I think there needs to be a new web standard for readability
points should be taken off for White Backgrounds to read text on
points should be taken off for clutter
points should be taken off for poor color choices
we need a Next Button standard as well
Tau.Neutrino said:
I think there needs to be a new web standard for readabilitypoints should be taken off for White Backgrounds to read text on
points should be taken off for clutter
points should be taken off for poor color choices
we need a Next Button standard as well
10 points off for a video ad – includes introductory video on home page
20 points off for a video ad that you can’t cancel
10 points off for a popup window
30 points off for a video ad that you can’t cancel on a popup window.
points off for a each photo ad
more points off for each repeat of the same photo ad
more points off for a fake button that looks like a “more” or “continue” or “next” or “start” button.
points off for a website without needed hyperlinks
points off for a website with no information other than motherhood statements
Points off for each bitch tag. eg. the following is a set of three bitch tags.
“This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)”
“This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2015)”
“This article uses abbreviations that may be confusing or ambiguous. (February 2015)”
Points off for each “donate now” textbox.
mollwollfumble said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I think there needs to be a new web standard for readabilitypoints should be taken off for White Backgrounds to read text on
points should be taken off for clutter
points should be taken off for poor color choices
we need a Next Button standard as well
10 points off for a video ad – includes introductory video on home page
20 points off for a video ad that you can’t cancel
10 points off for a popup window
30 points off for a video ad that you can’t cancel on a popup window.
points off for a each photo ad
more points off for each repeat of the same photo ad
more points off for a fake button that looks like a “more” or “continue” or “next” or “start” button.points off for a website without needed hyperlinks
points off for a website with no information other than motherhood statements
Yes to all those, not sure what you mean with the last one.
Points off whenever the font size for numbers doesn’t match the font size for text (eg. Wikipedia)
Points off when text is too small or too large.
Points off for each web page that doesn’t contain a mathematical equation.
Points of for each web page that doesn’t contain at least one relevant image.
Points off for every text background other than a plain one.
Points off for the holiday forum because the left column is blank until “by time” or “by topic” is clicked, and even then initially runs the left column off archive on android.
Points off for frames.
Points off for curvy or archaic fonts.
Points off for all images that can’t be right-clicked.
Points off for text placed in image files instead of in html text.
Points off for images with “sample only” or similar scrawled all over the front.
Points off for “artists impression”.
No points at all for a web page where advertising takes up more than 1/4 of the total space.
Points off for a webpage that doesn’t allow feedback.
Points off for a webpage showing more than three feedback comments.
Points off for a web page that greys out the everything but the top however many cm of screen.
Points off for pinterest.
mollwollfumble said:
Points off for each bitch tag. eg. the following is a set of three bitch tags.“This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)”
“This article needs additional citations for verification. (February 2015)”
“This article uses abbreviations that may be confusing or ambiguous. (February 2015)”Points off for each “donate now” textbox.
All those could be placed at the bottom of the related page, on going matters.
Tau.Neutrino said:
mollwollfumble said:
points off for a website with no information other than motherhood statements
Yes to all those, not sure what you mean with the last one.
For last one, I mean for instance a company home page that consists only of saying how great the company is. Or vague “feel good” platitudes that few people would disagree with. For example: “Our country must contribute to world peace.”
Points off for obnoxious ads that are either intrusive or mixed in with the article you want to read so its hard to tell which is the real link and which is the ads.
mollwollfumble said:
Points off whenever the font size for numbers doesn’t match the font size for text (eg. Wikipedia)Points off when text is too small or too large.
Points off for each web page that doesn’t contain a mathematical equation.
Points of for each web page that doesn’t contain at least one relevant image.
Points off for every text background other than a plain one.
Points off for the holiday forum because the left column is blank until “by time” or “by topic” is clicked, and even then initially runs the left column off archive on android.
Points off for frames.
Points off for curvy or archaic fonts.
Points off for all images that can’t be right-clicked.
Points off for text placed in image files instead of in html text.
Points off for images with “sample only” or similar scrawled all over the front.
Points off for “artists impression”.
No points at all for a web page where advertising takes up more than 1/4 of the total space.
Points off for a webpage that doesn’t allow feedback.
Points off for a webpage showing more than three feedback comments.
Points off for a web page that greys out the everything but the top however many cm of screen.
Points off for pinterest.
Agree with most of those
points off for slide shows, especially those that reload the whole page with each slide
points off for webpages that take too long to load
points off for webpages that are too large in megabytes
points off for wepages that cannot be switched to night viewing ( too many lumens at bed time is not good)
Points off for a video that plays without asking. Videos should just have a Play button you can click on if you want to watch it.
party_pants said:
Points off for a video that plays without asking. Videos should just have a Play button you can click on if you want to watch it.
+1
Peak Warming Man said:
party_pants said:
Points off for a video that plays without asking. Videos should just have a Play button you can click on if you want to watch it.
+1
+1
party_pants said:
Points off for a video that plays without asking. Videos should just have a Play button you can click on if you want to watch it.
Yes
Points off for offering you Russian Brides.
People interface through screens to the internet, readability is important because it also has to take into account that everybody is different and visual needs are different as well, aesthetics too.
points off to webpages that offer no flexibility
points awarded to websites that make it easy for scripting programs to change Style Sheets
Tau.Neutrino said:
I think there needs to be a new web standard for readabilitypoints should be taken off for White Backgrounds to read text on
points should be taken off for clutter
points should be taken off for poor color choices
we need a Next Button standard as well
How about just simply award 0 points for bad punctuation and incorrect capitalisation,
And using commas instead of question marks?
furious said:
- How about just simply award 0 points for bad punctuation and incorrect capitalisation,
And using commas instead of question marks?
0 marks it is…
diddly-squat said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
I think there needs to be a new web standard for readabilitypoints should be taken off for White Backgrounds to read text on
points should be taken off for clutter
points should be taken off for poor color choices
we need a Next Button standard as well
How about just simply award 0 points for bad punctuation and incorrect capitalisation,
thats my fast typing mistakes
soory
diddly-squat said:
furious said:
- How about just simply award 0 points for bad punctuation and incorrect capitalisation,
And using commas instead of question marks?
0 marks it is…
ok, I’ll brush up on my typing skills.
Let him who is without sin cast the first stone…
furious said:
- ok, I’ll brush up on my typing skills.
Let him who is without sin cast the first stone…
And women who wear fake beards
Men pretending to be women pretending to be men…
furious said:
- And women who wear fake beards
Men pretending to be women pretending to be men…
Women wearing fake vulvae would be suspicious.
Re hyperlinks
5 points off for broken hyperlinks
points off for “if you want … click on hyperlink” but it takes you somewhere else
points off for non-hyperlink text coloured to look like hyperlink
points off for hyperlink text coloured to look like non-hyperlink
points off for a list of hyperlinks with names so similar or abstruse that it’s impossible to decide which you want
points off when the hyperlink you want most is hidden in a sub-page (eg. you have to click “quick links” to find what you want).
5 points off for a hyperlink roundabout – no matter how many links you click you’ll never end up where you want to go.
] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] want to go
points off for web page colours that aren’t colourblind-safe
Points off for poorly named webpages
Points off for bookmarked webpages with poorly named webpages under bookmark properties
Tau.Neutrino said:
Peak Warming Man said:
party_pants said:
Points off for a video that plays without asking. Videos should just have a Play button you can click on if you want to watch it.
+1
+1
mollwollfumble said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Peak Warming Man said:+1
+1
+1
I think were are in broad agreement then.
mollwollfumble said:
Tau.Neutrino said:
Peak Warming Man said:+1
+1
+1
well, there go all the news sites