Date: 9/03/2018 18:52:23
From: Michael V
ID: 1197436
Subject: Second Test in SA.
Blog here:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-09/south-africa-v-australia-second-test-in-port-elizabeth-day-1/9531936
Radio broadcast probably here:
http://www.abc.net.au/radio/player/?station=itinerant_three
Lets hope Warner can use his temper to score some good runs.
Date: 9/03/2018 18:57:58
From: Michael V
ID: 1197440
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Steve Smith won the toss and elected to bat.
Date: 9/03/2018 19:13:48
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1197450
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Michael V said:
Steve Smith won the toss and elected to bat.
rubs hands
Date: 9/03/2018 19:17:51
From: Stumpy_seahorse
ID: 1197452
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Peak Warming Man said:
Michael V said:
Steve Smith won the toss and elected to bat. sledge
rubs hands
Australia chose to target partners this match, while SA has chosen family members and IQ…
They’ve both agreed that kids are fair game for both sides…
Date: 9/03/2018 20:25:27
From: sibeen
ID: 1197493
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Warner obviously decided he was going to go out and play a steady innings. One where he played the game like a traditional opening batsman. One where there could be no slur on his technique nor his character.
He carried it on for about 13 overs and then Bancroft foolishly nudged at a ball that went for four. The first hours play was complete, 14 overs had been bowled, Australia was on 23 and Warner was on 8.
At that point Warner thought “fuck it”.
End of over 18, Australia 67, Warner 34 :)
Date: 9/03/2018 20:26:43
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1197496
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
Warner obviously decided he was going to go out and play a steady innings. One where he played the game like a traditional opening batsman. One where there could be no slur on his technique nor his character.
He carried it on for about 13 overs and then Bancroft foolishly nudged at a ball that went for four. The first hours play was complete, 14 overs had been bowled, Australia was on 23 and Warner was on 8.
At that point Warner thought “fuck it”.
End of over 18, Australia 67, Warner 34 :)
LOL
Date: 9/03/2018 20:59:23
From: sibeen
ID: 1197521
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 9/03/2018 22:04:44
From: party_pants
ID: 1197532
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Khawaja out cheaply once again. Having a bit of a lean trot.
Date: 9/03/2018 22:20:45
From: party_pants
ID: 1197547
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 9/03/2018 23:21:01
From: sibeen
ID: 1197576
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 9/03/2018 23:22:18
From: sibeen
ID: 1197577
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 9/03/2018 23:23:10
From: sibeen
ID: 1197579
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
Now an LBW review.
…and a stupid review at that.
Date: 9/03/2018 23:27:25
From: sibeen
ID: 1197583
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 9/03/2018 23:29:30
From: Michael V
ID: 1197585
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
FUCK
I’d wash your mouth out with soap, but then I’d get the sack and be charged, so I won’t…
Date: 9/03/2018 23:36:18
From: Michael V
ID: 1197595
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Michael V said:
sibeen said:
FUCK
I’d wash your mouth out with soap, but then I’d get the sack and be charged, so I won’t…
Watch it…
Date: 9/03/2018 23:38:13
From: party_pants
ID: 1197597
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Another good start petters out. In some trouble now.
Date: 9/03/2018 23:38:41
From: sibeen
ID: 1197598
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
FUCK
Sorry for the delay, my internet went down.
Date: 9/03/2018 23:40:20
From: Michael V
ID: 1197600
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 9/03/2018 23:40:37
From: sibeen
ID: 1197602
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 9/03/2018 23:42:50
From: party_pants
ID: 1197606
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Oh dear, this is not looking good now.
I blame Khawaja.
Date: 10/03/2018 00:00:38
From: Michael V
ID: 1197617
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 10/03/2018 00:00:50
From: sibeen
ID: 1197618
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 10/03/2018 00:03:04
From: party_pants
ID: 1197621
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
I like not this scorecard.
Bring me a different scorecard!
Date: 10/03/2018 00:03:04
From: sibeen
ID: 1197622
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Rabada just went from 1/63 – very average figures to 4/67 in the same over.
FUCK
Date: 10/03/2018 00:12:25
From: sibeen
ID: 1197628
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
That pitch is doing some weird shit (sorry for the profanity).
Date: 10/03/2018 00:21:01
From: sibeen
ID: 1197636
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
I SHALL SAY FUCK ONCE MORE
Date: 10/03/2018 00:21:52
From: Bogsnorkler
ID: 1197637
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
I SHALL SAY FUCK ONCE MORE
live the dream, sibeen. live the dream.
Date: 10/03/2018 00:48:24
From: sibeen
ID: 1197643
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 10/03/2018 00:49:34
From: party_pants
ID: 1197644
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
doenm’t look like we’ll get to 300.
Date: 10/03/2018 01:03:06
From: Michael V
ID: 1197648
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
party_pants said:
doenm’t look like we’ll get to 300.
Ha!
Well spotted.
Date: 10/03/2018 01:07:31
From: party_pants
ID: 1197650
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Michael V said:
party_pants said:
doenm’t look like we’ll get to 300.
Ha!
Well spotted.
I’m very perceptive
Date: 10/03/2018 01:11:18
From: Michael V
ID: 1197651
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
party_pants said:
Michael V said:
party_pants said:
doesn’t look like we’ll get to 300.
Ha!
Well spotted.
I’m very perceptive
Now that’s plainly obvious!
Cricket Pundit, I’d reckon.
;)
Date: 10/03/2018 01:28:04
From: Michael V
ID: 1197655
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Mr perceptive: all out for 243.
Date: 10/03/2018 01:28:15
From: sibeen
ID: 1197656
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 10/03/2018 01:31:00
From: party_pants
ID: 1197658
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
let’s get them all out for 42 and enforce the follow-on!
Date: 10/03/2018 01:32:42
From: Michael V
ID: 1197659
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
party_pants said:
let’s get them all out for 42 and enforce the follow-on!
Answer to the question!
Date: 10/03/2018 01:52:54
From: Ian
ID: 1197665
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
243? What’s going on? Openers got a few and then it went downhill. Fu…?………ck!
Oh well, see what the Sith make of the conditions.
Date: 10/03/2018 02:11:54
From: sibeen
ID: 1197669
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 10/03/2018 02:13:34
From: sibeen
ID: 1197670
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
FUCK OFF
Although looking at the replay I perhaps would have reviewed. That also may be a camera angle.
Date: 10/03/2018 02:22:09
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1197671
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
sibeen said:
FUCK OFF
Although looking at the replay I perhaps would have reviewed. That also may be a camera angle.
Good to hear a small voice for justice, however muted.
Date: 10/03/2018 02:23:38
From: sibeen
ID: 1197672
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Bubblecar said:
sibeen said:
sibeen said:
FUCK OFF
Although looking at the replay I perhaps would have reviewed. That also may be a camera angle.
Good to hear a small voice for justice, however muted.
Oh, it was a small moment of weakness. Believe me I would have still told him to FUCK OFF
:)
Date: 10/03/2018 03:14:15
From: Ian
ID: 1197675
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
STUMPS
South Africa 1-39 (Rabada 17*, Elgar 11*) trails Australia by 204 runs
Rabada has become the highest scorer as well as the leading wicket taker of the day for the Sith.
Date: 10/03/2018 09:18:35
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1197697
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Second Test.
Date: 10/03/2018 19:06:27
From: Michael V
ID: 1197918
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Bump.
SA 1/39 in reply to Australia’s first innings total of 243 runs.
———————————————
Blog here:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-10/south-africa-v-australia-second-test-port-elizabeth-day-two-live/9535462
Internet live broadcast radio here:
http://www.abc.net.au/radio/player/?station=itinerant_three
Live scoreboard here:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/sport/cricket/results/?season=2016,2017,2018&competition=1983&match=41569
Date: 10/03/2018 19:39:38
From: sibeen
ID: 1197945
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 10/03/2018 19:53:42
From: sibeen
ID: 1197952
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 10/03/2018 19:54:46
From: sibeen
ID: 1197953
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
FUCK OFF
BUGGER
Date: 10/03/2018 19:56:39
From: party_pants
ID: 1197955
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
they seem to have avoided the follow-on :(
Date: 10/03/2018 22:07:21
From: party_pants
ID: 1198000
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Stop pissing about and get some wickets…. FFS!
Date: 10/03/2018 22:17:15
From: Ian
ID: 1198002
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
party_pants said:
Stop pissing about and get some wickets…. FFS!
Steady, steady. The important thing is that the oompah band has shut up.
Date: 11/03/2018 00:03:45
From: sibeen
ID: 1198024
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 00:13:28
From: sibeen
ID: 1198031
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 00:30:51
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1198035
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 00:34:13
From: party_pants
ID: 1198037
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 00:47:03
From: Bubblecar
ID: 1198042
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
party_pants said:
getting better
How would you rate TV cricket compared with say, the Tour de France?
Date: 11/03/2018 00:49:13
From: sibeen
ID: 1198045
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 00:51:48
From: party_pants
ID: 1198047
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Bubblecar said:
party_pants said:
getting better
How would you rate TV cricket compared with say, the Tour de France?
I’m not actually watching it on TV because I don’t like to pay Rupert money, just following it online.
I like both. Sometimes test cricket is boring, at other times it is really tense and absorbing and just draws you in like you can’t turn away. But there is no scenery for distraction during the boring bits.
Date: 11/03/2018 00:53:38
From: sibeen
ID: 1198048
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 01:05:32
From: sibeen
ID: 1198054
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 01:45:19
From: sibeen
ID: 1198069
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 02:21:36
From: Michael V
ID: 1198101
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 02:22:11
From: Michael V
ID: 1198103
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 02:33:26
From: Michael V
ID: 1198112
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Stumps.
SA 7/263 in reply to Australia’s 243.
Date: 11/03/2018 20:03:07
From: sibeen
ID: 1198258
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 20:37:41
From: sibeen
ID: 1198265
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 20:54:12
From: sibeen
ID: 1198271
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
FUCK OFF
Yarpies finally all out for 382, a lead of 139.
Fuck
Date: 11/03/2018 20:55:59
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1198274
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
FUCK OFF
Yarpies finally all out for 382, a lead of 139.
Fuck
Yeah, but, it’s only South Africa.
Date: 11/03/2018 20:57:52
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1198277
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
And, it’s in Adelaide.
How important could it be?
Date: 11/03/2018 20:59:08
From: sibeen
ID: 1198279
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
captain_spalding said:
And, it’s in Adelaide.
How important could it be?
ROFL :)
Date: 11/03/2018 22:19:08
From: sibeen
ID: 1198290
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 22:24:51
From: party_pants
ID: 1198291
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
not fair, they shouldn’t be allowed to play Rabada.
Date: 11/03/2018 23:11:27
From: sibeen
ID: 1198295
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 11/03/2018 23:32:59
From: sibeen
ID: 1198297
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
JESUS H FUCKING CHRIST ON CRUTCHES
Date: 12/03/2018 00:05:31
From: sibeen
ID: 1198305
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
OH THIS IS JUST FUCKING EMBARRASSING
Date: 12/03/2018 00:06:07
From: party_pants
ID: 1198306
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Goodness is not a word to describe this
Date: 12/03/2018 00:56:04
From: sibeen
ID: 1198310
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
IT’S GOTTEN FUCKING WORSE
Khawaja has made a 50.
Date: 12/03/2018 01:09:13
From: party_pants
ID: 1198311
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
IT’S GOTTEN FUCKING WORSE
Khawaja has made a 50.
No, no – that’s good.
Date: 12/03/2018 01:15:13
From: sibeen
ID: 1198312
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
party_pants said:
sibeen said:
IT’S GOTTEN FUCKING WORSE
Khawaja has made a 50.
No, no – that’s good.
sigh
He cements his place in the team. He made one really decent score in the recent Ashes, and that was in the last test when it was already done and dusted.
OK, if he repeats that score here I’ll give him a pass :)
Date: 12/03/2018 01:43:55
From: Ian
ID: 1198314
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Khawaja and Marsh put Oz into lead.. Oh yeah!
Date: 12/03/2018 02:24:50
From: sibeen
ID: 1198316
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
FUCK
I suspect that’s it.
Date: 12/03/2018 02:41:37
From: Ian
ID: 1198317
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
11 minutes more..
STUMPS
Australia 5-180 (M Marsh 39*, Paine 5*) leads South Africa by 41 runs
Date: 12/03/2018 19:07:39
From: Michael V
ID: 1198481
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 19:09:03
From: sibeen
ID: 1198482
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 19:10:47
From: Ian
ID: 1198483
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
FUCK
Oh well..
We just need Paine and the tail to knock up 150
Date: 12/03/2018 19:14:38
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1198484
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
We will fight them on the pitches and in the stands, we will fight them in the tunnel, we will never surrender.
Date: 12/03/2018 19:25:10
From: Michael V
ID: 1198486
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 19:26:13
From: sibeen
ID: 1198487
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 19:26:37
From: party_pants
ID: 1198488
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Even a draw looks light-years away now.
Date: 12/03/2018 19:32:36
From: Michael V
ID: 1198489
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
party_pants said:
Even a draw looks light-years away now.
Unfortunately.
Date: 12/03/2018 19:37:24
From: sibeen
ID: 1198493
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 19:52:37
From: sibeen
ID: 1198501
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 20:25:12
From: Ian
ID: 1198513
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 20:28:42
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1198515
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
I’m predicting that SA wont get many more than 102 in their second innings.
We’ll see how right or wrong I am in the fullness of time.
Date: 12/03/2018 20:36:02
From: party_pants
ID: 1198516
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Peak Warming Man said:
I’m predicting that SA wont get many more than 102 in their second innings.
We’ll see how right or wrong I am in the fullness of time.
I’d say 105 absolute maximum.
Date: 12/03/2018 20:59:55
From: sibeen
ID: 1198529
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 21:55:45
From: sibeen
ID: 1198546
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 22:31:52
From: sibeen
ID: 1198561
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
OK, we’ve lulled them into a false sense of security, now it is time to go for the jungular.
Date: 12/03/2018 22:39:45
From: sibeen
ID: 1198564
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 22:40:02
From: sibeen
ID: 1198565
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 22:53:47
From: sibeen
ID: 1198574
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 22:54:30
From: party_pants
ID: 1198575
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 12/03/2018 22:54:51
From: roughbarked
ID: 1198576
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
FUCK
Nothing was meant to be easy.
Date: 12/03/2018 23:18:17
From: tauto
ID: 1198580
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
FUCK
—-
First test to Starc, second test to Rabada.
Date: 13/03/2018 19:08:41
From: sibeen
ID: 1198864
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
Date: 13/03/2018 20:35:46
From: captain_spalding
ID: 1198884
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
sibeen said:
FUCK – No Cricket
I think you’re the only (non-‘journalist’) person in Australia who was paying any attention to it.
Date: 13/03/2018 20:42:22
From: party_pants
ID: 1198885
Subject: re: Second Test in SA.
captain_spalding said:
sibeen said:
FUCK – No Cricket
I think you’re the only (non-‘journalist’) person in Australia who was paying any attention to it.
Mr V was interested in it.
