Hey, LGBTQIAers, yeh, you can come join our group,,,, unless ?
A. you’re a hater. X
B, you’re homophobic, transphobic. X
C. you’re generally a bigot. X
D. you’re white ✔
University of Minnesota group bans Whites
Nothings worse than being LGBTQIA, and white
The_observer said:
Hey, LGBTQIAers, yeh, you can come join our group,,,, unless ?A. you’re a hater. X
B, you’re homophobic, transphobic. X
C. you’re generally a bigot. X
D. you’re white ✔
University of Minnesota group bans Whites
Nothings worse than being LGBTQIA, and white
experienced are you?
roughbarked said:
The_observer said:
Hey, LGBTQIAers, yeh, you can come join our group,,,, unless ?A. you’re a hater. X
B, you’re homophobic, transphobic. X
C. you’re generally a bigot. X
D. you’re white ✔
University of Minnesota group bans Whites
Nothings worse than being LGBTQIA, and white
experienced are you?
any comment on ’white’ LGBTQIA people being excluded rough ?
What if, say, the university choose to allow the recognition of only coloured gay marriage & not ’white gay marriage’ ?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm darling
The_observer said:
roughbarked said:
The_observer said:
Hey, LGBTQIAers, yeh, you can come join our group,,,, unless ?A. you’re a hater. X
B, you’re homophobic, transphobic. X
C. you’re generally a bigot. X
D. you’re white ✔
University of Minnesota group bans Whites
Nothings worse than being LGBTQIA, and white
experienced are you?
any comment on ’white’ LGBTQIA people being excluded rough ?
What if, say, the university choose to allow the recognition of only coloured gay marriage & not ’white gay marriage’ ?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm darling
talk about not answering my question.
roughbarked said:
The_observer said:
roughbarked said:experienced are you?
any comment on ’white’ LGBTQIA people being excluded rough ?
What if, say, the university choose to allow the recognition of only coloured gay marriage & not ’white gay marriage’ ?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm darling
talk about not answering my question.
What’s transphobic?
Does it mean you were phobic & are in the process of becoming less so? Or the opposite?
roughbarked said:
The_observer said:
roughbarked said:experienced are you?
any comment on ’white’ LGBTQIA people being excluded rough ?
What if, say, the university choose to allow the recognition of only coloured gay marriage & not ’white gay marriage’ ?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm darling
talk about not answering my question.
talk about ignoring the topic of the thread
The_observer said:
What if, say, the university choose to allow the recognition of only coloured gay marriage & not ’white gay marriage’ ?
The university itself is choosing neither for or not. There is a group at the university. Why do you hear/read into things that just aren’t there?
“Did you know there’s a tiny, obscure student group at the University of Minnesota specifically for LGBT people of color” here
What is the name of the group, Mr Observer? Do you know?
Woodie said:
The_observer said:What if, say, the university choose to allow the recognition of only coloured gay marriage & not ’white gay marriage’ ?
The university itself is choosing neither for or not. There is a group at the university. Why do you hear/read into things that just aren’t there?
“Did you know there’s a tiny, obscure student group at the University of Minnesota specifically for LGBT people of color” here
What is the name of the group, Mr Observer? Do you know?
white people are excluded.
That’s racism.
Oh, I know what your about to say – white people can’t be racially vilified. They can only be racists
The_observer said:
Woodie said:
The_observer said:What if, say, the university choose to allow the recognition of only coloured gay marriage & not ’white gay marriage’ ?
The university itself is choosing neither for or not. There is a group at the university. Why do you hear/read into things that just aren’t there?
“Did you know there’s a tiny, obscure student group at the University of Minnesota specifically for LGBT people of color” here
What is the name of the group, Mr Observer? Do you know?
white people are excluded.
That’s racism.
Oh, I know what your about to say – white people can’t be racially vilified. They can only be racists
The white man’s burden.
The_observer said:
Woodie said:
The_observer said:What if, say, the university choose to allow the recognition of only coloured gay marriage & not ’white gay marriage’ ?
The university itself is choosing neither for or not. There is a group at the university. Why do you hear/read into things that just aren’t there?
“Did you know there’s a tiny, obscure student group at the University of Minnesota specifically for LGBT people of color” here
What is the name of the group, Mr Observer? Do you know?
white people are excluded.
That’s racism.
Oh, I know what your about to say – white people can’t be racially vilified. They can only be racists
Stick to twitter Donald.
The_observer said:
Woodie said:
The_observer said:What if, say, the university choose to allow the recognition of only coloured gay marriage & not ’white gay marriage’ ?
The university itself is choosing neither for or not. There is a student group at the university. Why do you hear/read into things that just aren’t there?
What is the name of the group, Mr Observer? Do you know?
white people are excluded.
That’s racism.
Oh, I know what your about to say – white people can’t be racially vilified. They can only be racists
I’m not about to say any such thing. See…. you have not even researched. It is called “Tongues United” (named after the famous documentary “Tongues Untied” by Marlon Riggs & Essex Hemphill), here and here Nowhere on the Universities website does it say it EXCLUDES/BANS anyone. Nor can I find that on ANY material originating from the group. Yes, it says what the group is for.
“The website makes very clear that “Tongues Untied” is not intended for white and/or straight students, posting a disclaimer stating, “For our allies: we do appreciate your voices and commitment to dismantling racism and homophobia; however, please note that this is a space created for LGBTQIA and/or same-gender-loving people of color.”
“Did you know there’s a tiny, obscure student group at the University of Minnesota specifically for LGBT people of color”
“No, you didn’t know that? Because why would you? Because who gives a shit? “
“Tongues Untied even gives a gentle pat on the back to white and straight “allies” saying they “appreciate your voices and commitment to dismantling racism and homophobia.” They just ask that they occasionally have a group where they can meet alone. Is that too much to ask?”
here
Did you know there are 1400 student groups at that University? Have you looked at the other 1400 groups to see what they are for, and who these groups are intended for?
Shall I go on?
Woodie said:
The_observer said:
Woodie said:The university itself is choosing neither for or not. There is a student group at the university. Why do you hear/read into things that just aren’t there?
What is the name of the group, Mr Observer? Do you know?
white people are excluded.
That’s racism.
Oh, I know what your about to say – white people can’t be racially vilified. They can only be racists
I’m not about to say any such thing. See…. you have not even researched. It is called “Tongues United” (named after the famous documentary “Tongues Untied” by Marlon Riggs & Essex Hemphill), here and here Nowhere on the Universities website does it say it EXCLUDES/BANS anyone. Nor can I find that on ANY material originating from the group. Yes, it says what the group is for.
“The website makes very clear that “Tongues Untied” is not intended for white and/or straight students, posting a disclaimer stating, “For our allies: we do appreciate your voices and commitment to dismantling racism and homophobia; however, please note that this is a space created for LGBTQIA and/or same-gender-loving people of color.”
“Did you know there’s a tiny, obscure student group at the University of Minnesota specifically for LGBT people of color”
“No, you didn’t know that? Because why would you? Because who gives a shit? “
“Tongues Untied even gives a gentle pat on the back to white and straight “allies” saying they “appreciate your voices and commitment to dismantling racism and homophobia.” They just ask that they occasionally have a group where they can meet alone. Is that too much to ask?” hereDid you know there are 1400 student groups at that University? Have you looked at the other 1400 groups to see what they are for, and who these groups are intended for?
Shall I go on?
Love your work Woodie.
:-)
roughbarked said:
The_observer said:
Woodie said:The university itself is choosing neither for or not. There is a group at the university. Why do you hear/read into things that just aren’t there?
“Did you know there’s a tiny, obscure student group at the University of Minnesota specifically for LGBT people of color” here
What is the name of the group, Mr Observer? Do you know?
white people are excluded.
That’s racism.
Oh, I know what your about to say – white people can’t be racially vilified. They can only be racists
Stick to twitter Donald.
so, no one here cares that LGBTQIA white people are being discriminated against.
Oh, can one imagine the outrage if a whites only LGBTQIA group existed, where coloured LGBTQIA were excluded?
Perhaps not. Maybe there’s some LGBTQIA cultural appropriation going on where people think, “hmmmmm, I’m not LGBTQIA so I have no right to judge anything LGBTQIA do to each other”.
Or perhaps it’s the messanger that the problem, not the message, as is so often the case.
The_observer said:
roughbarked said:
The_observer said:white people are excluded.
That’s racism.
Oh, I know what your about to say – white people can’t be racially vilified. They can only be racists
Stick to twitter Donald.
so, no one here cares that LGBTQIA white people are being discriminated against.
Oh, can one imagine the outrage if a whites only LGBTQIA group existed, where coloured LGBTQIA were excluded?
Perhaps not. Maybe there’s some LGBTQIA cultural appropriation going on where people think, “hmmmmm, I’m not LGBTQIA so I have no right to judge anything LGBTQIA do to each other”.
Or perhaps it’s the messanger that the problem, not the message, as is so often the case.
in this instance the messenger is the problem.
I really really hoped people would ignore this thread.
kii said:
I really really hoped people would ignore this thread.
Now there’s a sensible idea.
kii said:
I really really hoped people would ignore this thread.
some people are so desperate for conversation they will talk to anyone. not mentioning any names.
What’s everybody up to today?
Boris said:
Woodie said:
The_observer said:white people are excluded.
That’s racism.
Oh, I know what your about to say – white people can’t be racially vilified. They can only be racists
I’m not about to say any such thing. See…. you have not even researched. It is called “Tongues United” (named after the famous documentary “Tongues Untied” by Marlon Riggs & Essex Hemphill), here and here Nowhere on the Universities website does it say it EXCLUDES/BANS anyone. Nor can I find that on ANY material originating from the group. Yes, it says what the group is for.
“The website makes very clear that “Tongues Untied” is not intended for white and/or straight students, posting a disclaimer stating, “For our allies: we do appreciate your voices and commitment to dismantling racism and homophobia; however, please note that this is a space created for LGBTQIA and/or same-gender-loving people of color.”
“Did you know there’s a tiny, obscure student group at the University of Minnesota specifically for LGBT people of color”
“No, you didn’t know that? Because why would you? Because who gives a shit? “
“Tongues Untied even gives a gentle pat on the back to white and straight “allies” saying they “appreciate your voices and commitment to dismantling racism and homophobia.” They just ask that they occasionally have a group where they can meet alone. Is that too much to ask?” hereDid you know there are 1400 student groups at that University? Have you looked at the other 1400 groups to see what they are for, and who these groups are intended for?
Shall I go on?
Love your work Woodie.
:-)
Yes, the Group was for “colored people exclusively”.
Since the story broke the group has updated its webpage to remove its warning that whites should stay away.
Love your work obsie
roughbarked said:
The_observer said:
roughbarked said:Stick to twitter Donald.
so, no one here cares that LGBTQIA white people are being discriminated against.
Oh, can one imagine the outrage if a whites only LGBTQIA group existed, where coloured LGBTQIA were excluded?
Perhaps not. Maybe there’s some LGBTQIA cultural appropriation going on where people think, “hmmmmm, I’m not LGBTQIA so I have no right to judge anything LGBTQIA do to each other”.
Or perhaps it’s the messanger that the problem, not the message, as is so often the case.
in this instance the messenger is the problem.
always. Its the messanger that matters to you.
kii said:
I really really hoped people would ignore this thread.
Yeh, like you have
LOL
Boris said:
kii said:
I really really hoped people would ignore this thread.
some people are so desperate for conversation they will talk to anyone. not mentioning any names.
the lot of you, who spend all day every day here?
This coloured LGBTQIA group is racist, they have been exposed, & as usual darlings, the lefty collective have come out fighting for their right to discriminate against white people.
The_observer said:
Yes, the Group was for “colored people exclusively”.
Since the story broke the group has updated its webpage to remove its warning that whites should stay away.
Love your work obsie
Evidence or link please? So the concerns have been addressed? So why raise the subject in the first place as if it were still the case?
BTW I cannot (yet) find any reference to Tongues United on the the official “groups” website for the University. here
Perhaps you might like to start your own group, Mr Observer. here to promote your interests and ideals.
The_observer said:
Since the story broke the group has updated its webpage to remove its warning that whites should stay away.
Mr Observer, I’m yet to find an actual webpage for the actual group, as you reference above. Do you have a link? Their Facebook link doesn’t exist/not accessible to me. Perhaps, Mr Observer you might like to contact the group and demand you have access to their Facebook group, just so you can be included.
Also their video here:“https://diversity.umn.edu/gsc/tonguesuntied#Tongues Untied Video” mentions nothing about “ban/exclude” anyone. There’s even a “white” person in it, (of Asian decent).
BTW, nobody has yet picked up my error. It’s “Tongues Untied” not “Tongues United”.
Woodie said:
The_observer said:Since the story broke the group has updated its webpage to remove its warning that whites should stay away.
Mr Observer, I’m yet to find an actual webpage for the actual group, as you reference above. Do you have a link? Their Facebook link doesn’t exist/not accessible to me. Perhaps, Mr Observer you might like to contact the group and demand you have access to their Facebook group, just so you can be included.
Also their video here:“https://diversity.umn.edu/gsc/tonguesuntied#Tongues Untied Video” mentions nothing about “ban/exclude” anyone. There’s even a “white” person in it, (of Asian decent).
BTW, nobody has yet picked up my error. It’s “Tongues Untied” not “Tongues United”.
https://diversity.umn.edu/gsc/tonguesuntied
There isn’t much there. Other page commentary links to the above page though. Like this one
http://alphanewsmn.com/umn-lgbt-group-bans-white-straight-students/
and if you use Wayback Machine
https://web.archive.org/web/20161002232345/https://diversity.umn.edu/gsc//tonguesuntied
doesn’t seem to have changed much. Their FB page is unavailable though.
kii said:
I really really hoped people would ignore this thread.
My apologies, Aunty Kii. But given the current agenda in this country, on marriage equality, I will be addressing mis-information, obscure and irrelevant reasoning, and those that are clutching at straws, so to speak, to justify their attitudes. Although I can only try, in doing my bit for my community’s equality.
When it comes to a debate, even if you are on the same side, some argument can be so easily undone.
I’d like to see Mr Observer placed on a debating team (such as in school, or formal debating club) where he is place on the “yes” side for marriage equality. Formal debates (such as above) you are placed on a “for” or ‘;against” team, regardless of what side you support, and you must come up with arguments for your team.
A challenge for you to accept, Mr Observer? Even though you have your personal opinions, what arguments would you come up with if placed on the “yes” team for marriage equality? Would you accept/refuse to participate?.
Woodie said:
kii said:
I really really hoped people would ignore this thread.
My apologies, Aunty Kii. But given the current agenda in this country, on marriage equality, I will be addressing mis-information, obscure and irrelevant reasoning, and those that are clutching at straws, so to speak, to justify their attitudes. Although I can only try, in doing my bit for my community’s equality.
No need to apologise, Woodie. I agree with addressing misinformation when it is posted. I think I am exhausted by what people post on the intertubes. Seeing too many people trolling in the comments section of news articles.
Good work Woodie, but I personally have given up on The_observer.
Woodie said:
kii said:
I really really hoped people would ignore this thread.
My apologies, Aunty Kii. But given the current agenda in this country, on marriage equality, I will be addressing mis-information, obscure and irrelevant reasoning, and those that are clutching at straws, so to speak, to justify their attitudes. Although I can only try, in doing my bit for my community’s equality.
Ha, funny. This has nothing to do with gay marriage in Australia. You must have an agenda
Bubblecar said:
Good work Woodie, but I personally have given up on The_observer.
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
The_observer said:
Woodie said:
kii said:
I really really hoped people would ignore this thread.
My apologies, Aunty Kii. But given the current agenda in this country, on marriage equality, I will be addressing mis-information, obscure and irrelevant reasoning, and those that are clutching at straws, so to speak, to justify their attitudes. Although I can only try, in doing my bit for my community’s equality.
Ha, funny. This has nothing to do with gay marriage in Australia. You must have an agenda
I haven’t used derogatory language towards, you or insults or “personal attacks”, that YOU have agenda, or your arguments are laughable or “funny”.
I said, Mr Observer I would be doing my best for my community’s equality. That means ALL aspects of my community’s equality with reasoned and informed debate.
Woodie said:
The_observer said:
Woodie said:My apologies, Aunty Kii. But given the current agenda in this country, on marriage equality, I will be addressing mis-information, obscure and irrelevant reasoning, and those that are clutching at straws, so to speak, to justify their attitudes. Although I can only try, in doing my bit for my community’s equality.
Ha, funny. This has nothing to do with gay marriage in Australia. You must have an agenda
I haven’t used derogatory language towards, you or insults or “personal attacks”, that YOU have agenda, or your arguments are laughable or “funny”.
I said, Mr Observer I would be doing my best for my community’s equality. That means ALL aspects of my community’s equality with reasoned and informed debate.
Ah, this thread is about racism. That’s not equality. You are arguing the LGBTQAI group was inclusive. It wasn’t.
The university would not allow a group to exist that targeted white people only. Fact. The toungue twister group was exclusive, to coloured people.
Have a rainbow coloured day :)
The_observer said:
Bubblecar said:
Good work Woodie, but I personally have given up on The_observer.
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
yeh, us nazis are difficult to handle
The_observer said:
The university would not allow a group to exist that targeted white people only. Fact. The toungue twister group was exclusive, to coloured people.
Have a rainbow coloured day :)
Mr Observer, you are very short on evidence. You say “fact”. Where is your evidence the actual University said what you claim as “fact”. Also Please provide evidence where the words excluded, ban, forbid or any other synonym was used by this actual group, either before or after any “revision” to their website (which you are yet to provide a link to).
Woodie said:
The_observer said:The university would not allow a group to exist that targeted white people only. Fact. The toungue twister group was exclusive, to coloured people.
Have a rainbow coloured day :)
Mr Observer, you are very short on evidence. You say “fact”. Where is your evidence the actual University said what you claim as “fact”. Also Please provide evidence where the words excluded, ban, forbid or any other synonym was used by this actual group, either before or after any “revision” to their website (which you are yet to provide a link to).
Mr woodie, you can make up any silly argument you like, the fact is this group identifies as being “for colored people” & white people are not considered “colored” full stop.
“Tongues Untied is a space by and for People of Color who identify as LGBTQIA “
The statement itself is racist because it directly excludes people who are not colored, & that narrows it down to white people.
Any person, white or coloured or indigenous, with the ability to read & comprehend English, who read that statement, could come to no other conclusion than white people were not welcome in their group, just as non LGBTQIA people are not welcome.
Yes Mr woodie, you see I can read their statement & easily come to the conclusion that I would not be welcome, say, because I’m not LGBTQIA, because it states quite clearly that it is a group for LGBTQIA people. I can also easily draw the conclusion that I wouldn’t be welcome because I’m white, due to the fact they state quite clearly that it is a group for colored people only, by the fact that they didn’t include the word “white” just as they didn’t include the words “non LGBTQIA”!
Have a big gay rainbow all inclusive day :)
The_observer said:
Woodie said:
The_observer said:The university would not allow a group to exist that targeted white people only. Fact. The toungue twister group was exclusive, to coloured people.
Have a rainbow coloured day :)
Mr Observer, you are very short on evidence. You say “fact”. Where is your evidence the actual University said what you claim as “fact”. Also Please provide evidence where the words excluded, ban, forbid or any other synonym was used by this actual group, either before or after any “revision” to their website (which you are yet to provide a link to).
Mr woodie, you can make up any silly argument you like, the fact is this group identifies as being “for colored people” & white people are not considered “colored” full stop.
“Tongues Untied is a space by and for People of Color who identify as LGBTQIA “
The statement itself is racist because it directly excludes people who are not colored, & that narrows it down to white people.
Any person, white or coloured or indigenous, with the ability to read & comprehend English, who read that statement, could come to no other conclusion than white people were not welcome in their group, just as non LGBTQIA people are not welcome.
Yes Mr woodie, you see I can read their statement & easily come to the conclusion that I would not be welcome, say, because I’m not LGBTQIA, because it states quite clearly that it is a group for LGBTQIA people. I can also easily draw the conclusion that I wouldn’t be welcome because I’m white, due to the fact they state quite clearly that it is a group for colored people only, by the fact that they didn’t include the word “white” just as they didn’t include the words “non LGBTQIA”!
Have a big gay rainbow all inclusive day :)
Why would you want to join such a group Observer? Are you trying to come out?
Oh, Mr Woodie, I left out the part where, in their original website message they asked for all their “groups allies” to please give them some privacy to “have their meeting alone”.
no whities please
ta taThe_observer said:
Oh, Mr Woodie, I left out the part where, in their original website message they asked for all their “groups allies” to please give them some privacy to “have their meeting alone”.
no whities please
ta ta
I have blue blood. Does that count?
PermeateFree said:
The_observer said:
Woodie said:Mr Observer, you are very short on evidence. You say “fact”. Where is your evidence the actual University said what you claim as “fact”. Also Please provide evidence where the words excluded, ban, forbid or any other synonym was used by this actual group, either before or after any “revision” to their website (which you are yet to provide a link to).
Mr woodie, you can make up any silly argument you like, the fact is this group identifies as being “for colored people” & white people are not considered “colored” full stop.
“Tongues Untied is a space by and for People of Color who identify as LGBTQIA “
The statement itself is racist because it directly excludes people who are not colored, & that narrows it down to white people.
Any person, white or coloured or indigenous, with the ability to read & comprehend English, who read that statement, could come to no other conclusion than white people were not welcome in their group, just as non LGBTQIA people are not welcome.
Yes Mr woodie, you see I can read their statement & easily come to the conclusion that I would not be welcome, say, because I’m not LGBTQIA, because it states quite clearly that it is a group for LGBTQIA people. I can also easily draw the conclusion that I wouldn’t be welcome because I’m white, due to the fact they state quite clearly that it is a group for colored people only, by the fact that they didn’t include the word “white” just as they didn’t include the words “non LGBTQIA”!
Have a big gay rainbow all inclusive day :)
Why would you want to join such a group Observer? Are you trying to come out?
Oh, I wouldn’t want to join such a racist group as theirs pf. And to think the university let them get away with such offensive behaviour darling.
Tamb said:
The_observer said:Oh, Mr Woodie, I left out the part where, in their original website message they asked for all their “groups allies” to please give them some privacy to “have their meeting alone”.
no whities please
ta taI have blue blood. Does that count?
Tamb, you can join my group any day sweetheart. Obseys Making Things Right Again
The_observer said:
PermeateFree said:
The_observer said:Mr woodie, you can make up any silly argument you like, the fact is this group identifies as being “for colored people” & white people are not considered “colored” full stop.
“Tongues Untied is a space by and for People of Color who identify as LGBTQIA “
The statement itself is racist because it directly excludes people who are not colored, & that narrows it down to white people.
Any person, white or coloured or indigenous, with the ability to read & comprehend English, who read that statement, could come to no other conclusion than white people were not welcome in their group, just as non LGBTQIA people are not welcome.
Yes Mr woodie, you see I can read their statement & easily come to the conclusion that I would not be welcome, say, because I’m not LGBTQIA, because it states quite clearly that it is a group for LGBTQIA people. I can also easily draw the conclusion that I wouldn’t be welcome because I’m white, due to the fact they state quite clearly that it is a group for colored people only, by the fact that they didn’t include the word “white” just as they didn’t include the words “non LGBTQIA”!
Have a big gay rainbow all inclusive day :)
Why would you want to join such a group Observer? Are you trying to come out?
Oh, I wouldn’t want to join such a racist group as theirs pf. And to think the university let them get away with such offensive behaviour darling.
But could they join your nazi party?
The_observer said:
Tamb said:
The_observer said:Oh, Mr Woodie, I left out the part where, in their original website message they asked for all their “groups allies” to please give them some privacy to “have their meeting alone”.
no whities please
ta taI have blue blood. Does that count?
Tamb, you can join my group any day sweetheart. Obseys Making Things Right Again
Sweetheart, darling, etc. Are you sure you are not telling us something Observer?
PermeateFree said:
The_observer said:
PermeateFree said:Why would you want to join such a group Observer? Are you trying to come out?
Oh, I wouldn’t want to join such a racist group as theirs pf. And to think the university let them get away with such offensive behaviour darling.
But could they join your nazi party?
Now now pf darling, you’re the one who hates all people who disagree with you. Heil William
The_observer said:
PermeateFree said:
The_observer said:Oh, I wouldn’t want to join such a racist group as theirs pf. And to think the university let them get away with such offensive behaviour darling.
But could they join your nazi party?
Now now pf darling, you’re the one who hates all people who disagree with you. Heil William
I don’t let anyone join my party, so am not racist to any group.
PermeateFree said:
The_observer said:
PermeateFree said:But could they join your nazi party?
Now now pf darling, you’re the one who hates all people who disagree with you. Heil William
I don’t let anyone join my party, so am not racist to any group.
I’m not racist darling, but don’t let a little thingy like that stop you calling me names, troll dear
The_observer said:
PermeateFree said:
The_observer said:Now now pf darling, you’re the one who hates all people who disagree with you. Heil William
I don’t let anyone join my party, so am not racist to any group.
I’m not racist darling, but don’t let a little thingy like that stop you calling me names, troll dear
Where have I called you a name? I think you protest too much Observer. Just what are you hiding?
The_observer said:
Tamb said:
The_observer said:Oh, Mr Woodie, I left out the part where, in their original website message they asked for all their “groups allies” to please give them some privacy to “have their meeting alone”.
no whities please
ta taI have blue blood. Does that count?
Tamb, you can join my group any day sweetheart. Obseys Making Things Right Again
I feel liberated already.
Tamb said:
The_observer said:
Tamb said:I have blue blood. Does that count?
Tamb, you can join my group any day sweetheart. Obseys Making Things Right Again
I feel liberated already.
well, so you should. The only people not welcome at my groups meetings are those nasty violent lefty protesters with all their self loathing & hatred.
The_observer said:
Tamb said:
The_observer said:Tamb, you can join my group any day sweetheart. Obseys Making Things Right Again
I feel liberated already.
well, so you should. The only people not welcome at my groups meetings are those nasty violent lefty protesters with all their self loathing & hatred.
thinks Almost time for the putsch. I need a beer hall.
I think the Observer should just go up to this group, bow the head and say “I need love!”
The_observer said:
Mr woodie, you can make up any silly argument you like, the fact is this group identifies as being “for colored people” & white people are not considered “colored” full stop.
“Tongues Untied is a space by and for People of Color who identify as LGBTQIA “
The statement itself is racist because it directly excludes people who are not colored, & that narrows it down to white people.
Any person, white or coloured or indigenous, with the ability to read & comprehend English, who read that statement, could come to no other conclusion than white people were not welcome in their group, just as non LGBTQIA people are not welcome.
Yes Mr woodie, you see I can read their statement & easily come to the conclusion that I would not be welcome, say, because I’m not LGBTQIA, because it states quite clearly that it is a group for LGBTQIA people. I can also easily draw the conclusion that I wouldn’t be welcome because I’m white, due to the fact they state quite clearly that it is a group for colored people only, by the fact that they didn’t include the word “white” just as they didn’t include the words “non LGBTQIA”!
Firstly, and with respect, and I note you are yet to do so, (but I note you have referred to others, and it is up to them whether they accept it or not), but if you are considering it, I ask that you do not call, or refer to me as “darling”. You have no implied or explicit permission from me to do so.
Nextly,
The only actual statement that can be found originating from the actual group is “They just ask that they occasionally have a group where they can meet alone. Is that too much to ask?” That is asking for a little respect and privacy, as I’m sure you would do, with items/discussion and things that are personal to you. A women’s group convened to discuss and support private and personal issues to them would ask the same. Or “Men’s Sheds” which are, and I quote “Members of Men’s Sheds come from all walks of life – the bond that unites them is that THEY ARE MEN with time on their hands and they would like something meaningful to do with that time.” Please check their website. here Not a woman in sight. It is about men, for men, by men. So, in your opinion, what does that make “Men’s Shed”?
Nextly I trust your “ ability to read & comprehend English” includes usage of words in their correct context. The word “racism” or “racist”, and as reluctant as I am to use it, the dictionary definition. I see nothing in the dictionary definition about “exclusion”, but rather the consideration that one group/race is “superior” or “inferior” to another. There is no claim that comes even close by that group that they are superior or, even inferior.
**Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior.
‘a programme to combat racism’
More example sentencesSynonyms
1.1 The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.**
Perhaps you might like to demonstrate your ability to read an comprehend English, and select another word to convey your opinion, as “racist” does not quite fit the evidence.(even your own)
Nextly, I asked of you a number of questions previously in my contribution to your thread, which you are yet to respond. Courtesy and respect would see you respond accordingly.
You: Since the story broke the group has updated its webpage to remove its warning that whites should stay away.
Me: Evidence or link please?
Me: I’d like to see Mr Observer placed on a debating team (such as in school, or formal debating club) where he is place on the “yes” side for marriage equality. Formal debates (such as above) you are placed on a “for” or ‘;against” team, regardless of what side you support, and you must come up with arguments for your team. A challenge for you to accept, Mr Observer? Even though you have your personal opinions, what arguments would you come up with if placed on the “yes” team for marriage equality? Would you accept/refuse to participate?.
May you have a great evening and good week.
Don’t waste your time Woodie, he is a parrot.
Woodie said:
The_observer said:Mr woodie, you can make up any silly argument you like, the fact is this group identifies as being “for colored people” & white people are not considered “colored” full stop.
“Tongues Untied is a space by and for People of Color who identify as LGBTQIA “
The statement itself is racist because it directly excludes people who are not colored, & that narrows it down to white people.
Any person, white or coloured or indigenous, with the ability to read & comprehend English, who read that statement, could come to no other conclusion than white people were not welcome in their group, just as non LGBTQIA people are not welcome.
Yes Mr woodie, you see I can read their statement & easily come to the conclusion that I would not be welcome, say, because I’m not LGBTQIA, because it states quite clearly that it is a group for LGBTQIA people. I can also easily draw the conclusion that I wouldn’t be welcome because I’m white, due to the fact they state quite clearly that it is a group for colored people only, by the fact that they didn’t include the word “white” just as they didn’t include the words “non LGBTQIA”!
Firstly, and with respect, and I note you are yet to do so, (but I note you have referred to others, and it is up to them whether they accept it or not), but if you are considering it, I ask that you do not call, or refer to me as “darling”. You have no implied or explicit permission from me to do so.
Nextly,
The only actual statement that can be found originating from the actual group is “They just ask that they occasionally have a group where they can meet alone. Is that too much to ask?” That is asking for a little respect and privacy, as I’m sure you would do, with items/discussion and things that are personal to you. A women’s group convened to discuss and support private and personal issues to them would ask the same. Or “Men’s Sheds” which are, and I quote “Members of Men’s Sheds come from all walks of life – the bond that unites them is that THEY ARE MEN with time on their hands and they would like something meaningful to do with that time.” Please check their website. here Not a woman in sight. It is about men, for men, by men. So, in your opinion, what does that make “Men’s Shed”?
Nextly I trust your “ ability to read & comprehend English” includes usage of words in their correct context. The word “racism” or “racist”, and as reluctant as I am to use it, the dictionary definition. I see nothing in the dictionary definition about “exclusion”, but rather the consideration that one group/race is “superior” or “inferior” to another. There is no claim that comes even close by that group that they are superior or, even inferior.
**Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior.
‘a programme to combat racism’
More example sentencesSynonyms
1.1 The belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races.**Perhaps you might like to demonstrate your ability to read an comprehend English, and select another word to convey your opinion, as “racist” does not quite fit the evidence.(even your own)
Nextly, I asked of you a number of questions previously in my contribution to your thread, which you are yet to respond. Courtesy and respect would see you respond accordingly.
You: Since the story broke the group has updated its webpage to remove its warning that whites should stay away.
Me: Evidence or link please?Me: I’d like to see Mr Observer placed on a debating team (such as in school, or formal debating club) where he is place on the “yes” side for marriage equality. Formal debates (such as above) you are placed on a “for” or ‘;against” team, regardless of what side you support, and you must come up with arguments for your team. A challenge for you to accept, Mr Observer? Even though you have your personal opinions, what arguments would you come up with if placed on the “yes” team for marriage equality? Would you accept/refuse to participate?.
May you have a great evening and good week.
Wow, that sure was a long post sweetheart Too long yo read.
party_pants said:
Don’t waste your time Woodie, he is a parrot.
Mmm. You can’t argue with a copy-and-paste from the Stormfront website.
The_observer said:
Wow, that sure was a long post sweetheart Too long yo read.
I also respectfully ask that you do not refer to me as “sweetheart”.
dv said:
party_pants said:
Don’t waste your time Woodie, he is a parrot.
Mmm. You can’t argue with a copy-and-paste from the Stormfront website.
Lol, no cut n paste& i don’t know stormfront.
You’re the one who follows the lefty bible word for word dv. And you judge the truth not by the facts, but by whose telling the story.
Woodie said:
The_observer said:Wow, that sure was a long post sweetheart Too long yo read.
I also respectfully ask that you do not refer to me as “sweetheart”.
Ok smoochy
dv said:
party_pants said:
Don’t waste your time Woodie, he is a parrot.
Mmm. You can’t argue with a copy-and-paste from the Stormfront website.
LOL, stormfront, it that still a thing? I’ve read a few of their threads. Gawd, an education wouldn’t hurt a few of them.
The_observer said:
Woodie said:
The_observer said:Wow, that sure was a long post sweetheart Too long yo read.
I also respectfully ask that you do not refer to me as “sweetheart”.
Ok smoochy
I have shown you nothing but respect in your thread, Mr Observer, and only addressed the topic, and not the person. It does say a lot about you, as a person, if you are unable to return that respect.
Woodie said:
The_observer said:
Woodie said:I also respectfully ask that you do not refer to me as “sweetheart”.
Ok smoochy
I have shown you nothing but respect in your thread, Mr Observer, and only addressed the topic, and not the person. It does say a lot about you, as a person, if you are unable to return that respect.
He can’t answer you Woodie because he just makes stuff up, he is a liar, and so can’t give you any references.
Boris said:
dv said:
party_pants said:
Don’t waste your time Woodie, he is a parrot.
Mmm. You can’t argue with a copy-and-paste from the Stormfront website.
LOL, stormfront, it that still a thing? I’ve read a few of their threads. Gawd, an education wouldn’t hurt a few of them.
Or maybe it would and that’s the problem
Woodie said:
The_observer said:
Woodie said:I also respectfully ask that you do not refer to me as “sweetheart”.
Ok smoochy
I have shown you nothing but respect in your thread, Mr Observer, and only addressed the topic, and not the person. It does say a lot about you, as a person, if you are unable to return that respect.
No, you’ ve been smug & keep refering to gay marriage in australia. Besides not recognising racism, you keep going off topic
Boris said:
Woodie said:
The_observer said:Ok smoochy
I have shown you nothing but respect in your thread, Mr Observer, and only addressed the topic, and not the person. It does say a lot about you, as a person, if you are unable to return that respect.
He can’t answer you Woodie because he just makes stuff up, he is a liar, and so can’t give you any references.
I don’t know what references are needed. They said they don’t want white people at their colored only meetings. Thats racist.
dv said:
party_pants said:
Don’t waste your time Woodie, he is a parrot.
Mmm. You can’t argue with a copy-and-paste from the Stormfront website.
Oh. That explains the varying degrees of bad spelling.
The_observer said:
Woodie said:
The_observer said:Ok smoochy
I have shown you nothing but respect in your thread, Mr Observer, and only addressed the topic, and not the person. It does say a lot about you, as a person, if you are unable to return that respect.
No, you’ ve been smug & keep refering to gay marriage in australia. Besides not recognising racism, you keep going off topic
Keep referring to? in my posts, once, and that was directed at Kii, and once again, when I challenged you to a debate situation. I did not use gay marriage in any of my evidence or arguments re your thread topic and subject, either actually or by analogy.
Woodie said:
The_observer said:
Woodie said:I have shown you nothing but respect in your thread, Mr Observer, and only addressed the topic, and not the person. It does say a lot about you, as a person, if you are unable to return that respect.
No, you’ ve been smug & keep refering to gay marriage in australia. Besides not recognising racism, you keep going off topic
Keep referring to? in my posts, once, and that was directed at Kii, and once again, when I challenged you to a debate situation. I did not use gay marriage in any of my evidence or arguments re your thread topic and subject, either actually or by analogy.
LOL, T_o can’t even keep on track in his own thread. Sad.
:-)
Boris said:
Woodie said:
The_observer said:No, you’ ve been smug & keep refering to gay marriage in australia. Besides not recognising racism, you keep going off topic
Keep referring to? in my posts, once, and that was directed at Kii, and once again, when I challenged you to a debate situation. I did not use gay marriage in any of my evidence or arguments re your thread topic and subject, either actually or by analogy.
LOL, T_o can’t even keep on track in his own thread. Sad.
:-)
Devon sandwiches for dinner tonight ctusty?
Boris said:
LOL, T_o can’t even keep on track in his own thread. Sad.
:-)
He says some of it is too long to read too. .
