Date: 16/06/2016 18:01:14
From: transition
ID: 908827
Subject: radio in a contracting universe

do radio waves propagate the same, and would our radio equipment work

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 18:09:09
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 908831
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

yes. the speed of light is the same in all frames of reference. just the frequency would shift. towards blue i would think, seeing how the reverse is true in this expanding universe.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 18:09:49
From: Bubblecar
ID: 908832
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

transition said:


do radio waves propagate the same, and would our radio equipment work

Can’t see why not.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 18:13:06
From: transition
ID: 908837
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

I wanna know for sure.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 18:13:38
From: Bubblecar
ID: 908838
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

transition said:


I wanna know for sure.

Why?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 18:17:40
From: Bubblecar
ID: 908847
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

Stephen Hawking used to think time would go backwards in a contracting universe, but changed his mind.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 18:19:12
From: transition
ID: 908850
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

Bubblecar said:


transition said:

I wanna know for sure.

Why?

preparedness, wanna upgrade me alfoil hat

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 18:19:38
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 908852
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

Bubblecar said:


Stephen Hawking used to think time would go backwards in a contracting universe, but changed his mind.

I could never understand that view.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 18:21:33
From: Bubblecar
ID: 908856
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

ChrispenEvan said:


Bubblecar said:

Stephen Hawking used to think time would go backwards in a contracting universe, but changed his mind.

I could never understand that view.

It did seem a rather basic mistake to ignore thermodynamics.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 18:22:17
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 908857
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

Yes, the arrow of time and all that.

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 19:33:23
From: Postpocelipse
ID: 908872
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

How long would the universe take to shrink to an incoherent mess of energy if it shrunk at the same rate it is now expanding after the BB?

Reply Quote

Date: 16/06/2016 21:39:25
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 908912
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

transition said:


I wanna know for sure.

For sure. The universe would have to be contracting for a very long time before Olbers Paradox kicked in and fried everyone, and even then radio would continue to work until the radio set melted.

Postpocelipse said:


How long would the universe take to shrink to an incoherent mess of energy if it shrunk at the same rate it is now expanding after the BB?

I might be able to answer that. I’ll think about it.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2016 00:18:13
From: transition
ID: 908970
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

there’d be a lot more EMR noise

i’m not sure radio would work in a contracting universe, or in some contracting area of space.

I’d expect the sorta impedance of space’d be different too, so all those antennas, whatever’t is they couple into (the aether), it’d be different.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2016 00:46:09
From: Bubblecar
ID: 908976
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

transition said:


there’d be a lot more EMR noise

i’m not sure radio would work in a contracting universe, or in some contracting area of space.

I’d expect the sorta impedance of space’d be different too, so all those antennas, whatever’t is they couple into (the aether), it’d be different.

We’ll need the detailed model before passing judgment, and you’ll have to show your working.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2016 07:46:42
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 909003
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

there’d be a lot more EMR noise

i’m not sure radio would work in a contracting universe, or in some contracting area of space.

I’d expect the sorta impedance of space’d be different too, so all those antennas, whatever’t is they couple into (the aether), it’d be different.

a) why?

b) Why?

c) Why? Radio works fine in an expanding universe. there is no “ether”. antennas are “coupled” to the emr field. Space would just be getting smaller so wavelength will get shifted to the blue.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2016 09:33:54
From: transition
ID: 909024
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

a) why?

because the noise floor somewhere between >100-400meg? (depending what you’re doing) stops being local noise, or isn’t mostly local noise?

b) Why?

c) Why? Radio works fine in an expanding universe. there is no “ether”. antennas are “coupled” to the emr field. Space would just be getting smaller so wavelength will get shifted to the blue.

space has an characteristic impedance, or equivalant impedance?

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2016 09:45:48
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 909028
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

because the noise floor somewhere between >100-400meg?

how would a contracting universe affect this?

space has an characteristic impedance, or equivalant impedance?

space has vacuum permeability or magnetic constant and the vacuum permittivity or electric constant, this gives us the speed of light in a vacuum. so if these don’t change, and we have no reason to believe so as the SoL hasn’t changed from the BB. as far as we know.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2016 09:49:23
From: transition
ID: 909029
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impedance_of_free_space

so would dipoles and end-fed antennas be optimized the same legth in a contracting universe, and would transmission lines be optimally 50 ohm, 300 etc.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2016 10:13:46
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 909045
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

a contracting universe wouldn’t affect our radio transmission for the same reasons the expanding ones don’t, the expansion is only evident on large scales, megaparsecs, and non-gravitationally bound objects within the universe.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2016 13:33:35
From: transition
ID: 909091
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

ChrispenEvan said:


a contracting universe wouldn’t affect our radio transmission for the same reasons the expanding ones don’t, the expansion is only evident on large scales, megaparsecs, and non-gravitationally bound objects within the universe.

dunno, but do reckon there’d be a lot more radio noise, the sky’d be lit up at night, so there’d be more EMR noise.

Reply Quote

Date: 17/06/2016 13:36:17
From: dv
ID: 909092
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

In a contracting universe, radio waves work the same, locally, but the incoming flux of radio waves from elsewhere would be higher.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/06/2016 20:35:42
From: transition
ID: 909647
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

dv said:


In a contracting universe, radio waves work the same, locally, but the incoming flux of radio waves from elsewhere would be higher.

i’m still not sure of the former.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/06/2016 20:41:45
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 909654
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

oh well. unless you have some reasoning behind it it don’t count for much.

Reply Quote

Date: 18/06/2016 20:56:18
From: transition
ID: 909669
Subject: re: radio in a contracting universe

ChrispenEvan said:


oh well. unless you have some reasoning behind it it don’t count for much.

Doesn’t count for much any way, mate. Good isn’t‘t.

Reply Quote