Date: 13/09/2016 12:43:41
From: pesce.del.giorno
ID: 954552
Subject: drones

You know those big camera-bearing drones – they are about 80 cm across and have 4 motors, one at each corner. I’m not sure how much they weigh but it must be several kilos. What happens if one of the motors fails? I’m guessing it would descend uncontrollably in a rapid spiral. What happens if it flies beyond the range of the transmitter? Does it shut down and drop like a rock, or fly around randomly until the battery gives out, and then drop like a rock?

How long before somebody is seriously injured or even killed by a drone strike? Could they be weaponised to inflict GBH or severe property damage on your victim? Is there any legislation pertaining to drones? Are they registered so that if someone is injured by one, the owner can be traced?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 13:14:33
From: party_pants
ID: 954554
Subject: re: drones

a helicopter rotor should auto-rotate if it is descending unpowered, which should provide some lift and slow it down for a “soft” landing

.. in theory – but the torque effects need to be taken into account. Not sure that if one engines fails the others will cut out too. Also if they all rotate in the same direction the torque will start the body of the drone spinning and the braking effect of the auto-rotation will be lost.

It’s complicated :)

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 13:18:21
From: Tamb
ID: 954555
Subject: re: drones

party_pants said:


a helicopter rotor should auto-rotate if it is descending unpowered, which should provide some lift and slow it down for a “soft” landing

.. in theory – but the torque effects need to be taken into account. Not sure that if one engines fails the others will cut out too. Also if they all rotate in the same direction the torque will start the body of the drone spinning and the braking effect of the auto-rotation will be lost.

It’s complicated :)


The rotors probably contra-rotate to stop torque steer.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 13:46:35
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 954558
Subject: re: drones

they have auto descend if beyond transmitter range or get low on batteries. some have auto return. with 4 or more rotors they would still be controllable if one failed.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 15:06:55
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 954605
Subject: re: drones

pesce.del.giorno said:


You know those big camera-bearing drones – they are about 80 cm across and have 4 motors, one at each corner. I’m not sure how much they weigh but it must be several kilos. What happens if one of the motors fails? I’m guessing it would descend uncontrollably in a rapid spiral. What happens if it flies beyond the range of the transmitter? Does it shut down and drop like a rock, or fly around randomly until the battery gives out, and then drop like a rock?

How long before somebody is seriously injured or even killed by a drone strike? Could they be weaponised to inflict GBH or severe property damage on your victim? Is there any legislation pertaining to drones? Are they registered so that if someone is injured by one, the owner can be traced?

All these things are easily found with a search.
But, as I have owned a few for years I’ll answer anyway. The larger quadcopters are easily 10 kg or so. Sometimes more. If one of the motors fails you don’t have a lot of control, it’s generally a wobbly trip straight down, to a controlled crash. The hexacopters fare much better, the later firmware (typically) lets you still have pretty reasonable control. On mine, I can still keep it airborne no probs though it spins on the spot in mid-air.
They almost always have some kind of fail-safe for either returning (if they have a GPS on-board) or as mentioned an autonomous landing.

Yes there will be a time were someone does get hurt by a larger one, they have a lot of energy in the choppy blades and can do a lot of damage. The rules for using them can be found on the CASA website.
It would be very easy to use one as a weapon at quite a reasonable range, though I’m not going to describe how to do that here.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 15:34:07
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 954615
Subject: re: drones

It would be very easy to use one as a weapon at quite a reasonable range, though I’m not going to describe how to do that here.

but the larger ones are capable of lifting a dropbear…

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 16:21:20
From: Dropbear
ID: 954640
Subject: re: drones

ChrispenEvan said:


It would be very easy to use one as a weapon at quite a reasonable range, though I’m not going to describe how to do that here.

but the larger ones are capable of lifting a dropbear…

ORLY?

one of my mates in the coast guard has a DJ Phantom 3.. nice unit, takes great video. Simple to fly.. and as Boris said in an earlier post, it comes back to the take off GPS position if it loses radio signal.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:18:56
From: pesce.del.giorno
ID: 954664
Subject: re: drones

They seem like a ridiculously simple, obvious and untraceable means of delivering a remotely detonated explosive device.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:21:25
From: Dropbear
ID: 954667
Subject: re: drones

pesce.del.giorno said:


They seem like a ridiculously simple, obvious and untraceable means of delivering a remotely detonated explosive device.

The payload is small but I guess if it’s C4 then it can be.. I imagine at significant VIP events, the wireless frequencies are jammed

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:25:21
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 954670
Subject: re: drones

I looked into them for sitting on my arse and checking on cattle nad trees across fencing etc but you pay good money for one that has a fly time of just 20 minutes, then you have to put them on a charger for 5 hours.
Nah better to get off your arse.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:30:06
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 954671
Subject: re: drones

I looked into them for sitting on my arse and checking on cattle nads…

WHAT???!!!

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:30:25
From: Dropbear
ID: 954672
Subject: re: drones

Peak Warming Man said:


I looked into them for sitting on my arse and checking on cattle nad trees across fencing etc but you pay good money for one that has a fly time of just 20 minutes, then you have to put them on a charger for 5 hours.
Nah better to get off your arse.

They charge in an hour

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:33:24
From: poikilotherm
ID: 954673
Subject: re: drones

Peak Warming Man said:


I looked into them for sitting on my arse and checking on cattle nad

Can’t you find something weird like that with google?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:34:24
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 954675
Subject: re: drones

Dropbear said:


Peak Warming Man said:

I looked into them for sitting on my arse and checking on cattle nad trees across fencing etc but you pay good money for one that has a fly time of just 20 minutes, then you have to put them on a charger for 5 hours.
Nah better to get off your arse.

They charge in an hour

the company I used in Tas to take aerial photos for drawing up irrigation plans charged by the hour alright… $330/hour…

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:39:38
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 954678
Subject: re: drones

poikilotherm said:


Peak Warming Man said:

I looked into them for sitting on my arse and checking on cattle nad

Can’t you find something weird like that with google?

yeah use Google street view

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:40:52
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 954681
Subject: re: drones

CrazyNeutrino said:


poikilotherm said:

Peak Warming Man said:

I looked into them for sitting on my arse and checking on cattle nad

Can’t you find something weird like that with google?

yeah use Google street view

yeah, fo all those marked streets of your property…

smh

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:43:50
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 954682
Subject: re: drones

that what Google should do next

satellite view of streets from space

with a live video feed

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:45:19
From: AwesomeO
ID: 954684
Subject: re: drones

With more rain predicted the farmers might be a bit over it and closely watching their bumper crops

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:47:37
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 954687
Subject: re: drones

AwesomeO said:


With more rain predicted the farmers might be a bit over it and closely watching their bumper crops

this week of rain and a hot burst next week, the farmers will be rolling in it.
canola here has exploded over the last 2 weeks

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 17:49:07
From: AwesomeO
ID: 954689
Subject: re: drones

stumpy_seahorse said:


AwesomeO said:

With more rain predicted the farmers might be a bit over it and closely watching their bumper crops

this week of rain and a hot burst next week, the farmers will be rolling in it.
canola here has exploded over the last 2 weeks

Yeah, I drive to Maryborough and all the paddocks are yellow as far as you can see and it is pretty flat around here.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 18:00:18
From: poikilotherm
ID: 954693
Subject: re: drones

AwesomeO said:


stumpy_seahorse said:

AwesomeO said:

With more rain predicted the farmers might be a bit over it and closely watching their bumper crops

this week of rain and a hot burst next week, the farmers will be rolling in it.
canola here has exploded over the last 2 weeks

Yeah, I drive to Maryborough and all the paddocks are yellow as far as you can see and it is pretty flat around here.

Everyone having a bumper crop at the same time is bad news for commodity prices usually…

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 18:02:11
From: AwesomeO
ID: 954696
Subject: re: drones

poikilotherm said:


AwesomeO said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

this week of rain and a hot burst next week, the farmers will be rolling in it.
canola here has exploded over the last 2 weeks

Yeah, I drive to Maryborough and all the paddocks are yellow as far as you can see and it is pretty flat around here.

Everyone having a bumper crop at the same time is bad news for commodity prices usually…

It is, you just have to hope it’s not bumper crops internationally, and some can be stored albeit a cost involved with that. And many of the crops are being traded before they are even planted, it’s a complicated business.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 18:17:11
From: sibeen
ID: 954701
Subject: re: drones

poikilotherm said:


AwesomeO said:

stumpy_seahorse said:

this week of rain and a hot burst next week, the farmers will be rolling in it.
canola here has exploded over the last 2 weeks

Yeah, I drive to Maryborough and all the paddocks are yellow as far as you can see and it is pretty flat around here.

Everyone having a bumper crop at the same time is bad news for commodity prices usually…

We can use drones to start fires in the USA, Ukraine and Russia.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 20:47:51
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 954813
Subject: re: drones

Dropbear said:


pesce.del.giorno said:

They seem like a ridiculously simple, obvious and untraceable means of delivering a remotely detonated explosive device.

The payload is small but I guess if it’s C4 then it can be.. I imagine at significant VIP events, the wireless frequencies are jammed

It doesn’t matter if they jam the various radio frequencies that RC gear uses, it’s still not particularly difficult to program an autopilot to do the entire flight without having to touch the controls. No pilot input needed.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 20:50:32
From: dv
ID: 954816
Subject: re: drones

Dual Robot Arm Large-Format Drone PD6B-AW-ARM

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 20:58:47
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 954820
Subject: re: drones

dv said:


Dual Robot Arm Large-Format Drone PD6B-AW-ARM

Nice.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 21:02:25
From: party_pants
ID: 954821
Subject: re: drones

dv said:


Dual Robot Arm Large-Format Drone PD6B-AW-ARM

Looks promising.

Love to see one snatch Trump’s hair-piece off his scone.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 21:07:54
From: Bubblecar
ID: 954822
Subject: re: drones

party_pants said:


dv said:

Dual Robot Arm Large-Format Drone PD6B-AW-ARM

Looks promising.

Love to see one snatch Trump’s hair-piece off his scone.

And take a snap of the big empty hole underneath.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 21:08:57
From: dv
ID: 954823
Subject: re: drones

Ah, Trumplestiltskin, spinning gold into hair

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 21:09:04
From: party_pants
ID: 954824
Subject: re: drones

Still, if you want payload, I imagine you’d get much more from a co-axial rotor machine of a similar size. Surely they can be fitted with similar auto-pilot and GPS type electronics. I don’t see that the 4 or 6 arm drone is the optimal layout.

Is there a limit to the size of any one rotor you may have on a drone?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 21:14:25
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 954828
Subject: re: drones

party_pants said:


Still, if you want payload, I imagine you’d get much more from a co-axial rotor machine of a similar size. Surely they can be fitted with similar auto-pilot and GPS type electronics. I don’t see that the 4 or 6 arm drone is the optimal layout.

Is there a limit to the size of any one rotor you may have on a drone?

You mean a helicopter.
Yes they can lift a fair bit (~30 kg for a grunty one, but not for long) If you wanted something that could lift a reasonable payload and go fast, just use a fairly conventional RC aeroplane. There’s First Person View gear you can get that’ll give you a ~ 50 km range. Just fly it visually anywhere you like out to about that far.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 21:25:00
From: dv
ID: 954834
Subject: re: drones

I need a ruling. Can a copter not be a drone, technically?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 21:26:38
From: roughbarked
ID: 954836
Subject: re: drones

dv said:


I need a ruling. Can a copter not be a drone, technically?

If it can be remotely controlled… That makes it a drone?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/09/2016 21:26:38
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 954837
Subject: re: drones

dv said:


I need a ruling. Can a copter not be a drone, technically?

Sure.

Reply Quote