Date: 20/05/2017 09:51:20
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1067962
Subject: IBM reveals commercial quantum computer processor

IBM reveals prototype of its first commercial quantum computer processor

Research teams looking to crunch massive data sets have had access to IBM’s quantum processor through the cloud for about a year, and now the company is upping that power with a new generation of processors. The first, boasting 16 quantum bits (qubits), will increase the processing power available through the cloud, while the second is twice as powerful again and designed as a prototype of a commercial quantum processor.

more…

Reply Quote

Date: 20/05/2017 10:36:19
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1067982
Subject: re: IBM reveals commercial quantum computer processor

Gee. A computer that has 16 bits.

This’ll really give the abacus a serious competitor.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/05/2017 10:38:37
From: Michael V
ID: 1067983
Subject: re: IBM reveals commercial quantum computer processor

Cynic.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/05/2017 10:38:59
From: sibeen
ID: 1067984
Subject: re: IBM reveals commercial quantum computer processor

mollwollfumble said:


Gee. A computer that has 16 bits.

This’ll really give the abacus a serious competitor.

What?

Reply Quote

Date: 20/05/2017 10:46:58
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1067988
Subject: re: IBM reveals commercial quantum computer processor

IBM’s current cloud-accessible quantum processor is built with 5 qubits, meaning it effectively has the computing power of 32 traditional bits. With 16 qubits, the new version has the equivalent of 65,536 bits.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/05/2017 12:11:40
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1068025
Subject: re: IBM reveals commercial quantum computer processor

Tau.Neutrino said:


IBM’s current cloud-accessible quantum processor is built with 5 qubits, meaning it effectively has the computing power of 32 traditional bits. With 16 qubits, the new version has the equivalent of 65,536 bits.

Just checking that. With superdense coding 1 qubit can hold 2 classical bits.

For an NP complete problem that has a solution that takes at most n bits to encode (eg. 6 bits means solution in range 0 to 63) then a classical computer takes 2^n = 64 units of time to solve. A quantum computer would take 2^(n/2) = 8 units of time to solve, which is much better.

But n qubits is definitely not equal to 2^n bits.

Reply Quote

Date: 22/05/2017 11:40:58
From: KJW
ID: 1068934
Subject: re: IBM reveals commercial quantum computer processor

mollwollfumble said:


But n qubits is definitely not equal to 2^n bits.

I think it should be noted why n qubits is worth much more than n classical bits. There are two things at play: Firstly, a qubit is a superposition of two different classical values and the weighting of each value corresponds to a single complex number (two real numbers) for a qubit. However, just as an analogue computer is limited by accuracy and precision of the values, so is the weighting of a qubit. Secondly, and most importantly, multiple qubits can be in a state of quantum entanglement with each other, which greatly expands the range of possibilities compared to the same number of classical bits.

Reply Quote