To keep all the comments in one place for those who are interested and for those who aren’t.
To keep all the comments in one place for those who are interested and for those who aren’t.
I’m going out on a limb and calling it for Clinton.
You heard it here first .. should cut down on a lot lot needless speculation.
HTH
“There is a deep-rooted misogyny in this country that is virulent and pretty horrifying.”
I, as a cis-gendered white man, hadn’t really been aware of it. But you see people not being comfortable just flat-out stating their misogyny, but instead stating something like they can’t vote for Hillary “because of her voice” or “the way she dresses.” And I’m like, “You know what? That’s just straight-up misogyny.” It’s like how there were so many people who were vehemently opposed to Obama and it was just insidious racism.
The argument for her, and I hope this is self-evident, is that she’s smart, principled, experienced and tough, with a solid, progressive voting record. I get very frustrated when people say that she’s not a progressive. Have you actually looked at her legislative record? It’s almost identical to Bernie Sanders’ legislative record.
With Trump, you get a belligerent racist who’s most likely a sociopath definitely a racist and misogynist with no governing experience. And with Hillary, you get an incredibly bright, progressive, strong, experienced legislator. There’s no choice unless you’re ignorant, delusional or racist.
I’ve given more money to Democrats this cycle than I’ve ever given in an election season. I’ve done phone-banking, tweeted, Facebooked and Instagrammed, probably to my own personal detriment — the detriment of my friendships certainly the detriment of my professional life – but honestly, the results of this election are more important than most. I’d rather lose fans and have a hand in trying to keep Donald Trump out of the White House than trying to protect a career. A career pales in comparison to the health and wellbeing of our country and our planet.
What I learned a long time ago is if you’re a public figure and you’re opinionated and outspoken, people will hate you for it — even if they agree with what you’re saying. But it’s really nice: I’ve been doing this for a long time and at this point I just don’t care. What’s someone gonna do — not buy my records? It’s 2016, no one buys records anyway.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/moby-donald-trump-is-actual-sociopath-w448443
sarahs mum said:
“There is a deep-rooted misogyny in this country that is virulent and pretty horrifying.”
I, as a cis-gendered white man, hadn’t really been aware of it. But you see people not being comfortable just flat-out stating their misogyny, but instead stating something like they can’t vote for Hillary “because of her voice” or “the way she dresses.” And I’m like, “You know what? That’s just straight-up misogyny.” It’s like how there were so many people who were vehemently opposed to Obama and it was just insidious racism.
The argument for her, and I hope this is self-evident, is that she’s smart, principled, experienced and tough, with a solid, progressive voting record. I get very frustrated when people say that she’s not a progressive. Have you actually looked at her legislative record? It’s almost identical to Bernie Sanders’ legislative record.
With Trump, you get a belligerent racist who’s most likely a sociopath definitely a racist and misogynist with no governing experience. And with Hillary, you get an incredibly bright, progressive, strong, experienced legislator. There’s no choice unless you’re ignorant, delusional or racist.
I’ve given more money to Democrats this cycle than I’ve ever given in an election season. I’ve done phone-banking, tweeted, Facebooked and Instagrammed, probably to my own personal detriment — the detriment of my friendships certainly the detriment of my professional life – but honestly, the results of this election are more important than most. I’d rather lose fans and have a hand in trying to keep Donald Trump out of the White House than trying to protect a career. A career pales in comparison to the health and wellbeing of our country and our planet.
What I learned a long time ago is if you’re a public figure and you’re opinionated and outspoken, people will hate you for it — even if they agree with what you’re saying. But it’s really nice: I’ve been doing this for a long time and at this point I just don’t care. What’s someone gonna do — not buy my records? It’s 2016, no one buys records anyway.http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/moby-donald-trump-is-actual-sociopath-w448443
Well said, Moby. Well said.
I am still stunned beyond stunned when I read peoples’ comments about why Trump is better than Clinton.
I’ve already made up my mind – if Mr PTSD actually does vote for him he won’t be welcome in this house. I’ve already stepped back from anything to do with him as his obvious misogyny was starting to piss me off.
kii said:
sarahs mum said:
“There is a deep-rooted misogyny in this country that is virulent and pretty horrifying.”
I, as a cis-gendered white man, hadn’t really been aware of it. But you see people not being comfortable just flat-out stating their misogyny, but instead stating something like they can’t vote for Hillary “because of her voice” or “the way she dresses.” And I’m like, “You know what? That’s just straight-up misogyny.” It’s like how there were so many people who were vehemently opposed to Obama and it was just insidious racism.
The argument for her, and I hope this is self-evident, is that she’s smart, principled, experienced and tough, with a solid, progressive voting record. I get very frustrated when people say that she’s not a progressive. Have you actually looked at her legislative record? It’s almost identical to Bernie Sanders’ legislative record.
With Trump, you get a belligerent racist who’s most likely a sociopath definitely a racist and misogynist with no governing experience. And with Hillary, you get an incredibly bright, progressive, strong, experienced legislator. There’s no choice unless you’re ignorant, delusional or racist.
I’ve given more money to Democrats this cycle than I’ve ever given in an election season. I’ve done phone-banking, tweeted, Facebooked and Instagrammed, probably to my own personal detriment — the detriment of my friendships certainly the detriment of my professional life – but honestly, the results of this election are more important than most. I’d rather lose fans and have a hand in trying to keep Donald Trump out of the White House than trying to protect a career. A career pales in comparison to the health and wellbeing of our country and our planet.
What I learned a long time ago is if you’re a public figure and you’re opinionated and outspoken, people will hate you for it — even if they agree with what you’re saying. But it’s really nice: I’ve been doing this for a long time and at this point I just don’t care. What’s someone gonna do — not buy my records? It’s 2016, no one buys records anyway.http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/moby-donald-trump-is-actual-sociopath-w448443
Well said, Moby. Well said.
I am still stunned beyond stunned when I read peoples’ comments about why Trump is better than Clinton.
I’ve already made up my mind – if Mr PTSD actually does vote for him he won’t be welcome in this house. I’ve already stepped back from anything to do with him as his obvious misogyny was starting to piss me off.
It’s total madness, I don’t even want to think about it.
The idea that there are human beings who think Trump would be a sane choice for president is just too depressing. It seems so much of the social progress I thought I was seeing in my lifetime has completely missed a huge slab of the US population, and presumably other Western nations as well.
Bubblecar said:
kii said:
sarahs mum said:
“There is a deep-rooted misogyny in this country that is virulent and pretty horrifying.”
I, as a cis-gendered white man, hadn’t really been aware of it. But you see people not being comfortable just flat-out stating their misogyny, but instead stating something like they can’t vote for Hillary “because of her voice” or “the way she dresses.” And I’m like, “You know what? That’s just straight-up misogyny.” It’s like how there were so many people who were vehemently opposed to Obama and it was just insidious racism.
The argument for her, and I hope this is self-evident, is that she’s smart, principled, experienced and tough, with a solid, progressive voting record. I get very frustrated when people say that she’s not a progressive. Have you actually looked at her legislative record? It’s almost identical to Bernie Sanders’ legislative record.
With Trump, you get a belligerent racist who’s most likely a sociopath definitely a racist and misogynist with no governing experience. And with Hillary, you get an incredibly bright, progressive, strong, experienced legislator. There’s no choice unless you’re ignorant, delusional or racist.
I’ve given more money to Democrats this cycle than I’ve ever given in an election season. I’ve done phone-banking, tweeted, Facebooked and Instagrammed, probably to my own personal detriment — the detriment of my friendships certainly the detriment of my professional life – but honestly, the results of this election are more important than most. I’d rather lose fans and have a hand in trying to keep Donald Trump out of the White House than trying to protect a career. A career pales in comparison to the health and wellbeing of our country and our planet.
What I learned a long time ago is if you’re a public figure and you’re opinionated and outspoken, people will hate you for it — even if they agree with what you’re saying. But it’s really nice: I’ve been doing this for a long time and at this point I just don’t care. What’s someone gonna do — not buy my records? It’s 2016, no one buys records anyway.http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/moby-donald-trump-is-actual-sociopath-w448443
Well said, Moby. Well said.
I am still stunned beyond stunned when I read peoples’ comments about why Trump is better than Clinton.
I’ve already made up my mind – if Mr PTSD actually does vote for him he won’t be welcome in this house. I’ve already stepped back from anything to do with him as his obvious misogyny was starting to piss me off.
It’s total madness, I don’t even want to think about it.
The idea that there are human beings who think Trump would be a sane choice for president is just too depressing. It seems so much of the social progress I thought I was seeing in my lifetime has completely missed a huge slab of the US population, and presumably other Western nations as well.
Exactly! It’s one of the things that contributes to my mental health fragility. Seriously. I meet people and they look normal – funny, interested in similar things to me etc and then they reveal themselves to be completely fucked in the head via a simple comment. It’s not just been since this Trump debacle, it’s been since I arrived here nearly 10 years ago. One minute they seem completely normal and then something is said about some social issue etc and I have to re-evaluate my perception of them. A lot of it is to do with religious wankery.
Bubblecar said:
The idea that there are human beings who think Trump would be a sane choice for president is just too depressing. It seems so much of the social progress I thought I was seeing in my lifetime has completely missed a huge slab of the US population, and presumably other Western nations as well.
If all that voting for the mainstream choices has done is send you backwards they are probably thinkng fuck it, let’s break the joint and see what happens. How much worse for me can it be?
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/world/growing-fake-news-phenomenon-fuels-polarized-u-s-election
I thought we were running more than 38% crap info in facebook shares.
What is cis-gendered?
There do seem to be two Americas. There’s actually quite a lot of stuff around like the Moby piece, Quora is full of it:
https://www.quora.com/
Or maybe they just feed me the stuff they think I’ll like.
Anyway, let’s hope the sensible majority win the day.
OK, I’ve looked up cisgender.
sarahs mum said:
“There is a deep-rooted misogyny in this country that is virulent and pretty horrifying.”
I, as a cis-gendered white man, hadn’t really been aware of it. But you see people not being comfortable just flat-out stating their misogyny, but instead stating something like they can’t vote for Hillary “because of her voice” or “the way she dresses.” And I’m like, “You know what? That’s just straight-up misogyny.” It’s like how there were so many people who were vehemently opposed to Obama and it was just insidious racism.
The argument for her, and I hope this is self-evident, is that she’s smart, principled, experienced and tough, with a solid, progressive voting record. I get very frustrated when people say that she’s not a progressive. Have you actually looked at her legislative record? It’s almost identical to Bernie Sanders’ legislative record.
With Trump, you get a belligerent racist who’s most likely a sociopath definitely a racist and misogynist with no governing experience. And with Hillary, you get an incredibly bright, progressive, strong, experienced legislator. There’s no choice unless you’re ignorant, delusional or racist.
I’ve given more money to Democrats this cycle than I’ve ever given in an election season. I’ve done phone-banking, tweeted, Facebooked and Instagrammed, probably to my own personal detriment — the detriment of my friendships certainly the detriment of my professional life – but honestly, the results of this election are more important than most. I’d rather lose fans and have a hand in trying to keep Donald Trump out of the White House than trying to protect a career. A career pales in comparison to the health and wellbeing of our country and our planet.
What I learned a long time ago is if you’re a public figure and you’re opinionated and outspoken, people will hate you for it — even if they agree with what you’re saying. But it’s really nice: I’ve been doing this for a long time and at this point I just don’t care. What’s someone gonna do — not buy my records? It’s 2016, no one buys records anyway.http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/moby-donald-trump-is-actual-sociopath-w448443
that is soooo true… no one buys records any more…
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil%27s_Advocate_(1997_film)
wookiemeister said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.htmlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil%27s_Advocate_(1997_film)
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
MOSTLY FALSE
wookiemeister said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.htmlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil%27s_Advocate_(1997_film)
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
MOSTLY FALSE
dv said:
wookiemeister said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.htmlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil%27s_Advocate_(1997_film)
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
MOSTLY FALSE
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-transit-strike-in-philly-could-lower-turnout-among-black-and-poor-voters/
A Transit Strike In Philly Could Lower Turnout, Especially Among Black And Poor Voters
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-transit-strike-in-philly-could-lower-turnout-among-black-and-poor-voters/
A Transit Strike In Philly Could Lower Turnout, Especially Among Black And Poor Voters
Black might matter but poor voters are likely to believe trump.
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-transit-strike-in-philly-could-lower-turnout-among-black-and-poor-voters/
A Transit Strike In Philly Could Lower Turnout, Especially Among Black And Poor Voters
So Hilary would only win the state by 40%?
sibeen said:
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-transit-strike-in-philly-could-lower-turnout-among-black-and-poor-voters/
A Transit Strike In Philly Could Lower Turnout, Especially Among Black And Poor Voters
So Hilary would only win the state by 40%?
Err, I may have meant 4%.
sibeen said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-transit-strike-in-philly-could-lower-turnout-among-black-and-poor-voters/
A Transit Strike In Philly Could Lower Turnout, Especially Among Black And Poor Voters
So Hilary would only win the state by 40%?
Err, I may have meant 4%.
roughbarked said:
dv said:
wookiemeister said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.htmlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil%27s_Advocate_(1997_film)
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
MOSTLY FALSE
Tell me about the bits thta weren’t FALSE.
Probably simplest for you to read the article but basically: it is true that she was appointed to represent the rapist. She asked to be removed from the case but the request was denied. She never asserted that the victim made the story up. She is recorded as laughing about the fact that the rapist’s polygraph test destroyed her faith in polygraphs forever.
roughbarked said:
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-transit-strike-in-philly-could-lower-turnout-among-black-and-poor-voters/
A Transit Strike In Philly Could Lower Turnout, Especially Among Black And Poor Voters
Black might matter but poor voters are likely to believe trump.
Trump voters are relatively wealthy on average.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-mythology-of-trumps-working-class-support/
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
MOSTLY FALSE
Tell me about the bits thta weren’t FALSE.Probably simplest for you to read the article but basically: it is true that she was appointed to represent the rapist. She asked to be removed from the case but the request was denied. She never asserted that the victim made the story up. She is recorded as laughing about the fact that the rapist’s polygraph test destroyed her faith in polygraphs forever.
She isn’t squeaky but at least compared to Trump she’s almost normal.
sibeen said:
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-transit-strike-in-philly-could-lower-turnout-among-black-and-poor-voters/
A Transit Strike In Philly Could Lower Turnout, Especially Among Black And Poor Voters
So Hilary would only win the state by 40%?
Right now she is 3.5% ahead in Philadelphia.
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-transit-strike-in-philly-could-lower-turnout-among-black-and-poor-voters/
A Transit Strike In Philly Could Lower Turnout, Especially Among Black And Poor Voters
Black might matter but poor voters are likely to believe trump.
Trump voters are relatively wealthy on average.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-mythology-of-trumps-working-class-support/
There is another deriviative on poor.
dv said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-transit-strike-in-philly-could-lower-turnout-among-black-and-poor-voters/
A Transit Strike In Philly Could Lower Turnout, Especially Among Black And Poor Voters
So Hilary would only win the state by 40%?
Right now she is 3.5% ahead in Philadelphia.
Ahead in Philly is everything, for Philly.
dv said:
wookiemeister said:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3729466/Child-rape-victim-comes-forward-time-40-years-call-Hillary-Clinton-liar-defended-rapist-smearing-blocking-evidence-callously-laughing-knew-guilty.htmlhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Devil%27s_Advocate_(1997_film)
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-freed-child-rapist-laughed-about-it/
MOSTLY FALSE
i wouldnt trust hillary , now would any sane person
hillary had her time to make the world a better place and just ended up filling up her bank account
assange quite rightly has tapped her as untrustworthy
But yeah … that’s about what they’ve got on HDRC. She was appointed, forty years ago, to defend a rapist, and also used a private mail server. This is worse than Watergate.
dv said:
But yeah … that’s about what they’ve got on HDRC. She was appointed, forty years ago, to defend a rapist, and also used a private mail server. This is worse than Watergate.
OK, so how long did tricky Dickie do that for?
i guess hillary can have a poke at the russian bear and get mauled when she gets in
i’m seeing a first strike by russia on american silos and its strike capability
i don’t see them glassing australia unless they get mouthy and start doing stupid things at the behest of the yanks that have dragged this country into every doomed conflict since malaya.
if russia hits america and leaves all the other NATO members alone i don’t see britain pressing the button
wookiemeister said:
i guess hillary can have a poke at the russian bear and get mauled when she gets ini’m seeing a first strike by russia on american silos and its strike capability
i don’t see them glassing australia unless they get mouthy and start doing stupid things at the behest of the yanks that have dragged this country into every doomed conflict since malaya.
if russia hits america and leaves all the other NATO members alone i don’t see britain pressing the button
You actually believe there is nobody left who remembers the past?
dv said:
But yeah … that’s about what they’ve got on HDRC. She was appointed, forty years ago, to defend a rapist, and also used a private mail server. This is worse than Watergate.
—
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9v97xH6Bof0
Seth Meyers sums it up at 6:20…
russia is going to drive every jihadist and religious nutcase straight into the guts of europe. that takes care of the western front as thousands of little gremlins start the knife attacks and bombs. its a good payback for europe that has aided and abetted the whole process in the middle east for the last20 years.
wookiemeister said:
i’m seeing a first strike by russia on american silos and its strike capability
Do you know how stupid you sound when you make these crazy predictions? Anyway aren’t Turkey and Russia supposed to be at war by now?
Witty Rejoinder said:
wookiemeister said:i’m seeing a first strike by russia on american silos and its strike capability
Do you know how stupid you sound when you make these crazy predictions? Anyway aren’t Turkey and Russia supposed to be at war by now?
I could see a cold war-ish thing happening again.
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
wookiemeister said:i’m seeing a first strike by russia on american silos and its strike capability
Do you know how stupid you sound when you make these crazy predictions? Anyway aren’t Turkey and Russia supposed to be at war by now?
I could see a cold war-ish thing happening again.
Methinks an internal civil war would precede any other conflict.
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
wookiemeister said:i’m seeing a first strike by russia on american silos and its strike capability
Do you know how stupid you sound when you make these crazy predictions? Anyway aren’t Turkey and Russia supposed to be at war by now?
I could see a cold war-ish thing happening again.
Yep, if Clinton wins who could know what would happen. She is known to be a bit of a hawk on these matters.
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Do you know how stupid you sound when you make these crazy predictions? Anyway aren’t Turkey and Russia supposed to be at war by now?
I could see a cold war-ish thing happening again.
Yep, if Clinton wins who could know what would happen. She is known to be a bit of a hawk on these matters.
The hawk moth still needs to evade the hunting squirrel.
Witty Rejoinder said:
wookiemeister said:i’m seeing a first strike by russia on american silos and its strike capability
Do you know how stupid you sound when you make these crazy predictions? Anyway aren’t Turkey and Russia supposed to be at war by now?
theyve signed an agreement on gas transit through turkey
wookiemeister said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
wookiemeister said:i’m seeing a first strike by russia on american silos and its strike capability
Do you know how stupid you sound when you make these crazy predictions? Anyway aren’t Turkey and Russia supposed to be at war by now?
its on hold – for nowtheyve signed an agreement on gas transit through turkey
Carrier in flames…
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
wookiemeister said:i’m seeing a first strike by russia on american silos and its strike capability
Do you know how stupid you sound when you make these crazy predictions? Anyway aren’t Turkey and Russia supposed to be at war by now?
I could see a cold war-ish thing happening again.
Well let’s face it, it is already on
http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/world/malcolm-gladwell-us-election-the-national-trump-clinton-1.3838449
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Do you know how stupid you sound when you make these crazy predictions? Anyway aren’t Turkey and Russia supposed to be at war by now?
I could see a cold war-ish thing happening again.
Yep, if Clinton wins who could know what would happen. She is known to be a bit of a hawk on these matters.
Clinton might be in the same position as Obama where Congress is held by Republican majority so everything he wanted to put through was blocked.
If Trump becomes president I wonder if he and Putin will ride the same horse topless together
Cymek said:
If Trump becomes president I wonder if he and Putin will ride the same horse topless together
That would be perfectly natural. But not if Hillary became president.
Cymek said:
If Trump becomes president I wonder if he and Putin will ride the same horse topless together
Sure, but he’s making Putin pay for it.
Divine Angel said:
Cymek said:
If Trump becomes president I wonder if he and Putin will ride the same horse topless together
Sure, but he’s making Putin pay for it.
I’m sure Putin will be happy to provide Trump with as many horses as he wants.
If he wins.
party_pants said:
Cymek said:
If Trump becomes president I wonder if he and Putin will ride the same horse topless together
That would be perfectly natural. But not if Hillary became president.
I was in Byron on the weekend.. seems that topless activities aren’t all the uncommon woman or even bottomless activities for men…
I knew there’s a reason moved to Rainbow Beach.
;)
“By some estimates more Hispanics had voted in Florida by the weekend than voted in the entire 2012 election.”
Wonder who they voted for.
I posted this earlier but hey, I find it amusing. It’s from one of the many election stories currently on the abc news site.
Divine Angel said:
“Like in Australia, the losing candidate will usually call the winner to concede defeat once that number has been reached.”…Unless Clinton wins.
“The ‘Donald J. Trump Victory Party’ will start at 6.30pm at the New York Hilton Midtown.”
Credit for being optimistic.
Divine Angel said:
I posted this earlier but hey, I find it amusing. It’s from one of the many election stories currently on the abc news site.Divine Angel said:
“Like in Australia, the losing candidate will usually call the winner to concede defeat once that number has been reached.”…Unless Clinton wins.
“The ‘Donald J. Trump Victory Party’ will start at 6.30pm at the New York Hilton Midtown.”
Credit for being optimistic.
I remember Ross Perot’s speech after he badly lost the election.
“They said we couldn’t do it!” he triumphantly declared. Even the gathered supporters had WTF? in their thought balloons.
I’m rooting for the old boiler.
In his 1987 book, The Art of the Deal, Donald Trump recalled punching his second-grade music teacher in the face: “Because I didn’t think he knew anything about music.”
The alleged recipient of the punch, who taught Trump at the private Kew-Forest school in Queens, New York, would later insist it never happened.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/07/donald-trump-jamaica-estates-new-york-election-day?CMP=fb_gu
sarahs mum said:
In his 1987 book, The Art of the Deal, Donald Trump recalled punching his second-grade music teacher in the face: “Because I didn’t think he knew anything about music.”The alleged recipient of the punch, who taught Trump at the private Kew-Forest school in Queens, New York, would later insist it never happened.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/07/donald-trump-jamaica-estates-new-york-election-day?CMP=fb_gu
That book is a face-out title in the business section at work…I often have to walk past it :/
kii said:
sarahs mum said:
In his 1987 book, The Art of the Deal, Donald Trump recalled punching his second-grade music teacher in the face: “Because I didn’t think he knew anything about music.”The alleged recipient of the punch, who taught Trump at the private Kew-Forest school in Queens, New York, would later insist it never happened.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/07/donald-trump-jamaica-estates-new-york-election-day?CMP=fb_gu
That book is a face-out title in the business section at work…I often have to walk past it :/
:(
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Donald wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some margin
http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Donald wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some marginhttp://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
I will be certainly surprised if NH comes out for Donald.
My facebook is full of it.
Question. Does ‘truth, justice and the American way’ predate Superman?
sarahs mum said:
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Donald wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some marginhttp://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
I will be certainly surprised if NH comes out for Donald.
My facebook is full of it.
Question. Does ‘truth, justice and the American way’ predate Superman?
The speeches’ of the greet Republican President Abraham Lincoln woud suggest it goes back a long way.
Facebook is usually full of it.
sarahs mum said:
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Donald wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some marginhttp://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
I will be certainly surprised if NH comes out for Donald.
My facebook is full of it.
Question. Does ‘truth, justice and the American way’ predate Superman?
The above is such a propaganda line
Cymek said:
sarahs mum said:
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Donald wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some marginhttp://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
I will be certainly surprised if NH comes out for Donald.
My facebook is full of it.
Question. Does ‘truth, justice and the American way’ predate Superman?
The above is such a propaganda line
Tamb said:
Cymek said:
sarahs mum said:I will be certainly surprised if NH comes out for Donald.
My facebook is full of it.
Question. Does ‘truth, justice and the American way’ predate Superman?
The above is such a propaganda line
It’s not a lie. You get truth & justice or you get the American way.
If I had super powers the last thing I would want to do would be loyal to one nation, you’d have a responsibility to look after the entire population of the planet.
Cymek said:
Tamb said:
Cymek said:The above is such a propaganda line
It’s not a lie. You get truth & justice or you get the American way.If I had super powers the last thing I would want to do would be loyal to one nation
Funnily enough, that’s the same conclusion that all but three of the previous incarnation of one nation’s sitting members came to to…
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Donald wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some marginhttp://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
Stop calling this idiot – “The Donald”.
kii said:
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Trump wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some marginhttp://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
Stop calling this idiot – “The Donald”.
fixed
kii said:
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Man wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some marginhttp://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
Stop calling this idiot – “The Donald”.
?
kii said:
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Dude wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some marginhttp://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
Stop calling this idiot – “The Donald”.
I like this one…
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Dude wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some marginhttp://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
Stop calling this idiot – “The Donald”.
I like this one…

arvs
Storms on the way. And 36.. a bit too warm for wandering around the paddock
diddly-squat said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:Stop calling this idiot – “The Donald”.
I like this one…
Donald?
Ian said:
diddly-squat said:
diddly-squat said:I like this one…
Donald?
Dude…
kii said:
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first results to come through tomorrow will be New Hampshire.
I’m surprised it’s even close but if Hillary wins that one the other contentious states will follow
If The Donald wins it it could well come down to Florida, again.
Personally I don’t believe the polls and think Hilary is a shoe in by some marginhttp://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37450661
Stop calling this idiot – “The Donald”.
FWIW “Donald” in Cockney rhyming slang means “in a very bad way”
I’ve always had a pretty low opinion of Amerrickans collectively, but I think that the turn out for Trump will make a useful FITHometer for that peculiar mob.
Ian said:
I’ve always had a pretty low opinion of Amerrickans collectively, but I think that the turn out for Trump will make a useful FITHometer for that peculiar mob.
They’re very similar to Australians, there’s just more of them.
poikilotherm said:
Ian said:
I’ve always had a pretty low opinion of Amerrickans collectively, but I think that the turn out for Trump will make a useful FITHometer for that peculiar mob.
They’re very similar to Australians, there’s just more of them.
Not IME
Ian said:
poikilotherm said:
Ian said:
I’ve always had a pretty low opinion of Amerrickans collectively, but I think that the turn out for Trump will make a useful FITHometer for that peculiar mob.
They’re very similar to Australians, there’s just more of them.
Not IME
Americans living elsewhere seem to be more intelligent and critical of USA culture I’ve noticed
If I was US citizen, I would leave too. And not just because of this election…
furious said:
- Americans living elsewhere seem to be more intelligent
If I was US citizen, I would leave too. And not just because of this election…
I can see it becoming a police state all in the name of fighting terrorists
Cymek said:
Ian said:
poikilotherm said:They’re very similar to Australians, there’s just more of them.
Not IME
Americans living elsewhere seem to be more intelligent and critical of USA culture I’ve noticed
I think there are a great many Americans living in America that are intelligent and critical of US socio-political factors…
But I agree with poik… I think by-and-large we (Australians) like to demonise the US for being in the position it is now but then we have a parliament that not only talks about similar policies to what Trump is proposing, but is actually enacting them.
Cymek said:
furious said:
- Americans living elsewhere seem to be more intelligent
If I was US citizen, I would leave too. And not just because of this election…
I can see it becoming a police state all in the name of fighting terrorists
yeah… probably considering all mannerisms of meta-data collection and retention, citizenship and immigration restrictions…
diddly-squat said:
Cymek said:
furious said:
- Americans living elsewhere seem to be more intelligent
If I was US citizen, I would leave too. And not just because of this election…
I can see it becoming a police state all in the name of fighting terrorists
yeah… probably considering all mannerisms of meta-data collection and retention, citizenship and immigration restrictions…
And the militarisation of the police force who are getting surplus vehicles and weapons
diddly-squat said:
Cymek said:
Ian said:Not IME
Americans living elsewhere seem to be more intelligent and critical of USA culture I’ve noticed
I think there are a great many Americans living in America that are intelligent and critical of US socio-political factors…
But I agree with poik… I think by-and-large we (Australians) like to demonise the US for being in the position it is now but then we have a parliament that not only talks about similar policies to what Trump is proposing, but is actually enacting them.
Yes I think so allowing small minded people to dictate policy and actions all on mostly misguided fears
Cymek said:
diddly-squat said:
Cymek said:I can see it becoming a police state all in the name of fighting terrorists
yeah… probably considering all mannerisms of meta-data collection and retention, citizenship and immigration restrictions…
And the militarisation of the police force who are getting surplus vehicles and weapons
I was being facetious, the American constitution protects personal freedoms much more than happens here in Oz… we have far more draconian laws around things like collection and retention of meta data or laws governing citizenship and immigration…
Ok America… don’t fuck it up.
diddly-squat said:
Cymek said:
diddly-squat said:yeah… probably considering all mannerisms of meta-data collection and retention, citizenship and immigration restrictions…
And the militarisation of the police force who are getting surplus vehicles and weapons
I was being facetious, the American constitution protects personal freedoms much more than happens here in Oz… we have far more draconian laws around things like collection and retention of meta data or laws governing citizenship and immigration…
The Patriot Act explicitly violated the U.S. constitution, but was enacted without intervention from the courts. There was opposition to it from citizenry, but they were ignored.
Arts said:
Ok America… don’t fuck it up.
yeah. what she said.
But I agree with poik… I think by-and-large we (Australians) like to demonise the US for being in the position it is now but then we have a parliament that not only talks about similar policies to what Trump is proposing, but is actually enacting them.
——-
Mmm, similar direction but even close to the same degree. None of the major parties here have presented a Trump as leader… Howard (to whom nearly everything rotten can be traced) and Abbott come closest.
Cross a Palmer with a Roberts and you’d be getting close.
Ian said:
But I agree with poik… I think by-and-large we (Australians) like to demonise the US for being in the position it is now but then we have a parliament that not only talks about similar policies to what Trump is proposing, but is actually enacting them.——-
Mmm, similar direction but even close to the same degree. None of the major parties here have presented a Trump as leader… Howard (to whom nearly everything rotten can be traced) and Abbott come closest.
Cross a Palmer with a Roberts and you’d be getting close.
I don’t think that someone in Australia with no political experience or past interest in that arena and whose only qualifications are a shit load of money would get that far…
Ian said:
But I agree with poik… I think by-and-large we (Australians) like to demonise the US for being in the position it is now but then we have a parliament that not only talks about similar policies to what Trump is proposing, but is actually enacting them.——-
Mmm, similar direction but even close to the same degree. None of the major parties here have presented a Trump as leader… Howard (to whom nearly everything rotten can be traced) and Abbott come closest.
Cross a Palmer with a Roberts and you’d be getting close.
I’m talking policies, not personalities
Ian said:
But I agree with poik… I think by-and-large we (Australians) like to demonise the US for being in the position it is now but then we have a parliament that not only talks about similar policies to what Trump is proposing, but is actually enacting them.——-
Mmm, similar direction but even close to the same degree. None of the major parties here have presented a Trump as leader… Howard (to whom nearly everything rotten can be traced) and Abbott come closest.
Cross a Palmer with a Roberts and you’d be getting close.
Remind me, which party was it that legislated mandatory detention, that people who arrived by boat would never ever be resettled and locked up women and children in what is described by activists as concentration camps? Because from the rhetoric routinely rolled out here, you might be mistaken and think it was the Liberals.
AwesomeO said:
Ian said:
But I agree with poik… I think by-and-large we (Australians) like to demonise the US for being in the position it is now but then we have a parliament that not only talks about similar policies to what Trump is proposing, but is actually enacting them.——-
Mmm, similar direction but even close to the same degree. None of the major parties here have presented a Trump as leader… Howard (to whom nearly everything rotten can be traced) and Abbott come closest.
Cross a Palmer with a Roberts and you’d be getting close.
Remind me, which party was it that legislated mandatory detention, that people who arrived by boat would never ever be resettled and locked up women and children in what is described by activists as concentration camps? Because from the rhetoric routinely rolled out here, you might be mistaken and think it was the Liberals.
Well, to be fair about it, the Liberals did vote for that legislation…..
;)
diddly-squat said:
Ian said:
But I agree with poik… I think by-and-large we (Australians) like to demonise the US for being in the position it is now but then we have a parliament that not only talks about similar policies to what Trump is proposing, but is actually enacting them.——-
Mmm, similar direction but even close to the same degree. None of the major parties here have presented a Trump as leader… Howard (to whom nearly everything rotten can be traced) and Abbott come closest.
Cross a Palmer with a Roberts and you’d be getting close.
I’m talking policies, not personalities
I’m talking both.
There are three states that are as close as buggery in the polls. Nevada, North Carolina and Florida. Together they add up 50 Electoral college votes so basically a shift of a fraction of a percent could take Clinton from 322-216 to 272-266. If the latter happens then Trump will just need any of Clinton’s so-called firewall states: New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Colorado.
But present polling indicates those states should be okay.
dv said:
There are three states that are as close as buggery in the polls. Nevada, North Carolina and Florida. Together they add up 50 Electoral college votes so basically a shift of a fraction of a percent could take Clinton from 322-216 to 272-266. If the latter happens then Trump will just need any of Clinton’s so-called firewall states: New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Colorado.But present polling indicates those states should be okay.
Let’s hope so.
Forget Hawaii..
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/10/21/opinion/why-hawaii-doesnt-vote/
diddly-squat said:
Cymek said:
diddly-squat said:yeah… probably considering all mannerisms of meta-data collection and retention, citizenship and immigration restrictions…
And the militarisation of the police force who are getting surplus vehicles and weapons
I was being facetious, the American constitution protects personal freedoms much more than happens here in Oz… we have far more draconian laws around things like collection and retention of meta data or laws governing citizenship and immigration…
Looking forward to world war wookiemeister after the election
Reporter: so Mr Trump, it appears that you lost to Mrs Clinton for the presidency, do you have any comment on that?
Donald Trump: I never ran for president.
Is it over year?
Woodie said:
Is it over year?
You probably got another 20 hours before a winner is declared
What outlet will you be watching the count on DV, Fox?
Man it’s a weird system, you can vote early and the go back and change your vote and Republicans who don’t like Trump are swapping their votes between states to keep him out, all kosher apparently.
“Thousands of disenchanted Americans are taking part in what is known as vote trading, where voters legally swap their votes with others in different states, as part of a tactical effort to keep Donald Trump out of the White House.”
Peak Warming Man said:
Man it’s a weird system, you can vote early and the go back and change your vote and Republicans who don’t like Trump are swapping their votes between states to keep him out, all kosher apparently.“Thousands of disenchanted Americans are taking part in what is known as vote trading, where voters legally swap their votes with others in different states, as part of a tactical effort to keep Donald Trump out of the White House.”
they’re a weird mob.
I hope Hillary wins, but I’ve decided not to vote in this election.
Peak Warming Man said:
Man it’s a weird system, you can vote early and the go back and change your vote and Republicans who don’t like Trump are swapping their votes between states to keep him out, all kosher apparently.“Thousands of disenchanted Americans are taking part in what is known as vote trading, where voters legally swap their votes with others in different states, as part of a tactical effort to keep Donald Trump out of the White House.”
I’ll wait for the wookie report before reaching any conclusions on this.
How do the people who trade votes know what the other person really does?
Here’s the mathematical reason why it’s impossible for Donald Trump to win the US election
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/us-election-will-trump-clinton-win-electoral-college-swing-states-a7402351.html?cmpid=facebook-post
The Rev Dodgson said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Man it’s a weird system, you can vote early and the go back and change your vote and Republicans who don’t like Trump are swapping their votes between states to keep him out, all kosher apparently.“Thousands of disenchanted Americans are taking part in what is known as vote trading, where voters legally swap their votes with others in different states, as part of a tactical effort to keep Donald Trump out of the White House.”
I’ll wait for the wookie report before reaching any conclusions on this.
How do the people who trade votes know what the other person really does?
yeah I think that idea is a bit silly
Bubblecar said:
Here’s the mathematical reason why it’s impossible for Donald Trump to win the US electionhttp://www.independent.co.uk/voices/us-election-will-trump-clinton-win-electoral-college-swing-states-a7402351.html?cmpid=facebook-post
It’s really noy impossible.
But it is not likely.
Bubblecar said:
I hope Hillary wins, but I’ve decided not to vote in this election.
Out of interest, when was the last time you voted in an election?
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
Here’s the mathematical reason why it’s impossible for Donald Trump to win the US electionhttp://www.independent.co.uk/voices/us-election-will-trump-clinton-win-electoral-college-swing-states-a7402351.html?cmpid=facebook-post
It’s really noy impossible.
But it is not likely.
The article explains that it’s unlikely, but it seems a click-hungry sub-editor decided “impossible” was more alluring.
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
I hope Hillary wins, but I’ve decided not to vote in this election.
Out of interest, when was the last time you voted in an election?
Would have been in high school when voting for class captain.
When O’Bama leaves office I wonder if he’ll pardon Bwian.
Bubblecar said:
Would have been in high school when voting for class captain.
Were you on the ballot?
Sadly, the dream of Egg McMuFinn winning in Utah is fading, but he will probably get about 30% of the vote.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Bubblecar said:Would have been in high school when voting for class captain.
Were you on the ballot?
Yes, I think most of the class were. Can’t remember who won, or what their duties entailed, if anything. The class captain thing was discontinued in my subsequent high school years (that was my first year).
are we there yet?
The boffins at fivethirtyeight.com have lowered the boom. Their final estimate of percentage probabilities shows a sharp up-tick in the last couple of days for Clinton, following the FBI’s announcement that the new email trove contains nothing that necessitates the probe into Clinton’s email server to be reopened.

Note that the last polls that influence this model were conducted over four days at least, and hence are contaminated by responses recorded before the FBI made this announcement. An optimistic soul might reason that things are actually more positive for Clinton than these polls suggest.
party_pants said:
are we there yet?
Not until around midday tomorrow.
party_pants said:
are we there yet?
You should have a winner by about 3 pm Sydney time
…or a bit later than midday :)
Bubblecar said:
…or a bit later than midday :)
3pm Sydney time is midday Perth time :)
I’ll call it after the first exit polls hit the wires and go to bed.
Peak Warming Man said:
I’ll call it after the first exit polls hit the wires and go to bed.
After a three year election campaign we can’t afford to rush these final hours.

dv said:
https://s16.postimg.org/oyb09r7px/pollsonly.jpg
well that’s just loverly
Are we there yet?
The shortest newspaper editorial of the 2016 presidential campaign, from the Miami Herald:

Bubblecar said:
The shortest newspaper editorial of the 2016 presidential campaign, from the Miami Herald:
Rupert looks quite mild by comparison.
Trump and wife booed as they arrive to vote.
kii said:
Trump and wife booed as they arrive to vote.
I’m surprised at the number of people on my feed that want to move to canada if hillary wins..

Stumpy_seahorse said:
kii said:
Trump and wife booed as they arrive to vote.
I’m surprised at the number of people on my feed that want to move to canada if hillary wins..
They have no idea what’s just over the border.

kii said:
snigger
!https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/14993377_10101144563497425_4252600874670459567_n.jpg?oh=c934e07c8893c7b9a307fad01acd4871&oe=58CB2F4F
Stumpy_seahorse said:
kii said:
Trump and wife booed as they arrive to vote.
I’m surprised at the number of people on my feed that want to move to canada if hillary wins..
Sounds like you need some dietary adjustment.
Ian said:
Stumpy_seahorse said:
kii said:
Trump and wife booed as they arrive to vote.
I’m surprised at the number of people on my feed that want to move to canada if hillary wins..
Sounds like you need some dietary adjustment.
I have three people on my feed voting Trump. Two of them are from Ohio.. one from California. All are hard working whites fighting poverty. The two in Ohio live in an area where the primary employers are arms manufacturers and take away food. They rally for their football team even through player rape allegations. Even though they are god fearing Christians. And.. they aren’t smart people.
My favourite african american grandma is voting for Stein.
I really hope that Clinton wins by a landslide. Trump will demand recount upon recount if it’s a narrow margin.
Divine Angel said:
I really hope that Clinton wins by a landslide. Trump will demand recount upon recount if it’s a narrow margin.
He can have as many recounts as he likes. If Clinton gets the required number of EC votes.
In the election where bush got in there was widespread vote rigging , people not being able to vote etc . Al gore is shown brushing all these inconsistencies aside and thus ushering in the war in the Middle East.
Russia has been busily deploying its troops and nuclear missile systems and I rather suspect they have already been doing their own polls and intelligence collecting and already know who is going to win – hence the build up and deployment of nuclear warheads.
Oh course this is all al foil hat territory to suggest that the super powers take an active interest in how the course of an election would flow, it would all be a complete surprise.
wookiemeister said:
In the election where bush got in there was widespread vote rigging , people not being able to vote etc . Al gore is shown brushing all these inconsistencies aside and thus ushering in the war in the Middle East.Russia has been busily deploying its troops and nuclear missile systems and I rather suspect they have already been doing their own polls and intelligence collecting and already know who is going to win – hence the build up and deployment of nuclear warheads.
Britain has also been deploying.
sarahs mum said:
wookiemeister said:
In the election where bush got in there was widespread vote rigging , people not being able to vote etc . Al gore is shown brushing all these inconsistencies aside and thus ushering in the war in the Middle East.Russia has been busily deploying its troops and nuclear missile systems and I rather suspect they have already been doing their own polls and intelligence collecting and already know who is going to win – hence the build up and deployment of nuclear warheads.
Britain has also been deploying.
Anyway, it’s Russia positioning its troops , it’s expecting a bellicose American government and is moving its chess pieces to warn off Hillary
wookiemeister said:
sarahs mum said:
wookiemeister said:
In the election where bush got in there was widespread vote rigging , people not being able to vote etc . Al gore is shown brushing all these inconsistencies aside and thus ushering in the war in the Middle East.Russia has been busily deploying its troops and nuclear missile systems and I rather suspect they have already been doing their own polls and intelligence collecting and already know who is going to win – hence the build up and deployment of nuclear warheads.
Britain has also been deploying.
Airstrip 1 just does what it’s told. Militarily Britain is still in the EU and is thus still bound to send its troops to fight Russia. I doubt if Brexit will happen any time soon.Anyway, it’s Russia positioning its troops , it’s expecting a bellicose American government and is moving its chess pieces to warn off Hillary
So the cold war continues?
Vote 1 Wookie for POTUS
I think they already know Hillary will win this hence the military manoeuvres
I’ve just read three articles about psychic animals predicting the outcome of the US election. The male animals all chose Trump while the female animals went for Hillary.
Make of that what ye will.
Unless the yanks can stop the flow of crime and drugs from Mexico its doomed. They regularly find tunnels built to ship drugs into America , pseudo submarines have been built to facilitate drugs into America. More drugs – more crime , combined with guns you have set the stage for a massive civil war
wookiemeister said:
Unless the yanks can stop the flow of crime and drugs from Mexico its doomed. They regularly find tunnels built to ship drugs into America , pseudo submarines have been built to facilitate drugs into America. More drugs – more crime , combined with guns you have set the stage for a massive civil war
The easy fix is to remove the drug smuggler’s market. Make the drugs legal.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2016/11/daily-chart-4?fsrc=scn/fb/te/bl/ed/howothercountrieswouldvoteintheamericanelection
Oh Trump!
“It’s been a beautiful process … the people of this country are incredible,” Mr Trump said of the election.
“ if I don’t win, I will consider it a tremendous waste of time, energy and money.”
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-09/at-long-last-americans-choose-between-clinton-and-trump/8007474
roughbarked said:
wookiemeister said:
Unless the yanks can stop the flow of crime and drugs from Mexico its doomed. They regularly find tunnels built to ship drugs into America , pseudo submarines have been built to facilitate drugs into America. More drugs – more crime , combined with guns you have set the stage for a massive civil war
The easy fix is to remove the drug smuggler’s market. Make the drugs legal.
make soft drugs legal and wipe out the hard drugs cartels Phillipines style . This way the top part of the pyramid can be eradicated without the legal system being involved which would only stall the ability of society to get clean . More crime – more work for the legal system , it’s a business after all
wookiemeister said:
roughbarked said:
wookiemeister said:
Unless the yanks can stop the flow of crime and drugs from Mexico its doomed. They regularly find tunnels built to ship drugs into America , pseudo submarines have been built to facilitate drugs into America. More drugs – more crime , combined with guns you have set the stage for a massive civil war
The easy fix is to remove the drug smuggler’s market. Make the drugs legal.
Maybemake soft drugs legal and wipe out the hard drugs cartels Phillipines style . This way the top part of the pyramid can be eradicated without the legal system being involved which would only stall the ability of society to get clean . More crime – more work for the legal system , it’s a business after all
Divine Angel said:
Vote 1 Wookie for POTUS
Not another two years of yank electioneering.
And I’m never voting wookie unless there is a biggest scaremonger competition.
Tamb said:
wookiemeister said:
roughbarked said:The easy fix is to remove the drug smuggler’s market. Make the drugs legal.
Maybemake soft drugs legal and wipe out the hard drugs cartels Phillipines style . This way the top part of the pyramid can be eradicated without the legal system being involved which would only stall the ability of society to get clean . More crime – more work for the legal system , it’s a business after all
I think legalisation is the only long term answer. Synthetic drugs are so easy to make that law enforcement cannot keep up.
But the war on drugs has been so effective…
Tamb said:
wookiemeister said:
roughbarked said:The easy fix is to remove the drug smuggler’s market. Make the drugs legal.
Maybemake soft drugs legal and wipe out the hard drugs cartels Phillipines style . This way the top part of the pyramid can be eradicated without the legal system being involved which would only stall the ability of society to get clean . More crime – more work for the legal system , it’s a business after all
I think legalisation is the only long term answer. Synthetic drugs are so easy to make that law enforcement cannot keep up.
Speed radar and various taxes on otherwise law abiding people makes money, chasing serial offenders doesn’t
People that end up killing people with their vehicles rarely serve any real sentence even though they are serial offenders.
Realistically it’s easier for the gov to do nothing and tell people they are
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:
wookiemeister said:Maybe
make soft drugs legal and wipe out the hard drugs cartels Phillipines style . This way the top part of the pyramid can be eradicated without the legal system being involved which would only stall the ability of society to get clean . More crime – more work for the legal system , it’s a business after all
I think legalisation is the only long term answer. Synthetic drugs are so easy to make that law enforcement cannot keep up.But the war on drugs has been so effective…
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:
wookiemeister said:Maybe
make soft drugs legal and wipe out the hard drugs cartels Phillipines style . This way the top part of the pyramid can be eradicated without the legal system being involved which would only stall the ability of society to get clean . More crime – more work for the legal system , it’s a business after all
I think legalisation is the only long term answer. Synthetic drugs are so easy to make that law enforcement cannot keep up.But the war on drugs has been so effective…
Well the war on speeding, the war on robbery and the war on murder haven’t stopped these activities but that doesn’t mean we should legalise them.
Peak Warming Man said:
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:I think legalisation is the only long term answer. Synthetic drugs are so easy to make that law enforcement cannot keep up.
But the war on drugs has been so effective…
Well the war on speeding, the war on robbery and the war on murder haven’t stopped these activities but that doesn’t mean we should legalise them.
Nice strawman for the morning.
poikilotherm said:
Peak Warming Man said:
poikilotherm said:But the war on drugs has been so effective…
Well the war on speeding, the war on robbery and the war on murder haven’t stopped these activities but that doesn’t mean we should legalise them.
Nice strawman for the morning.
i was thinking false equivalence. again. sure keep the war on the big suppliers but for the average bruce and shirl it is a health issue.
poikilotherm said:
Peak Warming Man said:
poikilotherm said:But the war on drugs has been so effective…
Well the war on speeding, the war on robbery and the war on murder haven’t stopped these activities but that doesn’t mean we should legalise them.
Nice strawman for the morning.
wookiemeister said:
poikilotherm said:
Peak Warming Man said:Well the war on speeding, the war on robbery and the war on murder haven’t stopped these activities but that doesn’t mean we should legalise them.
Nice strawman for the morning.
I like my strawmen like my coffee – black
BEN CASSELMAN 5:31 PM
Here’s another interesting tidbit from the exit polls: Voters overall consider the economy the top issue facing the next president. But Clinton voters are significantly more focused on the economy than Trump voters, who are more concerned with terrorism and immigration. That runs counter to the narrative, which we’ve previously questioned, that Trump supporters are motivated primarily by economic anxiety.
—-
Preliminary exit polls suggest that 17 percent of voters are excited by the idea of Clinton as president and 29 percent are scared of it; only 13 percent of voters are excited about Trump as president, while 37 percent said that idea scared them.
I thought Trump supporters were motivated by guns, wiping out other nations and grabbing women inappropriately.
Divine Angel said:
I thought Trump supporters were motivated by guns, wiping out other nations and grabbing women inappropriately.
And this https://youtu.be/dhVtgojbmKU
HARRY ENTEN 5:28 PM
If all voters who approve of President Obama vote for Clinton, it’s going to be a good night for her. The preliminary exit poll puts Obama’s approval rating at 54 percent. That’s far higher than George W. Bush’s was in 2008, when just 27 percent approved of the job he was doing. He definitely hurt John McCain’s chances of winning.
BEN CASSELMAN 5:13 PM
Trump’s campaign didn’t feature much in the way of specific policy proposals (no, “We’re going to make a great trade deal” doesn’t count). But one area where Trump has offered specifics is tax policy. The only problem: Those specifics kept changing, sometimes in dramatic ways. Alan Cole, an expert at the conservative Tax Foundation, had an entertaining tweetstorm today on the winding path of Trump’s tax plans. The bottom line, though, remained the same throughout: Trump’s plan would cut taxes on the richest Americans while reducing government revenue by trillions of dollars.
I wonder if Hillary will let Bill anywhere near the oval office desk?
Preliminary exit polls suggest that 17 percent of voters are excited by the idea of Clinton as president and 29 percent are scared of it; only 13 percent of voters are excited about Trump as president, while 37 percent said that idea scared them.
————
http://www.smh.com.au/photogallery/federal-politics/cartoons/cartoons-by-michael-leunig-20090711-dgl6
Peak Warming Man said:
I wonder if Hillary will let Bill anywhere near the oval office desk?
As president she can probably have like 100 secret service guys on him 24/7
Would Bill still have SS protection?
Divine Angel said:
Would Bill still have SS protection?
From his time as Pres, I mean.
Divine Angel said:
Would Bill still have SS protection?
Oh yeah he does, good point
There could be a shoot out
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
I wonder if Hillary will let Bill anywhere near the oval office desk?
As president she can probably have like 100 secret service guys on him 24/7
She’s gunna deed twice that number if she wants to survive one term imo.
Divine Angel said:
Divine Angel said:
Would Bill still have SS protection?
From his time as Pres, I mean.
The biggest story is that this is the first presidential election since a Supreme Court decision removed important protections of the Voting Rights Act, leading to hundreds of poll closures around the country. The full impact of those changes probably won’t be clear until all the votes are counted. It probably exacerbated long lines, already a big problem in 2012. At least the weather isn’t likely to dissuade people from voting. Long lines and polling-place closures have a much bigger effect on vote totals than voter fraud.
Do US polling places have sausage sizzles and/or cake stalls?
CARL BIALIK 2:31 PM
Why is it illegal to post ballot selfies like Eric Trump did today on Twitter (before deleting it)? One big argument for banning the practice is that it could be used as a way for the selfie taker to prove that she or he voted for a certain candidate — whether to satisfy a coercive employer’s demand, to earn a bribe for the vote or to convert on a vote swap. Opponents of the bans say there’s no evidence any of that really happens.
—-
Dumb ass
Was anyone expecting Eric Trump to vote for Hillary?
dv said:
The biggest story is that this is the first presidential election since a Supreme Court decision removed important protections of the Voting Rights Act, leading to hundreds of poll closures around the country. The full impact of those changes probably won’t be clear until all the votes are counted. It probably exacerbated long lines, already a big problem in 2012. At least the weather isn’t likely to dissuade people from voting. Long lines and polling-place closures have a much bigger effect on vote totals than voter fraud.
Divine Angel said:
Was anyone expecting Eric Trump to vote for Hillary?
I was expecting him to trip over his own feet and then choke on a dandelion
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
Was anyone expecting Eric Trump to vote for Hillary?
I was expecting him to trip over his own feet and then choke on a dandelion
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
Was anyone expecting Eric Trump to vote for Hillary?
I was expecting him to trip over his own feet and then choke on a dandelion
As long as he got a selfie.
Divine Angel said:
Was anyone expecting Eric Trump to vote for Hillary?
No not Eric the Red.
The Rev Dodgson said:
What is cis-gendered?There do seem to be two Americas. There’s actually quite a lot of stuff around like the Moby piece, Quora is full of it:
https://www.quora.com/Or maybe they just feed me the stuff they think I’ll like.
Anyway, let’s hope the sensible majority win the day.
You know, it’s funny… In the bad seed, of ideology or nature thread, your last reply to me where you stated you had seen no evidence of the type of things I was speaking about I had typed out a counter reply but ultimately decided to leave it alone and didn’t submit. That counter reply “Do you know what cis means? Do you know what zi means? Zie? Xe?”
dv said:
Divine Angel said:
Was anyone expecting Eric Trump to vote for Hillary?
I was expecting him to trip over his own feet and then choke on a dandelion
Hahahaha…….*snort *
“… It seems so much of the social progress I thought I was seeing in my lifetime has completely missed a huge slab of the US population, and presumably other Western nations as well.”
By “ social progress”, do you mean “moral homogeneity”, as in “Anyone that doesn’t share every one of MY moral values is a backwards neanderthal”? Because, you know, huge chunks of Western nations populations are missing out on genuine social progress – and in the US that is why they are voting for Trump, because they know full well Clinton and her ilk are never going to throw any of the bones of this progress their way.
Capitalism thrives on competition. In every competition there are winners and losers. The question with capitalism is “How badly should the losers lose?” Currently the losers are losing badly enough that they, or those who can see themselves slowly heading in to that territory, are willing to vote for a fool like Trump.
Yesterday a woman came up to the store manager and one of the leads while they were moving a table. She said: Trump loves books and ALL booksellers! The guys just stood there and smiled until she walked away. They’re both gay.
Trump loves booksellers because they hold the power to have all his books on show in prominent places, such as the front window and by the rubbish bins.
George W Bush and his wife, Laura, “voted ‘None of the Above’ for president”, spokesman Freddy Ford said in an email.
Here’s what’s going to happen if Clinton should win.
A no fly zone will be imposed over parts of Syria which will result in NATO shooting down a Russian warplane.
There will be lots of sabre rattling and you and I are going to start worrying about Russia exercising its nuclear option either in direct retaliation or by supplying nuclear arms to their allies in the Middle East. Four years from now at the next US election negotiations between Russia and the US will be at a “delicate stage”, such that Clinton will hardly need to campaign for re-election; she will simply need to remind people that Russia has nukes and that if the American people don’t want to jeopardize the safety of the world then changing US governments at such a delicate time is out of the question.
Meanwhile, nuclear arms will proliferate in the Middle East. There will be a short cold war followed by a horrifying hot war.
This will be Hillary Clinton’s legacy. She is a dangerous person.
In contrast, Trump will co-operate with Putin regarding the Syrian situation. We will probably still end up with nuclear war in the Middle East, but at least we will not have a concomitant war with Russia to worry about.
Trump is an idiot, Clinton is a war-monger.
Choose wisely, America!
Hillary will win and most likely prove to be a reasonably competent president.
Reports of casualties, gunman on the loose after shooting outside California polling station
According to ABC news, Trump has 19 safe seats, Hillary has 3.
Divine Angel said:
Reports of casualties, gunman on the loose after shooting outside California polling station
It was bound to happen.
Divine Angel said:
Reports of casualties, gunman on the loose after shooting outside California polling station
URL?
And the results are rolling.
kii said:
Divine Angel said:
Reports of casualties, gunman on the loose after shooting outside California polling station
URL?
Peak Warming Man said:
And the results are rolling.
abc showing Hills 3 safes trumpet 19 safes.
Divine Angel said:
kii said:
Divine Angel said:
Reports of casualties, gunman on the loose after shooting outside California polling station
URL?
It’s a rolling headline on ABC news, but no story as yet.
I got off the bed and hit the main computer. Too tricky to search and panic on the tablet.
Bubblecar said:
Hillary will win and most likely prove to be a reasonably competent president.
can we say the same about Trump if he wins?
Divine Angel said:
:(
Reports of casualties, gunman on the loose after shooting outside California polling station
Arts said:
Bubblecar said:
Hillary will win and most likely prove to be a reasonably competent president.
can we say the same about Trump if he wins?
Um, no.
Arts said:
can we say the same about Trump if he wins?
It will be like watching a corpse rot in the midday sun.
are we there yet?
Do you reckon Trump is a lizard person but a severely brain damaged one
Cymek said:
Do you reckon Trump is a lizard person but a severely brain damaged one
probably.
party_pants said:
are we there yet?
The TV is saying 19 Trumps v 3 Hillaries,and we need 270 of them apparently, so no.
poikilotherm said:
party_pants said:
are we there yet?
The TV is saying 19 Trumps v 3 Hillaries,and we need 270 of them apparently, so no.
24 to 3
poikilotherm said:
party_pants said:
are we there yet?
The TV is saying 19 Trumps v 3 Hillaries,and we need 270 of them apparently, so no.
wish they’d get on with it
party_pants said:
are we there yet?
Grab some popcorn, we’re in for a bumpy ride.
Divine Angel said:
party_pants said:
are we there yet?
Grab some popcorn, we’re in for a bumpy ride.
But I don’t want popcorn to spill all over the place.
Anthony Green’s gone early and virtually called it for Clinton.
What does Antony Green do when there’s no election happening?
182 – 92 for Hillary now.
44 Clinton, 31 Trump
So Trump never ended up releasing his tax returns. I wonder if that will be a precedent for future elections.
Divine Angel said:
What does Antony Green do when there’s no election happening?
Tutorials on how to use touch-screen graphics.
Divine Angel said:
What does Antony Green do when there’s no election happening?
He masturbates over truck loads of data print outs.
Peak Warming Man said:
Anthony Green’s gone early and virtually called it for Clinton.
He’ll have noticed my call from 2.5 days ago no doubt.
party_pants said:
Divine Angel said:
What does Antony Green do when there’s no election happening?
He masturbates over truck loads of data print outs.
That escalated quickly.
Witty Rejoinder said:
party_pants said:
Divine Angel said:
What does Antony Green do when there’s no election happening?
He masturbates over truck loads of data print outs.
That escalated quickly.
You can’t handle the truth.
I’m sorry I asked.
Divine Angel said:
I’m sorry I asked.
Antony John Green (born 2 March 1960) is an Australian psephologist and commentator. He is the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s election analyst.
Contents
1 Early years and background
2 Career
3 References
4 External links
Early years and background
Born in Warrington, Cheshire in northern England, Green emigrated to Australia with his family in 1964. He attended James Ruse Agricultural High School in Sydney, graduating in 1977. Green graduated with a Bachelor of Science in mathematics and computing, and a Bachelor of Economics with honours in politics from the University of Sydney. He worked initially as a data analyst in the computing industry and for a polling company before joining the ABC in 1989.
Career
Green first appeared on the ABC’s election-night television coverage in the 1991 NSW general election, following with the federal election in 1993.
As of 2016 he had analysed over 60 Australian territory, state and federal elections for the ABC, starting with the 1989 Queensland state election to the 2016 federal election. He designed the computer system that he uses to predict election results based on partial counts.
As the ABC’s Election Analyst, Green is responsible for the content of its election website. He also has editorial responsibility for its data analysis and for their election night results service. He is considered “the face of election night coverage”.
In time for the 2013 federal election campaign, Green helped introduce the voter engagement tool Vote Compass to the ABC website. It enables voters to gauge how their views align with candidates based on party’s statements on issues and also provides Green and other analysts a dataset larger than traditional opinion polls. Green also writes a comprehensive blog on electoral matters.
Green has said that he tends not to do campaign commentary and that he “prefers to go into an election night with no preconceived view on the outcome and to just concentrate on understanding the data as it comes in.”
In a 2015 interview he explained that some of the work in preparation for his election night coverage can start years earlier including building up the database with candidates, polling places and past results and calculating the impact of redistributions. He also recounted the move from doing the coverage from tally rooms to the studio after his “nightmare” of the power outage during the on air coverage in 2010.
In addition to analysing and commenting on elections for the ABC, Green writes election analysis for third-party media outlets such as The Sydney Morning Herald and Crikey and has appeared before the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters of the Australian Parliament urging reform of the ticket voting system used in Australian Senate elections.
In 2014 the University of Sydney recognised Green with an Honorary Doctor of Letters. This was followed in 2015 by appointment as an Adjunct Professor in Sydney University’s Department of Government and International Relations recognising Green’s work in the study of elections.
Green’s contribution to political analysis was celebrated in the song “Antony Green” in the musical Keating!, where he was represented as an animated character.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_Green
But does he know where the good sausage sizzles are?
>> Green emigrated to Australia with his family in 1964. He attended James Ruse Agricultural High School in Sydney, graduating in 1977.
He would have been in the same year with some of my over achieving classmates from primary school.
Divine Angel said:
I’m sorry I asked.
Sorry, I have plenty on at work to distract me for the rest of the morning.
sarahs mum said:
>> Green emigrated to Australia with his family in 1964. He attended James Ruse Agricultural High School in Sydney, graduating in 1977.He would have been in the same year with some of my over achieving classmates from primary school.
I understand that JRAHS is an excellent school but is there any snob factor about eastern suburbs folk attending a HS in western Sydney?
ABC just announces that the turn-out in Pennsylvania could top 80%. The average turnout for recent US federal elections has been around 55%.
party_pants said:
Divine Angel said:
I’m sorry I asked.
Sorry, I have plenty on at work to distract me for the rest of the morning.
Not me. Boss decided to do the interviews herself. Suits me just fine :)
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:
>> Green emigrated to Australia with his family in 1964. He attended James Ruse Agricultural High School in Sydney, graduating in 1977.He would have been in the same year with some of my over achieving classmates from primary school.
I understand that JRAHS is an excellent school but is there any snob factor about eastern suburbs folk attending a HS in western Sydney?
If it were up to me I wouldn’t have gone to a selective school. I was faulty and needed to become a lady. AFAIK James Ruse is still the high school for maths nerds.
According to the ABC, one dead and two critically injured in the Azusa shooting in California. Local police say the shooter (apparently female) targeted local habitations, not the polling place. The suspect has not been apprehended.
Texas is leaning blue…

I wonder where DV is. I thought he’d be all over this thread today.
Witty Rejoinder said:
I wonder where DV is. I thought he’d be all over this thread today.
He’s probably in some specialised US election forum.
Witty Rejoinder said:
I wonder where DV is. I thought he’d be all over this thread today.
perhaps he is working?
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
I wonder where DV is. I thought he’d be all over this thread today.
perhaps he is working?
He works from home and usually lurks I think.
I can confirm that The Lizard People, under instruction by Trump, have kidnapped DV.
He’s probably napping.
Divine Angel said:
I can confirm that The Lizard People, under instruction by Trump, have kidnapped DV.
I think they prefer to be called Reptilians.
kii said:
He’s probably napping.
kid napped. he’s napping with his kids?
kii said:
He’s probably napping.
Or outside chasing DV Junior away from bins.
perhaps he’s seeing the specialist about his arm
It sure does drag on this US election, makes our Federal election look very low key.
The US needs 6 month elections, a year is too long
Each Party needs to run two other candidates longer until the last week
No mud throwing after that, all policies need to be tabled
one of my facebookers in Ohio says that Foxtv says Trump is ahead by lots. They are cheering it on like football match.
sarahs mum said:
one of my facebookers in Ohio says that Foxtv says Trump is ahead by lots. They are cheering it on like football match.
staying out of that..
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
I wonder where DV is. I thought he’d be all over this thread today.
perhaps he is working?
He works from home and usually lurks I think.
He’s following Martin Bush on facebook.
sarahs mum said:
He’s following Martin Bush on facebook.
Okay.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:He’s following Martin Bush on facebook.
Okay.
Who is Martin Bush?
ABC
3 mins ·
Donald Trump is leading Hillary Clinton by 32 Electoral College votes, according to media reports, with the Republicans also expected to retain control of the US House of Representatives.
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:He’s following Martin Bush on facebook.
Okay.
Who is Martin Bush?
I’m guessing Martin B
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
sarahs mum said:He’s following Martin Bush on facebook.
Okay.
Who is Martin Bush?
Good Martin.
Trump is ahead in Michigan. This is unexpected. Looks like it will be a nail-biter.
Peak Warming Man said:
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Okay.
Who is Martin Bush?
I’m guessing Martin B
Ahhh.
Witty Rejoinder said:
kii said:
He’s probably napping.
Or outside chasing DV Junior away from bins.
We call him the Little Ibis
But fuck …
If HDRC does not win Virginia then she has a somewhat narrow path to victory. It will also represent a massive polling failure. The polls indicated she was going to win Virginia by 6%. No one was even talking about it being at risk.
Trump FTW eh
dv said:
But fuck …If HDRC does not win Virginia then she has a somewhat narrow path to victory. It will also represent a massive polling failure. The polls indicated she was going to win Virginia by 6%. No one was even talking about it being at risk.
I think the whole election is a failure, they need to start again.
they are saying 15% of voters turned out for the first time.
such a large number of new voters it would be difficult for the pollsters to call it correctly.
CrazyNeutrino said:
I think the whole election is a failure, they need to start again.
Why is the election a failure? Just because the candidate you support losers isn’t the correct answer.
It’s going to come down to Florida, again.
starts digging more tank traps
Well I’m not going to let it spoil my day, whatever happens. If Hillary wins, all well & good, if Trump sneaks in, it’ll just mean a media blackout in this household for the next five years.
Peak Warming Man said:
It’s going to come down to Florida, again.starts digging more tank traps
s’ok, we’ve sold out to the Chinamen anyway…
Check yourself before you wreck yourself..

Dropbear said:
Check yourself before you wreck yourself..
Having two eyes that look like genitals would wreak anyone.
Dropbear said:
Check yourself before you wreck yourself..
The rise of The Empire can be blamed on him
Aaargh :(
I live amongst these fuckheads!!!!
Cymek said:
Dropbear said:
Check yourself before you wreck yourself..!https://usatcollege.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/cheerfulhugedutchsmoushond.gif?w=1000
The rise of The Empire can be blamed on him
Senator Binks for President!
Jesus… Michigan too close to call. Been 28 years since Michigan went Republican. If Trump wins there it is over. That is a massive chunk of votes.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2016-election-results-coverage/
538 saying there is a 55% chance that Trump wins.
Fuck me.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:
Dropbear said:
Check yourself before you wreck yourself..!https://usatcollege.files.wordpress.com/2015/11/cheerfulhugedutchsmoushond.gif?w=1000
The rise of The Empire can be blamed on him
Senator Binks for President!
This is literally happening ..
sibeen said:
Fuck me.
We’re all doomed anyway, why not…
(ps: I’m going in dry)
If Trump wins, I will stop going to news sites.
There’s going to be a lot of celebrities going into rehab.

Are they sure he was born in the USA?

CrazyNeutrino said:
!https://i.imgflip.com/1dsp2b.jpg
Probably a good thing really.

Anthony Green has Trump on 274.
ASX down 4%/

Ha, with all the vitriol not everyone was telling pollsters the truth, as I said, what they say and what happens in the privacy of a poll booth…
so so funny…
it’s like brexit all over again…
CNN has predicted that Clinton will win California…news at 11.
AwesomeO said:
Ha, with all the vitriol not everyone was telling pollsters the truth, as I said, what they say and what happens in the privacy of a poll booth…
I think studies have shown that is not the case. I think it’s more likely that it is the polling that is wrong.
Depending on the outcome shares in concrete will drop very low or go very high
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:
Ha, with all the vitriol not everyone was telling pollsters the truth, as I said, what they say and what happens in the privacy of a poll booth…
I think studies have shown that is not the case. I think it’s more likely that it is the polling that is wrong.
Sorry that might not have been clear. What I am saying is that people are telling pollsters the truth but it is instead that the assumptions the pollsters use to extrapolate for the general population are flawed. In particular I think the end of the landline makes it difficult to get an accurate survey of voting intentions.
Anthony Green has call North Carolina. I’m very close to calling it for Trump.
lock her up lock her up …
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:
Ha, with all the vitriol not everyone was telling pollsters the truth, as I said, what they say and what happens in the privacy of a poll booth…
I think studies have shown that is not the case. I think it’s more likely that it is the polling that is wrong.
That is what I said.
diddly-squat said:
so so funny…
it’s like brexit all over again…
Yup, gonna be a lot of soul searching over this one. And a lot of embarrassed talking heads.
AwesomeO said:
diddly-squat said:so so funny…
it’s like brexit all over again…
Yup, gonna be a lot of soul searching over this one. And a lot of embarrassed talking heads.
yep… and a whole bunch of people that said they were going to leave, not leaving…
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:
diddly-squat said:so so funny…
it’s like brexit all over again…
Yup, gonna be a lot of soul searching over this one. And a lot of embarrassed talking heads.
yep… and a whole bunch of people that said they were going to leave, not leaving…
kii still has a bed at your house though ?
The most hilarious thing is that the GOP will have total government control and will be able to execute their policy agenda at will…
roffle roffle roffle…
Cymek said:
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:Yup, gonna be a lot of soul searching over this one. And a lot of embarrassed talking heads.
yep… and a whole bunch of people that said they were going to leave, not leaving…
kii still has a bed at your house though ?
we keep wizarding folk under the stairs here…
diddly-squat said:
The most hilarious thing is that the GOP will have total government control and will be able to execute their policy agenda at will…
roffle roffle roffle…
It’ll be the USA from the 50s.
Cymek said:
kii still has a bed at your house though ?
Hah. That’s what I was gonna say.
Well now I am annoyed. It’s cut into Judge Judy. I only came in for that.
diddly-squat said:
The most hilarious thing is that the GOP will have total government control and will be able to execute their policy agenda at will…
roffle roffle roffle…
Be interesting to see what Trump’s actual economic policy will turn out to be, particularly with regards to free trade versus protectionism. He might shake up the global economy just a little bit if he moves away from free trade.
diddly-squat said:
The most hilarious thing is that the GOP will have total government control and will be able to execute their policy agenda at will…
roffle roffle roffle…
May you live in interesting times.
AwesomeO said:
Annoyed about USA?
Well now I am annoyed. It’s cut into Judge Judy. I only came in for that.
party_pants said:
diddly-squat said:The most hilarious thing is that the GOP will have total government control and will be able to execute their policy agenda at will…
roffle roffle roffle…
Be interesting to see what Trump’s actual economic policy will turn out to be, particularly with regards to free trade versus protectionism. He might shake up the global economy just a little bit if he moves away from free trade.
it doesn’t have to be ‘his’ policy… the party will fill in the blanks on his policy agenda on his behalf…
party_pants said:
Be interesting to see what Trump’s actual economic policy will turn out to be, particularly with regards to free trade versus protectionism. He might shake up the global economy just a little bit if he moves away from free trade.
Yeah. That is my greatest worry.
diddly-squat said:
party_pants said:
diddly-squat said:The most hilarious thing is that the GOP will have total government control and will be able to execute their policy agenda at will…
roffle roffle roffle…
Be interesting to see what Trump’s actual economic policy will turn out to be, particularly with regards to free trade versus protectionism. He might shake up the global economy just a little bit if he moves away from free trade.
it doesn’t have to be ‘his’ policy… the party will fill in the blanks on his policy agenda on his behalf…
The party’s policies and Trump’s rhetoric are contradictory. The only way to “stop the jobs leaving America” is to reverse the path towards more free trade and adopt protectionism. Which is the opposite of the usual right-wing thinking.
Michael V said:
AwesomeO said:Annoyed about USA?
Well now I am annoyed. It’s cut into Judge Judy. I only came in for that.
Annoyed at Channel 10. But this is amusing as well. Talking head is at a location saying Hilary is due out for a speech and speculating if it is a concession speech.
I think one of the factors that hasn’t really been spoken about is probably the fact that Hillary is a woman… an the good boys probably aren’t as ready to embrace female political rule as we thought they were…
party_pants said:
diddly-squat said:
party_pants said:Be interesting to see what Trump’s actual economic policy will turn out to be, particularly with regards to free trade versus protectionism. He might shake up the global economy just a little bit if he moves away from free trade.
it doesn’t have to be ‘his’ policy… the party will fill in the blanks on his policy agenda on his behalf…
The party’s policies and Trump’s rhetoric are contradictory. The only way to “stop the jobs leaving America” is to reverse the path towards more free trade and adopt protectionism. Which is the opposite of the usual right-wing thinking.
I think you will find that the policy agenda spoken about and the policy agenda pursued will be two very different things…
Witty Rejoinder said:
party_pants said:Be interesting to see what Trump’s actual economic policy will turn out to be, particularly with regards to free trade versus protectionism. He might shake up the global economy just a little bit if he moves away from free trade.
Yeah. That is my greatest worry.
I’m not all that worried about it, just that it will take a decade or so before the benefits are felt. There will be disruption and decline for the short term before things adjust.
the general feeling is that it’s been disaffected democrats that have swung this thing…
I’m starting a sweep on how long until the impeachment.
party_pants said:
I’m not all that worried about it, just that it will take a decade or so before the benefits are felt. There will be disruption and decline for the short term before things adjust.
Benefits of protectionism?
diddly-squat said:
I think one of the factors that hasn’t really been spoken about is probably the fact that Hillary is a woman… an the good boys probably aren’t as ready to embrace female political rule as we thought they were…
They’d rather have a black man than a white woman .
AwesomeO said:
Ah, I see.
Michael V said:
AwesomeO said:Annoyed about USA?
Well now I am annoyed. It’s cut into Judge Judy. I only came in for that.
Annoyed at Channel 10. But this is amusing as well. Talking head is at a location saying Hilary is due out for a speech and speculating if it is a concession speech.
:)
Dropbear said:
I’m starting a sweep on how long until the impeachment.
trump is already peach
Dropbear said:
They’d rather have a black man than a white woman .
Bros before hoes…
Dropbear said:
diddly-squat said:I think one of the factors that hasn’t really been spoken about is probably the fact that Hillary is a woman… an the good boys probably aren’t as ready to embrace female political rule as we thought they were…
They’d rather have a black man than a white woman .
pretty sure I’ve seen that video
Dropbear said:
I’m starting a sweep on how long until the impeachment.
attempted/successful assassination here.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2016-election-results-coverage/
538 has it Trump 59% chance of winning.
FUCK ME
I get distracted trying fucking Windows 10 drivers and look over there and my Yank FITHometer is flashing red!
Michigan is getting more favourable for Clinton now and some boffinators are saying there are enough Dem heavy areas to carry Clinton there.
But not Wisconsin. That’s a real kick in the nards.
She’ll need Arizona.
ChrispenEvan said:
Dropbear said:
I’m starting a sweep on how long until the impeachment.attempted/successful assassination here.
The US supreme court is headed WAY right .. and those cunts are there for life …
THAT is the actual worst result of this whole debacle.
Trump wants to impose term limits on those in congress. Be interesting to see how that goes down on the hill.
Dropbear said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Dropbear said:
I’m starting a sweep on how long until the impeachment.attempted/successful assassination here.
The US supreme court is headed WAY right .. and those cunts are there for life …
THAT is the actual worst result of this whole debacle.
Yep. The Republicans are going to retain the Senate by 51-49 at least.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2016-election-results-coverage/
538; Trump 78%, Clinton 20%.
sibeen said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2016-election-results-coverage/538; Trump 78%, Clinton 20%.
rofl
So what will a united congress and presidency do straight away?
What else?
Witty Rejoinder said:
Trump wants to impose term limits on those in congress. Be interesting to see how that goes down on the hill.
Probably impossible. I have read most of Woodwards books and it seems to be that it is impossible to legislate or change anything radically without everyone being on board. Too many checks and balances. Even if the prez wants to do something congress vetoes or stops funding.
Ian said:
FUCK MEI get distracted trying fucking Windows 10 drivers and look over there and my Yank FITHometer is flashing red!
Yeah me too. Windows 10 just decided to run an update :(
diddly-squat said:
party_pants said:
diddly-squat said:it doesn’t have to be ‘his’ policy… the party will fill in the blanks on his policy agenda on his behalf…
The party’s policies and Trump’s rhetoric are contradictory. The only way to “stop the jobs leaving America” is to reverse the path towards more free trade and adopt protectionism. Which is the opposite of the usual right-wing thinking.
I think you will find that the policy agenda spoken about and the policy agenda pursued will be two very different things…
this is why I think it will be interesting to find out.
party_pants said:
Ian said:
FUCK MEI get distracted trying fucking Windows 10 drivers and look over there and my Yank FITHometer is flashing red!
Yeah me too. Windows 10 just decided to run an update :(
It’s a conspiracy.
Witty Rejoinder said:
So what will a united congress and presidency do straight away?
- Overturn Obamacare
- appoint a conservative JOTSC
What else?
Invade Poland.
Maybe like Brexit the chattering classes with agitate for another vote till the morons get it right.
I think I might shut down for a few years …
http://fivethirtyeight.com/live-blog/2016-election-results-coverage/
538.
Trump 84%, Clinton 14%.
dv said:
I think I might shut down for a few years …
I think I might do a black dog series.
I am even more gorbleschmitten than when howard got in the last time around..
Only possibly way now is if Michigan and Arizona go blue and I am not seeing that…
I wonder if Trump is now thinking…WTF?
sibeen said:
I wonder ifTrumpMr Garrison is now thinking…WTF?
dv said:
Only possibly way now is if Michigan and Arizona go blue and I am not seeing that…
Yeah, it’s not quite over, A Green has it 217 to 197 so there is still an outside chance that we can save Poland.
I’ve been disappointed by election results but this is fucking amazing.
Trump ahead in Pennsylvania.
sibeen said:
Trump ahead in Pennsylvania.
That will be the nail in the coffin.
dv said:
I’ve been disappointed by election results but this is fucking amazing.
One of my supervisors said to me once..Ros you aren’t anxiety ridden and insane. You’re critically sane. I feel critically sane at the moment. Wtf?
sigh
sibeen said:
I wonder if Trump is now thinking…WTF?
He has the same expression on his face that Osama did when the first tower came down.
Hilary be praying to the God of hanging chads.
I mean this isn’t just some game and my favourite team lost. Tens of millions of people are going to lose health coverage: in the USA that basically means if you are poor and gravely Ill, you’re gonna die. Russia will know NATO is pus now. Action on climate change will cease. College funding plans are cancelled. Minimum wage increases, cancelled. The new Supreme Court justices will overturn abortion rights and campaign finance restrictions, rule even more local gun control unconstitutional. Trade wars are likely. The high end tax cuts will add trillions to the deficit. Basically all progress from the last 8 years is probably gone and all of the progress on the Democrat side won’t happen. It is a real and serious development quite beyond the mere fact of Trump’s unsuitability.
LOL, the ol leaving the country meme on 10.
AwesomeO said:
LOL, the ol leaving the country meme on 10.
Ten network? Who?
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:
LOL, the ol leaving the country meme on 10.
Ten network? Who?
Talking head from America reporting speaking to democrat voters.
dv said:
I mean this isn’t just some game and my favourite team lost. Tens of millions of people are going to lose health coverage: in the USA that basically means if you are poor and gravely Ill, you’re gonna die. Russia will know NATO is pus now. Action on climate change will cease. College funding plans are cancelled. Minimum wage increases, cancelled. The new Supreme Court justices will overturn abortion rights and campaign finance restrictions, rule even more local gun control unconstitutional. Trade wars are likely. The high end tax cuts will add trillions to the deficit. Basically all progress from the last 8 years is probably gone and all of the progress on the Democrat side won’t happen. It is a real and serious development quite beyond the mere fact of Trump’s unsuitability.
Well, I wasn’t planning on moving there any time soon anyway.
dv said:
Only possibly way now is if Michigan and Arizona go blue and I am not seeing that…
has DV called the election?
MAYBE
dv said:
I mean this isn’t just some game and my favourite team lost. Tens of millions of people are going to lose health coverage: in the USA that basically means if you are poor and gravely Ill, you’re gonna die. Russia will know NATO is pus now. Action on climate change will cease. College funding plans are cancelled. Minimum wage increases, cancelled. The new Supreme Court justices will overturn abortion rights and campaign finance restrictions, rule even more local gun control unconstitutional. Trade wars are likely. The high end tax cuts will add trillions to the deficit. Basically all progress from the last 8 years is probably gone and all of the progress on the Democrat side won’t happen. It is a real and serious development quite beyond the mere fact of Trump’s unsuitability.
Plus if the USA does the above other nations will say will why shouldn’t we do the same.
I wonder how the late night talk show hosts are going to play this?
party_pants said:
dv said:
I mean this isn’t just some game and my favourite team lost. Tens of millions of people are going to lose health coverage: in the USA that basically means if you are poor and gravely Ill, you’re gonna die. Russia will know NATO is pus now. Action on climate change will cease. College funding plans are cancelled. Minimum wage increases, cancelled. The new Supreme Court justices will overturn abortion rights and campaign finance restrictions, rule even more local gun control unconstitutional. Trade wars are likely. The high end tax cuts will add trillions to the deficit. Basically all progress from the last 8 years is probably gone and all of the progress on the Democrat side won’t happen. It is a real and serious development quite beyond the mere fact of Trump’s unsuitability.
Well, I wasn’t planning on moving there any time soon anyway.
Where? To a planet where what the USA does affects the whole world? Like Earth?
Peak Warming Man said:
I wonder how the late night talk show hosts are going to play this?
A lot of political pundits would be better off saying nothing, they have got it all wrong so far.
It will funny if Mexican border control has to turn back a mass invasion of US citizens fleeing
Cymek said:
:)
It will funny if Mexican border control has to turn back a mass invasion of US citizens fleeing
The false trumpet concealing madness will cause Byzantium to change its laws. From Egypt there will go forth a man who wants the edict withdrawn, changing money and standards.
The trumpet shakes with great discord. An agreement broken: lifting the face to heaven: the bloody mouth will swim with blood; the face anointed with milk and honey lies on the ground.Nostradamus, 16th Century
NATE SILVER 12:09 AM
While the third-party vote wasn’t all that high tonight overall, an exception came among younger voters. According to the national exit poll, 9 percent of voters ages 18 to 29 went for third parties, as did 8 percent of voters ages 30 to 44.
dv said:
NATE SILVER 12:09 AM
While the third-party vote wasn’t all that high tonight overall, an exception came among younger voters. According to the national exit poll, 9 percent of voters ages 18 to 29 went for third parties, as did 8 percent of voters ages 30 to 44.
Well, ain’t they dickheads.
If he wins and no one comes back from the future to stop him it kind of proves backwards time travel isn’t possible
Funnily enough exit polls indicate 29% of Latinos voted for Trump which is more than Romney got.
dv said:
Funnily enough exit polls indicate 29% of Latinos voted for Trump which is more than Romney got.
Not all Latinos are illegal immigrants.
dv said:
NATE SILVER 12:09 AM
While the third-party vote wasn’t all that high tonight overall, an exception came among younger voters. According to the national exit poll, 9 percent of voters ages 18 to 29 went for third parties, as did 8 percent of voters ages 30 to 44.
and there it is… at least in a system with preferential voting you can protest and still get a reasonable outcome… there it’s just vote for old mate and thanks very much for comming
Cymek said:
If he wins and no one comes back from the future to stop him it kind of proves backwards time travel isn’t possible
or, that is was the best decision the USA ever made…
It’s all about infrastructure, the wall will be like the Hoover dam.
sibeen said:
dv said:
NATE SILVER 12:09 AM
While the third-party vote wasn’t all that high tonight overall, an exception came among younger voters. According to the national exit poll, 9 percent of voters ages 18 to 29 went for third parties, as did 8 percent of voters ages 30 to 44.Well, ain’t they dickheads.
Who gave young people the vote??
diddly-squat said:
Cymek said:
If he wins and no one comes back from the future to stop him it kind of proves backwards time travel isn’t possible
or, that is was the best decision the USA ever made…
Shut up you
ABC News 24 says Trump won the popular vote by 1%.
Hillary concede Goddammit… I have stuff to do today!
Breaking: “Orange is new the black”
Dropbear said:
Breaking: “Orange is new the black”
ha
Even if it turns dramatically and Clinton wins, this is still an excellent result.
Civilised revolution. Revolution by democratic vote; what an extraordinarily positive thing this is.
I wonder if the “political elites” are getting the message yet. They misjudged Brexit, and now they’ve misjudged Trump. More and more people are getting tired of their two-faced, condescending, corrupt, self serving bullshit. They better pay attention, because the civility will only stretch so far and when it snaps, it’ll be guns and guillotines…
Congratulations to the people of the USA for not taking the easy way.
Principles do matter, and no-one shall take away our liberty.
So it doesn’t look like humanity has yet passed The Great Filter
Witty Rejoinder said:
ABC News 24 says Trump won the popular vote by 1%.
538 projects Clinton will win the popular vote by 1.1%
esselte said:
Even if it turns dramatically and Clinton wins, this is still an excellent result.Civilised revolution. Revolution by democratic vote; what an extraordinarily positive thing this is.
I wonder if the “political elites” are getting the message yet. They misjudged Brexit, and now they’ve misjudged Trump. More and more people are getting tired of their two-faced, condescending, corrupt, self serving bullshit. They better pay attention, because the civility will only stretch so far and when it snaps, it’ll be guns and guillotines…
Congratulations to the people of the USA for not taking the easy way.
Principles do matter, and no-one shall take away our liberty.
If Trump wins it will be the biggest win for America’s elites since 1984.
Talcum must rush through legislation to strengthen our borders against waves of Merican immigrants.
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
ABC News 24 says Trump won the popular vote by 1%.
538 projects Clinton will win the popular vote by 1.1%
It was on a ticker. Maybe i misread it.
esselte said:
Even if it turns dramatically and Clinton wins, this is still an excellent result.Civilised revolution. Revolution by democratic vote; what an extraordinarily positive thing this is.
I wonder if the “political elites” are getting the message yet. They misjudged Brexit, and now they’ve misjudged Trump. More and more people are getting tired of their two-faced, condescending, corrupt, self serving bullshit. They better pay attention, because the civility will only stretch so far and when it snaps, it’ll be guns and guillotines…
Congratulations to the people of the USA for not taking the easy way.
Principles do matter, and no-one shall take away our liberty.
unfortunately yes, a revolution.
I think we should all remember what the great warrior-poet Ice Cube once said
“If the day does not require an AK, it is good”
“If Trump wins it will be the biggest win for America’s elites since 1984.”
I disagree entirely. Trump is far from the ideal candidate, but if you think he has anything other than pariah status amongst his former friends, the elite… well time will tell I guess.
A Clinton win will be the biggest win for America’s elites, since…uhh…. Animal Farm.
Trumpet is part of the Elite anyway, all this talk of protesting against he establishment, Trump is part of it.
esselte said:
“If Trump wins it will be the biggest win for America’s elites since 1984.”
I disagree entirely. Trump is far from the ideal candidate, but if you think he has anything other than pariah status amongst his former friends, the elite… well time will tell I guess.
A Clinton win will be the biggest win for America’s elites, since…uhh…. Animal Farm.
America’s elites are billionaire oligarchs who gained the majority of the benefits of the recovery. This election means they’ll get a massive tax cut and freedom to invest in the political process without limit.
esselte said:
“If Trump wins it will be the biggest win for America’s elites since 1984.”
I disagree entirely. Trump is far from the ideal candidate, but if you think he has anything other than pariah status amongst his former friends, the elite… well time will tell I guess.
A Clinton win will be the biggest win for America’s elites, since…uhh…. Animal Farm.
I wonder if anyone is just waiting for the results to prepare an invasion of a neighbouring state
CrazyNeutrino said:
Trumpet is part of the Elite anyway, all this talk of protesting against he establishment, Trump is part of it.
He is a money whore, I bet most of what he proposes feathers the nests of the already rich and powerful
dv said:
America’s elites are billionaire oligarchs who gained the majority of the benefits of the recovery. This election means they’ll get a massive tax cut and freedom to invest in the political process without limit.
If that’s the path they choose to take, guns and guillotines my friend.
So yes, Trump’s victory would be a victory for the elite.
Meanwhile the policy set of the Clinton campaign was raising minimum wage, expanding healthcare and improving funding for schools and training.
If Trump gets over the line it is a big victory for the elite and a real kick in the guts for regular people.
esselte said:
dv said:
America’s elites are billionaire oligarchs who gained the majority of the benefits of the recovery. This election means they’ll get a massive tax cut and freedom to invest in the political process without limit.
If that’s the path they choose to take, guns and guillotines my friend.
“The path they choose to take”
Wtf are you talking about? It is his actual policy.
USA today

dv said:
So yes, Trump’s victory would be a victory for the elite.Meanwhile the policy set of the Clinton campaign was raising minimum wage, expanding healthcare and improving funding for schools and training.
If Trump gets over the line it is a big victory for the elite and a real kick in the guts for regular people.
except it’s the regular people that voted him in.
dv said:
Wtf are you talking about? It is his actual policy.
I know what Trump’s policies are. I don’t care about his policies, as they are in large part stupid and unworkable.
I am not saying Trump will be a good President. He will be fucking awful.
This election is not about Trump’s policies.
this seriously is the funniest thing I’ve witnessed since Brexit.
what a bunch of clowns
diddly-squat said:
this seriously is the funniest thing I’ve witnessed since Brexit.
what a bunch of clowns
Yep.
esselte said:
dv said:
Wtf are you talking about? It is his actual policy.
I know what Trump’s policies are. I don’t care about his policies, as they are in large part stupid and unworkable.
I am not saying Trump will be a good President. He will be fucking awful.
This election is not about Trump’s policies.
Yes, I reckon there is a bit of a burn the joint down. There would have been the calculation that how can Trump make things worse for me, and Hilary promises only more of the same so…fuck it.
diddly-squat said:
this seriously is the funniest thing I’ve witnessed since Brexit.
what a bunch of clowns
Look on the bright side; The Gran will now be able to have at least 6 articles on this a day, for the next year or so. This will go hand in hand with the 6 articles a day they have at the moment whinging about brexit. Journos will be rolling in it like weather girls.
i wonder when we’ll get a visit? and will the public ways be thronged?
sibeen said:
diddly-squat said:this seriously is the funniest thing I’ve witnessed since Brexit.
what a bunch of clowns
Look on the bright side; The Gran will now be able to have at least 6 articles on this a day, for the next year or so. This will go hand in hand with the 6 articles a day they have at the moment whinging about brexit. Journos will be rolling in it like weather girls.
And Top Gear is starting again under the name Gear Knobs so any remaining articles can be lambasting Clarkson.
sibeen said:
diddly-squat said:this seriously is the funniest thing I’ve witnessed since Brexit.
what a bunch of clowns
Look on the bright side; The Gran will now be able to have at least 6 articles on this a day, for the next year or so. This will go hand in hand with the 6 articles a day they have at the moment whinging about brexit. Journos will be rolling in it like weather girls.
#jobsforweathergirls
I suppose there will be jokes now about grabbing pussy in the Oval Office.
Wonder if this is going to have any effect on his upcoming fraud and rape trials.
Mike Pence must be thinking he has a pretty good shot of being President at this stage,
Imagine if the Democrats had put up someone like Justin Trudeu from Canada, instead of a hated, mistrusted part of the political establishment that they were oh so willing to protest vote against.
Someone with some charisma and genuine charm (obama like)..
CrazyNeutrino said:
I suppose there will be jokes now about grabbing pussy in the Oval Office.
Trump will make gaffe after gaffe like TA did.

diddly-squat said:
this seriously is the funniest thing I’ve witnessed since Brexit.
what a bunch of clowns
It’s not funny if you’re living under the NATO nuclear shield right now ..
The main person laughing is Vlad P.
Dropbear said:
Imagine if the Democrats had put up someone like Justin Trudeu from Canada, instead of a hated, mistrusted part of the political establishment that they were oh so willing to protest vote against.Someone with some charisma and genuine charm (obama like)..
Bernie is looking quite good right about now.
sibeen said:
Dropbear said:
Imagine if the Democrats had put up someone like Justin Trudeu from Canada, instead of a hated, mistrusted part of the political establishment that they were oh so willing to protest vote against.Someone with some charisma and genuine charm (obama like)..
Bernie is looking quite good right about now.
Bernie has that “mad as a cut snake” socialist dreamer vibe about him.
AwesomeO said:
esselte said:
dv said:
Wtf are you talking about? It is his actual policy.
I know what Trump’s policies are. I don’t care about his policies, as they are in large part stupid and unworkable.
I am not saying Trump will be a good President. He will be fucking awful.
This election is not about Trump’s policies.
Yes, I reckon there is a bit of a burn the joint down. There would have been the calculation that how can Trump make things worse for me, and Hilary promises only more of the same so…fuck it.
Yet that is the effect. T
AwesomeO said:
esselte said:
dv said:
Wtf are you talking about? It is his actual policy.
I know what Trump’s policies are. I don’t care about his policies, as they are in large part stupid and unworkable.
I am not saying Trump will be a good President. He will be fucking awful.
This election is not about Trump’s policies.
Yes, I reckon there is a bit of a burn the joint down. There would have been the calculation that how can Trump make things worse for me, and Hilary promises only more of the same so…fuck it.
Yet that is the effect. The effect will be to further enrich the elite and grind ordinary Americans further into the ground.
AwesomeO said:
esselte said:
dv said:
Wtf are you talking about? It is his actual policy.
I know what Trump’s policies are. I don’t care about his policies, as they are in large part stupid and unworkable.
I am not saying Trump will be a good President. He will be fucking awful.
This election is not about Trump’s policies.
Yes, I reckon there is a bit of a burn the joint down. There would have been the calculation that how can Trump make things worse for me, and Hilary promises only more of the same so…fuck it.
and the election results are in

dv said:
AwesomeO said:
esselte said:I know what Trump’s policies are. I don’t care about his policies, as they are in large part stupid and unworkable.
I am not saying Trump will be a good President. He will be fucking awful.
This election is not about Trump’s policies.
Yes, I reckon there is a bit of a burn the joint down. There would have been the calculation that how can Trump make things worse for me, and Hilary promises only more of the same so…fuck it.
Yet that is the effect. The effect will be to further enrich the elite and grind ordinary Americans further into the ground.
yeah… but they’ll think they’ve won…
On the positive side, some states have voted to legalise marijuana…
Hmmmm. Legalise marijuana – elect Trump. Is there a correlation here?
“Yet that is the effect. The effect will be to further enrich the elite and grind ordinary Americans further into the ground.”
And yet here we are, with Trump looking very likely to win.
It seems your analysis is falling short in at least one respect, as it does not match reality.
Unless you really think half the American electorate is stupid enough to vote against their own interests.
diddly-squat said:
I reckon that’s a distinct possibility.
!http://i.imgur.com/T21ZkrO.jpg
esselte said:
Unless you really think half the American electorate is stupid enough to vote against their own interests.
yeah, who’d think that?

esselte said:
“Yet that is the effect. The effect will be to further enrich the elite and grind ordinary Americans further into the ground.”
And yet here we are, with Trump looking very likely to win.
It seems your analysis is falling short in at least one respect, as it does not match reality.
Unless you really think half the American electorate is stupid enough to vote against their own interests.
That is a possibility
Dropbear said:
sibeen said:
Dropbear said:
Imagine if the Democrats had put up someone like Justin Trudeu from Canada, instead of a hated, mistrusted part of the political establishment that they were oh so willing to protest vote against.Someone with some charisma and genuine charm (obama like)..
Bernie is looking quite good right about now.
Bernie has that “mad as a cut snake” socialist dreamer vibe about him.
mad as a cut snake means angry not certifiable. though you can be ‘crazy” with anger.
diddly-squat said:
this seriously is the funniest thing I’ve witnessed since Brexit.
what a bunch of clowns
Funny ?
I’ve just watched some people who are on a closed fb group express real fear for their lives. They are not laughing.
berning down the house?
kii said:
diddly-squat said:this seriously is the funniest thing I’ve witnessed since Brexit.
what a bunch of clowns
Funny ?
I’ve just watched some people who are on a closed fb group express real fear for their lives. They are not laughing.
Are they part of a minority group Trump doesn’t like
I wonder if Hillary owns a sniper rifle
On the Drum, ABC has called it for Trump.
Cymek said:
esselte said:“Yet that is the effect. The effect will be to further enrich the elite and grind ordinary Americans further into the ground.”
And yet here we are, with Trump looking very likely to win.
It seems your analysis is falling short in at least one respect, as it does not match reality.
Unless you really think half the American electorate is stupid enough to vote against their own interests.
That is a possibility
???
The American experience over the past 100 years has seen large groups of people voting against their own interests. I am sure you know this.
AwesomeO said:
On the Drum, ABC has called it for Trump.
So have I.
Antony Green calls the election for Donald Trump.
May as well go home now.
dv said:
Cymek said:
esselte said:“Yet that is the effect. The effect will be to further enrich the elite and grind ordinary Americans further into the ground.”
And yet here we are, with Trump looking very likely to win.
It seems your analysis is falling short in at least one respect, as it does not match reality.
Unless you really think half the American electorate is stupid enough to vote against their own interests.
That is a possibility
???
The American experience over the past 100 years has seen large groups of people voting against their own interests. I am sure you know this.
Yes I agree, Australians do it as well
kii said:
diddly-squat said:this seriously is the funniest thing I’ve witnessed since Brexit.
what a bunch of clowns
Funny ?
I’ve just watched some people who are on a closed fb group express real fear for their lives. They are not laughing.
Why are they in fear?
Green has called it

moments like these i am glad i don’t have a telly.
sibeen said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:this seriously is the funniest thing I’ve witnessed since Brexit.
what a bunch of clowns
Funny ?
I’ve just watched some people who are on a closed fb group express real fear for their lives. They are not laughing.
Why are they in fear?
Rioting democrats?
stock market has slumped.. buy buy buy
Arts said:
Green has called it
Has US TV called it?
dv said:
The American experience over the past 100 years has seen large groups of people voting against their own interests. I am sure you know this.
I can only see two possibilities here. Either their reasoning is inscrutable to you, or they have been tricked in to voting such by a politician who is misrepresenting what they will offer those people.
If there is one thing Trump has not done over the last year, it is misrepresent himself.

esselte said:
dv said:
The American experience over the past 100 years has seen large groups of people voting against their own interests. I am sure you know this.
I can only see two possibilities here. Either their reasoning is inscrutable to you, or they have been tricked in to voting such by a politician who is misrepresenting what they will offer those people.
If there is one thing Trump has not done over the last year, it is misrepresent himself.
ROFL. That last sentence is hilarious.

AwesomeO said:
sibeen said:
kii said:Funny ?
I’ve just watched some people who are on a closed fb group express real fear for their lives. They are not laughing.
Why are they in fear?
Rioting democrats?
Perhaps they have pre-existing medical conditions and will die without the coverage provided by the Affordable Care Act
dv said:
ROFL. That last sentence is hilarious.
If the last year is anything to go by, Trump is a bigoted, thin skinned, moronic dill with absolutely no clue about how to run a country. That is the general consensus is it not?
So, if he has been misrepresenting himself for the last year, that is a good thing.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Arts said:
Green has called it
Has US TV called it?
PA has called it. CNN has not.
But basically it requires a miracle from here
esselte said:
dv said:
The American experience over the past 100 years has seen large groups of people voting against their own interests. I am sure you know this.
I can only see two possibilities here. Either their reasoning is inscrutable to you, or they have been tricked in to voting such by a politician who is misrepresenting what they will offer those people.
If there is one thing Trump has not done over the last year, it is misrepresent himself.
Wouldn’t he appeal to the lowest common denominator though the poorly educated racist bigots who love him cause he blames Muslims/Mexians/etc for the USA’s decline, spout off a whole bunch of patriotic bullshit that many seem to love. They vote him cause he’s loud and so typically American even though he probably wants to shaft most of them
Cymek said:
Wouldn’t he appeal to the lowest common denominator though the poorly educated racist bigots who love him cause he blames Muslims/Mexians/etc for the USA’s decline, spout off a whole bunch of patriotic bullshit that many seem to love. They vote him cause he’s loud and so typically American even though he probably wants to shaft most of them
I think there are subtleties which could be discussed here, but the simplest answer is Yes, but such people do not make up enough of the American population to win him the Presidency.
Srsly esselte, the whole dynamic of the USA has been keeping ordinary white people down by turning their anger against non-whites so they don’t turn their anger against the elite. This is an episode of that.
Srsly esselte, the whole dynamic of the USA has been keeping ordinary white people down by turning their anger against non-whites so they don’t turn their anger against the elite. This is an episode of that.

esselte said:
Cymek said:
Wouldn’t he appeal to the lowest common denominator though the poorly educated racist bigots who love him cause he blames Muslims/Mexians/etc for the USA’s decline, spout off a whole bunch of patriotic bullshit that many seem to love. They vote him cause he’s loud and so typically American even though he probably wants to shaft most of them
I think there are subtleties which could be discussed here, but the simplest answer is Yes, but such people do not make up enough of the American population to win him the Presidency.
Add in anyone who doesn’t want a women president as well even if she is the better choice and they vote for Trump.
Clinton has bunkered down and not going to make a speech until tomorrow. Praying for chads no doubt.
dv said:
Srsly esselte, the whole dynamic of the USA has been keeping ordinary white people down by turning their anger against non-whites so they don’t turn their anger against the elite. This is an episode of that.
That I can agree with :)
But now, people are angry with the elite and it is that which has turned them off Clinton. It’s a positive thing. It’s not going to be sunshine and butterflies, but at least the anger is being directed to the correct place now.
AwesomeO said:
Clinton has bunkered down and not going to make a speech until tomorrow. Praying for chads no doubt.
Ah well it hasn’t been called yet but she should be ready to go as soon as it has been called.
esselte said:
dv said:
Srsly esselte, the whole dynamic of the USA has been keeping ordinary white people down by turning their anger against non-whites so they don’t turn their anger against the elite. This is an episode of that.
That I can agree with :)
But now, people are angry with the elite and it is that which has turned them off Clinton. It’s a positive thing. It’s not going to be sunshine and butterflies, but at least the anger is being directed to the correct place now.
I wonder though how tough Trump is would he stare down Putin and make Russia back down if they decided to expand their territory cause a supposed buffoon is now president.
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
Clinton has bunkered down and not going to make a speech until tomorrow. Praying for chads no doubt.
Ah well it hasn’t been called yet but she should be ready to go as soon as it has been called.
She can take comfort in against the worst candidate in history she fought it to a narrow victory…to be confirmed to who.
Someone will have to start a Gaffe site.
Cymek said:
I wonder though how tough Trump is would he stare down Putin and make Russia back down if they decided to expand their territory cause a supposed buffoon is now president.
I don’t think he will stare down Putin. I think he will seek co-operation.
Russia, meanwhile, has two choices. They can let NATO march right up to their borders, or they can expand their territory. In other words, Russia will seek to expand it’s territory; it has no choice if it wants to remain a world power. Clinton would have taken us to war over this. Trump is far less likely to do so.
Interestingly it is still the case that the Republicans have only once won the popular vote in a Presidential election since the 1980s
So, when is the U.S.‘s next war going to start, and who is likely to be against?
mcgoon said:
So, when is the U.S.‘s next war going to start, and who is likely to be against?
I wonder how Trump will deal with Assad? Hostile, indifferent or friendly
The Gran has given Trump 276 electoral votes.
mcgoon said:
So, when is the U.S.‘s next war going to start, and who is likely to be against?
Itself
sibeen said:
The Gran has given Trump 276 electoral votes.
Only Aliens can save Clinton now.
Cymek said:
I wonder though how tough Trump is would he stare down Putin and make Russia back down if they decided to expand their territory cause a supposed buffoon is now president.
I can’t see Trump backing the Baltic NATO states against Russian aggression.
CrazyNeutrino said:
mcgoon said:
So, when is the U.S.‘s next war going to start, and who is likely to be against?
I wonder how Trump will deal with Assad? Hostile, indifferent or friendly
Give it to Putin, Syria was always in the Soviet/Russian sway anyway. Assad is their man.
On the bright side, Australia hasn’t lost a wicket in 2 days.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:I wonder though how tough Trump is would he stare down Putin and make Russia back down if they decided to expand their territory cause a supposed buffoon is now president.
I can’t see Trump backing the Baltic NATO states against Russian aggression.
He is a business man, so he might look at the political environment in a different way.
AwesomeO said:
Clinton has bunkered down and not going to make a speech until tomorrow. Praying for chads no doubt.
That is gutless.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:I wonder though how tough Trump is would he stare down Putin and make Russia back down if they decided to expand their territory cause a supposed buffoon is now president.
I can’t see Trump backing the Baltic NATO states against Russian aggression.
He is a business man, so he might look at the political environment in a different way.
Maybe a carve up?
Ian said:
On the bright side, Australia hasn’t lost a wicket in 2 days.
roffle
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:
Clinton has bunkered down and not going to make a speech until tomorrow. Praying for chads no doubt.
That is gutless.
She might be in shock.
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:
Clinton has bunkered down and not going to make a speech until tomorrow. Praying for chads no doubt.
That is gutless.
She probably didn’t have a speech ready for this eventuality.
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:
Clinton has bunkered down and not going to make a speech until tomorrow. Praying for chads no doubt.
That is gutless.
or she’s getting outa Dodge
diddly-squat said:
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:
Clinton has bunkered down and not going to make a speech until tomorrow. Praying for chads no doubt.
That is gutless.
or she’s getting outa Dodge
Probably practicing her Canadian
Hillary “Gotta remember to add “aeh” at the end of each sentence”
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:
Clinton has bunkered down and not going to make a speech until tomorrow. Praying for chads no doubt.
That is gutless.
I’ll forgive her if she concedes bright and early in the morning.
Clinton has called Trump to concede.
sibeen said:
Clinton has called Trump to concede.
So, she is in Shock. Thought so.
FMD they’re playing the music from ‘Airforce One’.
Witty Rejoinder said:
I can’t see Trump backing the Baltic NATO states against Russian aggression.
I think that, over the next four years, we’re going to see a lot of ‘say one thing, do another’.
sibeen said:
Clinton has called Trump to concede.
“It is finished.”
~ J.C.
Ian said:
mcgoon said:
So, when is the U.S.‘s next war going to start, and who is likely to be against?
Itself
:-(
roffle..

Listening to Trump’s plans to employ millions of people to build infrastructure. Unemployment is at 4.8%, he is sending back 11 million immigrants, there are skill-shortages already… where are all the people to fill these positions going to come from?
And he’s cutting hundreds of billions in taxes for th wealthy… so how is the government going to pay for it?
Ian said:
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
On the bright side, Australia hasn’t lost a wicket in 2 days.
diddly-squat said:
roffle..
Nice one
diddly-squat said:
roffle..!http://i.imgur.com/Oj0WwRL.jpg
I wonder what the Arabic says.
dv said:
Listening to Trump’s plans to employ millions of people to build infrastructure. Unemployment is at 4.8%, he is sending back 11 million immigrants, there are skill-shortages already… where are all the people to fill these positions going to come from?And he’s cutting hundreds of billions in taxes for th wealthy… so how is the government going to pay for it?
just put it on my tab…
Witty Rejoinder said:
diddly-squat said:
roffle..!http://i.imgur.com/Oj0WwRL.jpg
I wonder what the Arabic says.
Foolish Infidels Play into the Hands of Allah
dv said:
Listening to Trump’s plans to employ millions of people to build infrastructure. Unemployment is at 4.8%, he is sending back 11 million immigrants, there are skill-shortages already… where are all the people to fill these positions going to come from?And he’s cutting hundreds of billions in taxes for th wealthy… so how is the government going to pay for it?
runs away
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Listening to Trump’s plans to employ millions of people to build infrastructure. Unemployment is at 4.8%, he is sending back 11 million immigrants, there are skill-shortages already… where are all the people to fill these positions going to come from?And he’s cutting hundreds of billions in taxes for th wealthy… so how is the government going to pay for it?
May I introduce my friend the Laffer Curve…runs away
Given that America’s billionaires regularly pay 10-15% tax now I think that optimising their taxes will not involve cutting them
CrazyNeutrino said:
sibeen said:
Clinton has called Trump to concede.
So, she is in Shock. Thought so.
Me too, a bit
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
sibeen said:
Clinton has called Trump to concede.
So, she is in Shock. Thought so.
Me too, a bit
kinda like losing an eating contest to an anorexic
Probably going to end up 316-222 in the Electoral College in Trump’s favour, with Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.2% or so.
dv said:
Probably going to end up 316-222 in the Electoral College in Trump’s favour, with Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.2% or so.
:-\
Wikipedia has Trump winning the popular vote?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016
dv said:
Probably going to end up 316-222 in the Electoral College in Trump’s favour, with Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.2% or so.
They have this weird system where the winner can be the loser and vice versa.
Maybe later or tomorrow it might change.
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Probably going to end up 316-222 in the Electoral College in Trump’s favour, with Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.2% or so.:-\
Wikipedia has Trump winning the popular vote?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016
At the moment most of the California and Washington votes have not been counted but we can project what the final lead will be.
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
Probably going to end up 316-222 in the Electoral College in Trump’s favour, with Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.2% or so.They have this weird system where the winner can be the loser and vice versa.
Maybe later or tomorrow it might change.
:/
same can happen here…
CrazyNeutrino said:
They have this weird system where the winner can be the loser and vice versa.
Maybe later or tomorrow it might change.
The winning party can lose the popular vote in Oz too.
dv said:
At the moment most of the California and Washington votes have not been counted but we can project what the final lead will be.
Gotcha.
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
Probably going to end up 316-222 in the Electoral College in Trump’s favour, with Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.2% or so.They have this weird system where the winner can be the loser and vice versa.
Maybe later or tomorrow it might change.
Well it has happened before. Gore narrowly won the popular vote in 2000, and narrowly lost the Electoral college vote.
But this is looking like an Electoral college landslide to Trump so it is pretty stark.
diddly-squat said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
Probably going to end up 316-222 in the Electoral College in Trump’s favour, with Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.2% or so.They have this weird system where the winner can be the loser and vice versa.
Maybe later or tomorrow it might change.
:/
same can happen here…
Most recently in 1998.
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
Probably going to end up 316-222 in the Electoral College in Trump’s favour, with Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.2% or so.They have this weird system where the winner can be the loser and vice versa.
Maybe later or tomorrow it might change.
Well it has happened before. Gore narrowly won the popular vote in 2000, and narrowly lost the Electoral college vote.
But this is looking like an Electoral college landslide to Trump so it is pretty stark.
Nothing pretty about it.
I wonder what wunderkind Nate Silver will be doing for a living now … he got a stack of states wrong.
do we have numbers on how any didn’t vote?
Arts said:
do we have numbers on how any didn’t vote?
That’s what I’ve been wondering about. There have been suggestions that lots of disaffected white voters went out and voted for Trump.
Arts said:
do we have numbers on how any didn’t vote?
Record numbers did. Some say around 80%. Which exceeds 55%
Arts said:
do we have numbers on how any didn’t vote?
Looks like a record turn out of those that don’t normally vote, 15% compared to Obamas yes we can people at 9%.
roughbarked said:
Arts said:
do we have numbers on how any didn’t vote?
Record numbers did. Some say around 80%. Which exceeds 55%
Imagine if voters were able to change their vote after the election?
Arts said:
do we have numbers on how any didn’t vote?
many?
It’s been a high turnout election but we don’t have final numbers yet.
CrazyNeutrino said:
roughbarked said:
Arts said:
do we have numbers on how any didn’t vote?
Record numbers did. Some say around 80%. Which exceeds 55%
Imagine if voters were able to change their vote after the election?
Well they do have guns.
Good people in the Republican party who stood up to DJT are going to be marginalised now.
There’s not a lot of good news today but at least the Dems picked up some seats in the House and Senate.
dv said:
Good people in the Republican party who stood up to DJT are going to be marginalised now.There’s not a lot of good news today but at least the Dems picked up some seats in the House and Senate.
The Dems had no power when Obama was president, try as he might.
Let the fuckheads of the GOP find out how stupid they really are.

to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…
and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
Michelle woud be smart to start aligning herself to stand at the next election.
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…
He never expected to win. He thought he was on Saturday night live.
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
dv said:
Probably going to end up 316-222 in the Electoral College in Trump’s favour, with Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.2% or so.
That seems a huge difference, which for some reason no-one is even mentioning on the news reports I’ve seen this evening (admittedly, that’s only about 15 min. worth).
Still, I thought I thought our own dear leader responded very well in response to Leigh Sales’ somewhat inflammatory questioning.
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
He does? When? At his acceptance speech? I think that might be some wishful thinking there.
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared…
i was wondering if he would be like the dog that caught the car…
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
Whom did Michelob congratulate?
ChrispenEvan said:
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared…i was wondering if he would be like the dog that caught the car…
Nice ref, CE.
AwesomeO said:
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
He does? When? At his acceptance speech? I think that might be some wishful thinking there.
the vision they just showed on sky news.. when he came out clapping himself
roughbarked said:
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
Michelle woud be smart to start aligning herself to stand at the next election.
Better give it 8 years perhaps.
Just looked up her age, 52. I thought she was way younger than that. Even so 60’s not too bad to start a presidency.
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
Michelle woud be smart to start aligning herself to stand at the next election.
Better give it 8 years perhaps.
Just looked up her age, 52. I thought she was way younger than that. Even so 60’s not too bad to start a presidency.
female and black.. imagine Susan B Anthony’s gravestone at that election
Arts said:
AwesomeO said:
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
He does? When? At his acceptance speech? I think that might be some wishful thinking there.
the vision they just showed on sky news.. when he came out clapping himself
It will be on YouTube soon enough you can post the moments you say he looks scared.
CARL BIALIK 1:58 AM
I wrote this morning about this election’s status as the first since a Supreme Court decision struck down portions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, prompting states to close hundreds of polling places. Among the states affected were three crucial states won by Trump: Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina.
Arts said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:Michelle woud be smart to start aligning herself to stand at the next election.
Better give it 8 years perhaps.
Just looked up her age, 52. I thought she was way younger than that. Even so 60’s not too bad to start a presidency.
female and black.. imagine Susan B Anthony’s gravestone at that election
Had to look her up, but here’s a quote:
I beg you to speak of Woman as you do of the Negro, speak of her as a human being, as a citizen of the United States, as a half of the people in whose hands lies the destiny of this Nation.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Arts said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Better give it 8 years perhaps.
Just looked up her age, 52. I thought she was way younger than that. Even so 60’s not too bad to start a presidency.
female and black.. imagine Susan B Anthony’s gravestone at that election
Had to look her up, but here’s a quote:
I beg you to speak of Woman as you do of the Negro, speak of her as a human being, as a citizen of the United States, as a half of the people in whose hands lies the destiny of this Nation.
slavery in the US was abolished before women’s right to vote. But women’s rights to vote was well before African Americans rights to vote.
dv said:
CARL BIALIK 1:58 AM
I wrote this morning about this election’s status as the first since a Supreme Court decision struck down portions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, prompting states to close hundreds of polling places. Among the states affected were three crucial states won by Trump: Arizona, Georgia and North Carolina.
As Trump said, He knew it was rigged.
Arts said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Arts said:female and black.. imagine Susan B Anthony’s gravestone at that election
Had to look her up, but here’s a quote:
I beg you to speak of Woman as you do of the Negro, speak of her as a human being, as a citizen of the United States, as a half of the people in whose hands lies the destiny of this Nation.
slavery in the US was abolished before women’s right to vote. But women’s rights to vote was well before African Americans rights to vote.
I’d vote for Michelle and I think Americans will be starving for it before long.
AwesomeO said:
Arts said:
AwesomeO said:He does? When? At his acceptance speech? I think that might be some wishful thinking there.
the vision they just showed on sky news.. when he came out clapping himself
It will be on YouTube soon enough you can post the moments you say he looks scared.
I think he does. Not my job to convince you.
In fairness to the 538 people, their wide error bars (Brendon Brewer) meant that they ended up giving DJT a 29% chance of winning. It’s hardly amazing that something with a 29% chance actually happened. (Little bit surprised by some of the specifics e.g Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. ) Some of the other agencies such as Huffington Post’s Pollster should be a bit embarrassed about giving Clinton a 99% chance of victory.
Carl Bialik has said that this was not a huge polling miss, because at the end of the day Clinton’s vote lead might be 1% compared to the 3-4% the polls indicated. But for me this misses the point. There were several major statewide polling errors. The polls in Wisconsin were out by about 8%. The polls in Michigan, North Carolina and Minnesota were out by 5%
dv said:
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
Whom did Michelob congratulate?
bumping question
The Rev Dodgson said:
roughbarked said:
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
Michelle woud be smart to start aligning herself to stand at the next election.
Better give it 8 years perhaps.
Just looked up her age, 52. I thought she was way younger than that. Even so 60’s not too bad to start a presidency.
What Tony Abbot, Pauline, The_observer and the DT all need to realise is that we stopped needing four years to prove our point at least thirty to fifty years ago. Attempting to stop change is futile.
Arts said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Arts said:female and black.. imagine Susan B Anthony’s gravestone at that election
Had to look her up, but here’s a quote:
I beg you to speak of Woman as you do of the Negro, speak of her as a human being, as a citizen of the United States, as a half of the people in whose hands lies the destiny of this Nation.
slavery in the US was abolished before women’s right to vote. But women’s rights to vote was well before African Americans rights to vote.
You can thank the republicans for ending slavery and pretty sure for the female vote as well.
AwesomeO said:
Arts said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Had to look her up, but here’s a quote:
I beg you to speak of Woman as you do of the Negro, speak of her as a human being, as a citizen of the United States, as a half of the people in whose hands lies the destiny of this Nation.
slavery in the US was abolished before women’s right to vote. But women’s rights to vote was well before African Americans rights to vote.
You can thank the republicans for ending slavery and pretty sure for the female vote as well.
Hopefully, that part of the party will temper trump.
dv said:
dv said:
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
Whom did Michelob congratulate?
bumping question
it was a throwaway
Arts said:
dv said:
dv said:Whom did Michelob congratulate?
bumping question
it was a throwaway
She’ll be forced into it anyway unless she can show thtat she doesn’t have to.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/first-dog-on-the-moon-on-president-trump-not-a-typo
It’s very disappointing. There were a lot of very good policy’s riding on this, that would have made life better for tens of millions of people and set the US up to begin alleviating poverty.
geeez SM.
:-)
Arts said:
to be fair, Trump looks scared. I expected him to look like the cat that got the cream, but he looks positively frightened at the prospect that he now has to work for others as opposed to working for himself… it’s not like a TV show where he can fire the whole country…and Michelle Obama’s congratulatory kiss was more forced than I expected.. I’ve never seen her so rattled
I heard only the audio as I was driving home from archery. I thought he was having a bit of an “Oh shit!” moment from his tone.
But I still feel sick.
ChrispenEvan said:
geeez SM.:-)
It isn’t my fault.
None of this is my fault.
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
Probably going to end up 316-222 in the Electoral College in Trump’s favour, with Clinton winning the popular vote by 1.2% or so.They have this weird system where the winner can be the loser and vice versa.
Maybe later or tomorrow it might change.
Well it has happened before. Gore narrowly won the popular vote in 2000, and narrowly lost the Electoral college vote.
But this is looking like an Electoral college landslide to Trump so it is pretty stark.
Clinton, the one who won, received something like 42% of the popular vote in his first election.
dv said:
It’s very disappointing. There were a lot of very good policy’s riding on this, that would have made life better for tens of millions of people and set the US up to begin alleviating poverty.
one step forward, fifty back.
sarahs mum said:
You were born with the talent.
ChrispenEvan said:
geeez SM.:-)
It isn’t my fault.
None of this is my fault.
Well, it looks like the Trans-Pacific Partnership is off, which may not be an entirely bad thing.
US companies were getting geared up to put pressure on ‘partner’ countries like Australia to fall into line with US ideas on the patents for medicines/ drugs, and copyrights etc.
As i said the other night, America can build its walls, kick out the scapegoats, and bar any new ones from arriving.
When they’ve done that, and they find themselves alone in their bastion, they may observe that their problems are still there with them – and so are the causes.
sibeen said:
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:They have this weird system where the winner can be the loser and vice versa.
Maybe later or tomorrow it might change.
Well it has happened before. Gore narrowly won the popular vote in 2000, and narrowly lost the Electoral college vote.
But this is looking like an Electoral college landslide to Trump so it is pretty stark.
Clinton, the one who won, received something like 42% of the popular vote in his first election.
Nnnnope. Clinton WON the popular vote race by 6%, beating Bush who got 37%
According to the Gran:
Protests against Trump have broken out in cities across the US, including marches in Oakland, Los Angeles, Portland and New York City.
At the University of California, Los Angeles, there are reports of hundreds of students gathering:
No, no, no, that cannot be right. It is only those whackjob tea party dickheads who would protest the result of a democratic election.
sibeen said:
According to the Gran:Protests against Trump have broken out in cities across the US, including marches in Oakland, Los Angeles, Portland and New York City.
At the University of California, Los Angeles, there are reports of hundreds of students gathering:
No, no, no, that cannot be right. It is only those whackjob tea party dickheads who would protest the result of a democratic election.
it was the whack-jobs that gave them the head’s up that the whole thing was rigged.
mcgoon said:
Well, it looks like the Trans-Pacific Partnership is off, which may not be an entirely bad thing.US companies were getting geared up to put pressure on ‘partner’ countries like Australia to fall into line with US ideas on the patents for medicines/ drugs, and copyrights etc.
As i said the other night, America can build its walls, kick out the scapegoats, and bar any new ones from arriving.
When they’ve done that, and they find themselves alone in their bastion, they may observe that their problems are still there with them – and so are the causes.
El Chapo will still have his tunnels.
ChrispenEvan said:
sibeen said:
According to the Gran:Protests against Trump have broken out in cities across the US, including marches in Oakland, Los Angeles, Portland and New York City.
At the University of California, Los Angeles, there are reports of hundreds of students gathering:
No, no, no, that cannot be right. It is only those whackjob tea party dickheads who would protest the result of a democratic election.
it was the whack-jobs that gave them the head’s up that the whole thing was rigged.
You trumped me. I was going to say that.
roughbarked said:
mcgoon said:
Well, it looks like the Trans-Pacific Partnership is off, which may not be an entirely bad thing.US companies were getting geared up to put pressure on ‘partner’ countries like Australia to fall into line with US ideas on the patents for medicines/ drugs, and copyrights etc.
As i said the other night, America can build its walls, kick out the scapegoats, and bar any new ones from arriving.
When they’ve done that, and they find themselves alone in their bastion, they may observe that their problems are still there with them – and so are the causes.
El Chapo will still have his tunnels.
He probably has one going to Mars.
CrazyNeutrino said:
roughbarked said:
mcgoon said:
Well, it looks like the Trans-Pacific Partnership is off, which may not be an entirely bad thing.US companies were getting geared up to put pressure on ‘partner’ countries like Australia to fall into line with US ideas on the patents for medicines/ drugs, and copyrights etc.
As i said the other night, America can build its walls, kick out the scapegoats, and bar any new ones from arriving.
When they’ve done that, and they find themselves alone in their bastion, they may observe that their problems are still there with them – and so are the causes.
El Chapo will still have his tunnels.
He probably has one going to Mars.
Hey El Chapo had that tunnel built pretty quickly so maybe he can organise the wall
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
roughbarked said:El Chapo will still have his tunnels.
He probably has one going to Mars.
Hey El Chapo had that tunnel built pretty quickly so maybe he can organise the wall
He probably already has a tunnel under the wall.
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:He probably has one going to Mars.
Hey El Chapo had that tunnel built pretty quickly so maybe he can organise the wall
He probably already has a tunnel under the wall.
and seeing that the wall is not built yet, then that is impressive.
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:He probably has one going to Mars.
Hey El Chapo had that tunnel built pretty quickly so maybe he can organise the wall
He probably already has a tunnel under the wall.
omnipresience.
Will this link work?
https://www.facebook.com/CrackedNSpineless/?hc_ref=PAGES_TIMELINE&fref=nf
My sister in California likes the dolphin reference.
buffy said:
Will this link work?
https://www.facebook.com/CrackedNSpineless/?hc_ref=PAGES_TIMELINE&fref=nf
My sister in California likes the dolphin reference.
It shows the front page of the Cracked And Spineless New And Used Books Facebook page
“Houston we have a problem”
dv said:
buffy said:Will this link work?
https://www.facebook.com/CrackedNSpineless/?hc_ref=PAGES_TIMELINE&fref=nf
My sister in California likes the dolphin reference.
It shows the front page of the Cracked And Spineless New And Used Books Facebook page
Yep, that is what you are after. The comment and the dolphin gif.
i got it buffy.
https://www.facebook.com/uniladmag/videos/vb.146505212039213/2446844548671923/?type=2&theater¬if_t=live_video_interaction¬if_id=1478685763987880
I couldn’t pay attention to Trump’s victory (ARGHHHH!!!) speech – coz I was watching his son Barron try not to fall asleep standing up.
Brindabellas said:
I couldn’t pay attention to Trump’s victory (ARGHHHH!!!) speech – coz I was watching his son Barron try not to fall asleep standing up.
Let us hope he is barren.
dv said:
sibeen said:
dv said:Well it has happened before. Gore narrowly won the popular vote in 2000, and narrowly lost the Electoral college vote.
But this is looking like an Electoral college landslide to Trump so it is pretty stark.
Clinton, the one who won, received something like 42% of the popular vote in his first election.
Nnnnope. Clinton WON the popular vote race by 6%, beating Bush who got 37%
Just back from cooking dinner. SWMBO out for the evening, so the sprogs and I are having fish fingers, eggs and grilled tomato – they love it.
Yes, I was taking the piss, but it does show that the popular vote really means SFA.
roughbarked said:
Brindabellas said:
I couldn’t pay attention to Trump’s victory (ARGHHHH!!!) speech – coz I was watching his son Barron try not to fall asleep standing up.
Let us hope he is barren.
If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:Clinton, the one who won, received something like 42% of the popular vote in his first election.
Nnnnope. Clinton WON the popular vote race by 6%, beating Bush who got 37%
Just back from cooking dinner. SWMBO out for the evening, so the sprogs and I are having fish fingers, eggs and grilled tomato – they love it.
Yes, I was taking the piss, but it does show that the popular vote really means SFA.
Assott actually got to be calle Prime Minister for a while. so, yeah.
Brindabellas said:
I couldn’t pay attention to Trump’s victory (ARGHHHH!!!) speech – coz I was watching his son Barron try not to fall asleep standing up.
(I was thinking of the Omen.)
sibeen said:
roughbarked said:
Brindabellas said:
I couldn’t pay attention to Trump’s victory (ARGHHHH!!!) speech – coz I was watching his son Barron try not to fall asleep standing up.
Let us hope he is barren.
If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
sibeen said:
If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
And Roughy is usually so sensible.
sarahs mum said:
Brindabellas said:
I couldn’t pay attention to Trump’s victory (ARGHHHH!!!) speech – coz I was watching his son Barron try not to fall asleep standing up.
(I was thinking of the Omen.)
Has Trump been on psychic TV?
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
And Roughy is usually so sensible.
mostly but today can be considered an exception.
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:Clinton, the one who won, received something like 42% of the popular vote in his first election.
Nnnnope. Clinton WON the popular vote race by 6%, beating Bush who got 37%
Just back from cooking dinner. SWMBO out for the evening, so the sprogs and I are having fish fingers, eggs and grilled tomato – they love it.
Yes, I was taking the piss, but it does show that the popular vote really means SFA.
No it kind of doesn’t … Clinton won the popular vote by a shitload, and won the electoral college vote by a shitload, so the Clinton 1992 result is a case of the popular vote being reflected in the result.
The only two instances of an EV and popular vote mismatch since the 1800s have been Bush 2000 and Trump 2016 (probably).
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
And Roughy is usually so sensible.
I actually clicked on his post accidentally :)
roughbarked said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
And Roughy is usually so sensible.
mostly but today can be considered an exception.
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
And Roughy is usually so sensible.
I actually clicked on his post accidentally :)
sibeen said:
roughbarked said:
Brindabellas said:
I couldn’t pay attention to Trump’s victory (ARGHHHH!!!) speech – coz I was watching his son Barron try not to fall asleep standing up.
Let us hope he is barren.
If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
i like how the right has become emboldened and are actually faking a conscience.
ChrispenEvan said:
sibeen said:
roughbarked said:Let us hope he is barren.
If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
i like how the right has become emboldened and are actually faking a conscience.
oh and ;-). as if you couldn’t guess.
:-)
ChrispenEvan said:
i like how the right has become emboldened and are actually faking a conscience.
Sibeen only pretends to be right-wing. In actuality he is a pinko-lefty CUB boycotting softie.
ChrispenEvan said:
ChrispenEvan said:
sibeen said:If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
i like how the right has become emboldened and are actually faking a conscience.
oh and ;-). as if you couldn’t guess.
:-)
:)
ChrispenEvan said:
sibeen said:
roughbarked said:Let us hope he is barren.
If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
i like how the right has become emboldened and are actually faking a conscience.
What has the right got to do with it? I was supporting Clinton and as far as I know have never given any indication otherwise. I just happen to believe what is considered bad form by one side should also be considered bad form by the other. If someone had made a dispariging comment about one of the Obama children in all likelihood someone would have spoken up.
more dollars than sense
Jesus … this means that the fkn arseholes in the Senate have been rewarded for their decision to hold off on appointing a SC justice.
That’s one of the worst things about all this. Terrible behaviour has been rewarded.
sibeen said:
ChrispenEvan said:
sibeen said:If someone stated the same about one of Obama’s kids the howls of outrage would be legion.
i like how the right has become emboldened and are actually faking a conscience.
What has the right got to do with it? I was supporting Clinton and as far as I know have never given any indication otherwise. I just happen to believe what is considered bad form by one side should also be considered bad form by the other. If someone had made a dispariging comment about one of the Obama children in all likelihood someone would have spoken up.
and I did. No way would I suggest thtat of any of Obama’s line unless they themselves proved themselves unworthy. It is the unworthiness that I was pointing at.
dv said:
Jesus … this means that the fkn arseholes in the Senate have been rewarded for their decision to hold off on appointing a SC justice.That’s one of the worst things about all this. Terrible behaviour has been rewarded.
It is the American way.
https://www.facebook.com/PaulineHansonAu/videos/536633229874327/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED
sarahs mum said:
https://www.facebook.com/PaulineHansonAu/videos/536633229874327/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED
Even if I wasn’t shepherding my remaining bandwidth.. Nah.
sarahs mum said:
https://www.facebook.com/PaulineHansonAu/videos/536633229874327/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED
got rid of that rubbish that is climate change.
sarahs mum said:
Brindabellas said:
I couldn’t pay attention to Trump’s victory (ARGHHHH!!!) speech – coz I was watching his son Barron try not to fall asleep standing up.
(I was thinking of the Omen.)
Yes!….scary. But I do feel sorry for him. no matter what he does in the future, there will always be a clip of him struggling to stay awake on the world stage.
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
https://www.facebook.com/PaulineHansonAu/videos/536633229874327/?hc_ref=NEWSFEED
got rid of that rubbish that is climate change.
My prediction is that human rights will severely suffer as well. Refugees for example will lose any they thought they may have.
Brindabellas said:
But I do feel sorry for him
There are a few tens of millions of people I feel sorry for tonight and the sleepy prince is not among them.
Brindabellas said:
sarahs mum said:
Brindabellas said:
I couldn’t pay attention to Trump’s victory (ARGHHHH!!!) speech – coz I was watching his son Barron try not to fall asleep standing up.
(I was thinking of the Omen.)
Yes!….scary. But I do feel sorry for him. no matter what he does in the future, there will always be a clip of him struggling to stay awake on the world stage.
Exactly. A 10 year old who has been up all day in the most exciting day of his life, it’s 2AM, and some people are having a go at him for appearing sleepy.
dv said:
Brindabellas said:But I do feel sorry for him
There are a few tens of millions of people I feel sorry for tonight and the sleepy prince is not among them.
Each for our own. Be smart, survive this. The future needs us and our descendants.
sibeen said:
Brindabellas said:
sarahs mum said:(I was thinking of the Omen.)
Yes!….scary. But I do feel sorry for him. no matter what he does in the future, there will always be a clip of him struggling to stay awake on the world stage.
I wasn’t having a go at him. I was feeling sorry for the poor kid (on so many levels).Exactly. A 10 year old who has been up all day in the most exciting day of his life, it’s 2AM, and some people are having a go at him for appearing sleepy.
sibeen said:
Brindabellas said:
sarahs mum said:(I was thinking of the Omen.)
Yes!….scary. But I do feel sorry for him. no matter what he does in the future, there will always be a clip of him struggling to stay awake on the world stage.
Exactly. A 10 year old who has been up all day in the most exciting day of his life, it’s 2AM, and some people are having a go at him for appearing sleepy.
Yes, that’s the big story today
sibeen said:
Brindabellas said:
sarahs mum said:(I was thinking of the Omen.)
Yes!….scary. But I do feel sorry for him. no matter what he does in the future, there will always be a clip of him struggling to stay awake on the world stage.
Exactly. A 10 year old who has been up all day in the most exciting day of his life, it’s 2AM, and some people are having a go at him for appearing sleepy.
I didn’t. ;)
ChrispenEvan said:
i got it buffy.
Thank you, I didn’t think it was all that obscure. Pertinent though.
buffy said:
ChrispenEvan said:
i got it buffy.
Thank you, I didn’t think it was all that obscure. Pertinent though.
That it was.
dv said:
sibeen said:
Brindabellas said:Yes!….scary. But I do feel sorry for him. no matter what he does in the future, there will always be a clip of him struggling to stay awake on the world stage.
Exactly. A 10 year old who has been up all day in the most exciting day of his life, it’s 2AM, and some people are having a go at him for appearing sleepy.
Yes, that’s the big story today
No, it isn’t; but I do feel I can multitask and defend the poor sprog whilst also feeling downcast about the actual election result.
you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:Exactly. A 10 year old who has been up all day in the most exciting day of his life, it’s 2AM, and some people are having a go at him for appearing sleepy.
Yes, that’s the big story today
No, it isn’t; but I do feel I can multitask and defend the poor sprog whilst also feeling downcast about the actual election result.
To be honest, if I hadn’t read it here, the poor sprog wouldn’t even have impinged upon my peripheral vision.
diddly-squat said:
you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
Fuck man, they already have. No man is an island.
diddly-squat said:
you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
You are a confident man.
diddly-squat said:
you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
DV is probably not just thinking of himself…
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:Exactly. A 10 year old who has been up all day in the most exciting day of his life, it’s 2AM, and some people are having a go at him for appearing sleepy.
Yes, that’s the big story today
No, it isn’t; but I do feel I can multitask and defend the poor sprog whilst also feeling downcast about the actual election result.
all that multitasking… I’ve always thought you might be a woman just pretending to be middle aged man…
ChrispenEvan said:
diddly-squat said:you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
DV is probably not just thinking of himself…
Compassion is a gift.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
Fuck man, they already have. No man is an island.
how have they changed? have your stocks gone down or something??
dv said:
diddly-squat said:you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
Fuck man, they already have. No man is an island.
I am a rock.
diddly-squat said:
sibeen said:
dv said:Yes, that’s the big story today
No, it isn’t; but I do feel I can multitask and defend the poor sprog whilst also feeling downcast about the actual election result.
all that multitasking… I’ve always thought you might be a woman just pretending to be middle aged man…
So.. it is misogynist’s day?
sibeen said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
Fuck man, they already have. No man is an island.
I am a rock.
dates you a bit.
sibeen said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
Fuck man, they already have. No man is an island.
I am a rock.
I prefer to call you Dwayne
diddly-squat said:
you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
He’ll be able to write some more disgruntled articles for ‘The Daily Worker’.
Also come on, it’s pretty galling for someone with no relevant abilities to get an important position over someone 100 times more qualified.
dv said:
sibeen said:
dv said:Fuck man, they already have. No man is an island.
I am a rock.
I am an island
Witty Rejoinder said:
diddly-squat said:you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
He’ll be able to write some more disgruntled articles for ‘The Daily Worker’.
The Daily Worker is probably saying “See, we should have gone for Sanders”…
Witty Rejoinder said:
diddly-squat said:you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
He’ll be able to write some more disgruntled articles for ‘The Daily Worker’.
Your rejoinders aren’t always as witty for the occasion.
Brindabellas said:
dv said:
sibeen said:
dv said:Fuck man, they already have. No man is an island.
I am a rock.
I am an island
I am a dwarf planet.
dv said:
Also come on, it’s pretty galling for someone with no relevant abilities to get an important position over someone 100 times more qualified.
You have to admit that America needed to put someone like Trump up against Hillary.
ChrispenEvan said:
Brindabellas said:
dv said:I am a rock.
I am an island
I am a dwarf planet.
That’s big of you.
dv said:
Also come on, it’s pretty galling for someone with no relevant abilities to get an important position over someone 100 times more qualified.
there’s a reason you don’t make your best operator a supervisor…
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-09/mexico-peso-sinks-to-life-lows-as-trump-wins-us-presidency/8010764
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
Also come on, it’s pretty galling for someone with no relevant abilities to get an important position over someone 100 times more qualified.
there’s a reason you don’t make your best operator a supervisor…
I can think of hundreds.
buffy said:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-09/mexico-peso-sinks-to-life-lows-as-trump-wins-us-presidency/8010764
Hmm. wait until the tunnels are all built.
This has been a pretty hilarious year in global politics, it certiantly Trumps other years…
roughbarked said:
buffy said:http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-09/mexico-peso-sinks-to-life-lows-as-trump-wins-us-presidency/8010764
Hmm. wait until the tunnels are all built.
Trump would be advised to follow the no boats route. discourage the criminal element by making it not worth their while. Legalise the drugs. Have governemnt control the drugs.. big revenue, certain outcomes.
diddly-squat said:
This has been a pretty hilarious year in global politics, it certiantly Trumps other years…
hah.
apparently Michael Moore picked it.
http://michaelmoore.com/trumpwillwin/
I’m still processing this but it does seem that this is bugging me on multiple levels that I am still discovering.
1/ There was a massive opportunity for progress in the US because the Democrats had a remarkably progressive platform for once: a path to universal healthcare, financial support for education, basic gun control, livable minimum wage. It was an exciting prospect for a big nation. It’s a bit opportunity squandered. Instead, quite probably the Affordable Care Act will be dismantled.
2/ Terrible behaviour has been rewarded: Trump has been rewarded for being abusive and dishonest and spewing bigoted rhetoric. The Senate Republicans have been rewarded for sitting on their hands rather than interviewing supreme court nominees.
3/ Good behaviour is going to be punished. Brave Republicans who stood up to Trump are going to be marginalised.
4/ A good, experienced candidate has been beaten by a terrible, ignorant candidate who showed no signs of learning the basics of the job he was going for.
5/ Trump has indicated he will appoint Supreme Court justices who will overturn abortion rights, oppose basic gun control, and remove restrictions on private political campaign financing. These people could be on the SC for decades. Even if he only lasts four years, it is very likely that another SCJ will die in that period.
6/ Exactly how fucking bad does a male candidate need to be to lose to a female candidate in the USA?
I mean this is quite apart from anything that I think about him as a person (unscrupulous, cruel, selifsh, hyperentitled) or his tied with Putin etc.
Ah well, the USA will soon know what it is like to elect a leader with racist, sexist, elitist, religious attitudes, just like we did 3 years ago.
At least we have a system where the leader only survived for 2 years.
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:you seem angry dv… I promise you that things won’t change for you in any appreciable way…
Fuck man, they already have. No man is an island.
how have they changed? have your stocks gone down or something??
Um, well yes but that’s not what I am referring to.
I want to see a developed, peaceful, happy world.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:Fuck man, they already have. No man is an island.
how have they changed? have your stocks gone down or something??
Um, well yes but that’s not what I am referring to.
I want to see a developed, peaceful, happy world.
I know.. I guess I’m just not as surprised as you are… I think it’s essentially the worst thing the US could possibly do… yet here we are…
dv said:
I’m still processing this but it does seem that this is bugging me on multiple levels that I am still discovering.1/ There was a massive opportunity for progress in the US because the Democrats had a remarkably progressive platform for once: a path to universal healthcare, financial support for education, basic gun control, livable minimum wage. It was an exciting prospect for a big nation. It’s a bit opportunity squandered. Instead, quite probably the Affordable Care Act will be dismantled.
2/ Terrible behaviour has been rewarded: Trump has been rewarded for being abusive and dishonest and spewing bigoted rhetoric. The Senate Republicans have been rewarded for sitting on their hands rather than interviewing supreme court nominees.
3/ Good behaviour is going to be punished. Brave Republicans who stood up to Trump are going to be marginalised.
4/ A good, experienced candidate has been beaten by a terrible, ignorant candidate who showed no signs of learning the basics of the job he was going for.
5/ Trump has indicated he will appoint Supreme Court justices who will overturn abortion rights, oppose basic gun control, and remove restrictions on private political campaign financing. These people could be on the SC for decades. Even if he only lasts four years, it is very likely that another SCJ will die in that period.
6/ Exactly how fucking bad does a male candidate need to be to lose to a female candidate in the USA?
I mean this is quite apart from anything that I think about him as a person (unscrupulous, cruel, selifsh, hyperentitled) or his tied with Putin etc.
I sympathise but what can you and I do? I mean that I have been doing the same all my life.
sarahs mum said:
apparently Michael Moore picked it.http://michaelmoore.com/trumpwillwin/
This first reason he has seems to encapsulate it all. He really was a bit of a Cassandra with this:
Midwest Math, or Welcome to Our Rust Belt Brexit. I believe Trump is going to focus much of his attention on the four blue states in the rustbelt of the upper Great Lakes – Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Four traditionally Democratic states – but each of them have elected a Republican governor since 2010 (only Pennsylvania has now finally elected a Democrat). In the Michigan primary in March, more Michiganders came out to vote for the Republicans (1.32 million) that the Democrats (1.19 million). Trump is ahead of Hillary in the latest polls in Pennsylvania and tied with her in Ohio. Tied? How can the race be this close after everything Trump has said and done? Well maybe it’s because he’s said (correctly) that the Clintons’ support of NAFTA helped to destroy the industrial states of the Upper Midwest. Trump is going to hammer Clinton on this and her support of TPP and other trade policies that have royally screwed the people of these four states. When Trump stood in the shadow of a Ford Motor factory during the Michigan primary, he threatened the corporation that if they did indeed go ahead with their planned closure of that factory and move it to Mexico, he would slap a 35% tariff on any Mexican-built cars shipped back to the United States. It was sweet, sweet music to the ears of the working class of Michigan, and when he tossed in his threat to Apple that he would force them to stop making their iPhones in China and build them here in America, well, hearts swooned and Trump walked away with a big victory that should have gone to the governor next-door, John Kasich.
From Green Bay to Pittsburgh, this, my friends, is the middle of England – broken, depressed, struggling, the smokestacks strewn across the countryside with the carcass of what we use to call the Middle Class. Angry, embittered working (and nonworking) people who were lied to by the trickle-down of Reagan and abandoned by Democrats who still try to talk a good line but are really just looking forward to rub one out with a lobbyist from Goldman Sachs who’ll write them nice big check before leaving the room. What happened in the UK with Brexit is going to happen here. Elmer Gantry shows up looking like Boris Johnson and just says whatever shit he can make up to convince the masses that this is their chance! To stick to ALL of them, all who wrecked their American Dream! And now The Outsider, Donald Trump, has arrived to clean house! You don’t have to agree with him! You don’t even have to like him! He is your personal Molotov cocktail to throw right into the center of the bastards who did this to you! SEND A MESSAGE! TRUMP IS YOUR MESSENGER!
And this is where the math comes in. In 2012, Mitt Romney lost by 64 electoral votes. Add up the electoral votes cast by Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. It’s 64. All Trump needs to do to win is to carry, as he’s expected to do, the swath of traditional red states from Idaho to Georgia (states that’ll never vote for Hillary Clinton), and then he just needs these four rust belt states. He doesn’t need Florida. He doesn’t need Colorado or Virginia. Just Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. And that will put him over the top. This is how it will happen in November.
tauto said:
Ah well, the USA will soon know what it is like to elect a leader with racist, sexist, elitist, religious attitudes, just like we did 3 years ago.
At least we have a system where the leader only survived for 2 years.
There are ways Trump can shoot himself in the foot. We may be surprised to lrearn that he already showed all of that and still got elected but he’s a veritable vault of that stuff. Then there is the fact that the republicans may have wanted victory but they believe they may be able to temper the Trump card.
I for one, welcome our new orange overlords….
Stumpy_seahorse said:
I for one, welcome our new orange overlords….
Droppy had the best joke of the day, although he probably pinched it:
Orange is the new black :)
Stumpy_seahorse said:
I for one, welcome our new orange overlords….
:-) Orange is the new Black
sibeen said:
Stumpy_seahorse said:
I for one, welcome our new orange overlords….
Droppy had the best joke of the day, although he probably pinched it:
Orange is the new black :)
*like
sibeen said:
Stumpy_seahorse said:
I for one, welcome our new orange overlords….
Droppy had the best joke of the day, although he probably pinched it:
Orange is the new black :)
Damn – missed it by that much
sibeen said:
sarahs mum said:
apparently Michael Moore picked it.http://michaelmoore.com/trumpwillwin/
This first reason he has seems to encapsulate it all. He really was a bit of a Cassandra with this:
Trump took that as direction.
Brindabellas said:
sibeen said:
Stumpy_seahorse said:
I for one, welcome our new orange overlords….
Droppy had the best joke of the day, although he probably pinched it:
Orange is the new black :)
Damn – missed it by that much
Way too slow, woman; get to the back of the line.
:)
sibeen said:
Stumpy_seahorse said:
I for one, welcome our new orange overlords….
Droppy had the best joke of the day, although he probably pinched it:
Orange is the new black :)
yep… that joke certainly Trumps the rest
As an aside last time Ohio voted for Obama, so I guess they were not always ignorant red neck racist morons.
AwesomeO said:
As an aside last time Ohio voted for Obama, so I guess they were not always ignorant red neck racist morons.
point well made.
roughbarked said:
AwesomeO said:
As an aside last time Ohio voted for Obama, so I guess they were not always ignorant red neck racist morons.
point well made.
The thing is though, the art of snake oil salesmanship still exists in these necks of the woods.
All this was below Hilary’s stature.
AwesomeO said:
As an aside last time Ohio voted for Obama, so I guess they were not always ignorant red neck racist morons.
So did Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, North Carolina and Florida.
Bastards.
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:
As an aside last time Ohio voted for Obama, so I guess they were not always ignorant red neck racist morons.
So did Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, North Carolina and Florida.
Bastards.
As you see, that’s why I’m pumping for Michelle Obama. They needed a black woman to make it right.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo
That’s going to be embarrassing for quite a while.
roughbarked said:
As you see, that’s why I’m pumping for Michelle Obama. They needed a black woman to make it right.
Vote 1 Condoleezza!
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:As you see, that’s why I’m pumping for Michelle Obama. They needed a black woman to make it right.
Vote 1 Condoleezza!
A black woman would definitely have shown that it was all no trumps.
sibeen said:
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromoThat’s going to be embarrassing for quite a while.
a few forecasters looking for a job tomorrow
and the jokes have started
An airplane was about to crash. There were 4 passengers on board, but only 3 parachutes.
The 1st passenger said, “I am Steph Curry, the best NBA basketball player. The Warriors and my millions of fans need me, and I can’t afford to die.” So he took the 1st pack and left the plane.
The 2nd passenger, Donald Trump, said, “I am the newly-elected U.S. President, and I am the smartest President in American history, so my people don’t want me to die.” He took the 2nd pack and jumped out of the plane.
The 3rd passenger, the Pope, said to the 4th passenger, a 10 year old schoolboy, “My son, I am old and don’t have many years left, you have more years ahead so I will sacrifice my life and let you have the last parachute.”
The little boy said, “That’s okay, Your Holiness, there’s a parachute left for you. America ‘s smartest President took my schoolbag.”
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:As you see, that’s why I’m pumping for Michelle Obama. They needed a black woman to make it right.
Vote 1 Condoleezza!
I suspect the chances of Michelle ever getting a look in took a complete nosedive today, and that’s a good thing. Why anyone thinks it’s a great idea to have family dynasties running off against each other in a democracy is way beyond my ken. Bad enough that we had the Bush vs Clinton cabal, without adding a third family into the mix. London to a brick some morons will be suggesting Chelsea Clinton to run in four years time.
Arts said:
and the jokes have startedAn airplane was about to crash. There were 4 passengers on board, but only 3 parachutes.
The 1st passenger said, “I am Steph Curry, the best NBA basketball player. The Warriors and my millions of fans need me, and I can’t afford to die.” So he took the 1st pack and left the plane.
The 2nd passenger, Donald Trump, said, “I am the newly-elected U.S. President, and I am the smartest President in American history, so my people don’t want me to die.” He took the 2nd pack and jumped out of the plane.
The 3rd passenger, the Pope, said to the 4th passenger, a 10 year old schoolboy, “My son, I am old and don’t have many years left, you have more years ahead so I will sacrifice my life and let you have the last parachute.”
The little boy said, “That’s okay, Your Holiness, there’s a parachute left for you. America ‘s smartest President took my schoolbag.”
I’m chuckling.
keep them coming.
I’m just upset that we still don’t have two presidents that have slept together
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
roughbarked said:As you see, that’s why I’m pumping for Michelle Obama. They needed a black woman to make it right.
Vote 1 Condoleezza!
I suspect the chances of Michelle ever getting a look in took a complete nosedive today, and that’s a good thing. Why anyone thinks it’s a great idea to have family dynasties running off against each other in a democracy is way beyond my ken. Bad enough that we had the Bush vs Clinton cabal, without adding a third family into the mix. London to a brick some morons will be suggesting Chelsea Clinton to run in four years time.
I’m with you here..
BArts said:
I’m just upset that we still don’t have two presidents that have slept together
What about the bushs?…
Stumpy_seahorse said:
BArts said:
I’m just upset that we still don’t have two presidents that have slept together
What about the bushs?…
that we know of…
sarahs mum said:
sibeen said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Vote 1 Condoleezza!
I suspect the chances of Michelle ever getting a look in took a complete nosedive today, and that’s a good thing. Why anyone thinks it’s a great idea to have family dynasties running off against each other in a democracy is way beyond my ken. Bad enough that we had the Bush vs Clinton cabal, without adding a third family into the mix. London to a brick some morons will be suggesting Chelsea Clinton to run in four years time.
I’m with you here..
Except, he left out the Kennedy’s.
Arts said:
I’m just upset that we still don’t have two presidents that have slept together
Come on you can’t tell me Lincoln and Fillmore weren’t fucking
CARL BIALIK 1:31 AM
We’ll never know exactly how much FBI Director James Comey’s letter to Congress on Oct. 28 about new emails in the Clinton investigation hurt her chances of winning the presidency or Democrats’ chances of winning the Senate. But we do know that her lead in polls fell by about 3 percentage points after the letter — and Democrats likely won’t soon forget that.
dv said:
CARL BIALIK 1:31 AM
We’ll never know exactly how much FBI Director James Comey’s letter to Congress on Oct. 28 about new emails in the Clinton investigation hurt her chances of winning the presidency or Democrats’ chances of winning the Senate. But we do know that her lead in polls fell by about 3 percentage points after the letter — and Democrats likely won’t soon forget that.
And i thought the machine was behind Hillary until then..
dv said:
Arts said:
I’m just upset that we still don’t have two presidents that have slept together
Come on you can’t tell me Lincoln and Fillmore weren’t fucking
no I can’t…
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
NY Times: Final exit polls
Poor and lower middle class voters overwhelmingly voted for Clinton over Trump (by a 12% and 9% margin respectively).
Wealthier voters mostly voted for Trump.

dv said:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
NY Times: Final exit pollsPoor and lower middle class voters overwhelmingly voted for Clinton over Trump (by a 12% and 9% margin respectively).
Wealthier voters mostly voted for Trump.
Money speaks many false tongues.
roughbarked said:
Money speaks many false tongues.
Also … 9% of registered Democrats voted for Trump. Fuck those people.
dv said:
roughbarked said:Money speaks many false tongues.
Also … 9% of registered Democrats voted for Trump. Fuck those people.
…and 7% of Republicans voted for Clinton. Fuck those people…no…wait.
dv said:
roughbarked said:Money speaks many false tongues.
Also … 9% of registered Democrats voted for Trump. Fuck those people.
They’ve already started calling them the Trump Democrats.
dv said:
roughbarked said:Money speaks many false tongues.
Also … 9% of registered Democrats voted for Trump. Fuck those people.
It was their money they were thinking of.
sibeen said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:Money speaks many false tongues.
Also … 9% of registered Democrats voted for Trump. Fuck those people.
…and 7% of Republicans voted for Clinton. Fuck those people…no…wait.
7 percent had pause for discernment?
sibeen said:
dv said:
roughbarked said:Money speaks many false tongues.
Also … 9% of registered Democrats voted for Trump. Fuck those people.
…and 7% of Republicans voted for Clinton. Fuck those people…no…wait.
No … cherish those people.
There’s no symmetry here. One candidate was okay.
from my quick poll, people were voting for what they thought were the ‘lesser of two evils’ so not entirely chuffed with trump, but less chuffed with Hills…
Arts said:
from my quick poll, people were voting for what they thought were the ‘lesser of two evils’ so not entirely chuffed with trump, but less chuffed with Hills…
I can grok this easily. Though I’d have opted for any other candiates.
dv said:
roughbarked said:Money speaks many false tongues.
Also … 9% of registered Democrats voted for Trump. Fuck those people.
—-
slow down sunshine, 9% of young voters voted for a third candidate, without realising the futility of their protest vote.
roughbarked said:
Arts said:
from my quick poll, people were voting for what they thought were the ‘lesser of two evils’ so not entirely chuffed with trump, but less chuffed with Hills…
I can grok this easily. Though I’d have opted for any other candiates.
As to this, I’d likely have preferred to vote for any other candidate and since the only one was Bernie Sanders, my vote wouldn’t have counted and therefore I’d have been torn between the decision that my vote didn’t matter unless I didn’t register it or not.
roughbarked said:
Arts said:
from my quick poll, people were voting for what they thought were the ‘lesser of two evils’ so not entirely chuffed with trump, but less chuffed with Hills…
I can grok this easily. Though I’d have opted for any other candiates.
Yes I’m sure the “Don’t Blame Me, I Voted For Jill Stein” bumper stickers will be selling like hotcakes
dv said:
roughbarked said:
Arts said:
from my quick poll, people were voting for what they thought were the ‘lesser of two evils’ so not entirely chuffed with trump, but less chuffed with Hills…
I can grok this easily. Though I’d have opted for any other candiates.
Yes I’m sure the “Don’t Blame Me, I Voted For Jill Stein” bumper stickers will be selling like hotcakes
dv said:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
NY Times: Final exit pollsPoor and lower middle class voters overwhelmingly voted for Clinton over Trump (by a 12% and 9% margin respectively).
Wealthier voters mostly voted for Trump.
Which won’t stop commentators endlessly saying it was the anti-establishment working poor where Trump got most of his support.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
NY Times: Final exit pollsPoor and lower middle class voters overwhelmingly voted for Clinton over Trump (by a 12% and 9% margin respectively).
Wealthier voters mostly voted for Trump.Which won’t stop commentators endlessly saying it was the anti-establishment working poor where Trump got most of his support.
More subjugation.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
NY Times: Final exit pollsPoor and lower middle class voters overwhelmingly voted for Clinton over Trump (by a 12% and 9% margin respectively).
Wealthier voters mostly voted for Trump.Which won’t stop commentators endlessly saying it was the anti-establishment working poor where Trump got most of his support.
It’s a terrible poll. It tells us SFA.
sibeen said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
NY Times: Final exit pollsPoor and lower middle class voters overwhelmingly voted for Clinton over Trump (by a 12% and 9% margin respectively).
Wealthier voters mostly voted for Trump.Which won’t stop commentators endlessly saying it was the anti-establishment working poor where Trump got most of his support.
It’s a terrible poll. It tells us SFA.
Seems harsh. It tells us quite a bit.
Ah well…
One thing doesn’t change which is Trump’s approval numbers, 38% approval versus 58% disapproval. These are the worst numbers for a new president ever.
dv said:
sibeen said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Which won’t stop commentators endlessly saying it was the anti-establishment working poor where Trump got most of his support.
It’s a terrible poll. It tells us SFA.
Seems harsh. It tells us quite a bit.
It simply confirms the worldwide trend to swing far right.
dv said:
Ah well…One thing doesn’t change which is Trump’s approval numbers, 38% approval versus 58% disapproval. These are the worst numbers for a new president ever.
shakes head slowly
dv said:
Ah well…One thing doesn’t change which is Trump’s approval numbers, 38% approval versus 58% disapproval. These are the worst numbers for a new president ever.
and these people have the guns he campaigned for.
dv said:
Ah well…One thing doesn’t change which is Trump’s approval numbers, 38% approval versus 58% disapproval. These are the worst numbers for a new president ever.
Ah well indeed.
I’m not planning to move there any time soon, so i imagine my life won’t change much.
dv said:
sibeen said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Which won’t stop commentators endlessly saying it was the anti-establishment working poor where Trump got most of his support.
It’s a terrible poll. It tells us SFA.
Seems harsh. It tells us quite a bit.
I haven’t looked for any beakdown on numbers, but that page tells me 25.5K people filled out a form.
It tells me that 78% of Gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender voted for Clinton, but I have no idea how many Gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender people were polled.
It tells me that 41% of people who earned under $30,000 voted for Trump, but gives no indication how many people who earned under $30,000 were polled.
Etc…etc.
It is useless.
party_pants said:
dv said:
Ah well…One thing doesn’t change which is Trump’s approval numbers, 38% approval versus 58% disapproval. These are the worst numbers for a new president ever.
Ah well indeed.
I’m not planning to move there any time soon, so i imagine my life won’t change much.
Change is actually the only thing that will happen.
Panel: What does the US election result say about misogyny?
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/us-election-result-misogyny-america-panel-woman
dv said:
sibeen said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Which won’t stop commentators endlessly saying it was the anti-establishment working poor where Trump got most of his support.
It’s a terrible poll. It tells us SFA.
Seems harsh. It tells us quite a bit.
Polls were also saying Hilary would win. They are looking more like chicken entrails.
Bubblecar said:
Panel: What does the US election result say about misogyny?https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/us-election-result-misogyny-america-panel-woman
…and so it begins.
There’ll be calls for a new election before the day is out.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
sibeen said:It’s a terrible poll. It tells us SFA.
Seems harsh. It tells us quite a bit.
Polls were also saying Hilary would win. They are looking more like chicken entrails.
I read somewhere today that 15% of those that voted today were first time voters. I guess that throws all polling models out the window if they are based on previous voting patterns. Such an influx would easily swamp the margin of error,
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
Panel: What does the US election result say about misogyny?https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/us-election-result-misogyny-america-panel-woman
…and so it begins.
There’ll be calls for a new election before the day is out.
Can you be impeached for hand in the peach?
Bubblecar said:
Panel: What does the US election result say about misogyny?https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/us-election-result-misogyny-america-panel-woman
Love ths bit:
The Nate Silver charts show that if only women voted, Clinton would have won easily.
The Nate Silver charts showed that Clinton would win easily. They were wrong on most counts.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
Panel: What does the US election result say about misogyny?https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/us-election-result-misogyny-america-panel-woman
…and so it begins.
There’ll be calls for a new election before the day is out.
Doesn’t it strike you as at least a little disgusting that an indescribably abysmal critter like Trump was elected in favour of a reasonably competent woman?
party_pants said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Seems harsh. It tells us quite a bit.
Polls were also saying Hilary would win. They are looking more like chicken entrails.
I read somewhere today that 15% of those that voted today were first time voters. I guess that throws all polling models out the window if they are based on previous voting patterns. Such an influx would easily swamp the margin of error,
I agree. But polls, polling, pundits, talking heads, all got it wrong. So just saying opinion now has to be tempered against that.
party_pants said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Seems harsh. It tells us quite a bit.
Polls were also saying Hilary would win. They are looking more like chicken entrails.
I read somewhere today that 15% of those that voted today were first time voters. I guess that throws all polling models out the window if they are based on previous voting patterns. Such an influx would easily swamp the margin of error,
Trump told us it was rigged.. “get up from your sickbeds”.. when the republicans opposed Obama’s health care…
I feel numb and sick…literally. Not even coping with one foot after the other type stuff.
party_pants said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Seems harsh. It tells us quite a bit.
Polls were also saying Hilary would win. They are looking more like chicken entrails.
I read somewhere today that 15% of those that voted today were first time voters. I guess that throws all polling models out the window if they are based on previous voting patterns. Such an influx would easily swamp the margin of error,
Oh, I should add, down there in chat is my prediction that it would come down who could motivate the most to get out of bed and I said that I thought the trump supporters would be more motivated.
kii said:
I feel numb and sick…literally. Not even coping with one foot after the other type stuff.
shares musk sticks
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
Panel: What does the US election result say about misogyny?https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/us-election-result-misogyny-america-panel-woman
…and so it begins.
There’ll be calls for a new election before the day is out.
Doesn’t it strike you as at least a little disgusting that an indescribably abysmal critter like Trump was elected in favour of a reasonably competent woman?
Yes, and I’ve never stated otherwise. Just like with the brexit vote, I find the result ridiculous; it’s just that I have this funny little way in that I actually respect a democratic vote, whether I agree with the result or not.
I’m just a bit weird that way. probably an early childhood incident that I cannot recall set it all off.
kii said:
I feel numb and sick…literally. Not even coping with one foot after the other type stuff.
So, another day less welcome than the last.
kii said:
I feel numb and sick…literally. Not even coping with one foot after the other type stuff.
I feel your pain, but have been delving deep into the relaxation therapy :)
I’ve run out of wine but have two different tracks of rainforest sounds going on the sound system, and will be going to bed wit a calming book before long.
AwesomeO said:
party_pants said:
AwesomeO said:Polls were also saying Hilary would win. They are looking more like chicken entrails.
I read somewhere today that 15% of those that voted today were first time voters. I guess that throws all polling models out the window if they are based on previous voting patterns. Such an influx would easily swamp the margin of error,
Oh, I should add, down there in chat is my prediction that it would come down who could motivate the most to get out of bed and I said that I thought the trump supporters would be more motivated.
I can give you more if you, Lazarus would arise.
Bubblecar said:
kii said:
I feel numb and sick…literally. Not even coping with one foot after the other type stuff.
I feel your pain, but have been delving deep into the relaxation therapy :)
I’ve run out of wine but have two different tracks of rainforest sounds going on the sound system, and will be going to bed wit a calming book before long.
Tawny, has been my port in this storm.
sibeen said:
Yes, and I’ve never stated otherwise. Just like with the brexit vote, I find the result ridiculous; it’s just that I have this funny little way in that I actually respect a democratic vote, whether I agree with the result or not.I’m just a bit weird that way. probably an early childhood incident that I cannot recall set it all off.
What do you mean by “respect”? In what sense is the election of Trump worthy of any “respect”?
roughbarked said:
Bubblecar said:
kii said:
I feel numb and sick…literally. Not even coping with one foot after the other type stuff.
I feel your pain, but have been delving deep into the relaxation therapy :)
I’ve run out of wine but have two different tracks of rainforest sounds going on the sound system, and will be going to bed wit a calming book before long.
Tawny, has been my port in this storm.
:)
sarahs mum said:
kii said:
I feel numb and sick…literally. Not even coping with one foot after the other type stuff.
shares musk sticks
No, thanks. I think I might actually spew :(
Strangely I have an appointment with my therapist this morning, she knows I was stressing about this election. Then mr kii and I have an appointment with the JAG officer on the base :/ I’m not sure how I will cope with any of this.
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Yes, and I’ve never stated otherwise. Just like with the brexit vote, I find the result ridiculous; it’s just that I have this funny little way in that I actually respect a democratic vote, whether I agree with the result or not.I’m just a bit weird that way. probably an early childhood incident that I cannot recall set it all off.
What do you mean by “respect”? In what sense is the election of Trump worthy of any “respect”?
I don’t respect Trump personally, but he seems to have won fair and square.
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Yes, and I’ve never stated otherwise. Just like with the brexit vote, I find the result ridiculous; it’s just that I have this funny little way in that I actually respect a democratic vote, whether I agree with the result or not.I’m just a bit weird that way. probably an early childhood incident that I cannot recall set it all off.
What do you mean by “respect”? In what sense is the election of Trump worthy of any “respect”?
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.
I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Yes, and I’ve never stated otherwise. Just like with the brexit vote, I find the result ridiculous; it’s just that I have this funny little way in that I actually respect a democratic vote, whether I agree with the result or not.I’m just a bit weird that way. probably an early childhood incident that I cannot recall set it all off.
What do you mean by “respect”? In what sense is the election of Trump worthy of any “respect”?
I don’t respect Trump personally, but he seems to have won fair and square.
What?
How the hell can you call the lies, the anger and the abuse he has thrown around as “fair and square”?
I feel extremely vulnerable because he has unleashed the hate that people feel towards women and all the other groups that are also open to the seething hate.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Yes, and I’ve never stated otherwise. Just like with the brexit vote, I find the result ridiculous; it’s just that I have this funny little way in that I actually respect a democratic vote, whether I agree with the result or not.I’m just a bit weird that way. probably an early childhood incident that I cannot recall set it all off.
What do you mean by “respect”? In what sense is the election of Trump worthy of any “respect”?
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.
I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
I’m with you apart from the lying.
two quick questions..
1. what is the protocol if there is a tie in the electoral college (is that even possible)?
2. what would happen if no votes at all were cast?
diddly-squat said:
two quick questions..
1. what is the protocol if there is a tie in the electoral college (is that even possible)?
2. what would happen if no votes at all were cast?
1. Goes to the house for a vote.
2. Some cheating bastard would.
diddly-squat said:
two quick questions..
1. what is the protocol if there is a tie in the electoral college (is that even possible)?
2. what would happen if no votes at all were cast?
You scare me.
sibeen said:
diddly-squat said:two quick questions..
1. what is the protocol if there is a tie in the electoral college (is that even possible)?
2. what would happen if no votes at all were cast?1. Goes to the house for a vote.
2. Some cheating bastard would.
1a. 269 – 269 is possible.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Yes, and I’ve never stated otherwise. Just like with the brexit vote, I find the result ridiculous; it’s just that I have this funny little way in that I actually respect a democratic vote, whether I agree with the result or not.I’m just a bit weird that way. probably an early childhood incident that I cannot recall set it all off.
What do you mean by “respect”? In what sense is the election of Trump worthy of any “respect”?
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.
I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
So, democratic vote = people being intimidated whilst standing in line to vote, as one Latino woman was until a white man stood up for her? The people doing the intimidation were a white middle aged couple.
sibeen said:
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.
Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.
Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
ROFL.
kii said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:What do you mean by “respect”? In what sense is the election of Trump worthy of any “respect”?
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.
I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
So, democratic vote = people being intimidated whilst standing in line to vote, as one Latino woman was until a white man stood up for her? The people doing the intimidation were a white middle aged couple.
I’m sure that one will turn into many. Trump assured us that the vote was rigged and that he’d deny it.
sibeen said:
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
ROFL.
And that laugh is equally puzzling. Never mind, maybe it’s an Aussie male thing :)
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.
Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
You need to read the Red Badge of Courage.
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.
Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
Something like that. I personally don’t understand how people can vote against their own self-interest like this, to accelerate their own demise, but there ya go, it happened again.
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
ROFL.
And that laugh is equally puzzling. Never mind, maybe it’s an Aussie male thing :)
Of course the result is “incorrect”,
That’s what I’m laughing at, bubbles. It just makes no sense in my world. As I’ve stated, I may not like the result, but I accept it. Jumping up and down and ranting and raving, as some are now doing, just shows childish tendencies, IMHO.
party_pants said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.
Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
Something like that. I personally don’t understand how people can vote against their own self-interest like this, to accelerate their own demise, but there ya go, it happened again.
They didn’t really have much choice. I’ve repeated all night that I’d have voted for anyone else, no matter their platform.
This is the thing that debases the USA as “Great”sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
ROFL.
So, those who jumped up and down for Abbott were correct?
And that laugh is equally puzzling. Never mind, maybe it’s an Aussie male thing :)
Of course the result is “incorrect”,
That’s what I’m laughing at, bubbles. It just makes no sense in my world. As I’ve stated, I may not like the result, but I accept it. Jumping up and down and ranting and raving, as some are now doing, just shows childish tendencies, IMHO.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
ROFL.
And that laugh is equally puzzling. Never mind, maybe it’s an Aussie male thing :)
Of course the result is “incorrect”,
That’s what I’m laughing at, bubbles. It just makes no sense in my world. As I’ve stated, I may not like the result, but I accept it. Jumping up and down and ranting and raving, as some are now doing, just shows childish tendencies, IMHO.
Well, I can but assume you would have felt the same way when Hitler became Chancellor, by democratic vote. Just accept it, no need to register any childish dismay.
roughbarked said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:And that laugh is equally puzzling. Never mind, maybe it’s an Aussie male thing :)
Of course the result is “incorrect”,
That’s what I’m laughing at, bubbles. It just makes no sense in my world. As I’ve stated, I may not like the result, but I accept it. Jumping up and down and ranting and raving, as some are now doing, just shows childish tendencies, IMHO.
So, those who jumped up and down for Abbott were correct?fixed.
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:And that laugh is equally puzzling. Never mind, maybe it’s an Aussie male thing :)
Of course the result is “incorrect”,
That’s what I’m laughing at, bubbles. It just makes no sense in my world. As I’ve stated, I may not like the result, but I accept it. Jumping up and down and ranting and raving, as some are now doing, just shows childish tendencies, IMHO.
Well, I can but assume you would have felt the same way when Hitler became Chancellor, by democratic vote. Just accept it, no need to register any childish dismay.
Bit of history…Hitler never won a democratic vote.
Just saying.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:Of course the result is “incorrect”,
That’s what I’m laughing at, bubbles. It just makes no sense in my world. As I’ve stated, I may not like the result, but I accept it. Jumping up and down and ranting and raving, as some are now doing, just shows childish tendencies, IMHO.
Well, I can but assume you would have felt the same way when Hitler became Chancellor, by democratic vote. Just accept it, no need to register any childish dismay.
Bit of history…Hitler never won a democratic vote.
Just saying.
He simply indoctrinated them with “Heil Hitler”
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:And that laugh is equally puzzling. Never mind, maybe it’s an Aussie male thing :)
Of course the result is “incorrect”,
That’s what I’m laughing at, bubbles. It just makes no sense in my world. As I’ve stated, I may not like the result, but I accept it. Jumping up and down and ranting and raving, as some are now doing, just shows childish tendencies, IMHO.
Well, I can but assume you would have felt the same way when Hitler became Chancellor, by democratic vote. Just accept it, no need to register any childish dismay.
Oh, and BTW, well done on invoking Godwin’s law. I think it was the first for the evening.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:Of course the result is “incorrect”,
That’s what I’m laughing at, bubbles. It just makes no sense in my world. As I’ve stated, I may not like the result, but I accept it. Jumping up and down and ranting and raving, as some are now doing, just shows childish tendencies, IMHO.
Well, I can but assume you would have felt the same way when Hitler became Chancellor, by democratic vote. Just accept it, no need to register any childish dismay.
Oh, and BTW, well done on invoking Godwin’s law. I think it was the first for the evening.
But not the first for DT’s camaign.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:Of course the result is “incorrect”,
That’s what I’m laughing at, bubbles. It just makes no sense in my world. As I’ve stated, I may not like the result, but I accept it. Jumping up and down and ranting and raving, as some are now doing, just shows childish tendencies, IMHO.
Well, I can but assume you would have felt the same way when Hitler became Chancellor, by democratic vote. Just accept it, no need to register any childish dismay.
Oh, and BTW, well done on invoking Godwin’s law. I think it was the first for the evening.
it was inevitable.
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:Of course the result is “incorrect”,
That’s what I’m laughing at, bubbles. It just makes no sense in my world. As I’ve stated, I may not like the result, but I accept it. Jumping up and down and ranting and raving, as some are now doing, just shows childish tendencies, IMHO.
Well, I can but assume you would have felt the same way when Hitler became Chancellor, by democratic vote. Just accept it, no need to register any childish dismay.
Oh, and BTW, well done on invoking Godwin’s law. I think it was the first for the evening.
Who gives a shit about the little memes and rules?
roughbarked said:
sibeen said:I’m starting to think that I should lift each key and clean beneath it.
Bubblecar said:Well, I can but assume you would have felt the same way when Hitler became Chancellor, by democratic vote. Just accept it, no need to register any childish dismay.
Oh, and BTW, well done on invoking Godwin’s law. I think it was the first for the evening.
But not the first for DT’s camaign.
FWIW, I haven’t seen anyone jumping up and or down, ranting or raving on this topic.
dv said:
FWIW, I haven’t seen anyone jumping up and or down, ranting or raving on this topic.
I’m not just talking about people on this site.
dv said:
FWIW, I haven’t seen anyone jumping up and or down, ranting or raving on this topic.
We haven’t flasgged down the outrage bus just yet.
sibeen said:
dv said:
FWIW, I haven’t seen anyone jumping up and or down, ranting or raving on this topic.
I’m not just talking about people on this site.
You think we care about them?
kii said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:Well, I can but assume you would have felt the same way when Hitler became Chancellor, by democratic vote. Just accept it, no need to register any childish dismay.
Oh, and BTW, well done on invoking Godwin’s law. I think it was the first for the evening.
Who gives a shit about the little memes and rules?
puts up hand
Not me. I was just pointing it out.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/joe-arpaio-arizona-republican-sheriff-loses-re-election
This is good news. It should be celebrated as democracy in action. I’m fairly certain there will be people who don’t like the result; although i suspect no-one around here.
sibeen said:
kii said:
sibeen said:Oh, and BTW, well done on invoking Godwin’s law. I think it was the first for the evening.
Who gives a shit about the little memes and rules?
puts up hand
Not me. I was just pointing it out.
Anyway, welcome to the new age of American greastness. I’m not sure he asked the south americans about this.
Many many Australians would feel dismay about the ABC … Tony Abbott.Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.
Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
the result isn’t ‘incorrect’ or ‘wrong’ bubbles… the result is the way it is because people came out and intentionally voted for Trump and he won more electoral college votes…
it’s pretty simple really…
sibeen said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/joe-arpaio-arizona-republican-sheriff-loses-re-electionThis is good news. It should be celebrated as democracy in action. I’m fairly certain there will be people who don’t like the result; although i suspect no-one around here.
Judge ye not for thee puts thyserlf inst the same partition.
sibeen said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/joe-arpaio-arizona-republican-sheriff-loses-re-electionThis is good news. It should be celebrated as democracy in action. I’m fairly certain there will be people who don’t like the result; although i suspect no-one around here.
There were smatterings of good news.
The Dems have improved their position in the House and the Senate. There were a number of good ballot measures that got up.
diddly-squat said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
See this is exactly what I mean. You don’t agree with the result, so in your mind it is “incorrect”.I respect the democratic vote. Be it a Liberla win in Australia, a Brexit win in the UK, or a Trump win in the USA. I might not like the result, but so what. As Churchill famously stated, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the rest”, or something like that.
No, I don’t understand your attitude. It’s perfectly possible to accept the result of a democratic election while at the same time deploring it.
Of course the result is “incorrect”, it’s fucking nightmarish. What it tells us about the American people is very unsettling indeed. But these are realities that we have to deal with, one way or another.
the result isn’t ‘incorrect’ or ‘wrong’ bubbles… the result is the way it is because people came out and intentionally voted for Trump and he won more electoral college votes…
it’s pretty simple really…
So it wasn’t rigged after all?
dv said:
sibeen said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/joe-arpaio-arizona-republican-sheriff-loses-re-electionThis is good news. It should be celebrated as democracy in action. I’m fairly certain there will be people who don’t like the result; although i suspect no-one around here.
There were smatterings of good news.
The Dems have improved their position in the House and the Senate. There were a number of good ballot measures that got up.
Yeah, that death penalty thingy in a few states was the grouse.
</sarcasm>
It’s depressing.
dv said:
It’s depressing.
yep.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
It’s depressing.
yep.
I’m crying and the dogs are worried about me. mr kii left for work and he tried to be cheerful – I said that’s not going to work for me right now.
dv said:
It’s depressing.
On the positive side though, Bill Clinton can start dating again.
esselte said:
dv said:
It’s depressing.
On the positive side though, Bill Clinton can start dating again.
And so can Donald. He must be getting ready to flip Melania because he’s never been married to a woman this old before.
Part of me wants to curl up and die, or at least drag my luggage out of storage and book a flight home. Damn this thing called love.
The responsible part of me is saying things like – get dressed, go to your appointments and keep your head held high. Don’t forget to take your meds.
There are a lot of amazing elements to this result but among them is that the voting was _less gender polarized than it was in Romney v Obama, despite the fact that one candidate was a woman and the other an overt misogynist.
Perhaps we should pray for a good outcome.
http://i.imgur.com/C3B8YM6.mp4
Hillary gave her concession speech.
dv said:
Hillary gave her concession speech.
pretty good one
dv said:
dv said:
Hillary gave her concession speech.
pretty good one
Just heard the tail end of it. NPR on the radio in the waiting room.
crazy….stuff may happen. i doubt he’ll run the US but his advisors will.
Wonder when we’ll get our own Trump…
monkey skipper said:
crazy….stuff may happen. i doubt he’ll run the US but his advisors will.
His aides blocked his Twitter account for the past few days. He’s not trusted to run his own Twitter account yet here he is running the country.
Divine Angel said:
monkey skipper said:
crazy….stuff may happen. i doubt he’ll run the US but his advisors will.
His aides blocked his Twitter account for the past few days. He’s not trusted to run his own Twitter account yet here he is running the country.
You should Simpsons blog about how good they are at predicting presidents…
Just picked up the SMH, that has headlines of “New World Order”
They really think that a guy who has made billions by exploiting the existing World Order is going to do anything to change that?
Just received in the Junk Mail:
Hi All,
I wish you all some peace today. This election has been exhausting and has exposed some uncomfortable truths about America. Now, it’s time to move on.
I believe in the power of music to bring folks together. In 1994, Tom Petty released the song “Time to Move On” on his Wildflowers album. It has always been a favorite of mine but in the context of this election the words take on a whole new meaning. I infused all the hope I could muster in this cover. I hope you can hear it.
Forgive me for being candid, but I am so disappointed. I hear the unrest in people’s voices and I feel it when I travel around the country. Sadly, the campaign that won this election is built on some unsettling messages that I do not agree with or condone. But, I partly blame myself. I know now that I have been too casual a citizen. It’s time for me and so many other young Americans to engage and formally state our positive, inclusive message. I will be much more involved from this point on… I hope you will be as well.
With love from the road,
Ben
Some US coal stocks are up 15% to 20% in overnight trading
huzzah
Yesterday when dv was saying that Clinton was just ahead in the popular vote, this site:
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president
was showing her just behind.
Checking today she is shown just ahead.
So is dv a really good guesser (in which case why didn’t he tell us that Trump was going to win), or is there a better site for the real numbers?
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just picked up the SMH, that has headlines of “New World Order”They really think that a guy who has made billions by exploiting the existing World Order is going to do anything to change that?
All the locals hide their tears of regret
Open fire ‘cos I love you to death
Sky high with a heartache of stone
You’ll never see me ‘cos I’m always alone
How to love without a trace of dissent
I’ll buy the torture ‘cos you pay for the rent
Tied high with a broken command
You’re all alone to the promised land
I’m in love with this malicious intent
You’ve been taken but you don’t know it yet
What you will know must never live to be found
‘Cos it’s the subject of the eyes of the clown
What we are looking at
Is good and evil, right and wrong
A new world order
A new world order
A new world order
A new world order
We’re not about to make that same mistakes right
A new world order
A new world order
A new world order
i’ve officially declared australia a state of the US
yeah, musical chairs at home’n taken in it in the
transition said:
i’ve officially declared australia a state of the US
yeah, musical chairs at home’n taken in it in the
The desperate for attention look and me look at me semi retarded cousin state
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just picked up the SMH, that has headlines of “New World Order”They really think that a guy who has made billions by exploiting the existing World Order is going to do anything to change that?
He will keep exploiting, that wont change.
One of my cousins was twice removed.
Cymek said:
transition said:
i’ve officially declared australia a state of the US
yeah, musical chairs at home’n taken in it in theThe desperate for attention look and me look at me semi retarded cousin state
all a bit perverse the obscene whatever it is, weird intrigue.
Peak Warming Man said:
One of my cousins was twice removed.
Was he put back?
Peak Warming Man said:
One of my cousins was twice removed.
so was Postpoc… but he didn’t stand for it…
I bet the gun problem will now get worse with Trump in.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just picked up the SMH, that has headlines of “New World Order”They really think that a guy who has made billions by exploiting the existing World Order is going to do anything to change that?
And another thing.
The paper SMH says stock markets plunged, but the Electric internet says they are up (at least in OuEsAy), so who’s right?
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just picked up the SMH, that has headlines of “New World Order”They really think that a guy who has made billions by exploiting the existing World Order is going to do anything to change that?
Well it could be that he’ll cut out the middle man and become a direct oligarch. That’s kind of new.
Biden sums it all up nicely.
http://imgur.com/gallery/fQH6m
The Rev Dodgson said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just picked up the SMH, that has headlines of “New World Order”They really think that a guy who has made billions by exploiting the existing World Order is going to do anything to change that?
And another thing.
The paper SMH says stock markets plunged, but the Electric internet says they are up (at least in OuEsAy), so who’s right?
they went down..ceptin’ for gold. and then they went up.
Coal is up a lot.
CrazyNeutrino said:
I bet the gun problem will now get worse with Trump in.
nothin’ better to do today?
sarahs mum said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just picked up the SMH, that has headlines of “New World Order”They really think that a guy who has made billions by exploiting the existing World Order is going to do anything to change that?
And another thing.
The paper SMH says stock markets plunged, but the Electric internet says they are up (at least in OuEsAy), so who’s right?
they went down..ceptin’ for gold. and then they went up.
Coal is up a lot.

The Rev Dodgson said:
Yesterday when dv was saying that Clinton was just ahead in the popular vote, this site:
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president
was showing her just behind.Checking today she is shown just ahead.
So is dv a really good guesser (in which case why didn’t he tell us that Trump was going to win), or is there a better site for the real numbers?
I’m not a good guesser but I am a pretty good projector. I could see how many votes remained to be counted in the western states (which a) close polls later and b) are rich in Clinton voters) and do a basic linear extrapolation to estimate how many more surplus Clinton votes remained.
The Rev Dodgson said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just picked up the SMH, that has headlines of “New World Order”They really think that a guy who has made billions by exploiting the existing World Order is going to do anything to change that?
And another thing.
The paper SMH says stock markets plunged, but the Electric internet says they are up (at least in OuEsAy), so who’s right?
Initially they did, but, apparently there was a speech which seemed to be favourable to investor vampire squid types.
Peak Warming Man said:
One of my cousins was twice removed.
from your mother’s side?
The Rev Dodgson said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just picked up the SMH, that has headlines of “New World Order”They really think that a guy who has made billions by exploiting the existing World Order is going to do anything to change that?
And another thing.
The paper SMH says stock markets plunged, but the Electric internet says they are up (at least in OuEsAy), so who’s right?
There was about 250 point plunge in the Allords but it has since recovered
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Yesterday when dv was saying that Clinton was just ahead in the popular vote, this site:
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president
was showing her just behind.Checking today she is shown just ahead.
So is dv a really good guesser (in which case why didn’t he tell us that Trump was going to win), or is there a better site for the real numbers?
I’m not a good guesser but I am a pretty good projector. I could see how many votes remained to be counted in the western states (which a) close polls later and b) are rich in Clinton voters) and do a basic linear extrapolation to estimate how many more surplus Clinton votes remained.
Congrats on the good projections then.
It does seem a bit surprising to me that in the mainstream meeja:
No-one even gives a mention that Clinton is ahead in the total vote count.
No-one (other than Michael Moore) worked out in advance that if the total vote was pretty close then Trump would win by a mile.
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Just picked up the SMH, that has headlines of “New World Order”They really think that a guy who has made billions by exploiting the existing World Order is going to do anything to change that?
And another thing.
The paper SMH says stock markets plunged, but the Electric internet says they are up (at least in OuEsAy), so who’s right?
There was about 250 point plunge in the Allords but it has since recovered
Ah, OK, I was looking at the US markets which had a big jump when it looked like Hilary would win, and have gone up steadily ever since, even though she didn’t.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Yesterday when dv was saying that Clinton was just ahead in the popular vote, this site:
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president
was showing her just behind.Checking today she is shown just ahead.
So is dv a really good guesser (in which case why didn’t he tell us that Trump was going to win), or is there a better site for the real numbers?
I’m not a good guesser but I am a pretty good projector. I could see how many votes remained to be counted in the western states (which a) close polls later and b) are rich in Clinton voters) and do a basic linear extrapolation to estimate how many more surplus Clinton votes remained.
Congrats on the good projections then.
It does seem a bit surprising to me that in the mainstream meeja:
No-one even gives a mention that Clinton is ahead in the total vote count.
No-one (other than Michael Moore) worked out in advance that if the total vote was pretty close then Trump would win by a mile.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/hillary-clinton-popular-vote-electoral-college-donald-trump
If current projections hold, Hillary Clinton will soon become the second presidential nominee to win the popular vote yet lose the electoral college – and thus the White House – in the past five US presidential elections.
CrazyNeutrino said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:I’m not a good guesser but I am a pretty good projector. I could see how many votes remained to be counted in the western states (which a) close polls later and b) are rich in Clinton voters) and do a basic linear extrapolation to estimate how many more surplus Clinton votes remained.
Congrats on the good projections then.
It does seem a bit surprising to me that in the mainstream meeja:
No-one even gives a mention that Clinton is ahead in the total vote count.
No-one (other than Michael Moore) worked out in advance that if the total vote was pretty close then Trump would win by a mile.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/hillary-clinton-popular-vote-electoral-college-donald-trump
If current projections hold, Hillary Clinton will soon become the second presidential nominee to win the popular vote yet lose the electoral college – and thus the White House – in the past five US presidential elections.
What are the differences between the popular vote and the electoral college votes?
CrazyNeutrino said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/hillary-clinton-popular-vote-electoral-college-donald-trumpIf current projections hold, Hillary Clinton will soon become the second presidential nominee to win the popular vote yet lose the electoral college – and thus the White House – in the past five US presidential elections.
Well when I say mainstream meeja, I really mean ABC TV :)
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Yesterday when dv was saying that Clinton was just ahead in the popular vote, this site:
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president
was showing her just behind.Checking today she is shown just ahead.
So is dv a really good guesser (in which case why didn’t he tell us that Trump was going to win), or is there a better site for the real numbers?
I’m not a good guesser but I am a pretty good projector. I could see how many votes remained to be counted in the western states (which a) close polls later and b) are rich in Clinton voters) and do a basic linear extrapolation to estimate how many more surplus Clinton votes remained.
Congrats on the good projections then.
It does seem a bit surprising to me that in the mainstream meeja:
No-one even gives a mention that Clinton is ahead in the total vote count.
No-one (other than Michael Moore) worked out in advance that if the total vote was pretty close then Trump would win by a mile.
Well that last isn’t true. The fivethirtyeight crew noted that Trump had a clear electoral college advantage and that there was a decent chance of a split of this kind.
eg this article written on 31 October.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-odds-of-an-electoral-college-popular-vote-split-are-increasing/
The Rev Dodgson said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/hillary-clinton-popular-vote-electoral-college-donald-trumpIf current projections hold, Hillary Clinton will soon become the second presidential nominee to win the popular vote yet lose the electoral college – and thus the White House – in the past five US presidential elections.
Well when I say mainstream meeja, I really mean ABC TV :)
It is also the case that the Republicans have only won the popular vote in presidential contests once since the 1980s.
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Congrats on the good projections then.
It does seem a bit surprising to me that in the mainstream meeja:
No-one even gives a mention that Clinton is ahead in the total vote count.
No-one (other than Michael Moore) worked out in advance that if the total vote was pretty close then Trump would win by a mile.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/09/hillary-clinton-popular-vote-electoral-college-donald-trump
If current projections hold, Hillary Clinton will soon become the second presidential nominee to win the popular vote yet lose the electoral college – and thus the White House – in the past five US presidential elections.
What are the differences between the popular vote and the electoral college votes?
How the US Electoral College Works
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUS9mM8Xbbw
The Problem with the US Electoral College
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wC42HgLA4k
The Problem with the US Electoral College (Updated)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcZTTB10_Vo
They are talking about Gingrich as being the likely Secretary of State.
I mean if you switch off the care factor it is kind of funny.
Trump says that he will sign an order eliminating gun-free zones in schools on his “first day” in office.
dv said:
Trump says that he will sign an order eliminating gun-free zones in schools on his “first day” in office.
that should stop them shootings…
dv said:
Trump says that he will sign an order eliminating gun-free zones in schools on his “first day” in office.
I wonder if the yanks use lead in their water pipes
dv said:
Trump says that he will sign an order eliminating gun-free zones in schools on his “first day” in office.
And this is for kindergarten and pre-primary classes, so little Johnny can bring a semiautomatic rifle to school for show and tell
What happens if the Electors decide that Hills should be POTUS and not Trump??
http://news.groopspeak.com/breaking-trump-considering-sarah-palin-for-top-cabinet-position/
More specifically, it’s been revealed that she could head the Department Of the Interior as Interior Secretary, giving her vast powers over the nation’s natural resources and climate change policy.
Ever since Palin’s meteoric rise to fame in the 2008 presidential campaign, the former Alaska Governor has been one of the leading voices in the climate change denial movement. While the move isn’t yet official, Trump has already stated publicly that he’d like to put Palin in his cabinet in one form or another
diddly-squat said:
What happens if the Electors decide that Hills should be POTUS and not Trump??
Fair question. Probably civil war.
>>Trump has already stated publicly that he’d like to put Palin in his cabinet
You put the lotion on………………
dv said:
diddly-squat said:What happens if the Electors decide that Hills should be POTUS and not Trump??
Fair question. Probably civil war.

sarahs mum said:
http://news.groopspeak.com/breaking-trump-considering-sarah-palin-for-top-cabinet-position/More specifically, it’s been revealed that she could head the Department Of the Interior as Interior Secretary, giving her vast powers over the nation’s natural resources and climate change policy.
Ever since Palin’s meteoric rise to fame in the 2008 presidential campaign, the former Alaska Governor has been one of the leading voices in the climate change denial movement. While the move isn’t yet official, Trump has already stated publicly that he’d like to put Palin in his cabinet in one form or another
Trump will fill his cabinet with dumbasses and unleash a flood of dumbasses onto the world media.
sarahs mum said:
http://news.groopspeak.com/breaking-trump-considering-sarah-palin-for-top-cabinet-position/More specifically, it’s been revealed that she could head the Department Of the Interior as Interior Secretary, giving her vast powers over the nation’s natural resources and climate change policy.
Ever since Palin’s meteoric rise to fame in the 2008 presidential campaign, the former Alaska Governor has been one of the leading voices in the climate change denial movement. While the move isn’t yet official, Trump has already stated publicly that he’d like to put Palin in his cabinet in one form or another
Trump will fill his cabinet with dumbasses and unleash a flood of dumbasses onto the world media.
So Melania will certainly make an interesting FLOTUS
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:What happens if the Electors decide that Hills should be POTUS and not Trump??
Fair question. Probably civil war.
![]()
Nope, they are running away from Trump, they cannot get away fast enough.
diddly-squat said:
So Melania will certainly make an interesting FLOTUS
Don’t worry the left wing media attack dogs are chaffing at the bit and ready to cut loose and make Trump pay for making them look silly.
So initial demographics suggest that lowly educated working class while males were Trumps biggest supporters – especially in states where this particular demographic have supported the Democrats.
In addition, there was a small swing to the Democrats from highly educated people that usually vote Republican…
CrazyNeutrino said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:Fair question. Probably civil war.
![]()
Nope, they are running away from Trump, they cannot get away fast enough.
Must… get… to… that… plane… its going to Canada.
Peak Warming Man said:
diddly-squat said:So Melania will certainly make an interesting FLOTUS
Don’t worry the left wing media attack dogs are chaffing at the bit and ready to cut loose and make Trump pay for making them look silly.
But she will sell more New Ideas and Women’s Monthly’s.
Something Wicked This Way Comes….
kii said:
Something Wicked This Way Comes….
You’re a Wizard Donald
diddly-squat said:
So initial demographics suggest that lowly educated working class while males were Trumps biggest supporters – especially in states where this particular demographic have supported the Democrats.
In addition, there was a small swing to the Democrats from highly educated people that usually vote Republican…
Low education but middle to high paid.
Peak Warming Man said:
diddly-squat said:So Melania will certainly make an interesting FLOTUS
Don’t worry the left wing media attack dogs are chaffing at the bit and ready to cut loose and make Trump pay for making them look silly.
Media been looking silly for a while, more broadly.
diddly-squat said:
So Melania will certainly make an interesting FLOTUS
In what way?
She’s a cardboard cut-out shallow ex model. What was that show back in the 60s with a robotic woman?
https://twitter.com/siyandawrites/status/796286719058382848
Siyanda on the online radicalisation of young men by the alt-right.
kii said:
diddly-squat said:So Melania will certainly make an interesting FLOTUS
In what way?
She’s a cardboard cut-out shallow ex model. What was that show back in the 60s with a robotic woman?
In that the FLOTUS has, in recent history at least, been a real champion for truly altruistic agendas… I don’t really see that from here, I think she’ll be more of the 50’s style “woman behind the man” type…
but I’m open to being proven wrong…
sarahs mum said:
http://news.groopspeak.com/breaking-trump-considering-sarah-palin-for-top-cabinet-position/More specifically, it’s been revealed that she could head the Department Of the Interior as Interior Secretary, giving her vast powers over the nation’s natural resources and climate change policy.
Ever since Palin’s meteoric rise to fame in the 2008 presidential campaign, the former Alaska Governor has been one of the leading voices in the climate change denial movement. While the move isn’t yet official, Trump has already stated publicly that he’d like to put Palin in his cabinet in one form or another
Fucking hell …
maybe I just need to triple my pain killers and have a laugh
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:So Melania will certainly make an interesting FLOTUS
In what way?
She’s a cardboard cut-out shallow ex model. What was that show back in the 60s with a robotic woman?
In that the FLOTUS has, in recent history at least, been a real champion for truly altruistic agendas… I don’t really see that from here, I think she’ll be more of the 50’s style “woman behind the man” type…
but I’m open to being proven wrong…
But she’s going to stop bullies!
diddly-squat said:
So initial demographics suggest that lowly educated working class while males were Trumps biggest supporters – especially in states where this particular demographic have supported the Democrats.
In addition, there was a small swing to the Democrats from highly educated people that usually vote Republican…
To me the most amazing thing is that Hillary, a woman running against kind of a sexist boor, did not do as well with women voters as Obama did last time, as a dude running against basically a normal dude.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
http://news.groopspeak.com/breaking-trump-considering-sarah-palin-for-top-cabinet-position/More specifically, it’s been revealed that she could head the Department Of the Interior as Interior Secretary, giving her vast powers over the nation’s natural resources and climate change policy.
Ever since Palin’s meteoric rise to fame in the 2008 presidential campaign, the former Alaska Governor has been one of the leading voices in the climate change denial movement. While the move isn’t yet official, Trump has already stated publicly that he’d like to put Palin in his cabinet in one form or another
Fucking hell …
maybe I just need to triple my pain killers and have a laugh
I’ve given in and been taking my anti-anxiety meds since last night.Can’t wait for the medical marijuana card.
kii said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:In what way?
She’s a cardboard cut-out shallow ex model. What was that show back in the 60s with a robotic woman?
In that the FLOTUS has, in recent history at least, been a real champion for truly altruistic agendas… I don’t really see that from here, I think she’ll be more of the 50’s style “woman behind the man” type…
but I’m open to being proven wrong…
But she’s going to stop bullies!
a worthy cause
This is how it’s going to be from now on:
Malcolm Turnbull standing to attention when he talks to Donald Trump.

kii said:
diddly-squat said:So Melania will certainly make an interesting FLOTUS
In what way?
She’s a cardboard cut-out shallow ex model. What was that show back in the 60s with a robotic woman?
I don’t have anything bad to say about Melania, I’m sure she is a nice person and I hope her anti-bullying campaign works out, but it is clear she is not going to be like Michelle Obama.
Maybe Hillary has a chance after 4 years of Trump at the next election.
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:In that the FLOTUS has, in recent history at least, been a real champion for truly altruistic agendas… I don’t really see that from here, I think she’ll be more of the 50’s style “woman behind the man” type…
but I’m open to being proven wrong…
But she’s going to stop bullies!
a worthy cause
Derrr….she needs to start with her POTUS and step sons.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:So initial demographics suggest that lowly educated working class while males were Trumps biggest supporters – especially in states where this particular demographic have supported the Democrats.
In addition, there was a small swing to the Democrats from highly educated people that usually vote Republican…
To me the most amazing thing is that Hillary, a woman running against kind of a sexist boor, did not do as well with women voters as Obama did last time, as a dude running against basically a normal dude.
I think the core problem for Hills is that she stayed with Bills… there seem to be a lot of woman that simply don’t see that as a particularly strong character trait…
dv said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:So Melania will certainly make an interesting FLOTUS
In what way?
She’s a cardboard cut-out shallow ex model. What was that show back in the 60s with a robotic woman?
I don’t have anything bad to say about Melania, I’m sure she is a nice person and I hope her anti-bullying campaign works out, but it is clear she is not going to be like Michelle Obama.
I don’t trust her.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Maybe Hillary has a chance after 4 years of Trump at the next election.
roffle… i don’t think so…
CrazyNeutrino said:
Maybe Hillary has a chance after 4 years of Trump at the next election.
Hillary just lost an unloseable election. I doubt she would be interested in running again but if she did, she would not win the Democratic primaries. The Dems will have to beat fire with fire and choose someone charismatic and likeable.
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Maybe Hillary has a chance after 4 years of Trump at the next election.
Hillary just lost an unloseable election. I doubt she would be interested in running again but if she did, she would not win the Democratic primaries. The Dems will have to beat fire with fire and choose someone charismatic and likeable.
Stephen Colbert
I really don’t know if Trump has the sort of work ethic required to be POTUS, or at least I think he’s going to be in for a very big surprise at what will be required of him…
Obama’s speech was a good one.. he will be sorely missed
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-10/obama-speaks-after-trump-victory/8011574
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Maybe Hillary has a chance after 4 years of Trump at the next election.
Hillary just lost an unloseable election. I doubt she would be interested in running again but if she did, she would not win the Democratic primaries. The Dems will have to beat fire with fire and choose someone charismatic and likeable.
Stephen Colbert
She ran before, didn’t she in 2008?
Maybe the Third time she might get lucky.
diddly-squat said:
I really don’t know if Trump has the sort of work ethic required to be POTUS, or at least I think he’s going to be in for a very big surprise at what will be required of him…
Obama’s speech was a good one.. he will be sorely missed
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-10/obama-speaks-after-trump-victory/8011574
Obama was a good president, he just didn’t have any power. Trump now has all the power, if only he can bring himself to work with the people he has alienated.
diddly-squat said:
I really don’t know if Trump has the sort of work ethic required to be POTUS, or at least I think he’s going to be in for a very big surprise at what will be required of him…
Obama’s speech was a good one.. he will be sorely missed
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-10/obama-speaks-after-trump-victory/8011574
Well Trump might get lucky and be impeached because of the underage rapes or fraud trials
Today I have seen one former bookseller talk about his suicidal feelings on fb. The comment is gone and hopefully his family have stepped up again.
Countless posts in a few groups expressing fear and others trying to be supportive and offering places to move to…away from serious red states.
Suicide Prevention Hotline info being shared.
There are already verbal attacks on LGBT booksellers being reported….
“Just got told by a fellow college student that my rainbow equality button won’t matter anymore because Trump and Pence are gonna “set the country right and get rid of you f*gs.”
A trans bookseller is fearing for her life, because she is openly trans at work.
Others on a closed group are expressing real fear about leaving their homes to go to school/work.
One just said some students they are at college with have left the country and gone back to Mexico. overnight.
Two gay men had FAGGOTS spray painted on their fence.
mcgoon said:
This is how it’s going to be from now on:Malcolm Turnbull standing to attention when he talks to Donald Trump.
You have a funny definition of standing to attention.
In January the first black president hands over the reigns to a man back by the Ku Klux Klan.
sibeen said:
mcgoon said:
This is how it’s going to be from now on:Malcolm Turnbull standing to attention when he talks to Donald Trump.
You have a funny definition of standing to attention.
Forgive him, he’s a pusser.
kii said:
Today I have seen one former bookseller talk about his suicidal feelings on fb. The comment is gone and hopefully his family have stepped up again.Countless posts in a few groups expressing fear and others trying to be supportive and offering places to move to…away from serious red states.
Suicide Prevention Hotline info being shared.
There are already verbal attacks on LGBT booksellers being reported….
“Just got told by a fellow college student that my rainbow equality button won’t matter anymore because Trump and Pence are gonna “set the country right and get rid of you f*gs.”
A trans bookseller is fearing for her life, because she is openly trans at work.
Others on a closed group are expressing real fear about leaving their homes to go to school/work.
One just said some students they are at college with have left the country and gone back to Mexico. overnight.
Two gay men had FAGGOTS spray painted on their fence.
:(
sibeen said:
mcgoon said:
This is how it’s going to be from now on:Malcolm Turnbull standing to attention when he talks to Donald Trump.
You have a funny definition of standing to attention.
I don’t know… what’s that other hand doing?
sibeen said:
mcgoon said:
This is how it’s going to be from now on:Malcolm Turnbull standing to attention when he talks to Donald Trump.
You have a funny definition of standing to attention.
he looks like he is doing a readjustment to me..
kii said:
In January the first black president hands over the reigns to a man back by the Ku Klux Klan.
yep.
diddly-squat said:
sibeen said:
mcgoon said:
This is how it’s going to be from now on:Malcolm Turnbull standing to attention when he talks to Donald Trump.
You have a funny definition of standing to attention.
I don’t know… what’s that other hand doing?
Pocket ping pong?
diddly-squat said:
I don’t know… what’s that other hand doing?
holding the phone
Looks like the Dems increased their position in the senate to 48, up from 46.
And gained 7 more seats in the House of Reps.
Did the 3rd party vote contribute to this mess?
I have two people in my life who may be removed from the xmas card list.
dv said:
Looks like the Dems increased their position in the senate to 48, up from 46.
And gained 7 more seats in the House of Reps.
They’ll need every seat they can get.
“Is anyone else getting messages from people in your community to kill yourself or to come and find God? I just woke up to my old boss telling me to kill myself and an old coworkers boss saying all us queers can come and learn about God from him”
kii said:
Did the 3rd party vote contribute to this mess?I have two people in my life who may be removed from the xmas card list.
In fairness, probably not. Johnson took pretty evenly from Clinton and Trump.
Prrrobably you could argue that without Stein in the race, Clinton would have won Pennsylvania since that was quite close, but even without Pennsylvania, Trump would have won.
kii said:
Did the 3rd party vote contribute to this mess?I have two people in my life who may be removed from the xmas card list.
exit polls suggest almost 10% of all voters under 45 voted for 3rd party candidates
Hill’s speech was awesome.
dv said:
kii said:
Did the 3rd party vote contribute to this mess?I have two people in my life who may be removed from the xmas card list.
In fairness, probably not. Johnson took pretty evenly from Clinton and Trump.
Prrrobably you could argue that without Stein in the race, Clinton would have won Pennsylvania since that was quite close, but even without Pennsylvania, Trump would have won.
meh…luckily I don’t actually have a xmas card list.
One woman is on the way out of my life for some dreadful behaviour, the other one is an elderly air head.
Good contribution by Waleed Aly:
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/us-election-2016-its-not-about-racism-or-sexism-its-about-class-warfare-20161109-gslxzs.html
Witty Rejoinder said:
Good contribution by Waleed Aly:http://www.theage.com.au/comment/us-election-2016-its-not-about-racism-or-sexism-its-about-class-warfare-20161109-gslxzs.html
You know what? I think it is about more than one thing.
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Good contribution by Waleed Aly:http://www.theage.com.au/comment/us-election-2016-its-not-about-racism-or-sexism-its-about-class-warfare-20161109-gslxzs.html
You know what? I think it is about more than one thing.
True but I think economics is the biggest single factor.
For the next election an ideal candidate would be a transgender atheist lesbian who parents are Muslim and Mexican
sibeen said:
mcgoon said:
This is how it’s going to be from now on:Malcolm Turnbull standing to attention when he talks to Donald Trump.
You have a funny definition of standing to attention.
Obviously he was waiting to be connected.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Good contribution by Waleed Aly:http://www.theage.com.au/comment/us-election-2016-its-not-about-racism-or-sexism-its-about-class-warfare-20161109-gslxzs.html
W. Aly has a show on Radio National called The Mind Field where he gets fallow self appointed rich intellectuals to talk in stratospheric five syllable language about how the proletariats are being duded by the elite.
Peak Warming Man said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Good contribution by Waleed Aly:http://www.theage.com.au/comment/us-election-2016-its-not-about-racism-or-sexism-its-about-class-warfare-20161109-gslxzs.html
W. Aly has a show on Radio National called The Mind Field where he gets fallow self appointed rich intellectuals to talk in stratospheric five syllable language about how the proletariats are being duded by the elite.
Why only fallow ones?
A new approach to population control?
kii said:
Ugly!
“Is anyone else getting messages from people in your community to kill yourself or to come and find God? I just woke up to my old boss telling me to kill myself and an old coworkers boss saying all us queers can come and learn about God from him”
Obama has handed a surveillance state and war machine to a maniac
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/president-trump-national-security-nuclear-arsenal
Bubblecar said:
Obama has handed a surveillance state and war machine to a maniachttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/president-trump-national-security-nuclear-arsenal
You can almost picture his clumsily jabbing at buttons on the nuclear football asking “And what does this one do ?”
Speaking of polls.
https://twitter.com/i/videos/tweet/795808580620283905?
Witty Rejoinder said:
Interesting. Thanks.
Good contribution by Waleed Aly:http://www.theage.com.au/comment/us-election-2016-its-not-about-racism-or-sexism-its-about-class-warfare-20161109-gslxzs.html
Bubblecar said:
Hmmmmm.
Obama has handed a surveillance state and war machine to a maniachttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/president-trump-national-security-nuclear-arsenal
It appears the Democrats also made a gain in state legislatures, picking up Nevada and New Mexico, but losing Kentucky. So Democrats now control both houses of legislature in kii’s home state.
Among state senates, Dems will pick up Washington, Nevada, and lose Iowa, Minnesota.
Peak Warming Man said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Good contribution by Waleed Aly:http://www.theage.com.au/comment/us-election-2016-its-not-about-racism-or-sexism-its-about-class-warfare-20161109-gslxzs.html
W. Aly has a show on Radio National called The Mind Field where he gets fallow self appointed rich intellectuals to talk in stratospheric five syllable language about how the proletariats are being duded by the elite.
He should totally run for President of Australia.
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Good contribution by Waleed Aly:http://www.theage.com.au/comment/us-election-2016-its-not-about-racism-or-sexism-its-about-class-warfare-20161109-gslxzs.html
You know what? I think it is about more than one thing.
someone should make a list
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Good contribution by Waleed Aly:http://www.theage.com.au/comment/us-election-2016-its-not-about-racism-or-sexism-its-about-class-warfare-20161109-gslxzs.html
You know what? I think it is about more than one thing.
someone should make a list
I like lists, they are very handy to have around.
If we start a list about Trump Gaffes, it will be running very hot I would imagine.
In addition to the elections, more than 100 state ballot measures were voted on.
Some highlights:
A ballot measure to allow preferential voting in Maine appears to be headed for victory. This would be a first for the US which usually relies on first-past-the-post voting.
7 of the 9 marijuana legalisation measures got up, and there is now a nice solid block of weed-states on the western part of the country.
4 of the 5 measures to increase state minimum wage also succeeded.
An initiative to establish universal healthcare in Colorado was way defeated by 80% – 20%.
An initiative requiring background checks for ammo purchases in California was successful. A background checks for gun sales measure was also successful in Nevada, but a similar one in Maine was defeated.
I know you can say this about a lot of things but, what is wrong with people?
Mr Trump struck a conciliatory tone in his first speech, saying the country needed to unify following the vote.
“I pledge to every citizen of our land that I will be president for all Americans and this is so important to me,” he said.
“For those who have chosen not to support me … I’m reaching out to you for your guidance and your help so that we can work together and unify our great country.
This is pretty impressive.. though the cynic in me thinks it might have come from a Lincoln Speech.. maybe Kennedy
furious said:
- An initiative to establish universal healthcare in Colorado was way defeated by 80% – 20%.
I know you can say this about a lot of things but, what is wrong with people?
Greed cannot help other people.
Arts said:
Mr Trump struck a conciliatory tone in his first speech, saying the country needed to unify following the vote.“I pledge to every citizen of our land that I will be president for all Americans and this is so important to me,” he said.
“For those who have chosen not to support me … I’m reaching out to you for your guidance and your help so that we can work together and unify our great country.
This is pretty impressive.. though the cynic in me thinks it might have come from a Lincoln Speech.. maybe Kennedy
I think you need to trust the better angels of your nature.
dv said:
In addition to the elections, more than 100 state ballot measures were voted on.Some highlights:
A ballot measure to allow preferential voting in Maine appears to be headed for victory. This would be a first for the US which usually relies on first-past-the-post voting.
7 of the 9 marijuana legalisation measures got up, and there is now a nice solid block of weed-states on the western part of the country.
4 of the 5 measures to increase state minimum wage also succeeded.
An initiative to establish universal healthcare in Colorado was way defeated by 80% – 20%.
An initiative requiring background checks for ammo purchases in California was successful. A background checks for gun sales measure was also successful in Nevada, but a similar one in Maine was defeated.
Yet Nebraska, Oklahoma and California voted to keep or re-introduce the death penalty.
It is a strange world.
Peak Warming Man said:
Arts said:
Mr Trump struck a conciliatory tone in his first speech, saying the country needed to unify following the vote.“I pledge to every citizen of our land that I will be president for all Americans and this is so important to me,” he said.
“For those who have chosen not to support me … I’m reaching out to you for your guidance and your help so that we can work together and unify our great country.
This is pretty impressive.. though the cynic in me thinks it might have come from a Lincoln Speech.. maybe Kennedy
I think you need to trust the better angels of your nature.
It was a nice speech and to be honest I was expecting worse.
Arts said:
Mr Trump struck a conciliatory tone in his first speech, saying the country needed to unify following the vote.“I pledge to every citizen of our land that I will be president for all Americans and this is so important to me,” he said.
“For those who have chosen not to support me … I’m reaching out to you for your guidance and your help so that we can work together and unify our great country.
This is pretty impressive.. though the cynic in me thinks it might have come from a Lincoln Speech.. maybe Kennedy
These are at least the right sorts of noises.
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Arts said:
Mr Trump struck a conciliatory tone in his first speech, saying the country needed to unify following the vote.“I pledge to every citizen of our land that I will be president for all Americans and this is so important to me,” he said.
“For those who have chosen not to support me … I’m reaching out to you for your guidance and your help so that we can work together and unify our great country.
This is pretty impressive.. though the cynic in me thinks it might have come from a Lincoln Speech.. maybe Kennedy
I was surprised too – obviously written for him ( as are the speeches for all politicians). But then it took a turn to a rambling, thank all my mates, 70th birthday party speech
I think you need to trust the better angels of your nature.
It was a nice speech and to be honest I was expecting worse.
Wait … what’s going to happen to Trump TV? Is he still going to be running that?
dv said:
Wait … what’s going to happen to Trump TV? Is he still going to be running that?
in four years there’ll be an Apprentice President edition.. where the next two candidates will be chosen through a series of eliminating challenges…
dv said:
Wait … what’s going to happen to Trump TV? Is he still going to be running that?
Yep – telescreens – as in 1984 :-)
dv said:
Wait … what’s going to happen to Trump TV? Is he still going to be running that?
Yep – telescreens – as in 1984 :-)
dv said:
Wait … what’s going to happen to Trump TV? Is he still going to be running that?
A new Trump mini series?
I bet he will be a war monger
he will make a mess where ever he goes
just wait
I wonder if the Whitehouse will remove all the letter T’s from Keyboards?
So, business as usual for the US then…
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-a-difference-2-percentage-points-makes/
Article on how small shifts in votes can completely change the narrative
furious said:
- I bet he will be a war monger
he will make a mess where ever he goesSo, business as usual for the US then…
It would be hard to tell the difference
furious said:
…
So, business as usual for the US then…
Probably one of the few intelligent things said so far. Yes, I think business as usual. Trumps grandiosity is going to crash against reality. Advisors and bureaucracy are going to tell him why it is inadvisable, illegal, or expensive to do the things he wants to do. He is going to learn about blowback and unintended consequences dealing with other nations, and the consequences of trade wars.
AwesomeO said:
furious said:…
So, business as usual for the US then…
Probably one of the few intelligent things said so far. Yes, I think business as usual. Trumps grandiosity is going to crash against reality. Advisors and bureaucracy are going to tell him why it is inadvisable, illegal, or expensive to do the things he wants to do. He is going to learn about blowback and unintended consequences dealing with other nations, and the consequences of trade wars.
I imagine the USA behind the scenes has less power than it used to with such high levels of debt
Cymek said:
furious said:
- I bet he will be a war monger
he will make a mess where ever he goesSo, business as usual for the US then…
It would be hard to tell the difference
The Midas touch is where every thing touched turns to gold, so could it be called the Trump touch when every thing touched turns to shit?
AwesomeO said:
Trumps grandiosity is going to crash against reality. Advisors and bureaucracy are going to tell him why it is inadvisable, illegal, or expensive to do the things he wants to do. He is going to learn about blowback and unintended consequences dealing with other nations, and the consequences of trade wars.
Yes. I will interested to see what happens when he tries to abandon NAFTA and the TPP and impose a 35% tariff on US companies that manufacture overseas to take advantage of cheap labour. I imagine a few big US companies and multinationals will lobby extremely hard to prevent it, as well as the right wing of the GOP who regard free trade as some sort of vision of gospel purity.
AwesomeO said:
furious said:…
So, business as usual for the US then…
Probably one of the few intelligent things said so far. Yes, I think business as usual. Trumps grandiosity is going to crash against reality. Advisors and bureaucracy are going to tell him why it is inadvisable, illegal, or expensive to do the things he wants to do. He is going to learn about blowback and unintended consequences dealing with other nations, and the consequences of trade wars.
And what makes you think he’s going to care about such things? He’s a drama queen, he enjoys creating crisis and hysteria.
Cymek said:
AwesomeO said:
furious said:…
So, business as usual for the US then…
Probably one of the few intelligent things said so far. Yes, I think business as usual. Trumps grandiosity is going to crash against reality. Advisors and bureaucracy are going to tell him why it is inadvisable, illegal, or expensive to do the things he wants to do. He is going to learn about blowback and unintended consequences dealing with other nations, and the consequences of trade wars.
I imagine the USA behind the scenes has less power than it used to with such high levels of debt
Well its debts are only payable to it in dollars so as long as other countries have faith… China owns America already, it holds most of the debt.
America has been tending more to isolationism militarily at least, since Bushs adventures there is no desire for boots on the ground and I sense no desire to project power. They have lost confidence and why should they, they get condemned no matter what they do anyway.
If China wants they can step up and start giving half the world aid and sending carrier groups to rebuild after cyclones but I don’t see that happening any time.
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-a-difference-2-percentage-points-makes/Article on how small shifts in votes can completely change the narrative
The electoral college seems to be close to the crappiest system ever invented…
Bubblecar said:
AwesomeO said:
furious said:…
So, business as usual for the US then…
Probably one of the few intelligent things said so far. Yes, I think business as usual. Trumps grandiosity is going to crash against reality. Advisors and bureaucracy are going to tell him why it is inadvisable, illegal, or expensive to do the things he wants to do. He is going to learn about blowback and unintended consequences dealing with other nations, and the consequences of trade wars.
And what makes you think he’s going to care about such things? He’s a drama queen, he enjoys creating crisis and hysteria.
Well time will tell. I commend you to any of Woodwards books dealing with Obamas education about the reality of government and what is possible and what is not. Rhetoric is easy but the world is complicated and interlinked.
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-a-difference-2-percentage-points-makes/Article on how small shifts in votes can completely change the narrative
The electoral college seems to be close to the crappiest system ever invented…
Yep. (I do like the Hare/Clark system in Tas. But the Liberals don’t and are talking about changing it. :(And I think it was more representational when we had 7 people representing each electorate rather than the 5 we have now.)
AwesomeO said:
America has been tending more to isolationism militarily at least, since Bushs adventures there is no desire for boots on the ground and I sense no desire to project power. They have lost confidence and why should they, they get condemned no matter what they do anyway.
There was a bit in an article in the Graun this morning that made me blink. It stated that Trump may pull out of Afghanistan, and this would be a bad thing.
Bubblecar said:
AwesomeO said:
furious said:…
So, business as usual for the US then…
Probably one of the few intelligent things said so far. Yes, I think business as usual. Trumps grandiosity is going to crash against reality. Advisors and bureaucracy are going to tell him why it is inadvisable, illegal, or expensive to do the things he wants to do. He is going to learn about blowback and unintended consequences dealing with other nations, and the consequences of trade wars.
And what makes you think he’s going to care about such things? He’s a drama queen, he enjoys creating crisis and hysteria.
Is Trump gay?
AwesomeO said:
Cymek said:
AwesomeO said:Probably one of the few intelligent things said so far. Yes, I think business as usual. Trumps grandiosity is going to crash against reality. Advisors and bureaucracy are going to tell him why it is inadvisable, illegal, or expensive to do the things he wants to do. He is going to learn about blowback and unintended consequences dealing with other nations, and the consequences of trade wars.
I imagine the USA behind the scenes has less power than it used to with such high levels of debt
Well its debts are only payable to it in dollars so as long as other countries have faith… China owns America already, it holds most of the debt.
America has been tending more to isolationism militarily at least, since Bushs adventures there is no desire for boots on the ground and I sense no desire to project power. They have lost confidence and why should they, they get condemned no matter what they do anyway.
If China wants they can step up and start giving half the world aid and sending carrier groups to rebuild after cyclones but I don’t see that happening any time.
China doesn’t care about anything that doesn’t increase their power
Cymek said:
China doesn’t care about anything that doesn’t increase their power
Seems harsh.
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:America has been tending more to isolationism militarily at least, since Bushs adventures there is no desire for boots on the ground and I sense no desire to project power. They have lost confidence and why should they, they get condemned no matter what they do anyway.
There was a bit in an article in the Graun this morning that made me blink. It stated that Trump may pull out of Afghanistan, and this would be a bad thing.
Graveyard of Empires. Afgahnistan is not a state as such, Kabul doesn’t rule a stones thrown beyond where the asphalt runs out. It is a collection of warring tribes in ancient perpetual conflict of payback who culturally have no qualms about changing loyalties and leavened by religious conservatism and fundamentalism.
Ain’t nobody got time fo dat.
Current stock market prices are mainly green. What happened to the predicted crash?
Witty Rejoinder said:
Cymek said:China doesn’t care about anything that doesn’t increase their power
Seems harsh.
The ruling government anyway
PermeateFree said:
Current stock market prices are mainly green. What happened to the predicted crash?
went down. bounced back.
sarahs mum said:
PermeateFree said:
Current stock market prices are mainly green. What happened to the predicted crash?
went down. bounced back.
And some more apparently.
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:America has been tending more to isolationism militarily at least, since Bushs adventures there is no desire for boots on the ground and I sense no desire to project power. They have lost confidence and why should they, they get condemned no matter what they do anyway.
There was a bit in an article in the Graun this morning that made me blink. It stated that Trump may pull out of Afghanistan, and this would be a bad thing.
Oh, I think I see what you mean, the Graun are critical going in, critical going out and critical staying, America is criticised no matter what it does.
PermeateFree said:
sarahs mum said:
PermeateFree said:
Current stock market prices are mainly green. What happened to the predicted crash?
went down. bounced back.
And some more apparently.
apparently.
AwesomeO said:
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:America has been tending more to isolationism militarily at least, since Bushs adventures there is no desire for boots on the ground and I sense no desire to project power. They have lost confidence and why should they, they get condemned no matter what they do anyway.
There was a bit in an article in the Graun this morning that made me blink. It stated that Trump may pull out of Afghanistan, and this would be a bad thing.
Oh, I think I see what you mean, the Graun are critical going in, critical going out and critical staying, America is criticised no matter what it does.
Precisely. Damned no matter what they do.
AwesomeO said:
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:America has been tending more to isolationism militarily at least, since Bushs adventures there is no desire for boots on the ground and I sense no desire to project power. They have lost confidence and why should they, they get condemned no matter what they do anyway.
There was a bit in an article in the Graun this morning that made me blink. It stated that Trump may pull out of Afghanistan, and this would be a bad thing.
Oh, I think I see what you mean, the Graun are critical going in, critical going out and critical staying, America is criticised no matter what it does.
That’s probably true and they are judged rather harshly but I suppose if because the douchbags make all the noise and the decent ones are quiet behind the scenes doing good.
The Obama administration has reduced US troops in Afghanistan from 100000 to 9000. Compare this to the number of troops the US in Japan (about 50000) or Germany (35000). Basically all that exists in Afghanistan is training and station keeping.
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:
sibeen said:There was a bit in an article in the Graun this morning that made me blink. It stated that Trump may pull out of Afghanistan, and this would be a bad thing.
Oh, I think I see what you mean, the Graun are critical going in, critical going out and critical staying, America is criticised no matter what it does.
Precisely. Damned no matter what they do.
were all these articles written by the same reporter? cos papers usually have more than one and each can have a different take. or even the circumstances change over time.
Think some people ought to get hot water and mop this thread out before the blood stains everything.
AwesomeO said:
sibeen said:
AwesomeO said:America has been tending more to isolationism militarily at least, since Bushs adventures there is no desire for boots on the ground and I sense no desire to project power. They have lost confidence and why should they, they get condemned no matter what they do anyway.
There was a bit in an article in the Graun this morning that made me blink. It stated that Trump may pull out of Afghanistan, and this would be a bad thing.
Oh, I think I see what you mean, the Graun are critical going in, critical going out and critical staying, America is criticised no matter what it does.
I think you’ll find the Guardian editorially are more moderate centre-left than many of the articles they publish.
Sensible people like me don’t read The Guardian anyway.
dv said:
The Obama administration has reduced US troops in Afghanistan from 100000 to 9000. Compare this to the number of troops the US in Japan (about 50000) or Germany (35000). Basically all that exists in Afghanistan is training and station keeping.
how many US troops are still in Sth Korea?
The Guardian is generally hated by the more delusional left because they don’t support Corbyn and they backed Hillary over Bernie.
party_pants said:
Sensible people like me don’t read The Guardian anyway.
i read the guardian.
“Donald Trump’s Campaign for Science Illiteracy”
The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.
This very expensive GLOBAL WARMING bullshit has got to stop. Our planet is freezing, record low temps, and our GW scientists are stuck in ice
NBC News just called it the great freeze—coldest weather in years. Is our country still spending money on the GLOBAL WARMING HOAX?
Any and all weather events are used by the GLOBAL WARMING HOAXSTERS to justify higher taxes to save our planet! They don’t believe it $$$$!
Global warming is based on faulty science and manipulated data which is proven by the emails that were leased
Ice storm rolls from Texas to Tennessee—I’m in Los Angeles and it’s freezing. Global warming is a total, and very expensive, hoax!
I’ve seen people where they have a perfectly healthy child, and they go for the vaccinations, and a month later the child is no longer healthy.
Autism rates through the roof—why doesn’t the Obama administration do something about doctor-inflicted autism. We lose nothing to try.
Healthy young child goes to doctor, gets pumped with massive shot of many vaccines, doesn’t feel good and changes—AUTISM. Many such cases!
The U.S. cannot allow EBOLA infected people back. People that go to far away places to help out are great—but must suffer the consequences!
Same CDC which is bringing Ebola to US misplaced samples of anthrax earlier this year http://www.cnn.com/2014/07/15/health/cdc-anthrax-ziploc-bags/…Be careful.
ObamaCare gives free insurance to illegal immigrants. Yet @BarackObama is cutting our troops healthcare. http://bit.ly/xFlfQs Outrageous.
Not only are wind farms disgusting looking, but even worse they are bad for people’s health http://bit.ly/I9Dl8k They should be outlawed and allowed only in heavily industrialized areas.
Scientific American
Bubblecar said:
The Guardian is generally hated by the more delusional left because they don’t support Corbyn and they backed Hillary over Bernie.
They’re copping double vitriol now that Trump has won, as if many of the voters who elected an ostentatiously regressive president only did so because Hillary “wasn’t progressive enough”.
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
The Guardian is generally hated by the more delusional left because they don’t support Corbyn and they backed Hillary over Bernie.
They’re copping double vitriol now that Trump has won, as if many of the voters who elected an ostentatiously regressive president only did so because Hillary “wasn’t progressive enough”.
Well that is just idiotic.
AwesomeO said:
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
The Guardian is generally hated by the more delusional left because they don’t support Corbyn and they backed Hillary over Bernie.
They’re copping double vitriol now that Trump has won, as if many of the voters who elected an ostentatiously regressive president only did so because Hillary “wasn’t progressive enough”.
Well that is just idiotic.
It’s been a very common theme in recent years. We’re expected to believe UK voters swung right at the last election because Miliband wasn’t sufficiently left. Must make sense in some sort of mindset :)
AwesomeO said:
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
The Guardian is generally hated by the more delusional left because they don’t support Corbyn and they backed Hillary over Bernie.
They’re copping double vitriol now that Trump has won, as if many of the voters who elected an ostentatiously regressive president only did so because Hillary “wasn’t progressive enough”.
Well that is just idiotic.
Could be expressed more clearly too.
PermeateFree said:
Bubblecar said:
AwesomeO said:Probably one of the few intelligent things said so far. Yes, I think business as usual. Trumps grandiosity is going to crash against reality. Advisors and bureaucracy are going to tell him why it is inadvisable, illegal, or expensive to do the things he wants to do. He is going to learn about blowback and unintended consequences dealing with other nations, and the consequences of trade wars.
And what makes you think he’s going to care about such things? He’s a drama queen, he enjoys creating crisis and hysteria.
Is Trump gay?
Do you mean happy or homosexual?
bob(from black rock) said:
PermeateFree said:
Bubblecar said:And what makes you think he’s going to care about such things? He’s a drama queen, he enjoys creating crisis and hysteria.
Is Trump gay?
Do you mean happy or homosexual?
I dare say some drama queens are happy creating crisis and hysteria.
Bubblecar said:
AwesomeO said:
furious said:…
So, business as usual for the US then…
Probably one of the few intelligent things said so far. Yes, I think business as usual. Trumps grandiosity is going to crash against reality. Advisors and bureaucracy are going to tell him why it is inadvisable, illegal, or expensive to do the things he wants to do. He is going to learn about blowback and unintended consequences dealing with other nations, and the consequences of trade wars.
And what makes you think he’s going to care about such things? He’s a drama queen, he enjoys creating crisis and hysteria.
Its sure shaping up to be a strange Presidency.
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-a-difference-2-percentage-points-makes/Article on how small shifts in votes can completely change the narrative
The electoral college seems to be close to the crappiest system ever invented…
They need to rethink that. Could do with an overhaul.
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
The Guardian is generally hated by the more delusional left because they don’t support Corbyn and they backed Hillary over Bernie.
They’re copping double vitriol now that Trump has won, as if many of the voters who elected an ostentatiously regressive president only did so because Hillary “wasn’t progressive enough”.
not really… the Bernie mob are, at the moment, pushing a more “this is your own fault so suffer in a jocks” type barrow…
but having said that, I don’t think having Bernie as a candidate would have changed much… he’s too socialist for for most people to swallow…
Donald Trump: Protesters take to US streets to rally against election result
um, too late people, you should have protested the day before the election, the Day Before or a few days before, now look at yourselves.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Donald Trump: Protesters take to US streets to rally against election resultum, too late people, you should have protested the day before the election, the Day Before or a few days before, now look at yourselves.
4 days late.
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Donald Trump: Protesters take to US streets to rally against election resultum, too late people, you should have protested the day before the election, the Day Before or a few days before, now look at yourselves.
4 days late.
Like they had a whole Year to protest, now they do it 2 days after it.?
???
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
The Obama administration has reduced US troops in Afghanistan from 100000 to 9000. Compare this to the number of troops the US in Japan (about 50000) or Germany (35000). Basically all that exists in Afghanistan is training and station keeping.
how many US troops are still in Sth Korea?
25000 according to wiki
Dear oh dear, on the news, riots and violence intensifying. Oh well, luvvies did predict this would happen.
AwesomeO said:
Dear oh dear, on the news, riots and violence intensifying. Oh well, luvvies did predict this would happen.
It’s crazy town. But probably would have happened either way
AwesomeO said:
Dear oh dear, on the news, riots and violence intensifying. Oh well, luvvies did predict this would happen.
I haven’t seen any of that, probably because the corrupt mainstream media are filtering it. All I’ve seen is reports of protests.
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
Dear oh dear, on the news, riots and violence intensifying. Oh well, luvvies did predict this would happen.
I haven’t seen any of that, probably because the corrupt mainstream media are filtering it. All I’ve seen is reports of protests.
Last bit of ABC afternoon news before throwing across to the drum. Intensifying was their words.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
Dear oh dear, on the news, riots and violence intensifying. Oh well, luvvies did predict this would happen.
I haven’t seen any of that, probably because the corrupt mainstream media are filtering it. All I’ve seen is reports of protests.
Last bit of ABC afternoon news before throwing across to the drum. Intensifying was their words.
Were “riots” and “violence” their words?
Pictures and footage emerged of furious protesters burning flags, rioters setting fire to rubbish and angrily confronting Trump supporters…
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2147684/violence-erupts-across-the-us-as-pro-clinton-fans-riot-after-donald-trumps-shock-election-win/
FLAGS are burning and effigies of President-elect Donald Trump are hanging in the streets as Americans come to grips with their new leader.
http://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/flag-burned-as-protests-breakout-across-the-us/news-story/7207fa8f6208de3f26aa256a89d2cb74
and of course
http://www.infowars.com/hillary-supporters-burn-american-flag-riot-threaten-to-kill-trump-after-losing-election/
you read the wrong media DV.
;-)
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:I haven’t seen any of that, probably because the corrupt mainstream media are filtering it. All I’ve seen is reports of protests.
Last bit of ABC afternoon news before throwing across to the drum. Intensifying was their words.
Were “riots” and “violence” their words?
I looked for a transcript, no dice, I suggest you tune in at 7, or catch the late afternoon news if your time zone allows.
ChrispenEvan said:
Pictures and footage emerged of furious protesters burning flags, rioters setting fire to rubbish and angrily confronting Trump supporters…https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2147684/violence-erupts-across-the-us-as-pro-clinton-fans-riot-after-donald-trumps-shock-election-win/
FLAGS are burning and effigies of President-elect Donald Trump are hanging in the streets as Americans come to grips with their new leader.
http://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/flag-burned-as-protests-breakout-across-the-us/news-story/7207fa8f6208de3f26aa256a89d2cb74
and of course
http://www.infowars.com/hillary-supporters-burn-american-flag-riot-threaten-to-kill-trump-after-losing-election/
you read the wrong media DV.
;-)
Why didn’t they protest before the Election?
CrazyNeutrino said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Pictures and footage emerged of furious protesters burning flags, rioters setting fire to rubbish and angrily confronting Trump supporters…https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2147684/violence-erupts-across-the-us-as-pro-clinton-fans-riot-after-donald-trumps-shock-election-win/
FLAGS are burning and effigies of President-elect Donald Trump are hanging in the streets as Americans come to grips with their new leader.
http://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/flag-burned-as-protests-breakout-across-the-us/news-story/7207fa8f6208de3f26aa256a89d2cb74
and of course
http://www.infowars.com/hillary-supporters-burn-american-flag-riot-threaten-to-kill-trump-after-losing-election/
you read the wrong media DV.
;-)
Why didn’t they protest before the Election?
They weren’t pissed off then.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
AwesomeO said:Last bit of ABC afternoon news before throwing across to the drum. Intensifying was their words.
Were “riots” and “violence” their words?
I looked for a transcript, no dice, I suggest you tune in at 7, or catch the late afternoon news if your time zone allows.
A transcript of a riot would be interesting.
CrazyNeutrino said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Were “riots” and “violence” their words?
I looked for a transcript, no dice, I suggest you tune in at 7, or catch the late afternoon news if your time zone allows.
A transcript of a riot would be interesting.
What are you doing here crazy, I thought you would have hurled yourself out of a ground floor window by now?
wow, got away with referencing infowars and nobody pulled me up.
;-)
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
AwesomeO said:I looked for a transcript, no dice, I suggest you tune in at 7, or catch the late afternoon news if your time zone allows.
A transcript of a riot would be interesting.
What are you doing here crazy, I thought you would have hurled yourself out of a ground floor window by now?
I’m having a stiff drink at the Restaurant at the End of the Universe.
I see some intellectuals made it, good on them, I’m just sitting by myself at the end of the Bar.
Interesting listening to RN on the way home. Apparently the president elect has to reveal all business dealings to the public. This is part of the way the Republic protects its president from being unduly influenced by outside sources. So the tax returns will now be public.
The drop in the peso immediately makes all Mexican goods cheaper in America.
The plans for reducing taxes (business and personal) doesn’t match well with the promises to spend on infrastructure.
They were the things that struck me.
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:A transcript of a riot would be interesting.
What are you doing here crazy, I thought you would have hurled yourself out of a ground floor window by now?
I’m having a stiff drink at the Restaurant at the End of the Universe.
I see some intellectuals made it, good on them, I’m just sitting by myself at the end of the Bar.
Trump Tower is reputed to be at the end of the universe.
AwesomeO said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
ChrispenEvan said:
Pictures and footage emerged of furious protesters burning flags, rioters setting fire to rubbish and angrily confronting Trump supporters…https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2147684/violence-erupts-across-the-us-as-pro-clinton-fans-riot-after-donald-trumps-shock-election-win/
FLAGS are burning and effigies of President-elect Donald Trump are hanging in the streets as Americans come to grips with their new leader.
http://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/flag-burned-as-protests-breakout-across-the-us/news-story/7207fa8f6208de3f26aa256a89d2cb74
and of course
http://www.infowars.com/hillary-supporters-burn-american-flag-riot-threaten-to-kill-trump-after-losing-election/
you read the wrong media DV.
;-)
Why didn’t they protest before the Election?
They weren’t pissed off then.
Hey, don’t blame them, they voted for Jill Stein
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:What are you doing here crazy, I thought you would have hurled yourself out of a ground floor window by now?
I’m having a stiff drink at the Restaurant at the End of the Universe.
I see some intellectuals made it, good on them, I’m just sitting by myself at the end of the Bar.
Trump Tower is reputed to be at the end of the universe.
Looks around, I cannot see it, it must be at the Other End of the Universe
TRUMP’s Promises
1. Repeal Obamacare
2. Replace Obamacare
3. Build a Wall
4. Make Mexico pay for it.
5. Deport 12 million illegals
6. Ban Muslim Immigrants
7. Renegotiate NAFTA and other Trade deals (Gina).
8. Unite America
9. Build military to be BEST in World- Fearsome !
10. Cut deficits.
11. Rebuild Infrastructure.
12. Revise Tax code (to be more fair- to whom?)
13. Help middle class income (create millions of good paying jobs)
14. Destroy ISIS (w Russia’s help ? – bomb the sh!!te outta them!)
15. Renegotiate Iran Nuclear Deal
16. Bring back 100,000s of good paying manufacturing jobs
17. Bring back coal miners jobs (promise to WVa)
18. Bring back respectability of USA in World opinion
19. Reduce Crime in USA
20. Fix inner cities – make livable again. (promise to Blacks- what have you got to lose?)
21. Produce 4% GDP in economy.
Among US adults

dv said:
Among US adults
I would say that it is democracy in action. The people who were concerned enough to vote did. Those who were not concerned did not. Why should a bunch of people who could not give a damn decide who should govern the nation. Scraping the barrel there .
Wouldn’t be different if voting was dynamic, on going, all the time.
That people could change their vote any time.
A completely different approach.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Wouldn’t be different if voting was dynamic, on going, all the time.That people could change their vote any time.
A completely different approach.
Wouldn’t it be different if voting was dynamic, on going, all the time.
Fixed
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Wouldn’t be different if voting was dynamic, on going, all the time.That people could change their vote any time.
A completely different approach.
Wouldn’t it be different if voting was dynamic, on going, all the time.
Fixed
No controversial decision would be made, which would mean very little would happen.
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Wouldn’t be different if voting was dynamic, on going, all the time.That people could change their vote any time.
A completely different approach.
Wouldn’t it be different if voting was dynamic, on going, all the time.
Fixed
No controversial decision would be made, which would mean very little would happen.
How would that be known?
Has there ever been such a system in place?
PermeateFree said:
No controversial decision would be made, which would mean very little would happen.
As opposed to the radical and revolutionary times in which we live.
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:Wouldn’t it be different if voting was dynamic, on going, all the time.
Fixed
No controversial decision would be made, which would mean very little would happen.
How would that be known?
Has there ever been such a system in place?
Medieval Poland had a system of government by a unity of fiefdoms and any king could veto any decision as a consequence nothing was done and the state was paralysed.
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:Wouldn’t it be different if voting was dynamic, on going, all the time.
Fixed
No controversial decision would be made, which would mean very little would happen.
How would that be known?
Has there ever been such a system in place?
Politicians strong attitude towards self-preservation.
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:Wouldn’t it be different if voting was dynamic, on going, all the time.
Fixed
No controversial decision would be made, which would mean very little would happen.
How would that be known?
Has there ever been such a system in place?
Or it could be something different again
Like the Peoples vote influencing the Senate vote
something like that maybe
roughbarked said:
TRUMP’s Promises1. Repeal Obamacare
2. Replace Obamacare
3. Build a Wall
4. Make Mexico pay for it.
5. Deport 12 million illegals
6. Ban Muslim Immigrants
7. Renegotiate NAFTA and other Trade deals (Gina).
8. Unite America
9. Build military to be BEST in World- Fearsome !
10. Cut deficits.
11. Rebuild Infrastructure.
12. Revise Tax code (to be more fair- to whom?)
13. Help middle class income (create millions of good paying jobs)
14. Destroy ISIS (w Russia’s help ? – bomb the sh!!te outta them!)
15. Renegotiate Iran Nuclear Deal
16. Bring back 100,000s of good paying manufacturing jobs
17. Bring back coal miners jobs (promise to WVa)
18. Bring back respectability of USA in World opinion
19. Reduce Crime in USA
20. Fix inner cities – make livable again. (promise to Blacks- what have you got to lose?)
21. Produce 4% GDP in economy.
he said something about improving mental health services – which I think is the one I agree with
dv said:
Among US adults!https://s21.postimg.org/geny0ypw7/mona_chalabi_us_election_2016.png
you can see the texta lines… I like that authenticity
Here ya go. Liberum veto from wiki.
The liberum veto (Latin for “the free veto”) was a parliamentary device in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. It was a form of unanimity voting rule that allowed any member of the Sejm (legislature) to force an immediate end to the current session and nullify any legislation that had already been passed at the session by shouting Sisto activitatem! (Latin: “I stop the activity!”) or Nie pozwalam! (Polish: “I do not allow!”). The rule was in place from the mid-17th to the late 18th century in the Sejm’s parliamentary deliberations. It was based on the premise that since all Polish noblemen were equal, every measure that came before the Sejm had to be passed unanimously. The principle of liberum veto was a key part of the political system of the Commonwealth, strengthening democratic elements and checking royal power, going against the European-wide trend of having a strong executive (absolute monarchy).
Many historians hold that the principle of liberum veto was a major cause of the deterioration of the Commonwealth political system—particularly in the 18th century, when foreign powers bribed Sejm members to paralyze its proceedings—and the Commonwealth’s eventual destruction in the partitions of Poland and foreign occupation, dominance and manipulation of Poland for the next 200 years or so. Piotr Stefan Wandycz wrote that the “liberum veto had become the sinister symbol of old Polish anarchy.” In the period of 1573–1763, about 150 sejms were held, out of which about a third failed to pass any legislation, mostly due to liberum veto. The expression Polish parliament in many European languages originated from this apparent paralysis.
Arts said:
roughbarked said:
TRUMP’s Promises1. Repeal Obamacare
2. Replace Obamacare
3. Build a Wall
4. Make Mexico pay for it.
5. Deport 12 million illegals
6. Ban Muslim Immigrants
7. Renegotiate NAFTA and other Trade deals (Gina).
8. Unite America
9. Build military to be BEST in World- Fearsome !
10. Cut deficits.
11. Rebuild Infrastructure.
12. Revise Tax code (to be more fair- to whom?)
13. Help middle class income (create millions of good paying jobs)
14. Destroy ISIS (w Russia’s help ? – bomb the sh!!te outta them!)
15. Renegotiate Iran Nuclear Deal
16. Bring back 100,000s of good paying manufacturing jobs
17. Bring back coal miners jobs (promise to WVa)
18. Bring back respectability of USA in World opinion
19. Reduce Crime in USA
20. Fix inner cities – make livable again. (promise to Blacks- what have you got to lose?)
21. Produce 4% GDP in economy.he said something about improving mental health services – which I think is the one I agree with
Will he stop people with mental illness buying a gun?
CrazyNeutrino said:
Arts said:
roughbarked said:
TRUMP’s Promises1. Repeal Obamacare
2. Replace Obamacare
3. Build a Wall
4. Make Mexico pay for it.
5. Deport 12 million illegals
6. Ban Muslim Immigrants
7. Renegotiate NAFTA and other Trade deals (Gina).
8. Unite America
9. Build military to be BEST in World- Fearsome !
10. Cut deficits.
11. Rebuild Infrastructure.
12. Revise Tax code (to be more fair- to whom?)
13. Help middle class income (create millions of good paying jobs)
14. Destroy ISIS (w Russia’s help ? – bomb the sh!!te outta them!)
15. Renegotiate Iran Nuclear Deal
16. Bring back 100,000s of good paying manufacturing jobs
17. Bring back coal miners jobs (promise to WVa)
18. Bring back respectability of USA in World opinion
19. Reduce Crime in USA
20. Fix inner cities – make livable again. (promise to Blacks- what have you got to lose?)
21. Produce 4% GDP in economy.he said something about improving mental health services – which I think is the one I agree with
Will he stop people with mental illness buying a gun?
he’s going to give guns to “good honest law abiding citizens’… i don’t know how is going to monitor that
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:No controversial decision would be made, which would mean very little would happen.
How would that be known?
Has there ever been such a system in place?
Politicians strong attitude towards self-preservation.
Do away with political parties might be a better way.
I think we need some new thinking on political models for the future.
We need to water down Greed if we want to survive, and that will be very difficult to nearly impossible.
AwesomeO said:
Here ya go. Liberum veto from wiki.The liberum veto (Latin for “the free veto”) was a parliamentary device in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. It was a form of unanimity voting rule that allowed any member of the Sejm (legislature) to force an immediate end to the current session and nullify any legislation that had already been passed at the session by shouting Sisto activitatem! (Latin: “I stop the activity!”) or Nie pozwalam! (Polish: “I do not allow!”). The rule was in place from the mid-17th to the late 18th century in the Sejm’s parliamentary deliberations. It was based on the premise that since all Polish noblemen were equal, every measure that came before the Sejm had to be passed unanimously. The principle of liberum veto was a key part of the political system of the Commonwealth, strengthening democratic elements and checking royal power, going against the European-wide trend of having a strong executive (absolute monarchy).
Many historians hold that the principle of liberum veto was a major cause of the deterioration of the Commonwealth political system—particularly in the 18th century, when foreign powers bribed Sejm members to paralyze its proceedings—and the Commonwealth’s eventual destruction in the partitions of Poland and foreign occupation, dominance and manipulation of Poland for the next 200 years or so. Piotr Stefan Wandycz wrote that the “liberum veto had become the sinister symbol of old Polish anarchy.” In the period of 1573–1763, about 150 sejms were held, out of which about a third failed to pass any legislation, mostly due to liberum veto. The expression Polish parliament in many European languages originated from this apparent paralysis.
It’s possible I’ve just forgotten, but I’m pretty sure we weren’t told anything of that in history at school.
Arts said:
dv said:
Among US adults!https://s21.postimg.org/geny0ypw7/mona_chalabi_us_election_2016.png
you can see the texta lines… I like that authenticity
IKR
but the numbers are right
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
Here ya go. Liberum veto from wiki.The liberum veto (Latin for “the free veto”) was a parliamentary device in the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. It was a form of unanimity voting rule that allowed any member of the Sejm (legislature) to force an immediate end to the current session and nullify any legislation that had already been passed at the session by shouting Sisto activitatem! (Latin: “I stop the activity!”) or Nie pozwalam! (Polish: “I do not allow!”). The rule was in place from the mid-17th to the late 18th century in the Sejm’s parliamentary deliberations. It was based on the premise that since all Polish noblemen were equal, every measure that came before the Sejm had to be passed unanimously. The principle of liberum veto was a key part of the political system of the Commonwealth, strengthening democratic elements and checking royal power, going against the European-wide trend of having a strong executive (absolute monarchy).
Many historians hold that the principle of liberum veto was a major cause of the deterioration of the Commonwealth political system—particularly in the 18th century, when foreign powers bribed Sejm members to paralyze its proceedings—and the Commonwealth’s eventual destruction in the partitions of Poland and foreign occupation, dominance and manipulation of Poland for the next 200 years or so. Piotr Stefan Wandycz wrote that the “liberum veto had become the sinister symbol of old Polish anarchy.” In the period of 1573–1763, about 150 sejms were held, out of which about a third failed to pass any legislation, mostly due to liberum veto. The expression Polish parliament in many European languages originated from this apparent paralysis.
It’s possible I’ve just forgotten, but I’m pretty sure we weren’t told anything of that in history at school.
Positive it wasn’t covered when I was at school.
CrazyNeutrino said:
I think we need some new thinking on political models for the future.We need to water down Greed if we want to survive, and that will be very difficult to nearly impossible.
I think most people think that including the majority of the voting American public. Traditional politics is not working very well, whether Trump will be the way, we shall have to find out, but he will be different.
CrazyNeutrino said:
I think we need some new thinking on political models for the future.We need to water down Greed if we want to survive, and that will be very difficult to nearly impossible.
Well, someone came up with an idea for that a while ago. They called it ‘communism’.
Eventually, it turned out that communism was pretty good at ‘watering down greed’ in most of the population, as it simply prevented the development of any situation in which that majority could exercise any aspect of greed.
Paradoxically, it simultaneously fostered the rampant development of greed among the minorities in charge of the communist system.
“It will come as no surprise that I did not vote for Trump but I think it is important that we respect the fact that he has been elected fairly. Once he is in office I will likely take issue with his policies but I don’t think it is right to protest his election.”
Ref: My niece in California.
dv said:
Arts said:
dv said:
Among US adults!https://s21.postimg.org/geny0ypw7/mona_chalabi_us_election_2016.png
you can see the texta lines… I like that authenticity
IKR
but the numbers are right
it’s a weird system… to get the popular vote but still not win…
although at least we know it’s not just a damn popularity contest with these kids
buffy said:
“It will come as no surprise that I did not vote for Trump but I think it is important that we respect the fact that he has been elected fairly. Once he is in office I will likely take issue with his policies but I don’t think it is right to protest his election.”
Ref: My niece in California.
Good for her if she thinks it was fair.
PermeateFree said:
…whether Trump will be the way, we shall have to find out, but he will be different.
There’s going to be a lot of re-arranging of deck-chairs among the American power elite, as they try to position themselves to ‘manage’ Donald Trump.
Like Admiral Yamamoto, he may ‘run wild for six to twelve months’ but after that, the lobby/pressure/industry/wealth groups will have their act sorted out, and start pulling the strings on the puppet.
Sort of like America’s Tony Abbott, but with a shade more initial freedom.
Arts said:
dv said:
Arts said:you can see the texta lines… I like that authenticity
IKR
but the numbers are right
it’s a weird system… to get the popular vote but still not win…
although at least we know it’s not just a damn popularity contest with these kids
I don’t understand their system at all. I have a lot of trouble with a countrywide thing being decided patchwork style. If you are going to elect a President, just let the parties sort out their candidates and then get everyone (universal suffrage and compulsory voting) vote as a whole country thing. Then sort out your congress and stuff separately.
dv said:
Arts said:
dv said:
Among US adults!https://s21.postimg.org/geny0ypw7/mona_chalabi_us_election_2016.png
you can see the texta lines… I like that authenticity
IKR
but the numbers are right
So the lowest turnout in known history of US elections.
The media were telling us it was a huge turnout.
roughbarked said:
buffy said:“It will come as no surprise that I did not vote for Trump but I think it is important that we respect the fact that he has been elected fairly. Once he is in office I will likely take issue with his policies but I don’t think it is right to protest his election.”
Ref: My niece in California.
Good for her if she thinks it was fair.
It was completely fair within the system that they use.
mcgoon said:
PermeateFree said:
…whether Trump will be the way, we shall have to find out, but he will be different.
There’s going to be a lot of re-arranging of deck-chairs among the American power elite, as they try to position themselves to ‘manage’ Donald Trump.
Like Admiral Yamamoto, he may ‘run wild for six to twelve months’ but after that, the lobby/pressure/industry/wealth groups will have their act sorted out, and start pulling the strings on the puppet.
Sort of like America’s Tony Abbott, but with a shade more initial freedom.
Yes, I see similarities between Trump and Abbott, I think it will be a bumpy ride for Americans somehow.

Clive Palmer ( you remember Clive Palmer? No? Oh, well…)
Anyway, Clive Palmer must be a rich shade of envious green at Donald Trump’s execution of the dream that he held himself.
buffy said:
“It will come as no surprise that I did not vote for Trump but I think it is important that we respect the fact that he has been elected fairly. Once he is in office I will likely take issue with his policies but I don’t think it is right to protest his election.”
Ref: My niece in California.
Why not? It upsets the people who voted for him, and that’s a worthy enough aim.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Arts said:you can see the texta lines… I like that authenticity
IKR
but the numbers are right
So the lowest turnout in known history of US elections.
The media were telling us it was a huge turnout.
It isn’t the lowest turnout. It is actually more than last time.
http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/11/aaron-sorkin-donald-trump-president-letter-daughter
Read the Letter Aaron Sorkin Wrote His Daughter After Donald Trump Was Elected President
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:IKR
but the numbers are right
So the lowest turnout in known history of US elections.
The media were telling us it was a huge turnout.
It isn’t the lowest turnout. It is actually more than last time.
do they have sausage sizzles at american voting booths?
stumpy_seahorse said:
do they have sausage sizzles at american voting booths?
Yes, but none are ever eaten, because they insist on dyeing them all red, white, and blue.
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:IKR
but the numbers are right
So the lowest turnout in known history of US elections.
The media were telling us it was a huge turnout.
It isn’t the lowest turnout. It is actually more than last time.
Not in percentage terms which any sane person uses when doing historic comparisons of these things.
mcgoon said:
stumpy_seahorse said:do they have sausage sizzles at american voting booths?
Yes, but none are ever eaten, because they insist on dyeing them all red, white, and blue.
at least they died a nice colour. that also my wish.
mcgoon said:
stumpy_seahorse said:do they have sausage sizzles at american voting booths?
Yes, but none are ever eaten, because they insist on dyeing them all red, white, and blue.
ahhh… liberty sausage….
I wonder if the current electoral gerrymander will prevent a Democrat takeover of congress if Trump’s first two years are suitably chaotic?
dv said:
http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/11/aaron-sorkin-donald-trump-president-letter-daughterRead the Letter Aaron Sorkin Wrote His Daughter After Donald Trump Was Elected President
Look, it is a great letter, but:
First of all, we remember that we’re not alone. A hundred million people in America and a billion more around the world feel exactly the same way we do.
If a hundred million people in America voted for Clinton you wouldn’t be in this pickle.
mcgoon said:
stumpy_seahorse said:do they have sausage sizzles at american voting booths?
Yes, but none are ever eaten, because they insist on dyeing them all red, white, and blue.
more appetising than green and gold sausages
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:So the lowest turnout in known history of US elections.
The media were telling us it was a huge turnout.
It isn’t the lowest turnout. It is actually more than last time.
Not in percentage terms which any sane person uses when doing historic comparisons of these things.
Um yes, even in percentage terms.
Also higher than 2000, 1996 and a bunch of other election years.
Witty Rejoinder said:
I wonder if the current electoral gerrymander will prevent a Democrat takeover of congress if Trump’s first two years are suitably chaotic?
To win the House, the Dems would probably need to win the House vote by about 7%.
Not impossible.
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
I wonder if the current electoral gerrymander will prevent a Democrat takeover of congress if Trump’s first two years are suitably chaotic?
To win the House, the Dems would probably need to win the House vote by about 7%.
Not impossible.
party_pants said:
mcgoon said:
stumpy_seahorse said:do they have sausage sizzles at american voting booths?
Yes, but none are ever eaten, because they insist on dyeing them all red, white, and blue.
more appetising than green and gold sausages
you may want to see a dr about that..
324,707,000 People > Trump
Witty Rejoinder said:
I wonder if the current electoral gerrymander will prevent a Democrat takeover of congress if Trump’s first two years are suitably chaotic?
in some ways the old-guard Republicans in the house would be a bigger stumbling block for Trump than if the Dems had control.
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:It isn’t the lowest turnout. It is actually more than last time.
Not in percentage terms which any sane person uses when doing historic comparisons of these things.
Um yes, even in percentage terms.
Also higher than 2000, 1996 and a bunch of other election years.
Nope, like I said lowest ever.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections
sibeen said:
dv said:
http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/11/aaron-sorkin-donald-trump-president-letter-daughterRead the Letter Aaron Sorkin Wrote His Daughter After Donald Trump Was Elected President
Look, it is a great letter, but:
First of all, we remember that we’re not alone. A hundred million people in America and a billion more around the world feel exactly the same way we do.
If a hundred million people in America voted for Clinton you wouldn’t be in this pickle.
In fairness some of the people who are worried about a Trump presidency might not be of voting age.
But yes 100 million seems high. Basically it appears that half of Americans couldn’t give a rat’s arse about any of it.
dv said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/11/aaron-sorkin-donald-trump-president-letter-daughterRead the Letter Aaron Sorkin Wrote His Daughter After Donald Trump Was Elected President
Look, it is a great letter, but:
First of all, we remember that we’re not alone. A hundred million people in America and a billion more around the world feel exactly the same way we do.
If a hundred million people in America voted for Clinton you wouldn’t be in this pickle.
In fairness some of the people who are worried about a Trump presidency might not be of voting age.
But yes 100 million seems high. Basically it appears that half of Americans couldn’t give a rat’s arse about any of it.
That’s quite a lot of people that don’t give a crap, no wonder they have problems.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:Not in percentage terms which any sane person uses when doing historic comparisons of these things.
Um yes, even in percentage terms.
Also higher than 2000, 1996 and a bunch of other election years.
Nope, like I said lowest ever.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections
Nnnnnnope. And fixed.
sibeen said:
dv said:
http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2016/11/aaron-sorkin-donald-trump-president-letter-daughterRead the Letter Aaron Sorkin Wrote His Daughter After Donald Trump Was Elected President
Look, it is a great letter, but:
First of all, we remember that we’re not alone. A hundred million people in America and a billion more around the world feel exactly the same way we do.
If a hundred million people in America voted for Clinton you wouldn’t be in this pickle.
OTOH his estimate of a billion worldwide who are worried about a Trump presidency might even be on the low side
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:Um yes, even in percentage terms.
Also higher than 2000, 1996 and a bunch of other election years.
Nope, like I said lowest ever.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections
Nnnnnnope. And fixed.
LOL, I forgot you could change Wiki.
However my next question to the honourable member is does he stand by his claim that the figures shown in the pie chart he published a very short time ago are accurate as he has attested to.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:Nope, like I said lowest ever.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections
Nnnnnnope. And fixed.
LOL, I forgot you could change Wiki.
However my next question to the honourable member is does he stand by his claim that the figures shown in the pie chart he published a very short time ago are accurate as he has attested to.
I can’t attest to the number of ineligible voters.
What I can tell you is that a) that % in the wiki table I just deleted (119 million) is lower than the number of ballots already accounted for (about 128 million) and there are still some yet to be received. There is still some uncertainty in how many more will come in.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:Nope, like I said lowest ever.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout_in_the_United_States_presidential_elections
Nnnnnnope. And fixed.
LOL, I forgot you could change Wiki.
However my next question to the honourable member is does he stand by his claim that the figures shown in the pie chart he published a very short time ago are accurate as he has attested to.
In the weeks and months ahead there is going to be analysis out the ying yang as the pundits try to figure out how they got everything so hopelessly wrong.
One clue would be if you sneer at the person who tells you they will vote for trump, eventually they will stop telling you until they are in the privacy of a polling booth.
dv said:
OTOH his estimate of a billion worldwide who are worried about a Trump presidency might even be on the low side
I hate the King of Saudi Arabia too, but there’s nothing I can do about either of them.
party_pants said:
dv said:OTOH his estimate of a billion worldwide who are worried about a Trump presidency might even be on the low side
I hate the King of Saudi Arabia too, but there’s nothing I can do about either of them.
nothing wrong with Salman
AwesomeO said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:Nnnnnnope. And fixed.
LOL, I forgot you could change Wiki.
However my next question to the honourable member is does he stand by his claim that the figures shown in the pie chart he published a very short time ago are accurate as he has attested to.
In the weeks and months ahead there is going to be analysis out the ying yang as the pundits try to figure out how they got everything so hopelessly wrong.
One clue would be if you sneer at the person who tells you they will vote for trump, eventually they will stop telling you until they are in the privacy of a polling booth.
Whizkid Harry Enten was somewhat dismissive of the idea of the “Shy Trumper Effect” because, in his words, the Trump supporters he knew were all very loud about it.
This was surprisingly poor thinking for a whizkid because it ignored the possibility that some of the people he knows are Trump supporters but he doesn’t know about it.
US pollsters got it wrong
it’s a set back for your nation…
Arts said:
party_pants said:
dv said:OTOH his estimate of a billion worldwide who are worried about a Trump presidency might even be on the low side
I hate the King of Saudi Arabia too, but there’s nothing I can do about either of them.
nothing wrong with Salman
aprt from the bad things.
I still hate him anyway, he has a silly beard.
party_pants said:
Arts said:
party_pants said:I hate the King of Saudi Arabia too, but there’s nothing I can do about either of them.
nothing wrong with Salman
aprt from the bad things.
I still hate him anyway, he has a silly beard.
The beard thing is a tradition I think.
The fact that there was misleading polling in the UK general election last year makes me think that this is not just about anti-establishment sentiments in the electorate (eg. Brexit and Trump’s win) but may in fact represent problems with polling methods that rely on land-lines.
CrazyNeutrino said:
party_pants said:
Arts said:nothing wrong with Salman
aprt from the bad things.
I still hate him anyway, he has a silly beard.
The beard thing is a tradition I think.
nearly all tradition is bunk
Supplementary question-:
Does the honourable member stand by his pie chart and his assertion that the numbers in it are accurate?
party_pants said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
party_pants said:aprt from the bad things.
I still hate him anyway, he has a silly beard.
The beard thing is a tradition I think.
nearly all tradition is bunk
Lots of traditional things in Saudi Arabia
Witty Rejoinder said:
The fact that there was misleading polling in the UK general election last year makes me think that this is not just about anti-establishment sentiments in the electorate (eg. Brexit and Trump’s win) but may in fact represent problems with polling methods that rely on land-lines.
I think there is unrecognised resentment amongst ordinary people to the free trade/globalisation agenda. That’s what I get out of both Brexit and Trump’s win.
all of this election debacle is just a distraction from the fact that Toblerone has cut out some triangles
Arts said:
all of this election debacle is just a distraction from the fact that Toblerone has cut out some triangles
It’s the first thing Trump is going to fix; don’t you worry about that.
Arts said:
all of this election debacle is just a distraction from the fact that Toblerone has cut out some triangles
It’s just a marketing ploy like the new Shapes/old Shapes thingee.
sibeen said:
Arts said:
all of this election debacle is just a distraction from the fact that Toblerone has cut out some triangles
It’s the first thing Trump is going to fix; don’t you worry about that.
so close to Christmas? tough gig
Arts said:
sibeen said:
Arts said:
all of this election debacle is just a distraction from the fact that Toblerone has cut out some triangles
It’s the first thing Trump is going to fix; don’t you worry about that.
so close to Christmas? tough gig
Tell them about the veal while getting your roadie to start the car.
Arts said:
all of this election debacle is just a distraction from the fact that Toblerone has cut out some triangles
I understand not the outrage over this. Toblerones are bunk.
Donald Trump’s team has removed the statement on his website to ban all Muslims from the US.
On the same night that millions of votes were pouring in for the real estate mogul turned politician, the page linking to his December statement regarding a temporary and complete Muslim has been removed.
The page now redirects to his a page encouraging voters to donate to his campaign.
more
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-president-election-muslim-ban-immigrants-website-statement-removed-a7408466.html
party_pants said:
Arts said:
all of this election debacle is just a distraction from the fact that Toblerone has cut out some triangles
I understand not the outrage over this. Toblerones are bunk.
if we let this go, the next thing you know the freddos won’t have arms, gummy bears will be faceless and the caramello koalas will be just caramel .. we can’t let these atrocities happen!
Arts said:
party_pants said:
Arts said:
all of this election debacle is just a distraction from the fact that Toblerone has cut out some triangles
I understand not the outrage over this. Toblerones are bunk.
if we let this go, the next thing you know the freddos won’t have arms, gummy bears will be faceless and the caramello koalas will be just caramel .. we can’t let these atrocities happen!
too much sugar in them for me.
shrug
sarahs mum said:
Donald Trump’s team has removed the statement on his website to ban all Muslims from the US.On the same night that millions of votes were pouring in for the real estate mogul turned politician, the page linking to his December statement regarding a temporary and complete Muslim has been removed.
The page now redirects to his a page encouraging voters to donate to his campaign.
more
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-president-election-muslim-ban-immigrants-website-statement-removed-a7408466.html
A small step, maybe more perhaps?
the next thing you know the freddos won’t have arms
as long as they still have four legs…
Selling out his extremist mates is likely to get him assassinated…
furious said:
- A small step, maybe more perhaps?
Selling out his extremist mates is likely to get him assassinated…
Enforcing restrictions on entry for citizens of specific countries would be one of the easiest policies Trump could adopt with little political blowback IMO.
furious said:
- A small step, maybe more perhaps?
Selling out his extremist mates is likely to get him assassinated…
It’s a big chance, Republican presidents are being shot at a rate six times higher than Democrat presidents.
He might survive one term but two terms………………..he’ll need to be lucky.
Witty Rejoinder said:
furious said:
- A small step, maybe more perhaps?
Selling out his extremist mates is likely to get him assassinated…
Enforcing restrictions on entry for citizens of specific countries would be one of the easiest policies Trump could adopt with little political blowback IMO.
Pretty sure that policy was adapted some time ago to restrictions on entry from specific countries.
Are we starting to see back-flips already?
party_pants said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
The fact that there was misleading polling in the UK general election last year makes me think that this is not just about anti-establishment sentiments in the electorate (eg. Brexit and Trump’s win) but may in fact represent problems with polling methods that rely on land-lines.
I think there is unrecognised resentment amongst ordinary people to the free trade/globalisation agenda. That’s what I get out of both Brexit and Trump’s win.
Yeah. That’s about it.
Witty Rejoinder said:
Arts said:
all of this election debacle is just a distraction from the fact that Toblerone has cut out some triangles
It’s just a marketing ploy like the new Shapes/old Shapes thingee.
The shapes of things before my eyes…
Overundersidewaysdown.
party_pants said:
Arts said:
party_pants said:I understand not the outrage over this. Toblerones are bunk.
if we let this go, the next thing you know the freddos won’t have arms, gummy bears will be faceless and the caramello koalas will be just caramel .. we can’t let these atrocities happen!
too much sugar in them for me.
shrug
there’ll be no one left to speak up for the diabetics if you don’t speak up now
Arts said:
party_pants said:
Arts said:if we let this go, the next thing you know the freddos won’t have arms, gummy bears will be faceless and the caramello koalas will be just caramel .. we can’t let these atrocities happen!
too much sugar in them for me.
shrug
there’ll be no one left to speak up for the diabetics if you don’t speak up now
You have a point.
Arts said:
party_pants said:
Arts said:if we let this go, the next thing you know the freddos won’t have arms, gummy bears will be faceless and the caramello koalas will be just caramel .. we can’t let these atrocities happen!
too much sugar in them for me.
shrug
there’ll be no one left to speak up for the diabetics if you don’t speak up now
we’ll all be dead by the time they come for us.
party_pants said:
Arts said:
party_pants said:too much sugar in them for me.
shrug
there’ll be no one left to speak up for the diabetics if you don’t speak up now
we’ll all be dead by the time they come for us.
I finally got an appoinment for a dermatologist. That will be 14 weeks after I started asking. I was lucky to grab a cancellation but as I told her, I may be over it by the time the appointment comes up in two weeks.
bump
sibeen said:
bump
go to bed.
Make it stop.
It cannot be stopped. We must let it burn itself out.
It just occurred to me that Groucho, Harpo, Chico, and Zeppo predicted Trump’s win, and how he intends to run the country, in 1933: "If you think this country’s bad off now, just wait ‘til I get through with it!"
For all the talk of the importance of identity politics in this election, Clinton only won 43% of the votes of white women, versus Trump on 53%.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-couldnt-win-over-white-women/
“READ: Donald Trump’s Advocate Interview Where He Defends Gays, Mexicans
“When he ran for president 15 years ago, the real estate mogul sang a different tune when it came to minorities. Read the entire Q&A from 2000 below.”
http://www.advocate.com/election/2015/9/28/read-donald-trumps-advocate-interview-where-he-defends-gays-mexicans
For anyone interested.
esselte said:
“READ: Donald Trump’s Advocate Interview Where He Defends Gays, Mexicans
“When he ran for president 15 years ago, the real estate mogul sang a different tune when it came to minorities. Read the entire Q&A from 2000 below.”
http://www.advocate.com/election/2015/9/28/read-donald-trumps-advocate-interview-where-he-defends-gays-mexicans
For anyone interested.
An optimist might hope that most of the stupid crap he has spouted in this campaign was merely tactical.
dv said:
esselte said:“READ: Donald Trump’s Advocate Interview Where He Defends Gays, Mexicans
But, will he defend Mexican gays?

I wonder if things would’ve been different if the Access Hollywood tape had been released about a week before the election.

dv said:
He’s more perspicacious than we might have thought.
mcgoon said:
dv said:
He’s more perspicacious than we might have thought.
yeah he sweats a lot
dv said:
mcgoon said:
dv said:
He’s more perspicacious than we might have thought.
yeah he sweats a lot
Old man smell as well I imagine
https://youtu.be/w3Ou5uFFn8Q
Really trying to avoid the splatter after this clown-car result, but sheesh….some people have NFI about socialism/universal healthcare/ LBGTQ people/science. We need a big, huge cleansing of the current population…like a flood.
kii said:
Really trying to avoid the splatter after this clown-car result, but sheesh….some people have NFI about socialism/universal healthcare/ LBGTQ people/science. We need a big, huge cleansing of the current population…like a flood.
Maybe most of its was all talk to get the votes and he won’t follow through, not sure how much of it wouldn’t be human rights violations, Australia really can’t condemn as we seem to worse with lots of it
Cymek said:
kii said:
Really trying to avoid the splatter after this clown-car result, but sheesh….some people have NFI about socialism/universal healthcare/ LBGTQ people/science. We need a big, huge cleansing of the current population…like a flood.
Maybe most of its was all talk to get the votes and he won’t follow through, not sure how much of it wouldn’t be human rights violations, Australia really can’t condemn as we seem to worse with lots of it
It seems that way, but his followers have taken it to heart and are being foul.
kii said:
Really trying to avoid the splatter after this clown-car result, but sheesh….some people have NFI about socialism/universal healthcare/ LBGTQ people/science. We need a big, huge cleansing of the current population…like a flood.
roffle…
so wishing death upon the people that we don’t agree with is the answer now??
perhaps instead of a ‘cleansing’ we could look to build inclusiveness thorough tolerance, understanding and education…
hmmmm… voter turnout lowest since 2000.. just over 55%
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
Really trying to avoid the splatter after this clown-car result, but sheesh….some people have NFI about socialism/universal healthcare/ LBGTQ people/science. We need a big, huge cleansing of the current population…like a flood.
roffle…
so wishing death upon the people that we don’t agree with is the answer now??
perhaps instead of a ‘cleansing’ we could look to build inclusiveness thorough tolerance, understanding and education…
That ship has sailed for lots of people
exit poll results
http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls/national/president
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
Really trying to avoid the splatter after this clown-car result, but sheesh….some people have NFI about socialism/universal healthcare/ LBGTQ people/science. We need a big, huge cleansing of the current population…like a flood.
roffle…
so wishing death upon the people that we don’t agree with is the answer now??
perhaps instead of a ‘cleansing’ we could look to build inclusiveness thorough tolerance, understanding and education…
You always take my posts so seriously, Doddles.
Have you seen a professional healthcare person about this?
diddly-squat said:
hmmmm… voter turnout lowest since 2000.. just over 55%
It’s still being counted, votes are still coming in.
diddly-squat said:
exit poll results
http://edition.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls/national/president
white women
kii said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
Really trying to avoid the splatter after this clown-car result, but sheesh….some people have NFI about socialism/universal healthcare/ LBGTQ people/science. We need a big, huge cleansing of the current population…like a flood.
roffle…
so wishing death upon the people that we don’t agree with is the answer now??
perhaps instead of a ‘cleansing’ we could look to build inclusiveness thorough tolerance, understanding and education…
You always take my posts so seriously, Doddles.
Have you seen a professional healthcare person about this?
no… I just find the notion that you suggest that some people are fearing for their lives because of hatred and intolerance brought about by a Trump Presidency – yet here you are ‘joking’ about how all the people with which you disagree should be ‘cleansed’ en masse.
just sayin’
dv said:
diddly-squat said:hmmmm… voter turnout lowest since 2000.. just over 55%
It’s still being counted, votes are still coming in.
One very vocal woman I know made a huge fuss about wanting to vote for Stein. Even started a closed group for her and her followers to talk in private….because, other people weren’t understanding “their” protest.
Today she posts that she didn’t vote.
hahahahaha…
Better yet, she has been posting links to suicide hotlines for LGBT people (which is great, very sad but….it’s needed) her recent ex is a trans man.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:hmmmm… voter turnout lowest since 2000.. just over 55%
It’s still being counted, votes are still coming in.
OK… but still… I don’t see it increasing radically..
point is, turnout was low compared to recent history…
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:roffle…
so wishing death upon the people that we don’t agree with is the answer now??
perhaps instead of a ‘cleansing’ we could look to build inclusiveness thorough tolerance, understanding and education…
You always take my posts so seriously, Doddles.
Have you seen a professional healthcare person about this?
no… I just find the notion that you suggest that some people are fearing for their lives because of hatred and intolerance brought about by a Trump Presidency – yet here you are ‘joking’ about how all the people with which you disagree should be ‘cleansed’ en masse.
just sayin’
Oh dear oh dear…..do you need a guide book to life, Doddly?
kii said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:You always take my posts so seriously, Doddles.
Have you seen a professional healthcare person about this?
no… I just find the notion that you suggest that some people are fearing for their lives because of hatred and intolerance brought about by a Trump Presidency – yet here you are ‘joking’ about how all the people with which you disagree should be ‘cleansed’ en masse.
just sayin’
Oh dear oh dear…..do you need a guide book to life, Doddly?
I’m not sure I understand what you mean…
Kii was pointing out that large numbers of Americans are hopefully misinformed, and despairing that it seems nothing can be done about it.
I think this is a common and understandable observation.
I like this one…
most important issue facing the country
foreign policy 60% (Hills) 35% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
immigration 35% (Hills) 64% (the Donald) 4% (no response)
economy 53% (Hills) 42% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
terrorism 39% (hills) 57% (The Donald) 4% (no response)
some pretty stark differences there…
Bubblecar said:
Kii was pointing out that large numbers of Americans are hopefully misinformed, and despairing that it seems nothing can be done about it.I think this is a common and understandable observation.
There you go! Mr Car understands.
Bubblecar said:
Kii was pointing out that large numbers of Americans are hopefully misinformed, and despairing that it seems nothing can be done about it.I think this is a common and understandable observation.
well nothing except that they be ‘cleansed’
did anyone click on my youtube post?
sarahs mum said:
did anyone click on my youtube post?
I did but decided not to watch it for now because I’ve had an overdose of US election :)
I’ll wait until I’ve had a cup of tea.
how bizarre is this…
of the people that were asked “is trump qualified to serve as president?”, 18% of the people that responded no, voted for trump anyway…
diddly-squat said:
how bizarre is this…
of the people that were asked “is trump qualified to serve as president?”, 18% of the people that responded no, voted for trump anyway…
They think “not being qualified” is an asset. They don’t trust “experts” and “professional politicians” etc.
Seems to me that the exit poll results largely suggest that the majority of people that don’t like, or don’t think that either candidate is fit for office have sided with Trump as a the least worst option…
diddly-squat said:
Seems to me that the exit poll results largely suggest that the majority of people that don’t like, or don’t think that either candidate is fit for office have sided with Trump as a the least worst option…
Always comes down to a giant douche or a turd sandwich
Guardian are really pumping the subscription and membership ads. They have more posters than ever but increasing numbers are hostile. I’m wondering if it’s a last bid to keep Comments open, or if they’re actually benefiting from the increased traffic. Most likely they have a lot more moderation to do with little extra money to pay for it.
diddly-squat said:
Seems to me that the exit poll results largely suggest that the majority of people that don’t like, or don’t think that either candidate is fit for office have sided with Trump as a the least worst option…
It’s quite disturbing that many people who said “I don’t trust Hillary” were then happy to trust a nightmarishly dishonest creep like Trump.
Bubblecar said:
diddly-squat said:how bizarre is this…
of the people that were asked “is trump qualified to serve as president?”, 18% of the people that responded no, voted for trump anyway…
They think “not being qualified” is an asset. They don’t trust “experts” and “professional politicians” etc.
Exactly. They were sick of more of the same which is what Hilary was offering. They have had more of the same, it’s not working for them.
kii said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:hmmmm… voter turnout lowest since 2000.. just over 55%
It’s still being counted, votes are still coming in.
One very vocal woman I know made a huge fuss about wanting to vote for Stein. Even started a closed group for her and her followers to talk in private….because, other people weren’t understanding “their” protest.
Today she posts that she didn’t vote.
hahahahaha…
Better yet, she has been posting links to suicide hotlines for LGBT people (which is great, very sad but….it’s needed) her recent ex is a trans man.
The thought processes of other people are sometimes baffling
the even more surprising thing is that 70% of all respondents agreed that Trump’s treatment of woman bothered them, yet 29% of this group voted for him anyway…
diddly-squat said:
I like this one…
most important issue facing the country
foreign policy 60% (Hills) 35% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
immigration 35% (Hills) 64% (the Donald) 4% (no response)
economy 53% (Hills) 42% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
terrorism 39% (hills) 57% (The Donald) 4% (no response)some pretty stark differences there…
How can a vote on the most important issue come to more than 100%?
And another thing:
Everyone (at least those speaking on ABC TV/Radio, and writing in the SMH) is going on about how far out the polls were, but how far were they? The last ones I saw ranged from about +6% to Clinton, to +5% to Trump, with the average being about +1% to Clinton.
So it seems to me (based on the total vote) they were pretty damned close.
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:hmmmm… voter turnout lowest since 2000.. just over 55%
It’s still being counted, votes are still coming in.
OK… but still… I don’t see it increasing radically..
point is, turnout was low compared to recent history…
I think it is going to end up about the same as 2012, which was 54.9%
kii said:
There you go! Mr Car understands.
Mr Car seems to think that he has the moral superiority to call a democratic result “incorrect”. Given what you have both said in this thread it’s little wonder you feel allied.
diddly-squat said:
I like this one…
most important issue facing the country
foreign policy 60% (Hills) 35% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
immigration 35% (Hills) 64% (the Donald) 4% (no response)
economy 53% (Hills) 42% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
terrorism 39% (hills) 57% (The Donald) 4% (no response)some pretty stark differences there…
Yeah … there’s been a lot of talk about how this election was about the economy, but most people thought Hillary would be better for the economy so (shrugs)
diddly-squat said:
how bizarre is this…
of the people that were asked “is trump qualified to serve as president?”, 18% of the people that responded no, voted for trump anyway…
Then again, pollsters were saying Hilary would romp it in so I am a bit wary of anything those numpties pull up in their numbers.
sarahs mum said:
did anyone click on my youtube post?
I missed it, please repost
Bubblecar said:
diddly-squat said:how bizarre is this…
of the people that were asked “is trump qualified to serve as president?”, 18% of the people that responded no, voted for trump anyway…
They think “not being qualified” is an asset. They don’t trust “experts” and “professional politicians” etc.
When I had my surgery I insisted they get someone from the cafeteria to do it, rather than an insider
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:I like this one…
most important issue facing the country
foreign policy 60% (Hills) 35% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
immigration 35% (Hills) 64% (the Donald) 4% (no response)
economy 53% (Hills) 42% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
terrorism 39% (hills) 57% (The Donald) 4% (no response)some pretty stark differences there…
How can a vote on the most important issue come to more than 100%?
And another thing:
Everyone (at least those speaking on ABC TV/Radio, and writing in the SMH) is going on about how far out the polls were, but how far were they? The last ones I saw ranged from about +6% to Clinton, to +5% to Trump, with the average being about +1% to Clinton.
So it seems to me (based on the total vote) they were pretty damned close.
rounding errors
This election reminded me of the Abbott/Rudd one where they both were really bad choices…
sarahs mum said:
https://youtu.be/w3Ou5uFFn8Q
bump.
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:I like this one…
most important issue facing the country
foreign policy 60% (Hills) 35% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
immigration 35% (Hills) 64% (the Donald) 4% (no response)
economy 53% (Hills) 42% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
terrorism 39% (hills) 57% (The Donald) 4% (no response)some pretty stark differences there…
How can a vote on the most important issue come to more than 100%?
You’re misunderstanding the stats. Of those who thought foreign policy was most important, 60% voted for Clinton etc
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
https://youtu.be/w3Ou5uFFn8Q
bump.
Oh.
I don’t like Russell Brand.
2/3 of all respondents believe the country is headed down the wrong track, of this group 70% voted for Trump…
more amusingly, 10% of the people that believe that the country is headed down right track voted for trump…
There’s a great photo of the WH staff looking pretty pissed off at today’s visit by the Orange shit.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
sarahs mum said:
https://youtu.be/w3Ou5uFFn8Q
bump.
Oh.
I don’t like Russell Brand.
sorry. but I think he has a point in that you can’t threaten people with awful lives that their lives will be awful if this or that.
ad = advertisement
add = +
pet peeve mode off.
:-)
Bubblecar said:
Kii was pointing out that large numbers of Americans are hopefully misinformed, and despairing that it seems nothing can be done about it.I think this is a common and understandable observation.
Hmm, just read what I posted. I meant “hopelessly” not hopefully :)
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:bump.
Oh.
I don’t like Russell Brand.
sorry. but I think he has a point in that you can’t threaten people with awful lives that their lives will be awful if this or that.
Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor. The idea that Trump’s support comes mainly from the struggling working class is crap. I think Russell’s point is bullshit.
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
Kii was pointing out that large numbers of Americans are hopefully misinformed, and despairing that it seems nothing can be done about it.I think this is a common and understandable observation.
Hmm, just read what I posted. I meant “hopelessly” not hopefully :)
I imagine many economies are still in the shitter and that won’t get any better for a decade or two
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
Kii was pointing out that large numbers of Americans are hopefully misinformed, and despairing that it seems nothing can be done about it.I think this is a common and understandable observation.
Hmm, just read what I posted. I meant “hopelessly” not hopefully :)
esselte said:
kii said:
There you go! Mr Car understands.
Mr Car seems to think that he has the moral superiority to call a democratic result “incorrect”. Given what you have both said in this thread it’s little wonder you feel allied.
Hello, esselte. Who are you?
dv said:
Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor.
Is this based on exit polls? URL?
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:Oh.
I don’t like Russell Brand.
sorry. but I think he has a point in that you can’t threaten people with awful lives that their lives will be awful if this or that.
Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor. The idea that Trump’s support comes mainly from the struggling working class is crap. I think Russell’s point is bullshit.
you are correct, the majority of people that earn under $50k per year voted for Hills, but it was the working middle class ($50k to $100k per year, a ground that makes up 30% of the population) that tipped the scales
dv said:
Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor. The idea that Trump’s support comes mainly from the struggling working class is crap. I think Russell’s point is bullshit.
Corbyn and Sanders made similarly inapt comments. It’s an unfortunate response from those quarters who’ve convinced themselves that those who vote for right-wing populists are actually helpless victims of capitalism who haven’t yet been “reached” by the left’s message of salvation.
Hi Kii,
I’m a privileged white cis-male heteronormative racist islamophobic sexist misogynistic arsehole. Who are you?
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor.
Is this based on exit polls?
yep
URL?
plenty, eg
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
esselte said:
Hi Kii,I’m a privileged white cis-male heteronormative racist islamophobic sexist misogynistic arsehole. Who are you?
bet you wear glasses as well
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:Oh.
I don’t like Russell Brand.
sorry. but I think he has a point in that you can’t threaten people with awful lives that their lives will be awful if this or that.
Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor. The idea that Trump’s support comes mainly from the struggling working class is crap. I think Russell’s point is bullshit.
I have no idea if Russell is full of shit but he sounds like he might be. I listened to one of his you youtubes and gave up very quickly. He strikes me as someone who is convinced they are smarter than they actually are.
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor.
Is this based on exit polls?
yep
URL?plenty, eg
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html
Thanks.
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:sorry. but I think he has a point in that you can’t threaten people with awful lives that their lives will be awful if this or that.
Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor. The idea that Trump’s support comes mainly from the struggling working class is crap. I think Russell’s point is bullshit.
you are correct, the majority of people that earn under $50k per year voted for Hills, but it was the working middle class ($50k to $100k per year, a ground that makes up 30% of the population) that tipped the scales
I was just talking to a middle-aged woman in southern california who just voted for the first time ever. She voted for Trump for change. I think she is going through a ‘brexit’ moment today.
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor. The idea that Trump’s support comes mainly from the struggling working class is crap. I think Russell’s point is bullshit.
Corbyn and Sanders made similarly inapt comments. It’s an unfortunate response from those quarters who’ve convinced themselves that those who vote for right-wing populists are actually helpless victims of capitalism who haven’t yet been “reached” by the left’s message of salvation.
exactly
Look at all the vitriol Trump and supporters pour on “political correctness”. In what possible way does PC disadvantage the poor?
Then again maybe Trump supporters are just pretending to be wealthy like he does…
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:I like this one…
most important issue facing the country
foreign policy 60% (Hills) 35% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
immigration 35% (Hills) 64% (the Donald) 4% (no response)
economy 53% (Hills) 42% (The Donald) 6% (no response)
terrorism 39% (hills) 57% (The Donald) 4% (no response)some pretty stark differences there…
How can a vote on the most important issue come to more than 100%?
You’re misunderstanding the stats. Of those who thought foreign policy was most important, 60% voted for Clinton etc
Ah, OK.
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:sorry. but I think he has a point in that you can’t threaten people with awful lives that their lives will be awful if this or that.
Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor. The idea that Trump’s support comes mainly from the struggling working class is crap. I think Russell’s point is bullshit.
you are correct, the majority of people that earn under $50k per year voted for Hills, but it was the working middle class ($50k to $100k per year, a ground that makes up 30% of the population) that tipped the scales
The majority of people in the categories from $100000-199000, $200000-249000, and $500000 and above also went for Trump
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor. The idea that Trump’s support comes mainly from the struggling working class is crap. I think Russell’s point is bullshit.
you are correct, the majority of people that earn under $50k per year voted for Hills, but it was the working middle class ($50k to $100k per year, a ground that makes up 30% of the population) that tipped the scales
I was just talking to a middle-aged woman in southern california who just voted for the first time ever. She voted for Trump for change. I think she is going through a ‘brexit’ moment today.
If ordinary people wanted to vote for a positive change, they should have just made sure they voted Democrat all the way down the ballot to flush out the fucking do-nothing conservative Congress.
Bubblecar said:
Look at all the vitriol Trump and supporters pour on “political correctness”. In what possible way does PC disadvantage the poor?
Political correctness is used to shut down debate on some of the concerns that poor people have. They complain that Mexican immigrants are making it more difficult for them to find work and feed their children, and they are shouted down by people like Hillary Clinton and her shills as “deplorables” and racists.
esselte said:
Hi Kii,I’m a privileged white cis-male heteronormative racist islamophobic sexist misogynistic arsehole. Who are you?
This evening? A witch’s cat.
kii said:
esselte said:
Hi Kii,I’m a privileged white cis-male heteronormative racist islamophobic sexist misogynistic arsehole. Who are you?
This evening? A witch’s cat.
I thought you looked familiar
White House staff today when Trump was there:

dv said:
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:you are correct, the majority of people that earn under $50k per year voted for Hills, but it was the working middle class ($50k to $100k per year, a ground that makes up 30% of the population) that tipped the scales
I was just talking to a middle-aged woman in southern california who just voted for the first time ever. She voted for Trump for change. I think she is going through a ‘brexit’ moment today.
If ordinary people wanted to vote for a positive change, they should have just made sure they voted Democrat all the way down the ballot to flush out the fucking do-nothing conservative Congress.
She just got on the bandwagon. I don’t there was much thought to it. (Or perhaps critical thought. I’m pretty sure she wouldn’t understand the term.)
esselte said:
Bubblecar said:
Look at all the vitriol Trump and supporters pour on “political correctness”. In what possible way does PC disadvantage the poor?
Political correctness is used to shut down debate on some of the concerns that poor people have. They complain that Mexican immigrants are making it more difficult for them to find work and feed their children, and they are shouted down by people like Hillary Clinton and her shills as “deplorables” and racists.
OTOH, PC also encourages anti-discrimination, inclusiveness, social mobility etc and is usually associated with the kind of politics that favours decent health care, education, social security and so on.
dv said:
kii said:
esselte said:
Hi Kii,I’m a privileged white cis-male heteronormative racist islamophobic sexist misogynistic arsehole. Who are you?
This evening? A witch’s cat.
I thought you looked familiar
That’s my boy!
dv said:
kii said:
esselte said:
Hi Kii,I’m a privileged white cis-male heteronormative racist islamophobic sexist misogynistic arsehole. Who are you?
This evening? A witch’s cat.
I thought you looked familiar
:)
kii said:
White House staff today when Trump was there:
Presumably they’re all facing the sack.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:Great, but the people who voted for Trump were wealthy and the people who voted for Clinton were poor. The idea that Trump’s support comes mainly from the struggling working class is crap. I think Russell’s point is bullshit.
you are correct, the majority of people that earn under $50k per year voted for Hills, but it was the working middle class ($50k to $100k per year, a ground that makes up 30% of the population) that tipped the scales
The majority of people in the categories from $100000-199000, $200000-249000, and $500000 and above also went for Trump
< $50k per year is roughly 1/3
$50 – $100k per year is roughly 1/3
> $100k roughly 1/3
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:you are correct, the majority of people that earn under $50k per year voted for Hills, but it was the working middle class ($50k to $100k per year, a ground that makes up 30% of the population) that tipped the scales
I was just talking to a middle-aged woman in southern california who just voted for the first time ever. She voted for Trump for change. I think she is going through a ‘brexit’ moment today.
If ordinary people wanted to vote for a positive change, they should have just made sure they voted Democrat all the way down the ballot to flush out the fucking do-nothing conservative Congress.
come now… the GOP will be able to do heaps now…
Bubblecar said:
Look at all the vitriol Trump and supporters pour on “political correctness”. In what possible way does PC disadvantage the poor?
Isn’t most of it tokenism so you look like you care by saying the right thing but acting differently when no one is watching
Bubblecar said:
kii said:
White House staff today when Trump was there:
Presumably they’re all facing the sack.
Yep. None of them are 10s.
kii said:
White House staff today when Trump was there:
that’s a “I’m about to lose my job look”
probs not the best photo to pose for…
AwesomeO said:
diddly-squat said:how bizarre is this…
of the people that were asked “is trump qualified to serve as president?”, 18% of the people that responded no, voted for trump anyway…
Then again, pollsters were saying Hilary would romp it in so I am a bit wary of anything those numpties pull up in their numbers.
A few did. A few said Trump would romp in. Most said it would be very close, with Clinton getting marginally more votes, which is exactly what happened.
Bubblecar said:
kii said:
White House staff today when Trump was there:
Presumably they’re all facing the sack.
I doubt they’d stay on even if invited to.
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:you are correct, the majority of people that earn under $50k per year voted for Hills, but it was the working middle class ($50k to $100k per year, a ground that makes up 30% of the population) that tipped the scales
The majority of people in the categories from $100000-199000, $200000-249000, and $500000 and above also went for Trump
< $50k per year is roughly 1/3
$50 – $100k per year is roughly 1/3
> $100k roughly 1/3
seems right
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:I was just talking to a middle-aged woman in southern california who just voted for the first time ever. She voted for Trump for change. I think she is going through a ‘brexit’ moment today.
If ordinary people wanted to vote for a positive change, they should have just made sure they voted Democrat all the way down the ballot to flush out the fucking do-nothing conservative Congress.
come now… the GOP will be able to do heaps now…
sadly, yes
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
kii said:
White House staff today when Trump was there:
!http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/5824a94f1800002d00503517.jpeg
Presumably they’re all facing the sack.
I doubt they’d stay on even if invited to.
They’d probably feel intimidated by Trump’s KGB bodyguards.
Bubblecar said:
kii said:
White House staff today when Trump was there:
Presumably they’re all facing the sack.
Yes they are, the tradition is practical jokes left for the transition team. Apparently Clintons transition team went a bit beyond fun tomfoolery.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:The majority of people in the categories from $100000-199000, $200000-249000, and $500000 and above also went for Trump
< $50k per year is roughly 1/3
$50 – $100k per year is roughly 1/3
> $100k roughly 1/3seems right
yep and the majority of the top 2/3 voted for The Donald
Bubblecar said:
OTOH, PC also encourages anti-discrimination, inclusiveness, social mobility etc and is usually associated with the kind of politics that favours decent health care, education, social security and so on.
That is true. But there is a social movement of moral busybodies at work in western societies who are using people’s better natures against them (“you don’t want to be a racist do you, so shut up about Mexicans”) to implement changes to democratic environments both on a cultural and a legislative levels which are a direct attack against personal liberty. These people have been hugely set back by Clinton’s loss, but they are still there and as long as they continue to weaponize political correctness we need to decide what is more important to the health and longevity of our democratic societies.
When people like you stop assuming the moral authority and start listening to people who disagree with you, PC will have been de-weaponized and we can all get back to the job of trying to make the world a better place.
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
Bubblecar said:Presumably they’re all facing the sack.
I doubt they’d stay on even if invited to.
They’d probably feel intimidated by Trump’s KGB bodyguards.
And the Melania robot.
What was that programme called?
>When people like you stop assuming the moral authority and start listening to people who disagree with you
I think you probably need to hear some of kii’s accounts of what Trump voters are actually saying.
PC also takes away power from those they claim to help as they make decisions on their behalf often without actually speaking to them and assuming stereotypical behaviour from those same people
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:< $50k per year is roughly 1/3
$50 – $100k per year is roughly 1/3
> $100k roughly 1/3seems right
yep and the majority of the top 2/3 voted for The Donald
Yeah I know … I just said that…
This show – My Living Doll:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ShixDbF_js
esselte said:
Bubblecar said:
OTOH, PC also encourages anti-discrimination, inclusiveness, social mobility etc and is usually associated with the kind of politics that favours decent health care, education, social security and so on.
That is true. But there is a social movement of moral busybodies at work in western societies
Yeah I know … that’s the main reason there has been social progress in the last 100 years. Good, isn’t it?
Bubblecar said:
>When people like you stop assuming the moral authority and start listening to people who disagree with youI think you probably need to hear some of kii’s accounts of what Trump voters are actually saying.
yep… right up there with the death threats she’s making…
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:seems right
yep and the majority of the top 2/3 voted for The Donald
Yeah I know … I just said that…
in fairness.. I just said it, you said it earlier…
kii said:
This show – My Living Doll:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ShixDbF_js
I thought you may have meant Stepford Wives.
But DJT likes them young so maybe “Small Wonder”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTTc8KpHsSg
Bubblecar said:
>When people like you stop assuming the moral authority and start listening to people who disagree with you
I think you probably need to hear some of kii’s accounts of what Trump voters are actually saying.
I have. What you need to understand about me is that whilst I have no doubt such things are taking place and I very much personally find that kind of hatred to be repugnant, I think there are more important things at stake right now and so you are not able to shame me for any perceived callous indifference I might appear to have towards the unfortunate people kii has mentioned. I do not concede the moral authority to you. Do you understand?
diddly-squat said:
Bubblecar said:
>When people like you stop assuming the moral authority and start listening to people who disagree with youI think you probably need to hear some of kii’s accounts of what Trump voters are actually saying.
yep… right up there with the death threats she’s making…
Fuck off, Doodly.
kii said:
This show – My Living Doll:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ShixDbF_js
dim recollections..
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:yep and the majority of the top 2/3 voted for The Donald
Yeah I know … I just said that…
in fairness.. I just said it, you said it earlier…
Still pretty recent on a geological timescale
esselte said:
When people like you stop assuming the moral authority and start listening to people who disagree with you, PC will have been de-weaponized and we can all get back to the job of trying to make the world a better place.
I’m glad you listen with such an open mind to people who you disagree with.
The term “PC” is used by people who feel their positions of privilege threatened, so they can dismiss arguments in favor of progressive action without having to debate them.
And that’s all it is.
dv said:
Yeah I know … that’s the main reason there has been social progress in the last 100 years. Good, isn’t it?
Good?
At NYU, students demanded that “within the NYU 2031 Plan, have guaranteed that an entire floor of the mixed use building in the Southern Superblock plan be entirely dedicated to Students of Color, and another for Queer Students on campus.”
http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2016/01/10/black-students-demand-segregation-now-segregation-tomorrow-segregation-forever/
No, I don’t support Racial Segregation, even if it is predicated on the idea that blacks have it a lot tougher than whites and so need extra molly-coddling.
No, it’s not good!
kii said:
diddly-squat said:
Bubblecar said:
>When people like you stop assuming the moral authority and start listening to people who disagree with youI think you probably need to hear some of kii’s accounts of what Trump voters are actually saying.
yep… right up there with the death threats she’s making…
Fuck off, Doodly.
it was you that said it, not me…
I just don’t see how it’s ok for you to complain about one thing, but then do exactly the same thing yourself… there’s a word for that…
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:Yeah I know … I just said that…
in fairness.. I just said it, you said it earlier…
Still pretty recent on a geological timescale
speaking for geological timescales… go coal…
esselte said:
dv said:
Yeah I know … that’s the main reason there has been social progress in the last 100 years. Good, isn’t it?
Good?
Yeah, you know … the opposite of bad? How things have improved socially in the last 100 years? You agree, right?
Is it time for Diddles’ nap?
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:in fairness.. I just said it, you said it earlier…
Still pretty recent on a geological timescale
speaking for geological timescales… go coal…
Srsly though … the coal thing may have been part of the reason for Trump’s success in Ohio and Pennsylvania.
esselte said:
Bubblecar said:
>When people like you stop assuming the moral authority and start listening to people who disagree with you
I think you probably need to hear some of kii’s accounts of what Trump voters are actually saying.
I have. What you need to understand about me is that whilst I have no doubt such things are taking place and I very much personally find that kind of hatred to be repugnant, I think there are more important things at stake right now and so you are not able to shame me for any perceived callous indifference I might appear to have towards the unfortunate people kii has mentioned. I do not concede the moral authority to you. Do you understand?
I have a headache.
dv said:
Yeah, you know … the opposite of bad? How things have improved socially in the last 100 years? You agree, right?
Yes, I agree. And now there is a bunch of moral busybodies etc… who are subverting that good and coming up with nonsense like re-introducing racial segregation in the classrooms of America. That’s bad, right?
esselte said:
dv said:
Yeah, you know … the opposite of bad? How things have improved socially in the last 100 years? You agree, right?
Yes, I agree
YAY!
The streak is over. For the first time in its 148 years of existence, Elliott County, Kentucky, failed to vote for the Democratic candidate in a presidential election. Based on current vote counts, Trump will finish with 70 percent of the vote, a huge swing from the 47 percent that Romney received in a narrow 2012 loss.
Elliott County is more than 95 percent white, and there were no obvious reasons for Democratic strength among its 8,000 or so residents in recent years. So it makes sense that when the streak finally broke, it broke hard. Not only did Elliott vote for Trump, but it did so by a greater share than the state of Kentucky did overall. Its 23-point swing from 2012 is among the largest of any county in the nation.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/a-kentucky-county-ended-its-historic-democratic-streak-to-vote-for-trump/
kii said:
Is it time for Diddles’ nap?
why’s that? because I called you out on speaking hatefully?
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:Still pretty recent on a geological timescale
speaking for geological timescales… go coal…
Srsly though … the coal thing may have been part of the reason for Trump’s success in Ohio and Pennsylvania.
That speech he gave in Penn.. the I will reopen the cola mines. I will make bigger coal mines..one
The crowd did like it.
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
Is it time for Diddles’ nap?
why’s that? because I called you out on speaking hatefully?
Do you like the green blanky or the yellow one?
http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2016/11/10/after_brexit_tolerant_britons_adopted_a_simple_symbol_of_solidarity_we_should.html
interesting read…
the anti abortion thing is simply something I can’t seem to get my head around…
kii said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:Is it time for Diddles’ nap?
why’s that? because I called you out on speaking hatefully?
Do you like the green blanky or the yellow one?
it’s simple, just take responsibility for what you say and don’t project onto others what you’re not prepared to do yourself…
dv said:
YAY!
Lol. I think you only hear/read that part of my reply you wanted to…
Keep covering your ears and going “lalalala” and then wonder next time round why your educated and well researched analyses keep failing to predict reality.
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:why’s that? because I called you out on speaking hatefully?
Do you like the green blanky or the yellow one?
it’s simple, just take responsibility for what you say and don’t project onto others what you’re not prepared to do yourself…
It’s your problem that you invented.
I think you need the green blanky today. You seem stressed.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:speaking for geological timescales… go coal…
Srsly though … the coal thing may have been part of the reason for Trump’s success in Ohio and Pennsylvania.
That speech he gave in Penn.. the I will reopen the cola mines.
Along with the new Mentos factories, this could be a great source of energy
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:Still pretty recent on a geological timescale
speaking for geological timescales… go coal…
Srsly though … the coal thing may have been part of the reason for Trump’s success in Ohio and Pennsylvania.
Pity about the future of coal then.
esselte said:
dv said:
Yeah, you know … the opposite of bad? How things have improved socially in the last 100 years? You agree, right?
Yes, I agree. And now there is a bunch of moral busybodies etc… who are subverting that good and coming up with nonsense like re-introducing racial segregation in the classrooms of America. That’s bad, right?
I think there’s a bit of a retreat from some aspects of globalism, a readjustment happening. Fine tuning of democracy, what the state does, the nation state. Private capital can make (many) governments seem small, that has its own problems, and capital wants to move around across borders like the air people breathe. Media similarly wants to hop borders as if the air people breathe. Global comm’s sort of contribute.
I see a distortion, that the world is seen as smaller, there’s a type of compression, an economy of perspective maybe.
The world seeming smaller is not all good IMO. The states and various alliances encourage this. Some do. America’s not all bad this way. Australia’s not all bad this way. But there are forces within that incline some distortion.
At the end of the day it maybe a parochial view that keeps the world from seeming small, and collapsing.
It’d be a weird world (and maybe’s trending so) if people thought what ought be of the world (the big picture) was for their entertainment. Like Trump’s entertainment. Malcolm here’s entertainment.
I think political figures have become weirdly entertainment. I don’t buy into the excesses of normal through abnormalizing, it’s a bit grade 3.
I think it’s a greediness and grasping than inclines a view of the world as if it were smaller. I’m not sure perceiving the world as smaller is adequate.
It’s a big world, and people are fortunate most of is not what it is not from human designs, human thought – what minds do.
There’s a we contagion out there, a commonly internalized device deployed by media, that has people shrinking the world, compressing it, advancing the territory of reality as social construction.
A hoodoo art.
The Rev Dodgson said:
The term “PC” is used by people who feel their positions of privilege threatened, so they can dismiss arguments in favor of progressive action without having to debate them.
Hey, I already admitted to being a privileged white arsehole in this very thread.
Attempting to shame me in front of everyone in to changing my mind is not a viable tactic for you.
kii said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:Do you like the green blanky or the yellow one?
it’s simple, just take responsibility for what you say and don’t project onto others what you’re not prepared to do yourself…
Nope.It’s your problem that you invented.
I think you need the green blanky today. You seem stressed.
With you leaving the USA and living with d-s under his stairs you need to get along better especially if you want more than fish heads to eat
esselte said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
The term “PC” is used by people who feel their positions of privilege threatened, so they can dismiss arguments in favor of progressive action without having to debate them.
Hey, I already admitted to being a privileged white arsehole in this very thread.
That actually raised a smile
esselte said:
Attempting to shame me in front of everyone in to changing my mind is not a viable tactic for you.
I’m not doing anything of the sort.
I’m just saying how I think the term “PC” is usually used, with a moderate degree of exaggeration.
Allowing people to have differing opinions works both ways you know.
The Rev Dodgson said:
I’m not doing anything of the sort.I’m just saying how I think the term “PC” is usually used, with a moderate degree of exaggeration.
Allowing people to have differing opinions works both ways you know.
OK, fair points. I apologize for misrepresenting you. I may be a little riled up. You can not know the burden of fighting against people whom you mostly agree with… (sighs)! ;)
Cymek said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:it’s simple, just take responsibility for what you say and don’t project onto others what you’re not prepared to do yourself…
Nope.It’s your problem that you invented.
I think you need the green blanky today. You seem stressed.
With you leaving the USA and living with d-s under his stairs you need to get along better especially if you want more than fish heads to eat
roffle…
Trump did well by tapping into people’s anger, fears and desires, and exploiting them in his campaign. But now he has unexpectedly won, and instead of being able to go on being outraged and inflammatory, he will have to act on doing something for all those angry and scared people, as well as all the average joes.
As Tony Abbott found, it’s one thing to whip people up with your tough talk, to sneer at different belief systems, to beat your chest…… it’s a whole different thing when you need to step up and find a way to carefully and sensibly manage a country.
We live in interesting times.
Cymek said:
kii said:
diddly-squat said:it’s simple, just take responsibility for what you say and don’t project onto others what you’re not prepared to do yourself…
Nope.It’s your problem that you invented.
I think you need the green blanky today. You seem stressed.
With you leaving the USA and living with d-s under his stairs you need to get along better especially if you want more than fish heads to eat
Yeah, nope. I have far better options that don’t involve QLD and bouillabaisse.
ruby said:
Trump did well by tapping into people’s anger, fears and desires, and exploiting them in his campaign. But now he has unexpectedly won, and instead of being able to go on being outraged and inflammatory, he will have to act on doing something for all those angry and scared people, as well as all the average joes.As Tony Abbott found, it’s one thing to whip people up with your tough talk, to sneer at different belief systems, to beat your chest…… it’s a whole different thing when you need to step up and find a way to carefully and sensibly manage a country.
We live in interesting times.
Trump might default to a closed door Presidency
Like Tony Abbott’s closed door approach with aides holding the keys and being selective who to let in.
CrazyNeutrino said:
ruby said:
Trump did well by tapping into people’s anger, fears and desires, and exploiting them in his campaign. But now he has unexpectedly won, and instead of being able to go on being outraged and inflammatory, he will have to act on doing something for all those angry and scared people, as well as all the average joes.As Tony Abbott found, it’s one thing to whip people up with your tough talk, to sneer at different belief systems, to beat your chest…… it’s a whole different thing when you need to step up and find a way to carefully and sensibly manage a country.
We live in interesting times.
Trump might default to a closed door Presidency
Like Tony Abbott’s closed door approach with aides holding the keys and being selective who to let in.
I can’t wait for the first sex scandal.
esselte said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
I’m not doing anything of the sort.I’m just saying how I think the term “PC” is usually used, with a moderate degree of exaggeration.
Allowing people to have differing opinions works both ways you know.
OK, fair points. I apologize for misrepresenting you. I may be a little riled up. You can not know the burden of fighting against people whom you mostly agree with… (sighs)! ;)
No problem.
FWIW, I agree that many cases of “racial discrimination” contain significant degrees of class discrimination, and failing to recognise this, or even talk about it, helps no-one.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Most unlikely. He’s demonstrably and consistently a “look at me – I’m a figjam” type
ruby said:
Trump did well by tapping into people’s anger, fears and desires, and exploiting them in his campaign. But now he has unexpectedly won, and instead of being able to go on being outraged and inflammatory, he will have to act on doing something for all those angry and scared people, as well as all the average joes.As Tony Abbott found, it’s one thing to whip people up with your tough talk, to sneer at different belief systems, to beat your chest…… it’s a whole different thing when you need to step up and find a way to carefully and sensibly manage a country.
We live in interesting times.
Trump might default to a closed door Presidency
Like Tony Abbott’s closed door approach with aides holding the keys and being selective who to let in.
>../cut/….Trump did well by tapping into people’s anger, fears and desires…/cut…
or, seen from the angle of repession (if i’m allowed to utter the word) he made it alright to have and express anger, fears and desires, and presumably more.
Michael V said:
Most unlikely. He’s demonstrably and consistently a “look at me – I’m a figjam” type
Hopefully he’ll just swan around for the cameras, going to functions etc and pretending to be president, while more competent people actually run the country.
Michael V said:
Most unlikely. He’s demonstrably and consistently a “look at me – I’m a figjam” type
That’s another reason Trump was my preference to win. His ego will hold him accountable to the American people, he won’t like doing things which will make him unpopular at home. Had Clinton won, she would have felt accountable to no-one.
esselte said:
Michael V said:
Most unlikely. He’s demonstrably and consistently a “look at me – I’m a figjam” type
That’s another reason Trump was my preference to win. His ego will hold him accountable to the American people, he won’t like doing things which will make him unpopular at home. Had Clinton won, she would have felt accountable to no-one.
OTOH, Trump is endlessly full of shit and a compulsive and shameless liar. He’s happy to lie his way out of anything and doesn’t actually care whether anyone believes him.
esselte said:
Michael V said:
Most unlikely. He’s demonstrably and consistently a “look at me – I’m a figjam” type
His ego will hold him accountable to the American people, he won’t like doing things which will make him unpopular at home.
What the fuck?
Esselte … Trump, through his actions, has made himself the most unpopular president-elect in history. Only 37% of American adults have a favorable view of him. Most Americans, including a lot of registered Republicans, consider him to be unqualified for the presidency.
transition said:
>../cut/….Trump did well by tapping into people’s anger, fears and desires…/cut…or, seen from the angle of repession (if i’m allowed to utter the word) he made it alright to have and express anger, fears and desires, and presumably more.
ruby said:
transition said:
>../cut/….Trump did well by tapping into people’s anger, fears and desires…/cut…or, seen from the angle of repession (if i’m allowed to utter the word) he made it alright to have and express anger, fears and desires, and presumably more.
….seen from the angle of repression. Whose repression?
Wealthy, middle-class white heterosexual men.
esselte said:
Michael V said:
Most unlikely. He’s demonstrably and consistently a “look at me – I’m a figjam” type
That’s another reason Trump was my preference to win. His ego will hold him accountable to the American people, he won’t like doing things which will make him unpopular at home. Had Clinton won, she would have felt accountable to no-one.
Oh, bullshit.
dv said:
esselte said:
Michael V said:
Most unlikely. He’s demonstrably and consistently a “look at me – I’m a figjam” type
His ego will hold him accountable to the American people, he won’t like doing things which will make him unpopular at home.
What the fuck?
Esselte … Trump, through his actions, has made himself the most unpopular president-elect in history. Only 37% of American adults have a favorable view of him. Most Americans, including a lot of registered Republicans, consider him to be unqualified for the presidency.
Yes. I took the comment to mean “unpopular with those who voted for him”, but even a good number of those are probably not exactly enchanted with the man.
furious said:
- Hopefully he’ll just swan around for the cameras, going to functions etc and pretending to be president, while more competent people actually run the country.
That’s what us females want…..Pence :(
ruby said:
transition said:
>../cut/….Trump did well by tapping into people’s anger, fears and desires…/cut…or, seen from the angle of repession (if i’m allowed to utter the word) he made it alright to have and express anger, fears and desires, and presumably more.
….seen from the angle of repression. Whose repression?
is there human that doesn’t sublimate.
dv said:
ruby said:
transition said:
>../cut/….Trump did well by tapping into people’s anger, fears and desires…/cut…or, seen from the angle of repession (if i’m allowed to utter the word) he made it alright to have and express anger, fears and desires, and presumably more.
….seen from the angle of repression. Whose repression?Wealthy, middle-class white heterosexual men.
Whereas anyone other than white, middle-class white heterosexual men have to express nothing about their own repression.
i’d think a a lot of ideology works in the territory of sublimation
http://truthfeed.com/fact-check-trump-vs-clinton-battle-of-the-rallies-heres-the-shocking-attendance-numbers/19536/
“Through August 25th, Trump has held 29 campaign events in August with an estimated 168,000 participants. Clinton on the other hand has held only 11 campaign events attended by an estimated paltry 10,000.
“Trump averages 5,800 people per event in August while Clinton averages less than 1,000.
“Overall, month to date, Trump held nearly 3 times the number of events than that of Hillary Clinton and 16 times the number of participants. Clinton held 5 of her 11 events in high school gyms which in many cases were half empty while Trump held his events in arenas and other large facilities with at least 7 of his events (Columbus, Harrisburg, Ashburn, Wilmington, Abingdon, West Bend, and Akron) having reported overflow crowds.”
Statistics on a page would be far less meaningful to Trump than thousands of people fist pumping and chanting his name in unison.
esselte said:
http://truthfeed.com/fact-check-trump-vs-clinton-battle-of-the-rallies-heres-the-shocking-attendance-numbers/19536/“Through August 25th, Trump has held 29 campaign events in August with an estimated 168,000 participants. Clinton on the other hand has held only 11 campaign events attended by an estimated paltry 10,000.
“Trump averages 5,800 people per event in August while Clinton averages less than 1,000.
“Overall, month to date, Trump held nearly 3 times the number of events than that of Hillary Clinton and 16 times the number of participants. Clinton held 5 of her 11 events in high school gyms which in many cases were half empty while Trump held his events in arenas and other large facilities with at least 7 of his events (Columbus, Harrisburg, Ashburn, Wilmington, Abingdon, West Bend, and Akron) having reported overflow crowds.”
Statistics on a page would be far less meaningful to Trump than thousands of people fist pumping and chanting his name in unison.
Just reinforces what a hopelessly inadequate and self-obsessed moron he really is.
ruby said:
dv said:
ruby said:….seen from the angle of repression. Whose repression?
Wealthy, middle-class white heterosexual men.
Whereas anyone other than white, middle-class white heterosexual men have to express nothing about their own repression.
No. If they did it would be PC. Poor minorities are “elites” for some reason.
esselte said:
http://truthfeed.com/fact-check-trump-vs-clinton-battle-of-the-rallies-heres-the-shocking-attendance-numbers/19536/“Through August 25th, Trump has held 29 campaign events in August with an estimated 168,000 participants. Clinton on the other hand has held only 11 campaign events attended by an estimated paltry 10,000.
“Trump averages 5,800 people per event in August while Clinton averages less than 1,000.
“Overall, month to date, Trump held nearly 3 times the number of events than that of Hillary Clinton and 16 times the number of participants. Clinton held 5 of her 11 events in high school gyms which in many cases were half empty while Trump held his events in arenas and other large facilities with at least 7 of his events (Columbus, Harrisburg, Ashburn, Wilmington, Abingdon, West Bend, and Akron) having reported overflow crowds.”
Statistics on a page would be far less meaningful to Trump than thousands of people fist pumping and chanting his name in unison.
Kanye West gets even bigger crowds. Perhaps he should be president.
dv said:
ruby said:
dv said:Wealthy, middle-class white heterosexual men.
Whereas anyone other than white, middle-class white heterosexual men have to express nothing about their own repression.
No. If they did it would be PC. Poor minorities are “elites” for some reason.
dv said:
esselte said:
http://truthfeed.com/fact-check-trump-vs-clinton-battle-of-the-rallies-heres-the-shocking-attendance-numbers/19536/“Through August 25th, Trump has held 29 campaign events in August with an estimated 168,000 participants. Clinton on the other hand has held only 11 campaign events attended by an estimated paltry 10,000.
“Trump averages 5,800 people per event in August while Clinton averages less than 1,000.
“Overall, month to date, Trump held nearly 3 times the number of events than that of Hillary Clinton and 16 times the number of participants. Clinton held 5 of her 11 events in high school gyms which in many cases were half empty while Trump held his events in arenas and other large facilities with at least 7 of his events (Columbus, Harrisburg, Ashburn, Wilmington, Abingdon, West Bend, and Akron) having reported overflow crowds.”
Statistics on a page would be far less meaningful to Trump than thousands of people fist pumping and chanting his name in unison.
Kanye West gets even bigger crowds. Perhaps he should be president.
“Random US Citizen chosen by Lottery” on the ballot would likely have resulted in a better President than either of the candidates. I’m down for some Kanye!
ruby said:
dv said:
esselte said:
http://truthfeed.com/fact-check-trump-vs-clinton-battle-of-the-rallies-heres-the-shocking-attendance-numbers/19536/“Through August 25th, Trump has held 29 campaign events in August with an estimated 168,000 participants. Clinton on the other hand has held only 11 campaign events attended by an estimated paltry 10,000.
“Trump averages 5,800 people per event in August while Clinton averages less than 1,000.
“Overall, month to date, Trump held nearly 3 times the number of events than that of Hillary Clinton and 16 times the number of participants. Clinton held 5 of her 11 events in high school gyms which in many cases were half empty while Trump held his events in arenas and other large facilities with at least 7 of his events (Columbus, Harrisburg, Ashburn, Wilmington, Abingdon, West Bend, and Akron) having reported overflow crowds.”
Statistics on a page would be far less meaningful to Trump than thousands of people fist pumping and chanting his name in unison.
Kanye West gets even bigger crowds. Perhaps he should be president.
I had a horrible thought this morning, about when a woman will be elected president of the USA. Probably going to be a Kardashian.
Well it won’t happen in our lifetimes so don’t worry about it.
esselte said:
http://truthfeed.com/fact-check-trump-vs-clinton-battle-of-the-rallies-heres-the-shocking-attendance-numbers/19536/“Through August 25th, Trump has held 29 campaign events in August with an estimated 168,000 participants. Clinton on the other hand has held only 11 campaign events attended by an estimated paltry 10,000.
“Trump averages 5,800 people per event in August while Clinton averages less than 1,000.
“Overall, month to date, Trump held nearly 3 times the number of events than that of Hillary Clinton and 16 times the number of participants. Clinton held 5 of her 11 events in high school gyms which in many cases were half empty while Trump held his events in arenas and other large facilities with at least 7 of his events (Columbus, Harrisburg, Ashburn, Wilmington, Abingdon, West Bend, and Akron) having reported overflow crowds.”
Statistics on a page would be far less meaningful to Trump than thousands of people fist pumping and chanting his name in unison.
Plus his wife is beautiful.
I mean that’s important…right?
And his daughter, don’t get him started on his daughter…
furious said:
- Plus his wife is beautiful.
And his daughter, don’t get him started on his daughter…
Not everyone is manipulated by goods looks, charisma and/or over the top yammering sphincterness, some of us actually distrust those attributes
kii said:
esselte said:
http://truthfeed.com/fact-check-trump-vs-clinton-battle-of-the-rallies-heres-the-shocking-attendance-numbers/19536/“Through August 25th, Trump has held 29 campaign events in August with an estimated 168,000 participants. Clinton on the other hand has held only 11 campaign events attended by an estimated paltry 10,000.
“Trump averages 5,800 people per event in August while Clinton averages less than 1,000.
“Overall, month to date, Trump held nearly 3 times the number of events than that of Hillary Clinton and 16 times the number of participants. Clinton held 5 of her 11 events in high school gyms which in many cases were half empty while Trump held his events in arenas and other large facilities with at least 7 of his events (Columbus, Harrisburg, Ashburn, Wilmington, Abingdon, West Bend, and Akron) having reported overflow crowds.”
Statistics on a page would be far less meaningful to Trump than thousands of people fist pumping and chanting his name in unison.
Plus his wife is beautiful.
I mean that’s important…right?
transition said:
I’m not sublime.
ruby said:
transition said:
>../cut/….Trump did well by tapping into people’s anger, fears and desires…/cut…or, seen from the angle of repession (if i’m allowed to utter the word) he made it alright to have and express anger, fears and desires, and presumably more.
….seen from the angle of repression. Whose repression?is there human that doesn’t sublimate.
Are you ridiculous?
Michael V said:
transition said:I’m not sublime.
ruby said:….seen from the angle of repression. Whose repression?
is there human that doesn’t sublimate.
furious said:
- I’m not sublime.
Are you ridiculous?
Tamb said:
Michael V said:
transition said:I’m not sublime.is there human that doesn’t sublimate.
Cymek said:
furious said:
- Plus his wife is beautiful.
And his daughter, don’t get him started on his daughter…
Not everyone is manipulated by goods looks, charisma and/or over the top yammering sphincterness, some of us actually distrust those attributes
I’m not influenced by looks, in fact I don’t really trust people who are known for their “good looks “.

kii said:
Cymek said:
furious said:
- Plus his wife is beautiful.
And his daughter, don’t get him started on his daughter…
Not everyone is manipulated by goods looks, charisma and/or over the top yammering sphincterness, some of us actually distrust those attributes
I’m not influenced by looks, in fact I don’t really trust people who are known for their “good looks “.
so you are influenced by looks…
furious said:
- Oops, wrong button
![]()
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
Cymek said:Not everyone is manipulated by goods looks, charisma and/or over the top yammering sphincterness, some of us actually distrust those attributes
I’m not influenced by looks, in fact I don’t really trust people who are known for their “good looks “.
so you are influenced by looks…
furious said:
Likely.
- I’m not sublime.
Are you ridiculous?
Tamb said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:I’m not influenced by looks, in fact I don’t really trust people who are known for their “good looks “.
so you are influenced by looks…
I am to an extent. Not keen on people with downturned mouths. They generally got that way from being miserable buggers.

ChrispenEvan said:
Tamb said:
diddly-squat said:so you are influenced by looks…
I am to an extent. Not keen on people with downturned mouths. They generally got that way from being miserable buggers.!http://i.imgur.com/DKUR9Tk.png
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83 and was probably thinking of retirement but someone’s got to keep her alive and working for another 4 years. Or at the very least another 2.
dv said:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83 and was probably thinking of retirement but someone’s got to keep her alive and working for another 4 years. Or at the very least another 2.
Ring up the Palace and see if they can borrow one of their doctors, they’re experts in this field.
https://twitter.com/i/moments/796417517157830656
Has there ever been a potus that has held no public office, political or administrative, and never been in the military.
I think Eisenhower only had a military background.
dv said:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83 and was probably thinking of retirement but someone’s got to keep her alive and working for another 4 years. Or at the very least another 2.
If she’d been fair dinkum she would have resigned when the democrats had control of the house, but no, she held on and now everyone is shitting themselves.
sibeen said:
dv said:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83 and was probably thinking of retirement but someone’s got to keep her alive and working for another 4 years. Or at the very least another 2.
If she’d been fair dinkum she would have resigned when the democrats had control of the house, but no, she held on and now everyone is shitting themselves.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83 and was probably thinking of retirement but someone’s got to keep her alive and working for another 4 years. Or at the very least another 2.
If she’d been fair dinkum she would have resigned when the democrats had control of the house, but no, she held on and now everyone is shitting themselves.
Might have been a risky move without control of the senate.
They had control.
You know, two things we haven’t discussed are:
1/ the fact that the deal to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons is probably now off
2/ Trump has a Congress where quite a few members of his party have said basically unforgivable stuff about him
I read a thread on facebook where people were claiming to have blocked 20-200+ people from their accounts.
And there was post from Trump saying people weren’t being fair.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:
dv said:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83 and was probably thinking of retirement but someone’s got to keep her alive and working for another 4 years. Or at the very least another 2.
If she’d been fair dinkum she would have resigned when the democrats had control of the house, but no, she held on and now everyone is shitting themselves.
Might have been a risky move without control of the senate.
This. Control of the house does nothing for you wrt the SC.
Peak Warming Man said:
Has there ever been a potus that has held no public office, political or administrative, and never been in the military.
I think Eisenhower only had a military background.
There has not.
They say now that in the US you can have mixed race marriage, or same sex marriage, but not a marriage of one Democrat and one Republican voter.
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:If she’d been fair dinkum she would have resigned when the democrats had control of the house, but no, she held on and now everyone is shitting themselves.
Might have been a risky move without control of the senate.This. Control of the house does nothing for you wrt the SC.
Yeah, but between the 2008 election and 2010 midterms they had overall majorities in both houses. Ginsberg should have stepped down and they could have installed someone with 30 years left in them.
sibeen said:
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Might have been a risky move without control of the senate.
This. Control of the house does nothing for you wrt the SC.
Yeah, but between the 2008 election and 2010 midterms they had overall majorities in both houses. Ginsberg should have stepped down and they could have installed someone with 30 years left in them.
You’re right … it’s just that you should have said Senate not house… just being unhelpfully pedantic. You’re welcome.
dv said:
sibeen said:
dv said:This. Control of the house does nothing for you wrt the SC.
Yeah, but between the 2008 election and 2010 midterms they had overall majorities in both houses. Ginsberg should have stepped down and they could have installed someone with 30 years left in them.
You’re right … it’s just that you should have said Senate not house… just being unhelpfully pedantic. You’re welcome.
They didn’t lose the senate in 2010, so I only mentioned the house when they had that two year window of opportunity.
I will try to be better in future.
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:Yeah, but between the 2008 election and 2010 midterms they had overall majorities in both houses. Ginsberg should have stepped down and they could have installed someone with 30 years left in them.
You’re right … it’s just that you should have said Senate not house… just being unhelpfully pedantic. You’re welcome.
They didn’t lose the senate in 2010, so I only mentioned the house when they had that two year window of opportunity.
I will try to be better in future.
OTOH … she is enormously experienced and swapping her out with a youngster is not a decision to be made lightly.
sarahs mum said:
I read a thread on facebook where people were claiming to have blocked 20-200+ people from their accounts.And there was post from Trump saying people weren’t being fair.
Trump tweets protests against him are ‘very unfair’
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/11/10/politics/kellyanne-conway-protesters-donald-trump-2016-election/index.html?sr=fbCNN111116kellyanne-conway-protesters-donald-trump-2016-election0601AMVODtopLink&linkId=31040130
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg is 83 and was probably thinking of retirement but someone’s got to keep her alive and working for another 4 years. Or at the very least another 2.
Ring up the Palace and see if they can borrow one of their doctors, they’re experts in this field.
Ginsborg

I hope Trump doesn’t bugger up our beef export trade with the US, it’s a nice little earner for us.
dv said:
You know, two things we haven’t discussed are:
1/ the fact that the deal to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons is probably now off
2/ Trump has a Congress where quite a few members of his party have said basically unforgivable stuff about him
And that first bit could be a problem for US relations with Israel.
buffy said:
dv said:
You know, two things we haven’t discussed are:
1/ the fact that the deal to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons is probably now off
2/ Trump has a Congress where quite a few members of his party have said basically unforgivable stuff about him
And that first bit could be a problem for US relations with Israel.
Pretty sure Israel never agreed with that agreement. Happy to be corrected. They wanted total shutdown of support for Iranian nuclear operations not facilitation.
AwesomeO said:
buffy said:
dv said:
You know, two things we haven’t discussed are:
1/ the fact that the deal to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons is probably now off
2/ Trump has a Congress where quite a few members of his party have said basically unforgivable stuff about him
And that first bit could be a problem for US relations with Israel.
Pretty sure Israel never agreed with that agreement. Happy to be corrected. They wanted total shutdown of support for Iranian nuclear operations not facilitation.
They have other options if necessary.
Driving home from work just now, stopped in at the servo to get a pack of smokes.
Walked in on a “situation”, a young lady customer clearly very unhappy. I asked her if she was OK and she told me (and the rest of the shop, loudly) that she had witnessed the clerk intentionally ignoring an Aboriginal customer at the other till. She says she called the clerk out on it and he started yelling at her.
I did not witness this, and can’t speak to what happened.
She had asked, and the clerk complied, to speak to his management over the phone, which she was doing as I left the store.
I wonder how common this kind of thing might become in Australia.
It did get me thinking though, my contributions throughout this thread have been very detached from people’s personal experiences. Even though I didn’t witness the event, and honestly can’t say whether it happened as described or not, it’s left a very unpleasant feeling in my gut.
Kii, Bubblecar – please do not think I don’t empathise with your positions, and please know that if I had witnessed overt racism I would still be in that servo right now, standing beside that woman in support of her. I don’t recant anything I’ve said in this thread, because I do genuinely believe that there are other things at stake which dwarf individual incidents like this, but please know that there are people out there who can be pro Trump who will still have zero regard for any of this kind of bullshit happening in front of them. You have more allies than you probably realise.
And I think that’s all I will have to say about this election. Any enthusiasm I had for talking about it has vanished.
Thank you everyone for remaining civil, and especially Kii and Bubblecar who reacted to comments I directed at them with far more civility than I probably had any right to expect.
This sucks.
Peak Warming Man said:
AwesomeO said:
buffy said:And that first bit could be a problem for US relations with Israel.
Pretty sure Israel never agreed with that agreement. Happy to be corrected. They wanted total shutdown of support for Iranian nuclear operations not facilitation.
They have other options if necessary.
Not many, without US support and distributed and hardened underground facilities.
esselte said:
Driving home from work just now, stopped in at the servo to get a pack of smokes.
Walked in on a “situation”, a young lady customer clearly very unhappy. I asked her if she was OK and she told me (and the rest of the shop, loudly) that she had witnessed the clerk intentionally ignoring an Aboriginal customer at the other till. She says she called the clerk out on it and he started yelling at her.
I did not witness this, and can’t speak to what happened.
She had asked, and the clerk complied, to speak to his management over the phone, which she was doing as I left the store.
I wonder how common this kind of thing might become in Australia.
It did get me thinking though, my contributions throughout this thread have been very detached from people’s personal experiences. Even though I didn’t witness the event, and honestly can’t say whether it happened as described or not, it’s left a very unpleasant feeling in my gut.
Kii, Bubblecar – please do not think I don’t empathise with your positions, and please know that if I had witnessed overt racism I would still be in that servo right now, standing beside that woman in support of her. I don’t recant anything I’ve said in this thread, because I do genuinely believe that there are other things at stake which dwarf individual incidents like this, but please know that there are people out there who can be pro Trump who will still have zero regard for any of this kind of bullshit happening in front of them. You have more allies than you probably realise.
And I think that’s all I will have to say about this election. Any enthusiasm I had for talking about it has vanished.
Thank you everyone for remaining civil, and especially Kii and Bubblecar who reacted to comments I directed at them with far more civility than I probably had any right to expect.
This sucks.
Well said.
And let me just say I love and/or tolerate you all.
dv said:
And let me just say I love and/or tolerate you all.
:) I’m very tolerant as well.
Oh dear, I made the mistake of reading the comments:
http://johnpavlovitz.com/2016/11/09/heres-why-we-grieve-today/
Here’s Why We Grieve Today
NOVEMBER 9, 2016 / JOHN PAVLOVITZ
——
Zaklog the Deplorable
NOVEMBER 11, 2016 AT 1:27 AM
As someone who’s seen what your kind does to people in their way when you have power, your tears are only joy to me. Maybe you should have looked to the future just a little bit when you were smashing people’s careers for thoughtcrime or telling us all how vicious and hateful we are for not wanting our children to be raped or murdered by ISIS infiltrators among “refugees”.
Cry more, please. We love it.
——
Jennifer Katona
NOVEMBER 10, 2016 AT 11:48 AM
lol @ this jew pretending to be a Christian. Go away to “Israel”, Pavlovitz, where you belong.
——
esselte said:
Driving home from work just now, stopped in at the servo to get a pack of smokes.
Walked in on a “situation”, a young lady customer clearly very unhappy. I asked her if she was OK and she told me (and the rest of the shop, loudly) that she had witnessed the clerk intentionally ignoring an Aboriginal customer at the other till. She says she called the clerk out on it and he started yelling at her.
I did not witness this, and can’t speak to what happened.
She had asked, and the clerk complied, to speak to his management over the phone, which she was doing as I left the store.
I wonder how common this kind of thing might become in Australia.
It did get me thinking though, my contributions throughout this thread have been very detached from people’s personal experiences. Even though I didn’t witness the event, and honestly can’t say whether it happened as described or not, it’s left a very unpleasant feeling in my gut.
Kii, Bubblecar – please do not think I don’t empathise with your positions, and please know that if I had witnessed overt racism I would still be in that servo right now, standing beside that woman in support of her. I don’t recant anything I’ve said in this thread, because I do genuinely believe that there are other things at stake which dwarf individual incidents like this, but please know that there are people out there who can be pro Trump who will still have zero regard for any of this kind of bullshit happening in front of them. You have more allies than you probably realise.
And I think that’s all I will have to say about this election. Any enthusiasm I had for talking about it has vanished.
Thank you everyone for remaining civil, and especially Kii and Bubblecar who reacted to comments I directed at them with far more civility than I probably had any right to expect.
This sucks.
:)
My Green party colleagues and I were asked to support a government motion to congratulate Donald Trump on winning the US presidential election. These types of motions are fairly commonplace in our parliament. They are token gestures of support and diplomacy – convenient ways to express our best wishes to political leaders in faraway places. They usually pass with little fanfare.
It’s easy to hate Donald Trump – but essential to learn from him Martin Kettle Martin Kettle Read more Yesterday was no different in that the motion passed – but this time, there were 14 objections. From us. For me, and many others, this was not a time for business as usual.Donald Trump will almost certainly never hear about what I said in parliament yesterday or, for that matter, give a flying toss. In that sense, our position may seem futile.
However, it is unconscionable that the Green party of Aotearoa New Zealand – which has a proud record of promoting tolerance, inclusiveness and peace – would send our best wishes to a man who has spouted misogynistic, racist, xenophobic and climate change-denying views.
As the Republican candidate in the US presidential election, Trump already had a significant platform; soon, as president, he will have the biggest megaphone in the world. So no, I don’t believe this is a time to be diplomatic or polite. If others wish to defend the actions of a sexual predator, they are welcome to. I won’t, and neither will my colleagues.
more..https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/11/this-is-no-time-to-be-diplomatic-new-zealand-shouldnt-wish-donald-trump-well?CMP=fb_gu
sarahs mum said:
If others wish to defend the actions of a sexual predator, they are welcome to. I won’t, and neither will my colleagues.more..https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/11/this-is-no-time-to-be-diplomatic-new-zealand-shouldnt-wish-donald-trump-well?CMP=fb_gu
Clinton?
sarahs mum said:
It’s easy to hate Donald Trump – but essential to learn from him Martin Kettle Martin Kettle Read more Yesterday was no different in that the motion passed – but this time, there were 14 objections. From us. For me, and many others, this was not a time for business as usual.
Good point, especially about the kettle
AwesomeO said:
sarahs mum said:If others wish to defend the actions of a sexual predator, they are welcome to. I won’t, and neither will my colleagues.more..https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/11/this-is-no-time-to-be-diplomatic-new-zealand-shouldnt-wish-donald-trump-well?CMP=fb_gu
Clinton?
What’s she done now?
I laughed…
https://www.crikey.com.au/2016/11/11/wayne-swan-stop-trump-by-helping-the-poor
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/whos-to-blame-for-americas-first-megalomaniac-celebrity-president?CMP=soc_567
Who do we blame?
The Democrats, who picked a flawed candidate in Hillary Clinton?
The Clintons, who have acted like the White House is their birthright?
The Republican party, which lost control of its base?
The media, which created a false equivalence between a former secretary of state and a reality TV star?
Wall Street, which comprehensively screwed ordinary Americans out of their homes and their jobs?
The US has elected its most dangerous leader. We all have plenty to fear Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Freedland Read more Political leaders, who have failed to manage the negative impacts of globalisation and the “new economy”?James Comey, the FBI director who intervened in a most dramatic fashion in the election campaign?
The Russians, for hacking and releasing the Democratic party’s emails?
Donald Trump, who lied, insulted and bullied his way into office?
The millions of Americans who let fear and hate trump optimism?
Frankly, all of the above.
The Democratic party should have woken up as to how flawed a candidate Clinton was once non-Democratic party member and ageing socialist Bernie Sanders emerged as an existential threat to her candidacy.
The Clintons – so renowned for supposed political nous – seemed to completely miss that they represented the ultimate insiders and political establishment in an era of outsiders and anti-establishment. If the Clintons really cared about their political party and their country, they should have understood that Hillary was the wrong candidate for the times and stood aside.
Hillary Clinton has been a polarising and unpopular figure in American politics for decades. I was never excited by her candidacy. I never believed Americans would vote for her – until Donald Trump became her opponent.
A bloviating idiot, a misogynistic fool, a racist, narcissistic reality TV star without a singular achievement to his name? Surely Americans would back a former secretary of state over him – even if she was Hillary Clinton.
How the hell did the Republican party – the party of Reagan’s “Morning in America”, of George HW Bush’s “1000 points of light”, of George W Bush’s compassionate conservationism, and the party of religious evangelicals – how did this party get behind such an utterly awful human being?
The Republican party leadership is largely to blame – they created and fed their party base with promises of lower taxes, balanced budgets and smaller government, and then for years delivered the opposite. They relied on the outrage media (Fox News, Rush Limbaugh) during the Clinton and Obama years to fuel anger – until that anger grew beyond their reach.
And let’s not forget the media. They are now clearly part of the elite – well and truly. Not one major newspaper endorsed Trump. Their readers – if people are still reading newspapers – didn’t care about their endorsements.
dv said:
https://www.crikey.com.au/2016/11/11/wayne-swan-stop-trump-by-helping-the-poor
—-
pfft, different systems. In the USA 40+% of potential voters don’t vote. If they don’t vote they don’t care.
esselte said:
Driving home from work just now, stopped in at the servo to get a pack of smokes.
Walked in on a “situation”, a young lady customer clearly very unhappy. I asked her if she was OK and she told me (and the rest of the shop, loudly) that she had witnessed the clerk intentionally ignoring an Aboriginal customer at the other till. She says she called the clerk out on it and he started yelling at her.
I did not witness this, and can’t speak to what happened.
She had asked, and the clerk complied, to speak to his management over the phone, which she was doing as I left the store.
I wonder how common this kind of thing might become in Australia.
It did get me thinking though, my contributions throughout this thread have been very detached from people’s personal experiences. Even though I didn’t witness the event, and honestly can’t say whether it happened as described or not, it’s left a very unpleasant feeling in my gut.
Kii, Bubblecar – please do not think I don’t empathise with your positions, and please know that if I had witnessed overt racism I would still be in that servo right now, standing beside that woman in support of her. I don’t recant anything I’ve said in this thread, because I do genuinely believe that there are other things at stake which dwarf individual incidents like this, but please know that there are people out there who can be pro Trump who will still have zero regard for any of this kind of bullshit happening in front of them. You have more allies than you probably realise.
And I think that’s all I will have to say about this election. Any enthusiasm I had for talking about it has vanished.
Thank you everyone for remaining civil, and especially Kii and Bubblecar who reacted to comments I directed at them with far more civility than I probably had any right to expect.
This sucks.
ruby said:
esselte said:Driving home from work just now, stopped in at the servo to get a pack of smokes.
Walked in on a “situation”, a young lady customer clearly very unhappy. I asked her if she was OK and she told me (and the rest of the shop, loudly) that she had witnessed the clerk intentionally ignoring an Aboriginal customer at the other till. She says she called the clerk out on it and he started yelling at her.
I did not witness this, and can’t speak to what happened.
She had asked, and the clerk complied, to speak to his management over the phone, which she was doing as I left the store.
I wonder how common this kind of thing might become in Australia.
It did get me thinking though, my contributions throughout this thread have been very detached from people’s personal experiences. Even though I didn’t witness the event, and honestly can’t say whether it happened as described or not, it’s left a very unpleasant feeling in my gut.
Kii, Bubblecar – please do not think I don’t empathise with your positions, and please know that if I had witnessed overt racism I would still be in that servo right now, standing beside that woman in support of her. I don’t recant anything I’ve said in this thread, because I do genuinely believe that there are other things at stake which dwarf individual incidents like this, but please know that there are people out there who can be pro Trump who will still have zero regard for any of this kind of bullshit happening in front of them. You have more allies than you probably realise.
And I think that’s all I will have to say about this election. Any enthusiasm I had for talking about it has vanished.
Thank you everyone for remaining civil, and especially Kii and Bubblecar who reacted to comments I directed at them with far more civility than I probably had any right to expect.
This sucks.
Good on you, Esselte.
I too will say good on esselte
What an idiotic statement. Whilst Trump is a flawed individual, his achievements cannot be denied.
Speedy said:
- ….without a singular achievement to his name…
What an idiotic statement. Whilst Trump is a flawed individual, his achievements cannot be denied.
He did successfully host a reality TV show.
dv said:
Speedy said:
- ….without a singular achievement to his name…
What an idiotic statement. Whilst Trump is a flawed individual, his achievements cannot be denied.
He did successfully host a reality TV show.
POTUS isn’t that bad of an achievement either.
dv said:
https://www.crikey.com.au/2016/11/11/wayne-swan-stop-trump-by-helping-the-poor
“Nationalism is on the rise in Australia, as it is elsewhere, but it is not yet out of control.”
We should all aspire to be serfs?
poikilotherm said:
dv said:https://www.crikey.com.au/2016/11/11/wayne-swan-stop-trump-by-helping-the-poor
“Nationalism is on the rise in Australia, as it is elsewhere, but it is not yet out of control.”
We should all aspire to be serfs?
?
dv said:
poikilotherm said:
dv said:https://www.crikey.com.au/2016/11/11/wayne-swan-stop-trump-by-helping-the-poor
“Nationalism is on the rise in Australia, as it is elsewhere, but it is not yet out of control.”
We should all aspire to be serfs?
?
I don’t get why nationalism is something that needs to be controlled?
Isn’t it normal for a countries population to be more concerned about things that matter to them, in their own country, than things that matter to another nation.
poikilotherm said:
dv said:
poikilotherm said:“Nationalism is on the rise in Australia, as it is elsewhere, but it is not yet out of control.”
We should all aspire to be serfs?
?
I don’t get why nationalism is something that needs to be controlled?
Isn’t it normal for a countries population to be more concerned about things that matter to them, in their own country, than things that matter to another nation.
That’s not what nationalism means
dv said:
poikilotherm said:
dv said:?
I don’t get why nationalism is something that needs to be controlled?
Isn’t it normal for a countries population to be more concerned about things that matter to them, in their own country, than things that matter to another nation.
That’s not what nationalism means
“Nationalism is a shared group feeling in the significance of a geographical and sometimes demographic region seeking independence for its culture or ethnicity that holds that group together. “
Seems to fit?
Why do people go far left or far right?
Why cant they stay in the center?
Centre…
CrazyNeutrino said:
Why do people go far left or far right?Why cant they stay in the center?
unknown
if you knew that you’d be a political genius
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/whos-to-blame-for-americas-first-megalomaniac-celebrity-president?CMP=soc_567Who do we blame?
The Democrats, who picked a flawed candidate in Hillary Clinton?
The Clintons, who have acted like the White House is their birthright?
The Republican party, which lost control of its base?
The media, which created a false equivalence between a former secretary of state and a reality TV star?
Wall Street, which comprehensively screwed ordinary Americans out of their homes and their jobs?
The US has elected its most dangerous leader. We all have plenty to fear Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Freedland Read more Political leaders, who have failed to manage the negative impacts of globalisation and the “new economy”?James Comey, the FBI director who intervened in a most dramatic fashion in the election campaign?
The Russians, for hacking and releasing the Democratic party’s emails?
Donald Trump, who lied, insulted and bullied his way into office?
The millions of Americans who let fear and hate trump optimism?
Frankly, all of the above.
The Democratic party should have woken up as to how flawed a candidate Clinton was once non-Democratic party member and ageing socialist Bernie Sanders emerged as an existential threat to her candidacy.
The Clintons – so renowned for supposed political nous – seemed to completely miss that they represented the ultimate insiders and political establishment in an era of outsiders and anti-establishment. If the Clintons really cared about their political party and their country, they should have understood that Hillary was the wrong candidate for the times and stood aside.
Hillary Clinton has been a polarising and unpopular figure in American politics for decades. I was never excited by her candidacy. I never believed Americans would vote for her – until Donald Trump became her opponent.
A bloviating idiot, a misogynistic fool, a racist, narcissistic reality TV star without a singular achievement to his name? Surely Americans would back a former secretary of state over him – even if she was Hillary Clinton.
How the hell did the Republican party – the party of Reagan’s “Morning in America”, of George HW Bush’s “1000 points of light”, of George W Bush’s compassionate conservationism, and the party of religious evangelicals – how did this party get behind such an utterly awful human being?The Republican party leadership is largely to blame – they created and fed their party base with promises of lower taxes, balanced budgets and smaller government, and then for years delivered the opposite. They relied on the outrage media (Fox News, Rush Limbaugh) during the Clinton and Obama years to fuel anger – until that anger grew beyond their reach.
And let’s not forget the media. They are now clearly part of the elite – well and truly. Not one major newspaper endorsed Trump. Their readers – if people are still reading newspapers – didn’t care about their endorsements.
John Pilger, in an interview I saw earlier today, was scathing about this article and all it represented.
poikilotherm said:
dv said:
poikilotherm said:I don’t get why nationalism is something that needs to be controlled?
Isn’t it normal for a countries population to be more concerned about things that matter to them, in their own country, than things that matter to another nation.
That’s not what nationalism means
“Nationalism is a shared group feeling in the significance of a geographical and sometimes demographic region seeking independence for its culture or ethnicity that holds that group together. “
Seems to fit?
Thank god you didn’t give the wiki link for that. Deevs(ious) would have been over there in a flash, edited it, and then come back here claiming that it states nothing of the sort.
:)
sibeen said:
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/09/whos-to-blame-for-americas-first-megalomaniac-celebrity-president?CMP=soc_567Who do we blame?
The Democrats, who picked a flawed candidate in Hillary Clinton?
The Clintons, who have acted like the White House is their birthright?
The Republican party, which lost control of its base?
The media, which created a false equivalence between a former secretary of state and a reality TV star?
Wall Street, which comprehensively screwed ordinary Americans out of their homes and their jobs?
The US has elected its most dangerous leader. We all have plenty to fear Jonathan Freedland Jonathan Freedland Read more Political leaders, who have failed to manage the negative impacts of globalisation and the “new economy”?James Comey, the FBI director who intervened in a most dramatic fashion in the election campaign?
The Russians, for hacking and releasing the Democratic party’s emails?
Donald Trump, who lied, insulted and bullied his way into office?
The millions of Americans who let fear and hate trump optimism?
Frankly, all of the above.
The Democratic party should have woken up as to how flawed a candidate Clinton was once non-Democratic party member and ageing socialist Bernie Sanders emerged as an existential threat to her candidacy.
The Clintons – so renowned for supposed political nous – seemed to completely miss that they represented the ultimate insiders and political establishment in an era of outsiders and anti-establishment. If the Clintons really cared about their political party and their country, they should have understood that Hillary was the wrong candidate for the times and stood aside.
Hillary Clinton has been a polarising and unpopular figure in American politics for decades. I was never excited by her candidacy. I never believed Americans would vote for her – until Donald Trump became her opponent.
A bloviating idiot, a misogynistic fool, a racist, narcissistic reality TV star without a singular achievement to his name? Surely Americans would back a former secretary of state over him – even if she was Hillary Clinton.
How the hell did the Republican party – the party of Reagan’s “Morning in America”, of George HW Bush’s “1000 points of light”, of George W Bush’s compassionate conservationism, and the party of religious evangelicals – how did this party get behind such an utterly awful human being?The Republican party leadership is largely to blame – they created and fed their party base with promises of lower taxes, balanced budgets and smaller government, and then for years delivered the opposite. They relied on the outrage media (Fox News, Rush Limbaugh) during the Clinton and Obama years to fuel anger – until that anger grew beyond their reach.
And let’s not forget the media. They are now clearly part of the elite – well and truly. Not one major newspaper endorsed Trump. Their readers – if people are still reading newspapers – didn’t care about their endorsements.
John Pilger, in an interview I saw earlier today, was scathing about this article and all it represented.
Then the article is probably right
nationalism: an extreme form of patriotism marked by a feeling of superiority over other countries.
plural noun: nationalisms
e.g. “playing with right-wing nationalism”
dv said:
Then the article is probably right
There is that :)
dv said:
poikilotherm said:
dv said:?
I don’t get why nationalism is something that needs to be controlled?
Isn’t it normal for a countries population to be more concerned about things that matter to them, in their own country, than things that matter to another nation.
That’s not what nationalism means
Maybe if written in better English.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Why do people go far left or far right?Why cant they stay in the center?
gravity stays the same, the earth keeps spinning and there’s a good chance the sun will rise in the morning.
so no, reality’s not swinging threatening an ontological crisis
Bloviate…yes, that’s apt for the store manager I have to work with. I’d forgotten about that word.
kii said:
Bloviate…yes, that’s apt for the store manager I have to work with. I’d forgotten about that word.
I think it is Bill O’Reilly’s favourite word.
You realise I am not fully awake and hurrying through the headlines here, but I just saw Trump has tapped Ben Carson for secretary of education.
kii said:
You realise I am not fully awake and hurrying through the headlines here, but I just saw Trump has tapped Ben Carson for secretary of education.
He’s trying to save a schekel or two. Just think, instead of all those different books you need for some scholastic courses, now you need only one. The very good book.
kii said:
You realise I am not fully awake and hurrying through the headlines here, but I just saw Trump has tapped Ben Carson for secretary of education.
Am I supposed to know who this Ben Carson is?
kii said:
You realise I am not fully awake and hurrying through the headlines here, but I just saw Trump has tapped Ben Carson for secretary of education.
yep…
party_pants said:
kii said:
You realise I am not fully awake and hurrying through the headlines here, but I just saw Trump has tapped Ben Carson for secretary of education.
Am I supposed to know who this Ben Carson is?
Think some of your family. Now think even wackier to the religious right.
dv said:
kii said:
You realise I am not fully awake and hurrying through the headlines here, but I just saw Trump has tapped Ben Carson for secretary of education.
yep…
—-
sarah pallin
tauto said:
dv said:
kii said:
You realise I am not fully awake and hurrying through the headlines here, but I just saw Trump has tapped Ben Carson for secretary of education.
yep…
—-
sarah pallin
I had hoped she’d go away.
sibeen said:
party_pants said:
kii said:
You realise I am not fully awake and hurrying through the headlines here, but I just saw Trump has tapped Ben Carson for secretary of education.
Am I supposed to know who this Ben Carson is?
Think some of your family. Now think even wackier to the religious right.
A bit like Yes Prime Minister when they appointed the chain-smoking Mr Leslie Potts to Minister for Sport?
Ah well, “Make America Great Again: really means “Accelerate the Decline”. What do you know, Trump is a mainstream politician after all, promise one thing, do the exact opposite.
party_pants said:
sibeen said:
party_pants said:Am I supposed to know who this Ben Carson is?
Think some of your family. Now think even wackier to the religious right.
A bit like Yes Prime Minister when they appointed the chain-smoking Mr Leslie Potts to Minister for Sport?
Ah well, “Make America Great Again: really means “Accelerate the Decline”. What do you know, Trump is a mainstream politician after all, promise one thing, do the exact opposite.
He has the job. It is up to him whether he is recorded in history as being the biggest mistake or not.
Most of the world has no confidence in him or his greatness of America. These things are already known history.
Whatever his surprise package is, he should be aware that at least half of us have no chance of being caught off guard by having our pussy snatched.
jj put this up elsewhere.
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/27209260-presidential-lottery
“In this eye-opening nonfiction account, world-renowned author James A. Michener details the reckless gamble U.S. voters make every four years: trusting the electoral college.
In 1968, Michener served as a presidential elector in Pennsylvania.
What he witnessed that fall disturbed him so much that he felt compelled to expose the very real potential in this system for a grave injustice with history-altering consequences.
Incorporating the wide-ranging insight and universal compassion of Michener’s bestselling novels, Presidential Lottery is essential reading for every American concerned about the ever-growing rift between the people and the political process.
Praise for Presidential Lottery
“Clear, concise, and sensible . . . a thoughtful book on how Americans choose their President.”—The New York Times
party_pants said:
sibeen said:
party_pants said:Am I supposed to know who this Ben Carson is?
Think some of your family. Now think even wackier to the religious right.
A bit like Yes Prime Minister when they appointed the chain-smoking Mr Leslie Potts to Minister for Sport?
Ah well, “Make America Great Again: really means “Accelerate the Decline”. What do you know, Trump is a mainstream politician after all, promise one thing, do the exact opposite.
Ben Carson believes the Biblical Joseph built the pyramids in order to store grain, I shit you not. He also thinks that Obamacare is “akin to slavery”, and that he “spent many a night pulling bullets out of bodies (but) never saw a body with bullet holes that was more devastating than taking the right to arm ourselves away.” Goes without saying that he rejects evolution and climate change. He’ll head up Trump’s education department.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/11/opinion/thoughts-for-the-horrified.html?ref=opinion
dv said:
party_pants said:
sibeen said:Think some of your family. Now think even wackier to the religious right.
A bit like Yes Prime Minister when they appointed the chain-smoking Mr Leslie Potts to Minister for Sport?
Ah well, “Make America Great Again: really means “Accelerate the Decline”. What do you know, Trump is a mainstream politician after all, promise one thing, do the exact opposite.
Ben Carson believes the Biblical Joseph built the pyramids in order to store grain, I shit you not. He also thinks that Obamacare is “akin to slavery”, and that he “spent many a night pulling bullets out of bodies (but) never saw a body with bullet holes that was more devastating than taking the right to arm ourselves away.” Goes without saying that he rejects evolution and climate change. He’ll head up Trump’s education department.
Don’t worry, the world’s fucked already. Now it can go a little faster.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/us/politics/trump-campaigned-against-lobbyists-now-theyre-on-his-transition-team.html?_r=0
President-elect Donald J. Trump, who campaigned against the corrupt power of special interests, is filling his transition team with some of the very sort of people who he has complained have too much clout in Washington: corporate consultants and lobbyists.
Jeffrey Eisenach, a consultant who has worked for years on behalf of Verizon and other telecommunications clients, is the head of the team that is helping to pick staff members at the Federal Communications Commission.
Michael Catanzaro, a lobbyist whose clients include Devon Energy and Encana Oil and Gas, holds the “energy independence” portfolio.
Michael Torrey, a lobbyist who runs a firm that has earned millions of dollars helping food industry players such as the American Beverage Association and the dairy giant Dean Foods, is helping set up the new team at the Department of Agriculture.
A number of the people on that list are well-established experts with no clear interest in helping private-sector clients. But to critics of Mr. Trump — both Democrats and Republicans — the inclusion of advisers with industry ties is a first sign that he may not follow through on all of his promises.
“This whole idea that he was an outsider and going to destroy the political establishment and drain the swamp were the lines of a con man, and guess what — he is being exposed as just that,” said Peter Wehner, who served in the administrations of Ronald Reagan and George Bush before becoming a speechwriter for George W. Bush. “He is failing the first test, and he should be held accountable for it.”
Transition teams help new presidents pick the new cabinet, as well as up to 4,000 political appointees who will take over top posts in agencies across the government. President Obama, after he was first elected, instituted rules that prohibited individuals who had served as registered lobbyists in the prior year from serving as transition advisers in the areas in which they represented private clients. They were also prohibited, after the administration took power, from lobbying in the parts of the government they helped set up.
“They wanted to make sure that people were not putting their thumb on the scale, or even the perception of that,” said Martha Joynt Kumar, the director of a nonprofit group called the White House Transition Project, which has studied two decades of presidential transitions.
That’s something like what happened this year. In fact, the error in national polls wasn’t any worse than usual. Clinton was ahead by 3 to 4 percentage points in the final national polls. She already leads in the popular vote, and that lead will expand as mail ballots are counted from California and Washington, probably until she leads in the popular vote by 1 to 2 percentage points overall. That will mean only about a 2-point miss for the national polls. They may easily wind up being more accurate than in 2012, when they missed by 2.7 percentage points.
But what about the state polls? They were all over the place. Clinton actually overperformed FiveThirtyEight’s adjusted polling average in 11 states and the District of Columbia. The problem is that these states were California, Hawaii, Illinois, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island and Washington. Since all of these states except for Nevada and perhaps New Mexico were already solidly blue, that only helped Clinton to run up the popular vote margin in states whose electoral votes she was already assured of. That’s especially true of Calfornia, where Clinton both beat her polls by more than 5 percentage points and substantially improved on Barack Obama’s performance from 2012.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-fivethirtyeight-gave-trump-a-better-chance-than-almost-anyone-else/
Ah well that’s something
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-will-trump-do-to-obamacare/
On the campaign trail, Donald Trump was clear that his priority for health care would be to repeal Obamacare. But after meeting with President Obama this week, he took a softer tone in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, saying that he’s looking into preserving some aspects of the law. Specifically, he expressed interest in two of the law’s most popular provisions: not allowing insurers to discriminate among buyers based on pre-existing health conditions and allowing young adults to stay on their parents’ health plans up to age 26. That still leaves a lot of unanswered questions about what he plans to do with the Affordable Care Act.
Although the law has been relatively unpopular since it passed, many aspects of it have been well received. In addition to those that Trump mentioned to the Journal, Medicaid expansion, which extended government insurance to more low-income people, and subsidies for people who buy insurance on marketplaces created under the law, have been viewed favorably in various surveys. A lot of Americans’ feelings about the law as a whole appear to be wrapped up in how much they trust the government, as Dan Hopkins detailed for us in 2014, well before Trump won the presidency on a campaign of change in Washington
I mean shit I haven’t even talked about the loss of the Democrats’ plans on the environment, criminal justice reform and drug law reform…
The scale of this keeps going up as new downsides occur to me.
dv said:
I mean shit I haven’t even talked about the loss of the Democrats’ plans on the environment, criminal justice reform and drug law reform…The scale of this keeps going up as new downsides occur to me.
Uh-huh.
dv said:
I mean shit I haven’t even talked about the loss of the Democrats’ plans on the environment, criminal justice reform and drug law reform…The scale of this keeps going up as new downsides occur to me.
Try not to dwell on it too much.
I’ve more or less just given up on America now. I think they have just voted to accelerate their own decline, but that’s their choice.
Leroy-: They shut the coal mine and the power station and put 3000 townsfolk out of work, they say they are going to replace it with wind turbines made in Germany, really good ones and it will create 100 jobs.
Does that make sense to you, Dave?
Dave-: Nope.
Leroy-: What are we going to do about it, Dave.
Dave-: Vote em out.
Democrats begin fight against Trump: his election ‘does not feel like America’
Harry Reid issues blistering statement decrying president-elect’s ‘forces of hate and bigotry’ as Elizabeth Warren urges voters to put in the work to resist Trump
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/11/democrats-harry-reid-elizabeth-warren-donald-trump
https://www.change.org/p/electoral-college-electors-electoral-college-make-hillary-clinton-president-on-december-19
kii said:
https://www.change.org/p/electoral-college-electors-electoral-college-make-hillary-clinton-president-on-december-19
Probably be a nice way to start a civil war.
sibeen said:
kii said:
https://www.change.org/p/electoral-college-electors-electoral-college-make-hillary-clinton-president-on-december-19
Probably be a nice way to start a civil war.
Now you know why they want their guns.
kii said:
Well, well, well.
https://www.change.org/p/electoral-college-electors-electoral-college-make-hillary-clinton-president-on-december-19
Michael V said:
kii said:Well, well, well.
https://www.change.org/p/electoral-college-electors-electoral-college-make-hillary-clinton-president-on-december-19
I don’t think what they’ve got is really democracy.
sibeen said:
kii said:
https://www.change.org/p/electoral-college-electors-electoral-college-make-hillary-clinton-president-on-december-19
Probably be a nice way to start a civil war.
Yep. So I signed it.
kii said:
sibeen said:
kii said:
https://www.change.org/p/electoral-college-electors-electoral-college-make-hillary-clinton-president-on-december-19
Probably be a nice way to start a civil war.
Yep. So I signed it.
Most civil wars are far from it…just saying.
At the last South Australian election the Liberals got 53% of the popular vote but Labor formed government on number of seats.
Was there rioting in the streets, nope.
There was no civil disobedience or feigned outrage because it’s not in conservatives DNA, they understand the system.
It’s the left who go on the torching and burning and smashing when things don’t go their way.
Peak Warming Man said:
At the last South Australian election the Liberals got 53% of the popular vote but Labor formed government on number of seats.
Was there rioting in the streets, nope.
There was no civil disobedience or feigned outrage because it’s not in conservatives DNA, they understand the system.
It’s the left who go on the torching and burning and smashing when things don’t go their way.
I posit that some in the USA Were on for a rumble no matter what happened.
What I don’t understand was why they weren’t demonstrating against him way back and why half of them decided it wasn’t worth voting..
Peak Warming Man said:
At the last South Australian election the Liberals got 53% of the popular vote but Labor formed government on number of seats.
Was there rioting in the streets, nope.
There was no civil disobedience or feigned outrage because it’s not in conservatives DNA, they understand the system.
It’s the left who go on the torching and burning and smashing when things don’t go their way.
Oh, shut up.
kii said:
Peak Warming Man said:
At the last South Australian election the Liberals got 53% of the popular vote but Labor formed government on number of seats.
Was there rioting in the streets, nope.
There was no civil disobedience or feigned outrage because it’s not in conservatives DNA, they understand the system.
It’s the left who go on the torching and burning and smashing when things don’t go their way.
Oh, shut up.
I think you’re being repressed, PWM.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l8ukak8P2vY
Peak Warming Man said:
At the last South Australian election the Liberals got 53% of the popular vote but Labor formed government on number of seats.
Was there rioting in the streets, nope.
Jesus Christ, PWM … do you really think it is the electoral college/popular vote dichotomy that people are protesting about?
Peak Warming Man said:
Leroy-: They shut the coal mine and the power station and put 3000 townsfolk out of work, they say they are going to replace it with wind turbines made in Germany, really good ones and it will create 100 jobs.
Does that make sense to you, Dave?Dave-: Nope.
Leroy-: What are we going to do about it, Dave.
Dave-: Vote em out.
I think that this is part of what happened. The Democrats did very poorly in the coal belt of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky.
I mean you never saw the Republicans protesting when BHO was elected




dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
At the last South Australian election the Liberals got 53% of the popular vote but Labor formed government on number of seats.
Was there rioting in the streets, nope.
Jesus Christ, PWM … do you really think it is the electoral college/popular vote dichotomy that people are protesting about?
It does seem to be the cry from many who are complaining.
dv said:
I mean you never saw the Republicans protesting when BHO was elected
So what’s with all the Hitler references?
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
I mean you never saw the Republicans protesting when BHO was electedSo what’s with all the Hitler references?
On the SBS news right now, into the third day of riots and demonstrations. I don’t recall similar when Obama was elected. That’s tolerance I guess.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
I mean you never saw the Republicans protesting when BHO was electedSo what’s with all the Hitler references?
Because Obama expanded health insurance coverage and let gays in the military, just like Hitler did.
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:
I mean you never saw the Republicans protesting when BHO was electedSo what’s with all the Hitler references?
On the SBS news right now, into the third day of riots and demonstrations. I don’t recall similar when Obama was elected. That’s tolerance I guess.
Dude … did you see what I just fucking posted?
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:So what’s with all the Hitler references?
On the SBS news right now, into the third day of riots and demonstrations. I don’t recall similar when Obama was elected. That’s tolerance I guess.
Dude … did you see what I just fucking posted?
Dude, I just got here. I am prepared to be corrected, maybe there was three days of demonstrations and riots after Obama was elected which I am unaware of.
A search on Obama Hitler connection mostly comes up with utube links I didn’t bother looking at, but this is an OK article about it:
http://www.dailydot.com/via/brief-guide-comparing-hitler-obama-internet/
Funnily enough, I hadn’t really noticed it before.
Obama was frequently, and absurdly, protested against
For the information of AwsomeO:
dv said:
I mean you never saw the Republicans protesting when BHO was elected
The Rev Dodgson said:
A search on Obama Hitler connection mostly comes up with utube links I didn’t bother looking at, but this is an OK article about it:http://www.dailydot.com/via/brief-guide-comparing-hitler-obama-internet/
Funnily enough, I hadn’t really noticed it before.
It’s also a comparison that has been made by gun nuts, in the mistaken belief that there was tight gun control in Nazi Germany.
The Rev Dodgson said:
For the information of AwsomeO:dv said:
I mean you never saw the Republicans protesting when BHO was elected
I think that’s a long bow to draw an equivalency to what has happened post election Obama to post election Trump to anyone who has a memory. But no matter anyway, even if you draw that equivalency and hold it equal it only means that supporters of both are as bad as each other.
No moral high ground here.
AwesomeO said:
No moral high ground here.
I didn’t know anyone had said anything about moral high grounds.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
AwesomeO said:On the SBS news right now, into the third day of riots and demonstrations. I don’t recall similar when Obama was elected. That’s tolerance I guess.
Dude … did you see what I just fucking posted?
Dude, I just got here. I am prepared to be corrected, maybe there was three days of demonstrations and riots after Obama was elected which I am unaware of.
It is easy to forget the other side.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
No moral high ground here.I didn’t know anyone had said anything about moral high grounds.
I didn’t know anyone had to.
The Rev Dodgson said:
A search on Obama Hitler connection mostly comes up with utube links I didn’t bother looking at, but this is an OK article about it:http://www.dailydot.com/via/brief-guide-comparing-hitler-obama-internet/
Funnily enough, I hadn’t really noticed it before.
It has been goinb on the entire eight years of Obama.. a mere three days protest against Trump is a mild itch in comparison.
Srsly … no one on the conservative side of US politics can ever claim the moral high ground, in any capacity or topic, ever again after this election. It’s really gobsmacking.
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
For the information of AwsomeO:dv said:
I mean you never saw the Republicans protesting when BHO was elected
I think that’s a long bow to draw an equivalency to what has happened post election Obama to post election Trump to anyone who has a memory. But no matter anyway, even if you draw that equivalency and hold it equal it only means that supporters of both are as bad as each other.
No moral high ground here.
You are the one with the moral high ground. Conveniently forgetting or not noticing the scale of the shit not only Barack Obama but Michelle had to deal with.
roughbarked said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Dude … did you see what I just fucking posted?
Dude, I just got here. I am prepared to be corrected, maybe there was three days of demonstrations and riots after Obama was elected which I am unaware of.
It is easy to forget the other side.
Do you recall three days of demonstrations and riots post Obamas election?
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
No moral high ground here.I didn’t know anyone had said anything about moral high grounds.
From my viewpoint it was more an interest in the extraordinary garbage that people are willing to accept from groups they support.
I mean I can accept that well paid white people might not like Obama, because they think he would increase the transfer of wealth to less well paid and non-white people, but to compare him to Hitler just seems really strange.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
No moral high ground here.I didn’t know anyone had said anything about moral high grounds.
Yeah. Curve did.
I’m beginning to think he doubles as the_observer.
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
No moral high ground here.I didn’t know anyone had said anything about moral high grounds.
I didn’t know anyone had to.
I didn’t know I’d said anyone had to.
roughbarked said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
No moral high ground here.I didn’t know anyone had said anything about moral high grounds.
Yeah. Curve did.
I’m beginning to think he doubles as the_observer.
of course, it all falls into place now!!!
dv said:
Srsly … no one on the conservative side of US politics can ever claim the moral high ground, in any capacity or topic, ever again after this election. It’s really gobsmacking.
It was the left I suggested can’t claim any moral high ground, at best if you hold the events post election of both equivalent, they are the same.
This has been a much more divisive campaign compared to 8 years ago. I think a better comparison would be to the possibility of riots has Clinton had won. I can’t see the most extreme of Trump supporters to have meekly gone home tails beneath their legs had the result been different.
Witty Rejoinder said:
This has been a much more divisive campaign compared to 8 years ago. I think a better comparison would be to the possibility of riots has Clinton had won. I can’t see the most extreme of Trump supporters to have meekly gone home tails beneath their legs had the result been different.
Well the evidence is in, the most extreme Clinton supporters haven’t gone home tails beneath their legs, into day three of riots and demonstrations now.
Both the same. No moral high ground.
AwesomeO said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
This has been a much more divisive campaign compared to 8 years ago. I think a better comparison would be to the possibility of riots has Clinton had won. I can’t see the most extreme of Trump supporters to have meekly gone home tails beneath their legs had the result been different.
Well the evidence is in, the most extreme Clinton supporters haven’t gone home tails beneath their legs, into day three of riots and demonstrations now.
Both the same. No moral high ground.
You’re the one who first suggested conservatives had the moral high ground.
Witty Rejoinder said:
This has been a much more divisive campaign compared to 8 years ago. I think a better comparison would be to the possibility of riots has Clinton had won. I can’t see the most extreme of Trump supporters to have meekly gone home tails beneath their legs had the result been different.
I think part of the rioting comes from those who were waiting to cut loose rather than the left or right..
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
This has been a much more divisive campaign compared to 8 years ago. I think a better comparison would be to the possibility of riots has Clinton had won. I can’t see the most extreme of Trump supporters to have meekly gone home tails beneath their legs had the result been different.
Well the evidence is in, the most extreme Clinton supporters haven’t gone home tails beneath their legs, into day three of riots and demonstrations now.
Both the same. No moral high ground.
You’re the one who first suggested conservatives had the moral high ground.
I did? I have only made about five or so posts so it must be down there and very close, find that post and I will clarify it, because that wasn’t my intention.
AwesomeO said:
I did? I have only made about five or so posts so it must be down there and very close, find that post and I will clarify it, because that wasn’t my intention.
That’s what i took away from this:
“On the SBS news right now, into the third day of riots and demonstrations. I don’t recall similar when Obama was elected. That’s tolerance I guess”
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:I did? I have only made about five or so posts so it must be down there and very close, find that post and I will clarify it, because that wasn’t my intention.
That’s what i took away from this:
“On the SBS news right now, into the third day of riots and demonstrations. I don’t recall similar when Obama was elected. That’s tolerance I guess”
That’s a statement of fact. That was reported on SBS and I don’t recall similar when Obama was selected. Do you?
When protest posters were presented as a rebuttal that was when I said that if you do draw an equivalency at best that means that supporters of both are as bad as each other. No moral high ground for anyone’s supporters.
Here it is again.
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
For the information of AwsomeO:dv said:
I mean you never saw the Republicans protesting when BHO was elected
I think that’s a long bow to draw an equivalency to what has happened post election Obama to post election Trump to anyone who has a memory. But no matter anyway, even if you draw that equivalency and hold it equal it only means that supporters of both are as bad as each other.
No moral high ground here.
AwesomeO said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:I did? I have only made about five or so posts so it must be down there and very close, find that post and I will clarify it, because that wasn’t my intention.
That’s what i took away from this:
“On the SBS news right now, into the third day of riots and demonstrations. I don’t recall similar when Obama was elected. That’s tolerance I guess”
That’s a statement of fact. That was reported on SBS and I don’t recall similar when Obama was selected. Do you?
When protest posters were presented as a rebuttal that was when I said that if you do draw an equivalency at best that means that supporters of both are as bad as each other. No moral high ground for anyone’s supporters.
My take on your remark is that Clinton supporters protesting are less tolerant than McCain supporters back in 2008. If that isn’t claiming the moral high ground I don’t know what is.
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:
Witty Rejoinder said:That’s what i took away from this:
“On the SBS news right now, into the third day of riots and demonstrations. I don’t recall similar when Obama was elected. That’s tolerance I guess”
That’s a statement of fact. That was reported on SBS and I don’t recall similar when Obama was selected. Do you?
When protest posters were presented as a rebuttal that was when I said that if you do draw an equivalency at best that means that supporters of both are as bad as each other. No moral high ground for anyone’s supporters.
My take on your remark is that Clinton supporters protesting are less tolerant than McCain supporters back in 2008. If that isn’t claiming the moral high ground I don’t know what is.
I came in when there seemed to be a debate that protests were just as bad when Obama was elected, look at the previous three or so before my first.
My point was that I didn’t think them just as bad, not three days worth and not equivalent, but, even if you do hold them equivalent, it’s still no victory, it still only means they are as bad as each other.
Having said that, and not being a dill, I also totally accept that this election was more divisive than the last.
AwesomeO said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:I did? I have only made about five or so posts so it must be down there and very close, find that post and I will clarify it, because that wasn’t my intention.
That’s what i took away from this:
“On the SBS news right now, into the third day of riots and demonstrations. I don’t recall similar when Obama was elected. That’s tolerance I guess”
That’s a statement of fact. That was reported on SBS and I don’t recall similar when Obama was selected. Do you?
When protest posters were presented as a rebuttal that was when I said that if you do draw an equivalency at best that means that supporters of both are as bad as each other. No moral high ground for anyone’s supporters.
You’ve simply conveniently forgotte it all or were somehow isolated from it.
roughbarked said:
AwesomeO said:
Witty Rejoinder said:That’s what i took away from this:
“On the SBS news right now, into the third day of riots and demonstrations. I don’t recall similar when Obama was elected. That’s tolerance I guess”
That’s a statement of fact. That was reported on SBS and I don’t recall similar when Obama was selected. Do you?
When protest posters were presented as a rebuttal that was when I said that if you do draw an equivalency at best that means that supporters of both are as bad as each other. No moral high ground for anyone’s supporters.
You’ve simply conveniently forgotte it all or were somehow isolated from it.
I don’t recall it, if you are claiming that post Obamas election there was three days of rioting and demonstrations I am happy for you to present it. I am surprised you haven’t already done it.
Is there really rioting? I’ve only seen footage of people with posters and banners. I think.
Anyway, this is interesting:
“Edison Research reports that 52 per cent of white women voted for Trump. But a full 93 per cent of black women voted for Clinton.”
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-11/annabel-crabb-us-election-opposite-day-for-women/8013592
AwesomeO said:
roughbarked said:
AwesomeO said:That’s a statement of fact. That was reported on SBS and I don’t recall similar when Obama was selected. Do you?
When protest posters were presented as a rebuttal that was when I said that if you do draw an equivalency at best that means that supporters of both are as bad as each other. No moral high ground for anyone’s supporters.
You’ve simply conveniently forgotte it all or were somehow isolated from it.
I don’t recall it, if you are claiming that post Obamas election there was three days of rioting and demonstrations I am happy for you to present it. I am surprised you haven’t already done it.
They didn’t do it for three days. They did it for eight years and are still doing it. See the_observer’s recent thread and comments.
Let me know when PWM comes in
OK, I looked up the news. It looks like reasonably low level stuff really. Protests. With a few hotheads. Pretty much the usual thing.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-11/trump-protests-wreak-havoc-on-us-streets/8019522
That headline is deceiving. You need to actually read the body of the piece.
roughbarked said:
AwesomeO said:
roughbarked said:You’ve simply conveniently forgotte it all or were somehow isolated from it.
I don’t recall it, if you are claiming that post Obamas election there was three days of rioting and demonstrations I am happy for you to present it. I am surprised you haven’t already done it.
They didn’t do it for three days. They did it for eight years and are still doing it. See the_observer’s recent thread and comments.
Well if you want draw that equivalency, spurious as I think it is, buckle up, the three days so far are just the start I suggest. And once more we are back to my point. No difference, no high ground.
buffy said:
OK, I looked up the news. It looks like reasonably low level stuff really. Protests. With a few hotheads. Pretty much the usual thing.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-11/trump-protests-wreak-havoc-on-us-streets/8019522
That headline is deceiving. You need to actually read the body of the piece.
Yeah. Pretty mundane compared to any normal day in the US.
buffy said:
OK, I looked up the news. It looks like reasonably low level stuff really. Protests. With a few hotheads. Pretty much the usual thing.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-11/trump-protests-wreak-havoc-on-us-streets/8019522
That headline is deceiving. You need to actually read the body of the piece.
got any rightwing reports. for balance like?
I’ll let you find those ones. I’m a pinko lefty socialist.
AwesomeO said:
roughbarked said:
AwesomeO said:I don’t recall it, if you are claiming that post Obamas election there was three days of rioting and demonstrations I am happy for you to present it. I am surprised you haven’t already done it.
They didn’t do it for three days. They did it for eight years and are still doing it. See the_observer’s recent thread and comments.
Well if you want draw that equivalency, spurious as I think it is, buckle up, the three days so far are just the start I suggest. And once more we are back to my point. No difference, no high ground.
as I said. You are sounding like the observer. Trump really did treat a wide range of the population like shit for the past 19 months and wasn’t reticent about doing the same beforehand. You think waving a few placards by a handful is rioting?
buffy said:
I’ll let you find those ones. I’m a pinko lefty socialist.
quelle horreur!
roughbarked said:
AwesomeO said:
roughbarked said:They didn’t do it for three days. They did it for eight years and are still doing it. See the_observer’s recent thread and comments.
Well if you want draw that equivalency, spurious as I think it is, buckle up, the three days so far are just the start I suggest. And once more we are back to my point. No difference, no high ground.
as I said. You are sounding like the observer. Trump really did treat a wide range of the population like shit for the past 19 months and wasn’t reticent about doing the same beforehand. You think waving a few placards by a handful is rioting?
Not me, the SBS news reported rioting and demonstrations.
dv said:
Srsly … no one on the conservative side of US politics can ever claim the moral high ground, in any capacity or topic, ever again after this election. It’s really gobsmacking.
FFS build a bridge and get over it.
OK, gone to the SBS news online. Looks like there was some violence in Portland. But all the rest seem just to be protest marches.
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/11/12/us-election-protests-continue-weekend
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/11/12/protests-rumble-trump-shakes-transition-team
buffy said:
Is there really rioting? I’ve only seen footage of people with posters and banners. I think.
ruby said:
buffy said:Is there really rioting? I’ve only seen footage of people with posters and banners. I think.
Good grief Buffy. How is calm and balance going to whip up division and hatred. We need to have average people slanging off at each other while a select few quietly gather ever more resources for themselves.
:)
Actually, I think a lot of people have not thought this through very well. If you deport the illegals, the wealthy lose their slaves. If you start up industry again, the workers are going to have to accept very low wages, or everything in Walmart is a lot dearer. I did hear someone mention that as the peso has devalued, Mexican goods are now cheaper in America. Perhaps not the intended outcome.
It’s all going to be very interesting. Remember the Roman Empire. It fell.
Probably won’t be long before the other side starts protesting too. Trump may not repeal Obamacare, he’s appointing lots of family members into choice positions, and Hillary is not going into the clink.
buffy said:
It’s all going to be very interesting. Remember the Roman Empire. It fell.
buffy said:
OK, gone to the SBS news online. Looks like there was some violence in Portland. But all the rest seem just to be protest marches.
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/11/12/us-election-protests-continue-weekend
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2016/11/12/protests-rumble-trump-shakes-transition-team
Arm them with Guns
runs away
buffy said:
It’s all going to be very interesting. Remember the Roman Empire. It fell.
the pink bits are still there though. aren’t they???
http://www.theonion.com/article/fbi-uncovers-al-qaeda-plot-to-just-sit-back-and-en-35788
FBI Uncovers Al-Qaeda Plot To Just Sit Back And Enjoy Collapse Of United Statesbuffy said:
It’s all going to be very interesting. Remember the Roman Empire. It fell.
More than once.
Seoul protest targets South Korean President Park Gun-hye
Very uncivilized. Don’t these people know that they should go home and accept the way things are…
John Howard: “If I was running al-Qaeda in Iraq, I would put a circle around March 2008, and pray, as many times as possible, for a victory not only for Obama, but also for the Democrats.”
Interesting Discussion on MSNBC with Michael Moore:
http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/michael-moore-joins-wide-ranging-election-talk-806604867876
I really don’t like Michael Moore but I must admit he picked this election like a nose
dv said:
I really don’t like Michael Moore but I must admit he picked this election like a nose
He did very well. Kudos to the scruffy bastard, he had a small town rust belt upbringing and as a doco maker inclined to listen.
US election: One shot during anti-Donald Trump protest in Portland
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-12/us-election-one-shot-during-anti-trump-protest-in-portland/8020630
Okay. I didn’t realise how many women in the USA vote for who their husbands tell them to vote for. :(
sarahs mum said:
Okay. I didn’t realise how many women in the USA vote for who their husbands tell them to vote for. :(
oh my.
I’m still looking for the riots in the news. Still look like marches and protests to me. This shooting looks like road rage.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-12/us-election-shots-fired-at-anti-trump-protest-in-portland/8020630
And anyway, didn’t Mr Trump refuse to say he would accept the result if it wasn’t his way? Pot, kettle, etc.
buffy said:
I’m still looking for the riots in the news. Still look like marches and protests to me. This shooting looks like road rage.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-12/us-election-shots-fired-at-anti-trump-protest-in-portland/8020630
And anyway, didn’t Mr Trump refuse to say he would accept the result if it wasn’t his way? Pot, kettle, etc.
And the paid/professional protesters thing. Who is paying that many people?
(there are so many people who are too scared to go outside too..)
sarahs mum said:
buffy said:I’m still looking for the riots in the news. Still look like marches and protests to me. This shooting looks like road rage.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-12/us-election-shots-fired-at-anti-trump-protest-in-portland/8020630
And anyway, didn’t Mr Trump refuse to say he would accept the result if it wasn’t his way? Pot, kettle, etc.
And the paid/professional protesters thing. Who is paying that many people?
(there are so many people who are too scared to go outside too..)
Well, I know from reading the Change.org thing that that is possible, but I think it is very unlikely. But yes, I think you are right. I also tend to think the current “riots” are possibly rather tame compared to the alternative scenario, given the groups of people involved in each side.
buffy said:
Well, I know from reading the Change.org thing that that is possible, but I think it is very unlikely. But yes, I think you are right. I also tend to think the current “riots” are possibly rather tame compared to the alternative scenario, given the groups of people involved in each side.
Tamb said:
buffy said:Well, I know from reading the Change.org thing that that is possible, but I think it is very unlikely. But yes, I think you are right. I also tend to think the current “riots” are possibly rather tame compared to the alternative scenario, given the groups of people involved in each side.
They look like “Rent -a-riot” to me.
If it were rioting it would have water cannons and rubber bullets.
No. Strike that. They are doing that at reasonably peaceful Indians.
Tamb said:
buffy said:Well, I know from reading the Change.org thing that that is possible, but I think it is very unlikely. But yes, I think you are right. I also tend to think the current “riots” are possibly rather tame compared to the alternative scenario, given the groups of people involved in each side.
They look like “Rent -a-riot” to me.
Well, however is paying them is definitely not getting their money’s worth. They aren’t rioting. Where are the smashed shop windows (I know there have been one or two), the looting, the car tipping over and burning, the waving around of guns, the shooting into the air stuff?
Tamb said:
buffy said:Well, I know from reading the Change.org thing that that is possible, but I think it is very unlikely. But yes, I think you are right. I also tend to think the current “riots” are possibly rather tame compared to the alternative scenario, given the groups of people involved in each side.
They look like “Rent -a-riot” to me.
Why?
kii said:
Tamb said:
buffy said:Well, I know from reading the Change.org thing that that is possible, but I think it is very unlikely. But yes, I think you are right. I also tend to think the current “riots” are possibly rather tame compared to the alternative scenario, given the groups of people involved in each side.
They look like “Rent -a-riot” to me.Why?
A comment from an American.
Can you name a time when the KKK has ever had parades scheduled (f*ck you NC officials that allow this) to celebrate their new “God Emperor”. Yeah, that’s the “Trump Train” and this is their language. Make America White Again.
Trump courted the White Supremacists from the day he announced his primary run, all the way through to his last 2-minute ad was as anti-semitic as it comes, naming all the banking globalists (jews) that control the media and caused the 2008 financial meltdown. All Jews are the scourge of the white America, that’s KKK and Aryan Nation BS , that’s what Trump and Trump Jr flaunted to get votes.
So in America 2016 it’s all political ambition if now Mosques burn, Black churches burn, and now with neo-Nazis are empowered and expect Synagogues to be desecrated and burning next. You think a single Planned Parenthood facility will be standing in a year? You think more weapons in the hands of these hateful crazies is somehow going to be okay? That the PULSE massacre won’t be seen again by our newly empowered domestic terrorists.
The Star of David on a pile of cash and accusing corruption and power , that’s what Trump advertised and the BS out of his mouth that it was a “sheriff’s star” somehow was not challenged as a lame dodge …. even after it was show that the image was lifted directly from american/european Aryan Nation propaganda.
Yesterday Trump tweeted blaming the hundreds of thousand of protestors every day and night across the country as paid professionals, the right wing media is blaming liberals and Clinton anarchists. Trump said ZERO about the rise of the KKK and hate he has enflamed.
And this is but 1/100 of the issues everyone’s terrified about.
Trump opened the door and was then carried on the shoulders of rashers of evil. Bush didn’t do that, Nixon didn’t. Truman dropped the bomb but not to gain personal political power.
Yeah, the hate was bubbling under the surface but Trump normalized it, exploited it, embraced it for his own gain. Trump dropped the hate bomb. When you say “The President elect will not bring down the rashers of evil that have been proclaimed he will do. We as a nation, have survived all sorts of presidents” I say when and who exactly is this? Obama? Clinton?

buffy said:
Tamb said:
buffy said:Well, I know from reading the Change.org thing that that is possible, but I think it is very unlikely. But yes, I think you are right. I also tend to think the current “riots” are possibly rather tame compared to the alternative scenario, given the groups of people involved in each side.
They look like “Rent -a-riot” to me.Well, however is paying them is definitely not getting their money’s worth. They aren’t rioting. Where are the smashed shop windows (I know there have been one or two), the looting, the car tipping over and burning, the waving around of guns, the shooting into the air stuff?
they’re a peaceful, mainly, leftwing rabble. unlike those violent fascist lot.
so the preseident met with the elect..and had a chat. The First lady met with the first lady elect.. and had a chat.
If Hill had won would the first lady have met with Bill? I mean it’s not like they need a tour of the whitehouse…
Arts said:
so the preseident met with the elect..and had a chat. The First lady met with the first lady elect.. and had a chat.
If Hill had won would the first lady have met with Bill? I mean it’s not like they need a tour of the whitehouse…
it doesn’t seem like it was much a of a party. no traditional happy snaps on the stairs on departure as per recent form..
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:
so the preseident met with the elect..and had a chat. The First lady met with the first lady elect.. and had a chat.
If Hill had won would the first lady have met with Bill? I mean it’s not like they need a tour of the whitehouse…
it doesn’t seem like it was much a of a party. no traditional happy snaps on the stairs on departure as per recent form..
it’s a terrible thing to lose faith in something that you loved and nurtured for 8 years…
Arts said:
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:
so the preseident met with the elect..and had a chat. The First lady met with the first lady elect.. and had a chat.
If Hill had won would the first lady have met with Bill? I mean it’s not like they need a tour of the whitehouse…
it doesn’t seem like it was much a of a party. no traditional happy snaps on the stairs on departure as per recent form..
it’s a terrible thing to lose faith in something that you loved and nurtured for 8 years…
How long do you think Michelle’s vegi garden will last? don’t need that when you have takeaway..
sarahs mum said:
Arts said:
sarahs mum said:it doesn’t seem like it was much a of a party. no traditional happy snaps on the stairs on departure as per recent form..
it’s a terrible thing to lose faith in something that you loved and nurtured for 8 years…
How long do you think Michelle’s vegi garden will last? don’t need that when you have takeaway..
vegi garden = nurturing… hmmm

JudgeMental said:
THIS^^^^^^ Exactly this.
JudgeMental said:
!https://scontent-sit4-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/15037234_10157790224165046_4983747272125434737_n.jpg?oh=2b6e51e42b68e63452a43c68f8a6b581&oe=5888F613
JudgeMental said:
13% battery…
shakes head…
PWM, it looks like my projection was wrong and the final turnout figure is going to be slightly lower than 2012.
OTOH it’s not the lowest ever: it’s higher than 1996 or 1988, for instance.

Terrifying Trump will turn into Tamed Trump? It’s an illusion
Andrew Rawnsley
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/13/donald-trump-election-terrifying-president-global-economy-security
Bubblecar said:
Terrifying Trump will turn into Tamed Trump? It’s an illusion
Andrew Rawnsleyhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/13/donald-trump-election-terrifying-president-global-economy-security
Always amazes me that people seek comment from political opposites and expect an unbiased view.


monkey skipper said:
Even worse here when you take the National Party seats into consideration.
Fine piece by Will Hutton:
Trade is the lifeblood of humanity. Closed doors lead to closed minds
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/13/america-trade-deals-donald-trump-nafta-isolationism
I suppose it is a DV type question.
Who apart from Trump has won while losing their home state?
sarahs mum said:
I suppose it is a DV type question.Who apart from Trump has won while losing their home state?
this nearly or did happen to John Howard the seat of benelong
monkey skipper said:
sarahs mum said:
I suppose it is a DV type question.Who apart from Trump has won while losing their home state?
this nearly or did happen to John Howard the seat of benelong
but he lost that election too..
sarahs mum said:
I suppose it is a DV type question.Who apart from Trump has won while losing their home state?
Define home state.
George W Bush twice lost his birth state (Connecticut) but won the elections, 2000 and 2004. However he did win his state of residence, Texas.
Nixon resided in New York but lost that state when he won election in 1968. However, he did win his birth state, California.
Woodrow Wilson resided in New Jersey but lost that state when he won election in 1912. However he did win his birth state, Virginia.
Lincoln lost his birth state of Kentucky in 1856 and 1860 when he won election, but did win his state of residence, Illinois.
Taylor lost his birth state of Virginia when he won in 1848, but won his state of residence, Louisiana.
Polk lost his birth state of North Carolina AND his state of residence Tennessee when he won in 1840.
Harrison lost his birth state of Virginia when he won in 1836, though technically he was born in a British colony, not a state per se. He won his state of residence, Ohio.
Jackson may have been born in North or South Carolina: if the latter, then he did not win his birth colony in 1832.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
I suppose it is a DV type question.Who apart from Trump has won while losing their home state?
Define home state.
George W Bush twice lost his birth state (Connecticut) but won the elections, 2000 and 2004. However he did win his state of residence, Texas.
Nixon resided in New York but lost that state when he won election in 1968. However, he did win his birth state, California.
Woodrow Wilson resided in New Jersey but lost that state when he won election in 1912. However he did win his birth state, Virginia.
Lincoln lost his birth state of Kentucky in 1856 and 1860 when he won election, but did win his state of residence, Illinois.
Taylor lost his birth state of Virginia when he won in 1848, but won his state of residence, Louisiana.
Polk lost his birth state of North Carolina AND his state of residence Tennessee when he won in 1840.
Harrison lost his birth state of Virginia when he won in 1836, though technically he was born in a British colony, not a state per se. He won his state of residence, Ohio.
Jackson may have been born in North or South Carolina: if the latter, then he did not win his birth colony in 1832.
That’s some good DVing.
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
I suppose it is a DV type question.Who apart from Trump has won while losing their home state?
Define home state.
George W Bush twice lost his birth state (Connecticut) but won the elections, 2000 and 2004. However he did win his state of residence, Texas.
Nixon resided in New York but lost that state when he won election in 1968. However, he did win his birth state, California.
Woodrow Wilson resided in New Jersey but lost that state when he won election in 1912. However he did win his birth state, Virginia.
Lincoln lost his birth state of Kentucky in 1856 and 1860 when he won election, but did win his state of residence, Illinois.
Taylor lost his birth state of Virginia when he won in 1848, but won his state of residence, Louisiana.
Polk lost his birth state of North Carolina AND his state of residence Tennessee when he won in 1840.
Harrison lost his birth state of Virginia when he won in 1836, though technically he was born in a British colony, not a state per se. He won his state of residence, Ohio.
Jackson may have been born in North or South Carolina: if the latter, then he did not win his birth colony in 1832.
nice. ta. :)
Trump and Polk are the only two to lose their birth state AND state of residence but win the election though in Trump’s case they are one and the same.
dv said:
Trump and Polk are the only two to lose their birth state AND state of residence but win the election though in Trump’s case they are one and the same.
What is Trump’s home state?
party_pants said:
dv said:
Trump and Polk are the only two to lose their birth state AND state of residence but win the election though in Trump’s case they are one and the same.
What is Trump’s home state?
New York
dv said:
though in Trump’s case they are one and the same.
Or in the case of New York, New York, two and the same.
The Rev Dodgson said:
dv said:though in Trump’s case they are one and the same.
Or in the case of New York, New York, two and the same.
very drole
Trump did a 60 minutes interview. The tone was refreshingly conventional and he kind of sounded like a normal person, but his comments on Assad, Putin and ISS were a bit troubling. It is true that trying to remove Assad brings the USA into unwanted conflict with Russia but what is he saying, that they should run their policy past Putin first? That any ally of Russia is off-limits?
dv said:
Trump did a 60 minutes interview. The tone was refreshingly conventional and he kind of sounded like a normal person, but his comments on Assad, Putin and ISS were a bit troubling. It is true that trying to remove Assad brings the USA into unwanted conflict with Russia but what is he saying, that they should run their policy past Putin first? That any ally of Russia is off-limits?
I’ve read that Putin has compromising footage of Trump at a Russian orgy. Make of that what you will.
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Trump did a 60 minutes interview. The tone was refreshingly conventional and he kind of sounded like a normal person, but his comments on Assad, Putin and ISS were a bit troubling. It is true that trying to remove Assad brings the USA into unwanted conflict with Russia but what is he saying, that they should run their policy past Putin first? That any ally of Russia is off-limits?
I’ve read that Putin has compromising footage of Trump at a Russian orgy. Make of that what you will.
Get me a bucket, or I might just make a Jackson Pollock.
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Trump did a 60 minutes interview. The tone was refreshingly conventional and he kind of sounded like a normal person, but his comments on Assad, Putin and ISS were a bit troubling. It is true that trying to remove Assad brings the USA into unwanted conflict with Russia but what is he saying, that they should run their policy past Putin first? That any ally of Russia is off-limits?
I’ve read that Putin has compromising footage of Trump at a Russian orgy. Make of that what you will.
Trump Russian orgy 1,180,000 results
Dave Chappelle Addresses Donald Trump’s Election on SNL 11/12/16
actually pretty funny
dv said:
Dave Chappelle Addresses Donald Trump’s Election on SNL 11/12/16actually pretty funny
Not usually a fan of DC?
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Dave Chappelle Addresses Donald Trump’s Election on SNL 11/12/16actually pretty funny
Not usually a fan of DC?
hit and miss
dv said:
Dave Chappelle Addresses Donald Trump’s Election on SNL 11/12/16actually pretty funny
It was quite well done.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/will-donald-trump-be-herbert-hoover-all-over-again/2016/11/11/8e533600-a820-11e6-8042-f4d111c862d1_story.html
But the 1928 comparison is instructive. It’s the last time a Republican president enjoyed anything like the majority Trump will have, particularly in the House.
And how did that work out for them?
Hoover took over in a time of general prosperity but stagnant wages and vast income inequality. Populists in Congress proposed dramatic increases in tariffs to help the struggling agricultural sector, the equivalent of today’s beleaguered blue-collar workers.
The proposal divided Republicans in Congress and Hoover before they produced the 1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, setting off retaliation, freezing international trade, contributing to the Great Depression and accelerating a ruinous cycle of nationalism around the world.
:https://pjmedia.com/video/lefty-reporter-jonathan-pie-gets-it-breaks-down-exactly-why-trump-won/2/
https://pjmedia.com/video/lefty-reporter-jonathan-pie-gets-it-breaks-down-exactly-why-trump-won/2/
A lefty ranting about why Trump won. Goes for about 6 minutes and is one of the best takes I’ve seen on it.
sibeen said:
https://pjmedia.com/video/lefty-reporter-jonathan-pie-gets-it-breaks-down-exactly-why-trump-won/2/A lefty ranting about why Trump won. Goes for about 6 minutes and is one of the best takes I’ve seen on it.
I think it is so typical of the weakness of the left that they blame themselves for the right’s successes. When the ALP got in in Australia, did Andrew Bolt blame himself and his kind for being too outspoken and insensitive? Did he fuck.
kakistocracy
PRONUNCIATION:
(kak-i-STOK-ruh-see, kah-ki-)
MEANING:
noun: Government by the least qualified or worst persons.
ETYMOLOGY:
From Greek kakistos (worst), superlative of kakos (bad) + cracy (rule). Ultimately from the Indo-European root kakka-/kaka (to defecate), which also gave us poppycock, cacophony, cacology, and cacography. Earliest documented use: 1829.
USAGE:
“We must weigh our votes carefully. Else we are in danger of turning America’s time-tested democracy into a kakistocracy.”
Dan Warner; The Best Man for the Job Is Not as Easy as it Sounds; The News Press (Fort Myers, Florida); Jan 17, 2016.
dv said:
sibeen said:
https://pjmedia.com/video/lefty-reporter-jonathan-pie-gets-it-breaks-down-exactly-why-trump-won/2/A lefty ranting about why Trump won. Goes for about 6 minutes and is one of the best takes I’ve seen on it.
I think it is so typical of the weakness of the left that they blame themselves for the right’s successes. When the ALP got in in Australia, did Andrew Bolt blame himself and his kind for being too outspoken and insensitive? Did he fuck.
roughbarked said:
dv said:
sibeen said:
https://pjmedia.com/video/lefty-reporter-jonathan-pie-gets-it-breaks-down-exactly-why-trump-won/2/A lefty ranting about why Trump won. Goes for about 6 minutes and is one of the best takes I’ve seen on it.
I think it is so typical of the weakness of the left that they blame themselves for the right’s successes. When the ALP got in in Australia, did Andrew Bolt blame himself and his kind for being too outspoken and insensitive? Did he fuck.
Trump’s campaign was more left than right.
Abolishing the federal minimum wage, massive tax cuts for millionaires, punishing women for abortions, are not left wing policies.
sibeen said:
https://pjmedia.com/video/lefty-reporter-jonathan-pie-gets-it-breaks-down-exactly-why-trump-won/2/A lefty ranting about why Trump won. Goes for about 6 minutes and is one of the best takes I’ve seen on it.
Nailed it.
“Fuck off to your safe place” LOL.AwesomeO said:
sibeen said:
https://pjmedia.com/video/lefty-reporter-jonathan-pie-gets-it-breaks-down-exactly-why-trump-won/2/A lefty ranting about why Trump won. Goes for about 6 minutes and is one of the best takes I’ve seen on it.
Nailed it.
“Fuck off to your safe place” LOL.
Didn’t see you around when I posted it, but I did suspect you would like it.
“When did the gymnastic society start thinking it was appropriate to enforce blasphemy laws”.
http://www.thedebrief.co.uk/news/politics/jonathan-pie-who-is-he-20160764102
dv said:
roughbarked said:
dv said:I think it is so typical of the weakness of the left that they blame themselves for the right’s successes. When the ALP got in in Australia, did Andrew Bolt blame himself and his kind for being too outspoken and insensitive? Did he fuck.
Trump’s campaign was more left than right.Abolishing the federal minimum wage, massive tax cuts for millionaires, punishing women for abortions, are not left wing policies.
I said, his campaign.. Mentioned policy not once.
Witty Rejoinder said:
http://www.thedebrief.co.uk/news/politics/jonathan-pie-who-is-he-20160764102
seen some of his stuff, pretty funny.
Witty Rejoinder said:
http://www.thedebrief.co.uk/news/politics/jonathan-pie-who-is-he-20160764102
http://www.consented.co.uk/read/people-of-colour-do-not-need-to-debate-racists/
Many pundits and commentators though are now claiming that lefties are just too soft and too scared to debate and discuss issues with people who don’t agree with them – a worrying trend in political discussions around safe-spaces and no-platforming.
Jonathan Pie, a popular vlogger, made this very argument last week in a video on Facebook that had over 20 million views on my last check.
Pie lambasted the so-called “left” for how soft they are and their inability to debate with people. His conclusion was that the left need to start winning arguments rather than hiding behind “trigger warnings” and other sensitivities.
“Fuck off to your safe-space or you can engage and debate me” declared an exasperated Pie. What a privileged and frankly bullshit argument.
This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.
How does one engage with a fascist or a racist? As a person of colour does this mean putting my life in danger by turning up to a KKK meeting and politely asking to read a passage from Franz Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth?
Do Pie et al expect said KKK supporters to stand up and applaud as I read “Everything can be explained to the people, on the single condition that you really want them to understand.” Do we believe these people will suddenly shed their white privilege and join the post-colonial struggle upon hearing Fanon’s words?
It literally makes no sense; those making this argument are so blind to their privilege. Andrew Marr or Pie could sit down with a racist and enjoy a beer because they are white men. People of colour don’t have this luxury as they fear deportation, state violence and attacks from these very people.
Since Brexit hate crimes have spiked whilst there have also been reports of horrible racist attacks since Trump gained power. Yet we’re supposed to debate these people? We’re supposed to stand there and say “Hey, I’m just like you, please don’t kill me”.
How embarrassing and patronising it is, to expect people to belittle themselves by doing this?
—-
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
http://www.thedebrief.co.uk/news/politics/jonathan-pie-who-is-he-20160764102
http://www.consented.co.uk/read/people-of-colour-do-not-need-to-debate-racists/
Many pundits and commentators though are now claiming that lefties are just too soft and too scared to debate and discuss issues with people who don’t agree with them – a worrying trend in political discussions around safe-spaces and no-platforming.
Jonathan Pie, a popular vlogger, made this very argument last week in a video on Facebook that had over 20 million views on my last check.
Pie lambasted the so-called “left” for how soft they are and their inability to debate with people. His conclusion was that the left need to start winning arguments rather than hiding behind “trigger warnings” and other sensitivities.
“Fuck off to your safe-space or you can engage and debate me” declared an exasperated Pie. What a privileged and frankly bullshit argument.
This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.
How does one engage with a fascist or a racist? As a person of colour does this mean putting my life in danger by turning up to a KKK meeting and politely asking to read a passage from Franz Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth?
Do Pie et al expect said KKK supporters to stand up and applaud as I read “Everything can be explained to the people, on the single condition that you really want them to understand.” Do we believe these people will suddenly shed their white privilege and join the post-colonial struggle upon hearing Fanon’s words?
It literally makes no sense; those making this argument are so blind to their privilege. Andrew Marr or Pie could sit down with a racist and enjoy a beer because they are white men. People of colour don’t have this luxury as they fear deportation, state violence and attacks from these very people.
Since Brexit hate crimes have spiked whilst there have also been reports of horrible racist attacks since Trump gained power. Yet we’re supposed to debate these people? We’re supposed to stand there and say “Hey, I’m just like you, please don’t kill me”.
How embarrassing and patronising it is, to expect people to belittle themselves by doing this?
—-
Hear hear.
sibeen said:
:https://pjmedia.com/video/lefty-reporter-jonathan-pie-gets-it-breaks-down-exactly-why-trump-won/2/
watched that, quite goodly put
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
http://www.thedebrief.co.uk/news/politics/jonathan-pie-who-is-he-20160764102
http://www.consented.co.uk/read/people-of-colour-do-not-need-to-debate-racists/
Many pundits and commentators though are now claiming that lefties are just too soft and too scared to debate and discuss issues with people who don’t agree with them – a worrying trend in political discussions around safe-spaces and no-platforming.
Jonathan Pie, a popular vlogger, made this very argument last week in a video on Facebook that had over 20 million views on my last check.
Pie lambasted the so-called “left” for how soft they are and their inability to debate with people. His conclusion was that the left need to start winning arguments rather than hiding behind “trigger warnings” and other sensitivities.
“Fuck off to your safe-space or you can engage and debate me” declared an exasperated Pie. What a privileged and frankly bullshit argument.
This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.
How does one engage with a fascist or a racist? As a person of colour does this mean putting my life in danger by turning up to a KKK meeting and politely asking to read a passage from Franz Fanon’s Wretched of the Earth?
Do Pie et al expect said KKK supporters to stand up and applaud as I read “Everything can be explained to the people, on the single condition that you really want them to understand.” Do we believe these people will suddenly shed their white privilege and join the post-colonial struggle upon hearing Fanon’s words?
It literally makes no sense; those making this argument are so blind to their privilege. Andrew Marr or Pie could sit down with a racist and enjoy a beer because they are white men. People of colour don’t have this luxury as they fear deportation, state violence and attacks from these very people.
Since Brexit hate crimes have spiked whilst there have also been reports of horrible racist attacks since Trump gained power. Yet we’re supposed to debate these people? We’re supposed to stand there and say “Hey, I’m just like you, please don’t kill me”.
How embarrassing and patronising it is, to expect people to belittle themselves by doing this?
—-
“This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.”
Jaysus, this is exactly his point. If someone disagrees with you it’s call them a racist or a fascist time.
facepalm
sibeen said:
“This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.”Jaysus, this is exactly his point. If someone disagrees with you it’s call them a racist or a fascist time.
facepalm
So like an oddly increasing number of people, you’ve decided that there isn’t really any such thing as racism and fascism?
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
“This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.”Jaysus, this is exactly his point. If someone disagrees with you it’s call them a racist or a fascist time.
facepalm
So like an oddly increasing number of people, you’ve decided that there isn’t really any such thing as racism and fascism?
What…what?
seeing as Pie is a comedian and a satirical one at that i doubt his ‘take” on trump’s win can be taken seriously.
and
He moved into international coverage after the 2016 US elections, where Pie’s report video on Trump’s win went viral to become a YouTube trending video. Conversely, some media, including PJ Media did not recognise he was a satire character, and his report was commentated on as a professional “British lefty reporter”.
wiki.
We’re entering a new and richer phase of “I’m not racist, but…”
This time it’s: “I’m not racist, but I’m happy to vote for one.”
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
“This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.”Jaysus, this is exactly his point. If someone disagrees with you it’s call them a racist or a fascist time.
facepalm
So like an oddly increasing number of people, you’ve decided that there isn’t really any such thing as racism and fascism?
Brexit was an expression of disquiet about services not keeping pace with immigration, with anxiety about border control, about political Islam, about thay tik er jerbs. Not the KKK or fascism and people who expressed disquiet were not klansman or fascists.
>So like an oddly increasing number of people, you’ve decided that there isn’t really any such thing as racism and fascism?
in the video the chap’s not to be taken too literally, he’s talking about repression of sorts really. He’s your jester for a moment.
The messages are a bit conflicting. I mean if you think that people voted for Trump because they are concerned about the economy, then the way the left discusses race and sex didn’t affect the result, so they might as well keep on keeping on.
dv said:
The messages are a bit conflicting. I mean if you think that people voted for Trump because they are concerned about the economy, then the way the left discusses race and sex didn’t affect the result, so they might as well keep on keeping on.
But of you said you were going to vote for trump you would be labeled a racist and probably a rapist. Which is pretty well what he was saying, people waited until the privacy of the poll booth.
sibeen said:
“This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.”Jaysus, this is exactly his point. If someone disagrees with you it’s call them a racist or a fascist time.
facepalm
Presumably they are allowed to call racists racists. Or are they too precious and sensitive to hear that?
dv said:
sibeen said:
“This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.”Jaysus, this is exactly his point. If someone disagrees with you it’s call them a racist or a fascist time.
facepalm
Presumably they are allowed to call racists racists. Or are they too precious and sensitive to hear that?
Have no problem at all to call a racist a racist, but to colour (sic) everyone who votes for a Trump or a Brexit or the Liberal Party a racist is just stupid.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
The messages are a bit conflicting. I mean if you think that people voted for Trump because they are concerned about the economy, then the way the left discusses race and sex didn’t affect the result, so they might as well keep on keeping on.
But of you said you were going to vote for trump you would be labeled a racist and probably a rapist. Which is pretty well what he was saying, people waited until the privacy of the poll booth.
Well I suspect that kind of thing contributed to the polling error.
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:
“This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.”Jaysus, this is exactly his point. If someone disagrees with you it’s call them a racist or a fascist time.
facepalm
Presumably they are allowed to call racists racists. Or are they too precious and sensitive to hear that?
Have no problem at all to call a racist a racist, but to colour (sic) everyone who votes for a Trump or a Brexit or the Liberal Party a racist is just stupid.
well, as a luvvie, i just ain’t going to quit that kind of labelling.
sibeen said:
dv said:
sibeen said:
“This might be a valid comment if we were talking about debating the viability of capitalism or socialism, but with regards to racism and fascism, it is utterly crass and disturbing.”Jaysus, this is exactly his point. If someone disagrees with you it’s call them a racist or a fascist time.
facepalm
Presumably they are allowed to call racists racists. Or are they too precious and sensitive to hear that?
Have no problem at all to call a racist a racist, but to colour (sic) everyone who votes for a Trump or a Brexit or the Liberal Party a racist is just stupid.
true enough
dv said:
The messages are a bit conflicting. I mean if you think that people voted for Trump because they are concerned about the economy, then the way the left discusses race and sex didn’t affect the result, so they might as well keep on keeping on.
If Hillary had been Michelle Obama, Trump would’t have stood a chance.
JudgeMental said:
well, as a luvvie, i just ain’t going to quit that kind of labelling.
I can’t help it either, being a luvvie and a libtard.
Bubblecar said:
JudgeMental said:
well, as a luvvie, i just ain’t going to quit that kind of labelling.
I can’t help it either, being a luvvie and a libtard.
i mean, we have to have some derogatory name for the right.
Bubblecar said:
JudgeMental said:
well, as a luvvie, i just ain’t going to quit that kind of labelling.
I can’t help it either, being a luvvie and a libtard.
Same. AKA as progressive, and not regressive….I will be calling Republicans – Regressives from now on.
Gawd…I can’t even think about this clusterfuck w/o starting to cry :(
Maybe the Democrats needed to fight fire with fire. Trump lied once per three minutes in his speeches and debates: the Dems needed someone who lied every two minutes. Trump spoke with the vocabulary of an eight year old. The Dems needed someone who spoke like a six year old. Trump insulted 80% of the population: the Dems needed to go the full 100.
I’m one of those who just don’t get it cuz I’m a wealthy elite cocooned in my metropolis bubble with my virtue-signalling luvvie friends and I know nothing about REAL PEOPLE and their endless pain and suffering.
dv said:
Maybe the Democrats needed to fight fire with fire. Trump lied once per three minutes in his speeches and debates: the Dems needed someone who lied every two minutes. Trump spoke with the vocabulary of an eight year old. The Dems needed someone who spoke like a six year old. Trump insulted 80% of the population: the Dems needed to go the full 100.
dem dems are quitters!
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
The messages are a bit conflicting. I mean if you think that people voted for Trump because they are concerned about the economy, then the way the left discusses race and sex didn’t affect the result, so they might as well keep on keeping on.
But of you said you were going to vote for trump you would be labeled a racist and probably a rapist. Which is pretty well what he was saying, people waited until the privacy of the poll booth.
I don’t see how Australians can think like Americans.
Bubblecar said:
I’m one of those who just don’t get it cuz I’m a wealthy elite cocooned in my metropolis bubble with my virtue-signalling luvvie friends and I know nothing about REAL PEOPLE and their endless pain and suffering.
Bevis isn’t really your friend. He gets paid to come around.
Bubblecar said:
I’m one of those who just don’t get it cuz I’m a wealthy elite cocooned in my metropolis bubble with my virtue-signalling luvvie friends and I know nothing about REAL PEOPLE and their endless pain and suffering.
I’m at the point now when I can laugh at the idea that this was a victory against some notional elite, rather than be infuriated or sad.
here
![]()
save everyone time.
:-)
dv said:
Maybe the Democrats needed to fight fire with fire. Trump lied once per three minutes in his speeches and debates: the Dems needed someone who lied every two minutes. Trump spoke with the vocabulary of an eight year old. The Dems needed someone who spoke like a six year old. Trump insulted 80% of the population: the Dems needed to go the full 100.
ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
Maybe the Democrats needed to fight fire with fire. Trump lied once per three minutes in his speeches and debates: the Dems needed someone who lied every two minutes. Trump spoke with the vocabulary of an eight year old. The Dems needed someone who spoke like a six year old. Trump insulted 80% of the population: the Dems needed to go the full 100.
ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
You mean…..like….a…..man?
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m one of those who just don’t get it cuz I’m a wealthy elite cocooned in my metropolis bubble with my virtue-signalling luvvie friends and I know nothing about REAL PEOPLE and their endless pain and suffering.
Bevis isn’t really your friend. He gets paid to come around.
He’s another luvvie, in fact one of those corrupt out-of-touch career politicians ‘cos he has a seat on a local Council Committee.
Bubblecar said:
I’m one of those who just don’t get it cuz I’m a wealthy elite cocooned in my metropolis bubble with my virtue-signalling luvvie friends and I know nothing about REAL PEOPLE and their endless pain and suffering.
Plus you don’t vote anyway, just like a lot of Americans.
AwesomeO said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m one of those who just don’t get it cuz I’m a wealthy elite cocooned in my metropolis bubble with my virtue-signalling luvvie friends and I know nothing about REAL PEOPLE and their endless pain and suffering.
Plus you don’t vote anyway, just like a lot of Americans.
Even the dead ones.
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
Bubblecar said:
I’m one of those who just don’t get it cuz I’m a wealthy elite cocooned in my metropolis bubble with my virtue-signalling luvvie friends and I know nothing about REAL PEOPLE and their endless pain and suffering.
Bevis isn’t really your friend. He gets paid to come around.
He’s another luvvie, in fact one of those corrupt out-of-touch career politicians ‘cos he has a seat on a local Council Committee.
He’s also an Australia Day Honours recipient (2013, Emergency Services Medal).
http://www.abc.net.au/site-archive/rural/tas/content/2013/03/s3712684.htm
JudgeMental said:
here
save everyone time.
:-)
I’d have hoped you could have joked us out of this despair.
Bubblecar said:
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:Bevis isn’t really your friend. He gets paid to come around.
He’s another luvvie, in fact one of those corrupt out-of-touch career politicians ‘cos he has a seat on a local Council Committee.
He’s also an Australia Day Honours recipient (2013, Emergency Services Medal).
http://www.abc.net.au/site-archive/rural/tas/content/2013/03/s3712684.htm
But did he fix your burning belt?
Last Week Tonight with John Oliver – S3E30 HBO ( 2016/11/13)
actually pretty thorough and funny
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
Maybe the Democrats needed to fight fire with fire. Trump lied once per three minutes in his speeches and debates: the Dems needed someone who lied every two minutes. Trump spoke with the vocabulary of an eight year old. The Dems needed someone who spoke like a six year old. Trump insulted 80% of the population: the Dems needed to go the full 100.
ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
Maybe the Democrats needed to fight fire with fire. Trump lied once per three minutes in his speeches and debates: the Dems needed someone who lied every two minutes. Trump spoke with the vocabulary of an eight year old. The Dems needed someone who spoke like a six year old. Trump insulted 80% of the population: the Dems needed to go the full 100.
ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
What do you mean it is not true? Sounds like you agree with me. I said they needed a different candidate and so do you.
AwesomeO said:
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
What do you mean it is not true? Sounds like you agree with me. I said they needed a different candidate and so do you.
I mean I don’t agree with the “pretty well any candidate” bit..
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
Maybe the Democrats needed to fight fire with fire. Trump lied once per three minutes in his speeches and debates: the Dems needed someone who lied every two minutes. Trump spoke with the vocabulary of an eight year old. The Dems needed someone who spoke like a six year old. Trump insulted 80% of the population: the Dems needed to go the full 100.
ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
Someone who was defendable. I am a leftist (and I am getting depressed at how this term is being used to insult me) but it was hard for me to pipe up and sing Hillary’s cause. My saying Trump is worse didn’t really help much. So now I am seeing memes go past with the first lady elect naked and appearing to be involved in lesbian photo shoots..and as much as I don’t like that slut shaming thing..I might ask why should people invest their respect in this couple and his strange children?
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:
diddly-squat said:I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
What do you mean it is not true? Sounds like you agree with me. I said they needed a different candidate and so do you.
I mean I don’t agree with the “pretty well any candidate” bit..
Well she went against the worst candidate possible who said the worst possible things, I can’t think of any one who would be worse so based on that…
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
Someone who was defendable. I am a leftist (and I am getting depressed at how this term is being used to insult me) but it was hard for me to pipe up and sing Hillary’s cause. My saying Trump is worse didn’t really help much. So now I am seeing memes go past with the first lady elect naked and appearing to be involved in lesbian photo shoots..and as much as I don’t like that slut shaming thing..I might ask why should people invest their respect in this couple and his strange children?
well respect is earned, so I guess that bit is up to him now… but I agree that personal attacks aren’t helpful to any part of this debate.
that being said, I think Hills said it best when she said that the American people owe Trump an open mind…
The simple fact is that Trump will be the next POTUS (unless the electors throw caution to the wind), the question is therefore, will he be a good president?
diddly-squat said:
The simple fact is that Trump will be the next POTUS (unless the electors throw caution to the wind), the question is therefore, will he be a good president?
He seems to have back-tracked on pretty much all his promises thus far. He may be a better Prez than we thought. Or he might still be a dick.
AwesomeO said:
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:What do you mean it is not true? Sounds like you agree with me. I said they needed a different candidate and so do you.
I mean I don’t agree with the “pretty well any candidate” bit..
Well she went against the worst candidate possible who said the worst possible things, I can’t think of any one who would be worse so based on that…
my point is that I don’t think Bernie would have won against Trump either…
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:
diddly-squat said:I mean I don’t agree with the “pretty well any candidate” bit..
Well she went against the worst candidate possible who said the worst possible things, I can’t think of any one who would be worse so based on that…
my point is that I don’t think Bernie would have won against Trump either…
I dunno. His general favourability was always higher than Clinton’s and, notably, he did better in the primaries than her in the rust belt states that Clinton lost in the general. But of course he has his own vulnerabilities and basically we’ll never know.
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
Maybe the Democrats needed to fight fire with fire. Trump lied once per three minutes in his speeches and debates: the Dems needed someone who lied every two minutes. Trump spoke with the vocabulary of an eight year old. The Dems needed someone who spoke like a six year old. Trump insulted 80% of the population: the Dems needed to go the full 100.
ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
I wonder whether Michelob would have won.
Divine Angel said:
diddly-squat said:The simple fact is that Trump will be the next POTUS (unless the electors throw caution to the wind), the question is therefore, will he be a good president?
He seems to have back-tracked on pretty much all his promises thus far. He may be a better Prez than we thought. Or he might still be a dick.
one of the things I’ll be interested to see if there is a backlash from the far right because of a backing down on on some of his policy platforms. Have a look at what is happening here, we essentially have a leader that is beholden to the far right minority – it’s not unthinkable to imagine the same happening in the states…
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
I wonder whether Michelob would have won.
though I suppose she is now part of an established dynasty
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
I wonder whether Michelob would have won.
my heart would like to say yes, but I’m not sure the American people are ready for a black woman as president…
I suspect Trump will eventually be assassinated by someone who’s just sick of hearing and reading the word “Trump”.
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
It’s driving many people nuts
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:
AwesomeO said:ooooooooorrrrrrrr, someone not as unpopular as HIlary who promised more of the same.
If they had a different candidate, pretty well any candidate, no one would be wailing.
I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
Someone who was defendable. I am a leftist (and I am getting depressed at how this term is being used to insult me) but it was hard for me to pipe up and sing Hillary’s cause. My saying Trump is worse didn’t really help much. So now I am seeing memes go past with the first lady elect naked and appearing to be involved in lesbian photo shoots..and as much as I don’t like that slut shaming thing..I might ask why should people invest their respect in this couple and his strange children?
I really don’t care if people “slut shame” her. I cannot stand shallow women who make their way in life via their looks.
kii said:
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
Someone who was defendable. I am a leftist (and I am getting depressed at how this term is being used to insult me) but it was hard for me to pipe up and sing Hillary’s cause. My saying Trump is worse didn’t really help much. So now I am seeing memes go past with the first lady elect naked and appearing to be involved in lesbian photo shoots..and as much as I don’t like that slut shaming thing..I might ask why should people invest their respect in this couple and his strange children?
I really don’t care if people “slut shame” her. I cannot stand shallow women who make their way in life via their looks.
For someone who is stuck in a cycle of self criticism I don’t know how they venture out in public.
kii said:
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:I’m not exactly sure that’s true either.. I mean people are saying that “this never would have happened if Bernie was our man” and to be honest, I just can’t see Americans rallying behind someone with an ideology as left at his…
What the Dems needed was a candidate that was articulate, charismatic, intelligent and not part of an established political dynasty. Essentially someone the exactly the same mold as Obama
Someone who was defendable. I am a leftist (and I am getting depressed at how this term is being used to insult me) but it was hard for me to pipe up and sing Hillary’s cause. My saying Trump is worse didn’t really help much. So now I am seeing memes go past with the first lady elect naked and appearing to be involved in lesbian photo shoots..and as much as I don’t like that slut shaming thing..I might ask why should people invest their respect in this couple and his strange children?
I really don’t care if people “slut shame” her. I cannot stand shallow women who make their way in life via their looks.
we shouldn’t hold people to standards that we, ourselves, are not prepared to adhere to…
Bubblecar said:
I suspect Trump will eventually be assassinated by someone who’s just sick of hearing and reading the word “Trump”.Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump TrumpIt’s driving many people nuts
I came in on the tail end of a conversation amongst some people at work. One has heard of an assassination plan that is being discussed on Mexican radio……*sigh *
sarahs mum said:
kii said:
sarahs mum said:Someone who was defendable. I am a leftist (and I am getting depressed at how this term is being used to insult me) but it was hard for me to pipe up and sing Hillary’s cause. My saying Trump is worse didn’t really help much. So now I am seeing memes go past with the first lady elect naked and appearing to be involved in lesbian photo shoots..and as much as I don’t like that slut shaming thing..I might ask why should people invest their respect in this couple and his strange children?
I really don’t care if people “slut shame” her. I cannot stand shallow women who make their way in life via their looks.
For someone who is stuck in a cycle of self criticism I don’t know how they venture out in public.
From someone..
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
sarahs mum said:Someone who was defendable. I am a leftist (and I am getting depressed at how this term is being used to insult me) but it was hard for me to pipe up and sing Hillary’s cause. My saying Trump is worse didn’t really help much. So now I am seeing memes go past with the first lady elect naked and appearing to be involved in lesbian photo shoots..and as much as I don’t like that slut shaming thing..I might ask why should people invest their respect in this couple and his strange children?
I really don’t care if people “slut shame” her. I cannot stand shallow women who make their way in life via their looks.
we shouldn’t hold people to standards that we, ourselves, are not prepared to adhere to…
Oh? What are you saying, doodles?
I heard on the radio last week that all of the Trump business stuff must now be made public. Has this started to happen yet? Something to do with President’s not being beholden, so all must be revealed.
kii said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:I really don’t care if people “slut shame” her. I cannot stand shallow women who make their way in life via their looks.
we shouldn’t hold people to standards that we, ourselves, are not prepared to adhere to…
Oh? What are you saying, doodles?
which bit do you not understand?
buffy said:
I heard on the radio last week that all of the Trump business stuff must now be made public. Has this started to happen yet? Something to do with President’s not being beholden, so all must be revealed.
Get rid of that apostrophe, where did that come from?
They were saying on the radio this morning that Trump will forgo the $400k pa pay cheque and only accept $1 per year. What a lovely, generous offer he has taken!
Divine Angel said:
They were saying on the radio this morning that Trump will forgo the $400k pa pay cheque and only accept $1 per year. What a lovely, generous offer he has taken!
I got no problem with that. I think it is a good thing.
Divine Angel said:
They were saying on the radio this morning that Trump will forgo the $400k pa pay cheque and only accept $1 per year. What a lovely, generous offer he has taken!
Putin’s probably paying him $millions per year.
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
sarahs mum said:Someone who was defendable. I am a leftist (and I am getting depressed at how this term is being used to insult me) but it was hard for me to pipe up and sing Hillary’s cause. My saying Trump is worse didn’t really help much. So now I am seeing memes go past with the first lady elect naked and appearing to be involved in lesbian photo shoots..and as much as I don’t like that slut shaming thing..I might ask why should people invest their respect in this couple and his strange children?
I really don’t care if people “slut shame” her. I cannot stand shallow women who make their way in life via their looks.
we shouldn’t hold people to standards that we, ourselves, are not prepared to adhere to…
I’ve never been in a nude photo shoot.
You’d have to be both extremely bored and a turd to slut shame anyone justified or not
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:I really don’t care if people “slut shame” her. I cannot stand shallow women who make their way in life via their looks.
we shouldn’t hold people to standards that we, ourselves, are not prepared to adhere to…
I’ve never been in a nude photo shoot.
I was simply suggesting that we shouldn’t sit here and complain about racist/sexist/disrespectful behavior from others and then act ourselves in racist/sexist/disrespectful ways.
diddly-squat said:
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:we shouldn’t hold people to standards that we, ourselves, are not prepared to adhere to…
I’ve never been in a nude photo shoot.
I was simply suggesting that we shouldn’t sit here and complain about racist/sexist/disrespectful behavior from others and then act ourselves in racist/sexist/disrespectful ways.
I’m not planning a nude photo shoot either.
Political scientist Professor Simon Jackman
Professor Simon Jackman leads the United States Studies Centre at the University of Sydney.
Interesting discussion on Classic FM
click the listen again button
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:
sarahs mum said:I’ve never been in a nude photo shoot.
I was simply suggesting that we shouldn’t sit here and complain about racist/sexist/disrespectful behavior from others and then act ourselves in racist/sexist/disrespectful ways.
I’m not planning a nude photo shoot either.
FWIW, I personally don’t feel that there is anything inherently wrong or bad about posing for a nude photo shoot. I just don’t think that it is reason to shame someone.
diddly-squat said:
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:I was simply suggesting that we shouldn’t sit here and complain about racist/sexist/disrespectful behavior from others and then act ourselves in racist/sexist/disrespectful ways.
I’m not planning a nude photo shoot either.
FWIW, I personally don’t feel that there is anything inherently wrong or bad about posing for a nude photo shoot. I just don’t think that it is reason to shame someone.
same
diddly-squat said:
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:I was simply suggesting that we shouldn’t sit here and complain about racist/sexist/disrespectful behavior from others and then act ourselves in racist/sexist/disrespectful ways.
I’m not planning a nude photo shoot either.
FWIW, I personally don’t feel that there is anything inherently wrong or bad about posing for a nude photo shoot. I just don’t think that it is reason to shame someone.
Not really, rather judgemental to call someone out on it as immoral or whatever.
A West Virginia mayor and local executive are facing mounting pressure to resign over a racist post about Michelle Obama.‘It will be refreshing to have a classy, beautiful, dignified First Lady in the White House. I’m tired of seeing a Ape in heels,’ wrote Clay County Development Corporation director Pamela Ramsey Taylor shortly after Donald Trump was elected as president.
Clay Mayor Beverly Whaling responded: ‘Just made my day Pam.’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3935342/West-Virginia-officials-fire-racist-Facebook-post-described-Michelle-Obama-Ape-heels-compared-classy-beautiful-Melania-Trump.htm
It’s a shame that the liberal left didn’t do more to connect with these people about their legitimate kkkoncerns
dv said:
A West Virginia mayor and local executive are facing mounting pressure to resign over a racist post about Michelle Obama.‘It will be refreshing to have a classy, beautiful, dignified First Lady in the White House. I’m tired of seeing a Ape in heels,’ wrote Clay County Development Corporation director Pamela Ramsey Taylor shortly after Donald Trump was elected as president.
Clay Mayor Beverly Whaling responded: ‘Just made my day Pam.’
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3935342/West-Virginia-officials-fire-racist-Facebook-post-described-Michelle-Obama-Ape-heels-compared-classy-beautiful-Melania-Trump.htm
It’s a shame that the liberal left didn’t do more to connect with these people about their legitimate kkkoncerns
Srsly though, when shit like this happens it makes me narrowly eye all those people who say criticism of the Obamas isn’t about race. There are clearly a lot of people who couldn’t stand there being a black president.
Clinton Spent $890 Million on not becoming President.
People Donated $890 Million to Clinton to not become President.
I don’t mind apes, no trouble at all.
Are they still rioting?
What if the rioting goes on for 4 years?
CrazyNeutrino said:
Clinton Spent $890 Million on not becoming President.People Donated $890 Million to Clinton to not become President.
She was supposed to bust the Brazillion mark.. must have backed off at the wrong time.
diddly-squat said:
sarahs mum said:
diddly-squat said:we shouldn’t hold people to standards that we, ourselves, are not prepared to adhere to…
I’ve never been in a nude photo shoot.
I was simply suggesting that we shouldn’t sit here and complain about racist/sexist/disrespectful behavior from others and then act ourselves in racist/sexist/disrespectful ways.
And I was saying that she chose to do those photos and now she is the future FLOTUS. The Regressives gave Michelle Obama heaps of hell for having bare arms in the middle of summer! Shock horror, but nude photo shoots are okay…?
Just to be clear – I was asked to do life drawing modelling in QLD, but I turned the offer down to go back to the saner state of NSW.
Cymek said:
diddly-squat said:
sarahs mum said:I’m not planning a nude photo shoot either.
FWIW, I personally don’t feel that there is anything inherently wrong or bad about posing for a nude photo shoot. I just don’t think that it is reason to shame someone.
Not really, rather judgemental to call someone out on it as immoral or whatever.
It’s hypocritical, in my opinion. We already have young girls becoming sexualised via clothing, parental influence and a heap of media, so these girls now have a “role model” in Melania Trump. Just great.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Clinton Spent $890 Million on not becoming President.People Donated $890 Million to Clinton to not become President.
what does all that money actually get spent on?
>becoming sexualised
seen hormones do that too
And what happens to the unspent money?
party_pants said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Clinton Spent $890 Million on not becoming President.People Donated $890 Million to Clinton to not become President.
what does all that money actually get spent on?
Mostly advertising I’d imagine.
I reckon advertising, travelling, accommodation and paying off celebrities :)
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Clinton Spent $890 Million on not becoming President.People Donated $890 Million to Clinton to not become President.
what does all that money actually get spent on?
Mostly advertising I’d imagine.
Stuff like this:
“CLAY, W.Va. (AP) – The director of a West Virginia development group and a mayor are under scrutiny after a racist post about first lady Michelle Obama caused a backlash and prompted calls on social media for both women to be fired.
Clay County Development Corp. director Pamela Ramsey Taylor made the post following Donald Trump’s election as president.
Her post said: “It will be refreshing to have a classy, beautiful, dignified First Lady in the White House. I’m tired of seeing a Ape in heels.”
Clay Mayor Beverly Whaling responded: “Just made my day Pam.”
A call to the Clay County Development Corp. went unanswered and Whaling didn’t immediately return a telephone message Monday.”
Also, people place way too much emphasise on “beauty”.
kii said:
Cymek said:
diddly-squat said:FWIW, I personally don’t feel that there is anything inherently wrong or bad about posing for a nude photo shoot. I just don’t think that it is reason to shame someone.
Not really, rather judgemental to call someone out on it as immoral or whatever.
It’s hypocritical, in my opinion. We already have young girls becoming sexualised via clothing, parental influence and a heap of media, so these girls now have a “role model” in Melania Trump. Just great.
I find the concept of role models strange, most “role models” seem to be quite uninspiring people
>I’m tired of seeing a Ape in heels.”
possibly bad English anyway, suppose to be an
transition said:
>I’m tired of seeing a Ape in heels.”possibly bad English anyway, suppose to be an
meh…it’s West “By God” Virginia.
Cymek said:
kii said:
Cymek said:Not really, rather judgemental to call someone out on it as immoral or whatever.
It’s hypocritical, in my opinion. We already have young girls becoming sexualised via clothing, parental influence and a heap of media, so these girls now have a “role model” in Melania Trump. Just great.
I find the concept of role models strange, most “role models” seem to be quite uninspiring people
Tamb said:
Cymek said:
kii said:It’s hypocritical, in my opinion. We already have young girls becoming sexualised via clothing, parental influence and a heap of media, so these girls now have a “role model” in Melania Trump. Just great.
I find the concept of role models strange, most “role models” seem to be quite uninspiring people
Or turn out to be less than was first supposed.
That as well
kii said:
Cymek said:
diddly-squat said:FWIW, I personally don’t feel that there is anything inherently wrong or bad about posing for a nude photo shoot. I just don’t think that it is reason to shame someone.
Not really, rather judgemental to call someone out on it as immoral or whatever.
It’s hypocritical, in my opinion. We already have young girls becoming sexualised via clothing, parental influence and a heap of media, so these girls now have a “role model” in Melania Trump. Just great.
Maybe Melania should wear US flag bikinis, or just cut jeans and a see through top
CrazyNeutrino said:
kii said:
Cymek said:Not really, rather judgemental to call someone out on it as immoral or whatever.
It’s hypocritical, in my opinion. We already have young girls becoming sexualised via clothing, parental influence and a heap of media, so these girls now have a “role model” in Melania Trump. Just great.
Maybe Melania should wear US flag bikinis, or just cut jeans and a see through top
or bikinis with printed hands on them
runs away
Like her pledge to combat online bullying…
furious said:
- It’s hypocritical, in my opinion.
Like her pledge to combat online bullying…
That was a roffle.
sarahs mum said:
furious said:
- It’s hypocritical, in my opinion.
Like her pledge to combat online bullying…
That was a roffle.
Four years of this level of stoopid, but…hey! Melania is beautiful! And The Donald is really smart with money.
Think I’ll go stand outside in a dark corner.
kii said:
sarahs mum said:
furious said:
- It’s hypocritical, in my opinion.
Like her pledge to combat online bullying…
That was a roffle.
Four years of this level of stoopid, but…hey! Melania is beautiful! And The Donald is really smart with money.
Think I’ll go stand outside in a dark corner.
Unless he completely shits the bed (which I guess isn’t out of the realm of possibility), history would suggest that most presidents get 2 terms.
How about those electoral college votes.
diddly-squat said:
kii said:
sarahs mum said:That was a roffle.
Four years of this level of stoopid, but…hey! Melania is beautiful! And The Donald is really smart with money.
Think I’ll go stand outside in a dark corner.
Unless he completely shits the bed (which I guess isn’t out of the realm of possibility), history would suggest that most presidents get 2 terms.
In the future Skynet sent back the Turdminator Donald Trump to the year 2016 to undermine US society and dumb down the population so much they were no longer a threat.
Tamb said:
diddly-squat said:
kii said:Four years of this level of stoopid, but…hey! Melania is beautiful! And The Donald is really smart with money.
Think I’ll go stand outside in a dark corner.
Unless he completely shits the bed (which I guess isn’t out of the realm of possibility), history would suggest that most presidents get 2 terms.
Except the ones who are shot.
None of single term presidents were assassinated
There have been 43 POTUS, 10 of which have only served one term.
Wasn’t Kennedy in his first term when assassinated?
Cymek said:
In the future Skynet sent back the Turdminator Donald Trump to the year 2016 to undermine US society and dumb down the population so much they were no longer a threat.
It’s a fulfillment of the documentary, Idiocracy.
diddly-squat said:
Tamb said:
diddly-squat said:Unless he completely shits the bed (which I guess isn’t out of the realm of possibility), history would suggest that most presidents get 2 terms.
Except the ones who are shot.Bush Senior: And since I’d achieved all my goals as President in one term, there was no need for a second.
None of single term presidents were assassinated
There have been 43 POTUS, 10 of which have only served one term.
diddly-squat said:
Tamb said:
diddly-squat said:Unless he completely shits the bed (which I guess isn’t out of the realm of possibility), history would suggest that most presidents get 2 terms.
Except the ones who are shot.None of single term presidents were assassinated
There have been 43 POTUS, 10 of which have only served one term.
diddly-squat said:
Tamb said:
diddly-squat said:Unless he completely shits the bed (which I guess isn’t out of the realm of possibility), history would suggest that most presidents get 2 terms.
Except the ones who are shot.None of single term presidents were assassinated
There have been 43 POTUS, 10 of which have only served one term.
Bush Senior: And since I’d achieved all my goals as President in one term, there was no need for a second.
clearly I needed two posts to get that right
Divine Angel said:
Cymek said:
In the future Skynet sent back the Turdminator Donald Trump to the year 2016 to undermine US society and dumb down the population so much they were no longer a threat.
It’s a fulfillment of the documentary, Idiocracy.
I was thinking that when he was elected… but then, who knows, he might not stuff it up. Obama was saying this morning that the position is a ‘representation’ a ‘head of state’ figure that has many advisers and meetings with the heads of various bodies every day. It’s not a dictatorship, he can’t just say something is going to happen and it will… it’s not North Korea.
furious said:
- None of single term presidents were assassinated
Wasn’t Kennedy in his first term when assassinated?
I wonder If the CIA have a rating for possible president assassinations?
I wonder where they have put Trump in such a rating?
You wait, pretty soon it will be mandated that all men should wear their hair like Trump…
furious said:
- None of single term presidents were assassinated
Wasn’t Kennedy in his first term when assassinated?
Yes. Kennedy and Garfield were both one termers, or indeed less than one term.
furious said:
- it’s not North Korea.
You wait, pretty soon it will be mandated that all men should wear their hair like Trump…
hold up.. even Kim gives them six options…
dv said:
furious said:
- None of single term presidents were assassinated
Wasn’t Kennedy in his first term when assassinated?
Yes. Kennedy and Garfield were both one termers, or indeed less than one term.
stands corrected…
Trump still opposes the EC system and thinks it should be a straight single vote.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-still-not-a-fan-of-the-electoral-college-190421409.html
President-elect Donald Trump once tweeted that the Electoral College is “a disaster for a democracy.”But now that it has helped him to win the election, does he still believe that?
“I’m not going to change my mind just because I won,” Trump said in an interview with CBS’ “60 Minutes” that aired Sunday. “But I would rather see it where you went with simple votes. You know, you get 100 million votes and somebody else gets 90 million votes and you win.”
CrazyNeutrino said:
As Trump’s racist regime takes power, FBI reports a surge in hate crimes against Muslims and others
given no encouragement by media and (some of) its audience
Lament of a depressed educator
In the age of Trump, why bother teaching students to argue logically?
Did you guys see the reports of a history teacher being suspended for comparing Trump to Hitler?

kii said:
Did you guys see the reports of a history teacher being suspended for comparing Trump to Hitler?
yes
dv said:
kii said:
Did you guys see the reports of a history teacher being suspended for comparing Trump to Hitler?
yes
Good.
dv said:
Lament of a depressed educatorIn the age of Trump, why bother teaching students to argue logically?
Without clinking on the link, my first thought is “that’s the spirit, give up”. The grief wankery is getting a bit silly now.
I get the impression that teacher might not be teaching impartially.
AwesomeO said:
The grief wankery is getting a bit silly now.
Says the white male in another country.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
Lament of a depressed educatorIn the age of Trump, why bother teaching students to argue logically?
Without clinking on the link, my first thought is “that’s the spirit, give up”. The grief wankery is getting a bit silly now.
I get the impression that teacher might not be teaching impartially.
Certainly, this is an emotive response but it is an amusing, if cynical, piece
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
Lament of a depressed educatorIn the age of Trump, why bother teaching students to argue logically?
Without clinking on the link, my first thought is “that’s the spirit, give up”. The grief wankery is getting a bit silly now.
I get the impression that teacher might not be teaching impartially.
Certainly, this is an emotive response but it is an amusing, if cynical, piece
Still not looked at the link. I am not convinced the trump voters voted illogically. If you are in a rust belt town, jobs are disappearing to China, if you retain a job it may be undercut in wages by an illegal immigrant, if you don’t have a job national debt is rising whilst services are being reduced or cut, and one of your candidates is an establishment figure who represents more of the same, and the other is an off the field candidate who promises to make America Great, and if you are sophisticated enough to think that unlikely you might be smart enough to realise that shaking up the system is no bad thing for you.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
AwesomeO said:Without clinking on the link, my first thought is “that’s the spirit, give up”. The grief wankery is getting a bit silly now.
I get the impression that teacher might not be teaching impartially.
Certainly, this is an emotive response but it is an amusing, if cynical, piece
Still not looked at the link. I am not convinced the trump voters voted illogically.
And this article doesn’t make the case that they did.
Regardless of why anyone voted for Trump (or, for that matter, didn’t vote at all) the arguments made by the Trump campaign were illogical and fact-free.
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:Certainly, this is an emotive response but it is an amusing, if cynical, piece
Still not looked at the link. I am not convinced the trump voters voted illogically.
And this article doesn’t make the case that they did.
Regardless of why anyone voted for Trump (or, for that matter, didn’t vote at all) the arguments made by the Trump campaign were illogical and fact-free.
Yup, sounds like an election campaign. In fact sounds like daily political discourse. Today Shorten was lambasting about 457 visas but they were never so high as under labor.
AwesomeO said:
dv said:
AwesomeO said:Still not looked at the link. I am not convinced the trump voters voted illogically.
And this article doesn’t make the case that they did.
Regardless of why anyone voted for Trump (or, for that matter, didn’t vote at all) the arguments made by the Trump campaign were illogical and fact-free.
Yup, sounds like an election campaign
Nnnope. Politicians do tend to deceive in various ways, but it has never happened before that a political nominee tells a straight and readily demonstrated lie once per three minutes in speeches and debates, or flatly denies saying things he just said the previous week. This was a remarkable, extraordinarily dishonest campaign.
dv said:
AwesomeO said:
dv said:And this article doesn’t make the case that they did.
Regardless of why anyone voted for Trump (or, for that matter, didn’t vote at all) the arguments made by the Trump campaign were illogical and fact-free.
Yup, sounds like an election campaign
Nnnope. Politicians do tend to deceive in various ways, but it has never happened before that a political nominee tells a straight and readily demonstrated lie once per three minutes in speeches and debates, or flatly denies saying things he just said the previous week. This was a remarkable, extraordinarily dishonest campaign.
I agree to a degree, but I am not going to stipulate that politicians especially during a campaign, don’t deny things they have previously said. Taken out of context is the vernacular for being sprung.
Just chill and watch this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm2C_pnaz-4

Wow.
Go stick some dynamite in their exhaust.
Wait, is that redneck shaming?
Divine Angel said:
Wow.Go stick some dynamite in their exhaust.
Wait, is that redneck shaming?
I am beyond caring.
So much hate and dick waving.
The dangerous fantasy behind Trump’s normalisation
Zoe Williams
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/15/dangerous-fantasy-donald-trump-normalisation-us-president-elect-barbarism
buy buy buy.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/with-ivankas-jewellery-ad-trump-companies-begin-to-seek-to-profit-off-election-result-20161115-gsq4yz.html
Bubblecar said:
The dangerous fantasy behind Trump’s normalisationZoe Williams
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/15/dangerous-fantasy-donald-trump-normalisation-us-president-elect-barbarism
yep
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
The dangerous fantasy behind Trump’s normalisationZoe Williams
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/15/dangerous-fantasy-donald-trump-normalisation-us-president-elect-barbarism
yep
Having said that, I don’t think BHO has much option than to try to effect a smooth transition and saying, “This guy is a fucking lunatic and you’re all imbeciles for voting for him” might not aid that end.
dv said:
Having said that, I don’t think BHO has much option than to try to effect a smooth transition and saying, “This guy is a fucking lunatic and you’re all imbeciles for voting for him” might not aid that end.
Sure. You can just see his eyes rolling whenever the T word is mentioned.
I listened to this as I frantically tried to relax while colouring in the cover of next year’s diary.
http://www.npr.org/2016/11/15/502157875/could-trump-undermine-the-legacy-of-the-obama-presidency-with-the-stroke-of-a-pe
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/15/dangerous-fantasy-donald-trump-normalisation-us-president-elect-barbarism
“Hillary Clinton’s concession speech buried the hatchet, on the basis that the peaceful transfer of power – a principle Trump explicitly rejected before the election – required that the nation give him “an open mind and the chance to lead”. “
“../cut/…the peaceful transfer of power – a principle Trump explicitly rejected before the election…/cut/…..”
that wasn’t how I understood what he said. Way I took his response was that he wasn’t giving any momentum to conceding defeat.
transition said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/15/dangerous-fantasy-donald-trump-normalisation-us-president-elect-barbarism“Hillary Clinton’s concession speech buried the hatchet, on the basis that the peaceful transfer of power – a principle Trump explicitly rejected before the election – required that the nation give him “an open mind and the chance to lead”. “
“../cut/…the peaceful transfer of power – a principle Trump explicitly rejected before the election…/cut/…..”
that wasn’t how I understood what he said. Way I took his response was that he wasn’t giving any momentum to conceding defeat.
No, what he said was as follows:
WALLACE: Mr. Trump, I want to ask you about one last question in this topic. You have been warning at rallies recently that this election is rigged and that Hillary Clinton is in the process of trying to steal it from you.Your running mate, Governor Pence, pledged on Sunday that he and you — his words — “will absolutely accept the result of this election.” Today your daughter, Ivanka, said the same thing. I want to ask you here on the stage tonight: Do you make the same commitment that you will absolutely — sir, that you will absolutely accept the result of this election?
TRUMP: I will look at it at the time. I’m not looking at anything now. I’ll look at it at the time.
What I’ve seen — what I’ve seen is so bad. First of all, the media is so dishonest and so corrupt, and the pile-on is so amazing. The New York Times actually wrote an article about it, but they don’t even care. It’s so dishonest. And they’ve poisoned the mind of the voters.
But unfortunately for them, I think the voters are seeing through it. I think they’re going to see through it. We’ll find out on November 8th. But I think they’re going to see through it.
WALLACE: But, sir, there’s…
TRUMP: If you look — excuse me, Chris — if you look at your voter rolls, you will see millions of people that are registered to vote — millions, this isn’t coming from me — this is coming from Pew Report and other places — millions of people that are registered to vote that shouldn’t be registered to vote.
So let me just give you one other thing. So I talk about the corrupt media. I talk about the millions of people — tell you one other thing. She shouldn’t be allowed to run. It’s crooked — she’s — she’s guilty of a very, very serious crime. She should not be allowed to run.
And just in that respect, I say it’s rigged, because she should never…
WALLACE: But…
TRUMP: Chris, she should never have been allowed to run for the presidency based on what she did with e-mails and so many other things.
WALLACE: But, sir, there is a tradition in this country — in fact, one of the prides of this country — is the peaceful transition of power and that no matter how hard-fought a campaign is, that at the end of the campaign that the loser concedes to the winner. Not saying that you’re necessarily going to be the loser or the winner, but that the loser concedes to the winner and that the country comes together in part for the good of the country. Are you saying you’re not prepared now to commit to that principle?
TRUMP: What I’m saying is that I will tell you at the time. I’ll keep you in suspense. OK?
Nothing about momentum of conceding defeat, just straight saying he wouldn’t promise to accept the result.
>Nothing about momentum of conceding defeat, just straight saying he wouldn’t promise to accept the result.
I don’t agree. I mean take one word, your use of “accept” (or citing it), which you’re leaning on a respectability in. We’re talking of before the election, while compaigning. The words (concepts of) accept and concede have a lot in common. You could quibble, but it’s undeniable.
And campaigns are very much about momentum.
Media doesn’t mind something more that a bit of momentum too, you know the contagion, it helps with adevertizing and such.
No, he answered like he did because he wasn’t pretending to graciousness. Didn’t patronize the bullshit.
biggest loss from trump will be that he won’t really enjoy* the job, not for long.
*meaning the loss will be in the end that he maybe’ll secretely wish he never took it on.
dv said:
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
The dangerous fantasy behind Trump’s normalisationZoe Williams
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/15/dangerous-fantasy-donald-trump-normalisation-us-president-elect-barbarism
yep
Having said that, I don’t think BHO has much option than to try to effect a smooth transition and saying, “This guy is a fucking lunatic and you’re all imbeciles for voting for him” might not aid that end.
“But Boris Johnson, foreign secretary, telling EU leaders to “snap out of the doom and gloom”, calling Trump a “dealmaker”, “someone with whom we can do business”, telling us to “see this is an opportunity”: that is normalising. Look on the bright side, liberals. The sheer fatuousness of Johnson’s speech, the absence of any discernible values, or a backbone to put behind them, raises in me an unfathomable, hot, eye-pricking sense of having been betrayed. How was it possible for Johnson to disappoint, after his delinquent and self-serving summer? It’s like discovering that a neighbour, after a long party-wall dispute, has shopped you to the Stasi. I knew he was a jerk; I never realised he scorned our shared humanity.”
Never get a rest from the media providing normal through abnormalizing, dressed up however. Without the tools of hyperrelativism, wandering comparison (seeds of envy and resentment), there’s all that abundance splashing it around.
transition said:
Never get a rest from the media providing normal through abnormalizing, dressed up however. Without the tools of hyperrelativism, wandering comparison (seeds of envy and resentment), there’s all that abundance splashing it around.
Yeah that’s what’s really worrying about this.
Not.
One worry is how easily millions of people can be convinced to vote for an apparent moron and its not like his election campaign was sophisticated either
Cymek said:
One worry is how easily millions of people can be convinced to vote for an apparent moron and its not like his election campaign was sophisticated either
We voted for Abbot, or is that too long ago?
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:
One worry is how easily millions of people can be convinced to vote for an apparent moron and its not like his election campaign was sophisticated either
We voted for Abbot, or is that too long ago?
My sister apologised and said she would never ever do it again. (Which is probably true as she changed electorates..)
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:
One worry is how easily millions of people can be convinced to vote for an apparent moron and its not like his election campaign was sophisticated either
We voted for Abbot, or is that too long ago?
That it true but I personally didn’t
Cymek said:
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:
One worry is how easily millions of people can be convinced to vote for an apparent moron and its not like his election campaign was sophisticated either
We voted for Abbot, or is that too long ago?
That it true but I personally didn’t
There were millions in America who didn’t either. So they must be the bright ones? Likewise in Australia all those that voted for Abbot (the majority of the population) are dimwits?
Cymek said:
One worry is how easily millions of people can be convinced to vote for an apparent moron and its not like his election campaign was sophisticated either
My theory has been outlined here.
dv said:
transition said:WALLACE: But, sir, there’s…
TRUMP: If you look — excuse me, Chris — if you look at your voter rolls, you will see millions of people that are registered to vote — millions, this isn’t coming from me — this is coming from Pew Report and other places — millions of people that are registered to vote that shouldn’t be registered to vote.
Nothing about momentum of conceding defeat, just straight saying he wouldn’t promise to accept the result.
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:
PermeateFree said:We voted for Abbot, or is that too long ago?
That it true but I personally didn’t
There were millions in America who didn’t either. So they must be the bright ones? Likewise in Australia all those that voted for Abbot (the majority of the population) are dimwits?
I suppose it can also come down to voting for the least worst candidate. We don’t vote for a person though more the party and have to put up with whoever the leader is for that party.
kii said:
Cymek said:
One worry is how easily millions of people can be convinced to vote for an apparent moron and its not like his election campaign was sophisticated either
My theory has been outlined here.
I am pleased that you are not one of those who consider they have been left behind and their standard of living are falling.
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:
PermeateFree said:We voted for Abbot, or is that too long ago?
That it true but I personally didn’t
There were millions in America who didn’t either. So they must be the bright ones? Likewise in Australia all those that voted for Abbot (the majority of the population) are dimwits?
Abbott, Abbott, Abbott. Get it right.
Cymek said:
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:That it true but I personally didn’t
There were millions in America who didn’t either. So they must be the bright ones? Likewise in Australia all those that voted for Abbot (the majority of the population) are dimwits?
I suppose it can also come down to voting for the least worst candidate. We don’t vote for a person though more the party and have to put up with whoever the leader is for that party.
Like we have always done with little thought.
PermeateFree said:
kii said:
Cymek said:
One worry is how easily millions of people can be convinced to vote for an apparent moron and its not like his election campaign was sophisticated either
My theory has been outlined here.
I am pleased that you are not one of those who consider they have been left behind and their standard of living are falling.
What?
kii said:
PermeateFree said:
Cymek said:That it true but I personally didn’t
There were millions in America who didn’t either. So they must be the bright ones? Likewise in Australia all those that voted for Abbot (the majority of the population) are dimwits?
Abbott, Abbott, Abbott. Get it right.
I was beginning to forget him.
kii said:
PermeateFree said:
kii said:My theory has been outlined here.
I am pleased that you are not one of those who consider they have been left behind and their standard of living are falling.
What?
That apparently is the main reason why so many people voted for Trump.
PermeateFree said:
kii said:
PermeateFree said:I am pleased that you are not one of those who consider they have been left behind and their standard of living are falling.
What?
That apparently is the main reason why so many people voted for Trump.
Perhaps if we are to limit the damage caused by human civilisation our standard of living may need to fall or at least stabilise
LOL Steve Bannon is going to be Trump’s chief strategist in the White House. Bannon is famous for headlines like these when he was running Breitbart.
“Racist, Pro-Nazi roots of Planned Parenthood revealed”
“Trump 100% vindicated: CBS reports swarms on rooftops celebrating 9/11”
“Teenage boys with tits: Here’s my problem with Ghostbusters”
“The solution to online harrassment is simple: women should log off”
“Huma Abedin most likely a Saudi spy”
“Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy”
“Planned Parenthood’s body count under Cecile Richards up to half a holocaust”
“Gabby Giffords: the gun control movement’s human shield”
Cymek said:
PermeateFree said:
kii said:What?
That apparently is the main reason why so many people voted for Trump.
Perhaps if we are to limit the damage caused by human civilisation our standard of living may need to fall or at least stabilise
Don’t dispute that at all. I am not taking sides, just an interested observer.
dv said:
LOL Steve Bannon is going to be Trump’s chief strategist in the White House. Bannon is famous for headlines like these when he was running Breitbart.“Racist, Pro-Nazi roots of Planned Parenthood revealed”
“Trump 100% vindicated: CBS reports swarms on rooftops celebrating 9/11”
“Teenage boys with tits: Here’s my problem with Ghostbusters”
“The solution to online harrassment is simple: women should log off”
“Huma Abedin most likely a Saudi spy”
“Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy”
“Planned Parenthood’s body count under Cecile Richards up to half a holocaust”
“Gabby Giffords: the gun control movement’s human shield”
He’s convincingly putrid.
dv said:
LOL Steve Bannon is going to be Trump’s chief strategist in the White House. Bannon is famous for headlines like these when he was running Breitbart.“Racist, Pro-Nazi roots of Planned Parenthood revealed”
“Trump 100% vindicated: CBS reports swarms on rooftops celebrating 9/11”
“Teenage boys with tits: Here’s my problem with Ghostbusters”
“The solution to online harrassment is simple: women should log off”
“Huma Abedin most likely a Saudi spy”
“Birth control makes women unattractive and crazy”
“Planned Parenthood’s body count under Cecile Richards up to half a holocaust”
“Gabby Giffords: the gun control movement’s human shield”
“half a holocaust”
Can someone do the maths and compare that to MCGs?
Surprise surprise, his marriages routinely end in acrimonious divorce:
Bannon’s first marriage was to Cathleen Houff Jordan. They had a daughter, Maureen. Following their divorce, Bannon married former investment banker Mary Louise Piccard in April 1995. Their twin daughters were born three days later. After Piccard and Bannon divorced in 1997, Bannon married Diane Clohesy. That marriage also ended in divorce in 2009.
Bannon was charged with misdemeanor domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness in early January 1996, after Piccard accused Bannon of domestic abuse. The charges were later dropped when his now ex-wife did not show up to court. Piccard also stated that Bannon had made antisemitic remarks about choice of schools, saying that he did not want to send his children to The Archer School for Girls because Jews raise their children to be “whiny brats”. Bannon’s spokesperson denied the accusation, noting that he had chosen to send both his children to the Archer School. Bannon’s association with the alt-right movement, along with his aforementioned alleged antisemitic remarks, have contributed to accusations of white nationalism from the Southern Poverty Law Center and other advocacy groups, commentators, and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid.[
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Bannon#Personal_life
Bubblecar said:
Surprise surprise, his marriages routinely end in acrimonious divorce:Bannon’s first marriage was to Cathleen Houff Jordan. They had a daughter, Maureen. Following their divorce, Bannon married former investment banker Mary Louise Piccard in April 1995. Their twin daughters were born three days later. After Piccard and Bannon divorced in 1997, Bannon married Diane Clohesy. That marriage also ended in divorce in 2009.
Bannon was charged with misdemeanor domestic violence, battery and dissuading a witness in early January 1996, after Piccard accused Bannon of domestic abuse. The charges were later dropped when his now ex-wife did not show up to court. Piccard also stated that Bannon had made antisemitic remarks about choice of schools, saying that he did not want to send his children to The Archer School for Girls because Jews raise their children to be “whiny brats”. Bannon’s spokesperson denied the accusation, noting that he had chosen to send both his children to the Archer School. Bannon’s association with the alt-right movement, along with his aforementioned alleged antisemitic remarks, have contributed to accusations of white nationalism from the Southern Poverty Law Center and other advocacy groups, commentators, and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid.
No doubt about it, the far left are as bad as the far right. Both got big shovels to dig up the dirt.
PermeateFree said:
No doubt about it, the far left are as bad as the far right.
Bullshit.
dv said:
PermeateFree said:No doubt about it, the far left are as bad as the far right.
Bullshit.
Well you dig up enough of it.
>No doubt about it, the far left are as bad as the far right. Both got big shovels to dig up the dirt.
My politics are not “far left”.
Bubblecar said:
>No doubt about it, the far left are as bad as the far right. Both got big shovels to dig up the dirt.My politics are not “far left”.
You got a very big shovel though.
Bubblecar said:
>No doubt about it, the far left are as bad as the far right. Both got big shovels to dig up the dirt.My politics are not “far left”.
And this isn’t a matter of anyone digging anything up, let alone by the left or the far left.
The facts of Bannon’s life and career are public record. He’s despised by people of all political stripes because of it.
I can’t even imagine what kind of cretin would leap to his defence.
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
>No doubt about it, the far left are as bad as the far right. Both got big shovels to dig up the dirt.My politics are not “far left”.
And this isn’t a matter of anyone digging anything up, let alone by the left or the far left.
The facts of Bannon’s life and career are public record. He’s despised by people of all political stripes because of it.
I can’t even imagine what kind of cretin would leap to his defence.
Sorry Mr Super-ego, I am not leaping to anyone’s defense, just sick of you lot digging up the dirt. You are a grubby little group.
dv said:
PermeateFree said:No doubt about it, the far left are as bad as the far right.
Bullshit.
thanks dv.
So it’s “grubby” to draw attention to the kind of swamp-life who’ll now be running a superpower?
I mean by my count there are now three people announced in Trump’s cabinet with a history of violence against women: not counting himself.
PermeateFree said:
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
>No doubt about it, the far left are as bad as the far right. Both got big shovels to dig up the dirt.My politics are not “far left”.
And this isn’t a matter of anyone digging anything up, let alone by the left or the far left.
The facts of Bannon’s life and career are public record. He’s despised by people of all political stripes because of it.
I can’t even imagine what kind of cretin would leap to his defence.
Sorry Mr Super-ego, I am not leaping to anyone’s defense, just sick of you lot digging up the dirt. You are a grubby little group.
Shouldn’t people holding positions of power in politics not be racist scumbags regardless of whatever political leanings they have. Many don’t seem decent at all and care only about feathering their own nests
dv said:
PermeateFree said:No doubt about it, the far left are as bad as the far right.
Bullshit.
History would suggest that PF is correct.
Peak Warming Man said:
History would suggest that PF is correct.
Dv meant that it was a bullshit response. The “far left” have nothing to do with mainstream criticism of Trump and his sinister pals.
Bubblecar said:
So it’s “grubby” to draw attention to the kind of swamp-life who’ll now be running a superpower?
What about the swamp life of the Clinton’s if you want to be pedantic. Remember there were only two people you could vote for. Wonders what you would be saying about Clinton if she had won?
I’d say I’m a typical centre-left liberal. Moderately left of centre, insistently liberal.
But even many Republicans know that Trump and Co are not remotely respectable critters, or remotely appropriate leadership for the US.
Bubblecar said:
Peak Warming Man said:
History would suggest that PF is correct.
Dv meant that it was a bullshit response. The “far left” have nothing to do with mainstream criticism of Trump and his sinister pals.
Admittedly it does reduce as you move to the middle. Where do you place yourself?
Bubblecar said:
I’d say I’m a typical centre-left liberal. Moderately left of centre, insistently liberal.
Think you delude yourself.
Bubblecar said:
So it’s “grubby” to draw attention to the kind of swamp-life who’ll now be running a superpower?
they have a few months to clean themselves up.
http://brilliantmaps.com/did-not-vote/
sarahs mum said:
http://brilliantmaps.com/did-not-vote/
voter turnout in NZ..where it is compulsory to enrol but not to vote.
http://www.elections.org.nz/events/2014-general-election/election-results-and-reporting/2014-general-election-voter-turnout
Cybersecurity CEO Gets Fired After Threatening To Kill Trump On Facebook
I think the Secret service will be very busy keeping bullets away from Trump by the sounds of things
Must be a few not on Facebook who might be thinking along the same lines
CrazyNeutrino said:
Cybersecurity CEO Gets Fired After Threatening To Kill Trump On FacebookI think the Secret service will be very busy keeping bullets away from Trump by the sounds of things
Must be a few not on Facebook who might be thinking along the same lines
Excellent idea. Now he’s angry, unemployed and got lots of spare time :/
party_pants said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Cybersecurity CEO Gets Fired After Threatening To Kill Trump On FacebookI think the Secret service will be very busy keeping bullets away from Trump by the sounds of things
Must be a few not on Facebook who might be thinking along the same lines
Excellent idea. Now he’s angry, unemployed and got lots of spare time :/
Not much of a Cyber security CEO if he doesn’t know about Facebook and the Media
No surprises if the Secret Service hire more people
That’s ridiculous, you can’t kill someone on Facebook
dv said:
In case people forgot how peacefully people accepted Obama’s election in ’08:
They’re just a Bunch of Racists
they don’t look like Professional Protestors to me
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
In case people forgot how peacefully people accepted Obama’s election in ’08:They’re just a Bunch of Racists
they don’t look like Professional Protestors to me
nowt worse than amateurs
Some wag pointed out that since Trump was born a hundred-millionaire and started out in his father’s business until the latter died, the very first job that he ever applied for was President of the United States.
dv said:
Some wag pointed out that since Trump was born a hundred-millionaire and started out in his father’s business until the latter died, the very first job that he ever applied for was President of the United States.
Probably correct.
Some other wag pointed out that POTUS shouldn’t be an entry level job.
I wonder if little hands printed on bikinis would sell?
CrazyNeutrino said:
I wonder if little hands printed on bikinis would sell?
Not a good idea?
Comment on the Guardian.
“The problem is that you’ve been calling people sexist and racist on flimsy pretexts for so long that now, when someone who actually is those things turns up, nobody listens.”
I found some interesting bikinis.

Guess who’s in the bikini?
none of you get my jokes
http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity/celebrity-news/salma-hayek-says-donald-trump-harassed-her-planted-tabloid-gossip-when-she-refused-his-advances-20161023-gs8ijp.html
Salma Hayek has joined the chorus of women speaking out about being harassed by Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.
Speaking on a Spanish-language radio program in the US, the Mexican-American actress revealed that she refused to go on a date with Trump years ago when she had a boyfriend, but he continued to pursue her – and claimed he even planted a story with celebrity gossip magazine National Enquirer.

CrazyNeutrino said:
Guess who’s in the bikini?
et vou?
i hope these protests don’t get out of hand as the ones after abe was elected did.
roughbarked said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Guess who’s in the bikini?et vou?
Sarah Palin.
JudgeMental said:
i hope these protests don’t get out of hand as the ones after abe was elected did.
Shinzo?
JudgeMental said:
i hope these protests don’t get out of hand as the ones after abe was elected did.
Those second amendment folks might get disgruntled when Trump back-pedals on so much of his agenda.
dv said:
JudgeMental said:
i hope these protests don’t get out of hand as the ones after abe was elected did.
Shinzo?
that’s a japanning.
CrazyNeutrino said:
roughbarked said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Guess who’s in the bikini?et vou?
Sarah Palin.
looks like holding the gun must be poking her in the ribs or something.
Witty Rejoinder said:
JudgeMental said:
i hope these protests don’t get out of hand as the ones after abe was elected did.
Those second amendment folks might get disgruntled when Trump back-pedals on so much of his agenda.
I’ll bookmark back flips
CrazyNeutrino said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
JudgeMental said:
i hope these protests don’t get out of hand as the ones after abe was elected did.
Those second amendment folks might get disgruntled when Trump back-pedals on so much of his agenda.
I’ll bookmark back flips
by Trump?
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Those second amendment folks might get disgruntled when Trump back-pedals on so much of his agenda.
I’ll bookmark back flips
by Trump?
Ill call it Trump Back flips
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:I’ll bookmark back flips
by Trump?
Ill call it Trump Back flips
The Bookmark Folder
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:I’ll bookmark back flips
by Trump?
Ill call it Trump Back flips
The Banning Muslim link disappeared from his Website
but has reappeared again
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:by Trump?
Ill call it Trump Back flips
The Banning Muslim link disappeared from his Website
but has reappeared again
He said he was going to get rid of Obama care
now says he will keep parts of it
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:Ill call it Trump Back flips
The Banning Muslim link disappeared from his Website
but has reappeared again
He said he was going to get rid of Obama care
now says he will keep parts of it
He can’t actually get rid of most of the stuff he promised.
This thread reminds me of a similar one on the KKK website the days after Obama got elected.
They were pretty angry too.
6/1 successful Trump impeachment before end of 2020:
http://www.paddypower.com/bet/politics/other-politics/us-politics?ev_oc_grp_ids=1614278
roughbarked said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:The Banning Muslim link disappeared from his Website
but has reappeared again
He said he was going to get rid of Obama care
now says he will keep parts of it
He can’t actually get rid of most of the stuff he promised.
I think his Vice President will do much of the work, he will end up being a puppet on a string
a cowboy at the rodeo who at some stage will get flung off
Witty Rejoinder said:
6/1 successful Trump impeachment before end of 2020:http://www.paddypower.com/bet/politics/other-politics/us-politics?ev_oc_grp_ids=1614278
I wouldn’t take such odds.
Note that PP were so certain of a Clinton win that they paid out early.
Peak Warming Man said:
This thread reminds me of a similar one on the KKK website the days after Obama got elected.
They were pretty angry too.
2.5/10
You can do better than that
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
This thread reminds me of a similar one on the KKK website the days after Obama got elected.
They were pretty angry too.
2.5/10
You can do better than that
he’s angry and not thinking straight.
He can’t actually fuck 7 million people to death in his first year in office.
Member Berries
Seems Turnbull’s decided: “I’ve blown any credibility I had with progressive people, so I may as well go full Nazi.”
Bubblecar said:
Seems Turnbull’s decided: “I’ve blown any credibility I had with progressive people, so I may as well go full Nazi.”
Easy for him to make friends with Trump then.
CrazyNeutrino said:
I think his Vice President will do much of the work, he will end up being a puppet on a string
That’s what i said.
After Pearl Harbour, Admiral Yamamoto said that he could run wild for six to twelve months, but then matters would be out of his hands. After Election Day, Trump has six to twelve months before the forces of conservatism and capital recover from the shock of Trump’s win, and attach the strings to his limbs.

Bubblecar said:
Seems Turnbull’s decided: “I’ve blown any credibility I had with progressive people, so I may as well go full Nazi.”
Malcolm’s disillusioned. His inability to organise a coherent and unified LNP govt (a genuine desire), and his increasing irrelevance to events, has disappointed him, and he knows he’s not getting a second term.
One thing that will be different after this…
Previously presidential candidates passed a public vetting process that tended to weed out people with some kind of personal or financial scandal, or who were on record as saying something inappropriate, or didn’t have quite enough experience. I’m thinking of Gingrich’s affairs, or Jesse Jackson’s use of the phrase Hymietown, or John Glenn’s involvement with the saving and loans scandal. These were all considered to be major impediments to running for president. Even GWB’s drink driving convictions were thought by some to be a problem. People said Sarah Palin was too inexperienced to be VICE president despite thirteen years in elected office as councillor, mayor and governor.
All of that must be finished now. Once you’ve elected someone who published an autobiography about being a serial philanderer, has been involved in more dodgy businesses than Al Capone, has said a laundry list of things no decent person could abide by and has not had a day in elected office or seemingly spent a day brushing up on high school Civics, there is no need for any vetting. The bar can’t be low enough. There is no bar.
Where are the conspiracy theorists, claiming that Trump didn’t win the election, but that’s what ‘the government’ wants you to think?
dv said:
One thing that will be different after this…Previously presidential candidates passed a public vetting process that tended to weed out people with some kind of personal or financial scandal, or who were on record as saying something inappropriate, or didn’t have quite enough experience. I’m thinking of Gingrich’s affairs, or Jesse Jackson’s use of the phrase Hymietown, or John Glenn’s involvement with the saving and loans scandal. These were all considered to be major impediments to running for president. Even GWB’s drink driving convictions were thought by some to be a problem. People said Sarah Palin was too inexperienced to be VICE president despite thirteen years in elected office as councillor, mayor and governor.
All of that must be finished now. Once you’ve elected someone who published an autobiography about being a serial philanderer, has been involved in more dodgy businesses than Al Capone, has said a laundry list of things no decent person could abide by and has not had a day in elected office or seemingly spent a day brushing up on high school Civics, there is no need for any vetting. The bar can’t be low enough. There is no bar.
Well that’s just depressing.
mcgoon said:
Where are the conspiracy theorists, claiming that Trump didn’t win the election, but that’s what ‘the government’ wants you to think?
Trump said all along that the media and the election were rigged.
mcgoon said:
Where are the conspiracy theorists, claiming that Trump didn’t win the election, but that’s what ‘the government’ wants you to think?
On political forums the more Americans voted for Clinton is being pushed pretty hard as reason to discredit the election result as illegitimate.
dv said:
One thing that will be different after this…Previously presidential candidates passed a public vetting process that tended to weed out people with some kind of personal or financial scandal, or who were on record as saying something inappropriate, or didn’t have quite enough experience. I’m thinking of Gingrich’s affairs, or Jesse Jackson’s use of the phrase Hymietown, or John Glenn’s involvement with the saving and loans scandal. These were all considered to be major impediments to running for president. Even GWB’s drink driving convictions were thought by some to be a problem. People said Sarah Palin was too inexperienced to be VICE president despite thirteen years in elected office as councillor, mayor and governor.
All of that must be finished now. Once you’ve elected someone who published an autobiography about being a serial philanderer, has been involved in more dodgy businesses than Al Capone, has said a laundry list of things no decent person could abide by and has not had a day in elected office or seemingly spent a day brushing up on high school Civics, there is no need for any vetting. The bar can’t be low enough. There is no bar.
Any American can become President.
Even if he/she is a philandering, inexperienced, ignorant, narcissistic, swindling idiot.
The American dream lives,
dv said:
One thing that will be different after this…Previously presidential candidates passed a public vetting process that tended to weed out people with some kind of personal or financial scandal, or who were on record as saying something inappropriate, or didn’t have quite enough experience. I’m thinking of Gingrich’s affairs, or Jesse Jackson’s use of the phrase Hymietown, or John Glenn’s involvement with the saving and loans scandal. These were all considered to be major impediments to running for president. Even GWB’s drink driving convictions were thought by some to be a problem. People said Sarah Palin was too inexperienced to be VICE president despite thirteen years in elected office as councillor, mayor and governor.
All of that must be finished now. Once you’ve elected someone who published an autobiography about being a serial philanderer, has been involved in more dodgy businesses than Al Capone, has said a laundry list of things no decent person could abide by and has not had a day in elected office or seemingly spent a day brushing up on high school Civics, there is no need for any vetting. The bar can’t be low enough. There is no bar.
Trump has certainly lowered the bar
Has he damaged America?
or
Will he Damage America ?
AwesomeO said:
mcgoon said:
Where are the conspiracy theorists, claiming that Trump didn’t win the election, but that’s what ‘the government’ wants you to think?
On political forums the more Americans voted for Clinton is being pushed pretty hard as reason to discredit the election result as illegitimate.
Well, it’s not, thanks to their bizarre system of having a second election among 50 or so voters after the big election has taken place.
http://www.ibtimes.com/election-violence-2016-most-anti-trump-protesters-arrested-oregon-didnt-vote-2446346
olice arrested 112 people in Portland, Oregon this weekend after demonstrations against the recent election of Republican Donald Trump in the city’s downtown area turned violent. But at least 69 of them did not vote on Election Day — or were not even registered to vote in the state, according to an analysis by local station KGW.KGW compared the names and ages of those arrested Saturday to Multnomah County Elections Division’ state voter logs and found that 34 of them did not cast a vote last Tuesday, and an additional 35 were not registered to vote. Only 25 of the arrested protesters voted, though KGW has yet to verify the remaining 17. The final suspect voted out of state.
—-
dv said:
http://www.ibtimes.com/election-violence-2016-most-anti-trump-protesters-arrested-oregon-didnt-vote-2446346 olice arrested 112 people in Portland, Oregon this weekend after demonstrations against the recent election of Republican Donald Trump in the city’s downtown area turned violent. But at least 69 of them did not vote on Election Day — or were not even registered to vote in the state, according to an analysis by local station KGW.KGW compared the names and ages of those arrested Saturday to Multnomah County Elections Division’ state voter logs and found that 34 of them did not cast a vote last Tuesday, and an additional 35 were not registered to vote. Only 25 of the arrested protesters voted, though KGW has yet to verify the remaining 17. The final suspect voted out of state.
—-
A lot of Bernie supporters vowed they wouldn’t vote for Hillary.
Madness.
dv said:
http://www.ibtimes.com/election-violence-2016-most-anti-trump-protesters-arrested-oregon-didnt-vote-2446346 olice arrested 112 people in Portland, Oregon this weekend after demonstrations against the recent election of Republican Donald Trump in the city’s downtown area turned violent. But at least 69 of them did not vote on Election Day — or were not even registered to vote in the state, according to an analysis by local station KGW.KGW compared the names and ages of those arrested Saturday to Multnomah County Elections Division’ state voter logs and found that 34 of them did not cast a vote last Tuesday, and an additional 35 were not registered to vote. Only 25 of the arrested protesters voted, though KGW has yet to verify the remaining 17. The final suspect voted out of state.
—-
So it’s not secret voting either.
I don’t think I approve. Can you check here who got marked off to vote?
buffy said:
dv said:
http://www.ibtimes.com/election-violence-2016-most-anti-trump-protesters-arrested-oregon-didnt-vote-2446346 olice arrested 112 people in Portland, Oregon this weekend after demonstrations against the recent election of Republican Donald Trump in the city’s downtown area turned violent. But at least 69 of them did not vote on Election Day — or were not even registered to vote in the state, according to an analysis by local station KGW.KGW compared the names and ages of those arrested Saturday to Multnomah County Elections Division’ state voter logs and found that 34 of them did not cast a vote last Tuesday, and an additional 35 were not registered to vote. Only 25 of the arrested protesters voted, though KGW has yet to verify the remaining 17. The final suspect voted out of state.
—-So it’s not secret voting either.
I don’t think I approve. Can you check here who got marked off to vote?
Given that those who don’t vote are sent fines, yes
Mind you there really is not much point in voting in Oregon wrt the presidential election
Divine Angel said:
dv said:
One thing that will be different after this…Previously presidential candidates passed a public vetting process that tended to weed out people with some kind of personal or financial scandal, or who were on record as saying something inappropriate, or didn’t have quite enough experience. I’m thinking of Gingrich’s affairs, or Jesse Jackson’s use of the phrase Hymietown, or John Glenn’s involvement with the saving and loans scandal. These were all considered to be major impediments to running for president. Even GWB’s drink driving convictions were thought by some to be a problem. People said Sarah Palin was too inexperienced to be VICE president despite thirteen years in elected office as councillor, mayor and governor.
All of that must be finished now. Once you’ve elected someone who published an autobiography about being a serial philanderer, has been involved in more dodgy businesses than Al Capone, has said a laundry list of things no decent person could abide by and has not had a day in elected office or seemingly spent a day brushing up on high school Civics, there is no need for any vetting. The bar can’t be low enough. There is no bar.
Well that’s just depressing.
but it’s the truth.
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
http://www.ibtimes.com/election-violence-2016-most-anti-trump-protesters-arrested-oregon-didnt-vote-2446346 olice arrested 112 people in Portland, Oregon this weekend after demonstrations against the recent election of Republican Donald Trump in the city’s downtown area turned violent. But at least 69 of them did not vote on Election Day — or were not even registered to vote in the state, according to an analysis by local station KGW.KGW compared the names and ages of those arrested Saturday to Multnomah County Elections Division’ state voter logs and found that 34 of them did not cast a vote last Tuesday, and an additional 35 were not registered to vote. Only 25 of the arrested protesters voted, though KGW has yet to verify the remaining 17. The final suspect voted out of state.
—-
A lot of Bernie supporters vowed they wouldn’t vote for Hillary.
Madness.
I know one of these. But she had reasons and convictions which is more than can be said for some.
sarahs mum said:
But she had reasons and convictions
Is she still content?
opps
dv said:
sarahs mum said:But she had reasons and convictions
Is she still content?
Nup. But she wasn’t going to be happy with Clinton or Trump. She would have voted Berney. She ended up voting for Jill.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
sarahs mum said:But she had reasons and convictions
Is she still content?
Nup. But she wasn’t going to be happy with Clinton or Trump. She would have voted Berney. She ended up voting for Jill.
crazy
dv said:
sarahs mum said:
dv said:Is she still content?
Nup. But she wasn’t going to be happy with Clinton or Trump. She would have voted Berney. She ended up voting for Jill.
crazy
I’m not upset with her. I still have three Trump supporters on my facebook to be upset with.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2016/11/there_is_no_such_thing_as_a_good_trump_voter.html
People voted for a racist who promised racist outcomes. They don’t deserve your empathy.
Donald Trump ran a campaign of racist demagoguery against Muslim Americans, Hispanic immigrants, and black protesters. He indulged the worst instincts of the American psyche and winked to the stream of white nationalists and anti-Semites who backed his bid for the White House. Millions of Americans voted for this campaign, thus elevating white nationalism and white reaction to the Oval Office.
Jamelle Bouie
Jamelle Bouie is Slate’s chief political correspondent.
—-
Excerpts
Donald Trump ran a campaign of racist demagoguery against Muslim Americans, Hispanic immigrants, and black protesters. He indulged the worst instincts of the American psyche and winked to the stream of white nationalists and anti-Semites who backed his bid for the White House. Millions of Americans voted for this campaign, thus elevating white nationalism and white reaction to the Oval Office.Understandably, critics of Trump have used this to condemn Trump voters, tying them to the likely consequences of their vote, blaming them for foisting Donald Trump on the country and the world. To this, there’s been a pushback. “lease understand what is happening here,” writes Michael Lerner in the New York Times in a column titled “Stop Shaming Trump Supporters.” “Many Trump supporters very legitimately feel that it is they who have been facing an unfair reality.” He continues: “The left needs to stop ignoring people’s inner pain and fear. The racism, sexism and xenophobia used by Mr. Trump to advance his candidacy does not reveal an inherent malice in the majority of Americans.”
Whether Trump’s election reveals an “inherent malice” in his voters is irrelevant. What is relevant are the practical outcomes of a Trump presidency. Trump campaigned on state repression of disfavored minorities. He gives every sign that he plans to deliver that repression. This will mean disadvantage, immiseration, and violence for real people, people whose “inner pain and fear” were not reckoned worthy of many-thousand-word magazine feature stories. If you voted for Trump, you voted for this, regardless of what you believe about the groups in question. That you have black friends or Latino colleagues, that you think yourself to be tolerant and decent, doesn’t change the fact that you voted for racist policy that may affect, change, or harm their lives. And on that score, your frustration at being labeled a racist doesn’t justify or mitigate the moral weight of your political choice.In the same way that the election-year demand for empathy toward Trump supporters obscured the consequences of Trump’s support for his targets, this demand for empathy does the same. It’s worse, in fact. In the wake of Trump’s win, the United States was hit with a wave of racist threats, agitation, harassment, and violence, following a year in which hate crimes against Muslim Americans and others reached historic highs. With Trump in office, millions of Americans face the prospect of a federal government that is hostile to their presence in this country, and which views them as an intrusion, even if they are citizens. Even if they’ve lived their entire lives as Americans.
To face those facts and then demand empathy for the people who made them a reality—who backed racist demagoguery, whatever their reasons—is to declare Trump’s victims less worthy of attention than his enablers. To insist Trump’s backers are good people is to treat their inner lives with more weight than the actual lives on the line under a Trump administration. At best, it’s myopic and solipsistic. At worst, it’s morally grotesque.
If there is no such thing as a good Trump voter then more than half the American population is bad. Seems a bit extreme to me.
Dinnergate.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/blogs/tim-blair/dinnergate/news-story/3cea8b192eb24bc59c0490e6842d4887
Tamb said:
If there is no such thing as a good Trump voter then more than half the American population is bad. Seems a bit extreme to me.
only just under a quarter of the population voted for him…
Tamb said:
If there is no such thing as a good Trump voter then more than half the American population is bad. Seems a bit extreme to me.
The headline is clickbait, the article is substantive.
Tamb said:
If there is no such thing as a good Trump voter then more than half the American population is bad. Seems a bit extreme to me.
maybe the president thing’s got a problem
An inform Mark Latham tees off.
https://youtu.be/u77Jmuf_Z1g
transition said:
Tamb said:
If there is no such thing as a good Trump voter then more than half the American population is bad. Seems a bit extreme to me.
maybe the president thing’s got a problem
The bottom line is ownership. People have to own the consequences of their decisions. The article closes:
“One can be, indeed one must strive to become, tough and philosophical concerning destruction and death, for this is what most of mankind has been best at since we have heard of man,” wrote James Baldwin in his seminal work, The Fire Next Time. “But it is not permissible that the authors of devastation should also be innocent. It is the innocence which constitutes the crime.” We can hope Trump was bluffing about his promises. If not, then the next four years will be hard for the Americans he plans to target. What we cannot do is pretend this wasn’t a choice, that no one was responsible.
diddly-squat said:
Tamb said:
If there is no such thing as a good Trump voter then more than half the American population is bad. Seems a bit extreme to me.
only just under a quarter of the population voted for him…
The election… is that old thing still around?
transition said:
Tamb said:
If there is no such thing as a good Trump voter then more than half the American population is bad. Seems a bit extreme to me.
maybe the president thing’s got a problem
Tamb said:
diddly-squat said:
Tamb said:
If there is no such thing as a good Trump voter then more than half the American population is bad. Seems a bit extreme to me.
only just under a quarter of the population voted for him…
More eligible voters voted for him than those who voted for Hillary.
Well no, Hillary got about a million more votes … not that it matters much.
dv said:
Tamb said:
diddly-squat said:only just under a quarter of the population voted for him…
More eligible voters voted for him than those who voted for Hillary.Well no, Hillary got about a million more votes … not that it matters much.
Tamb said:
dv said:
Tamb said:More eligible voters voted for him than those who voted for Hillary.
Well no, Hillary got about a million more votes … not that it matters much.
Then how is he pres & not her. Is it to do with States?
Yes, they use an electoral college system whereby the winner of a state is allocated a certain number of electors. This is the fourth time that the winner of the popular vote has not won the election, the other instances being in 1876, 1888, 2000.
Peak Warming Man said:
An inform Mark Latham tees off.https://youtu.be/u77Jmuf_Z1g
Fuck he’s a dickhead.
We really dodged a bullet there.
Peak Warming Man said:
An inform Mark Latham
Not a phrase you see from PWM very often.
It is also possible in Australia for the winner of the popular vote to lose the election, does this happen often?
Peak Warming Man said:
Dinnergate.http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/blogs/tim-blair/dinnergate/news-story/3cea8b192eb24bc59c0490e6842d4887
Yeah I did think that was over the top.
furious said:
- This is the fourth time that the winner of the popular vote has not won the election, the other instances being in 1876, 1888, 2000.
It is also possible in Australia for the winner of the popular vote to lose the election, does this happen often?
Didn’t we discuss this just a few days ago?
Tamb said:
diddly-squat said:
Tamb said:
If there is no such thing as a good Trump voter then more than half the American population is bad. Seems a bit extreme to me.
only just under a quarter of the population voted for him…
More eligible voters voted for him than those who voted for Hillary.
no actually…
Hills got a higher proportion of the popular vote.. The Donald just won more of the Electoral College…
furious said:
- This is the fourth time that the winner of the popular vote has not won the election, the other instances being in 1876, 1888, 2000.
It is also possible in Australia for the winner of the popular vote to lose the election, does this happen often?
It has happened six times in Australia that the winner of the 2 party preferred vote did not win the election.
What do you mean “we”?
That kind of thing does happen a lot around here though…
furious said:
- Didn’t we discuss this just a few days ago?
What do you mean “we”?
We the people of Ex-SSSFia.
dv said:
furious said:
- This is the fourth time that the winner of the popular vote has not won the election, the other instances being in 1876, 1888, 2000.
It is also possible in Australia for the winner of the popular vote to lose the election, does this happen often?
It has happened six times in Australia that the winner of the 2 party preferred vote did not win the election.
but it’s really comparable IMO… in the US it’s straight up FPTP, while here it’s full preferential voting…
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
furious said:
- This is the fourth time that the winner of the popular vote has not won the election, the other instances being in 1876, 1888, 2000.
It is also possible in Australia for the winner of the popular vote to lose the election, does this happen often?
It has happened six times in Australia that the winner of the 2 party preferred vote did not win the election.
but it’s not really comparable IMO… in the US it’s straight up FPTP, while here it’s full preferential voting…
fixed
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
furious said:
- This is the fourth time that the winner of the popular vote has not won the election, the other instances being in 1876, 1888, 2000.
It is also possible in Australia for the winner of the popular vote to lose the election, does this happen often?
It has happened six times in Australia that the winner of the 2 party preferred vote did not win the election.
but it’s really comparable IMO… in the US it’s straight up FPTP, while here it’s full preferential voting…
did you mean to put a “not” in somewhere?
Maine has a form of preferential voting.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:It has happened six times in Australia that the winner of the 2 party preferred vote did not win the election.
but it’s not really comparable IMO… in the US it’s straight up FPTP, while here it’s full preferential voting…
did you mean to put a “not” in somewhere?
yes…
Trump hasn’t actually won yet.
The meeting of the 538 voters of the Electoral college doesn’t happen until the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December after the presidential election (really, it’s true).
There’s nothing to stop a majority of the Electoral College voters deciding to vote for Clinton, and give her the Presidency. Not all that likely, but by no means impossible.
Peak Warming Man said:
Maine has a form of preferential voting.
That will be an interesting experiment, to see how Americans deal with that.
diddly-squat said:
but it’s really comparable IMO… in the US it’s straight up FPTP, while here it’s full preferential voting…
No, it isn’t – see my previous post.
mcgoon said:
Trump hasn’t actually won yet.The meeting of the 538 voters of the Electoral college doesn’t happen until the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December after the presidential election (really, it’s true).
There’s nothing to stop a majority of the Electoral College voters deciding to vote for Clinton, and give her the Presidency. Not all that likely, but by no means impossible.
I think you are clutching at the straw that broke the camel’s back
mcgoon said:
Trump hasn’t actually won yet.The meeting of the 538 voters of the Electoral college doesn’t happen until the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December after the presidential election (really, it’s true).
There’s nothing to stop a majority of the Electoral College voters deciding to vote for Clinton, and give her the Presidency. Not all that likely, but by no means impossible.
…and bbbbbbaby you aint seen nothing yet.
mcgoon said:
Trump hasn’t actually won yet.The meeting of the 538 voters of the Electoral college doesn’t happen until the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December after the presidential election (really, it’s true).
There’s nothing to stop a majority of the Electoral College voters deciding to vote for Clinton, and give her the Presidency. Not all that likely, but by no means impossible.
have any Electors ever voted against the election results?
mcgoon said:
Trump hasn’t actually won yet.The meeting of the 538 voters of the Electoral college doesn’t happen until the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December after the presidential election (really, it’s true).
There’s nothing to stop a majority of the Electoral College voters deciding to vote for Clinton, and give her the Presidency. Not all that likely, but by no means impossible.
I hope they don’t.
The US Election 2016 is over. Everybody lost.
diddly-squat said:
mcgoon said:
Trump hasn’t actually won yet.The meeting of the 538 voters of the Electoral college doesn’t happen until the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December after the presidential election (really, it’s true).
There’s nothing to stop a majority of the Electoral College voters deciding to vote for Clinton, and give her the Presidency. Not all that likely, but by no means impossible.
have any Electors ever voted against the election results?
There have been over a hundred instances of an elector going against his state result but none of them have determined the outcome of an election.
Seeing as we’re still talking US elections:
The general consensus seems to be that although Trump is an idiot and an arse-hole, Clinton is a pathological liar.
Is there actually any good evidence for her having a level of untruthfulness any greater than the typical politician?
The only detailed discussion I have seen on the matter suggested that she was actually pretty good on the truthfulness front (and Trump was the biggest liar ever, by a mile), but that may have been biased of course.
dv said:
There have been over a hundred instances of an elector going against his state result but none of them have determined the outcome of an election.
Seems they need an extra rule in there somewhere.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
mcgoon said:
Trump hasn’t actually won yet.The meeting of the 538 voters of the Electoral college doesn’t happen until the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December after the presidential election (really, it’s true).
There’s nothing to stop a majority of the Electoral College voters deciding to vote for Clinton, and give her the Presidency. Not all that likely, but by no means impossible.
have any Electors ever voted against the election results?
There have been over a hundred instances of an elector going against his state result but none of them have determined the outcome of an election.
from wiki…
On 22 occasions, 179 electors have not cast their votes for President or Vice President as prescribed by the legislature of the state they represented. Of those, 71 electors changed their votes because the candidate to whom they were pledged died before the electoral ballot (1872, 1912). Two electors chose to abstain from voting for any candidate (1812, 2000). The remaining 106 were changed by the elector’s personal interest, or perhaps by accident. Usually, the faithless electors act alone. An exception was the 1836 election, in which all 23 Virginia electors acted together.
The 1836 election was the only occasion when faithless electors altered the outcome of the electoral college vote. The Democrat ticket won states with 170 of the 294 electoral votes, but the 23 Virginia electors abstained in the vote for Vice President, so the Democrat candidate, Richard Mentor Johnson, got only 147 (exactly half), and was not elected. However, Johnson was elected Vice President by the U.S. Senate.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Seeing as we’re still talking US elections:The general consensus seems to be that although Trump is an idiot and an arse-hole, Clinton is a pathological liar.
Is there actually any good evidence for her having a level of untruthfulness any greater than the typical politician?
The only detailed discussion I have seen on the matter suggested that she was actually pretty good on the truthfulness front (and Trump was the biggest liar ever, by a mile), but that may have been biased of course.
Hillary is a paragon of honesty compared with Trump.
But she’s told a few porkies now & then.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Seeing as we’re still talking US elections:The general consensus seems to be that although Trump is an idiot and an arse-hole, Clinton is a pathological liar.
Is there actually any good evidence for her having a level of untruthfulness any greater than the typical politician?
The only detailed discussion I have seen on the matter suggested that she was actually pretty good on the truthfulness front (and Trump was the biggest liar ever, by a mile), but that may have been biased of course.
Seems to me the real problem is that people support and vote for a particular party like they would follow a football team. No matter how bad a candidate might be they would rather continue to support their own team than switch sides. This stuff about Hillary is just as bad is really just a bit of cognitive dissonance, it is not a serious appraisal of her ability or integrity.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Seeing as we’re still talking US elections:The general consensus seems to be that although Trump is an idiot and an arse-hole, Clinton is a pathological liar.
Is there actually any good evidence for her having a level of untruthfulness any greater than the typical politician?
The only detailed discussion I have seen on the matter suggested that she was actually pretty good on the truthfulness front (and Trump was the biggest liar ever, by a mile), but that may have been biased of course.
All analyses of their speeches show that Trump is a habitual, continual liar, telling a direct lie on average about once per three minutes of speaking. More than half of the statements made by Trump under Politifact’s analysis were rated “mostly false” “false” or “pants on fire”. He’s not even subtle about it: he lies about things than anyone can check with a few seconds of research. He denies saying things he said in the previous week, even when there’s video: he denies saying things even when the person he’s talking to is the person he said them to.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/lists/people/comparing-hillary-clinton-donald-trump-truth-o-met/
Clinton
True (72)
Mostly True (76)
Half True ()
Mostly False (40)
False (29)
Pants on Fire (7)
Trump
True (14)
Mostly True (37)
Half True (50)
Mostly False (63)
False (113)
Pants on Fire (57)
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
There have been over a hundred instances of an elector going against his state result but none of them have determined the outcome of an election.
Seems they need an extra rule in there somewhere.
Yes. One of these days it is going to bite them.
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
dv said:
There have been over a hundred instances of an elector going against his state result but none of them have determined the outcome of an election.
Seems they need an extra rule in there somewhere.
Yes. One of these days it is going to bite them.
like most of the constitutional baggage, it’s outdated and no longer fit for purpose… but you know, it’s the constitution
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
Bubblecar said:Seems they need an extra rule in there somewhere.
Yes. One of these days it is going to bite them.
like most of the constitutional baggage, it’s outdated and no longer fit for purpose… but you know, it’s the constitution
like the existence of the Australian states…
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:Yes. One of these days it is going to bite them.
like most of the constitutional baggage, it’s outdated and no longer fit for purpose… but you know, it’s the constitution
like the existence of the Australian states…
IKR…
But DJT has indicated that he too thinks it should be by popular vote, so with the president against it and the opposition against it, it might fall.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
dv said:Yes. One of these days it is going to bite them.
like most of the constitutional baggage, it’s outdated and no longer fit for purpose… but you know, it’s the constitution
like the existence of the Australian states…
What would you like the country of FNQ called when it secedes?
FNQ wont do.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:like most of the constitutional baggage, it’s outdated and no longer fit for purpose… but you know, it’s the constitution
like the existence of the Australian states…
What would you like the country of FNQ called when it secedes?
FNQ wont do.
Fk the states…
furious said:
- This is the fourth time that the winner of the popular vote has not won the election, the other instances being in 1876, 1888, 2000.
It is also possible in Australia for the winner of the popular vote to lose the election, does this happen often?
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:like most of the constitutional baggage, it’s outdated and no longer fit for purpose… but you know, it’s the constitution
like the existence of the Australian states…
What would you like the country of FNQ called when it secedes?
FNQ wont do.
Roberttownsslaveplantationland
Here’s what Trump said in interview the other day.
Lesley Stahl: Now, for months, you were running around saying that the system is rigged, the whole thing was rigged. You tweeted once that the Electoral College is a disaster for democracy.
Donald Trump: I do.
Lesley Stahl: So do you still think it’s rigged?
Donald Trump: Well, I think the electoral co— look, I won with the Electoral College.
Lesley Stahl: Exactly.But do you think—
Donald Trump: You know, it’s—
Lesley Stahl: —it’s rigged?
Donald Trump: Yeah, some of the election locations are. Some of the system is. I hated—
Lesley Stahl: Even though you won you’re saying that—
Donald Trump: I hated— well, you know, I’m not going to change my mind just because I won. But I would rather see it where you went with simple votes. You know, you get 100 million votes and somebody else gets 90 million votes and you win. There’s a reason for doing this because it brings all the states into play. Electoral College and there’s something very good about that. But this is a different system. But I respect it. I do respect the system.
Tamb said:
furious said:
- This is the fourth time that the winner of the popular vote has not won the election, the other instances being in 1876, 1888, 2000.
It is also possible in Australia for the winner of the popular vote to lose the election, does this happen often?
Here it’s to do with the number of seats won. If the electoral boundaries are set correctly then it shouldn’t happen.
With exactly equal sized electorates you could still have someone winning an election with just over 25% of the total vote.
Tamb said:
furious said:
- This is the fourth time that the winner of the popular vote has not won the election, the other instances being in 1876, 1888, 2000.
It is also possible in Australia for the winner of the popular vote to lose the election, does this happen often?
Here it’s to do with the number of seats won. If the electoral boundaries are set correctly then it shouldn’t happen.
Nah … that’s not correct. Even with electoral boundaries perfect, it can still happen.
It shouldn’t happen that you win with like 40% but it is inevitable that sometimes people will win with between 49 and 49.9% and that has been what has happened.
diddly-squat said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:like the existence of the Australian states…
What would you like the country of FNQ called when it secedes?
FNQ wont do.
Fk the states…
Catchy
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:
furious said:
- This is the fourth time that the winner of the popular vote has not won the election, the other instances being in 1876, 1888, 2000.
It is also possible in Australia for the winner of the popular vote to lose the election, does this happen often?
Here it’s to do with the number of seats won. If the electoral boundaries are set correctly then it shouldn’t happen.With exactly equal sized electorates you could still have someone winning an election with just over 25% of the total vote.
>../cut/….This stuff about Hillary is just as bad is really just a bit of cognitive dissonance, it is not a serious appraisal of her ability or integrity…./cut/..”
A goodly part true. Politicians become something frustrations are projected onto. An avenue, to vent off, days and years of sublimation, repression. Twisted territory, some bad, and a lot of potential for good.
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:Here it’s to do with the number of seats won. If the electoral boundaries are set correctly then it shouldn’t happen.
With exactly equal sized electorates you could still have someone winning an election with just over 25% of the total vote.
Wouldn’t the preferential system eliminate that unless you mean 25% of primary vote?
He means 25% of the two party preferred.
Shit, you could win election in Australia with 1% of the primary vote, theoretically.
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:Here it’s to do with the number of seats won. If the electoral boundaries are set correctly then it shouldn’t happen.
With exactly equal sized electorates you could still have someone winning an election with just over 25% of the total vote.
Wouldn’t the preferential system eliminate that unless you mean 25% of primary vote?
No, you could have someone getting 51% of the vote in 51% of the electorates (after preferences), and 0% in the other 49% of electorates, giving them just over a quarter of the votes overall.
Yanks should probably rethink election day Tuesday as well..
America was still a largely agrarian society and farmers would travel to the nearest major town by horse and cart to cast their ballot. It was a trip that could take a whole day in some places.
Friday, Saturday and Sunday were considered days of worship, so they were out. The diary was also full on Wednesday. That was market day.
So, that left Monday and Tuesday. Folks would leave the farm on a Monday and travel through the day, arriving in time to cast their ballot on Tuesday before heading back to sell their fruit and vegetables on Wednesday.
Ian said:
Yanks should probably rethink election day Tuesday as well..
Yep, I reckon a sausage sizzle at every polling place would soothe people and help with good decisions.
kii said:
Ian said:
Yanks should probably rethink election day Tuesday as well..Yep, I reckon a sausage sizzle at every polling place would soothe people and help with good decisions.
They should also have a federal electoral commission to determine boundaries and conduct elections …
dv said:
kii said:
Ian said:
Yanks should probably rethink election day Tuesday as well..Yep, I reckon a sausage sizzle at every polling place would soothe people and help with good decisions.
They should also have a federal electoral commission to determine boundaries and conduct elections …
Yeah, probably something like that might help *shrug *
dv said:
kii said:
Ian said:
Yanks should probably rethink election day Tuesday as well..Yep, I reckon a sausage sizzle at every polling place would soothe people and help with good decisions.
They should also have a federal electoral commission to determine boundaries and conduct elections …
There must be a way of franchising out democracy sausages and making a motza..
Also I guess the other thing is that people should choose not to vote for someone who is obviously not an appropriate candidate, that would help too.
dv said:
Also I guess the other thing is that people should choose not to vote for someone who is obviously not an appropriate candidate, that would help too.
roffle..
you’re such the optimist
dv said:
Also I guess the other thing is that people should choose not to vote for someone who is obviously not an appropriate candidate, that would help too.
You could probably throw a dart in a random crowd of people in the street and get a better politician than most of those in power now, the country would be irrelevant.
dv said:
Also I guess the other thing is that people should choose not to vote for someone who is obviously not an appropriate candidate, that would help too.
Oh well, how much damage can Trump do in four years?
.~
Cymek said:
dv said:
Also I guess the other thing is that people should choose not to vote for someone who is obviously not an appropriate candidate, that would help too.
You could probably throw a dart in a random crowd of people in the street and get a better politician than most of those in power now, the country would be irrelevant.
I think there are a lot of cynical views about pollies… but I really do believe that most of them (in Aust at least) are in it for largely altruistic reasons…
Ian said:
dv said:
Also I guess the other thing is that people should choose not to vote for someone who is obviously not an appropriate candidate, that would help too.
Oh well, how much damage can Trump do in four years?
.~
well I guess we’ll see
diddly-squat said:
Cymek said:
dv said:
Also I guess the other thing is that people should choose not to vote for someone who is obviously not an appropriate candidate, that would help too.
You could probably throw a dart in a random crowd of people in the street and get a better politician than most of those in power now, the country would be irrelevant.
I think there are a lot of cynical views about pollies… but I really do believe that most of them (in Aust at least) are in it for largely altruistic reasons…
more than half.
maybe not much more than half …
Ian said:
dv said:
Also I guess the other thing is that people should choose not to vote for someone who is obviously not an appropriate candidate, that would help too.
Oh well, how much damage can Trump do in four years?
.~
Playing wild, the dying children From the gutter they spawn A life created of indignation Pride and seeker pause Pig city, oil creation Over sex-dosed the junk machine crawls Missing is the laughter, from the death bus While the eternal human war rages on
Can you believe how little you care? The friendly face of the empire leader Conquest of style, ego hate Walk amongst the dogs While the violence kills the declined state
Have you eaten today? I am glad Your digestion is the sorrow of the hungry So tired of rejection and stupidity
Cut away to Grey man Isolation room, a crowd gathers Fade to riot, As the furore screams deliverance The claws of the predatory corporation dig deep into the naive religion culture Acceptance, blind virtue their reason taunts the absurd The beggar, he feeds the anger As you burn sorrow’s last word
Pain create the answer holy Learn the lesson passion learned Hate the teachers, oh so saintly I kiss the pyre as it burned
Our need flows on, but we feel nothing While emotion kills with no remorseful deathblow from Jesus Only you can turn the key to unlock the tortured riches inside your soul And find the reason we live
Like some sort of God rejection Place the blame on heads that turn You watch the dagger rip through masses As wheat and grain and corn dry into a hatred reality, screaming into a vengeful pit Pitiful scream!!
The heart goes forward hating Wanting life that cannot be attained Justice seeker, pray for vengeance The purist life is marred and stained
I want the World to heal
I want the world to love
But it cannot
4 More Years 4 More Years 4 More Years 4 More Years 4 More Years 4 More Years 4 More Years…
Stories from the book store:
Male customer asks me if I am a manager, because he wants to pass on a compliment about a bookseller.
So, as the manager comes over he starts off normal enough – blah blah…great service etc from the young man in music.
All cool, then he starts in on why he hasn’t been shopping at BN for a while. Apparently, and he heard this on the news, BN had been putting Ben Carson and Trump books in the kids’ section or the humour section and it was company policy.
The manager assured him that it wasn’t company policy and maybe he, you know, might have been confused.
“No, no. It is BN policy to do this! I saw it on the news.”
Anyway, I had walked off by the time it got to the nitty gritty, and when I caught up with the manager later I clarified that it had been a customer moving books around and then posting a photo of it on fb or Twitter or something.
http://the-digital-reader.com/2015/12/29/carsons-and-trumps-books-shelved-in-the-humor-section-at-bn/

>I think there are a lot of cynical views about pollies… but I really do believe that most of them (in Aust at least) are in it for largely altruistic reasons
much as altruism exists, other than as a motivational theory
people do though give, without expectation of anything immediate in return, but I think generally it’s to build some sort of capital, with it in mind later they may need something, which can be from a complete stranger.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA-UPrK_x-k
kii said:
Stories from the book store:Male customer asks me if I am a manager, because he wants to pass on a compliment about a bookseller.
So, as the manager comes over he starts off normal enough – blah blah…great service etc from the young man in music.
All cool, then he starts in on why he hasn’t been shopping at BN for a while. Apparently, and he heard this on the news, BN had been putting Ben Carson and Trump books in the kids’ section or the humour section and it was company policy.
The manager assured him that it wasn’t company policy and maybe he, you know, might have been confused.
“No, no. It is BN policy to do this! I saw it on the news.”
Anyway, I had walked off by the time it got to the nitty gritty, and when I caught up with the manager later I clarified that it had been a customer moving books around and then posting a photo of it on fb or Twitter or something.
http://the-digital-reader.com/2015/12/29/carsons-and-trumps-books-shelved-in-the-humor-section-at-bn/
That’s actually quite amusing
I wonder how many bands will write songs about Trump in the years to come, Bush was very popular as a subject matter
Cymek said:
I wonder how many bands will write songs about Trump in the years to come, Bush was very popular as a subject matter
So was Idi Amin.
http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/the-surge-of-pro-trump-fake-news-is-coming-from-macedonia/8003094
‘Wikileaks just killed Hillary’ … ‘Hillary indictment imminent’ … ‘Obama caught on live TV telling illegal aliens it’s OK to vote. Promises the law will not come after you!’ … ‘Hillary Clinton In 2013: “I Would Like To See People Like Donald Trump Run For Office; They’re Honest And Can’t Be Bought”’.
These are headlines from the few hundred fake news websites that have sprung up around the US election. The sites with names like WorldPoliticus.com, TrumpVision365.com, USConservativeToday.com, DonaldTrumpNews.co, and USADailyPolitics.com make money through sharing in Facebook ad revenue. Business is booming, and the centre of the fake news clickbait industry is the small town of Veles in Macedonia, apparently known for its porcelain. Here, young Macedonians reportedly earn thousands of dollars creating articles that are eagerly consumed by Trump supporters in America.
Hillary Clinton never said Donald Trump should run for office, but a story claiming she did exactly that (see headline above) has racked up hundreds of thousands of shares, reactions and comments. Other fake news articles have done almost as well, and together they have reached millions of people.
The stories tend to be either straight up fakes or are merely heavily biased – designed to confirm the prejudices and stir the passions of their readers. There’s an irony here. This election, we’ve heard a lot about the influence of Russia, about Putin ‘hacking’ the election and backing Trump, and of the sway of right-wing news channels like Fox. But the entrepreneurs in Veles are not about ideology or power games; their motivation is very American; it’s pure capitalism.
Why Veles?
Before this election, people in Veles were already making money through making Facebook content that would be be popular with Americans. Under the Facebook business model, publishers get a tiny proportion of the tiny amount of money that an advertiser pays for each click. Advertisers pay more per click in America than they do in Europe, because the average revenue per user is much higher (about $12.43 per user to $3.98).
>But the entrepreneurs in Veles are not about ideology or power games; their motivation is very American; it’s pure capitalism.
Thus it would be surprising if they weren’t also being subsidised by Russia,
It’s going to be known as the election that killed Thanksgiving.
Ah remember that year.. that was the thanksgiving where Jed grabbed Sue Ann’s pussy and Uncle Billy Jo shot grandpa.
sarahs mum said:
It’s going to be known as the election that killed Thanksgiving.Ah remember that year.. that was the thanksgiving where Jed grabbed Sue Ann’s pussy and Uncle Billy Jo shot grandpa.
Mr buffy and I are amused…
http://thefederalist.com/2016/11/14/election-marks-end-americas-racial-detente/
This Election Marks The End Of America’s Racial Détente
By David Marcus
November 14, 2016
““John McCain indulged racial fears, and Mitt Romney played on racial resentment, but they refused to go further. To borrow from George Wallace, they refused to cry ‘nigger.’ This is important. By rejecting the politics of explicit racism and white backlash, they moved the political battleground to nominally colorblind concerns. Race was still a part of these clashes—it’s unavoidable—but neither liberals nor conservatives would litigate the idea of a pluralistic, multiracial democracy. Looking back, I thought this meant we had a consensus. It appears, instead, that we had a detente. And Trump shattered it.” (note this paragraph is quoted from another article in the article I have linked to – not sure how to make a quote within a quote format on this forum).
“This admission that what he believed to be a consensus was really a détente is extremely important. While a consensus means questions have been laid to rest, a détente means disagreement still lingers, but a deal is struck to keep those disagreements from flowering into open hostility. From the 1970s through the beginning of the current century, America existed under such an agreement. Bouie is correct that this has been shattered, but he is wrong to suggest Trump is the only, or even the primary, reason for this.
“The rules of the deal were pretty straightforward. For whites, they stated that outright racist statements and explicit appeals to white racial identity were essentially banned. Along with this, whites accepted a double standard about the appropriateness of cultural and political tribalism. For obvious and reasonable historical and economic reasons, black and brown people explicitly pursuing their own interests was viewed differently than whites doing the same thing.
“The other side of the deal was that so long as white people were sufficiently punished for acts of outright racism, minority leaders and communities would be cautious with accusations of racism. The key here was that once leveled and proved, the accusation of racism was a blow most whites could not come back from. From Jimmy the Greek to Michael Richardson, being labeled a racist was a black mark that did not wash off easily.
“This was the basic agreement that set our cultural norms, a set of rules with relatively clear boundaries. Under those rules, many of Trump’s words and actions would have been immediately disqualifying, but they weren’t, because the rules are no longer in effect.
“The clearest example is the Judge Gonzalo Curiel drama. By the rules of the détente, saying a judge cannot fulfill his duties because of his race or nationality counted as a firing offense. Indeed leaders on both the Left and Right assumed Trump could not overcome it.
“But not only did many white voters break the rule of disqualifying a person based on a racist statement, they broke the second rule too. They began to ask why Trump couldn’t say a Mexican judge might be unfair, when we hear all the time about the danger of all white juries and white police officers. The white acceptance of legitimate racial double standards had dissipated, and without it the détente could not stand.
“There is a misconception that political correctness was responsible for the breakdown of the racial détente. This is incorrect. Political correctness, as loose a term as it is, was the means by which we continually renegotiated the terms of the deal. After all, the primary rules for whites had exactly to do with what was acceptable to say.
“Privilege theory and the concept of systemic racism dealt the death blow to the détente. In embracing these theories, minorities and progressives broke their essential rule, which was to not run around calling everyone a racist. As these theories took hold, every white person became a racist who must confess that racism and actively make amends. Yet if the white woman who teaches gender studies at Barnard with the Ben Shahn drawings in her office is a racist, what chance do the rest of have?
“Within the past few years, as privilege theory took hold, many whites began to think that no matter what they did they would be called racist, because, in fact, that was happening. Previously there were rules. They shifted at times, but if adhered to they largely protected one from the charge of racism. It’s like the Morrissey lyric: “is evil just something you are, or something you do.” Under the détente, racism was something you did; under privilege theory it is something you are.
“That shift, from carefully directed accusations of racism for direct actions to more general charges of unconscious racism, took away the carrot for whites. Worse, it led to a defensiveness and feeling of victimization that make today’s whites in many ways much more tribal than they were 30 years ago. White people are constantly told to examine their whiteness, not to think of themselves as racially neutral. That they did, but the result was not introspection that led to reconciliation, it was a decision that white people have just as much right to think of themselves as a special interest group as anyone else.
“The unfortunate place where we now find ourselves is one in which blatant attacks on white people, often from white people, are driving them further into a tribal cocoon. Samantha Bee’s awful and irresponsible berating of white women as the evil force behind Trump’s victory, while condescendingly describing magical people of color as the only ones who can save us, is a clear example of where white defensiveness and victimization are coming from.
“Furthermore, the ever-present drumbeat from the Left that every conservative victory is the death throes of bad, old white people who are about to be swept away by waves of brown immigration is making many whites dig in. On a certain level, how can you blame them? They are explicitly being told that their values and way of life are under the sword. How do we expect them to react?”
Trump shattered the detente alright, the turd.
How about that last minute FBI investigation, eh.
CrazyNeutrino said:
How about that last minute FBI investigation, eh.
not quite as much fun as children overboard.
esselte said:
http://thefederalist.com/2016/11/14/election-marks-end-americas-racial-detente/
The gymnastics people are doing to blame Trump on the left are fucking spectacular.
Business genius Donald Trump does not know what a blund trust is
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/why-trumps-confusion-about-what-blind-trust-matters
dv said:
Business genius Donald Trump does not know what a blund trust is
http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/why-trumps-confusion-about-what-blind-trust-matters
I don’t either but I’m guessing it’s like electing someone and hoping it’ll be alright on the night.
FWIW …
The checkers and correctors found only one probable falsehood in Trump’s first interview since the election, on CBS, which is his claim that 2 to 3 million illegal aliens have criminal records.
A 2013 report indicated there were 1.9 million non-US citizens in the USA who could be deported on grounds of a conviction. It is not unreasonable to say that this number could be between 2 and 3 million by now.
However, this set of non-US citizens in the USA is mostly people who are in the USA legally. The number of illegal aliens with criminal convictions is likely, say the boffinators, to be under a million.
—-
However, note that this was a remarkably honest interview. The fact that this was the only falsehood anyone could flag in a long interview could hint that he is going to … normalise?
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/dan-rather-now-more-than-ever-we-must-stand-up-for-science/?WT.mc_id=SA_TW_POLE_BLOG
Dan Rather: Now, More Than Ever, We Must Stand Up for Science
The Trump administration is outlining policies that put our response to climate change in deep jeopardy and threaten to change the fundamental direction of science in the U.S
When historians look back at the presidential election of 2016 they will certainly have many questions, but perhaps the biggest one isn’t getting enough attention today. “What the (insert the popular profanity of the future)?” they will likely ask. “Why was there hardly any mention of climate change?” Or will the future inhabitants of Earth be so distracted by survival that they won’t even care what happened in 2016 when the greatest country on the planet at that time denied this problem existed?
With just a few mentions in speeches—and, jaw-droppingly, no questions at the presidential debates—this omission marks a singular failure of the press and the political class. But it is indicative of a much broader systemic rot. Make no mistake; science was on the ballot this fall. And almost nobody took notice. But they should now because the Trump Administration is outlining an aggressive policy portfolio that not only puts our global response to climate change in deep jeopardy but that also threatens to radically change the fundamental direction of science in the United States.
The political press treats science as a niche issue. But I would argue that it is central to America’s military and economic might, that it shapes the health and welfare of our citizenry, and that our governmental support of the pure pursuit of knowledge through basic research is one of the defining symbols of American excellence. Science bolsters our global stature by its institutionalized respect for the truth, its evidence-based decision-making, and its willingness to accept differing opinions when the facts dictate them.
This is why we need to radically rethink how the press, scientists and politicians place science in the national discourse. And we can’t afford to wait. The top priority must be for scientists to try to engage the incoming administration. While the early indications of how a President Trump may approach issues of science are concerning, we cannot afford not to try. I would suggest that a group of Nobel Prize winners, members of the National Academy of Sciences and other scientific leaders who may get his attention, offer to meet with the President-elect to lay out what they think the biggest issues are. Top of the list is to assert the special role of science in planning for our future, especially, of course, when it comes to climate change.
Polling suggests that the public is not as rigid on issues of science as our recent political divide might suggest. Historically a strong science policy has been a place of bipartisan cooperation. Perhaps, with a President who owes little political capital to a national party, we can embrace a form of decision-making that has traditionally been apolitical and begin to base more of our policies on science. Perhaps our new President can be persuaded to listen to topics on which he hasn’t thought deeply. Perhaps he can see this as a way to rebuild America’s agriculture, manufacturing, and technology sector for the benefit of all. Of course this outreach effort may go nowhere. But we would be foolhardy not to try. Now is not the time for the scientific community and the new political leadership to withdraw from each other. If they do, each of them, and the rest of the country as well, will be damaged.
But scientists need an ally in making their case, and that must come from an active and involved press. The press can build bridges between the scientific community, the public, and elected officials. It can raise awareness of important issues and put pressure on obfuscating politicians. This posture for the press has been its role throughout the history of our democracy, and it must extend to a robust coverage of science. If science fails to engage with the leadership and with the people, the press will share a large part of the responsibility.
I would suggest that contrary to the general view in newsrooms, science stories are often very popular and could be a way to expand audience and reach. The problem I have long worried about is that there are not nearly enough editors and reporters with scientific training reporting and writing the news in America. The importance of this training isn’t only a matter of getting the facts right about science, it’s about understanding the spirit and process of discovery, the culture of the research enterprise and the relevance of science to so many other stories. The newsrooms that do cover science often turn to medical doctors. There is nothing wrong with that, but looking at almost all of at least the life sciences through the lens of human health is too limiting. It makes science seem reductive and constrained, rather than focusing on the exciting, innovative, and widespread applications of scientific research in improving our everyday lives.
What we need is sustained and improved partnerships between the press and the scientific community. We need more cross-pollination and engagement. We need experimentation on form, tone, content, and distribution. We cannot allow science content to be relegated to echo chambers or elite distribution outlets. We need to try to find a way to take the message to where the people are, through digital promotion, distribution and social media engagement.
I firmly believe science to be of the utmost importance to the world that I want my children and grandchildren to inherit. I believe it is a way to connect different groups, nations, and generations. I believe that scientists have more power in the public marketplace of ideas than they may realize. I refuse to believe that the moral weight of fact-based research has no place in what can seem like a post-truth era. All it takes is a Zika virus or the discovery of a new cancer treatment and the world comes pounding on the doors of the academy demanding relief.
I do not have much training in science. When I learned biology in school, Watson and Crick still hadn’t discovered the structure of DNA. But as a journalist, I have realized that science is one of the biggest and most important stories of our age. Don’t get me wrong, there is some wonderful science journalism being done, especially in new forms emerging online and in such things as podcasts. But there needs to be much more of it and it must be more prominently distributed. At this point in my life, I am determined to make a contribution. I have teamed up with researchers and science-minded storytellers to try to shift this dynamic. I hope to have more news on that in the months ahead. But this is a cause that must be bigger than any one single effort. I am eager to lend my name and voice, as well as organizational support, reporting, production, promotion, and any other contribution I can make. But we will need as much help as possible.
In the end, science is about hope; it’s about expanding our horizons, and endeavoring to understand more. It is an instinct so deeply human, and an instinct we need now more than ever. An enterprise this core to our national future must enlist all who can help from the world of journalism and science. The public and the policymakers need to hear this message. Science creates self-evident truths that everyone can own. I believe the world is ready to listen if we can only find a better way to speak.
Also, I think that it is fair for Trump to say that he would have won under a popular vote system because he’d have campaigned in NY and California.
I mean I don’t know whether he would have, but he might have. This election was held under an electoral college system and he ran a campaign very specifically tailored to win under that system. There’s no good reason to think HC would have won if the election had been contested under a popular vote count.
Jury selection for Trump’s fraud trial starts next week. One imagines this could be a lengthy process
dv said:
Jury selection for Trump’s fraud trial starts next week. One imagines this could be a lengthy process
who needs reality TV?
dv said:
Jury selection for Trump’s fraud trial starts next week. One imagines this could be a lengthy process
should be ok… I mean all they need to do is find a dozen or so people that have no feelings either way about Trump
dv said:
Jury selection for Trump’s fraud trial starts next week. One imagines this could be a lengthy process
If he’s convicted will he have to resign as president?
Gloria Allred was saying this morning that anything Trump says in court could be used in an impeachment dealy, both this case and if The Women decide to press charges.
However, once he’s Prez and has the Republican Congress behind him, he would theoretically be able to change the law to say civil matters cannot be served against a sitting President (this is what did Bill Clinton; he was impeached for a civil matter).
bump
:)
sibeen said:
bump:)
Don’t you mean, trump?
FUCK OFF
sibeen said:
bump:)
My money’s on Hillary. Americans can be weird sometimes but there’s no way they’d be crazy enough to elect Trump.
Fred Wong, sorry.
party_pants said:
Fred Wong, sorry.
Seemed rather apt for this thread.
party_pants said:
Fred Wong, sorry.
You don’t need to apologise for telling Sibeen to fuck off. Should be more of it.
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
Jury selection for Trump’s fraud trial starts next week. One imagines this could be a lengthy process
should be ok… I mean all they need to do is find a dozen or so people that have no feelings either way about Trump
rofl
Looks like Christie, despite humiliating himself and setting fire to whatever skerrick of respect he still held by supporting Trump, is not going to get a cabinet position and indeed his whole team has been flushed.
Some attribute this to that time when, as US Attorney for New Jersey, Christie successfully prosecuted Charles Kushner for 18 felony counts including witness tampering, tax evasion and illegal campaign finance contributions. He spent a year in jail, was fined half a million dollars, and was barred from practicing law again.
Kushner’s brother in law (sister’s husband) cooperated with the investigation, and Kushner retaliated by hiring a prostitute to seduce his brother in law, video taped the liaison and sent the tape to his own sister.
Charles Kushner is Ivanka Trump’s father in law, and Jared Kushner has led the purge. Hence Trump and Kushner share grandchildren.
So, nice family all around.
Still, you’ve got to feel sorry for Christie, except not at all.
Note, this is not satire. He’s really referring to members of his cabinet as finalists.

dv said:
Note, this is not satire. He’s really referring to members of his cabinet as finalists.
The Clinton supporters are very poor losers.
PermeateFree said:
How very inappropriate. Perhaps he doesn’t grasp the gravity of his new role.
Perhaps, perhaps, he’s a difficult one to read.
dv said:
PermeateFree said:How very inappropriate. Perhaps he doesn’t grasp the gravity of his new role.
Perhaps, perhaps, he’s a difficult one to read.
It’ll be the first ‘reality’-TV Presidency.
dv said:
PermeateFree said:How very inappropriate. Perhaps he doesn’t grasp the gravity of his new role.
Perhaps, perhaps, he’s a difficult one to read.
Very interesting, but I did not write that post. Whoever did must be another Clintonite.
mcgoon said:
dv said:
PermeateFree said:How very inappropriate. Perhaps he doesn’t grasp the gravity of his new role.
Perhaps, perhaps, he’s a difficult one to read.
It’ll be the first ‘reality’-TV Presidency.
Maybe one member of cabinet will be voted off every week.
PermeateFree said:
Whoever did must be another Clintonite.
You’re a very strange environmentalist if you support climate change deniers like Trump.
Defence will stipulate that PermeateFree is strange

Witty Rejoinder said:
PermeateFree said:
Whoever did must be another Clintonite.
You’re a very strange environmentalist if you support climate change deniers like Trump.
I don’t support anyone. I am just sick of all these people who continually jump to conclusions, exaggerate and spread half-truths and downright lies. Clinton lost, get over it and see what Trump will do.
dv said:
Defence will stipulate that PermeateFree is strange
Defense will stipulate that dv is untrustworthy.
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/11/28/obama-reckons-with-a-trump-presidency
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/this-is-our-moment-trumps-win-emboldens-activist-behind-effort-to-make-rape-legal/
kii said:
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/this-is-our-moment-trumps-win-emboldens-activist-behind-effort-to-make-rape-legal/
Welcome to the new world of American greatness.
kii said:
Strangely, humour sums it up perfectly….
I’m glad they marked it parody.
Might have thought it was the real Crooked Hillary.
Trump just settled the “university” fraud lawsuits for 25 million dollars.
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/18/president-elect-donald-trump-nearing-settlement-in-trump-university-case-source.html
dv said:
Trump just settled the “university” fraud lawsuits for 25 million dollars.http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/18/president-elect-donald-trump-nearing-settlement-in-trump-university-case-source.html
Some justice. Not a lot..but some.
sarahs mum said:
dv said:
Trump just settled the “university” fraud lawsuits for 25 million dollars.http://www.cnbc.com/2016/11/18/president-elect-donald-trump-nearing-settlement-in-trump-university-case-source.html
Some justice. Not a lot..but some.
25 mill is small change for him.
http://www.aol.com/article/news/2016/11/18/steve-bannon-i-m-not-a-white-nationalist-i-m-an-economic-nati/21609630/?a_dgi=aolshare_facebook
sarahs mum said:
http://www.aol.com/article/news/2016/11/18/steve-bannon-i-m-not-a-white-nationalist-i-m-an-economic-nati/21609630/?a_dgi=aolshare_facebook
Does he explain why his news site is full of racist drivel? Is it economical racist drivel?
Mike Pence attends Hamilton, audience boos him, cast condemns him from the stage http://www.palmerreport.com/news/hamilton-mike-pence-boo/125/
sarahs mum said:
Mike Pence attends Hamilton, audience boos him, cast condemns him from the stage http://www.palmerreport.com/news/hamilton-mike-pence-boo/125/
Ha. You’d think a hard-core homophobe like Pence would realise he’d not be welcome in a theatre.
I’m about to make a tasty salad to accompany the chops and bangers which are waiting to be smoked. Think I’ll smoke them in ironbark today instead of apple.
Bubblecar said:
sarahs mum said:
Mike Pence attends Hamilton, audience boos him, cast condemns him from the stage http://www.palmerreport.com/news/hamilton-mike-pence-boo/125/
Ha. You’d think a hard-core homophobe like Pence would realise he’d not be welcome in a theatre.
I think those liberal elites should be reaching out to white working class battlers like Pence
Big call from the WSJ:
The Wall Street Journal, in an editorial on Friday, went so far as to urge the President-elect to sell off all his hotels, golf courses and other assets, and the take that cash and turn it over to a blind trust, as that would be the only way to avoid all possible conflicts.
http://www.theage.com.au/world/us-election/why-did-ivanka-trump-attend-her-fathers-meeting-with-japanese-pm-shinzo-abe-20161118-gssyde.html
One of the first things he’s going to do is evict a black family from their home.
It’s not right.
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first things he’s going to do is evict a black family from their home.
It’s not right.
It will be just like the old days for Trump
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/08/28/us/politics/donald-trump-housing-race.html
Witty Rejoinder said:
Big call from the WSJ:The Wall Street Journal, in an editorial on Friday, went so far as to urge the President-elect to sell off all his hotels, golf courses and other assets, and the take that cash and turn it over to a blind trust, as that would be the only way to avoid all possible conflicts.
http://www.theage.com.au/world/us-election/why-did-ivanka-trump-attend-her-fathers-meeting-with-japanese-pm-shinzo-abe-20161118-gssyde.html
This would not be a great time for him to sell his hotels…
Peak Warming Man said:
One of the first things he’s going to do is evict a black family from their home.
It’s not right.
I read that the family have ordered renovation to be done so Trump will be living across the way that his mate, Nixon, loved so much
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/19/hamilton-mike-pence-trump-voters-safe-space
Trump voters sure are sensitive lately. They’re upset that the cast of the hit play Hamilton made a statement to vice-president elect Mike Pence, and that the audience booed him. They’re displeased that their vote is costing them relationships with family and friends. And for some reason not entirely clear to me, they’re unhappy with Starbucks and decided to demonstrate as much by … buying lots of coffee at Starbucks.
The same people who wear shirts that read “fuck your feelings,” and rail against “political correctness” seem to believe that there should be no social consequences for their vote. I keep hearing calls for empathy and healing, civility and polite discourse. As if supporting a man who would fill his administration with white nationalists and misogynists is something to simply agree to disagree on.
Absolutely not. You don’t get to vote for a person who brags about sexual assault and expect that the women in your life will just shrug their shoulders. You don’t get to play the victim when people de-friend you on Facebook, as if being disliked for supporting a bigot is somehow worse than the suffering that marginalized people will endure under Trump. And you certainly do not get to enjoy a performance by people of color and those in the LGBT community without remark or protest when you enact policies and stoke hatred that put those very people’s lives in danger.
Being socially ostracized for supporting Trump is not an infringement of your rights, it’s a reasonable response by those of us who are disgusted, anxious, and afraid. I was recently accused by a writer of “vote shaming” – but there’s nothing wrong with being made to feel ashamed for doing something shameful.
—-
dv said:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/nov/19/hamilton-mike-pence-trump-voters-safe-spaceTrump voters sure are sensitive lately. They’re upset that the cast of the hit play Hamilton made a statement to vice-president elect Mike Pence, and that the audience booed him. They’re displeased that their vote is costing them relationships with family and friends. And for some reason not entirely clear to me, they’re unhappy with Starbucks and decided to demonstrate as much by … buying lots of coffee at Starbucks.
The same people who wear shirts that read “fuck your feelings,” and rail against “political correctness” seem to believe that there should be no social consequences for their vote. I keep hearing calls for empathy and healing, civility and polite discourse. As if supporting a man who would fill his administration with white nationalists and misogynists is something to simply agree to disagree on.
Absolutely not. You don’t get to vote for a person who brags about sexual assault and expect that the women in your life will just shrug their shoulders. You don’t get to play the victim when people de-friend you on Facebook, as if being disliked for supporting a bigot is somehow worse than the suffering that marginalized people will endure under Trump. And you certainly do not get to enjoy a performance by people of color and those in the LGBT community without remark or protest when you enact policies and stoke hatred that put those very people’s lives in danger.
Being socially ostracized for supporting Trump is not an infringement of your rights, it’s a reasonable response by those of us who are disgusted, anxious, and afraid. I was recently accused by a writer of “vote shaming” – but there’s nothing wrong with being made to feel ashamed for doing something shameful.
—-
Shame your opinion came second.
PermeateFree said:
Shame your opinion came second.
Yeah fuck all the elites. Especially DV.
Witty Rejoinder said:
PermeateFree said:Shame your opinion came second.
Yeah fuck all the elites. Especially DV.
Yeah, they’re not as smart as they think they are.
PermeateFree said:
Yeah, they’re not as smart as they think they are.
That’s rich coming from one of the most arrogant pricks around.
Witty Rejoinder said:
PermeateFree said:Yeah, they’re not as smart as they think they are.
That’s rich coming from one of the most arrogant pricks around.
You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how stupid it may be. By the way, is there a connection between arrogant prick and not being as smart as they think?
PermeateFree said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
PermeateFree said:Yeah, they’re not as smart as they think they are.
That’s rich coming from one of the most arrogant pricks around.
You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how stupid it may be. By the way, is there a connection between arrogant prick and not being as smart as they think?
Another thing too complex for you to understand.
Witty Rejoinder said:
PermeateFree said:
Witty Rejoinder said:That’s rich coming from one of the most arrogant pricks around.
You are entitled to your opinion, no matter how stupid it may be. By the way, is there a connection between arrogant prick and not being as smart as they think?
Another thing too complex for you to understand.
No just trying to understand your logic.
The elites won this election. They will be getting trillions of dollars in tax breaks. Plus DJT vows to ger rid of the Dodd-Frank banking regulations, and ease up industrial emissions regulations.
The people who lost are those on minimum wage, those who can’t afford to send their kids to college, and people who have preexisting medical conditions who rely on Obamacare to pay for their treatments.
dv said:
The elites won this election. They will be getting trillions of dollars in tax breaks. Plus DJT vows to ger rid of the Dodd-Frank banking regulations, and ease up industrial emissions regulations.The people who lost are those on minimum wage, those who can’t afford to send their kids to college, and people who have preexisting medical conditions who rely on Obamacare to pay for their treatments.
As a winner, you certainly cry a lot.
What exactly is it about Trump that you admire, Permeate?
Bubblecar said:
What exactly is it about Trump that you admire, Permeate?
Had you critics read my posts, you would have understood that I neither support Clinton or Trump. I just get jacked off by all the vilification by people who make a habit of this activity.
PermeateFree said:
Bubblecar said:
What exactly is it about Trump that you admire, Permeate?
Had you critics read my posts, you would have understood that I neither support Clinton or Trump. I just get jacked off by all the vilification by people who make a habit of this activity.
Well boo-hoo for you.
Bubblecar said:
PermeateFree said:
Bubblecar said:
What exactly is it about Trump that you admire, Permeate?
Had you critics read my posts, you would have understood that I neither support Clinton or Trump. I just get jacked off by all the vilification by people who make a habit of this activity.
Well boo-hoo for you.
I expected no better from you car.
Stop squabbling.
Bubblecar said:
PermeateFree said:
Bubblecar said:
What exactly is it about Trump that you admire, Permeate?
Had you critics read my posts, you would have understood that I neither support Clinton or Trump. I just get jacked off by all the vilification by people who make a habit of this activity.
Well boo-hoo for you.
Permeatefree needs a safe space
FTL
The Lab said:
Stop squabbling.
lol
Voter registration
Oregon lets it ride
The Beaver State bucks a trend
Nov 19th 2016 | LOS ANGELES | From the print edition
NOT since 2000 has a lower share of the American electorate turned out to vote in a presidential election. That may be because of voters’ lack of enthusiasm for either candidate. But many suspect restrictive laws also played a part. Since 2012 several states have passed laws requiring prospective voters to show state-issued identification at the polls—documents which poorer and minority voters, who mostly lean Democratic, are less likely to possess.
Oregon bucks this trend. This year’s election was the first since its legislature passed the Oregon Motor Voter Act in March 2015. Federal law already allows citizens to register to vote at their local motor-vehicle department. Oregon’s law makes this process automatic: whenever eligible citizens apply for, renew, or replace an Oregon driving licence, permit or ID card, they are registered to vote. Those who do not choose a particular party are considered unaffiliated; Oregonians who do not wish to be registered at all are given 21 days to opt out of the programme.
Read more:
http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21710269-beaver-state-bucks-trend-oregon-lets-it-ride
dv said:
Bubblecar said:
PermeateFree said:Had you critics read my posts, you would have understood that I neither support Clinton or Trump. I just get jacked off by all the vilification by people who make a habit of this activity.
Well boo-hoo for you.
Permeatefree needs a safe space
Probably from you. Dv, I don’t like you and think you are a slimy individual with a very large ego. Please direct your little dick in another direction or I’ll take it off.
PermeateFree said:
dv said:
Bubblecar said:Well boo-hoo for you.
Permeatefree needs a safe space
Probably from you. Dv, I don’t like you and think you are a slimy individual with a very large ego. Please direct your little dick in another direction or I’ll take it off.
lol.
PermeateFree said:
dv said:
Bubblecar said:Well boo-hoo for you.
Permeatefree needs a safe space
Probably from you. Dv, I don’t like you and think you are a slimy individual with a very large ego. Please direct your little dick in another direction or I’ll take it off.
is that like how boys hit girls when then like them.. you know not like as in buddy-buddy friends, but “like”
PermeateFree said:
dv said:
Bubblecar said:Well boo-hoo for you.
Permeatefree needs a safe space
Probably from you. Dv, I don’t like you and think you are a slimy individual with a very large ego. Please direct your little dick in another direction or I’ll take it off.
This is all good stuff, PF. You should write it down for when you run for president, or have someone do it for you. I can see now why you feel such affinity for Trump.
Joshua 6:5 When you hear them sound a long blast on the Trump/Pence, have the whole army give a loud shout; then the wall of the city will collapse and the army will go up, everyone straight in.
dv said:
PermeateFree said:
dv said:Permeatefree needs a safe space
Probably from you. Dv, I don’t like you and think you are a slimy individual with a very large ego. Please direct your little dick in another direction or I’ll take it off.
This is all good stuff, PF. You should write it down for when you run for president, or have someone do it for you. I can see now why you feel such affinity for Trump.
If anyone can vilify someone dv it is you. You have such a closed mind for anything outside your square.
https://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/polling-firm-ceo-20-million-trump-voters-will-lose-time-and-half-overtime-pay-under-gop-plan/a
Polling firm CEO: ’20 million Trump voters’ will lose time and half overtime pay under GOP plan Millions of Americans who voted for Donald Trump are expected to lose overtime pay rights soon after he is sworn in as president. … Tom Bonier, CEO of the polling firm Targetsmart, pointed out on Monday that “almost 20,000,000 Trump voters would lose time and a half overtime” under a Republican plan to reverse regulations put in place by President Barack Obama. … . An overtime rule requiring companies to pay time-and-a-half to workers who make less than $47,000 a year is expected to be one of the first reversals. …Exit polls taken during the Nov. 8 election showed that 41 percent of Trump’s 61 million votes were cast by people who make less than $50,000 a year.
Sticking it to the elites
Let me try that again
https://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/polling-firm-ceo-20-million-trump-voters-will-lose-time-and-half-overtime-pay-under-gop-plan/
Polling firm CEO: ’20 million Trump voters’ will lose time and half overtime pay under GOP planMillions of Americans who voted for Donald Trump are expected to lose overtime pay rights soon after he is sworn in as president.
…
Tom Bonier, CEO of the polling firm Targetsmart, pointed out on Monday that “almost 20,000,000 Trump voters would lose time and a half overtime” under a Republican plan to reverse regulations put in place by President Barack Obama.
…
. An overtime rule requiring companies to pay time-and-a-half to workers who make less than $47,000 a year is expected to be one of the first reversals.…
Exit polls taken during the Nov. 8 election showed that 41 percent of Trump’s 61 million votes were cast by people who make less than $50,000 a year.
Sticking it to the elites
dv said:
Let me try that againhttps://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/polling-firm-ceo-20-million-trump-voters-will-lose-time-and-half-overtime-pay-under-gop-plan/
Polling firm CEO: ’20 million Trump voters’ will lose time and half overtime pay under GOP planMillions of Americans who voted for Donald Trump are expected to lose overtime pay rights soon after he is sworn in as president.
…
Tom Bonier, CEO of the polling firm Targetsmart, pointed out on Monday that “almost 20,000,000 Trump voters would lose time and a half overtime” under a Republican plan to reverse regulations put in place by President Barack Obama.
…
. An overtime rule requiring companies to pay time-and-a-half to workers who make less than $47,000 a year is expected to be one of the first reversals.…
Exit polls taken during the Nov. 8 election showed that 41 percent of Trump’s 61 million votes were cast by people who make less than $50,000 a year.
Sticking it to the elites
Fake news, they wont lose anything because Obamas plan has not been implemented yet.
Gosh the US have some strange laws.
dv said:
https://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/polling-firm-ceo-20-million-trump-voters-will-lose-time-and-half-overtime-pay-under-gop-plan/aPolling firm CEO: ’20 million Trump voters’ will lose time and half overtime pay under GOP plan Millions of Americans who voted for Donald Trump are expected to lose overtime pay rights soon after he is sworn in as president. … Tom Bonier, CEO of the polling firm Targetsmart, pointed out on Monday that “almost 20,000,000 Trump voters would lose time and a half overtime” under a Republican plan to reverse regulations put in place by President Barack Obama. … . An overtime rule requiring companies to pay time-and-a-half to workers who make less than $47,000 a year is expected to be one of the first reversals. …Perfect.Exit polls taken during the Nov. 8 election showed that 41 percent of Trump’s 61 million votes were cast by people who make less than $50,000 a year.
Sticking it to the elites
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Let me try that againhttps://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/polling-firm-ceo-20-million-trump-voters-will-lose-time-and-half-overtime-pay-under-gop-plan/
Polling firm CEO: ’20 million Trump voters’ will lose time and half overtime pay under GOP planMillions of Americans who voted for Donald Trump are expected to lose overtime pay rights soon after he is sworn in as president.
…
Tom Bonier, CEO of the polling firm Targetsmart, pointed out on Monday that “almost 20,000,000 Trump voters would lose time and a half overtime” under a Republican plan to reverse regulations put in place by President Barack Obama.
…
. An overtime rule requiring companies to pay time-and-a-half to workers who make less than $47,000 a year is expected to be one of the first reversals.…
Exit polls taken during the Nov. 8 election showed that 41 percent of Trump’s 61 million votes were cast by people who make less than $50,000 a year.
Sticking it to the elites
Fake news, they wont lose anything because Obamas plan has not been implemented yet.
So if a bank employee diverted some money that should have been paid into your account, that wouldn’t be stealing because you hadn’t actually received it yet.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Protecting President-elect Donald Trump and his family is costing New York City more than $1 million a day, according to three city officials.
Guess How Much it Cost Taxpayers to Protect the First Family
the cost to taxpayers associated with running the White House under President Obama was approximately $1.4 billion per year.
more…
so it will cost about the same
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Protecting President-elect Donald Trump and his family is costing New York City more than $1 million a day, according to three city officials.Guess How Much it Cost Taxpayers to Protect the First Family
the cost to taxpayers associated with running the White House under President Obama was approximately $1.4 billion per year.
more…
so it will cost about the same
How does that compare with Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Protecting President-elect Donald Trump and his family is costing New York City more than $1 million a day, according to three city officials.Guess How Much it Cost Taxpayers to Protect the First Family
the cost to taxpayers associated with running the White House under President Obama was approximately $1.4 billion per year.
more…
so it will cost about the same
I wonder how much luxury they get
Cymek said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Protecting President-elect Donald Trump and his family is costing New York City more than $1 million a day, according to three city officials.Guess How Much it Cost Taxpayers to Protect the First Family
the cost to taxpayers associated with running the White House under President Obama was approximately $1.4 billion per year.
more…
so it will cost about the same
I wonder how much luxury they get
Good question
I wonder what the luxury cost is?
Obama Reckons with a Trump Presidency
is there a shorter version?
High-educated but medium-income counties went for Clinton.
Low-educated but high-income counties went for Trump.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/education-not-income-predicted-who-would-vote-for-trump/
Education, Not Income, Predicted Who Would Vote For Trump
Sometimes statistical analysis is tricky, and sometimes a finding just jumps off the page. Here’s one example of the latter.
dv said:
High-educated but medium-income counties went for Clinton.Low-educated but high-income counties went for Trump.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/education-not-income-predicted-who-would-vote-for-trump/
Education, Not Income, Predicted Who Would Vote For Trump
Sometimes statistical analysis is tricky, and sometimes a finding just jumps off the page. Here’s one example of the latter.
OTOH, 79% of Manhattan voted for Clinton.
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.
But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
Started with Clive of India
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
Started with Clive of India
Tamb said:
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
Started with Clive of India
Isn’t he the bloke who makes the curry powder?![]()
the same
Tamb said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
What is Trump’s stance on chemtrails?
Plot by the Mexicans to sneak over the border whilst everyone is looking up
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
Meh, I said here on the forum that people were going to vote differently than what they said. Brexit was the lesson. Why tell a pollster who you are going to vote for when all you get is sneers and being called an idiot.
AwesomeO said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
Meh, I said here on the forum that people were going to vote differently than what they said. Brexit was the lesson. Why tell a pollster who you are going to vote for when all you get is sneers and being called an idiot.
I blame reality tv it’s so oversaturated that it resulted in a contestant becoming president
Cymek said:
AwesomeO said:
Peak Warming Man said:There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
Meh, I said here on the forum that people were going to vote differently than what they said. Brexit was the lesson. Why tell a pollster who you are going to vote for when all you get is sneers and being called an idiot.
I blame reality tv it’s so oversaturated that it resulted in a contestant becoming president
AwesomeO said:
Meh, I said here on the forum that people were going to vote differently than what they said. Brexit was the lesson. Why tell a pollster who you are going to vote for when all you get is sneers and being called an idiot.
I don’t think pollsters are encouraged to call their respondents idiots.
Bubblecar said:
AwesomeO said:
Meh, I said here on the forum that people were going to vote differently than what they said. Brexit was the lesson. Why tell a pollster who you are going to vote for when all you get is sneers and being called an idiot.
I don’t think pollsters are encouraged to call their respondents idiots.
Not to be taken literally, if you read a newspaper or watched the news or followed any celebrity Twitter you knew that admitting that voting for trump or Brexit was going to label you a deplorable and beyond the pale.
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
I don’t see that statement as being wise after the event, but it doesn’t seem to be reflect what really happened either.
Overall, the polls were pretty well spot on. The predictors just failed to take due account of regional voting patterns.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
I don’t see that statement as being wise after the event, but it doesn’t seem to be reflect what really happened either.
Overall, the polls were pretty well spot on. The predictors just failed to take due account of regional voting patterns.
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
Clive Palmer
doesn’t read email
lost the phone
no diary
shadow director tricks
tricks such as losing information
treating other people like shit
100 cars
spending other peoples money
Queensland Nickel
Reckless behavior
Bully
scumbag…..
etc
Not to be taken literally, if you read a newspaper or watched the news or followed any Republican Twitter you knew that admitting that voting for Clinton or Bremain was going to label you a naïve lefty, duped by the crooked leaders of the establishment, and beyond the pale.
Bubblecar said:
AwesomeO said:
Meh, I said here on the forum that people were going to vote differently than what they said. Brexit was the lesson. Why tell a pollster who you are going to vote for when all you get is sneers and being called an idiot.
I don’t think pollsters are encouraged to call their respondents idiots.
FWIW, I don’t think that had anything to do with it. Trump was overtly racist and sexist, made fun of the disabled and war heroes, and people would have been ashamed to say they were voting for him regardless of what any leftist or commentator said.
More surprising that 97% were willing to say so, really.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
I don’t see that statement as being wise after the event, but it doesn’t seem to be reflect what really happened either.
Overall, the polls were pretty well spot on. The predictors just failed to take due account of regional voting patterns.
if the polls were testing the polular vote, then sure I agree… however, if the polls wanted to predict the outcome of the Electoral College, then it should have taken into account regional variances, especially in key states…
The Rev Dodgson said:
Not to be taken literally, if you read a newspaper or watched the news or followed any Republican Twitter you knew that admitting that voting for Clinton or Bremain was going to label you a naïve lefty, duped by the crooked leaders of the establishment, and beyond the pale.
I’m not sure that’s entirely true… both government and business crave stability and that’s exactly what Bremain and Hills offered…
Tamb said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
What is Trump’s stance on chemtrails?
Autism I think
diddly-squat said:
if the polls were testing the polular vote, then sure I agree… however, if the polls wanted to predict the outcome of the Electoral College, then it should have taken into account regional variances, especially in key states…
Why say “however” when you are repeating what I just said?
diddly-squat said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Not to be taken literally, if you read a newspaper or watched the news or followed any Republican Twitter you knew that admitting that voting for Clinton or Bremain was going to label you a naïve lefty, duped by the crooked leaders of the establishment, and beyond the pale.
I’m not sure that’s entirely true… both government and business crave stability and that’s exactly what Bremain and Hills offered…
The point is that the statement I adapted was nowhere near true either.

The Rev Dodgson said:
Not to be taken literally, if you read a newspaper or watched the news or followed any Republican Twitter you knew that admitting that voting for Clinton or Bremain was going to label you a naïve lefty, duped by the crooked leaders of the establishment, and beyond the pale.
You must read a different set of newspapers and watch a different news to me then. Columnists journalists, the mainstream were unanimous in declaring that someone as baggaged and deplorable as Trump had no hope of becoming president. I can only recall two who predicted correctly he would become President.
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:
if the polls were testing the polular vote, then sure I agree… however, if the polls wanted to predict the outcome of the Electoral College, then it should have taken into account regional variances, especially in key states…Why say “however” when you are repeating what I just said?
my point is that I think the actual idea of the polls is to determine the winner of the Electoral College.. so they were’t spot on at all…
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Ian said:
We knew that American society was deeply divided, and that positions were fixed. Yet the day after the election every right-wing commentator in the land began braying about how America had shifted, of how “the American people” had spoken and they wanted Trump. Trump won, they announced, because the “sneering elites” are completely cut-off from the concerns of everyday Americans.But nothing happened in American society between the day before and the day after the election. The unexpectedness of Trump’s victory was due to one phenomenon alone: around 3 per cent of voters who favoured Trump were unwilling to reveal their intentions to the pollsters. That’s all.
Clive Hamilton
https://theconversation.com/trumpism-as-whitelash-69116
There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
Started with Clive of India
Clive of Fairfax missed that gene.
Cymek said:
AwesomeO said:
Peak Warming Man said:There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
Meh, I said here on the forum that people were going to vote differently than what they said. Brexit was the lesson. Why tell a pollster who you are going to vote for when all you get is sneers and being called an idiot.
I blame reality tv it’s so oversaturated that it resulted in a contestant becoming president
Isn’t it great how American Reality TV works, Rubbish in, Rubbish out, Rubbish for President
no one bothers to clean up the rubbish anymore
no one
CrazyNeutrino said:
Tamb said:
Peak Warming Man said:There’s a lot of Clives out there, all wise and knowing after the event, nay even more so.
What is Trump’s stance on chemtrails?Autism I think
diddly-squat said:
I’m not sure that’s entirely true… both government and business crave stability and that’s exactly what Bremain and Hills offered…
Unfortunately some businesses – such as those run by Murdoch and Dacre etc – heavily backed Brexit, despite the opposition of most of the business world.
And a lot of easily-manipulated idiots read the Sun and Daily Mail.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Cymek said:
AwesomeO said:Meh, I said here on the forum that people were going to vote differently than what they said. Brexit was the lesson. Why tell a pollster who you are going to vote for when all you get is sneers and being called an idiot.
I blame reality tv it’s so oversaturated that it resulted in a contestant becoming president
Isn’t it great how American Reality TV works, Rubbish in, Rubbish out, Rubbish for President
no one bothers to clean up the rubbish anymore
no one
I’m not sure I really understand the hate for American TV, or more so, American reality TV…
Just like most things, it’s a quality continuum from complete rubbish to really entertaining…
furious said:
- What is Trump’s stance on chemtrails?
9/11 was not due to chemtrail stuff. It was due to a lack of DHMO.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Overall, the polls were pretty well spot on. The predictors just failed to take due account of regional voting patterns.
Mmm. FiveThirtyEight’s prediction was a 3.5% popular vote win by HDRC, they gave Trump a 28% chance of winning: specifically they assigned a 10% chance to the outcome that Hillary won the popular vote and Trump won the election.
Votes are still being counted but if things continue linearly it looks as though Clinton will win the popular vote by 1.9%. A 1.6% polling miss is pretty ordinary.
But yeah, it was the state polls near the great lakes that were shockers. The big shock was Wisconsin. That was about a 7% polling miss. I’ll hand it to Trump that he knew where to be campaigning, he was all up in Wisconsin and Michigan in the weeks before the election, canny, canny. Clinton did not set foot in Wisconsin after winning the primary, and only once visited Michigan.
Tamb said:
furious said:
- What is Trump’s stance on chemtrails?
9/11 was not due to chemtrail stuff. It was due to a lack of DHMO.
I thought it was nanotermites or something?
Bubblecar said:
diddly-squat said:
I’m not sure that’s entirely true… both government and business crave stability and that’s exactly what Bremain and Hills offered…
Unfortunately some businesses – such as those run by Murdoch and Dacre etc – heavily backed Brexit, despite the opposition of most of the business world.
And a lot of easily-manipulated idiots read the Sun and Daily Mail.
if only there were more sensible voting Britons then this would never have happened…
diddly-squat said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Cymek said:I blame reality tv it’s so oversaturated that it resulted in a contestant becoming president
Isn’t it great how American Reality TV works, Rubbish in, Rubbish out, Rubbish for President
no one bothers to clean up the rubbish anymore
no one
I’m not sure I really understand the hate for American TV, or more so, American reality TV…
Just like most things, it’s a quality continuum from complete rubbish to really entertaining…
diddly-squat said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Cymek said:I blame reality tv it’s so oversaturated that it resulted in a contestant becoming president
Isn’t it great how American Reality TV works, Rubbish in, Rubbish out, Rubbish for President
no one bothers to clean up the rubbish anymore
no one
I’m not sure I really understand the hate for American TV, or more so, American reality TV…
Just like most things, it’s a quality continuum from complete rubbish to really entertaining…
I don’t hate American tv, lots of really good shows, but reality tv seems to be as scripted as other shows with what appears to be really obnoxious people. Maybe its me as I find loud show off people as annoying as hell
diddly-squat said:
if only there were more sensible voting Britons then this would never have happened…
Well obviously.
poikilotherm said:
Tamb said:
furious said:
- What is Trump’s stance on chemtrails?
9/11 was not due to chemtrail stuff. It was due to a lack of DHMO.
I thought it was nanotermites or something?
diddly-squat said:
Bubblecar said:
diddly-squat said:
I’m not sure that’s entirely true… both government and business crave stability and that’s exactly what Bremain and Hills offered…
Unfortunately some businesses – such as those run by Murdoch and Dacre etc – heavily backed Brexit, despite the opposition of most of the business world.
And a lot of easily-manipulated idiots read the Sun and Daily Mail.
if only there were more sensible voting Britons then this would never have happened…
Bubblecar said:
diddly-squat said:
if only there were more sensible voting Britons then this would never have happened…
Well obviously.
you do understand I’m talking about you, right…
diddly-squat said:
Bubblecar said:
diddly-squat said:
if only there were more sensible voting Britons then this would never have happened…
Well obviously.
you do understand I’m talking about you, right…
You wish he was more sensible? :-P
AwesomeO said:
Columnists journalists, the mainstream were unanimous in declaring that someone as baggaged and deplorable as Trump had no hope of becoming president. I can only recall two who predicted correctly he would become President.
Among those who predicted the Trump win was Michael Moore, and basically picked exactly how and where Trump would win it. Not a fan of MM but I must admit he picked that like a nose.
I rate the chance of winning percentage paradigm as the stupidest way to predict an election.
As a matter of fact it predicts SWA.
I’ll have more to say about this at a later time.
dv said:
diddly-squat said:
Bubblecar said:Well obviously.
you do understand I’m talking about you, right…
You wish he was more sensible? :-P
nice work comma Nazi
Peak Warming Man said:
I rate the chance of winning percentage paradigm as the stupidest way to predict an election.
As a matter of fact it predicts SWA.
I’ll have more to say about this at a later time.
Oh I bet I can think up stupider ways
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
I rate the chance of winning percentage paradigm as the stupidest way to predict an election.
As a matter of fact it predicts SWA.
I’ll have more to say about this at a later time.Oh I bet I can think up stupider ways
Go on then
diddly-squat said:
Bubblecar said:
diddly-squat said:
if only there were more sensible voting Britons then this would never have happened…
Well obviously.
you do understand I’m talking about you, right…
I wasn’t eligible to vote:
Who can vote in the referendum?
British, Irish and Commonwealth citizens aged 18 or over who are resident in the UK or Gibraltar will be eligible to vote. UK citizens resident overseas will also be eligible to vote, provided they have been registered to vote at a UK address in the last 15 years.
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
diddly-squat said:you do understand I’m talking about you, right…
You wish he was more sensible? :-P
nice work comma Nazi
dv said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Overall, the polls were pretty well spot on. The predictors just failed to take due account of regional voting patterns.
Mmm. FiveThirtyEight’s prediction was a 3.5% popular vote win by HDRC, they gave Trump a 28% chance of winning: specifically they assigned a 10% chance to the outcome that Hillary won the popular vote and Trump won the election.
Votes are still being counted but if things continue linearly it looks as though Clinton will win the popular vote by 1.9%. A 1.6% polling miss is pretty ordinary.
But yeah, it was the state polls near the great lakes that were shockers. The big shock was Wisconsin. That was about a 7% polling miss. I’ll hand it to Trump that he knew where to be campaigning, he was all up in Wisconsin and Michigan in the weeks before the election, canny, canny. Clinton did not set foot in Wisconsin after winning the primary, and only once visited Michigan.
So the “pretty well spot on” is based on my assessment of all the polls over the last few days, aided with a good bit of hind-sight and cherry picking, but I’ll settle for “the polls were not all that far out”.
For all the talk of what a dumb-arse Trump is, he does seem to be pretty good at getting the people who matter to do what he wants.
dv said:
AwesomeO said:Columnists journalists, the mainstream were unanimous in declaring that someone as baggaged and deplorable as Trump had no hope of becoming president. I can only recall two who predicted correctly he would become President.
Among those who predicted the Trump win was Michael Moore, and basically picked exactly how and where Trump would win it. Not a fan of MM but I must admit he picked that like a nose.
He was one, the other one was a guy whose name I can’t recall but has a history of predicting it correctly and he does it by analysing the colleges.
The thing is the courts have deemed the brexit vote to be a non binding referendum and that the parliament needs to vote on it before the government can invoke clause 50 and brexit.
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
I rate the chance of winning percentage paradigm as the stupidest way to predict an election.
As a matter of fact it predicts SWA.
I’ll have more to say about this at a later time.Oh I bet I can think up stupider ways
Go on then
I predict the taller candidate will win the presidential election.
Peak Warming Man said:
The thing is the courts have deemed the brexit vote to be a non binding referendum and that the parliament needs to vote on it before the government can invoke clause 50 and brexit.
They should vote to be a bit Brexited on one side in the middle of the week.
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:Oh I bet I can think up stupider ways
Go on then
I predict the taller candidate will win the presidential election.
OK I’ll give you that one but that’s about it.
Rescue 500 Facebook page said a patient had been thrown from a horse. He was treated and stabilised.
must resist commenting
Oops
Peak Warming Man said:
The thing is the courts have deemed the brexit vote to be a non binding referendum and that the parliament needs to vote on it before the government can invoke clause 50 and brexit.
Yes … they might drag this out until everyone is dead
The Rev Dodgson said:
Peak Warming Man said:
The thing is the courts have deemed the brexit vote to be a non binding referendum and that the parliament needs to vote on it before the government can invoke clause 50 and brexit.
They should vote to be a bit Brexited on one side in the middle of the week.
Nothing like a bit of Brexit Bickering
This is a little out of date, but…

It was like they were running two separate elections for the same job.
They should have only one. Americans are really strange people
DV was FDR the first candidate who ever attempted a third term?
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:Go on then
I predict the taller candidate will win the presidential election.
OK I’ll give you that one but that’s about it.
Well hey that one would have been correct!
Actually let me check that historically
Trump Clinton yes
Obama Romney no
Obama McCain yes
Bush Kerry no
Bush Gore no
Clinton Dole yes
Clinton Bush tie
Bush Dukakis yes
Reagan Mondale yes
Reagan Carter yes
Carter Ford no
Nixon McGovern no
Nixon Humphrey yes
Johnson Goldwater yes
Kennedy Nixon yes
Eisenhower Stevenson yes
Eisenhower Stevenson yes
Truman Dewey yes
So 5 times since WW2, the shorter candidate won. 12 times, the taller candidate won. 1 time the candidates were the same height.
dv said:
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:I predict the taller candidate will win the presidential election.
OK I’ll give you that one but that’s about it.
Well hey that one would have been correct!
Actually let me check that historically
Trump Clinton yes
Obama Romney no
Obama McCain yes
Bush Kerry no
Bush Gore no
Clinton Dole yes
Clinton Bush tie
Bush Dukakis yes
Reagan Mondale yes
Reagan Carter yes
Carter Ford no
Nixon McGovern no
Nixon Humphrey yes
Johnson Goldwater yes
Kennedy Nixon yes
Eisenhower Stevenson yes
Eisenhower Stevenson yes
Truman Dewey yesSo 5 times since WW2, the shorter candidate won. 12 times, the taller candidate won. 1 time the candidates were the same height.
What about colors of ties?
Witty Rejoinder said:
DV was FDR the first candidate who ever attempted a third term?
Teddy Roosevelt sought a third term.
Here is a Trump backflip
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-23/trump-softens-on-clinton-investigation,-climate-change/8048872
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
DV was FDR the first candidate who ever attempted a third term?
Teddy Roosevelt sought a third term.
Bill Clinton sought an in term
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
DV was FDR the first candidate who ever attempted a third term?
Teddy Roosevelt sought a third term.
FDR died in office.
Dropbear said:
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
DV was FDR the first candidate who ever attempted a third term?
Teddy Roosevelt sought a third term.
Bill Clinton sought an in term
Dear oh dear.
Dropbear said:
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
DV was FDR the first candidate who ever attempted a third term?
Teddy Roosevelt sought a third term.
Bill Clinton sought an in term
I get the jist of where you are going with that…
Peak Warming Man said:
Dropbear said:
dv said:Teddy Roosevelt sought a third term.
Bill Clinton sought an in term
Dear oh dear.
Blow by blow account of that I hear
Peak Warming Man said:
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
DV was FDR the first candidate who ever attempted a third term?
Teddy Roosevelt sought a third term.
FDR died in office.
Yeah I know.



CrazyNeutrino said:
!https://i.imgflip.com/1eeb9t.jpg
Is that your own creation?
Witty Rejoinder said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
!https://i.imgflip.com/1eeb9t.jpg
Is that your own creation?
Nup, but I could do heaps of Trump memes
no storage of material
CrazyNeutrino said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
!https://i.imgflip.com/1eeb9t.jpg
Is that your own creation?
Nup, but I could do heaps of Trump memes
no storage of material
There should be shedloads.
CrazyNeutrino said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
!https://i.imgflip.com/1eeb9t.jpg
Is that your own creation?
Nup, but I could do heaps of Trump memes
no storage of material
Here is one I did about Trump

Peak Warming Man said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Is that your own creation?
Nup, but I could do heaps of Trump memes
no storage of material
There should be shedloads.
nice work
Dont misuse meme templates
Dropbear said:
Dont misuse meme templates
this
Here are some I did about Americas gun laws


Dropbear said:
Dont misuse meme templates
Ill try not to
I know my humor can be crap at times
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Witty Rejoinder said:Is that your own creation?
Nup, but I could do heaps of Trump memes
no storage of material
Here is one I did about Trump
Subtle
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
DV was FDR the first candidate who ever attempted a third term?
Teddy Roosevelt sought a third term.
Since FDR’s time there have been two such attempts, albeit abortive.
Truman’s name appeared on the ballot of the New Hampshire primary election in 1952 but he announced a few days afterwards that he would not continue to seek a third term. He was permitted to run for a third term because the 22nd amendment explicitly excepted the current president at the time of enactment.
Lyndon Johnson sought a third term and took part in at least one primary election, but later withdrew his candidacy.
Despite the 22nd amendment, LBJ was able to run for a third term because his first term in office ran for less than 2 years (Kennedy having been assassinated late in 1963).
CrazyNeutrino said:
Dropbear said:
Dont misuse meme templates
Ill try not to
I know my humor can be crap at times
See now THAT should be in a confession bear template
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Dropbear said:
Dont misuse meme templates
Ill try not to
I know my humor can be crap at times
See now THAT should be in a confession bear template

CrazyNeutrino said:
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:Ill try not to
I know my humor can be crap at times
See now THAT should be in a confession bear template
!https://i.imgflip.com/1eo1zr.jpg
so close… yet still sooo far away…
Combining time as vice president and president, Richard Nixon is the longest server:
Nixon 4949
FDR 4422
Jefferson 4382
John Adams 4334
dv said:
Combining time as vice president and president, Richard Nixon is the longest server:Nixon 4949
FDR 4422
Jefferson 4382
John Adams 4334
Plus all the time he was a head in a jar president as well
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/hillary-clinton-election-vote-recount-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsin
blink
sibeen said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/hillary-clinton-election-vote-recount-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsinblink
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/hillary-clinton-election-vote-recount-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsin
Hillary Clinton urged to call for election vote recount in battleground states
Alleged irregularities in key states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin prompt demands for audit amid concerns over ‘foreign hackers’
A growing number of academics and activists are calling for US authorities to fully audit or recount the 2016 presidential election vote in key battleground states, in case the results could have been skewed by foreign hackers.
The loose coalition, which is urging Hillary Clinton’s campaign to join its fight, is preparing to deliver a report detailing its concerns to congressional committee chairs and federal authorities early next week, according to two people involved.
The document, which is currently 18 pages long, focuses on concerns about the results in the states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
“I’m interested in verifying the vote,” said Dr Barbara Simons, an adviser to the US election assistance commission and expert on electronic voting. “We need to have post-election ballot audits.” Simons is understood to have contributed analysis to the effort but declined to characterise the precise nature of her involvement.
A second group of analysts, led by the National Voting Rights Institute founder John Bonifaz and Professor Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan’s center for computer security and society, is also taking part in the push for a review, and has been in contact with Simons. Bonifaz declined to speak on the record.
The developments follow Clinton’s surprise defeat to Donald Trump in the 8 November vote, and come after US intelligence authorities released public assessments that Russian hackers were behind intrusions into regional electoral computer systems and the theft of emails from Democratic officials before the election.
——
I’ll bet you like eight dollars that she does not.
dv said:
sibeen said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/hillary-clinton-election-vote-recount-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsinblink
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/23/hillary-clinton-election-vote-recount-michigan-pennsylvania-wisconsin
Hillary Clinton urged to call for election vote recount in battleground states
Alleged irregularities in key states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin prompt demands for audit amid concerns over ‘foreign hackers’A growing number of academics and activists are calling for US authorities to fully audit or recount the 2016 presidential election vote in key battleground states, in case the results could have been skewed by foreign hackers.
The loose coalition, which is urging Hillary Clinton’s campaign to join its fight, is preparing to deliver a report detailing its concerns to congressional committee chairs and federal authorities early next week, according to two people involved.
The document, which is currently 18 pages long, focuses on concerns about the results in the states of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
“I’m interested in verifying the vote,” said Dr Barbara Simons, an adviser to the US election assistance commission and expert on electronic voting. “We need to have post-election ballot audits.” Simons is understood to have contributed analysis to the effort but declined to characterise the precise nature of her involvement.
A second group of analysts, led by the National Voting Rights Institute founder John Bonifaz and Professor Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan’s center for computer security and society, is also taking part in the push for a review, and has been in contact with Simons. Bonifaz declined to speak on the record.
The developments follow Clinton’s surprise defeat to Donald Trump in the 8 November vote, and come after US intelligence authorities released public assessments that Russian hackers were behind intrusions into regional electoral computer systems and the theft of emails from Democratic officials before the election.
——
I’ll bet you like eight dollars that she does not.
Hanging bits rather thatn hanging chads.
Cymek said:
dv said:
Combining time as vice president and president, Richard Nixon is the longest server:Nixon 4949
FDR 4422
Jefferson 4382
John Adams 4334Plus all the time he was a head in a jar president as well
fuck, I forgot GHWBush
dv said:
dv said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
DV was FDR the first candidate who ever attempted a third term?
Teddy Roosevelt sought a third term.
Since FDR’s time there have been two such attempts, albeit abortive.
Truman’s name appeared on the ballot of the New Hampshire primary election in 1952 but he announced a few days afterwards that he would not continue to seek a third term. He was permitted to run for a third term because the 22nd amendment explicitly excepted the current president at the time of enactment.
Lyndon Johnson sought a third term and took part in at least one primary election, but later withdrew his candidacy.
Despite the 22nd amendment, LBJ was able to run for a third term because his first term in office ran for less than 2 years (Kennedy having been assassinated late in 1963).
fuck, I forgot Ulysses S Grant who sought a third term in 1880.
dv said:
dv said:
dv said:Teddy Roosevelt sought a third term.
Since FDR’s time there have been two such attempts, albeit abortive.
Truman’s name appeared on the ballot of the New Hampshire primary election in 1952 but he announced a few days afterwards that he would not continue to seek a third term. He was permitted to run for a third term because the 22nd amendment explicitly excepted the current president at the time of enactment.
Lyndon Johnson sought a third term and took part in at least one primary election, but later withdrew his candidacy.
Despite the 22nd amendment, LBJ was able to run for a third term because his first term in office ran for less than 2 years (Kennedy having been assassinated late in 1963).fuck, I forgot Ulysses S Grant who sought a third term in 1880.
I’m beginning to think that you may be forgetful.
sibeen said:
dv said:
dv said:Since FDR’s time there have been two such attempts, albeit abortive.
Truman’s name appeared on the ballot of the New Hampshire primary election in 1952 but he announced a few days afterwards that he would not continue to seek a third term. He was permitted to run for a third term because the 22nd amendment explicitly excepted the current president at the time of enactment.
Lyndon Johnson sought a third term and took part in at least one primary election, but later withdrew his candidacy.
Despite the 22nd amendment, LBJ was able to run for a third term because his first term in office ran for less than 2 years (Kennedy having been assassinated late in 1963).fuck, I forgot Ulysses S Grant who sought a third term in 1880.
I’m beginning to think that you may be forgetful.
I can forgive myself for Grant, because he took a four year break to take a world tour before coming back to run again.
I still want to know why Comey helped get Trump elected.
From wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Comey
On October 28, 2016, less than two weeks before the presidential election, Comey announced in a letter to Congress that the FBI learned of the existence of emails that appeared to be pertinent to the investigation of Secretary Clinton’s email server and that the FBI would take steps to allow investigators to review these emails “to determine whether they contain classified information as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.” Director Comey stated in the letter that he was writing the letter to “supplement his previous testimony” before Congress.
Comey’s announcement was inconsistent with Justice Department policy and he was warned by lawyers at the Department of Justice against proceeding with his letter to Congress. According to FBI officials, Comey was aware of the policy, but considered it “guidance”, rather than an ironclad rule. Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers, as well as both the Clinton and Trump campaigns called on Comey to provide additional details. The fear that information about the newly-discovered e-mails would be leaked to the press influenced, in part, Comey’s decision to inform Congress about the relevance of the new emails to the Clinton investigation. On October 30, 2016 The New York Times published an op-ed by Richard Painter, a chief White House ethics lawyer for the George W. Bush administration, stating that he had filed a complaint against the FBI with the US Office of Special Counsel, which investigates possible violations of the Hatch Act, and with the Office of Government Ethics, in connection with the letter sent to Congress.
On November 6, 2016, Comey wrote in a second letter to Congress that, “Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July.” He thanked the FBI investigators who worked “around the clock” on the emails.
Senator Al Franken of the Senate Judiciary Committee has noted that hearings on Comey’s handling of the situation may be possible. Comey was broadly criticized for his actions on editorial pages from both the right and the left, as well as in an open letter signed by a bipartisan group of 99 former senior Justice Department officials and federal prosescutors including former Attorney General Eric Holder. According to the Clinton campaign, the letters effectively stopped the campaign’s momentum by hurting Clinton’s chances with voters who were receptive to Trump’s claims of a “rigged system.”
tauto said:
I still want to know why Comey helped get Trump elected.From wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Comey
On October 28, 2016, less than two weeks before the presidential election, Comey announced in a letter to Congress that the FBI learned of the existence of emails that appeared to be pertinent to the investigation of Secretary Clinton’s email server and that the FBI would take steps to allow investigators to review these emails “to determine whether they contain classified information as well as to assess their importance to our investigation.” Director Comey stated in the letter that he was writing the letter to “supplement his previous testimony” before Congress.
Comey’s announcement was inconsistent with Justice Department policy and he was warned by lawyers at the Department of Justice against proceeding with his letter to Congress. According to FBI officials, Comey was aware of the policy, but considered it “guidance”, rather than an ironclad rule. Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers, as well as both the Clinton and Trump campaigns called on Comey to provide additional details. The fear that information about the newly-discovered e-mails would be leaked to the press influenced, in part, Comey’s decision to inform Congress about the relevance of the new emails to the Clinton investigation. On October 30, 2016 The New York Times published an op-ed by Richard Painter, a chief White House ethics lawyer for the George W. Bush administration, stating that he had filed a complaint against the FBI with the US Office of Special Counsel, which investigates possible violations of the Hatch Act, and with the Office of Government Ethics, in connection with the letter sent to Congress.
On November 6, 2016, Comey wrote in a second letter to Congress that, “Based on our review, we have not changed our conclusions that we expressed in July.” He thanked the FBI investigators who worked “around the clock” on the emails.
Senator Al Franken of the Senate Judiciary Committee has noted that hearings on Comey’s handling of the situation may be possible. Comey was broadly criticized for his actions on editorial pages from both the right and the left, as well as in an open letter signed by a bipartisan group of 99 former senior Justice Department officials and federal prosescutors including former Attorney General Eric Holder. According to the Clinton campaign, the letters effectively stopped the campaign’s momentum by hurting Clinton’s chances with voters who were receptive to Trump’s claims of a “rigged system.”
He’s a Republican
He’s a Republican
—-
Ok, then Comey surely broke some rules about political bias in the performance of his duties.
Mary Stewart’s Merlin Trilogy refers to the first three of Mary Stewart’s quintet of Arthurian novels. It consists of:
The Crystal Cave (1970) The Hollow Hills (1973) The Last Enchantment (1979)monkey skipper said:
Mary Stewart’s Merlin Trilogy refers to the first three of Mary Stewart’s quintet of Arthurian novels. It consists of: The Crystal Cave (1970) The Hollow Hills (1973) The Last Enchantment (1979)
—-
Ah, so Comey is Merlin, mmm
With all the talk about how surprising Brexit was, and how surprising Trump was…
I’m curious, is there anyone here who doesn’t think Le Pen is going to win France next year? And that this will lead in short order to Frexit?
esselte said:
With all the talk about how surprising Brexit was, and how surprising Trump was…
I’m curious, is there anyone here who doesn’t think Le Pen is going to win France next year? And that this will lead in short order to Frexit?
Maybe if everyone thinks he will win, he won’t.
esselte said:
With all the talk about how surprising Brexit was, and how surprising Trump was…
I’m curious, is there anyone here who doesn’t think Le Pen is going to win France next year? And that this will lead in short order to Frexit?
Witty Rejoinder said:
esselte said:With all the talk about how surprising Brexit was, and how surprising Trump was…
I’m curious, is there anyone here who doesn’t think Le Pen is going to win France next year? And that this will lead in short order to Frexit?
I don’t think Le Pen will win against a centre-right candidate in the run-off election.
Damn
He will win now.
Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’
That is bad for Americas future.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
esselte said:With all the talk about how surprising Brexit was, and how surprising Trump was…
I’m curious, is there anyone here who doesn’t think Le Pen is going to win France next year? And that this will lead in short order to Frexit?
I don’t think Le Pen will win against a centre-right candidate in the run-off election.Damn
He will win now.
In today’s environment, Le Pen is probably considered centre-right…
dv said:
In today’s environment, Le Pen is probably considered centre-right…
While Le Pen has moved her party towards the centre there still exists the newly renamed Republicans who are closer to the centre than the National Front who couldn’t be called leftwing.
According i don’t think the NF should be termed centre right.
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:In today’s environment, Le Pen is probably considered centre-right…
While Le Pen has moved her party towards the centre there still exists the newly renamed Republicans who are closer to the centre than the National Front who couldn’t be called leftwing.
Yes I suppose my point was an emotive one, expressing my feelings about the normalization of the far right, rather than literally true.
Donald Trump’s U-turn on climate change might not actually lead to any work to preserve the environment, he has said.
The President-elect was heralded for changing his mind on global warming when he appeared to acknowledge that there was some connection between humanity and climate change.
But he has said that it may be too expensive for the country to actually carry out and that he is still going to pull the US out of important environment deals.
More…
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/us/politics/trump-new-york-times-interview-transcript.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share
I’m nearly half way through reading this and I don’t think I can read anymore. Perhaps it is because I am running a fever. Perhaps it is just a heap of drivel.
sarahs mum said:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/us/politics/trump-new-york-times-interview-transcript.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-shareI’m nearly half way through reading this and I don’t think I can read anymore. Perhaps it is because I am running a fever. Perhaps it is just a heap of drivel.
Now imagine that heap of drivel spread all over the Trump administration.
CrazyNeutrino said:
sarahs mum said:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/us/politics/trump-new-york-times-interview-transcript.html?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-shareI’m nearly half way through reading this and I don’t think I can read anymore. Perhaps it is because I am running a fever. Perhaps it is just a heap of drivel.
Now imagine that heap of drivel spread all over the Trump administration.
Some things can’t be fixed by antibiotics.

“An unknown artist’s interpretation of America when Donald Trump becomes president.”
I think it’s been at this level for quite some time.
The Normalization of ‘Normalize’ Is a Sign of the New Normal
The word “normalize” has become, well, normal. Long before Donald Trump became the president-elect, his detractors warned against “normalizing” his myriad violations of campaign decorum: the bigotry and misogyny, the Putin-philia and cavalier talk about nuclear weapons.
More…
Only another eight years, Crazy.
By that time Libya will have a government, the fighting in Aleppo will be almost over and Iraqi troops will be almost in the centre of Mosel.
Peak Warming Man said:
Only another eight years, Crazy.
By that time Libya will have a government, the fighting in Aleppo will be almost over and Iraqi troops will be almost in the centre of Mosel.
And creationist classes and Russian language courses will be compulsory in all US schools. Science will be banned except in “approved circumstances”.
All media outlets critical of the state will be subject to “patriotism tests” and arbitrary shut-down.
The US constitution will be changed to allow Putin to stand as the Republican candidate for the next election, without leaving the Kremlin.
Democratic Party candidates will need to be selected by the president under emergency laws, as the nation spirals into Great Depression II.
Bubblecar said:
Democratic Party candidates will need to be selected by the president under emergency laws,
I expect that there is quite a few people in the Democratic party who wish this law had come into being about a year ago.
Peak Warming Man said:
Only another eight years, Crazy.
By that time Libya will have a government, the fighting in Aleppo will be almost over and Iraqi troops will be almost in the centre of Mosel.
merriam-webster.com
The New ‘Normalize’
Is the meaning of ‘normalization’ changing?
It will sometimes happen that a word suddenly appears everywhere. In the wake of the 2016 presidential election, two such words are currently in the ether: the verb normalize and its related noun, normalization.
More…
Or a word is just noticed more often as a result of who is using it…
Bubblecar said:
Peak Warming Man said:
Only another eight years, Crazy.
By that time Libya will have a government, the fighting in Aleppo will be almost over and Iraqi troops will be almost in the centre of Mosel.
And creationist classes and Russian language courses will be compulsory in all US schools. Science will be banned except in “approved circumstances”.
All media outlets critical of the state will be subject to “patriotism tests” and arbitrary shut-down.
The US constitution will be changed to allow Putin to stand as the Republican candidate for the next election, without leaving the Kremlin.
Democratic Party candidates will need to be selected by the president under emergency laws, as the nation spirals into Great Depression II.
People are weird about science, just about everything people do has some relationship to science
furious said:
- It will sometimes happen that a word suddenly appears everywhere.
Or a word is just noticed more often as a result of who is using it…
Let’s see if “Knob gobbler“can have a run?
CrazyNeutrino said:
The Normalization of ‘Normalize’ Is a Sign of the New NormalThe word “normalize” has become, well, normal. Long before Donald Trump became the president-elect, his detractors warned against “normalizing” his myriad violations of campaign decorum: the bigotry and misogyny, the Putin-philia and cavalier talk about nuclear weapons.
More…
?
It has been a common word for decades
dv said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
The Normalization of ‘Normalize’ Is a Sign of the New NormalThe word “normalize” has become, well, normal. Long before Donald Trump became the president-elect, his detractors warned against “normalizing” his myriad violations of campaign decorum: the bigotry and misogyny, the Putin-philia and cavalier talk about nuclear weapons.
More…
?
It has been a common word for decades
we know, but the words usage went up 50 percent on the internet after the election
The Trump effect and the normalization of hate in Quebec
same thing here with the 100,000 who voted for one nation
CrazyNeutrino said:
The Trump effect and the normalization of hate in Quebecsame thing here with the 100,000 who voted for one nation
100,000 right wing bogans
U.S. Hate Crimes Surge 6%, Fueled by Attacks on Muslims
Claims of hate crimes possibly linked to Trump’s election reported across the US
CrazyNeutrino said:
U.S. Hate Crimes Surge 6%, Fueled by Attacks on MuslimsClaims of hate crimes possibly linked to Trump’s election reported across the US

PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
U.S. Hate Crimes Surge 6%, Fueled by Attacks on MuslimsClaims of hate crimes possibly linked to Trump’s election reported across the US
Why do some men and women hate each other?
Is it a chemical deficiency that creates abnormal sexual tension displaying behaviour as hate rather than than normal sexual tension where each gender manages to get along?
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
U.S. Hate Crimes Surge 6%, Fueled by Attacks on MuslimsClaims of hate crimes possibly linked to Trump’s election reported across the US
Why do some men and women hate each other?
Is it a chemical deficiency that creates abnormal sexual tension displaying behaviour as hate rather than than normal sexual tension where each gender manages to get along?
I dislike people because they are dicks, everything else is irrelevant.
That being said I’m not a people person, I’m not rude or anything but can’t be bothered socialising most of the time.
People are people…
>Why do some men and women hate each other?
can’t say I know any, but I do live under a rock. I should get out more and experience it I suppose.
Cymek said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:
Why do some men and women hate each other?
Is it a chemical deficiency that creates abnormal sexual tension displaying behaviour as hate rather than than normal sexual tension where each gender manages to get along?
I dislike people because they are dicks, everything else is irrelevant.
That being said I’m not a people person, I’m not rude or anything but can’t be bothered socialising most of the time.
Im not a socializer either.
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
U.S. Hate Crimes Surge 6%, Fueled by Attacks on MuslimsClaims of hate crimes possibly linked to Trump’s election reported across the US
Why do some men and women hate each other?
Is it a chemical deficiency that creates abnormal sexual tension displaying behaviour as hate rather than than normal sexual tension where each gender manages to get along?
I’m going for..experience. Bad experiences.
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
U.S. Hate Crimes Surge 6%, Fueled by Attacks on MuslimsClaims of hate crimes possibly linked to Trump’s election reported across the US
Why do some men and women hate each other?
Is it a chemical deficiency that creates abnormal sexual tension displaying behaviour as hate rather than than normal sexual tension where each gender manages to get along?
It is no longer a requirement to hate women to be labeled a misogynist.
furious said:
- Why do some men and women hate each other?
People are people…
Especially strange when you are a stranger
i’ll add something that I think is important, of the breeding thing, recombining DNA
your partner doesn’t have any of your DNA, but children do.
transition said:
i’ll add something that I think is important, of the breeding thing, recombining DNAyour partner doesn’t have any of your DNA, but children do.
Yeah so in the long run they are more valuable and important to you than a partner
Cymek said:
transition said:
i’ll add something that I think is important, of the breeding thing, recombining DNAyour partner doesn’t have any of your DNA, but children do.
Yeah so in the long run they are more valuable and important to you than a partner
yeah, I think it has broader dimensions too.
AwesomeO said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
PermeateFree said:
Why do some men and women hate each other?
Is it a chemical deficiency that creates abnormal sexual tension displaying behaviour as hate rather than than normal sexual tension where each gender manages to get along?
It is no longer a requirement to hate women to be labeled a misogynist.
How?
AwesomeO said:
CrazyNeutrino said:Why do some men and women hate each other?
Is it a chemical deficiency that creates abnormal sexual tension displaying behaviour as hate rather than than normal sexual tension where each gender manages to get along?
It is no longer a requirement to hate women to be labeled a misogynist.
but that the definition of misogynist
CrazyNeutrino said:
AwesomeO said:
CrazyNeutrino said:Why do some men and women hate each other?
Is it a chemical deficiency that creates abnormal sexual tension displaying behaviour as hate rather than than normal sexual tension where each gender manages to get along?
It is no longer a requirement to hate women to be labeled a misogynist.
How?
An uncomplimentary opinion of political spectrum can be substituted for misogyny. An expression of dissatisfaction with argument can be substituted for misogyny.
Funnily enough a nasty and sneering opinion of a woman’s weight or dress can be misogyny but only if you are a bloke. If you are a female it’s ok despite them being the main offenders.
An activist at Macquarie Dictionary changed the dictionary’s definition of misogyny to suite what Julia Gillard was describing at the time.
They were crazy times.
Peak Warming Man said:
An activist at Macquarie Dictionary changed the dictionary’s definition of misogyny to suite what Julia Gillard was describing at the time.
They were crazy times.
That’s interesting.
Do you have the before and after definitions for our edification?
S’OK PWM, I’ve done your job for you:
Ms Gillard made headlines around the world last week after she used a 15-minute speech in Parliament to accuse Opposition Leader Tony Abbott of being a misogynist.
The current edition of the dictionary defines misogyny as “hatred of women”.
But the dictionary’s editor, Sue Butler, says the definition will now be broadened to include “entrenched prejudice against women”.
Yes, what bloody politically correct nonsense to try and change the meaning of misogyny to something as harmless as “entrenched prejudice against women”.
The Rev Dodgson said:
S’OK PWM, I’ve done your job for you:Ms Gillard made headlines around the world last week after she used a 15-minute speech in Parliament to accuse Opposition Leader Tony Abbott of being a misogynist.
The current edition of the dictionary defines misogyny as “hatred of women”.
But the dictionary’s editor, Sue Butler, says the definition will now be broadened to include “entrenched prejudice against women”.
Yes, what bloody politically correct nonsense to try and change the meaning of misogyny to something as harmless as “entrenched prejudice against women”.
Sounds like a verballing. PWM said the definition was changed after her speech, which is what your post says. It was big news at the time, amazing you missed it.
And a quick Internet search suggests that not only has this Sue Butler changed the Macquarie, she’s got her own revised definition into every other bloody English dictionary in the world as well!
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
S’OK PWM, I’ve done your job for you:Ms Gillard made headlines around the world last week after she used a 15-minute speech in Parliament to accuse Opposition Leader Tony Abbott of being a misogynist.
The current edition of the dictionary defines misogyny as “hatred of women”.
But the dictionary’s editor, Sue Butler, says the definition will now be broadened to include “entrenched prejudice against women”.
Yes, what bloody politically correct nonsense to try and change the meaning of misogyny to something as harmless as “entrenched prejudice against women”.
Sounds like a verballing. PWM said the definition was changed after her speech, which is what your post says. It was big news at the time, amazing you missed it.
I don’t know what a “verballing” is.
More likely I didn’t take much notice at the time, and forgot about it.
Changing the Macquarie Dictionary to reflect common usage and every other major English dictionary is really not that big a deal after all.
>entrenched prejudice against women”.
bit of a tricky word shift though, then it requires substantiating (or should) entrenched.
>>Why do some men and women hate each other?<<
I’m pretty sure that question is actually
Why do some people hate each other?
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
S’OK PWM, I’ve done your job for you:Ms Gillard made headlines around the world last week after she used a 15-minute speech in Parliament to accuse Opposition Leader Tony Abbott of being a misogynist.
The current edition of the dictionary defines misogyny as “hatred of women”.
But the dictionary’s editor, Sue Butler, says the definition will now be broadened to include “entrenched prejudice against women”.
Yes, what bloody politically correct nonsense to try and change the meaning of misogyny to something as harmless as “entrenched prejudice against women”.
Sounds like a verballing. PWM said the definition was changed after her speech, which is what your post says. It was big news at the time, amazing you missed it.
I don’t know what a “verballing” is.
More likely I didn’t take much notice at the time, and forgot about it.
Changing the Macquarie Dictionary to reflect common usage and every other major English dictionary is really not that big a deal after all.
the alt-right don’t think like us rev.
Was just listening to Radio National, I’m out in the sticks. Someone was being interviewed about the Trump victory. The interviewee was going on about how he’d picked the result and supported Trump, although the political elites had all picked it wrong. How the people of south western Sydney loved the Donald and loved his policies. The media and the elites were against the Donald world wide, yet he was over to overcome this and use people power toride to victory…blah, blah.
I’m thinking to myself “who is this right wing nutter?”
It was Mark Latham :)
sibeen said:
Was just listening to Radio National, I’m out in the sticks. Someone was being interviewed about the Trump victory. The interviewee was going on about how he’d picked the result and supported Trump, although the political elites had all picked it wrong. How the people of south western Sydney loved the Donald and loved his policies. The media and the elites were against the Donald world wide, yet he was over to overcome this and use people power toride to victory…blah, blah.I’m thinking to myself “who is this right wing nutter?”
It was Mark Latham :)
missed a bullet there.
(ok so this has been said numerous times. it is now deserving of it’s own standard answer. to be held in the same esteem as WB&D,)
JudgeMental said:
missed a bullet there.
I left that unstated on purpose :)
sibeen said:
JudgeMental said:missed a bullet there.
I left that unstated on purpose :)
thanks for the intro then.
sibeen said:
Was just listening to Radio National, I’m out in the sticks. Someone was being interviewed about the Trump victory. The interviewee was going on about how he’d picked the result and supported Trump, although the political elites had all picked it wrong. How the people of south western Sydney loved the Donald and loved his policies. The media and the elites were against the Donald world wide, yet he was over to overcome this and use people power toride to victory…blah, blah.I’m thinking to myself “who is this right wing nutter?”
It was Mark Latham :)
Mark Latham and Andrew Bolt are now bosom buddies.
Witty Rejoinder said:
sibeen said:
Was just listening to Radio National, I’m out in the sticks. Someone was being interviewed about the Trump victory. The interviewee was going on about how he’d picked the result and supported Trump, although the political elites had all picked it wrong. How the people of south western Sydney loved the Donald and loved his policies. The media and the elites were against the Donald world wide, yet he was over to overcome this and use people power toride to victory…blah, blah.I’m thinking to myself “who is this right wing nutter?”
It was Mark Latham :)
Mark Latham and Andrew Bolt are now bosom buddies.
the A-Team
AwesomeO said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
AwesomeO said:It is no longer a requirement to hate women to be labeled a misogynist.
How?
An uncomplimentary opinion of political spectrum can be substituted for misogyny. An expression of dissatisfaction with argument can be substituted for misogyny.
Funnily enough a nasty and sneering opinion of a woman’s weight or dress can be misogyny but only if you are a bloke. If you are a female it’s ok despite them being the main offenders.
Oh, my good goddess!!!!
The words….the thought process…..hahaha!!!
>An uncomplimentary opinion of political spectrum can be substituted for misogyny. An expression of dissatisfaction with argument can be substituted for misogyny.
probably generalizing “women” is fairly useless anyway, well, the uses of the term are quite limited really.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-25/jill-stein-reaches-target-to-recount-in-us-election-swing-states/8056140
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/nov/24/tasmanian-town-may-rename-cricket-oval-after-donald-trump
——————————————
Facebook
936 Hobart ABC post.
Is Donald J Trump the best name for the Westbury football oval?
Councillor John Temple made the suggestion at the November meeting saying Mr Trump was “likely to be the greatest agent of change this century..
What would you rename the oval?
15 Comments
Comments
Dave Pearson
Dave Pearson Ovaly McOval
Like · Reply · 12 · 3 hrs
SirJennifer Dixon
SirJennifer Dixon Ovaly McOvalface
Like · Reply · 4 · 1 hr
spews
Michael V said:
spews
Yep. The word Trump is such an awkward name…..way before the whole election debacle.
>What would you rename the oval?
I wouldn’t rename it. Westbury Football Oval is accurate and unpretentious.
Bubblecar said:
>What would you rename the oval?I wouldn’t rename it. Westbury Football Oval is accurate and unpretentious.
:)
http://www.theage.com.au/world/us-election/donald-trumps-family-settle-in-for-the-good-times-20161124-gsx8u8.html
Anyone got any decent Brack Friday Bunduru deals

I don’t get it.
What a guy.
Witty Rejoinder said:
http://www.theage.com.au/world/us-election/donald-trumps-family-settle-in-for-the-good-times-20161124-gsx8u8.html
geeez.
OJudgeMental said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
http://www.theage.com.au/world/us-election/donald-trumps-family-settle-in-for-the-good-times-20161124-gsx8u8.html
geeez.
emolument…. my word of the day
onald Trump has announced another cabinet pick that’s distressing to LGBT people and progressives in general — billionaire and antigay activist Betsy DeVos for secretary of Education.
DeVos and her husband, Richard DeVos, Jr., derive their wealth from Michigan-based Amway..
https://forum.philosophicalatheism.com/articles/254-trump-picks-antigay-activist-betsy-devos-for-secretary-of-education
Mark Blyth, who accurately predicted Brexit and Trump explains in clear language how globalization and predatory capitalism are failing people throughout the world and why that means more Brexits and Trumps are on the way. Hello Pauline
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K8bf6dbYt4&feature=share
Not saying I agree with much of it but it’s an interesting discussion.
No mention of racism?
furious said:
- Mark Blyth, who accurately predicted Brexit and Trump explains in clear language how globalization and predatory capitalism are failing people throughout the world and why that means more Brexits and Trumps are on the way.
No mention of racism?
Not really.
furious said:
- Mark Blyth, who accurately predicted Brexit and Trump explains in clear language how globalization and predatory capitalism are failing people throughout the world and why that means more Brexits and Trumps are on the way.
No mention of racism?
You need another mechanism other than suddenly turning racist redneck and moronic to explain why states that previously endorsed Obama now endorsed Trump. Were they racist then?
A more realistic explanation would be that Trump promised change and Clinton promised more of the same.
AwesomeO said:
furious said:
- Mark Blyth, who accurately predicted Brexit and Trump explains in clear language how globalization and predatory capitalism are failing people throughout the world and why that means more Brexits and Trumps are on the way.
No mention of racism?
You need another mechanism other than suddenly turning racist redneck and moronic to explain why states that previously endorsed Obama now endorsed Trump. Were they racist then?
A more realistic explanation would be that Trump promised change and Clinton promised more of the same.
Yes, of course we have to find just one reason.
There is always one reason for everything.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
furious said:
- Mark Blyth, who accurately predicted Brexit and Trump explains in clear language how globalization and predatory capitalism are failing people throughout the world and why that means more Brexits and Trumps are on the way.
No mention of racism?
You need another mechanism other than suddenly turning racist redneck and moronic to explain why states that previously endorsed Obama now endorsed Trump. Were they racist then?
A more realistic explanation would be that Trump promised change and Clinton promised more of the same.
Yes, of course we have to find just one reason.
There is always one reason for everything.
Righteo, racism it is then.
Or if you want complex, how about lashings of red neck morons thrown in for good measure. There ya go.
Maybe the Rev can explain why the states that voted for Obama suddenly turned racist?
The racists didn’t get out to vote last time?
AwesomeO said:
Maybe the Rev can explain why the states that voted for Obama suddenly turned racist?
I think the Rev was being sarcastic. He often rails against either-or-ism.
furious said:
- Maybe the Rev can explain why the states that voted for Obama suddenly turned racist?
The racists didn’t get out to vote last time?
Explained. The Rev has his one reason. No further thought required.
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:
Maybe the Rev can explain why the states that voted for Obama suddenly turned racist?
I think the Rev was being sarcastic. He often rails against either-or-ism.
I hate to say it but…me too.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
furious said:
- Mark Blyth, who accurately predicted Brexit and Trump explains in clear language how globalization and predatory capitalism are failing people throughout the world and why that means more Brexits and Trumps are on the way.
No mention of racism?
You need another mechanism other than suddenly turning racist redneck and moronic to explain why states that previously endorsed Obama now endorsed Trump. Were they racist then?
A more realistic explanation would be that Trump promised change and Clinton promised more of the same.
Yes, of course we have to find just one reason.
There is always one reason for everything.
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:
Maybe the Rev can explain why the states that voted for Obama suddenly turned racist?
I think the Rev was being sarcastic. He often rails against either-or-ism.
Funny, I am a matrix sort of person myself considering multiple inputs and various weightings.
Maybe I should keep my life simple and just go with the forum vibe that Americans are stupid. Simples.
Witty Rejoinder said:
furious said:
- Mark Blyth, who accurately predicted Brexit and Trump explains in clear language how globalization and predatory capitalism are failing people throughout the world and why that means more Brexits and Trumps are on the way.
No mention of racism?
Not really.
Its the new normal.
AwesomeO said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:
Maybe the Rev can explain why the states that voted for Obama suddenly turned racist?
I think the Rev was being sarcastic. He often rails against either-or-ism.
Funny, I am a matrix sort of person myself considering multiple inputs and various weightings.
Maybe I should keep my life simple and just go with the forum vibe that Americans are stupid. Simples.
No doubt they had various complicated reasons for shooting themselves in the foot, but one major one would be a willingness to vote for someone who has no intention of doing anything effective to address their problems, but who appeared to be making noises they found appealing.
JudgeMental said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:You need another mechanism other than suddenly turning racist redneck and moronic to explain why states that previously endorsed Obama now endorsed Trump. Were they racist then?
A more realistic explanation would be that Trump promised change and Clinton promised more of the same.
Yes, of course we have to find just one reason.
There is always one reason for everything.
Maybe then the Rev can expand on his sarcasm.
It would appear that few if any listened to that link all the way through, because racism and rednecks were not even mentioned because they were not pertinent. It is about economics and predatory capitalism, which is what I have been promoting here for some time and copping a fair amount of flack as a Trump supporter. I would strongly suggest you do watch it in its entirety, because it is pretty well spot on, not just for America, but many parts of the world. It goes a long way to explain why there are so many dissatisfied people in the Western World and why a dramatic change is required.
Bubblecar said:
AwesomeO said:
Witty Rejoinder said:I think the Rev was being sarcastic. He often rails against either-or-ism.
Funny, I am a matrix sort of person myself considering multiple inputs and various weightings.
Maybe I should keep my life simple and just go with the forum vibe that Americans are stupid. Simples.
No doubt they had various complicated reasons for shooting themselves in the foot, but one major one would be a willingness to vote for someone who has no intention of doing anything effective to address their problems, but who appeared to be making noises they found appealing.
sold a dream by a flim flam man.
Bubblecar said:
AwesomeO said:
Witty Rejoinder said:I think the Rev was being sarcastic. He often rails against either-or-ism.
Funny, I am a matrix sort of person myself considering multiple inputs and various weightings.
Maybe I should keep my life simple and just go with the forum vibe that Americans are stupid. Simples.
No doubt they had various complicated reasons for shooting themselves in the foot, but one major one would be a willingness to vote for someone who has no intention of doing anything effective to address their problems, but who appeared to be making noises they found appealing.
Sounds reasonable. People usually vote out of self interest.
AwesomeO said:
Maybe the Rev can explain why the states that voted for Obama suddenly turned racist?
Maybe I couldn’t, since not one letter of my brief recent statement in this thread suggests that I think states suddenly turned anything.
http://www.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/sorry-donald-trump-apples-iphones-should-still-be-made-in-china-20161124-gsx5lp.html
Bubblecar said:
AwesomeO said:
Witty Rejoinder said:I think the Rev was being sarcastic. He often rails against either-or-ism.
Funny, I am a matrix sort of person myself considering multiple inputs and various weightings.
Maybe I should keep my life simple and just go with the forum vibe that Americans are stupid. Simples.
No doubt they had various complicated reasons for shooting themselves in the foot, but one major one would be a willingness to vote for someone who has no intention of doing anything effective to address their problems, but who appeared to be making noises they found appealing.
He makes noises that keep changing, I think he make noises to appeal to the moment, and I think a lot of his advisers are behind his constant changes.
We will see more back flips and softening of his more outrageous policies.
Witty Rejoinder said:
AwesomeO said:
Maybe the Rev can explain why the states that voted for Obama suddenly turned racist?
I think the Rev was being sarcastic. He often rails against either-or-ism.
More ironic than sarcastic.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
Maybe the Rev can explain why the states that voted for Obama suddenly turned racist?
Maybe I couldn’t, since not one letter of my brief recent statement in this thread suggests that I think states suddenly turned anything.
Fascinating, so your brief recent post was intended to….?
CrazyNeutrino said:
He makes noises that keep changing, I think he make noises to appeal to the moment, and I think a lot of his advisers are behind his constant changes.
We will see more back flips and softening of his more outrageous policies.
He’s a compulsive liar so it’s hard to pin him down on this or that position. That’s the way he likes it, keep everyone guessing. But that’s not going to be sustainable without his presidency proving highly unstable.
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
Maybe the Rev can explain why the states that voted for Obama suddenly turned racist?
Maybe I couldn’t, since not one letter of my brief recent statement in this thread suggests that I think states suddenly turned anything.
Fascinating, so your brief recent post was intended to….?
Suggest that there were many and varied reasons for the small change in vote numbers required for people switching from Obama to Trump, amongst which Trumps appeal to the racism of large numbers of people was one significant factor.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Maybe I couldn’t, since not one letter of my brief recent statement in this thread suggests that I think states suddenly turned anything.
Fascinating, so your brief recent post was intended to….?
Suggest that there were many and varied reasons for the small change in vote numbers required for people switching from Obama to Trump, amongst which Trumps appeal to the racism of large numbers of people was one significant factor.
Would that racist component be objecting to illegal immigration of millions of Mexicans?
Bubblecar said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
He makes noises that keep changing, I think he make noises to appeal to the moment, and I think a lot of his advisers are behind his constant changes.
We will see more back flips and softening of his more outrageous policies.
He’s a compulsive liar so it’s hard to pin him down on this or that position. That’s the way he likes it, keep everyone guessing. But that’s not going to be sustainable without his presidency proving highly unstable.
You two would really benefit from a big picture view of the US Elections and Donald Trump, plus more importantly why such a person could be elected President. Your criticism of Trump may turn out to be correct, but it does not change the discontent of public sentiment. Such things as Trump gaining notoriety, is part of a much larger movement and one that is very likely to grow much more. If you want to gain some real insight that should influence your current outlook, then it would be worth your while to listen to the link Curve gave.
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:Fascinating, so your brief recent post was intended to….?
Suggest that there were many and varied reasons for the small change in vote numbers required for people switching from Obama to Trump, amongst which Trumps appeal to the racism of large numbers of people was one significant factor.
Would that racist component be objecting to illegal immigration of millions of Mexicans?
Well most people object to people doing illegal things, so I expect they would.
What that has to do with the matter under discussion, I don’t know.
I really miss Christopher Hitchens.
:(
PermeateFree said:
Bubblecar said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
He makes noises that keep changing, I think he make noises to appeal to the moment, and I think a lot of his advisers are behind his constant changes.
We will see more back flips and softening of his more outrageous policies.
He’s a compulsive liar so it’s hard to pin him down on this or that position. That’s the way he likes it, keep everyone guessing. But that’s not going to be sustainable without his presidency proving highly unstable.
You two would really benefit from a big picture view of the US Elections and Donald Trump, plus more importantly why such a person could be elected President. Your criticism of Trump may turn out to be correct, but it does not change the discontent of public sentiment. Such things as Trump gaining notoriety, is part of a much larger movement and one that is very likely to grow much more. If you want to gain some real insight that should influence your current outlook, then it would be worth your while to listen to the link Curve gave.
Not me, I didn’t give any links.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Suggest that there were many and varied reasons for the small change in vote numbers required for people switching from Obama to Trump, amongst which Trumps appeal to the racism of large numbers of people was one significant factor.
Would that racist component be objecting to illegal immigration of millions of Mexicans?
Well most people object to people doing illegal things, so I expect they would.
What that has to do with the matter under discussion, I don’t know.
You brought up the appeal to racism. So maybe you can clarify what you meant by that then?
AwesomeO said:
PermeateFree said:
Bubblecar said:He’s a compulsive liar so it’s hard to pin him down on this or that position. That’s the way he likes it, keep everyone guessing. But that’s not going to be sustainable without his presidency proving highly unstable.
You two would really benefit from a big picture view of the US Elections and Donald Trump, plus more importantly why such a person could be elected President. Your criticism of Trump may turn out to be correct, but it does not change the discontent of public sentiment. Such things as Trump gaining notoriety, is part of a much larger movement and one that is very likely to grow much more. If you want to gain some real insight that should influence your current outlook, then it would be worth your while to listen to the link Curve gave.
Not me, I didn’t give any links.
it was DV fanboi Witty.
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:Would that racist component be objecting to illegal immigration of millions of Mexicans?
Well most people object to people doing illegal things, so I expect they would.
What that has to do with the matter under discussion, I don’t know.
You brought up the appeal to racism. So maybe you can clarify what you meant by that then?
thought that was furious?
AwesomeO said:
PermeateFree said:
Bubblecar said:He’s a compulsive liar so it’s hard to pin him down on this or that position. That’s the way he likes it, keep everyone guessing. But that’s not going to be sustainable without his presidency proving highly unstable.
You two would really benefit from a big picture view of the US Elections and Donald Trump, plus more importantly why such a person could be elected President. Your criticism of Trump may turn out to be correct, but it does not change the discontent of public sentiment. Such things as Trump gaining notoriety, is part of a much larger movement and one that is very likely to grow much more. If you want to gain some real insight that should influence your current outlook, then it would be worth your while to listen to the link Curve gave.
Not me, I didn’t give any links.
Sorry, it was Witty.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K8bf6dbYt4&feature=share
JudgeMental said:
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Well most people object to people doing illegal things, so I expect they would.
What that has to do with the matter under discussion, I don’t know.
You brought up the appeal to racism. So maybe you can clarify what you meant by that then?
thought that was furious?
“Suggest that there were many and varied reasons for the small change in vote numbers required for people switching from Obama to Trump, amongst which Trumps appeal to the racism of large numbers of people was one significant factor.”
In the case of Trump, we know that the Hillary Clinton campaign secretly build up Trump against other Republican Primary candidates, having identified him as one of the three candidates that the mainstream would find the most unpalatable. They did not hope to win by convincing the people of their candidate’s virtues – they were probably aware that Hillary Clinton represented everything that the American mainstream despised – so they wanted to create a situation where the alternative would be so unthinkable that every sensible voter would have to rally behind Hillary. Indeed, many leftists who disagree with Hillary on almost everything were forced to recommend “if you live in a swing state, hold your nose and vote for Hillary.” However, the American establishment was not able to control the wave of popular anger they had helped unleash.
https://diem25.org/the-establishment-gambled-and-lost/
AwesomeO said:
JudgeMental said:
AwesomeO said:You brought up the appeal to racism. So maybe you can clarify what you meant by that then?
thought that was furious?
“Suggest that there were many and varied reasons for the small change in vote numbers required for people switching from Obama to Trump, amongst which Trumps appeal to the racism of large numbers of people was one significant factor.”
See I don’tr know how many DID switch from Obama to Trump. I expect a lot switched from Obama to not voting, and a lot switched from not voting to Trump, and it wasn’t the same set of people.
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:Would that racist component be objecting to illegal immigration of millions of Mexicans?
Well most people object to people doing illegal things, so I expect they would.
What that has to do with the matter under discussion, I don’t know.
You brought up the appeal to racism. So maybe you can clarify what you meant by that then?
I didn’t bring up the appeal to racism.
What do you need clarifying exactly? The phrase seems fairly clear to me.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:Well most people object to people doing illegal things, so I expect they would.
What that has to do with the matter under discussion, I don’t know.
You brought up the appeal to racism. So maybe you can clarify what you meant by that then?
I didn’t bring up the appeal to racism.
Your words
“Suggest that there were many and varied reasons for the small change in vote numbers required for people switching from Obama to Trump, amongst which Trumps appeal to the racism of large numbers of people was one significant factor.”Apologies if you were quoting someone else and I missed it.
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:You brought up the appeal to racism. So maybe you can clarify what you meant by that then?
I didn’t bring up the appeal to racism.
Your words
“Suggest that there were many and varied reasons for the small change in vote numbers required for people switching from Obama to Trump, amongst which Trumps appeal to the racism of large numbers of people was one significant factor.”Apologies if you were quoting someone else and I missed it.
For some reason I can’t open the whole thread, but I was under the impression that someone suggested that appeal to racism was significant in Trumps winning, and you suggested it was all something else.
I was just saying that there were many reasons for his winning, and appeal to racism was a significant one, that’s all.
Do you really dispute that?
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I didn’t bring up the appeal to racism.
Your words
“Suggest that there were many and varied reasons for the small change in vote numbers required for people switching from Obama to Trump, amongst which Trumps appeal to the racism of large numbers of people was one significant factor.”Apologies if you were quoting someone else and I missed it.
For some reason I can’t open the whole thread, but I was under the impression that someone suggested that appeal to racism was significant in Trumps winning, and you suggested it was all something else.
I was just saying that there were many reasons for his winning, and appeal to racism was a significant one, that’s all.
Do you really dispute that?
Not significant, the suggestion was it was the main reason, which is why I suggested that those same racists voted for Obama so maybe there needed to be another explanation.
You have still not been able to say what Trumps appeal to racism was apart from discounting objecting to illegal Mexican immigration, which by the way, I agree, it’s not racist to object to illegal Mexican immigration.
AwesomeO said:
You have still not been able to say what Trumps appeal to racism was apart from discounting objecting to illegal Mexican immigration, which by the way, I agree, it’s not racist to object to illegal Mexican immigration.
What the hell are you talking about. Who suggested that objecting to illegal immigration was racist?
Are you really saying that you can’t see anything in Trumps campaign that was specifically designed to appeal to racist opinion?
I find that hard to believe.
But if you really need something, the proposal to ban all muslim immigration is a good start.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:You have still not been able to say what Trumps appeal to racism was apart from discounting objecting to illegal Mexican immigration, which by the way, I agree, it’s not racist to object to illegal Mexican immigration.
What the hell are you talking about. Who suggested that objecting to illegal immigration was racist?
Are you really saying that you can’t see anything in Trumps campaign that was specifically designed to appeal to racist opinion?
I find that hard to believe.
But if you really need something, the proposal to ban all muslim immigration is a good start.
I was asking you. You had struggled so far so absent anything from you I suggested maybe you thought objecting to illegal immigration was racist. Some people do so forgive me.
AwesomeO said:
I was asking you. You had struggled so far so absent anything from you I suggested maybe you thought objecting to illegal immigration was racist. Some people do so forgive me.
I had “struggled” had I?
It’s almost like you are trying to provoke an argument, rather than have a sensible discussion.
The Rev Dodgson said:
AwesomeO said:I was asking you. You had struggled so far so absent anything from you I suggested maybe you thought objecting to illegal immigration was racist. Some people do so forgive me.
I had “struggled” had I?
It’s almost like you are trying to provoke an argument, rather than have a sensible discussion.
Lucky it was only almost.
Really dodged a bullet with this guy:
Greens Party Presidential Candidate 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajamu_Baraka
Witty Rejoinder said:
Really dodged a bullet with this guy:Greens Party Presidential Candidate 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ajamu_Baraka
Opps. Vice-Presidential.
So are we all still keen on a presidential republic for Australia?
dv said:
So are we all still keen on a presidential republic for Australia?
long live queen turnbull and all his mates
huzzah!
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/lets-party-like-its-1933-inside-the-disturbing-alt-right-world-of-richard-spencer/2016/11/22/cf81dc74-aff7-11e6-840f-e3ebab6bcdd3_story.html
dv said:
So are we all still keen on a presidential republic for Australia?
Only if we relax gun laws, so that’s a no from me.
So now I’m pro-monarchy, pro-Republican, and a few days ago I read an Andrew Bolt column which I didn’t completely disagree with. Either the whole world has gone mad, or I am losing my mind! :-)
<<checks the="" continuing="" insane="" reactions="" to="" Trump's="" win="" on="" most="" of="" the="" forums="" and="" social="" media="" platforms="" that="" I="" read="">> Thank God! It is the world that has gone mad.
dv said:
I do, but not as a popularly elected president. Someone who is appointed by a two-thirds majority of both houses of parliament sitting together. Basically a ceremonial position, opening pre-schools, meeting dignatories, etc. Not in charge of anything (especially armed forces), makes no policy.
So are we all still keen on a presidential republic for Australia?
The only power: to sack a government and bring on a double-dissolution election. The president loses the job when that occurs, and can never be re-appointed.
Interesting article:
Want to Know if the Election was Hacked? Look at the Ballots
It would make sense for the president elect to demand such an investigation, to stop the spread of evil conspiracy theories.
Unless he knows the election was hacked of course.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Interesting article:Want to Know if the Election was Hacked? Look at the Ballots
It would make sense for the president elect to demand such an investigation, to stop the spread of evil conspiracy theories.
Unless he knows the election was hacked of course.
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Interesting article:Want to Know if the Election was Hacked? Look at the Ballots
It would make sense for the president elect to demand such an investigation, to stop the spread of evil conspiracy theories.
Unless he knows the election was hacked of course.
A rerun would be a waste of money & would probably prove nothing.
Agreed, as I’m sure does the author of the article. That’s why he suggested using the paper votes (where they exist) for the purpose that they were intended for, as a reliable check against corruption of the electronic count.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Interesting article:Want to Know if the Election was Hacked? Look at the Ballots
It would make sense for the president elect to demand such an investigation, to stop the spread of evil conspiracy theories.
Unless he knows the election was hacked of course.
Why would Trump care about conspiracy theories? He won.
Does make you wonder though given his propensity to cheat at buisness, golf…
And what about third party actors?
If Hillary had the popular vote and had the establishment behind her
whats with the establishment and the College electoral votes?
Ian said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
Interesting article:Want to Know if the Election was Hacked? Look at the Ballots
It would make sense for the president elect to demand such an investigation, to stop the spread of evil conspiracy theories.
Unless he knows the election was hacked of course.
Why would Trump care about conspiracy theories? He won.
I expect he doesn’t, but if he was sensible he would. It would give him ammunition to throw at opponents.
Ian said:
Does make you wonder though given his propensity to cheat at buisness, golf…And what about third party actors?
Quite possible that either or both sides could have third party groups working for them without their knowledge.
Or perhaps a nod and a wink, and don’t tell me the details.
CrazyNeutrino said:
If Hillary had the popular vote and had the establishment behind herwhats with the establishment and the College electoral votes?
what exactly is your question?
diddly-squat said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
If Hillary had the popular vote and had the establishment behind herwhats with the establishment and the College electoral votes?
what exactly is your question?
I’m guessing the question is, if she has the popular vote and the establishment support (and assuming the electoral colleges are establishment), why doesn’t the electoral college vote just go for Hillary?
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
If Hillary had the popular vote and had the establishment behind herwhats with the establishment and the College electoral votes?
what exactly is your question?
I’m guessing the question is, if she has the popular vote and the establishment support (and assuming the electoral colleges are establishment), why doesn’t the electoral college vote just go for Hillary?
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:what exactly is your question?
I’m guessing the question is, if she has the popular vote and the establishment support (and assuming the electoral colleges are establishment), why doesn’t the electoral college vote just go for Hillary?
I think the candidates prearrange the EC votes beforehand.
In what sense?
In the US when presidents change you get a whole new administration.
In Commonwealth countries when Priministers change Sir Humphrey Appleby continues to run the country.
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
If Hillary had the popular vote and had the establishment behind herwhats with the establishment and the College electoral votes?
what exactly is your question?
I’m guessing the question is, if she has the popular vote and the establishment support (and assuming the electoral colleges are establishment), why doesn’t the electoral college vote just go for Hillary?
well obviously the Electors can, but that would be very unconventional
dv said:
Tamb said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I’m guessing the question is, if she has the popular vote and the establishment support (and assuming the electoral colleges are establishment), why doesn’t the electoral college vote just go for Hillary?
I think the candidates prearrange the EC votes beforehand.In what sense?
Peak Warming Man said:
In the US when presidents change you get a whole new administration.
In Commonwealth countries when Priministers change Sir Humphrey Appleby continues to run the country.
many of the people in senior bureaucratic positions change along with a change in government…
Tamb said:
dv said:
Tamb said:I think the candidates prearrange the EC votes beforehand.
In what sense?
They contact the EC Electors & get their commitment to vote for them.
In the election TV coverage the State’s status showed how many EC votes went to each candidate. Or something like that.
:/
ummm no…
diddly-squat said:
Tamb said:
dv said:In what sense?
They contact the EC Electors & get their commitment to vote for them.
In the election TV coverage the State’s status showed how many EC votes went to each candidate. Or something like that.:/
ummm no…
The Rev Dodgson said:
diddly-squat said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
If Hillary had the popular vote and had the establishment behind herwhats with the establishment and the College electoral votes?
what exactly is your question?
I’m guessing the question is, if she has the popular vote and the establishment support (and assuming the electoral colleges are establishment), why doesn’t the electoral college vote just go for Hillary?
Yes thats the question
Tamb said:
dv said:
Tamb said:I think the candidates prearrange the EC votes beforehand.
In what sense?
They contact the EC Electors & get their commitment to vote for them.
In the election TV coverage the State’s status showed how many EC votes went to each candidate. Or something like that.
That’s based on the statewide vote. Not any kind of personal commitment.
There have, in US history, been over 100 cases of electors going against the statewide vote but Hillary needs about 40 of them to turn and basically it is not likely.
dv said:
Tamb said:
dv said:In what sense?
They contact the EC Electors & get their commitment to vote for them.
In the election TV coverage the State’s status showed how many EC votes went to each candidate. Or something like that.That’s based on the statewide vote. Not any kind of personal commitment.
There have, in US history, been over 100 cases of electors going against the statewide vote but Hillary needs about 40 of them to turn and basically it is not likely.
Tamb said:
dv said:
Tamb said:They contact the EC Electors & get their commitment to vote for them.
In the election TV coverage the State’s status showed how many EC votes went to each candidate. Or something like that.That’s based on the statewide vote. Not any kind of personal commitment.
There have, in US history, been over 100 cases of electors going against the statewide vote but Hillary needs about 40 of them to turn and basically it is not likely.
This is where I was reading the EC votes per State.
The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. A state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two state Senators
Correct.
They vote in accordance with the statewide vote.
Tamb said:
diddly-squat said:
Tamb said:They contact the EC Electors & get their commitment to vote for them.
In the election TV coverage the State’s status showed how many EC votes went to each candidate. Or something like that.:/
ummm no…
Then what is correct ?
each state has a set number of ‘Electoral Collage votes’
each person casts a vote and that vote us used (on a first pass the post basis) to determine who wins the electoral collage votes of the state.
in most states if you win a majority of the FPTP votes then you win all of the state’s Electoral Collage votes
dv said:
Tamb said:
dv said:That’s based on the statewide vote. Not any kind of personal commitment.
There have, in US history, been over 100 cases of electors going against the statewide vote but Hillary needs about 40 of them to turn and basically it is not likely.
This is where I was reading the EC votes per State.
The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. A state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two state SenatorsCorrect.
They vote in accordance with the statewide vote.
dv said:
Tamb said:
dv said:That’s based on the statewide vote. Not any kind of personal commitment.
There have, in US history, been over 100 cases of electors going against the statewide vote but Hillary needs about 40 of them to turn and basically it is not likely.
This is where I was reading the EC votes per State.
The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. A state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two state SenatorsCorrect.
They vote in accordance with the statewide vote.
well they typically vote in accordance with the votes of their state but there is nothing in the Constitution that suggests they have to.
Tamb said:
dv said:
Tamb said:This is where I was reading the EC votes per State.
The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. A state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two state SenatorsCorrect.
They vote in accordance with the statewide vote.
Can they vote contrary to that vote?
Divine Angel said:
Tamb said:
dv said:Correct.
They vote in accordance with the statewide vote.
Can they vote contrary to that vote?
I believe so; I think that was some of the controversy around the election/re-election of GWB.
Tamb said:
dv said:
Tamb said:This is where I was reading the EC votes per State.
The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. A state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two state SenatorsCorrect.
They vote in accordance with the statewide vote.
Can they vote contrary to that vote?
They can, and as I mentioned before there have been over 100 incidents of this in US history.
There was one such “ faithless elector” in 2004, and one in 2000, one in 1988. It happens.
I wouldn’t fall off my chair if there were one or two faithless electors this time. But Hillary needs dozens.
Not sure it’s the most academic source, but:
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-pol-electoral-college-2016-story.html
diddly-squat said:
dv said:
Tamb said:This is where I was reading the EC votes per State.
The Electoral College consists of 538 electors. A majority of 270 electoral votes is required to elect the President. A state’s entitled allotment of electors equals the number of members in its Congressional delegation: one for each member in the House of Representatives plus two state SenatorsCorrect.
They vote in accordance with the statewide vote.
well they typically vote in accordance with the votes of their state but there is nothing in the Constitution that suggests they have to.
Some states such as Washington have made it illegal to break the faith but the penalty is a fine of a few thousand dollars.
I don’t think this election is going to be turned by faithless electors.
But one day an election will be. Given how contntious the 2000 election was, it is remarkable that there were not a couple of electors who flipped from Bush to Gore (Bush won 271 ecv, the number needed is 270.)
They really need to fix that.
Castro’s death has certainly tossed up some wonderful examples of just how much the left side of western politics is losing the plot and making themselves irrelevant, and so allowing people like Donald Trump to win elections.
Look at Trudeau’s comments on Fidel Castro. What kind of mealy-mouthed double-think is required for someone to say stuff like this? Trudeau is the poster boy for all that is currently wrong with leftist politics and this demonstrates it clearly. Look what he said:
“It is with deep sorrow that I learned today of the death of Cuba’s longest serving President.
“Fidel Castro was a larger than life leader who served his people for almost half a century. A legendary revolutionary and orator, Mr. Castro made significant improvements to the education and healthcare of his island nation.
“While a controversial figure, both Mr. Castro’s supporters and detractors recognized his tremendous dedication and love for the Cuban people who had a deep and lasting affection for “el Comandante”.
“I know my father was very proud to call him a friend and I had the opportunity to meet Fidel when my father passed away. It was also a real honour to meet his three sons and his brother President Raúl Castro during my recent visit to Cuba.
“On behalf of all Canadians, Sophie and I offer our deepest condolences to the family, friends and many, many supporters of Mr. Castro. We join the people of Cuba today in mourning the loss of this remarkable leader.”
Now compare this to what Trump said about Castro:
“Today, the world marks the passing of a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people for nearly six decades. Fidel Castro’s legacy is one of firing squads, theft, unimaginable suffering, poverty and the denial of fundamental human rights.
“Though the tragedies, deaths and pain caused by Fidel Castro cannot be erased, our administration will do all it can to ensure the Cuban people can finally begin their journey toward prosperity and liberty.
“While Cuba remains a totalitarian island, it is my hope that today marks a move away from the horrors endured for too long, and toward a future in which the wonderful Cuban people finally live in the freedom they so richly deserve.”
This is why Trump won. This is why Western democracies are shifting towards right wing politics. The Left is in the process of completely divorcing itself from reality via a pernicious ideology which has already made huge inroads not only in to Western politics, but in to Western media, Western academia and any other pillar of society it can get it’s ugly hands on. If you are of the left, as I am, and interested in the politics that runs your life you should be utterly disgusted by Trudeau’s comments, and you should be telling all your other Leftist friends that you are disgusted. Rescuing the left from itself will have to start with the people who do actually value things like Truth, Liberty and Justice, because you can bet your arse Hillary Clinton and her ilk aren’t going to do it for you.
esselte said:
Castro’s death has certainly tossed up some wonderful examples of just how much the left side of western politics is losing the plot and making themselves irrelevant, and so allowing people like Donald Trump to win elections.
Look at Trudeau’s comments on Fidel Castro. What kind of mealy-mouthed double-think is required for someone to say stuff like this? Trudeau is the poster boy for all that is currently wrong with leftist politics and this demonstrates it clearly. Look what he said:
“It is with deep sorrow that I learned today of the death of Cuba’s longest serving President.
“Fidel Castro was a larger than life leader who served his people for almost half a century. A legendary revolutionary and orator, Mr. Castro made significant improvements to the education and healthcare of his island nation.
“While a controversial figure, both Mr. Castro’s supporters and detractors recognized his tremendous dedication and love for the Cuban people who had a deep and lasting affection for “el Comandante”.
“I know my father was very proud to call him a friend and I had the opportunity to meet Fidel when my father passed away. It was also a real honour to meet his three sons and his brother President Raúl Castro during my recent visit to Cuba.
“On behalf of all Canadians, Sophie and I offer our deepest condolences to the family, friends and many, many supporters of Mr. Castro. We join the people of Cuba today in mourning the loss of this remarkable leader.”
Now compare this to what Trump said about Castro:
“Today, the world marks the passing of a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people for nearly six decades. Fidel Castro’s legacy is one of firing squads, theft, unimaginable suffering, poverty and the denial of fundamental human rights.
“Though the tragedies, deaths and pain caused by Fidel Castro cannot be erased, our administration will do all it can to ensure the Cuban people can finally begin their journey toward prosperity and liberty.
“While Cuba remains a totalitarian island, it is my hope that today marks a move away from the horrors endured for too long, and toward a future in which the wonderful Cuban people finally live in the freedom they so richly deserve.”
This is why Trump won. This is why Western democracies are shifting towards right wing politics. The Left is in the process of completely divorcing itself from reality via a pernicious ideology which has already made huge inroads not only in to Western politics, but in to Western media, Western academia and any other pillar of society it can get it’s ugly hands on. If you are of the left, as I am, and interested in the politics that runs your life you should be utterly disgusted by Trudeau’s comments, and you should be telling all your other Leftist friends that you are disgusted. Rescuing the left from itself will have to start with the people who do actually value things like Truth, Liberty and Justice, because you can bet your arse Hillary Clinton and her ilk aren’t going to do it for you.
But Trudeau’s comments on Fidel Castro are correct. The CIA and the people who were thrown out of Cuba have tried to kill him on many occasions and continue to do so upon his death. When Castro took control of Cuba 40% of the land and 60% of the trade was in American control. The casinos were run by the mafia and the local people in their own country were totally dominated and counted for nothing. Cuba at that time was an American satellite and holiday destination for the rich, needless to say it was riddled with crime and corruption.
Castro confiscated the land and property and kicked these people out, which did not endear him to the USA, especially as he was left wing, and fought for the ordinary people. He later embraced soviet Russia when America imposed trade sanctions and did everything it could to destroy Cuba, including invasion and assassination attempts. Castro provided a far better education and community heath system. But possibly the most beneficial was to overthrow the military dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista, who was the typical right wing dictator, who exploited the people and disappeared many. Castro provided a stable and SAFE environment, when other countries in the region with the help of America, were plagued by serious crime, war, drugs and severe hardship.
There were hard times in Cuba too, largely the result of the American blockade and their extremely hostile attitude. So if you want to believe what Trump said, which is no more than ex-Cuban political propaganda combined with the American/CIA rubbish, then do so, but don’t demonise a man who not only tried, but succeeded in helping his people and was held in very high regard by them.
PermeateFree said:
esselte said:Castro’s death has certainly tossed up some wonderful examples of just how much the left side of western politics is losing the plot and making themselves irrelevant, and so allowing people like Donald Trump to win elections.
Look at Trudeau’s comments on Fidel Castro. What kind of mealy-mouthed double-think is required for someone to say stuff like this? Trudeau is the poster boy for all that is currently wrong with leftist politics and this demonstrates it clearly. Look what he said:
“It is with deep sorrow that I learned today of the death of Cuba’s longest serving President.
“Fidel Castro was a larger than life leader who served his people for almost half a century. A legendary revolutionary and orator, Mr. Castro made significant improvements to the education and healthcare of his island nation.
“While a controversial figure, both Mr. Castro’s supporters and detractors recognized his tremendous dedication and love for the Cuban people who had a deep and lasting affection for “el Comandante”.
“I know my father was very proud to call him a friend and I had the opportunity to meet Fidel when my father passed away. It was also a real honour to meet his three sons and his brother President Raúl Castro during my recent visit to Cuba.
“On behalf of all Canadians, Sophie and I offer our deepest condolences to the family, friends and many, many supporters of Mr. Castro. We join the people of Cuba today in mourning the loss of this remarkable leader.”
Now compare this to what Trump said about Castro:
“Today, the world marks the passing of a brutal dictator who oppressed his own people for nearly six decades. Fidel Castro’s legacy is one of firing squads, theft, unimaginable suffering, poverty and the denial of fundamental human rights.
“Though the tragedies, deaths and pain caused by Fidel Castro cannot be erased, our administration will do all it can to ensure the Cuban people can finally begin their journey toward prosperity and liberty.
“While Cuba remains a totalitarian island, it is my hope that today marks a move away from the horrors endured for too long, and toward a future in which the wonderful Cuban people finally live in the freedom they so richly deserve.”
This is why Trump won. This is why Western democracies are shifting towards right wing politics. The Left is in the process of completely divorcing itself from reality via a pernicious ideology which has already made huge inroads not only in to Western politics, but in to Western media, Western academia and any other pillar of society it can get it’s ugly hands on. If you are of the left, as I am, and interested in the politics that runs your life you should be utterly disgusted by Trudeau’s comments, and you should be telling all your other Leftist friends that you are disgusted. Rescuing the left from itself will have to start with the people who do actually value things like Truth, Liberty and Justice, because you can bet your arse Hillary Clinton and her ilk aren’t going to do it for you.
But Trudeau’s comments on Fidel Castro are correct. The CIA and the people who were thrown out of Cuba have tried to kill him on many occasions and continue to do so upon his death. When Castro took control of Cuba 40% of the land and 60% of the trade was in American control. The casinos were run by the mafia and the local people in their own country were totally dominated and counted for nothing. Cuba at that time was an American satellite and holiday destination for the rich, needless to say it was riddled with crime and corruption.
Castro confiscated the land and property and kicked these people out, which did not endear him to the USA, especially as he was left wing, and fought for the ordinary people. He later embraced soviet Russia when America imposed trade sanctions and did everything it could to destroy Cuba, including invasion and assassination attempts. Castro provided a far better education and community heath system. But possibly the most beneficial was to overthrow the military dictatorship of Fulgencio Batista, who was the typical right wing dictator, who exploited the people and disappeared many. Castro provided a stable and SAFE environment, when other countries in the region with the help of America, were plagued by serious crime, war, drugs and severe hardship.
There were hard times in Cuba too, largely the result of the American blockade and their extremely hostile attitude. So if you want to believe what Trump said, which is no more than ex-Cuban political propaganda combined with the American/CIA rubbish, then do so, but don’t demonise a man who not only tried, but succeeded in helping his people and was held in very high regard by them.
I think in some ways Cuba was better after Castro’s takeover
America certainly didn’t like him when he sided with Russia
I like the old Cuban Cars, they kind of became a tourist attraction
http://www.theage.com.au/world/us-election/electoral-college-pitfalls-on-full-display-as-donald-trump-disparages-recount-effort-20161129-gszqp0.html
The election of a president who a) is 70 years old and b) seems to be a bit crackers has renewed interest in the 25th amendment, which lays out circumstances in which the president can be replaced involuntarily due to “inability”.
http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4692&context=flr
I did not know that Cleveland had his jaw removed during his time in office, and successfully covered it up. So much to learn.
Trump’s Presidency Will Be a Disaster for Public Education
Trump is already showing which direction he’s taking the country’s public education. If you care about kids being taught science, you’d best gird yourself for a war, because we’re going to have to fight to preserve our children’s right to a strong STEM education.
To begin with, Trump’s Vice President, to whom he plans to delegate most of the actual presidential work, is an evolution-denying Christian extremist who wants creationism taught in public schools. He’s also brought all his political power to bear on overturning the will of Indiana voters while he pushes for expansions of school vouchers and charter schools.
More…
That’s a bit unfair. There are a lot of industries which won’t fare well under a Trumpidency.
Muslim woman attacked by men shouting Donald Trump’s name on NYC subway: police
Trump on his way to being Hitler?
CrazyNeutrino said:
Muslim woman attacked by men shouting Donald Trump’s name on NYC subway: policeTrump on his way to being Hitler?
I hate Trump as much as anybody, but as far as I recall he hasn’t actually suggested that it is a good idea for men to attack muslim women on the subway.
The Rev Dodgson said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Muslim woman attacked by men shouting Donald Trump’s name on NYC subway: policeTrump on his way to being Hitler?
I hate Trump as much as anybody, but as far as I recall he hasn’t actually suggested that it is a good idea for men to attack muslim women on the subway.
The Rev Dodgson said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Muslim woman attacked by men shouting Donald Trump’s name on NYC subway: policeTrump on his way to being Hitler?
I hate Trump as much as anybody, but as far as I recall he hasn’t actually suggested that it is a good idea for men to attack muslim women on the subway.
Imagine gangs in early Nazi Germany, drunk people going around yelling Hitler and targeted Jews and Gays etc
Looks almost the same to me
Drunk people going around yelling Trump and targeting Muslims
CrazyNeutrino said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
Muslim woman attacked by men shouting Donald Trump’s name on NYC subway: policeTrump on his way to being Hitler?
I hate Trump as much as anybody, but as far as I recall he hasn’t actually suggested that it is a good idea for men to attack muslim women on the subway.
Imagine gangs in early Nazi Germany, drunk people going around yelling Hitler and targeted Jews and Gays etc
Looks almost the same to me
Drunk people going around yelling Trump and targeting Muslims
Does being intoxicated give them vigilante license or something?
CrazyNeutrino said:
CrazyNeutrino said:
The Rev Dodgson said:I hate Trump as much as anybody, but as far as I recall he hasn’t actually suggested that it is a good idea for men to attack muslim women on the subway.
Imagine gangs in early Nazi Germany, drunk people going around yelling Hitler and targeted Jews and Gays etc
Looks almost the same to me
Drunk people going around yelling Trump and targeting Muslims
Does being intoxicated give them vigilante license or something?

The poorest place in America with a non-Hispanic white majority, Clay County in Kentucky, voted 87% for Trump.
I listened to the BBC discuss how everybody got the US election wrong and they mentioned that only 10% of people respond to pollsters.
So this got PWM thinking.
If 15% of lefties respond and only 5% of righties respond or visa versa you’ve got a rogered poll.
I’ve only been polled twice and both times I told them to get rogered and burnt.
No one seemed to go down that track.
A Woman Just Stood Up To Trump’s Latest Outburst On Twitter – And America Is Cheering Her On
Donald Trump didn’t like Saturday Night Live last night very much.
During the show he tweeted out the following response, saying that the show was completely “unwatchable” and “not funny.”
When, in fact, it was actually very funny – and got a lot of fanfare for making fun of Donald Trump’s tweets, no less! Pretty ironic that he angrily tweeted about a show making fun of his tweets!
More…