Date: 24/04/2018 17:38:03
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1216524
Subject: Star Trek Replicator

Breakfast cereal with milk, disguised as orange cake

Lunch sandwich chicken and lettuce disguised as orange cake

Dinner, roast beef with gravy peas and mashed potato disguised as orange cake

What would you do with a Star Trek replicator?

Reply Quote

Date: 24/04/2018 17:40:01
From: Peak Warming Man
ID: 1216526
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

Tau.Neutrino said:

Breakfast cereal with milk, disguised as orange cake

Lunch sandwich chicken and lettuce disguised as orange cake

Dinner, roast beef with gravy peas and mashed potato disguised as orange cake

What would you do with a Star Trek replicator?

Make another one.

Reply Quote

Date: 24/04/2018 17:48:21
From: Tau.Neutrino
ID: 1216530
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

Peak Warming Man said:


Tau.Neutrino said:

Breakfast cereal with milk, disguised as orange cake

Lunch sandwich chicken and lettuce disguised as orange cake

Dinner, roast beef with gravy peas and mashed potato disguised as orange cake

What would you do with a Star Trek replicator?

Make another one.

Say you had a bigger replicator, what then? One of these?

https://www.mercedes-benz.com.au/passengercars/mercedes-benz-cars/models/mercedes-maybach/mercedes-maybach-saloon/explore.html?gclid=CjwKCAjwq_vWBRACEiwAEReprBka02WAL8DGtxTNiflB7o6dUoI5gReP6KzuAM-mroFaitAS6cSCoxoCxSsQAvD_BwE

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2018 13:02:32
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1217015
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

> What would you do with a Star Trek replicator?

Gotta think about that one.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2018 15:17:51
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1217037
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

My insight is failing me here.

First thought was to set up an Earthlike environment on another planet. But that would take too much time and money.

Then thought of using it as originally intended. For supplies in an enclased environment such as a submarine or ISS. But that’s of limited utility.

I tried and failed to think of a great piece of scientific equipment to replicate.

For personal use, something beautiful, useful and practical. Perhaps one of these?

Nah.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2018 15:38:30
From: Cymek
ID: 1217041
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

Was holodecks for kinky sex stuff, could use the replicators for sex toy I imagine, “computer one Klingon dong “

Processing

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2018 21:12:44
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1217176
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

One of these perhaps.

Nah.

One of these perhaps.

Nah.

One of these perhaps.

Nah.

A small breeder reactor, makes its own nuclear fuel. Perhaps.
At least it would be more practical than a luxury yacht or luxury jet.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2018 21:20:50
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1217178
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

> What would you do with a Star Trek replicator?

How about SSTAR, a small self-contained fast breeder reactor that pumps out a constant 100 Megawatts for 30 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small,_sealed,_transportable,_autonomous_reactor

Still not an ideal answer, but getting there.

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2018 21:35:52
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1217186
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

> What would you do with a Star Trek replicator?

But let’s suppose that the replicator was only the size of, say, a microwave oven. One good use would be for producing products that greatly enhance the quality of life but are uneconomic to produce.

And that description includes the production of orphan drugs.

Dictionary definition: “orphan drug: a synthetic pharmaceutical which remains commercially undeveloped”

Reply Quote

Date: 26/04/2018 22:54:35
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1217224
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

> What would you do with a Star Trek replicator?

If small of size but can create new elements. Then consider the energy opportunities from antimatter.

Or Hafnium 178m2, which is a feasible power source but currently costs about 1 trillion dollars per kilogram. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafnium_controversy
But on the other hand the initial results remain unconfirmed.

But consider using it to produce human kidneys that are in very short supply for people on dialysis. And other human organs for transplant.

Perhaps bulk carbon nanotubes, decimetres in length.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2018 07:04:44
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1217238
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

> What would you do with a Star Trek replicator?

Fluoride Toothpaste!
Without mint, or with only 10% of the normal mint concentration.

A lot of people would want it to produce good tasting foods, like on Star Trek.

eg. Perfect coffee, tea, wine, real ale, gourmet cheese, chocolate.
Freshly picked peas, strawberries, and other fruits.
Perfectly ripe avocados.
Instant meals.

Reply Quote

Date: 27/04/2018 11:19:45
From: Cymek
ID: 1217312
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

I suppose it depends on it’s limit, bring back recently extinct animals

Reply Quote

Date: 30/04/2018 14:04:49
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1218437
Subject: re: Star Trek Replicator

Cymek said:


I suppose it depends on it’s limit, bring back recently extinct animals

I still feel that I’m missing 99.9% of the potential of the thing.

Sure drugs, food, transport, habitat, power supply, scientific tools, robots, isotopes, extinct animals, human organs and toys.

But what else?

Reply Quote