Date: 5/12/2016 14:24:19
From: Dropbear
ID: 992137
Subject: NZ Economy

I read with interest that the NZ economy is running a tidy little surplus.

Any ideas on how they’re managing to pull this off? Did the rebuilding of Christchurch really give their economy that big a shot in the arm?

What’s their secret?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 14:32:52
From: transition
ID: 992140
Subject: re: NZ Economy

higher GST didn’t ruin them

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:00:20
From: pommiejohn
ID: 992142
Subject: re: NZ Economy

I’ve no idea, but a Kiwi mate of mine who finished his MBA few years ago headed back there from Brissie recently.
His opinion was there’s no political leadership here and all we know how to do is dig dirt out of the ground.

He thought NZ had a much brighter future.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:04:05
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 992144
Subject: re: NZ Economy

pommiejohn said:


I’ve no idea, but a Kiwi mate of mine who finished his MBA few years ago headed back there from Brissie recently.
His opinion was there’s no political leadership here and all we know how to do is dig dirt out of the ground.

He thought NZ had a much brighter future.

Wot? shagging sheep?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:38:52
From: sibeen
ID: 992148
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Dropbear said:


I read with interest that the NZ economy is running a tidy little surplus.

Any ideas on how they’re managing to pull this off? Did the rebuilding of Christchurch really give their economy that big a shot in the arm?

What’s their secret?

From reading the comments over on the Gran about John Keys retirement it apparently had nothing to do with him. By all accounts he is a total flog.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:40:53
From: Bubblecar
ID: 992149
Subject: re: NZ Economy

sibeen said:


Dropbear said:

I read with interest that the NZ economy is running a tidy little surplus.

Any ideas on how they’re managing to pull this off? Did the rebuilding of Christchurch really give their economy that big a shot in the arm?

What’s their secret?

From reading the comments over on the Gran about John Keys retirement it apparently had nothing to do with him. By all accounts he is a total flog.

What does “total flog” mean in this context?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:41:53
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 992151
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Dropbear said:

I read with interest that the NZ economy is running a tidy little surplus.

Any ideas on how they’re managing to pull this off? Did the rebuilding of Christchurch really give their economy that big a shot in the arm?

What’s their secret?

From reading the comments over on the Gran about John Keys retirement it apparently had nothing to do with him. By all accounts he is a total flog.

What does “total flog” mean in this context?

It means more than a partial flog.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:42:05
From: Boris
ID: 992152
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Dropbear said:

I read with interest that the NZ economy is running a tidy little surplus.

Any ideas on how they’re managing to pull this off? Did the rebuilding of Christchurch really give their economy that big a shot in the arm?

What’s their secret?

From reading the comments over on the Gran about John Keys retirement it apparently had nothing to do with him. By all accounts he is a total flog.

What does “total flog” mean in this context?

useless.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:43:05
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 992155
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Dropbear said:

I read with interest that the NZ economy is running a tidy little surplus.

Any ideas on how they’re managing to pull this off? Did the rebuilding of Christchurch really give their economy that big a shot in the arm?

What’s their secret?

From reading the comments over on the Gran about John Keys retirement it apparently had nothing to do with him. By all accounts he is a total flog.

What does “total flog” mean in this context?

It’s the long form of totes flog.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:44:49
From: party_pants
ID: 992156
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Bubblecar said:


sibeen said:

Dropbear said:

I read with interest that the NZ economy is running a tidy little surplus.

Any ideas on how they’re managing to pull this off? Did the rebuilding of Christchurch really give their economy that big a shot in the arm?

What’s their secret?

From reading the comments over on the Gran about John Keys retirement it apparently had nothing to do with him. By all accounts he is a total flog.

What does “total flog” mean in this context?

to flog = to masturbate

A complete wanker in other words. Someone with a vastly overestimated sense of their own greatness.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:49:54
From: Bubblecar
ID: 992158
Subject: re: NZ Economy

party_pants said:


to flog = to masturbate

A complete wanker in other words. Someone with a vastly overestimated sense of their own greatness.

OTOH, I’m sure that plenty of people who masturbate manage to maintain a realistic self-image.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:52:51
From: party_pants
ID: 992159
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Bubblecar said:


party_pants said:

to flog = to masturbate

A complete wanker in other words. Someone with a vastly overestimated sense of their own greatness.

OTOH, I’m sure that plenty of people who masturbate manage to maintain a realistic self-image.

Perhaps I should clarify. Masturbation itself is not the problem if you’re thinking about somebody else, it’s thinking about yourself in order to pleasure yourself that’s the issue.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:53:55
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 992160
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Bubblecar said:


party_pants said:

to flog = to masturbate

A complete wanker in other words. Someone with a vastly overestimated sense of their own greatness.

OTOH, I’m sure that plenty of people who masturbate manage to maintain a realistic self-image.

And people who don’t wank proly don’t know how?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:57:18
From: Bubblecar
ID: 992161
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Here’s the NZ government’s own economy spiel:

…..We’re ranked by the World Bank as the easiest place in the world to start a business (2015) and the world’s second easiest country to do business in generally.

The Heritage Foundation rated New Zealand the world’s third freest economy in its 2015 Index of Economic Freedom, just behind Hong Kong and Singapore.

There are few restrictions on establishing, owning and operating a business here. In fact, by using the government’s online portals the official paperwork to set up a business can be completed in a matter of hours.

New Zealand came in third in Forbes’ ‘Best Country for Business’ report, (December 2014) just behind Denmark and Hong Kong.

Forbes commented that “Over the past 20 years the government has transformed New Zealand from an agrarian economy dependent on concessionary British market access to a more industrialized, free market economy that can compete globally. This dynamic growth has boosted real incomes and broadened and deepened the technological capabilities of the industrial sector.”

…..Like most OECD countries, New Zealand’s economy experienced an economic slow-down following the global financial crisis in September 2008. As in other advanced economies, business and consumer confidence declined. Unlike most OECD countries however, after a 2% decline in 2009, the economy pulled out of recession. It achieved 1.7% growth in 2010, 2% in 2011 and 3% in 2012. That compared with 0.3% growth in the UK and negative 0.9% in the euro area; 0.4% in Japan; 1.1% in Canada; and 1.6% in the USA.

Recovery was led mainly by exports, while relatively strong Government accounts and a well-capitalised banking system provided a stable base for the economy. These positives were supported by the continued boost to GDP from the rebuilding of Christchurch after earthquakes there in 2010 and 2011.

More: https://www.newzealandnow.govt.nz/investing-in-nz/opportunities-outlook/economic-overview

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 15:58:33
From: Divine Angel
ID: 992163
Subject: re: NZ Economy

OK, so easiest place in the world to start a business… how about keeping one going?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 16:02:49
From: Bubblecar
ID: 992166
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Divine Angel said:


OK, so easiest place in the world to start a business… how about keeping one going?

I’d imagine they’re much the same as Oz, with most new businesses failing after a short stab at it.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 16:02:53
From: PermeateFree
ID: 992168
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Bubblecar said:


Here’s the NZ government’s own economy spiel:

…..We’re ranked by the World Bank as the easiest place in the world to start a business (2015) and the world’s second easiest country to do business in generally.

The Heritage Foundation rated New Zealand the world’s third freest economy in its 2015 Index of Economic Freedom, just behind Hong Kong and Singapore.

There are few restrictions on establishing, owning and operating a business here. In fact, by using the government’s online portals the official paperwork to set up a business can be completed in a matter of hours.

New Zealand came in third in Forbes’ ‘Best Country for Business’ report, (December 2014) just behind Denmark and Hong Kong.

Forbes commented that “Over the past 20 years the government has transformed New Zealand from an agrarian economy dependent on concessionary British market access to a more industrialized, free market economy that can compete globally. This dynamic growth has boosted real incomes and broadened and deepened the technological capabilities of the industrial sector.”

…..Like most OECD countries, New Zealand’s economy experienced an economic slow-down following the global financial crisis in September 2008. As in other advanced economies, business and consumer confidence declined. Unlike most OECD countries however, after a 2% decline in 2009, the economy pulled out of recession. It achieved 1.7% growth in 2010, 2% in 2011 and 3% in 2012. That compared with 0.3% growth in the UK and negative 0.9% in the euro area; 0.4% in Japan; 1.1% in Canada; and 1.6% in the USA.

Recovery was led mainly by exports, while relatively strong Government accounts and a well-capitalised banking system provided a stable base for the economy. These positives were supported by the continued boost to GDP from the rebuilding of Christchurch after earthquakes there in 2010 and 2011.

More: https://www.newzealandnow.govt.nz/investing-in-nz/opportunities-outlook/economic-overview

But to the armchair experts, he is still a big wanker. :)

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 16:12:01
From: Bubblecar
ID: 992171
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Might be a good idea for any country wanting to boost GDP. Just destroy one of your cities with a controlled demolition, then rebuild it.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 16:17:34
From: poikilotherm
ID: 992173
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Bubblecar said:


Might be a good idea for any country wanting to boost GDP. Just destroy one of your cities with a controlled demolition, then rebuild it.

No need, just keep letting legal immigrants in while doing while building no infrastructure, GDP looks good.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 16:35:53
From: Ian
ID: 992188
Subject: re: NZ Economy

NZ doesn’t try to scare off tourists with tales of bitey things and dropbears.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 16:38:43
From: Tamb
ID: 992189
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Ian said:


NZ doesn’t try to scare off tourists with tales of bitey things and dropbears.

I’ve faced a NZ Rugby haka. They DON’T NEED dropbears.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 16:39:35
From: furious
ID: 992191
Subject: re: NZ Economy

In NZ, a french tourist ends up in court after having a hissy fit about not being picked up while hitch hiking, or something = good publicity

In Aus, a french tourist gets randomly stabbed and dies = not so good publicity…

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 16:42:22
From: Cymek
ID: 992192
Subject: re: NZ Economy

NZ used to be Australia’s special cousin, now its the reverse

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:00:30
From: diddly-squat
ID: 992194
Subject: re: NZ Economy

They have (or at least used to have when I lived there) a far more efficient tax system

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:01:45
From: sibeen
ID: 992195
Subject: re: NZ Economy

diddly-squat said:

They have (or at least used to have when I lived there) a far more efficient tax system

In what way?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:13:02
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 992196
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Bubblecar said:


Might be a good idea for any country wanting to boost GDP. Just destroy one of your cities with a controlled demolition, then rebuild it.

The Syrians are going to be rich, richer than weather girls.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:16:28
From: Ian
ID: 992198
Subject: re: NZ Economy

sibeen said:


diddly-squat said:

They have (or at least used to have when I lived there) a far more efficient tax system

In what way?

If you drive a car, I’ll tax the street,
If you try to sit, I’ll tax your seat.
If you get too cold I’ll tax the heat,
If you take a walk, I’ll tax your feet.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:23:40
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 992199
Subject: re: NZ Economy

New Zealand went through a major program of tax reform in the 1980s. The top marginal rate of income tax was reduced from 66% to 33% (changed to 39% in April 2000, 38% in April 2009 and 33% on 1 October 2010) and corporate income tax rate from 48% to 33% (changed to 30% in 2008 and to 28% on 1 October 2010). Goods and services tax was introduced, initially at a rate of 10% (then 12.5% and now 15%, as of 1 October 2010).
—————————————————-

One word, tax reform.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:23:52
From: diddly-squat
ID: 992200
Subject: re: NZ Economy

sibeen said:


diddly-squat said:

They have (or at least used to have when I lived there) a far more efficient tax system

In what way?

higher GST and a far simplier income tax system – there were effectively no deductions or subsidies, just PAYE… with no mandatory need to complete a return at the end of the tax year.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:24:53
From: diddly-squat
ID: 992201
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Peak Warming Man said:


New Zealand went through a major program of tax reform in the 1980s. The top marginal rate of income tax was reduced from 66% to 33% (changed to 39% in April 2000, 38% in April 2009 and 33% on 1 October 2010) and corporate income tax rate from 48% to 33% (changed to 30% in 2008 and to 28% on 1 October 2010). Goods and services tax was introduced, initially at a rate of 10% (then 12.5% and now 15%, as of 1 October 2010).
—————————————————-

One word, tax reform.

I’m no tax lawyer, but I think that’s 2 words…

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:25:19
From: poikilotherm
ID: 992202
Subject: re: NZ Economy

diddly-squat said:


sibeen said:

diddly-squat said:

They have (or at least used to have when I lived there) a far more efficient tax system

In what way?

higher GST and a far simplier income tax system – there were effectively no deductions or subsidies, just PAYE… with no mandatory need to complete a return at the end of the tax year.

What does Aus do? Have 5 tax reviews and do nothing with them.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:29:15
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 992203
Subject: re: NZ Economy

poikilotherm said:


diddly-squat said:

sibeen said:

In what way?

higher GST and a far simplier income tax system – there were effectively no deductions or subsidies, just PAYE… with no mandatory need to complete a return at the end of the tax year.

What does Aus do? Have 5 tax reviews and do nothing with them.

And then you’ve got the States and the local councils bickering.
Abolish the states.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:29:59
From: diddly-squat
ID: 992204
Subject: re: NZ Economy

poikilotherm said:


diddly-squat said:

sibeen said:

In what way?

higher GST and a far simplier income tax system – there were effectively no deductions or subsidies, just PAYE… with no mandatory need to complete a return at the end of the tax year.

What does Aus do? Have 5 tax reviews and do nothing with them.

well, we shit the bed… that’s what we do…

we of course also had a change to have an effective MRRT and ETS as well… bot of which have been scrapped…

bet the ScoMo is kicking himself now with the increase in commodity prices….

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:34:22
From: poikilotherm
ID: 992207
Subject: re: NZ Economy

diddly-squat said:


poikilotherm said:

diddly-squat said:

higher GST and a far simplier income tax system – there were effectively no deductions or subsidies, just PAYE… with no mandatory need to complete a return at the end of the tax year.

What does Aus do? Have 5 tax reviews and do nothing with them.

well, we shit the bed… that’s what we do…

we of course also had a change to have an effective MRRT and ETS as well… bot of which have been scrapped…

bet the ScoMo is kicking himself now with the increase in commodity prices….

Then keep sleeping in it.

Idiots.

The douche bags have gone after the LNG white elephants…no profits to be had there, dickheads.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 17:34:55
From: dv
ID: 992209
Subject: re: NZ Economy

It turned around pretty quickly too.

I don’t know the fundamental cause.

But still … Having a comprehensive Emissions Trading Scheme doesn’t seem to have slowed them down.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 18:02:07
From: diddly-squat
ID: 992219
Subject: re: NZ Economy

in fairness though… I do believe that their social security program isn’t anything to write home about…

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 18:37:57
From: Dropbear
ID: 992237
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Peak Warming Man said:


New Zealand went through a major program of tax reform in the 1980s. The top marginal rate of income tax was reduced from 66% to 33% (changed to 39% in April 2000, 38% in April 2009 and 33% on 1 October 2010) and corporate income tax rate from 48% to 33% (changed to 30% in 2008 and to 28% on 1 October 2010). Goods and services tax was introduced, initially at a rate of 10% (then 12.5% and now 15%, as of 1 October 2010).
—————————————————-

One word, tax reform.

Two words

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 18:39:11
From: Dropbear
ID: 992239
Subject: re: NZ Economy

dv said:


It turned around pretty quickly too.

I don’t know the fundamental cause.

But still … Having a comprehensive Emissions Trading Scheme doesn’t seem to have slowed them down.

No heavy industry, they don’t GAF about emissions

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 20:01:28
From: poikilotherm
ID: 992278
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Dropbear said:


dv said:

It turned around pretty quickly too.

I don’t know the fundamental cause.

But still … Having a comprehensive Emissions Trading Scheme doesn’t seem to have slowed them down.

No heavy industry, they don’t GAF about emissions

“ Large scale manufacturing industries include aluminum production, food processing, metal fabrication, wood and paper products. Mining, manufacturing, electricity, gas, water, and waste services accounted for 16.5% of GDP in 2013”

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 20:11:19
From: diddly-squat
ID: 992280
Subject: re: NZ Economy

poikilotherm said:


Dropbear said:

dv said:

It turned around pretty quickly too.

I don’t know the fundamental cause.

But still … Having a comprehensive Emissions Trading Scheme doesn’t seem to have slowed them down.

No heavy industry, they don’t GAF about emissions

“ Large scale manufacturing industries include aluminum production, food processing, metal fabrication, wood and paper products. Mining, manufacturing, electricity, gas, water, and waste services accounted for 16.5% of GDP in 2013”

16.5% is hardly a large slice of the pie for all of that…

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 20:43:56
From: Dropbear
ID: 992288
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Aluminium production sounds thirsty.. The others, meh

Reply Quote

Date: 5/12/2016 20:47:01
From: sibeen
ID: 992290
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Dropbear said:


Aluminium production sounds thirsty.. The others, meh

I’m surprised there is aluminium production in NZ.

This weeks fuckup by Ausnet may mean the end of smeltering in Oz. If so it will screw the town of Portland right over.

Reply Quote

Date: 8/12/2016 00:17:39
From: wookiemeister
ID: 993367
Subject: re: NZ Economy

Peak Warming Man said:


poikilotherm said:

diddly-squat said:

higher GST and a far simplier income tax system – there were effectively no deductions or subsidies, just PAYE… with no mandatory need to complete a return at the end of the tax year.

What does Aus do? Have 5 tax reviews and do nothing with them.

And then you’ve got the States and the local councils bickering.
Abolish the states.


Bring back the whip

Reply Quote