mollwollfumble said:
Rule 303 said:
I’m working on developing a flog self-check tool and need suggestions for things that flogs do that would help them self-identify. I’m thinking:
Start sentences with ‘So…’
Use the words like ‘space’, ‘learnings’, ‘in relation to’, and ‘leverage’ a lot.
Have a job title that sounds like they made it up themselves.
…?
Any suggestions from your experience of flogs would be much appreciated.
For those who might be unfamiliar with flogs: Flog defined
Don’t know “flog” in this context.
Perhaps you should rephrase the original question using “jerk”. Not “wanker” because that’s a bit different.
But in relation to Mollwoll’s point, surely a flog is different to both a jerk and a wanker.
As I see it:
A jerk tries to assert his coolness with assertive petit unpleasantness to those he considers less cool.
A wanker tries to assert his coolness by trying to imitate those he considers more cool (and fails).
A flog (it seems) tries to assert his coolness by using language he considers to be that of intellectuals, not realising it marks him as the opposite.
Apologies for the gender stereotyping of these terms.
Also interesting that the masturbation link is still alive and well in words intended to ridicule.
Time we got over that I think.