If two particles exist in the Higgs energy field (space) then does it makes sense that if there is any entanglement, the two particles are communicating their characteristics through the Higgs energy field?
Tau.Neutrino said:
If two particles exist in the Higgs energy field (space) then does it makes sense that if there is any entanglement, the two particles are communicating their characteristics through the Higgs energy field?
Tau.Neutrino said:
If two particles exist in the Higgs energy field (space) then does it makes sense that if there is any entanglement, the two particles are communicating their characteristics through the Higgs energy field?
My knee-jerk reaction is that all the Higgs field does is to give particles rest mass.
There are at least half a dozen different types of quantum entanglement, but none does or could involve rest mass. So the Higgs field can have nothing to do with particle entanglement.
?
Tau.Neutrino said:
If two particles exist in the Higgs energy field (space) then does it makes sense that if there is any entanglement, the two particles are communicating their characteristics through the Higgs energy field?
As I said in the other thread:
“Quantum entanglement can be readily understood by considering the superposition of entire spacetimes. One does not need to invoke continued communication between the entangled particles. But bear in mind that entanglement does require either direct or indirect interaction between the particles at some point in their histories.”
Also, bear in mind that quantum entanglement is a part of standard quantum mechanics in which there is no mention of the Higgs field. Thus, the Higgs field is not involved in quantum entanglement.
Note that as soon as the notion of quantum superposition is introduced, quantum entanglement stops becoming mysterious.