With some nice graphics.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-07-22/five-places-that-mark-australias-extreme-geological-past/8728928
With some nice graphics.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-07-22/five-places-that-mark-australias-extreme-geological-past/8728928

poles apart.
Peak Warming Man said:
With some nice graphics.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-07-22/five-places-that-mark-australias-extreme-geological-past/8728928
I took a bit of interest in the subsea area a little to the South of that, near Robe. Where the next volcano is going to form.
mollwollfumble said:
Peak Warming Man said:
With some nice graphics.!http://www.abc.net.au/cm/lb/8731430/data/murray-river-canyons-data.jpg
http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-07-22/five-places-that-mark-australias-extreme-geological-past/8728928
I took a bit of interest in the subsea area a little to the South of that, near Robe. Where the next volcano is going to form.
Tamb said:
mollwollfumble said:
Peak Warming Man said:
With some nice graphics.!http://www.abc.net.au/cm/lb/8731430/data/murray-river-canyons-data.jpg
http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-07-22/five-places-that-mark-australias-extreme-geological-past/8728928
I took a bit of interest in the subsea area a little to the South of that, near Robe. Where the next volcano is going to form.
The illustration is incorrect. It shows no rainforest in FNQ
And it shows grassland at sea in the Great Australian bight.
Tamb said:
Tamb said:
The illustration is incorrect. It shows no rainforest in FNQAnd it shows grassland at sea in the Great Australian bight.
The one in the 2nd post? It also shows Adelaide surrounded by desert. I presume it shows conditions when sea levels were much lower, but it isn’t from the first link, so I don’t now what the point was.
The article in the first link is very interesting, even if they do use SydHarbs as a unit of volume.
The Rev Dodgson said:
Tamb said:
Tamb said:
The illustration is incorrect. It shows no rainforest in FNQAnd it shows grassland at sea in the Great Australian bight.
The one in the 2nd post? It also shows Adelaide surrounded by desert. I presume it shows conditions when sea levels were much lower, but it isn’t from the first link, so I don’t now what the point was.
The article in the first link is very interesting, even if they do use SydHarbs as a unit of volume.
Must be using not the SI system but the SH.
Tamb said:
mollwollfumble said:
Peak Warming Man said:
With some nice graphics.!http://www.abc.net.au/cm/lb/8731430/data/murray-river-canyons-data.jpg
http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-07-22/five-places-that-mark-australias-extreme-geological-past/8728928
I took a bit of interest in the subsea area a little to the South of that, near Robe. Where the next volcano is going to form.
The illustration is incorrect. It shows no rainforest in FNQ
It’s just a little ahead of its time.
Reality will catch up with the map when the Chinese owners take possession.
mcgoon said:
Tamb said:
mollwollfumble said:I took a bit of interest in the subsea area a little to the South of that, near Robe. Where the next volcano is going to form.
The illustration is incorrect. It shows no rainforest in FNQIt’s just a little ahead of its time.
Reality will catch up with the map when the Chinese owners take possession.
I think you’d need the Dutch to grow grass in the bight.