Date: 24/09/2017 00:49:59
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1122600
Subject: Scientists Just Sequenced An 18 Million Year Old Species That Cloned Itself

Scientists Just Sequenced An 18 Million Year Old Species That Cloned Itself

Researchers have sequenced a tiny, asexual, 18 million-year-old worm species that has survived without sexual reproduction by cloning itself. This could provide insight into how humans could someday create clones that survive for generations.

more…

Reply Quote

Date: 24/09/2017 00:54:03
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1122605
Subject: re: Scientists Just Sequenced An 18 Million Year Old Species That Cloned Itself

Tau.Neutrino said:


Scientists Just Sequenced An 18 Million Year Old Species That Cloned Itself

Researchers have sequenced a tiny, asexual, 18 million-year-old worm species that has survived without sexual reproduction by cloning itself. This could provide insight into how humans could someday create clones that survive for generations.

more…

Interesting.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/09/2017 01:10:04
From: btm
ID: 1122620
Subject: re: Scientists Just Sequenced An 18 Million Year Old Species That Cloned Itself

A common starfish, Coscinasterias calimaria, can reproduce sexually, but can also reproduce by fission: it simply pulls parts of its body apart until it breaks into two or more pieces, which develop into individual starfish. Commercial fishermen, ignorant of the animal’s reproductive biology, would, on pulling them up in their nets, often break them into pieces and throw them back into the water — then complain that they were in plague proportions, particularly in Port Phillip Bay.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/09/2017 01:12:32
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1122622
Subject: re: Scientists Just Sequenced An 18 Million Year Old Species That Cloned Itself

btm said:


A common starfish, Coscinasterias calimaria, can reproduce sexually, but can also reproduce by fission: it simply pulls parts of its body apart until it breaks into two or more pieces, which develop into individual starfish. Commercial fishermen, ignorant of the animal’s reproductive biology, would, on pulling them up in their nets, often break them into pieces and throw them back into the water — then complain that they were in plague proportions, particularly in Port Phillip Bay.

Heh.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/09/2017 01:16:31
From: PermeateFree
ID: 1122626
Subject: re: Scientists Just Sequenced An 18 Million Year Old Species That Cloned Itself

btm said:


A common starfish, Coscinasterias calimaria, can reproduce sexually, but can also reproduce by fission: it simply pulls parts of its body apart until it breaks into two or more pieces, which develop into individual starfish. Commercial fishermen, ignorant of the animal’s reproductive biology, would, on pulling them up in their nets, often break them into pieces and throw them back into the water — then complain that they were in plague proportions, particularly in Port Phillip Bay.

There are many plants and animals that can reproduce asexually, but they usually have a backup that permits them to also reproduce sexually, although that being a lesser form of reproduction.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/09/2017 07:40:45
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1122661
Subject: re: Scientists Just Sequenced An 18 Million Year Old Species That Cloned Itself

Sexual reproduction is very over-rated?

There are many other ways to reproduce.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/09/2017 10:03:31
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1122680
Subject: re: Scientists Just Sequenced An 18 Million Year Old Species That Cloned Itself

mollwollfumble said:


Sexual reproduction is very over-rated?

There are many other ways to reproduce.

Oh ah ee oo there’s absolutely no strife Living the timeless life I don’t need a wife Living the timeless life If I need a friend I just give a wriggle Split right down the middle And when I look there’s two of me Both as handsome as can be Oh here we go slithering, here we go slithering and squelching on Oh here we go slithering, here we go slithering and squelching on Oh ah ee oo there’s absolutely no strife Living the timeless life

Reply Quote