Date: 30/10/2016 14:43:42
From: sibeen
ID: 974393
Subject: WaterSeer - we're saved.

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/waterseer-water-women#/

A really, really, really good idea.

To bad it won’t work.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 14:55:01
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 974395
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

sibeen said:


https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/waterseer-water-women#/

A really, really, really good idea.

To bad it won’t work.

It might work better in reverse. Extracting water from wet ground.
Oh wait, that’s a well.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 16:56:51
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 974411
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

sibeen said:


https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/waterseer-water-women#/

A really, really, really good idea.

To bad it won’t work.

Rather than me explain why it can’t work., I’ll lust lay out the framework, as a teacher might. You, pretending to be student, will find it easy to fill in the gaps.

The temperature doesn’t decrease with depth unless ……. in which case …….. or unless …….. in which case ……..

Even if the relative humidity is so high that condensation can occur underground, by simply waiting a few hours you can get very much more condensation on the surface because ……..

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 17:04:05
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 974412
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

They did give villagers in the Andes something that had a wire mesh and a trough below it.
It hardly ever rains in those places but they get heavy mists that roll in from the sea every day.
I think those water collectors work ok.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 17:12:00
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 974414
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

For a system that does work successfully in mountainous terrain for extracting water from humid air, look up “artificial glacier”. Moisture from the air condeness directly out on the surface of the artificial glacier. The artificial glacier has to be carefully tended, so it’s a fairly labour-intensive operation, but it does work.

Better still, collect rain.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 17:42:33
From: sibeen
ID: 974419
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

Enthalpy of vaporisation works both ways. It takes approximately 2 MJ of energy to turn 1 kg of water into steam, it therefore also takes the same amount of energy to do the reverse. The video rabbits on about getting nearly 40 litres of water a day. So 80 MJ of energy per day gets injected into the ground. I suspect the ground may heat up a tad.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 17:53:06
From: buffy
ID: 974421
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

Aargh..we were going to walk down to Chinatown for tea. But it is raining. I think we might just stay in house and eat this time.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 17:58:39
From: buffy
ID: 974422
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

Whoops..sorry

Although strangely apposite.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 18:05:38
From: AwesomeO
ID: 974424
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

sibeen said:


Enthalpy of vaporisation works both ways. It takes approximately 2 MJ of energy to turn 1 kg of water into steam, it therefore also takes the same amount of energy to do the reverse. The video rabbits on about getting nearly 40 litres of water a day. So 80 MJ of energy per day gets injected into the ground. I suspect the ground may heat up a tad.

Are you sure? Steam is because you are putting energy in and moving the molecules. Stop putting energy in and it condenses, you don’t need to put any energy in to convert it back to water. Or that’s my understanding.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 18:13:04
From: sibeen
ID: 974425
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

AwesomeO said:


sibeen said:

Enthalpy of vaporisation works both ways. It takes approximately 2 MJ of energy to turn 1 kg of water into steam, it therefore also takes the same amount of energy to do the reverse. The video rabbits on about getting nearly 40 litres of water a day. So 80 MJ of energy per day gets injected into the ground. I suspect the ground may heat up a tad.

Are you sure? Steam is because you are putting energy in and moving the molecules. Stop putting energy in and it condenses, you don’t need to put any energy in to convert it back to water. Or that’s my understanding.

Stop putting energy in and it condenses…so where does the energy that was put in to turn it into steam go?

Yep, it works both ways.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 18:14:37
From: AwesomeO
ID: 974426
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

sibeen said:


AwesomeO said:

sibeen said:

Enthalpy of vaporisation works both ways. It takes approximately 2 MJ of energy to turn 1 kg of water into steam, it therefore also takes the same amount of energy to do the reverse. The video rabbits on about getting nearly 40 litres of water a day. So 80 MJ of energy per day gets injected into the ground. I suspect the ground may heat up a tad.

Are you sure? Steam is because you are putting energy in and moving the molecules. Stop putting energy in and it condenses, you don’t need to put any energy in to convert it back to water. Or that’s my understanding.

Stop putting energy in and it condenses…so where does the energy that was put in to turn it into steam go?

Yep, it works both ways.

Into moving the molecules and keeping them moving. No more energy, no more movement.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 18:21:13
From: sibeen
ID: 974427
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

AwesomeO said:


sibeen said:

AwesomeO said:

Are you sure? Steam is because you are putting energy in and moving the molecules. Stop putting energy in and it condenses, you don’t need to put any energy in to convert it back to water. Or that’s my understanding.

Stop putting energy in and it condenses…so where does the energy that was put in to turn it into steam go?

Yep, it works both ways.

Into moving the molecules and keeping them moving. No more energy, no more movement.

Conservation of energy. The energy put into a system will come back out. It just cannot disappear.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 18:23:44
From: AwesomeO
ID: 974428
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

sibeen said:


AwesomeO said:

sibeen said:

Stop putting energy in and it condenses…so where does the energy that was put in to turn it into steam go?

Yep, it works both ways.

Into moving the molecules and keeping them moving. No more energy, no more movement.

Conservation of energy. The energy put into a system will come back out. It just cannot disappear.

Yeah, that sounds familiar as well.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 18:25:13
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 974429
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

sibeen said:


AwesomeO said:

sibeen said:

Stop putting energy in and it condenses…so where does the energy that was put in to turn it into steam go?

Yep, it works both ways.

Into moving the molecules and keeping them moving. No more energy, no more movement.

Conservation of energy. The energy put into a system will come back out. It just cannot disappear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfZ12UGiisM

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 18:26:18
From: AwesomeO
ID: 974430
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

Yeah thought about it a bit more. Those big cooling towers the energy goes into raising the temperature of the river or lake, cup of coffee into warming the mug etc.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 18:29:07
From: sibeen
ID: 974431
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

The Rev Dodgson said:


sibeen said:

AwesomeO said:

Into moving the molecules and keeping them moving. No more energy, no more movement.

Conservation of energy. The energy put into a system will come back out. It just cannot disappear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfZ12UGiisM

ROFL.

I should bookmark that. It will become useful with a job I’m working on at the moment.

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 18:32:02
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 974432
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

And while we’re you-tubing, have a Second Law of Thermodynamics, with a First Law thrown in for good measure:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnbiVw_1FNs

Reply Quote

Date: 30/10/2016 18:37:49
From: sibeen
ID: 974433
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

The Rev Dodgson said:


And while we’re you-tubing, have a Second Law of Thermodynamics, with a First Law thrown in for good measure:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VnbiVw_1FNs

Conduction, convection and radiation. They really should tech this song in Uni :)

Reply Quote

Date: 31/10/2016 14:39:05
From: dv
ID: 974679
Subject: re: WaterSeer - we're saved.

It is not clear to me what the advantage is to burying the reservoir.

Reply Quote