… at a cost of $7.5 billion.
Why would they do that?
It seems like an awful lot of money to pay for an open source software development site.
… at a cost of $7.5 billion.
Why would they do that?
It seems like an awful lot of money to pay for an open source software development site.
The Rev Dodgson said:
… at a cost of $7.5 billion.Why would they do that?
It seems like an awful lot of money to pay for an open source software development site.
Would have been better if Github had bought Microsoft?
According to their advertising blurb, Github helps developers write better code.
mollwollfumble said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
… at a cost of $7.5 billion.Why would they do that?
It seems like an awful lot of money to pay for an open source software development site.
Would have been better if Github had bought Microsoft?
According to their advertising blurb, Github helps developers write better cookie code.
fixed.
The Rev Dodgson said:
… at a cost of $7.5 billion.Why would they do that?
It seems like an awful lot of money to pay for an open source software development site.
Perhaps they are developing something Microshaft sees as a threat to their business and they are buying them out
roughbarked said:
mollwollfumble said:
The Rev Dodgson said:
… at a cost of $7.5 billion.Why would they do that?
It seems like an awful lot of money to pay for an open source software development site.
Would have been better if Github had bought Microsoft?
According to their advertising blurb, Github helps developers write better cookie code.
fixed.
According to their advertising blurb, Github helps developers write better tracking cookies code.
ccleaner > 2145 tracking cookies deleted 1.5gb saved
fixed.