Rather than having distinguishably modern features(and I say that loosely) the Egyptian and Babylonian societies started out with record keeping traditions of questionable worth as public reference for the pooling of knowledge of socially global worth.
With the exploits of Temujin Borjigin being the best contemporary reference for the word of mouth lineages represented by Ghandhas 4000 years ago it is reasonable to conclude that this tradition of the oriental plains peoples was at least influenced by the Brahmic traditions that preceded them by 2000 years.
The Borjigin family had been strongly tied with the Mongol Confederacy, a similar council as will have been present for Ghandas to dominate, before Temujin’s intercedence in history. His method of diplomacy with first the eastern Chinese and then the Muslim population of his time indicates a significant awareness of the histories of both his and their cultures.
As the Greeks forum tradition reflects that of the tent traditions of the oriental plainsmen in it’s democracy and respect for ancestral tales it can be fairly concluded that the more effective method of record keeping originated with oriental style public debate rather than the African continents efforts alongside that of the now Semitic peoples.
Although I began this research out of interest in the origins of the Minoan peoples and their possible connections with the south, what I have found leaves me with a more educated comprehension of the origins of modern politics and questions that follow in this regard.
How much does western capitalism and it’s political marketing counterpart reflect the less effective Afro-Arab origins of government management?
How much advantage does eastern(Indo-Communist) capitalism have over the Euro-US version in the coming years?
Can the current oriental capitalism be used to eliminate the violence of the inter-religious factions that revolve around the Mediterranean and mid-east with only economic strategy?