mollwollfumble said:
transition said:
Q I guess, quality factor that keeps it ringing a little bit, related springiness, and not sure about many plastics qualifying, into mid audio to higher frequencies anyway, and there’d be temperature drift too, resonance shift, given how plastics soften with heat.
thinking
High Q rules out 3-D printing for starters.
I can live with temperature drift and resonance shift. Perhaps curing it in the oven before first use might temper it.
I’m not even sure if I want thermoplastics or thermosets, and that’s about as basic a question as you can get when it comes to plastics. Thermosets have higher melting points. I did find this website. I can immediately discard anything with an attenuation greater than 10 dB/cm.
http://www.ndt.net/links/proper.htm
That suggests possibly one of polystyrene, polyethylene or nylon.
Rejecting ABS, polycarbonate, PETG, vinyl, Styrene Butadiene and possibly PVC.
But that website knows nothing about polyester, polyurethane, viscose, PET and epoxy, for starters.
I can’t rely on strength as a guide to good acoustics, nylon can contain vesicles of liquid lubricant that would interfere with acoustics.
There’s this website, gives attenuation of a large number of materials in neper/metre. Divide by 11.5 to get dB/cm. (Is that correct?)
http://www.kayelaby.npl.co.uk/general_physics/2_4/2_4_1.html
Material, dB/cm
Butyl rubber/carbon (100/40), 11.6
Cellulose acetate butyrate, 9.0
Crown glass, 0.17
Neoprene, 20
Nylon, 1.13
Perspex, 5.0
Polycarbonate, 21
Polyethylene, 9 to 26
Polyethylene terephthalate (Mylar), 175
Polystyrene, 2.0
Polyvinyl chloride, 0.30
Polyvinyl chloride acetate, 110
Polyvinyl formal, 10.0
Polyvinylidene chloride, 18
Polyvinylidene fluoride, 96
Rubber (natural), 1.30
Rubber/carbon (100/40), 3.2
Teflon, 37
Nothing beats glass, of course, but natural rubber, polystyrene, nylon and PVC are surprisingly good.
PVC here is 0.3 dB/cm, on previous link it was 11.2 dB/cm. They can’t both be right.
As before, reject anything with an attenuation above 10.