Date: 25/03/2017 08:19:07
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1042389
Subject: Time Question

If the smallest point in space is the plank limit, what is the smallest period of time?

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 08:25:37
From: diddly-squat
ID: 1042390
Subject: re: Time Question

Tau.Neutrino said:


If the smallest point in space is the plank limit, what is the smallest period of time?

the Plank Time

It’s the smallest amount of time over with it doesn’t hurt when you lie in a push up position with you weight on your forearms and your body perfectly straight.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 08:25:48
From: ChrispenEvan
ID: 1042391
Subject: re: Time Question

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_time

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 08:30:03
From: diddly-squat
ID: 1042392
Subject: re: Time Question

it’s probably fair to point out that the Plant Time probably doesn’t have any specific physical meaning as it’s a result of dimensional analysis… it’s essentially a scaling factor…

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 08:30:37
From: poikilotherm
ID: 1042393
Subject: re: Time Question

Unlike Hammer Time…

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 08:31:36
From: diddly-squat
ID: 1042394
Subject: re: Time Question

poikilotherm said:


Unlike Hammer Time…

Stop

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 08:44:54
From: dv
ID: 1042395
Subject: re: Time Question

diddly-squat said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

If the smallest point in space is the plank limit, what is the smallest period of time?

the Plank Time

One of the most straightforward Q&As we’ll ever have.

(Planck, of course)

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 08:48:27
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1042396
Subject: re: Time Question

diddly-squat said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

If the smallest point in space is the plank limit, what is the smallest period of time?

the Plank Time

It’s the smallest amount of time over with it doesn’t hurt when you lie in a push up position with you weight on your forearms and your body perfectly straight.

Thanks

Alternatively to the straight push ups is the 45 degree pushups one can do using a sofa or a bed

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 08:58:58
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1042399
Subject: re: Time Question

For Planck length, mass, time, energy and temperature see:

http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/P/Planck+Units

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 13:21:13
From: KJW
ID: 1042526
Subject: re: Time Question

Tau.Neutrino said:


If the smallest point in space is the plank limit, what is the smallest period of time?

Quantising of space and time in terms of Planck length and Planck time violates special relativity.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 13:43:26
From: dv
ID: 1042539
Subject: re: Time Question

KJW said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

If the smallest point in space is the plank limit, what is the smallest period of time?

Quantising of space and time in terms of Planck length and Planck time violates special relativity.

Phew! SR always troubled me.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 14:06:48
From: Dropbear
ID: 1042550
Subject: re: Time Question

dv said:


KJW said:

Tau.Neutrino said:

If the smallest point in space is the plank limit, what is the smallest period of time?

Quantising of space and time in terms of Planck length and Planck time violates special relativity.

Phew! SR always troubled me.

Oh cursed spite that i was ever born to put it right

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 14:11:20
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1042552
Subject: re: Time Question

KJW said:

Quantising of space and time in terms of Planck length and Planck time violates special relativity.

That’s a good point. I once saw a derivation of General Relativity that allows the quantisation of space and time at the Planck scale. But the result doesn’t necessarily match up to classical GR at those scales.

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 14:13:09
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1042554
Subject: re: Time Question

mollwollfumble said:


KJW said:

Quantising of space and time in terms of Planck length and Planck time violates special relativity.

That’s a good point. I once saw a derivation of General Relativity that allows the quantisation of space and time at the Planck scale. But the result doesn’t necessarily match up to classical GR at those scales.

Why would you want it to?

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 14:14:41
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1042556
Subject: re: Time Question

The Rev Dodgson said:


mollwollfumble said:

KJW said:

Quantising of space and time in terms of Planck length and Planck time violates special relativity.

That’s a good point. I once saw a derivation of General Relativity that allows the quantisation of space and time at the Planck scale. But the result doesn’t necessarily match up to classical GR at those scales.

Why would you want it to?

Well, you’d want Einstein to be right?

Reply Quote

Date: 25/03/2017 14:17:50
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1042557
Subject: re: Time Question

mollwollfumble said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

mollwollfumble said:

That’s a good point. I once saw a derivation of General Relativity that allows the quantisation of space and time at the Planck scale. But the result doesn’t necessarily match up to classical GR at those scales.

Why would you want it to?

Well, you’d want Einstein to be right?

Why would I?

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2017 04:57:17
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 1042808
Subject: re: Time Question

I don’t know about the smallest time unit, but the most important time is “Stubby time” which is any time, and you don’t even need to be awake!

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2017 04:59:39
From: Tamb
ID: 1042810
Subject: re: Time Question

bob(from black rock) said:


I don’t know about the smallest time unit, but the most important time is “Stubby time” which is any time, and you don’t even need to be awake!

There is a more sophisticated time. Wine o’clock.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2017 05:02:26
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 1042813
Subject: re: Time Question

Tamb said:


bob(from black rock) said:

I don’t know about the smallest time unit, but the most important time is “Stubby time” which is any time, and you don’t even need to be awake!

There is a more sophisticated time. Wine o’clock.

Trouble with this time period is that it quickly degenerates into “Whine o’clock”

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2017 05:05:56
From: Tamb
ID: 1042814
Subject: re: Time Question

bob(from black rock) said:


Tamb said:

bob(from black rock) said:

I don’t know about the smallest time unit, but the most important time is “Stubby time” which is any time, and you don’t even need to be awake!

There is a more sophisticated time. Wine o’clock.

Trouble with this time period is that it quickly degenerates into “Whine o’clock”

Better than One Tequila. Two tequila. Three tequila . Floor.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2017 05:09:10
From: bob(from black rock)
ID: 1042815
Subject: re: Time Question

Tamb said:


bob(from black rock) said:

Tamb said:

There is a more sophisticated time. Wine o’clock.

Trouble with this time period is that it quickly degenerates into “Whine o’clock”

Better than One Tequila. Two tequila. Three tequila . Floor.

But that does stop the “Whine” time slot .

Reply Quote

Date: 26/03/2017 05:12:51
From: Tamb
ID: 1042816
Subject: re: Time Question

bob(from black rock) said:


Tamb said:

bob(from black rock) said:

Trouble with this time period is that it quickly degenerates into “Whine o’clock”

Better than One Tequila. Two tequila. Three tequila . Floor.

But that does stop the “Whine” time slot .

True.

Reply Quote