple enough I could just choose to find a little piece of suitable aussie sandstone to study for a while…..

I love it. The aus continent/Uluru is the pimple from the light materials core infection earth got with the impact. How appropriate for a nation of pimple poppers……

Figured out where India came from with it’s tangent to the position of the ding in the core. It should be the spray-out materials of the core impact itself.

Maybe Tut’s meteorite dagger is a good analogy to the problem of the moon body deflecting of the earth’s core. Either projectiles core will have been the oldest densest materials either had accumulated.

The deflection caused the outer shell to sheer from the inner core and dissipate deflection energy as the impact violently decreased the rotation of either body. It seems fairly obvious the greater portion of the core as whole survived the event.

The problem with filling in the ding it left in the core’s outer shell is the same question as knowing repairing a ding in the best meteorite wrought blade will never truly take. As the more diluted impact materials settled the ding will likely have contributed violent episodes to the tectonic ages of the globe.

The question of what materials replaced the original at the point the impact debris re-congealed to a planetary body and how quickly convection will have replaced lighter materials to whatever alloy it resembles presently is not one I know how to tackle…….

After having a look at the Olga’s features in comparison to Uluru I have to conclude that a projectile with significantly greater escape velocity than the moons core material first exited the Earth’s debris field at the moment of core impact. I cannot determine from sight whether more than one piece exited this point but do suspect that the trajectory of this mass made return to Earth inevitable.

Exactly how much greater is the moon’s momentum than escape velocity?

Postpocelipse said:

Exactly how much greater is the moon’s momentum than escape velocity?

Should be able to figure out between that and the other factors of either body in the collision how much got spat out.

moon velocity 1.022km/s
escape velocity of the Earth 11.2km/s

dunno what the EV is at the Moon distance but it’s orbital velocity can’t be more, for obvious reasons. plus what has momentum got to do with it?

ChrispenEvan said:

moon velocity 1.022km/s
escape velocity of the Earth 11.2km/s

dunno what the EV is at the Moon distance but it’s orbital velocity can’t be more, for obvious reasons. plus what has momentum got to do with it?

I’m not familiar with how to separate the points of impact mathematically so just trying to start somewhere.