Date: 4/02/2017 12:21:37
From: Ian
ID: 1020343
Subject: Richat Structure

When I was wandering aimlessly through the desert of west–central Mauritania (via Google) I stumbled upon this massive round structure and immediately assumed it was an impact crater.
The huge 40-kilometer diameter circular structure is also known as the Eye of the Sahara or Guell al-Richat. The eye emerged from differential erosion.

For a while, scientists did think that the Eye of the Sahara was an impact crater. But they didn’t find enough melted rock to make that guess hold water. Current theories suggest a much more complicated story behind this incredible natural formation.

The main ring structure of the Eye is the eroded remains of what was once a dome of layers of the Earth’s crust.


The current theory on how it formed

Scientists still have questions about the Eye of the Sahara. But two Canadian geologists have a working theory about its origins.

They think the Eye’s formation began more than 100 million years ago, as the supercontinent Pangaea was ripped apart by plate tectonics and what are now Africa and South America were being torn away from each other.

Molten rock pushed up towards the surface but didn’t make it all the way, creating a dome of rock layers, like a very large pimple. This also created fault lines circling the Eye and crossing it. The molten rock also dissolved limestone near the center of the eye, which collapsed to form a special type of rock called breccia.

A little after 100 million years ago, the Eye erupted violently. That collapsed the bubble partway, and erosion did the rest of the work to create the Eye we know today. The rings are made of different types of rock that erode at different speeds. The paler circle near the center of the Eye is volcanic rock created during that explosion.

Modern astronauts are fond of the Eye because so much of the Sahara Desert is an unbroken sea of sand. The Eye is one of the few breaks in the monotony, and now it’s become a key landmark for them.

http://gizmodo.com/the-eye-of-the-sahara-is-an-enigmatic-desert-landmark-1607604961

Geology

Reply Quote

Date: 4/02/2017 12:33:10
From: stumpy_seahorse
ID: 1020345
Subject: re: Richat Structure

could be a bush turkey nest…

:P

Reply Quote

Date: 4/02/2017 12:52:32
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1020349
Subject: re: Richat Structure

stumpy_seahorse said:


could be a bush turkey nest…

:P

It was aliens.

Reply Quote

Date: 4/02/2017 13:10:11
From: Ian
ID: 1020354
Subject: re: Richat Structure

There are some people who try to attribute the Richat Structure in Oudane, Mauritania, as being lasered into the Earth by aliens.

Reply Quote

Date: 4/02/2017 13:49:01
From: furious
ID: 1020359
Subject: re: Richat Structure

Sarlacc…

Reply Quote

Date: 4/02/2017 14:18:07
From: dv
ID: 1020365
Subject: re: Richat Structure

Ian said:


There are some people who try to attribute the Richat Structure in Oudane, Mauritania, as being lasered into the Earth by aliens.

That’s ridiculous. For starters the Silurians are not “aliens” per se.

Reply Quote

Date: 4/02/2017 15:10:28
From: roughbarked
ID: 1020380
Subject: re: Richat Structure

stumpy_seahorse said:


could be a bush turkey nest…

:P

Your humour is misdirected but I gro’kt it anyway.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/02/2017 07:07:12
From: Ian
ID: 1020609
Subject: re: Richat Structure

Hey Michael, were you aware of this structure?

Do you know of any other examples of these processes at work on a large scale?

Reply Quote

Date: 5/02/2017 07:23:59
From: Michael V
ID: 1020618
Subject: re: Richat Structure

Ian said:


Hey Michael, were you aware of this structure?

Do you know of any other examples of these processes at work on a large scale?

No, I wasn’t aware of it. Thanks for putting it up. Interesting.

Without the igneous process to build the dome, there are many examples of differential erosion forming circular structures. Any dome-and-basin province, for instance has examples (dome and basin provinces are caused by folding – compression from two different horizontal directions). There are quite a few domes and basins in the Flinders ranges. Wilpena pound is a famous basin (not dome).

I do have some doubts about the igneous theory. Intrusions in general do not inflate the landscape. They intrude along faults when movement on the fault produces a void. The igneous fluid then flows from higher pressure to lower pressure.

Reply Quote

Date: 5/02/2017 07:37:59
From: Ian
ID: 1020624
Subject: re: Richat Structure

Without the igneous process to build the dome, there are many examples of differential erosion forming circular structures. Any dome-and-basin province, for instance has examples (dome and basin provinces are caused by folding – compression from two different horizontal directions). There are quite a few domes and basins in the Flinders ranges. Wilpena pound is a famous basin (not dome).

I do have some doubts about the igneous theory. Intrusions in general do not inflate the landscape. They intrude along faults when movement on the fault produces a void. The igneous fluid then flows from higher pressure to lower pressure.

———
Thanks. There seems to be many and varied theories about its formation.
It’s’ probably a unique example of whatever it is :)

Reply Quote

Date: 7/02/2017 06:42:27
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1021363
Subject: re: Richat Structure

Michael V said:


Ian said:

Hey Michael, were you aware of this structure?

Do you know of any other examples of these processes at work on a large scale?

No, I wasn’t aware of it. Thanks for putting it up. Interesting.

Without the igneous process to build the dome, there are many examples of differential erosion forming circular structures. Any dome-and-basin province, for instance has examples (dome and basin provinces are caused by folding – compression from two different horizontal directions). There are quite a few domes and basins in the Flinders ranges. Wilpena pound is a famous basin (not dome).

I do have some doubts about the igneous theory. Intrusions in general do not inflate the landscape. They intrude along faults when movement on the fault produces a void. The igneous fluid then flows from higher pressure to lower pressure.

> Intrusions in general do not inflate the landscape.

No? I was taught about intrusions that inflate the landscape very many years ago back in high school.

What about the igneous dome in case C and feature 4 in this image from wikipedia? That would be my first guess for the Richat structure.

Reply Quote

Date: 9/02/2017 13:32:03
From: Ian
ID: 1022436
Subject: re: Richat Structure

This thing reminds me of a suppurating abscess I once had on my leg.

(don’t search for that if you are eating)

Reply Quote