Date: 18/05/2018 22:39:40
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1227620
Subject: GAIA HR diagrams

I was feeling down and about to post (following Kim Gingell) that everything is crap. But this isn’t. This is brilliant.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.09378
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams

First off in Figure 1 there is a very odd collection of very hot O stars to the left of and below the main sequence that I’ve never seen before. Nobody knows exactly what these are, the two possibilities are Extreme Horizontal Branch stars and subdwarfs on their way to becoming white dwarfs (including planetary nebulae). Quite probably both.

Then the higher accuracy from GAIA shows that the main sequence really is thin after all. Previous charts showing it thick were the result of both observational inaccuracy (largely caused by dimming due to intervening gas and dust) and from double stars mistaken for single stars.

There are also revelations in the article about red clump stars, there isn’t just one clump but five separate clumps.

And about brown dwarf stars.

And most especially the disordered patch of white dwarf stars from earlier diagrams has resolved itself into two evolutionary lines, one each for hydrogen and helium dwarfs. And there are other white dwarfs in a region whose existance is totally unexplained.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/05/2018 13:55:43
From: dv
ID: 1227850
Subject: re: GAIA HR diagrams

Nice! Thanks, mollwolfumble.

Reply Quote

Date: 19/05/2018 14:05:14
From: The Rev Dodgson
ID: 1227852
Subject: re: GAIA HR diagrams

dv said:


Nice! Thanks, mollwolfumble.

Surely Human Resources diagrams are bad enough already, without bringing that Gaia stuff into it.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/05/2018 12:22:38
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1228416
Subject: re: GAIA HR diagrams

mollwollfumble said:

And most especially the disordered patch of white dwarf stars from earlier diagrams has resolved itself into two evolutionary lines, one each for hydrogen and helium dwarfs. And there are other white dwarfs in a region whose existance is totally unexplained.

For more on the white dwarfs, including elimination of unresolved binaries above the main collection, and the two separate evolutionary lines, see
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.05849.pdf

This paper also gives mass loss inherent in going from a main sequence star to a white dwarf. Masses in solar masses

Initial_mass, White_dwarf_mass
1, 0.5
1.5, 0.6
3, 0.75
5, 0.85
6.5, 1.0
This remains something of a mystery to me. How does a bog standard star like our Sun lose half of its mass without going supernova?

For more on white dwarfs from Gaia see https://arxiv.org/pdf/1805.04070.pdf, “Hundreds of new extremely low-mass (ELM) white dwarfs”. These ELM white dwarfs have a mass below 0.3 solar masses (see above table) and so cannot be explained using current physics. The best guess is that they were generated by extra mass loss due to close binary progenitors. Alternative hypotheses include the merger of the inner binary in a triple star system, supernova stripping, and mass ejection caused by a massive planet.

Other recent discoveries using data from Gaia include the following. The Gaia Data Release 2 (DR2) was made public at noon (CEST) on 25 April 2018 All of the following were published May 2018.

etc.

Reply Quote

Date: 20/05/2018 13:48:32
From: mollwollfumble
ID: 1228465
Subject: re: GAIA HR diagrams

mollwollfumble said:


I was feeling down and about to post (following Kim Gingell) that everything is crap. But this isn’t. This is brilliant.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1804.09378
Gaia Data Release 2: Observational Hertzsprung-Russell diagrams

First off in Figure 1 there is a very odd collection of very hot O stars to the left of and below the main sequence that I’ve never seen before. Nobody knows exactly what these are, the two possibilities are Extreme Horizontal Branch stars and subdwarfs on their way to becoming white dwarfs (including planetary nebulae). Quite probably both.

Then the higher accuracy from GAIA shows that the main sequence really is thin after all. Previous charts showing it thick were the result of both observational inaccuracy (largely caused by dimming due to intervening gas and dust) and from double stars mistaken for single stars.

There are also revelations in the article about red clump stars, there isn’t just one clump but five separate clumps.

And about brown dwarf stars.

And most especially the disordered patch of white dwarf stars from earlier diagrams has resolved itself into two evolutionary lines, one each for hydrogen and helium dwarfs. And there are other white dwarfs in a region whose existance is totally unexplained.

This website is really weird, it shows how the H-R diagram of Gaia stars in clusters evolves in time, by scrolling down the page. Click on individual clusters to see how each evolves in the H-R diagram over time.

http://sci.esa.int/gaia-stellar-family-portrait/

Reply Quote