Date: 13/12/2016 15:50:25
From: transition
ID: 995950
Subject: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

How much do they contribute to the work of reality.

Chuck in a few examples (of humans for starters)

Being social requires privacy.

Humans are monogamous because they are polyamorous.

Norms are resented when imposed.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/12/2016 23:41:35
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 995986
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

transition said:


How much do they contribute to the work of reality.

Chuck in a few examples (of humans for starters)

Being social requires privacy.

Humans are monogamous because they are polyamorous.

Norms are resented when imposed.

For contradictory requirements, I always think of the term “doublethink” from George Orwell’s “1984”. “Doublethink is the act of simultaneously accepting two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct, often in distinct social contexts. Doublethink is related to, but differs from, hypocrisy and neutrality. Also related is cognitive dissonance, in which contradictory beliefs cause conflict in one’s mind. Doublethink is notable due to a lack of cognitive dissonance — thus the person is completely unaware of any conflict or contradiction.”

War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength.

Examples of “war is peace” include the peacemaker colt, the peacekeeper missile, the cold war. etc.

The next thing I think of is oxymorons. In particular “military intelligence”, also the “great depression”, “jumbo shrimp”, “cruel to be kind”, “act naturally”, etc. There’s a superb listing of oxymorons that helps to clarify social paradoxes on http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-oxymorons.html

Then on top of that, I notice that Trump is tilting at one of the greatest contradictory/paradoxical requirements right now: the one China policy. For many years, the USA and other countries have had the paradox of acknowledging China’s territorial claim of Taiwan at the same time as, with real battleships, protecting Taiwan from China.

You can take that further to the TV series “Holidays in countries that don’t exist”.

Still in the arena of politics and warfare is “the great lie”.

Another contradictory/paradoxical requirement is “truth in advertising”.

Then there’s Santa Claus. A belief in Santa Claus brings cash rewards to children. In the same bucket you could add Halloween, ghost tours, other financially rewarding lies for the tourists.

On top of that, there’s the superhero paradox. We don’t believe in superheros, yet people know and react to superheros as if they were real.

Another contradictory/paradoxical of current society is “the news”.

Is that enough for now?

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 01:47:40
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 996015
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

I keep thinking of more examples.

“You can’t win, you can’t break even and you can’t quit the game”. But every major western philosophy is based on the idea that you can win – capitalism, break even – communism, or quit the game – spiritualism.

The president of the US is kept completely isolated from the people he rules.

Success breeds jealousy, jealousy breeds competition, competition breeds security, security breeds secrecy, secrecy breeds corruption, corruption breeds failure.

Casinos and the war on drugs are taxes on crime.

Education prepares children for work by keeping them away from work.

Famous people are held up as role models.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 01:58:09
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 996019
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Legal system

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 03:48:18
From: transition
ID: 996067
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

mollwollfumble said:


Legal system

yeah suppose the law criminalizes, but’s often forget it protects that lawful (even and perhaps particularly of those that committed a crime)

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 03:49:38
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 996069
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

transition said:


mollwollfumble said:

Legal system

yeah suppose the law criminalizes, but’s often forget it protects that lawful (even and perhaps particularly of those that committed a crime)

Scratches head.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 03:53:38
From: transition
ID: 996070
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

The Rev Dodgson said:


transition said:

mollwollfumble said:

Legal system

yeah suppose the law criminalizes, but’s often forget it protects that lawful (even and perhaps particularly of those that committed a crime)

Scratches head.

protects a person that has commited a criminal act from further whatevers(arbitrary stuff). Limits punishment, retribution.

that you did a bad thing does not make all else by association bad too. That sort of thing. Proper process, fair process

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 03:59:12
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 996073
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

transition said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

transition said:

yeah suppose the law criminalizes, but’s often forget it protects that lawful (even and perhaps particularly of those that committed a crime)

Scratches head.

protects a person that has commited a criminal act from further whatevers(arbitrary stuff). Limits punishment, retribution.

that you did a bad thing does not make all else by association bad too. That sort of thing. Proper process, fair process

OK, I’d go along with that.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:06:13
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996115
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Violent behavior in Football matches vs Violent Behavior on the street

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:08:11
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996116
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Pedophile priests

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:10:24
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996118
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Law abiding religious people who respect other peoples rights

but are willing to interfere with the the rights of homosexuals, women who want abortions and elderly who want euthanasia

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:13:26
From: Cymek
ID: 996119
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

The people most valued in society (with a few exceptions) contribute the least value and if the world was thrown into crisis wouldn’t be much use except as labour

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:20:06
From: Cymek
ID: 996120
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Government exempt from being sued or held accountable for outright lies and corruption yet impose that on the rest of the population (with the exception of their friends)

Only “bad” guys commit war crimes.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:23:09
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996123
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

The Hypocrisy of Religion in Modern Society

basically an observation that people committing adultery while going to church every Sunday

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:26:30
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996126
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

101 Contradictions in the Bible

Bible Contradictions

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:27:58
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996128
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

The Truth about Hypocrisy Charges of hypocrisy can be surprisingly irrelevant and oft

FORMER U.S. VICE PRESIDENT Al Gore urges us all to reduce our carbon footprint, yet he regularly flies in a private jet. Former drug czar William Bennett extols the importance of temperance but is reported to be a habitual gambler. Pastor Ted Haggard preached the virtues of “the clean life” until allegations of methamphetamine use and a taste for male prostitutes arose. Eliot Spitzer prosecuted prostitution rings as attorney general in New York State, but he was later found to be a regular client of one such ring.

More…

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:37:42
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996132
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Donald Trump’s Greatest Self-Contradictions

“I have no intention of running for president.” (Time, September 14, 1987)

“I am officially running for president.” (New York, June 16, 2015)

“I don’t want it for myself. I don’t need it for myself.” (ABC News, November 20, 2015)

“I wanted to do this for myself. … I had to do it for myself.” (Time, August 18, 2015)

“Politicians are all talk and no action.” (Twitter, May 27, 2015)

“I’m not a politician.” (CNN, August 11, 2015)

more…

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:38:24
From: diddly-squat
ID: 996133
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Cymek said:


Government exempt from being sued or held accountable for outright lies and corruption yet impose that on the rest of the population (with the exception of their friends)

Only “bad” guys commit war crimes.

governments (and in fact politicians) are not exempt and are held accountable

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:40:19
From: Cymek
ID: 996135
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

diddly-squat said:


Cymek said:

Government exempt from being sued or held accountable for outright lies and corruption yet impose that on the rest of the population (with the exception of their friends)

Only “bad” guys commit war crimes.

governments (and in fact politicians) are not exempt and are held accountable

On rare occasions it seems and usually when someone else wants to bring them down not because they’ve done something wrong

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:43:46
From: diddly-squat
ID: 996138
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Cymek said:


diddly-squat said:

Cymek said:

Government exempt from being sued or held accountable for outright lies and corruption yet impose that on the rest of the population (with the exception of their friends)

Only “bad” guys commit war crimes.

governments (and in fact politicians) are not exempt and are held accountable

On rare occasions it seems and usually when someone else wants to bring them down not because they’ve done something wrong

if a politician dose something that is clearly wrong and gets caught, they rarely survive… if they do something morally questionable and get caught, they are often demoted

if a politician says one thing and does the other, then they often pay the price by being ridiculed by the other side of politics

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:44:28
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996139
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Tobacco has health warnings, advertisements removed

yet alcohol causes health problems and drink driving deaths yet no health warnings at all

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:45:57
From: Cymek
ID: 996140
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

CrazyNeutrino said:


Tobacco has health warnings, advertisements removed

yet alcohol causes health problems and drink driving deaths yet no health warnings at all

Cause being a piss head is the Australian way.
They do have alcohol warnings ads on tv though

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:46:40
From: Tamb
ID: 996141
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Cymek said:


CrazyNeutrino said:

Tobacco has health warnings, advertisements removed

yet alcohol causes health problems and drink driving deaths yet no health warnings at all

Cause being a piss head is the Australian way.
They do have alcohol warnings ads on tv though


Gambling ads give mixed messages.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:48:04
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996142
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Studying contradictions is a great way to learn logic and ethics.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:48:44
From: Cymek
ID: 996143
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence yet its not applied to religion and that’s OK cause you just gotta have faith.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:49:43
From: Cymek
ID: 996144
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Tamb said:


Cymek said:

CrazyNeutrino said:

Tobacco has health warnings, advertisements removed

yet alcohol causes health problems and drink driving deaths yet no health warnings at all

Cause being a piss head is the Australian way.
They do have alcohol warnings ads on tv though


Gambling ads give mixed messages.

They do don’t they especially with those apps were you can gamble one handed no matter what else you are doing almost promoting an addiction

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:50:30
From: diddly-squat
ID: 996145
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Many of the things you have listed are not contradictory, nor paradoxical .

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:53:46
From: Cymek
ID: 996147
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

diddly-squat said:


Many of the things you have listed are not contradictory, nor paradoxical .

Such as ?

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:53:59
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996148
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Cymek said:


Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence yet its not applied to religion and that’s OK cause you just gotta have faith.

To preach God exists to people when there is no proof is unethical, to use people vulnerabilities for preaching is also unethical.

There are many contradictions in religion.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 05:59:08
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996152
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

10 Breathtaking Examples Of U.S Government Hypocrisy

Congress Broke Their Own Insider Trading Laws

Washington Flouts Its Extradition Treaties

We Arm Our Enemies

We Use Chemical Weapons

Washington Illegally Funded A Violent Coup

The NSA Hypocrisy

Our Governments Encourage Human Rights Abuses

The Nuclear Double Standard

Iran-Contra

Murdering Civilians

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:00:14
From: diddly-squat
ID: 996154
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Cymek said:


diddly-squat said:

Many of the things you have listed are not contradictory, nor paradoxical .

Such as ?

*Violent behavior in Football matches vs Violent Behavior on the street *Pedophile priests *The people most valued in society (with a few exceptions) contribute the least value and if the world was thrown into crisis wouldn’t be much use except as labour *On rare occasions it seems and usually when someone else wants to bring them down not because they’ve done something wrong *Tobacco has health warnings, advertisements removed yet alcohol causes health problems and drink driving deaths yet no health warnings at all *Gambling ads give mixed messages

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:01:11
From: diddly-squat
ID: 996156
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

diddly-squat said:


Cymek said:

diddly-squat said:

Many of the things you have listed are not contradictory, nor paradoxical .

Such as ?

  • Violent behavior in Football matches vs Violent Behavior on the street
  • Pedophile priests
  • The people most valued in society (with a few exceptions) contribute the least value and if the world was thrown into crisis wouldn’t be much use except as labour
  • On rare occasions it seems and usually when someone else wants to bring them down not because they’ve done something wrong
  • Tobacco has health warnings, advertisements removed yet alcohol causes health problems and drink driving deaths yet no health warnings at all
*Gambling ads give mixed messages

Now with bullet points

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:01:14
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996157
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

The hypocrisy of civil society

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:06:40
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996158
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

What are the most extreme examples of hypocrisy?

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:12:06
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 996161
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Cymek said:


Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence yet its not applied to religion and that’s OK cause you just gotta have faith.

I’ve been a bit so/so about many of the examples listed so far, but I think that really rings true. It’s quite extraordinary that we just accept it without a second thought most of the time.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:14:09
From: diddly-squat
ID: 996162
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

The Rev Dodgson said:


Cymek said:

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence yet its not applied to religion and that’s OK cause you just gotta have faith.

I’ve been a bit so/so about many of the examples listed so far, but I think that really rings true. It’s quite extraordinary that we just accept it without a second thought most of the time.

I think that is becoming less common though… especially now with large proportions of the population being highly educated

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:14:18
From: furious
ID: 996163
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

They should have a royal commission into God … that ought to sort it out…

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:18:24
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 996164
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

diddly-squat said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

Cymek said:

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence yet its not applied to religion and that’s OK cause you just gotta have faith.

I’ve been a bit so/so about many of the examples listed so far, but I think that really rings true. It’s quite extraordinary that we just accept it without a second thought most of the time.

I think that is becoming less common though… especially now with large proportions of the population being highly educated

To some extent, but public debate is still full of statements that imply that unquestioning faith is unquestionably good, and these are very rarely questioned.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:22:48
From: Cymek
ID: 996165
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

The Rev Dodgson said:


diddly-squat said:

The Rev Dodgson said:

I’ve been a bit so/so about many of the examples listed so far, but I think that really rings true. It’s quite extraordinary that we just accept it without a second thought most of the time.

I think that is becoming less common though… especially now with large proportions of the population being highly educated

To some extent, but public debate is still full of statements that imply that unquestioning faith is unquestionably good, and these are very rarely questioned.

If a god was real it should be able to prove it assuming its actually capable of interacting with us.
For something to be a god it would have to be scientific and therefore would want logical thinking and proof not blind faith

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:28:52
From: transition
ID: 996166
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

>Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence yet its not applied to religion and that’s OK cause you just gotta have faith

the soft fleshy things do require some soft-reality

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:31:44
From: Cymek
ID: 996167
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

The claims photocopiers and printer make when they say “toner needs replacing or is nearly empty” and you get a few more thousand pages out of it.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:43:22
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 996168
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

>>For something to be a god it would have to be scientific

Nah, science and spirituality are different paradigms.
You cant set science up as an arbiter on matters religious.
You cant prove God exists by mathematical scribbles on a blackboard, He didn’t make it that easy.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:48:25
From: Stumpy_seahorse
ID: 996169
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Peak Warming Man said:


>>For something to be a god it would have to be scientific

Nah, science and spirituality are different paradigms.
You cant set science up as an arbiter on matters religious.
You cant prove God exists by mathematical scribbles on a blackboard, He didn’t make it that easy.

just like you can’t pray for science to work…

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:48:50
From: Tamb
ID: 996170
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Cymek said:


The claims photocopiers and printer make when they say “toner needs replacing or is nearly empty” and you get a few more thousand pages out of it.

When you partner asks “Does my bum look big in this? Be honest, I won’t be offended”

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:50:42
From: Stumpy_seahorse
ID: 996171
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Tamb said:


Cymek said:

The claims photocopiers and printer make when they say “toner needs replacing or is nearly empty” and you get a few more thousand pages out of it.

When you partner asks “Does my bum look big in this? Be honest, I won’t be offended”

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:54:10
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996172
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Stumpy_seahorse said:


Peak Warming Man said:

>>For something to be a god it would have to be scientific

Nah, science and spirituality are different paradigms.
You cant set science up as an arbiter on matters religious.
You cant prove God exists by mathematical scribbles on a blackboard, He didn’t make it that easy.

just like you can’t pray for science to work…

Yet science works! and it does not involve praying, it involves observation and validation

Praying just wastes time

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:56:21
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996173
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Ill have to add hypocrisy to the mind map on problems with humans

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:57:35
From: Tamb
ID: 996175
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

CrazyNeutrino said:


Ill have to add hypocrisy to the mind map on problems with humans


If selfdelusion isn’t on there it should be.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 06:57:58
From: Stumpy_seahorse
ID: 996176
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

CrazyNeutrino said:


Stumpy_seahorse said:

Peak Warming Man said:

>>For something to be a god it would have to be scientific

Nah, science and spirituality are different paradigms.
You cant set science up as an arbiter on matters religious.
You cant prove God exists by mathematical scribbles on a blackboard, He didn’t make it that easy.

just like you can’t pray for science to work…

Yet science works! and it does not involve praying, it involves observation and validation

Praying just wastes time

and… as usual…

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 07:01:38
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996179
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Tamb said:


CrazyNeutrino said:

Ill have to add hypocrisy to the mind map on problems with humans


If selfdelusion isn’t on there it should be.

yes, ok, reminds me, I’ll add vanity as well as trolls, psychopaths, sadism, narcissism etc

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 07:04:26
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996182
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Stumpy_seahorse said:


CrazyNeutrino said:

Stumpy_seahorse said:

just like you can’t pray for science to work…

Yet science works! and it does not involve praying, it involves observation and validation

Praying just wastes time

and… as usual…


If people want to waste time believing in nothing, and feeling good about it, that fine, its like some spiritual placebo.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 07:06:54
From: furious
ID: 996184
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

You might also want to note that contradiction <> hypocrisy …

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 07:11:46
From: Cymek
ID: 996188
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

furious said:

  • Ill have to add hypocrisy to the mind map on problems with humans

You might also want to note that contradiction <> hypocrisy …

It’s often savage

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 07:18:53
From: Stumpy_seahorse
ID: 996197
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Cymek said:


furious said:
  • Ill have to add hypocrisy to the mind map on problems with humans

You might also want to note that contradiction <> hypocrisy …

It’s often savage


savage?

weren’t those the wonder years?..

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 07:20:35
From: transition
ID: 996199
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

>weren’t those the wonder years?..

that the handsome yours truly

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 07:21:05
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 996200
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

But then the opposite is also true.

Stumpy_seahorse said:


and… as usual…


Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 07:33:45
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 996214
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

More contradictory requirements:

Soul vs soulless. Both are false.

Spirits vs spirits.

The list of oxymorons in my previous link is so good I want to use up bandwidth by posting them here.

Great Depression
Jumbo shrimp
Cruel to be kind
Pain for pleasure
Clearly confused
Act naturally
Beautifully painful
Painfully beautiful
Deafening silence
Pretty ugly
Pretty fierce
Pretty cruel
Definitely maybe
Living dead
Walking dead
Only choice
Amazingly awful
Alone together
Virtual reality
Random order
Original copy
Happy sad
Disgustingly delicious
Run slowly
Awfully good
Awfully delicious
Small crowd
Dark light
Light darkness
Dark snow
Open secret
Passive aggressive
Appear invisible
Awfully lucky
Awfully pretty
Big baby
Tiny elephant
Wake up dead
Goodbye reception
Growing smaller
Least favorite
True myth
Typically weird
Typically odd
Naturally strange
Weirdly normal
Unpopular celebrity
Worthless gold
Sad joy
Liquid food
Heavy diet
Noticeable absence
Quiet presence
Short wait
Sweet agony

Read more at http://examples.yourdictionary.com/examples-of-oxymorons.html#8w3vTaFxJU7MJF6K.99

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 07:35:13
From: Cymek
ID: 996218
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

Walking dead

Call them zombies damn it

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 08:44:53
From: PermeateFree
ID: 996260
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

I see Crazy has been on another roll; did he get anywhere this time?

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 11:08:37
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 996298
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

PermeateFree said:


I see Crazy has been on another roll; did he get anywhere this time?

Not yet. But have a go at his mind maps.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 11:46:58
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996316
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

mollwollfumble said:


PermeateFree said:

I see Crazy has been on another roll; did he get anywhere this time?

Not yet. But have a go at his mind maps.

I dont yet fully understand the scope of contradictions, the scope of hypocrisy and most negative bias, still on a learning curve with all of those.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 15:12:32
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 996412
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

CrazyNeutrino said:


mollwollfumble said:

PermeateFree said:

I see Crazy has been on another roll; did he get anywhere this time?

Not yet. But have a go at his mind maps.

I dont yet fully understand the scope of contradictions, the scope of hypocrisy and most negative bias, still on a learning curve with all of those.

But you understand truth, which is a rare talent.
Truth and beauty are all you need, according to Einstein.

Reply Quote

Date: 14/12/2016 15:44:01
From: CrazyNeutrino
ID: 996420
Subject: re: contradictory/paradoxical requirements

mollwollfumble said:


CrazyNeutrino said:

mollwollfumble said:

Not yet. But have a go at his mind maps.

I dont yet fully understand the scope of contradictions, the scope of hypocrisy and most negative bias, still on a learning curve with all of those.

But you understand truth, which is a rare talent.
Truth and beauty are all you need, according to Einstein.

I did a CAE http://www.cae.edu.au/ course on philosophy around twenty years ago, the course covered knowing, believing, truth and ethics.

Having some knowledge of truth can give people deeper insight into observation and empathy.

Reply Quote