Date: 16/12/2016 05:41:21
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 997256
Subject: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 05:44:02
From: Tamb
ID: 997260
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Peak Warming Man said:
rubs hands
The prematch starts in about 15 minutes.
Date: 16/12/2016 05:47:28
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 997263
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
They’ve been training all the winter,
And there’s not a team that’s fitter,
And that’s the way it’s gotta be.
‘Cos you’re up against the best y’know.
This is Super Test y’know.
And you’ve gotta beat the best the world has seen.
Lillie’s pounding down like a machine.
Pascoe’s making divots in the green.
Marsh is takin’ wickets.
Hooksie’s clearing pickets.
And the Chappells’ eyes have got that killer gleam.
Mr Walker’s playing havoc with the bats.
Redpath, it’s good to see ya back.
Laird is making runs.
Dougie’s chewing gum.
And Gilmore’s wielding willow like an axe.
C’mon Aussie, c’mon, c’mon
C’mon Aussie, c’mon, c’mon
C’mon Aussie, c’mon, c’mon
C’mon Aussie, c’mon.
Date: 16/12/2016 05:47:48
From: party_pants
ID: 997266
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Tamb said:
Peak Warming Man said:
rubs hands
The prematch starts in about 15 minutes.
covers ears
Date: 16/12/2016 05:49:20
From: furious
ID: 997268
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
- The prematch starts in about 15 minutes.
I would have thought the pre-match has been ongoing since the big bang…
Date: 16/12/2016 05:56:26
From: party_pants
ID: 997270
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
furious said:
- The prematch starts in about 15 minutes.
I would have thought the pre-match has been ongoing since the big bang…
No. That is giving a literal definition to a name or commonly used term.
Date: 16/12/2016 06:31:42
From: party_pants
ID: 997296
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 06:54:44
From: diddly-squat
ID: 997305
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 07:00:29
From: furious
ID: 997306
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Heartbeats: they were racin’
Freedom: he was chasin’
Spotlights: sirens
rifles: firing
Date: 16/12/2016 08:27:52
From: Ian
ID: 997337
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
WTF 2 Ozzie test openers playing like test openers?!
Until that reverse sweep anyhow..
Date: 16/12/2016 08:37:48
From: Michael V
ID: 997344
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 08:46:18
From: Michael V
ID: 997348
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 08:46:43
From: diddly-squat
ID: 997349
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 08:50:35
From: Tamb
ID: 997354
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Michael V said:
And that’s Khawaja..
I’ve been waiting for him to get a duck so I can sing
“Poor old Khawaja
He never got a hit”
From Hank Williams Poor ol’
KAW-
LIGA
Date: 16/12/2016 13:54:33
From: Woodie
ID: 997598
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Carm on ya doofus! Ya been stuck on 98 for an hour. Get ya bloody hundred will ya! I wanna go cook meself some tea.
Date: 16/12/2016 13:58:31
From: party_pants
ID: 997602
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 13:58:41
From: Ian
ID: 997603
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 13:59:53
From: Woodie
ID: 997604
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Hoo bloody ray! Now I can go cook me dinner.
Date: 16/12/2016 14:00:56
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 997605
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Go and have your tea, Woodie.
Date: 16/12/2016 14:01:58
From: party_pants
ID: 997606
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Woodie said:
Hoo bloody ray! Now I can go cook me dinner.
can you cook me some while you’re there?
Date: 16/12/2016 14:02:43
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 997607
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Hey Speedy did you see that S17 is doing ok?
Date: 16/12/2016 14:06:51
From: dv
ID: 997610
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Ian said:
TONNE!
I love you, Ian.
Date: 16/12/2016 14:15:48
From: party_pants
ID: 997614
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
stumps.
might be time to stick something on the microwave and apply electromagnetic radiation.
Date: 16/12/2016 14:18:05
From: Ian
ID: 997616
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
dv said:
Ian said:
TONNE!
I love you, Ian.
O….K..
But you hardly know me.
Date: 16/12/2016 14:20:11
From: dv
ID: 997617
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Ian said:
dv said:
Ian said:
TONNE!
I love you, Ian.
O….K..
But you hardly know me.
Yes but your commitment to SI is heartwarming.
Date: 16/12/2016 14:21:05
From: Ian
ID: 997619
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Our new guys are doing well.
Could be looking at a cricket score tomorrow.
Date: 16/12/2016 14:31:05
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 997622
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Ian said:
Our new guys are doing well.
Could be looking at a cricket score tomorrow.
Hehe.
But a run is an imperial unit even though there are 100 runs in a tonne.
Date: 16/12/2016 15:00:28
From: dv
ID: 997638
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
So a decent turnout. ESPNDisney says that it is the highest ever 1st day test turnout at the Gabba, other than Ashes.
Date: 16/12/2016 15:04:35
From: party_pants
ID: 997640
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
dv said:
So a decent turnout. ESPNDisney says that it is the highest ever 1st day test turnout at the Gabba, other than Ashes.
Sounds good. I knew D/N tests would be popular. I enjoyed watching an hour or so of the last session at home after work.
Date: 16/12/2016 15:05:55
From: roughbarked
ID: 997641
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
party_pants said:
dv said:
So a decent turnout. ESPNDisney says that it is the highest ever 1st day test turnout at the Gabba, other than Ashes.
Sounds good. I knew D/N tests would be popular. I enjoyed watching an hour or so of the last session at home after work.
Yes. That is indeed the best part of day/night tests.
Date: 16/12/2016 15:15:05
From: sibeen
ID: 997642
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
I do hope no-one swore during this thread.
Date: 16/12/2016 15:17:04
From: party_pants
ID: 997644
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
sibeen said:
I do hope no-one swore during this thread.
Your hope is not well founded. Too many grumpy old curmudgeons around here setting a bad example for the little ‘uns. Now everybody is doing it.
Date: 16/12/2016 15:23:47
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 997645
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
sibeen said:
I do hope no-one swore during this thread.
I tied to raise the tone but people don’t seem to take someone named Bogsnorkler seriously.
Date: 16/12/2016 15:24:47
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 997646
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 15:26:14
From: roughbarked
ID: 997647
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Bogsnorkler said:
sibeen said:
I do hope no-one swore during this thread.
I tied to raise the tone but people don’t seem to take someone named Bogsnorkler seriously.
They are probably having difficulty working out which nog you snorkel.
Date: 16/12/2016 15:26:43
From: roughbarked
ID: 997648
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 15:28:05
From: party_pants
ID: 997649
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 15:28:54
From: dv
ID: 997650
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Someone said fuck but I think we got away with it
Date: 16/12/2016 15:29:16
From: dv
ID: 997651
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
party_pants said:
hog bog
night hob
Date: 16/12/2016 15:31:22
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 997652
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 15:31:55
From: dv
ID: 997653
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 16/12/2016 15:51:54
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 997654
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 07:45:46
From: Ian
ID: 997906
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
No double tonne for Smitty
FUCK
Date: 17/12/2016 07:54:37
From: Tamb
ID: 997911
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Ian said:
No double tonne for Smitty
FUCK
130 isn’t bad though.
Date: 17/12/2016 08:01:59
From: Ian
ID: 997918
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 08:28:15
From: Ian
ID: 997921
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 08:28:45
From: diddly-squat
ID: 997922
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 08:38:18
From: Ian
ID: 997923
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Hanscomb passes 87. Bit streaky but it looks like he will kick on…
Date: 17/12/2016 08:38:49
From: Ian
ID: 997924
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 08:40:10
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 997926
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Ian said:
Hanscomb passes 87. Bit streaky but it looks like he will kick on…
Yeah.
Date: 17/12/2016 08:57:28
From: Ian
ID: 997928
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 10:32:53
From: party_pants
ID: 997937
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
429 is not bad, Happy with that.
Date: 17/12/2016 10:54:18
From: Ian
ID: 997941
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 12:37:24
From: party_pants
ID: 998013
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
nice catch Smitty!
Batsman: please depart the field in the direction of the dressing room ———->
Date: 17/12/2016 12:38:16
From: Bubblecar
ID: 998014
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
party_pants said:
nice catch Smitty!
Batsman: please depart the field in the direction of the dressing room ———->
See? It doesn’t hurt to be polite.
Date: 17/12/2016 12:39:10
From: party_pants
ID: 998016
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Duck next ball
Batsman: follow your mate
Date: 17/12/2016 12:56:01
From: party_pants
ID: 998028
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
that sounded bad – crack on the helmet
Date: 17/12/2016 13:10:25
From: party_pants
ID: 998032
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 13:10:31
From: Ian
ID: 998033
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 13:23:28
From: Ian
ID: 998042
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 13:24:05
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998043
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
when did pakistan start playing like australia?…
Date: 17/12/2016 13:27:46
From: Ian
ID: 998049
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Snicked behind, off side… there’s a turn up
Date: 17/12/2016 13:30:21
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998052
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 13:30:29
From: Ian
ID: 998053
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 13:39:13
From: Woodie
ID: 998060
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
turns cricket on
six fuh!!! WTF?
Date: 17/12/2016 13:40:15
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998062
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Woodie said:
turns cricket on
six fuh!!! WTF?
early xmas break..
Date: 17/12/2016 13:51:33
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998064
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 13:53:23
From: Witty Rejoinder
ID: 998066
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
stumpy_seahorse said:

Doesn’t Bashar al-Assad have a war to wage somewhere?
Date: 17/12/2016 13:54:54
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998067
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 14:03:28
From: Woodie
ID: 998068
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
stumpy_seahorse said:

Not as good as thins one. :)

Date: 17/12/2016 14:03:56
From: sibeen
ID: 998069
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
stumpy_seahorse said:

WTF is that supposed to mean?
People come here for terse, up to date commentary. Not fucking charades.
Date: 17/12/2016 14:05:33
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998071
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Woodie said:
stumpy_seahorse said:

Not as good as thins one. :)


Date: 17/12/2016 14:07:00
From: Ian
ID: 998072
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Meanwhile, at the Gabba
FUCK OFF
Date: 17/12/2016 14:09:24
From: Bubblecar
ID: 998073
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 14:09:29
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998074
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
sibeen said:
stumpy_seahorse said:

WTF is that supposed to mean?
People come here for terse, up to date commentary. Not fucking charades.
BIYBB…
Date: 17/12/2016 14:10:54
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998075
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Bubblecar said:
FUCK ON

Date: 17/12/2016 14:28:20
From: Ian
ID: 998083
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 17/12/2016 14:30:51
From: sibeen
ID: 998084
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Ian said:
FUCK OFF
cough premature cough
Date: 17/12/2016 14:32:19
From: Ian
ID: 998085
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
sibeen said:
Ian said:
FUCK OFF
cough premature cough
Nah. I was OFF by a few FUCKS.
Date: 18/12/2016 05:22:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 998320
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
The dancing Lyon.

Date: 18/12/2016 07:49:01
From: party_pants
ID: 998368
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
So… make them follow on, or have a bat during the day and declare with about 90 minutes left of the night session?
Date: 18/12/2016 07:54:54
From: party_pants
ID: 998369
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
that’s bullshit. close enough!
Date: 18/12/2016 07:55:53
From: Ian
ID: 998372
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 18/12/2016 07:56:22
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998373
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
party_pants said:
So… make them follow on, or have a bat during the day and declare with about 90 minutes left of the night session?
watch australia fuck it up and snatch a draw from the jaws of victory…
Date: 18/12/2016 07:58:59
From: Ian
ID: 998375
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
stumpy_seahorse said:
party_pants said:
So… make them follow on, or have a bat during the day and declare with about 90 minutes left of the night session?
watch australia fuck it up and snatch a draw from the jaws of victory…
Pakistan are paying $67 for the win. Hmmm
Date: 18/12/2016 08:03:45
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998377
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Ian said:
stumpy_seahorse said:
party_pants said:
So… make them follow on, or have a bat during the day and declare with about 90 minutes left of the night session?
watch australia fuck it up and snatch a draw from the jaws of victory…
Pakistan are paying $67 for the win. Hmmm
what’s a draw paying?
Date: 18/12/2016 08:04:49
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 998378
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
party_pants said:
that’s bullshit. close enough!
Yeah, you cant give that out, who was the third umpire?
Date: 18/12/2016 08:07:46
From: Ian
ID: 998380
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
stumpy_seahorse said:
Ian said:
stumpy_seahorse said:
watch australia fuck it up and snatch a draw from the jaws of victory…
Pakistan are paying $67 for the win. Hmmm
what’s a draw paying?
$29
Date: 18/12/2016 08:08:30
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998381
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Peak Warming Man said:
party_pants said:
that’s bullshit. close enough!
Yeah, you cant give that out, who was the third umpire?

Date: 18/12/2016 08:08:53
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998382
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Ian said:
stumpy_seahorse said:
Ian said:
Pakistan are paying $67 for the win. Hmmm
what’s a draw paying?
$29
tempting
Date: 18/12/2016 08:15:28
From: roughbarked
ID: 998385
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 18/12/2016 08:24:09
From: party_pants
ID: 998387
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Peak Warming Man said:
who was the third umpire?
that Chinese bloke, Sum Dum bum.
Date: 18/12/2016 09:49:24
From: Ian
ID: 998403
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
What’s the story with what Taylor was saying about the closness of that referral? The ball was shown almost going over the top but he was only talking about its lateral position.. So about 80% of the ball was shown missing the stumps.
Date: 18/12/2016 09:56:53
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 998406
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Ian said:
What’s the story with what Taylor was saying about the closness of that referral? The ball was shown almost going over the top but he was only talking about its lateral position.. So about 80% of the ball was shown missing the stumps.
if more than half of the ball is shown to be missing the stumps, it goes with what the field umpire initially called it as.
I think to cover for errors in the predicted flight
Date: 18/12/2016 10:02:40
From: Ian
ID: 998411
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
stumpy_seahorse said:
Ian said:
What’s the story with what Taylor was saying about the closness of that referral? The ball was shown almost going over the top but he was only talking about its lateral position.. So about 80% of the ball was shown missing the stumps.
if more than half of the ball is shown to be missing the stumps, it goes with what the field umpire initially called it as.
I think to cover for errors in the predicted flight
You miss my point about the 70% misssing over the top.
Date: 19/12/2016 02:49:51
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 998636
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Nic Maddinson may have failed again with the bat but he still earned praise for his selfless second innings cameo in Australia’s day-night Test against Pakistan in Brisbane.
Four runs may not look like a productive return on the scoreboard, especially if it is next to the name of under-fire rookie Maddinson.
But Australia team-mate Usman Khawaja says Maddinson’s second innings meant a lot to the hosts.
Maddinson thrashed his first Test boundary but went out swinging next ball from the bowling of Wahab Riaz in Australia’s quest for quick runs before a declaration on day three on Saturday.
—————————————————————————————-
Who writes this shit?
Date: 19/12/2016 10:37:09
From: Michael V
ID: 998819
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Goddim!
Azhar out, caught behind off the bowling of Starc.
:)
Date: 19/12/2016 10:43:30
From: roughbarked
ID: 998825
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Michael V said:
Goddim!
Azhar out, caught behind off the bowling of Starc.
:)
You are to be commended for not using that word. ;)
Date: 19/12/2016 11:34:35
From: Michael V
ID: 998862
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 19/12/2016 11:53:32
From: roughbarked
ID: 998869
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Michael V said:
Goddim.
It was a silly shot. He deserved to lose his wicket with it.
Date: 19/12/2016 13:29:20
From: Ian
ID: 998894
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
6 fer.. They’ll never do it.
Date: 19/12/2016 14:54:43
From: party_pants
ID: 998957
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 19/12/2016 16:05:00
From: Michael V
ID: 998994
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Final over for the night. It’s been an interesting match.
Date: 19/12/2016 16:05:51
From: Michael V
ID: 998995
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 19/12/2016 16:06:10
From: party_pants
ID: 998996
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Michael V said:
Final over for the night. It’s been an interesting match.
yeah, they are getting damn close.
Date: 19/12/2016 16:06:56
From: party_pants
ID: 998997
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
finally a catch is taken!
Date: 19/12/2016 16:07:28
From: Michael V
ID: 998999
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 19/12/2016 16:10:42
From: Michael V
ID: 999001
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
8/382 at stumps. 108 for Pakistan to win.
Date: 19/12/2016 16:12:06
From: party_pants
ID: 999002
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Michael V said:
8/382 at stumps. 108 for Pakistan to win.
Highest ever 4th inning score at the Gabba, and first time under lights. Maybe batting at night isn’t so bad after all.
Date: 19/12/2016 16:17:45
From: party_pants
ID: 999003
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Should be a good day tomorrow.
Pity I won’t be able to watch it. My boss is over our office tomorrow and he usually sets up shop in the meeting room. Which is where the only TV is.
Date: 19/12/2016 16:18:20
From: Michael V
ID: 999004
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
8/382 at stumps. 108 for Pakistan to win.
Highest ever 4th inning score at the Gabba, and first time under lights. Maybe batting at night isn’t so bad after all.
I think that’s a reasonable observation.
Tomorrow is going to be exciting, I think. Especially if Aus don’t get an early wicket.
Date: 19/12/2016 16:19:29
From: Michael V
ID: 999007
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
party_pants said:
Should be a good day tomorrow.
Pity I won’t be able to watch it. My boss is over our office tomorrow and he usually sets up shop in the meeting room. Which is where the only TV is.
Run the TV without sound. Listen surreptitiously with an earplug.
;)
Date: 19/12/2016 16:21:10
From: party_pants
ID: 999010
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Michael V said:
party_pants said:
Should be a good day tomorrow.
Pity I won’t be able to watch it. My boss is over our office tomorrow and he usually sets up shop in the meeting room. Which is where the only TV is.
Run the TV without sound. Listen surreptitiously with an earplug.
;)
my desk is in another room.
Date: 19/12/2016 16:37:54
From: Michael V
ID: 999024
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
party_pants said:
Should be a good day tomorrow.
Pity I won’t be able to watch it. My boss is over our office tomorrow and he usually sets up shop in the meeting room. Which is where the only TV is.
Run the TV without sound. Listen surreptitiously with an earplug.
;)
my desk is in another room.
Bummer. I’ll watch it for you.
;)
Date: 19/12/2016 16:38:55
From: party_pants
ID: 999026
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Michael V said:
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
Run the TV without sound. Listen surreptitiously with an earplug.
;)
my desk is in another room.
Bummer. I’ll watch it for you.
;)
I have the CA app on my new mobile. I’ll cope I guess.
Date: 19/12/2016 16:42:28
From: Michael V
ID: 999031
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
party_pants said:
my desk is in another room.
Bummer. I’ll watch it for you.
;)
I have the CA app on my new mobile. I’ll cope I guess.
:)
Date: 20/12/2016 05:02:06
From: dv
ID: 999216
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
I “watched” the fourth day on ABC radio while driving. Remarkable comeback.
Date: 20/12/2016 05:05:20
From: diddly-squat
ID: 999223
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
dv said:
I “watched” the fourth day on ABC radio while driving. Remarkable comeback.
quite… There are two extreme possibilities for today’s play
1. it will be over in a blink
2. it will be the most extraordinary day of test cricket ever…
The other option of course is a prolonged Australian win
Date: 20/12/2016 07:02:41
From: diddly-squat
ID: 999280
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Pakistan 8/402
The Pakies need 88 runs to win or Australia need to take 2 wickets
Date: 20/12/2016 07:47:57
From: Ian
ID: 999297
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
“Australia is clearly agitated.”
Facinating
Date: 20/12/2016 07:56:26
From: sibeen
ID: 999299
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
What was the odds for a Pakistan win?
Date: 20/12/2016 07:57:08
From: diddly-squat
ID: 999300
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 20/12/2016 07:57:49
From: Ian
ID: 999301
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 20/12/2016 07:58:18
From: diddly-squat
ID: 999302
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 20/12/2016 07:59:09
From: Ian
ID: 999303
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
sibeen said:
What was the odds for a Pakistan win?
I saw $67
Date: 20/12/2016 08:07:00
From: Rule 303
ID: 999306
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
The suspenders are killing me…
Date: 20/12/2016 08:10:47
From: Rule 303
ID: 999309
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 20/12/2016 08:11:09
From: Ian
ID: 999310
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 20/12/2016 08:16:42
From: Ian
ID: 999314
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 20/12/2016 08:20:01
From: party_pants
ID: 999315
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
that was too close for comfort.
Date: 20/12/2016 08:20:48
From: dv
ID: 999316
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Date: 20/12/2016 08:25:27
From: Ian
ID: 999317
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
dv said:
what a match
Always amazing when it gets down to <50 runs and 1 wicket, day 5 :))
Date: 20/12/2016 09:15:45
From: Michael V
ID: 999347
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Ian said:
dv said:
what a match
Always amazing when it gets down to <50 runs and 1 wicket, day 5 :))
Yep.
:)
Date: 20/12/2016 09:17:25
From: Tamb
ID: 999350
Subject: re: Australia v Pakistan 1st Test 2016
Michael V said:
Ian said:
dv said:
what a match
Always amazing when it gets down to <50 runs and 1 wicket, day 5 :))
Yep.
:)
The Boxing Day Test will be very interesting.