Speedy said:
dv said:
If you look at the distribution on the map, it seems unlikely that the plant only exists in the search area.
It all looks very misleading AFAICT.
http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/threatenedspeciesapp/profile.aspx?id=20323
NSW Environment Dept’s page states
The areas shown in pink and/purple are the sub-regions where the species or community is known or predicted to occur. They may not occur thoughout the sub-region but may be restricted to certain areas…The information presented in this map is only indicative and may contain errors and omissions.
http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/threatenedspeciesapp/profile.aspx?id=20323
Plantnet appears to highlight the entire Sydney Metro region but does provides a link to AVH (Australia’s Virtual Herbarium)’s map, which shows a single location only, being the site that the SMH article was referring to.
http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=sp&name=Hibbertia~fumana
http://avh.ala.org.au/occurrences/search?q=lsid%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fid.biodiversity.org.au%2Fnode%2Fapni%2F2888438&qc=data_hub_uid:dh2&fq=country%3A%22Australia%22#tab_mapView
Usually with rare plant species, the exact location is not mentioned to stop vandalism or people collecting them. Distribution maps are restricted by scale or to general localities. If a species has not been recorded further afield than specified, especially around a built up area, then it is highly unlikely that it exists elsewhere, although they surprisingly do pop up a considerable distance away. Herbaria have extensive collections of all flora within their domain, so very unusual not to have on record, any unknown or lost species, although if a species has not been collected within the past 50 years, it is presumed extinct, which in practice is more applicable to areas near human habitation.