Date: 29/06/2017 05:47:30
From: transition
ID: 1084162
Subject: rethinking the humble blink

i’m not convinced the humble eye blink is just to dampen the eyeballs, clean them etc.

isn’t there a bit more happening?

I mean you’re going from lights on to lights off. There’s something much more happening.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 06:35:05
From: buffy
ID: 1084164
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

Here you go, this lot should keep you going for a while.

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC510520/pdf/brjopthal00688-0001.pdf&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwidr7Dor-HUAhWFn5QKHSPKCbQQFggVMAg&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNGYDblGKfsqcJSPrbXZifQfEBefIg

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824881/&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwidr7Dor-HUAhWFn5QKHSPKCbQQFggPMAU&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNFcV7QUwNMcqLcPKchysazykdtDKA

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9222228&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwidr7Dor-HUAhWFn5QKHSPKCbQQFggXMAk&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNE1r0DWsGr22VJeprOiQ7hvIhcKbg

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8266635&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiV0a3bsOHUAhUEE7wKHY31Bek4ChAWCAswAw&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNE6Dc8TAfLS8rlwcHUGrtOUpUYXFw

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849103/&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiOq_WVseHUAhVIabwKHR8ICFw4HhAWCBowCQ&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNEKycb9k3nWaZrEne6P8kcIPnC1Eg

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 08:08:56
From: poikilotherm
ID: 1084170
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

buffy said:

Here you go, this lot should keep you going for a while.

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC510520/pdf/brjopthal00688-0001.pdf&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwidr7Dor-HUAhWFn5QKHSPKCbQQFggVMAg&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNGYDblGKfsqcJSPrbXZifQfEBefIg

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824881/&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwidr7Dor-HUAhWFn5QKHSPKCbQQFggPMAU&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNFcV7QUwNMcqLcPKchysazykdtDKA

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9222228&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwidr7Dor-HUAhWFn5QKHSPKCbQQFggXMAk&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNE1r0DWsGr22VJeprOiQ7hvIhcKbg

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8266635&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiV0a3bsOHUAhUEE7wKHY31Bek4ChAWCAswAw&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNE6Dc8TAfLS8rlwcHUGrtOUpUYXFw

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849103/&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiOq_WVseHUAhVIabwKHR8ICFw4HhAWCBowCQ&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNEKycb9k3nWaZrEne6P8kcIPnC1Eg

lol, no one reads links on the forum ;)

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 08:27:12
From: Michael V
ID: 1084176
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

I dunno about that. I thought “Blink and you’ll miss it: the role of blinking in the perception of magic tricks” interesting.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 10:12:44
From: Ian
ID: 1084208
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

poikilotherm said:


buffy said:

Here you go, this lot should keep you going for a while.

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC510520/pdf/brjopthal00688-0001.pdf&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwidr7Dor-HUAhWFn5QKHSPKCbQQFggVMAg&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNGYDblGKfsqcJSPrbXZifQfEBefIg

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4824881/&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwidr7Dor-HUAhWFn5QKHSPKCbQQFggPMAU&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNFcV7QUwNMcqLcPKchysazykdtDKA

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9222228&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwidr7Dor-HUAhWFn5QKHSPKCbQQFggXMAk&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNE1r0DWsGr22VJeprOiQ7hvIhcKbg

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8266635&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiV0a3bsOHUAhUEE7wKHY31Bek4ChAWCAswAw&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNE6Dc8TAfLS8rlwcHUGrtOUpUYXFw

https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4849103/&sa=U&ved=0ahUKEwiOq_WVseHUAhVIabwKHR8ICFw4HhAWCBowCQ&client=internal-uds-cse&usg=AFQjCNEKycb9k3nWaZrEne6P8kcIPnC1Eg

lol, no one reads links on the forum ;)

No way I’m typing all that out.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 10:13:00
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1084209
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

I’ve been noticing lately that if I stare at something for long enough, the block colours vanish. It’s essentially like going blind. Blinking helps restore sight.

The vanishing of sight occurs through the superposition of image and afterimage.
It occurs because the retinal cells get tired of doing the same thing over and over again.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 10:16:21
From: Cymek
ID: 1084210
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

Perhaps we blink to give our brains time to process visual input

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 12:53:18
From: buffy
ID: 1084292
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

mollwollfumble said:


I’ve been noticing lately that if I stare at something for long enough, the block colours vanish. It’s essentially like going blind. Blinking helps restore sight.

The vanishing of sight occurs through the superposition of image and afterimage.
It occurs because the retinal cells get tired of doing the same thing over and over again.

Once a rod or cone has fired off its message there is a refractory period before it can fire again. In normal vision you make micromovements to keep the image moving onto different receptors. When you stare, you halt the micro movements and you ‘see’ the refractory time.

Similar explanation for afterimages. You sort of over do the blue, so the after image is yellow.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 12:58:38
From: Tamb
ID: 1084294
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

Another eye related one.
I thought our pupils would be fully dilated when awaking in a dark room at night
Observation seems to show otherwise.
If I go outside on a moonless night the sky seems starless. After a short while more & more stars become visible.
Would this be because my pupils are dilating?

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 13:02:18
From: buffy
ID: 1084296
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

Tamb said:


Another eye related one.
I thought our pupils would be fully dilated when awaking in a dark room at night
Observation seems to show otherwise.
If I go outside on a moonless night the sky seems starless. After a short while more & more stars become visible.
Would this be because my pupils are dilating?

No, you are dark adapting. The first part is 7ish minutes, full adaptation takes around 20 minutes. It’s the retina turning over from cone to rod vision. Here is a piece written by a bloke I trained with:

http://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/part-viii-gabac-receptors/light-and-dark-adaptation/

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 13:08:50
From: Tamb
ID: 1084300
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

buffy said:


Tamb said:

Another eye related one.
I thought our pupils would be fully dilated when awaking in a dark room at night
Observation seems to show otherwise.
If I go outside on a moonless night the sky seems starless. After a short while more & more stars become visible.
Would this be because my pupils are dilating?

No, you are dark adapting. The first part is 7ish minutes, full adaptation takes around 20 minutes. It’s the retina turning over from cone to rod vision. Here is a piece written by a bloke I trained with:

http://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/part-viii-gabac-receptors/light-and-dark-adaptation/

Wow! That is one spectacular piece of research.
Only bit I’m not sure about is that if I’ve been in the dark for several hours (asleep) with no light other than starlight wouldn’t I already be dark adapted?

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 13:12:11
From: buffy
ID: 1084301
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

Tamb said:


buffy said:

Tamb said:

Another eye related one.
I thought our pupils would be fully dilated when awaking in a dark room at night
Observation seems to show otherwise.
If I go outside on a moonless night the sky seems starless. After a short while more & more stars become visible.
Would this be because my pupils are dilating?

No, you are dark adapting. The first part is 7ish minutes, full adaptation takes around 20 minutes. It’s the retina turning over from cone to rod vision. Here is a piece written by a bloke I trained with:

http://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/part-viii-gabac-receptors/light-and-dark-adaptation/

Wow! That is one spectacular piece of research.
Only bit I’m not sure about is that if I’ve been in the dark for several hours (asleep) with no light other than starlight wouldn’t I already be dark adapted?

You would be past the first fast bit. Probably. Daylight vision is called photopic. In between, when both rods and cones are working is mesopic (like dusk). Dark vision is scotopic. You could search more if you want. But if you were asleep, woke, didn’t turn any lights on and went outside, you would be partway along the curve. But as soon as you turn a light on, or even look at a doorway with light, you start all over again.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 13:18:29
From: Tamb
ID: 1084304
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

buffy said:


Tamb said:

buffy said:

No, you are dark adapting. The first part is 7ish minutes, full adaptation takes around 20 minutes. It’s the retina turning over from cone to rod vision. Here is a piece written by a bloke I trained with:

http://webvision.med.utah.edu/book/part-viii-gabac-receptors/light-and-dark-adaptation/

Wow! That is one spectacular piece of research.
Only bit I’m not sure about is that if I’ve been in the dark for several hours (asleep) with no light other than starlight wouldn’t I already be dark adapted?

You would be past the first fast bit. Probably. Daylight vision is called photopic. In between, when both rods and cones are working is mesopic (like dusk). Dark vision is scotopic. You could search more if you want. But if you were asleep, woke, didn’t turn any lights on and went outside, you would be partway along the curve. But as soon as you turn a light on, or even look at a doorway with light, you start all over again.

At my age getting up in the night is compulsory. The only light is the microwave clock in the kitchen so maybe there is some indirect reflected green light from it.
I’ll turn it off tonight so there is no artificial light in the house & report back on it tomorrow.
The idea of being part way along the curve makes sense.
Would starlight count as reset light?

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 13:20:30
From: buffy
ID: 1084306
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

No, not bright enough. I can’t now remember what the reset brightness is. Does it say in Michael’s paper?

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 13:25:02
From: Tamb
ID: 1084307
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

buffy said:

No, not bright enough. I can’t now remember what the reset brightness is. Does it say in Michael’s paper?


Probably. I will have to comb through it unless I can search for “reset brightness”

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 15:29:33
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1084345
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

How much time does one spend blinking?

If you added up all the time in one day when the eye blinks, how much time is open and how much time is closed?

Searches.

A blink lasts for about 0.3 to 0.4 seconds. It is said that we blink about five times a minute, every minute, for about 18 hours a day. This adds up to 30 minutes a day and about 5 years in a lifetime. So we spend five years of our life with our eyes shut from blinking.

I’m sure I blink more than 5 times a minute.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 15:44:00
From: transition
ID: 1084351
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

Tau.Neutrino said:


How much time does one spend blinking?

If you added up all the time in one day when the eye blinks, how much time is open and how much time is closed?

Searches.

A blink lasts for about 0.3 to 0.4 seconds. It is said that we blink about five times a minute, every minute, for about 18 hours a day. This adds up to 30 minutes a day and about 5 years in a lifetime. So we spend five years of our life with our eyes shut from blinking.

I’m sure I blink more than 5 times a minute.

There’s lots of tricks in blinks.

You know like if you turn your head 30degrees quickly you can blink and save yourself the blur and attempt at extra processing between. Long enough too and the persistence (both in the eye, and of processing) from the previous image can extinguish some.

But something else happens. You got imagine processing, you blink, then there’s a mental state change (some configuration changes).

Nah I think there’s something special about blinks.

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 15:55:21
From: furious
ID: 1084357
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

Reply Quote

Date: 29/06/2017 16:04:58
From: transition
ID: 1084361
Subject: re: rethinking the humble blink

furious said:

  • Nah I think there’s something special about blinks.

http://i60.tinypic.com/2j6252t.gif

that too

Reply Quote