Date: 27/11/2016 17:10:23
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 987765
Subject: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
Watching the series ‘The Expanse’ a spacecraft’s hatch was knocked open and the pressurised atmosphere was escaping. I thought it took an inordinately long time to decompress the spacecraft.
Accordingly I was hoping for some rough idea of exactly how quickly it would happen. If we think of a volume of 10m^3 how quickly would decompression happen given a 1m^2 hole?
Date: 27/11/2016 17:14:15
From: Michael V
ID: 987768
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
Date: 27/11/2016 17:23:50
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 987770
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
Date: 27/11/2016 17:40:06
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 987776
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
Witty Rejoinder said:
Watching the series ‘The Expanse’ a spacecraft’s hatch was knocked open and the pressurised atmosphere was escaping. I thought it took an inordinately long time to decompress the spacecraft.
Accordingly I was hoping for some rough idea of exactly how quickly it would happen. If we think of a volume of 10m^3 how quickly would decompression happen given a 1m^2 hole?
I can calculate that. In the meantime, I’m sure that either the 10 m^3 or the 1 m^2 is unrealistic.
Date: 27/11/2016 17:43:53
From: dv
ID: 987779
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
mollwollfumble said:
Witty Rejoinder said:
Watching the series ‘The Expanse’ a spacecraft’s hatch was knocked open and the pressurised atmosphere was escaping. I thought it took an inordinately long time to decompress the spacecraft.
Accordingly I was hoping for some rough idea of exactly how quickly it would happen. If we think of a volume of 10m^3 how quickly would decompression happen given a 1m^2 hole?
I can calculate that. In the meantime, I’m sure that either the 10 m^3 or the 1 m^2 is unrealistic.
Well what craft is it? Shenzhou has an internal volume of 8 cu metres and the hatch is a little under a square metre.
Date: 27/11/2016 17:52:57
From: dv
ID: 987783
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
Using Fleigner’s formula
t= 0.44 * V/(A * T^0.5) * ( ( p1/p2)^(1/7)-1)
p1 initial pressure
p2 final pressure
A area of hole
V volume
T initial temperature
t time
Date: 27/11/2016 17:56:26
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 987784
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
dv said:
Using Fleigner’s formula
t= 0.44 * V/(A * T^0.5) * ( ( p1/p2)^(1/7)-1)
p1 initial pressure
p2 final pressure
A area of hole
V volume
T initial temperature
t time
Yes, but don’t take p2 = 0. Use something more realistic like p1 / p2 = 10 or p1 / p2 = 50.
Date: 27/11/2016 18:01:28
From: dv
ID: 987790
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
dv said:
Using Fleigner’s formula
t= 0.44 * V/(A * T^0.5) * ( ( p1/p2)^(1/7)-1)
p1 initial pressure
p2 final pressure
A area of hole in metres squared
V volume in metres cubed
T initial temperature in K
t time in seconds
So it will theoretically take forever to completely lose all gas but let us say we want the time until pressure is reduced by 99%.
Take A=1 square metres, V=10 cubic metres, T = 298 K
So I get 0.238 seconds.
This gels with my expectations. The air is going to shoot out of there at something like the speed of air molecules, which is like over 1000 km/h…
Date: 27/11/2016 18:03:04
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 987793
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
dv said:
So it will theoretically take forever to completely lose all gas but let us say we want the time until pressure is reduced by 99%.
Take A=1 square metres, V=10 cubic metres, T = 298 K
So I get 0.238 seconds.
This gels with my expectations. The air is going to shoot out of there at something like the speed of air molecules, which is like over 1000 km/h…
Thanks. So it seems that this scenario on the tv show was very unrealistic.
Date: 27/11/2016 18:35:15
From: dv
ID: 987796
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
Date: 27/11/2016 18:36:17
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 987797
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
dv said:
Which episode was that?
1st I think.
Date: 27/11/2016 18:38:32
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 987798
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
Witty Rejoinder said:
dv said:
Which episode was that?
1st I think.
Just checked wikipedia. It was the 2nd episode.
Date: 27/11/2016 18:41:07
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 987799
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
dv said:
The air is going to shoot out of there at something like the speed of air molecules
Air does tend to do that.
Date: 27/11/2016 22:10:13
From: dv
ID: 987855
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
Having watched the ep, I would estimate the interior colume of the shuttle to be between 50 and 100 cubic metres and the hatch to be maybe 3 sq metres. It took 45 seconds for them to seal the hwtch.
But the thing is, the problem was that debris had breach the exterior doors of the airlock. Even with the hatch open, the limiting factor is going to be size of that puncture, which is not shown in detail.
Date: 27/11/2016 22:17:05
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 987859
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
dv said:
But the thing is, the problem was that debris had breach the exterior doors of the airlock. Even with the hatch open, the limiting factor is going to be size of that puncture, which is not shown in detail.
Okay. It was a little more complex than I thought then. Thanks.
Date: 28/11/2016 15:43:35
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 988131
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
dv said:
Having watched the ep, I would estimate the interior colume of the shuttle to be between 50 and 100 cubic metres and the hatch to be maybe 3 sq metres. It took 45 seconds for them to seal the hwtch.
But the thing is, the problem was that debris had breach the exterior doors of the airlock. Even with the hatch open, the limiting factor is going to be size of that puncture, which is not shown in detail.
So, now calculate the size of the puncture from the spacecraft volume and time to decompress.
Date: 28/11/2016 16:28:53
From: dv
ID: 988154
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
mollwollfumble said:
dv said:
Having watched the ep, I would estimate the interior colume of the shuttle to be between 50 and 100 cubic metres and the hatch to be maybe 3 sq metres. It took 45 seconds for them to seal the hwtch.
But the thing is, the problem was that debris had breach the exterior doors of the airlock. Even with the hatch open, the limiting factor is going to be size of that puncture, which is not shown in detail.
So, now calculate the size of the puncture from the spacecraft volume and time to decompress.
Well now, I don’t know what the final to initial pressure ratio is.
I mean people were still able to function without difficulty but I mean people can even hold their breath longer than that. They showed no signs of discomfort so I suppose we could say that the final pressure was unlikely to have been less than a third the initial pressure, but it could, for all we know, be 99% of the initial pressure.
Date: 28/11/2016 16:32:08
From: dv
ID: 988158
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
BTW, looks like a good old hard sci fi show. Very Asimovian: all politics and conventional physics. And you gotta love Shohreh Aghdashloo.
Date: 28/11/2016 16:35:28
From: Cymek
ID: 988164
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
dv said:
BTW, looks like a good old hard sci fi show. Very Asimovian: all politics and conventional physics. And you gotta love Shohreh Aghdashloo.
I liked it, interesting how people suffer from a lack of gravity related and how medicine is either extremely expensive or they are denied access to it.
Date: 6/05/2017 12:37:23
From: dv
ID: 1062029
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
I think I done fucked this up. Stand by for corrections.
Date: 6/05/2017 12:38:08
From: Spiny Norman
ID: 1062030
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
dv said:
I think I done fucked this up. Stand by for corrections.
tap, tap, tap …
Date: 6/05/2017 12:56:06
From: dv
ID: 1062044
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
The pressure’s on, no pun intended
Date: 6/05/2017 14:34:41
From: dv
ID: 1062099
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
Nah … looks like that’s right. False alarm.
Date: 6/05/2017 14:38:01
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1062100
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
dv said:
Nah … looks like that’s right. False alarm.
*NASA breathes sigh of relief *
Date: 6/05/2017 14:40:58
From: dv
ID: 1062102
Subject: re: Explosive decompression of spacecraft?
I was just looking at that 7 and thinking fuck, that’s weird … 7? Is that supposed to be gamma (γ)?
But a bit of rough modelling makes the answers look reasonable.