Date: 13/11/2016 17:45:47
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 980571
Subject: Fractal Antennas

Might have a go at making a tv antenna using a fractal design

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=fractal+antennas

https://www.google.com.au/search?q=fractal+antenna&client=firefox-b&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_antenna

http://www.leevalley.com/US/wood/page.aspx?cat=3,43597&p=71364

http://ag1le.blogspot.com.au/2011/12/antenna-experiments-fractal-quad-for-28.html

http://www.antenna-theory.com/antennas/fractal.php

http://www.dxzone.com/how-to-make-fractal-antennas/

Reply Quote

Date: 13/11/2016 17:51:56
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 980573
Subject: re: Fractal Antennas

Types of antennas.
Dipole, loop, spiral, fractal.

Dipole and variants is the standard.
Loop is better at low frequencies.
Spiral has a wider frequency range.

So, what’s the advantage of fractal?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/11/2016 18:16:06
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 980580
Subject: re: Fractal Antennas

mollwollfumble said:


Types of antennas.
Dipole, loop, spiral, fractal.

Dipole and variants is the standard.
Loop is better at low frequencies.
Spiral has a wider frequency range.

So, what’s the advantage of fractal?

Designs can be made to be smaller, flat and Multi band

Fractal antennas can be found in mobile phones tables and those flat caravan TV antennas

——-

Fractal antennas have been found to be approximately 20% more efficient than normal antennas.
http://www.instructables.com/id/How-to-make-a-fractal-antenna-for-HDTV-DTV-plus-/

——-

Fractal antennas are aerials whose design is based on the fractal geometric shape, typically generated by computer programs, feature a compact size, wideband and good performances.
These antennas are usually flat and are used mainly in very high frequencies, therefore are ideal for use in mobile, military and security applications.
http://www.dxzone.com/how-to-make-fractal-antennas/

——-

A fractal antenna is an antenna that uses a fractal, self-similar design to maximize the length, or increase the perimeter (on inside sections or the outer structure), of material that can receive or transmit electromagnetic radiation within a given total surface area or volume.

Such fractal antennas are also referred to as multilevel and space filling curves, but the key aspect lies in their repetition of a motif over two or more scale sizes, or “iterations”. For this reason, fractal antennas are very compact, multiband or wideband, and have useful applications in cellular telephone and microwave communications.
An example of a fractal antenna: a space-filling curve called a Minkowski Island fractal

A good example of a fractal antenna as a spacefilling curve is in the form of a shrunken fractal helix. Here, each line of copper is just a small fraction of a wavelength.

A fractal antenna’s response differs markedly from traditional antenna designs, in that it is capable of operating with good-to-excellent performance at many different frequencies simultaneously. Normally standard antennas have to be “cut” for the frequency for which they are to be used—and thus the standard antennas only work well at that frequency.

This makes the fractal antenna an excellent design for wideband and multiband applications. In addition the fractal nature of the antenna shrinks its size, without the use of any components, such as inductors or capacitors.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractal_antenna

Small enough that you 3D print or flat print them

Reply Quote

Date: 13/11/2016 18:18:23
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 980581
Subject: re: Fractal Antennas

An etched design

https://orderinchoas.wordpress.com/2013/02/02/clouds-are-not-spheres-a-brief-history-of-fractals/

Fractals Today 

In the early 1990s, fractal antennas were introduced. One of the very first of these was in the shape of the infamous “Koch snowflake.” It worked extremely well and had the advantage of being far smaller than a normal antenna with a greater surface area, leaving the antenna able to receive a greater number of frequencies.

 Mobile phone companies were also having similar issues at this time: every single portion of the phone ran at a different frequency. However the introduction of the fractal antenna enabled companies to all these frequencies to run on one single phone, thus kick starting and enabling the mobile phone revolution that continues today.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/11/2016 18:29:39
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 980585
Subject: re: Fractal Antennas

Inkject-Printed Antenna Gathers Ambient Energy from TV Transmissions

How to Print a Fractal Antenna with Bare Conductive Electric Paint

Youtube Video on Fractal Antennas
Fractal Metamaterial Antenna Monopole Demonstration

Reply Quote

Date: 13/11/2016 18:47:40
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 980586
Subject: re: Fractal Antennas

more videos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQorXhKbZss

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqPimTbe5Is

Reply Quote

Date: 13/11/2016 19:24:13
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 980623
Subject: re: Fractal Antennas

Books on Fractal Antennas

Fractal RFID Antenna Miniaturization

Design And Simulation Of Fractal Antenna For Wlan

Reply Quote

Date: 14/11/2016 01:05:39
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 980716
Subject: re: Fractal Antennas

CrazyNeutrino said:

more videos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQorXhKbZss

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqPimTbe5Is

The second video explains how to build an easy version

another option is to use a piece of perspex or acrylic and use thin copper tape for the antenna array
use glue or place another piece of perspex on top to hold the antenna array in place

Reply Quote

Date: 15/11/2016 04:50:29
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 981306
Subject: re: Fractal Antennas

CrazyNeutrino said:


Designs can be made to be smaller, flat and Multi band

Multiband, yes, but not nearly as wideband as a spiral antenna. A spiral antenna typically has a flat frequency response over a frequency range that covers a factor of 30 for an average spiral, 80 for some spirals. A fractal antenna is struggling to get a frequency range that covers a factor of 10.

In addition, a fractal antenna has a frequency response that is far from uniform. It has to be designed for a specific lowest frequency F and second frequency n*F. That also makes it sensitive to n^2 F, n^3 F etc. Further, there may only be a few acceptable values for n. n=3 is the easiest to design, n=2 is possible, and I think that n=sqrt(3) may also be possible.

Come to think of it. If a half wave dipole antenna is designed for frequency F then it will automatically be sensitive to frequencies 3*F, 5*F, 7*F, 9*F etc. So there’s no huge advantage in fractal. “Approximately 20% more efficient than normal antennas”, that sounds to be in about the right ballpark.

This is a reflection loss curve for a fractal antenna from the web. This is far from being a flat frequency response. It is designed for F = 5.3 GHz. The second design frequency is 11.1 GHz, so n is slightly larger than 2.

Reply Quote