Date: 13/04/2017 01:31:26
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1051137
Subject: Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum.

Physicists Discover an Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum

Nanoparticles can be pushed by pure nothingness.

Researchers have discovered a new and unexpected force that acts on nanoparticles in a vacuum, allowing them to be pushed around by pure ‘nothingness’.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/04/2017 03:46:25
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1051163
Subject: re: Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum.

Tau.Neutrino said:


Physicists Discover an Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum

Nanoparticles can be pushed by pure nothingness.

Researchers have discovered a new and unexpected force that acts on nanoparticles in a vacuum, allowing them to be pushed around by pure ‘nothingness’.

Looks interesting, but I wish they wouldn’t call a vacuum “pure nothingness”.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/04/2017 03:48:24
From: furious
ID: 1051164
Subject: re: Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum.

Because only God is pure?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/04/2017 03:51:00
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1051167
Subject: re: Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum.

furious said:

  • I wish they wouldn’t call a vacuum “pure nothingness”.

Because only God is pure?

No, because a vacuum is full of whatever is left when you remove the air from a region of space filled with air, which certainly isn’t nothing.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/04/2017 03:54:28
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1051168
Subject: re: Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum.

The Rev Dodgson said:


furious said:
  • I wish they wouldn’t call a vacuum “pure nothingness”.

Because only God is pure?

No, because a vacuum is full of whatever is left when you remove the air from a region of space filled with air, which certainly isn’t nothing.

Which the article says itself, right under the headline.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/04/2017 04:00:28
From: dv
ID: 1051170
Subject: re: Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum.

The Rev Dodgson said:


furious said:
  • I wish they wouldn’t call a vacuum “pure nothingness”.

Because only God is pure?

No, because a vacuum is full of whatever is left when you remove the air from a region of space filled with air, which certainly isn’t nothing.

Is it an absence of somethingness?

Reply Quote

Date: 13/04/2017 04:21:25
From: Cymek
ID: 1051177
Subject: re: Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum.

dv said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

furious said:
  • I wish they wouldn’t call a vacuum “pure nothingness”.

Because only God is pure?

No, because a vacuum is full of whatever is left when you remove the air from a region of space filled with air, which certainly isn’t nothing.

Is it an absence of somethingness?

So a vacuum is a like an Aero bar

Reply Quote

Date: 13/04/2017 04:24:08
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1051181
Subject: re: Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum.

dv said:


The Rev Dodgson said:

furious said:
  • I wish they wouldn’t call a vacuum “pure nothingness”.

Because only God is pure?

No, because a vacuum is full of whatever is left when you remove the air from a region of space filled with air, which certainly isn’t nothing.

Is it an absence of somethingness?

Only if you limit “something” to those things that are not included in the things that make up a vacuum.

Reply Quote

Date: 13/04/2017 06:18:29
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1051258
Subject: re: Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum.

Tau.Neutrino said:


Physicists Discover an Unexpected Force Acting on Nanoparticles in a Vacuum

Nanoparticles can be pushed by pure nothingness.

Researchers have discovered a new and unexpected force that acts on nanoparticles in a vacuum, allowing them to be pushed around by pure ‘nothingness’.

> To figure out how else Casimir forces could impact nanoparticles, the team looked at what happened with nanoparticles rotating near a flat surface in a vacuum. What they found was that the Casimir effect could actually push those nanoparticles laterally – even if they weren’t touching the surface.

Is this theory or experiment? If experiment, how did they stop the beams used for observations from influencing the motion?

(Check abstract)

“Working within the framework of fluctuational electrodynamics, we derive analytical expressions for the lateral force and analyze its dependence on the geometrical and material properties of the system.”

Oh, so theoretical only. Pity.

Reply Quote