A classic formula for pi has been discovered hidden in hydrogen atoms

This fundamental primordial component of the universe includes in it’s form the primary equation that maths and science has developed around. Together with the Golden Ratio, Pi regulates the universe through it’s most basic component.

This gives Michio Kaku’s conclusion that quantum strings are the mind of god a degree of definition that throws light on the philosophical content of the question of the existence of a universal deity. The contemporary question seems to focus on disproof in what has to be a vain attempt to beat sense into terrorists and church paedophiles with the tomes of science. I admit these records currently far outweigh the scriptures in sheer tonnage but psychology just isn’t this bluntly dealt with I have to observe.

With these fundamental components to approach the age old question with, is there a more diplomatic approach to the god question than the farcical debate that has been popular since the web got started?

Admittedly, the specimen of ‘believer’ debate I encountered flogging their flyers went something like, “the bible could not have been written by humans”. It made me feel some awkward sympathy for the guy but maybe through the connivance of the scientific community an image of god might be provided to popular culture that provided a contemporary perspective without cultural bias?

Postpocelipse said:

A classic formula for pi has been discovered hidden in hydrogen atoms

This fundamental primordial component of the universe includes in it’s form the primary equation that maths and science has developed around. Together with the Golden Ratio, Pi regulates the universe through it’s most basic component.

This gives Michio Kaku’s conclusion that quantum strings are the mind of god a degree of definition that throws light on the philosophical content of the question of the existence of a universal deity. The contemporary question seems to focus on disproof in what has to be a vain attempt to beat sense into terrorists and church paedophiles with the tomes of science. I admit these records currently far outweigh the scriptures in sheer tonnage but psychology just isn’t this bluntly dealt with I have to observe.

With these fundamental components to approach the age old question with, is there a more diplomatic approach to the god question than the farcical debate that has been popular since the web got started?

Admittedly, the specimen of ‘believer’ debate I encountered flogging their flyers went something like, “the bible could not have been written by humans”. It made me feel some awkward sympathy for the guy but maybe through the connivance of the scientific community an image of god might be provided to popular culture that provided a contemporary perspective without cultural bias?

If god does exists perhaps its more like an abstract concept or a mathematical equation that explains life, the universe and everything, its like an echo of the big bang.

The God concept also seems to have been created to make us feel unique like for some reason it takes an interest in humans and offers us eternal life if only by gosh darn we believe and be good. I do wonder if we encounter sentient aliens how religion would react, we aren’t the only ones out there and whilst special aren’t unique anymore, would they like that.

Can’t get the article, but the Wallis formula for pi is given by.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/WallisFormula.html

2*2*4*4*6*6*8*8
—————————————— • • •
1*3*3*5*5*7*7*9

I know Wallis as the chap who invented the symbol for infinity in his book on conic sections.

mollwollfumble said:

Can’t get the article, but the Wallis formula for pi is given by.
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/WallisFormula.html

2*2*4*4*6*6*8*8
—————————————— • • •
1*3*3*5*5*7*7*9

I know Wallis as the chap who invented the symbol for infinity in his book on conic sections.

Both remarkable for differing reasons.

I’m off to make dinner.

If buffy peeps in: Sister and her husband had Dolly put down today. Sister was still a little torn both ways but husband was emphatic. The vets said it was a very sensible decision.

Now they’re both sad of course but also hugely relieved.

oops, sorry